Management of primary hypothyroidism: statement by the British Thyroid Association Executive Committee

Patients' attitudes and perceptions towards treatment of hypothyroidism in general practice: an in-depth qualitative interview study

Background

Suboptimal thyroid hormone replacement is common in patients with hypothyroidism and the behavioural factors underlying this are poorly understood.

Aim

To explore the attitudes and perceptions of patients to thyroid hormone replacement therapy.

Design & setting

An in-depth qualitative interview study with patients with hypothyroidism residing in Northumberland, and Tyne and Wear, UK.

Method

Twenty-seven patients participated, of which 15 patients had thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels within the reference range (0.4–4.0 mU/L) and 12 patients had TSH levels outside the reference range. A grounded theory approach was used to explore and develop emerging themes, which were mapped to the health belief model (HBM).

Results

Patients generally had a low understanding of their condition or of the consequences of suboptimal thyroid hormone replacement. Patients that had experienced hypothyroid symptoms at initial diagnosis had a better perception of disease susceptibility, and this was reflected in excellent adherence to levothyroxine in this group of patients. The main benefits of optimal thyroid replacement were improved wellbeing and performance. However, patients who remained unwell despite a normal serum TSH level felt that their normal result presented a barrier to further evaluation of their symptoms by their GP.

Conclusion

Educating patients with hypothyroidism regarding the consequences of inadequate thyroid hormone replacement may reduce barriers and improve treatment outcomes. An over-reliance on TSH as a sole marker of wellbeing reduced opportunities for clinicians to address patient symptoms. Evaluating symptoms in combination with biochemical indices, may lead to better patient outcomes than relying on laboratory tests alone.

Current challenges in the pharmacological management of thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid dysfunction is common in pregnancy and has adverse fetal and maternal health consequences. A number of challenges in the management of gestational thyroid dysfunction remain unresolved including uncertainties in optimal thresholds for correction of hypothyroidism and strategies for pharmacological management of hyperthyroidism. Areas covered: We addressed key challenges and areas of uncertainty in the management of thyroid dysfunction in pregnancy. Expert commentary: Gestational thyroid hormone reference intervals vary according to population ethnicity, iodine nutrition, and assay method and each population should derive trimester specific reference intervals for use in pregnancy. Subclinical hypothyroidism and isolated hypothyroxinaemia are common in pregnancy but there is no consensus on the benefits of correcting these conditions. Although observational studies show potential benefits of levothyroxine on child neurocognitive function these benefits are have not been supported by two controlled trials. Carbimazole should be avoided in the first trimester of pregnancy due to risk of congenital anomalies but recent studies would suggest that this risk is present to a lesser magnitude with propylthiouracil. Current international guidelines recommend the use of propylthiouracil in the first trimester and switching to carbimazole for the remainder of pregnancy but the benefits and practicalities of this approach is unproven.

Treatment of hypothyroidism with levothyroxine plus liothyronine: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of a unique fixed combination levothyroxine/liothyronine (LT4/LT3) therapy in patients with primary hypothyroidism.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This is a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Adults with primary hypothyroidism (n = 32, age 42.6 ± 13.3, 30 females) on stable doses of LT4 for ≥ 6 months (125 or 150 μg/day) were randomized to continue LT4 treatment (G1) or to start LT4/LT3 therapy (75/15 μg/day; G2). After 8 weeks, participants switched treatments for 8 more weeks. Thyroid function, lipid profile, plasma glucose, body weight, electrocardiogram, vital signs, and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated at weeks 0, 8 and 16.

RESULTS

Free T4 levels were significantly lower while on LT4/LT3 (G1: 1.07 ± 0.29 vs. 1.65 ± 0.46; G2: 0.97 ± 0.26 vs. 1.63 ± 0.43 ng/dL; P < 0.001). TSH and T3 levels were not affected by type of therapy. More patients on LT4/LT3 had T3 levels above the upper limit (15% vs. 3%). The combination therapy led to an increase in heart rate, with no significant changes in electrocardiogram or arterial blood pressure. Lipid profile, body weight and QoL remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy yielded significantly lower free T4 levels, with no changes in TSH or T3 levels. More patients on LT4/T3 had elevated T3 levels, with no significant alterations in the evaluated outcomes. No clear clinical benefit of the studied formulation could be observed. Future trials need to evaluate different formulations and the impact of the combined therapy in select populations with genetic polymorphisms.

Thyroid Function Test Derangements and Mortality in Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We evaluated current evidence associating thyroid function test result derangements with risk for mortality in patients with chronic kidney failure treated by long-term dialysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

SETTING & POPULATION

Dialysis patients.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception through December 2015.

PREDICTORS

Hypothyroidism (thyrotropin level greater than reference range) and low triiodothyronine (T₃) and thyroxine (T₄) levels.

OUTCOMES

All-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

12 studies involving 14,766 participants (4,450 deaths) were identified. Of those, 6 studies provided data for cardiovascular mortality (2,772 participants with 327 cardiovascular deaths). Overall, confidence in the available evidence was moderate. Pooled adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality associated with hypothyroidism, low T₃ level, and low T₄ level were 1.24 (95% CI, 1.14-1.34), 1.67 (95% CI, 1.23-2.27), and 2.40 (95% CI, 1.47-3.93), respectively. Pooled adjusted HRs for cardiovascular mortality associated with low T₃ and T₄ levels were 1.84 (95% CI, 1.24-2.74) and 3.06 (95% CI, 1.29-7.24), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Fewer studies reporting on T₄ and thyrotropin outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with long-term dialysis, (cardiovascular) mortality is consistently higher in the presence of thyroid function test result derangements.

ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS STATEMENT-REPLACEMENT THERAPY FOR PRIMARY HYPOTHYROIDISM: A BRIEF GUIDE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

OBJECTIVE

Hypothyroidism requires life-long thyroid hormone replacement therapy in most patients. Oral levothyroxine (LT4) is an established safe and effective treatment for hypothyroidism, but some issues remain unsettled.

METHODS

The Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists appointed a panel of experts to provide an updated statement for appropriate use of thyroid hormone formulations for hypothyroidism replacement therapy. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines was followed.

RESULTS

LT4 is the first choice in replacement therapy. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) should be maintained between 1.0 and 3.0 mIU/L in young subjects and at the upper normal limit in elderly or fragile patients. Achievement of biochemical targets, patient well-being, and adherence to treatment should be addressed. In patients with unstable serum TSH, a search for interfering factors and patient compliance is warranted. Liquid or gel formulations may be considered in subjects with hampered LT4 absorption or who do not allow sufficient time before or after meals and LT4 replacement. Replacement therapy with LT4 and L-triiodothyronine (LT3) combination is generally not recommended. A trial may be considered in patients with normal values of serum TSH who continue to complain of symptoms of hypothyroidism only after co-existent nonthyroid problems have been excluded or optimally managed. LT3 should be administered in small (LT4:LT3 ratio, 10:1 to 20:1) divided daily doses. Combined therapy should be avoided in elderly patients or those with cardiac risk factors and in pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

LT4 therapy should be aimed at resolution of symptoms of hypothyroidism, normalization of serum TSH, and improvement of quality of life. In selected cases, the use of liquid LT4 formulations or combined LT4/LT3 treatment may be considered to improve adherence to treatment or patient well-being.

ABBREVIATIONS

AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists FT3 = free triiodothyronine FT4 = free thyroxine LT3 = levotriiodothyronine LT4 = levothyroxine MeSH = medicine medical subject headings QoL = quality of life TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Risks and safety of combination therapy for hypothyroidism

INTRODUCTION

Hypothyroidism is currently a condition that can be treated, but not cured. Although levothyroxine reverses stigmata of hypothyroidism in most individuals, some patients feel dissatisfied with 'monotherapy', and this has stimulated interest in 'combination therapy' with both levothyroxine and liothyronine.

AREAS COVERED

A search of PubMed was conducted using terms including hypothyroidism, treatment, benefits, risks, and safety. Based on the articles identified, the body of evidence regarding the efficacy of traditional levothyroxine is reviewed. Concerns with levothyroxine therapy including impaired quality of life in treated patients, thyroxine-predominant hormone ratios, and inadvertent iatrogenic thyroid disease are discussed. The trials of combination therapy performed since 1999 were reviewed. The heterogeneity of these trials, both in terms of design and results, is discussed. The potential for new trials to determine whether combination therapy can reverse the dissatisfaction associated with monotherapy, while avoiding non-physiologic hormone ratios, inadvertent thyrotoxicosis, and unacceptable side effects is discussed. Expert commentary: Research regarding which therapy fully reverses hypothyroidism at a tissue and cellular level is ongoing. The field would be advanced by the development of an extended release preparation of liothyronine. In the future regeneration of functional thyroid follicles from stem cells may offer hope for curing hypothyroidism.