Mucins in lung cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications

Differential expression and clinical relevance of MUC1 in renal cell carcinoma metastasis

PURPOSE

To determine the differential expression patterns and prognostic relevance of Mucin-1 (MUC1) expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastasis.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays (TMA) from samples of 151 RCC metastases, 61 primary RCCs and corresponding benign renal tissues were immunohistochemically stained for MUC1 and semi-quantitatively evaluated by immunoreactivity scores (IRS). MUC1 differential expression in metastasis, primary RCC and normal tissue were comparatively analyzed. Patient characteristics and clinical follow-up for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) were recorded. Correlations of MUC1 expression with mRCC survival were determined.

RESULTS

Median cytoplasmic expression was highest in benign tissue (IRS = 1.04). Primary RCC (0.50) and metastasis (0.12) showed significantly lower cytoplasmic staining intensity. Membranous expression in benign tissue was, however, significantly lower (0.21) compared with primary RCC (0.59) and metastasis (0.57). Notable differences of MUC1 cytoplasmic and membranous expression were observed between different metastasis sites. Significantly higher (P = 0.014) membranous expression was observed in pulmonary versus non-pulmonary lesions, while no significant differences of cytoplasmic MUC1 expression were observed. The prognostic relevance of MUC1 expression in metastatic RCC was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

MUC1 is differentially expressed in benign renal tissue, primary RCC and RCC metastasis. Membranous MUC1 expression was significantly elevated in pulmonary metastases compared to non-pulmonary lesions, which may reflect individual biology and putative response to MUC1-based anti-cancer therapy.

MUC5AC interactions with integrin β4 enhances the migration of lung cancer cells through FAK signaling

MUC5AC is a secretory mucin aberrantly expressed in various cancers. In lung cancer, MUC5AC is overexpressed in both primary and metastatic lesions; however, its functional role is not well understood. The present study was aimed at evaluating mechanistic role of MUC5AC on metastasis of lung cancer cells. Clinically, the overexpression of MUC5AC was observed in lung cancer patient tissues and was associated with poor survival. In addition, the overexpression of Muc5ac was also observed in genetically engineered mouse lung adenocarcinoma tissues (Kras(G12D); Trp53(R172H/+); AdCre) in comparison with normal lung tissues. Our functional studies showed that MUC5AC knockdown resulted in significantly decreased migration in two lung cancer cell lines (A549 and H1437) as compared with scramble cells. Expression of integrins (α5, β1, β3, β4 and β5) was decreased in MUC5AC knockdown cells. As both integrins and MUC5AC have a von Willebrand factor domain, we assessed for possible interaction of MUC5AC and integrins in lung cancer cells. MUC5AC strongly interacted only with integrin β4. The co-localization of MUC5AC and integrin β4 was observed both in A549 lung cancer cells as well as genetically engineered mouse adenocarcinoma tissues. Activated integrins recruit focal adhesion kinase (FAK) that mediates metastatic downstream signaling pathways. Phosphorylation of FAK (Y397) was decreased in MUC5AC knockdown cells. MUC5AC/integrin β4/FAK-mediated lung cancer cell migration was confirmed through experiments utilizing a phosphorylation (Y397)-specific FAK inhibitor. In conclusion, overexpression of MUC5AC is a poor prognostic marker in lung cancer. MUC5AC interacts with integrin β4 that mediates phosphorylation of FAK at Y397 leading to lung cancer cell migration.

Hyper Expression of Mucin 5ac Indicates Poor Cancer Prognoses: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of the study was to explore the association between mucin 5ac expression and cancer prognosis. A systematically comprehensive search was performed through PubMed, the Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The prognostic value of mucin 5ac expression in cancer patients was evaluated. The overexpression of mucin 5ac was found to be significantly associated with a poor prognosis in cancer patients (pooled HR: 1.53, 95%CI: 1.158-2.028, P = 0.003). This association was also detected in a biliary subgroup (pooled HR: 1.83, 95%CI: 1.269-2.639, P = 0.001) and a gastrointestinal subgroup (pooled HR: 1.44, 95%CI: 1.069-1.949 P = 0.017). In the geography subgroup analysis, a statistical association was found in the Asian subgroup (pooled HR: 1.69, 95%CI: 1.200-2.384, P = 0.003). In the clinical characteristics analysis, a statistical association was found between the hyper expression of mucin 5ac and lymphatic metastasis. We indicated that mucin 5ac is a promising prognostic predictor for cancer, especially for biliary and gastrointestinal cancer, and is more suitable for predicting cancer prognoses in Asians.

Prognostic analysis of primary mucin-producing adenocarcinoma of the lung: a comprehensive retrospective study

Although primary mucin-producing adenocarcinoma of the lung is uncommon, each subtype has distinct clinical, pathological, molecular, and prognostic characteristics. This study aimed to determine correlations between clinical and pathological features and genetic phenotypes with the prognosis. We immunohistochemically examined the protein levels of thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), Napsin A, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and genetically examined epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations in these mucin-producing tumors. A total of 75 cases of mucin-producing adenocarcinoma of the lung were examined. ALK protein positivity was 33.3 % (25/75), and primarily occurred in solid predominant with mucin production subtype (SA). KRAS mutations occurred in 22.7 % (17/75) of patients, predominantly in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA). Positive TTF-1 and Napsin A expression was more common in SA, while they were both negative in IMA. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survival rates of mucin-producing lung adenocarcinoma were 85, 64, and 38 %, respectively; the overall survival rates were 90, 67, and 50 %, respectively. Larger tumors, advanced stage, and lymph node metastasis were associated with poor prognosis. Mucinous minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (m-MIA) had the best prognosis, followed by IMA, SA, and acinar or papillary predominant adenocarcinoma with mucin production (A/P). KRAS mutations were an independent positive prognostic factor for postoperative progress.