101
|
Abstract
The global numbers of robotic gastrointestinal surgeries are increasing. However, the evidence base for robotic gastrointestinal surgery does not yet support its widespread adoption or justify its cost. The reasons for its continued popularity are complex, but a notable driver is the push for innovation - robotic surgery is seen as a compelling solution for delivering on the promise of minimally invasive precision surgery - and a changing commercial landscape delivers the promise of increased affordability. Novel systems will leverage the robot as a data-driven platform, integrating advances in imaging, artificial intelligence and machine learning for decision support. However, if this vision is to be realized, lessons must be heeded from current clinical trials and translational strategies, which have failed to demonstrate patient benefit. In this Perspective, we critically appraise current research to define the principles on which the next generation of gastrointestinal robotics trials should be based. We also discuss the emerging commercial landscape and define existing and new technologies.
Collapse
|
102
|
Martin JR, Stefanidis D, Dorin RP, Goh AC, Satava RM, Levy JS. Demonstrating the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) curriculum on the RobotiX Mentor Virtual Reality Simulation Platform. J Robot Surg 2020; 15:187-193. [PMID: 32409995 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01085-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) is a proficiency-based progression curriculum developed by robotic surgery experts from multiple specialty areas to address gaps in existing robotic surgery training curricula. The RobotiX Mentor is a virtual reality training platform for robotic surgery. Our aims were to determine if robotic surgery novices would demonstrate improved technical skills after completing FRS training on the RobotiX Mentor, and to compare the effectiveness of FRS across training platforms. An observational, pre-post design, multi-institutional rater-blinded trial was conducted at two American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes-certified simulation centers. Robotic surgery novices (n = 20) were enrolled and trained to expert-derived benchmarks using FRS on the RobotiX Mentor. Participants' baseline skill was assessed before (pre-test) and after (post-test) training on an avian tissue model. Tests were video recorded and graded by blinded raters using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and a 32-criteria psychomotor checklist. Post hoc comparisons were conducted against previously published comparator groups. On paired-samples T tests, participants demonstrated improved performance across all GEARS domains (p < 0.001 to p = 0.01) and for time (p < 0.001) and errors (p = 0.003) as measured by psychometric checklist. By ANOVA, improvement in novices' skill after FRS training on the RobotiX Mentor was not inferior to improvement reported after FRS training on previously published platforms. Completion of FRS on the RobotiX Mentor resulted in improved robotic surgery skills among novices, proving effectiveness of training. These data provide additional validity evidence for FRS and support use of the RobotiX Mentor for robotic surgery skill acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Rhodes Martin
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 125, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Dimitrios Stefanidis
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Drive, Emerson Hall 125, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Ryan P Dorin
- Center for Education, Simulation and Innovation, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Alvin C Goh
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard M Satava
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Levy
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Institute for Surgical Excellence, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Huffman EM, Martin JR, Stefanidis D. Teaching technical surgery. Surgery 2020; 167:782-786. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
104
|
Alshuaibi M, Perrenot C, Hubert J, Perez M. Concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor simulator for robotic basic skills. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16:e2100. [PMID: 32112491 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess several criteria, such as concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor (RXM) simulator for basic robotic skills and to compare virtual and actual dry lab dome. METHODS A prospective study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2018 using RXM and a da Vinci Si robot. 37 subjects, divided into three groups according to their initial surgical training (expert, intermediate, and novice), were evaluated in terms of six representative exercises of basic robotic specific skills as recommended by the fundamentals of robotic surgery. RESULTS There was a correlation between the automatic data from the RXM and the subjective evaluation with the robot. The face and content validity, which were evaluated by the experts, were generally considered high (71.5% and 62.5%, respectively). Three levels (analysis of variance [ANOVA]; P = .01) and two levels (P = .001) of experience were clearly identified by the simulator. CONCLUSION Our study proves the concurrent validity and confirms the face, content, and construct validity of the RXM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muaath Alshuaibi
- Department of Urology, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Department of Urology, Hospital University, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia
| | - Cyril Perrenot
- School of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Lorraine University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Department of Visceral, Metabolic and Cancerology Surgery, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jacques Hubert
- Department of Urology, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,School of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Lorraine University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,IADI Laboratory, INSERM-U1254, Nancy University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Manuela Perez
- Department of Visceral, Metabolic and Cancerology Surgery, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,IADI Laboratory, INSERM-U947, Nancy University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Patnaik R, Anton NE, Stefanidis D. A video anchored rating scale leads to high inter-rater reliability of inexperienced and expert raters in the absence of rater training. Am J Surg 2020; 219:221-226. [PMID: 31918843 PMCID: PMC10495932 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective was to assess the impact of incorporating videos in a behaviorally anchored performance rating scale on the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of expert, intermediate and novice raters. METHODS The Intra-corporeal Suturing Assessment Tool (ISAT) was modified to include short video clips demonstrating poor, average, and expert performances. Blinded raters used this tool to assess videos of trainees performing suturing on a porcine model. Three attending surgeons, 4 residents, and 4 novice raters participated; no rater training was provided. The IRR was then compared among rater groups. RESULTS The IRR using the modified ISAT was high at 0.80 (p < 0.001). Ratings were significantly correlated with trainee objective suturing scores for all rater groups (experts: R = 0.84, residents: R = 0.81, and novices: R = 0.69; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Incorporating video anchors (to define performance) in the ISAT led to high IRR and enabled novices to achieve similar consistency in their ratings as experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronit Patnaik
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 545 Barnhill Dr. Emerson Hall, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Nicholas E Anton
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 545 Barnhill Dr. Emerson Hall, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Dimitrios Stefanidis
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 545 Barnhill Dr. Emerson Hall, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Dilley J, Singh H, Pratt P, Omar I, Darzi A, Mayer E. Visual behaviour in robotic surgery-Demonstrating the validity of the simulated environment. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16:e2075. [PMID: 31925895 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eye metrics provide insight into surgical behaviour allowing differentiation of performance, however have not been used in robotic surgery. This study explores eye metrics of robotic surgeons in training in simulated and real tissue environments. METHODS Following the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS), training curriculum novice robotic surgeons were trained to expert-derived benchmark proficiency using real tissue on the da Vinci Si and the da Vinci skills simulator (dVSS) simulator. Surgeons eye metrics were recorded using eye-tracking glasses when both "novice" and "proficient" in both environments. Performance was assessed using Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic skills (GEARS) and numeric psychomotor test score (NPMTS) scores. RESULTS Significant (P ≤ .05) correlations were seen between pupil size, rate of change and entropy, and associated GEARS/NPMTS in "novice" and "proficient" surgeons. Only number of blinks per minute was significantly different between pupilometrics in the simulated and real tissue environments. CONCLUSIONS This study illustrates the value of eye tracking as an objective physiological tool in the robotic setting. Pupilometrics significantly correlate with established assessment methods and could be incorporated into robotic surgery assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Dilley
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Harsimrat Singh
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Philip Pratt
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ismail Omar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ara Darzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Erik Mayer
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Andras I, Mazzone E, van Leeuwen FWB, De Naeyer G, van Oosterom MN, Beato S, Buckle T, O'Sullivan S, van Leeuwen PJ, Beulens A, Crisan N, D'Hondt F, Schatteman P, van Der Poel H, Dell'Oglio P, Mottrie A. Artificial intelligence and robotics: a combination that is changing the operating room. World J Urol 2019; 38:2359-2366. [PMID: 31776737 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03037-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the current narrative review was to summarize the available evidence in the literature on artificial intelligence (AI) methods that have been applied during robotic surgery. METHODS A narrative review of the literature was performed on MEDLINE/Pubmed and Scopus database on the topics of artificial intelligence, autonomous surgery, machine learning, robotic surgery, and surgical navigation, focusing on articles published between January 2015 and June 2019. All available evidences were analyzed and summarized herein after an interactive peer-review process of the panel. LITERATURE REVIEW The preliminary results of the implementation of AI in clinical setting are encouraging. By providing a readout of the full telemetry and a sophisticated viewing console, robot-assisted surgery can be used to study and refine the application of AI in surgical practice. Machine learning approaches strengthen the feedback regarding surgical skills acquisition, efficiency of the surgical process, surgical guidance and prediction of postoperative outcomes. Tension-sensors on the robotic arms and the integration of augmented reality methods can help enhance the surgical experience and monitor organ movements. CONCLUSIONS The use of AI in robotic surgery is expected to have a significant impact on future surgical training as well as enhance the surgical experience during a procedure. Both aim to realize precision surgery and thus to increase the quality of the surgical care. Implementation of AI in master-slave robotic surgery may allow for the careful, step-by-step consideration of autonomous robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iulia Andras
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Elio Mazzone
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tessa Buckle
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Shane O'Sullivan
- Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Beulens
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolae Crisan
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Peter Schatteman
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Henk van Der Poel
- Department of Urology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Urology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Rodrigues Armijo P, Huang CK, Carlson T, Oleynikov D, Siu KC. Ergonomics Analysis for Subjective and Objective Fatigue Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgical Skills Practice Among Surgeons. Surg Innov 2019; 27:81-87. [PMID: 31771411 DOI: 10.1177/1553350619887861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Our aim was to determine how self-reported and objectively measured fatigue of upper limb differ between laparoscopic and robotic surgical training environments. Methods. Surgeons at the 2016 SAGES Conference Learning Center and at our institution were enrolled. Two standardized surgical tasks (peg transfer [PT] and needle passing [NP]) were performed twice in each surgical skills practical environments: (1) laparoscopic training-box environment (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery [FLS]) and (2) Mimic dV-trainer (MIMIC). Muscle activation of upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis, and extensor digitorum were recorded using surface electromyography (EMG; Trigno, Delsys, Inc, Natick, MA). Subjective fatigue was self-reported using Piper Fatigue Scale-12. Analysis was done using SPSS v25.0, α = .05. Results. Demographics were similar between FLS (N = 14) and MIMIC (N = 12). For PT, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS of UT (P < .001) and AD (P < .001). Conversely, FLS led to significant decreased muscle fatigue in UT (P = .015). For NP, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS for UT (P = .034) and AD (P = .031), but FLS induced more muscle fatigue for AD (P = .004). There was significant decrease in self-reported fatigue after performing FLS tasks (P = .030) but not after MIMIC (P = .663). Conclusion. Our results showed that practice with MIMIC resulted in greater activation of shoulder muscles, while FLS caused more significant muscle fatigue in the same muscles. This could be due to ergonomic disadvantages and nonoptimal ergonomic settings. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal ergonomics and its impact on fatigue and muscle activation during use of both the FLS and MIMIC training systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chun-Kai Huang
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.,University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Tyson Carlson
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | | | - Ka-Chun Siu
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Julian D, Smith R. Developing an intelligent tutoring system for robotic-assisted surgery instruction. Int J Med Robot 2019; 15:e2037. [PMID: 31509636 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is an operative innovation that has sparked global interest. Over the last decade, RALS cases have rapidly increased with over 750 000 robotic procedures completed in 2017. Until recently, Intuitive's da Vinci surgical system has been the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved robotic-assisted surgical device for human procedures. Robotic procedures with the da Vinci require a specific, dedicated training due to the introduction of the technological components and psychomotor skills needed to successfully utilize this system. When a surgeon becomes interested in learning robotics, there are limited avenues for training. Surgeons typically receive instruction on the necessary psychomotor and Operation Room (OR) communication skills in isolation from the cognitive and perceptual skills and may only perform these skills in an integrated manner during a 1- or 2-day course. METHODS This paper discusses the development of a computer-based intelligent tutoring system (ITS) to train the cognitive and procedural skills needed to complete basic robotic suturing to novice robotic surgeons. The system was developed using the generalized intelligent framework for tutoring framework of tools. This information was captured as video, instruction sets, and flowcharts, which were reviewed for accuracy by surgeons and then encoded into an ITS using the generalized intelligent framework for tutoring tools. CONCLUSION The purpose of this paper was threefold-(a) explain the process used to obtain the critical data behind a basic robotic task, (b) develop an entry-level ITS to train the cognitive process and procedural steps behind multiple fundamental robotic surgery skills, and (c) provide future novice ITS developers lessons learned and future recommendations beyond the initial ITS prototype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Julian
- Research Department, AdventHealth Nicholson Center, Celebration, Florida
| | - Roger Smith
- Research Department, AdventHealth Nicholson Center, Celebration, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Palagonia E, Mazzone E, De Naeyer G, D'Hondt F, Collins J, Wisz P, Van Leeuwen FWB, Van Der Poel H, Schatteman P, Mottrie A, Dell'Oglio P. The safety of urologic robotic surgery depends on the skills of the surgeon. World J Urol 2019; 38:1373-1383. [PMID: 31428847 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02901-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the available literature evidence that discusses the effect of surgical experience on patient outcomes in robotic setting. This information is used to help understand how we can develop a learning process that allows surgeons to maximally accommodate patient safety. METHODS A literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus database was performed. Original and review articles published in the English language were included after an interactive peer-review process of the panel. RESULTS Robotic surgical procedures require high level of experience to guarantee patient safety. This means that, for some procedures, the learning process might be longer than originally expected. In this context, structured training programs that assist surgeons to improve outcomes during their learning processes were extensively discussed. We identified few structured robotic curricula and demonstrated that for some procedures, curriculum trained surgeons can achieve outcomes rates during their initial learning phases that are at least comparable to those of experienced surgeons from high-volume centres. Finally, the importance of non-technical skills on patient safety and of their inclusion in robotic training programs was also assessed. CONCLUSION To guarantee safe robotic surgery and to optimize patient outcomes during the learning process, standardized and validated training programs are instrumental. To date, only few structured validated curricula exist for standardized training and further efforts are needed in this direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Palagonia
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Elio Mazzone
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,Division of Experimental Oncology and Department of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Geert De Naeyer
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | | | - Pawel Wisz
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Fijs W B Van Leeuwen
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Van Der Poel
- Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Schatteman
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium. .,Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium. .,Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|