Management of the malignant colorectal polyp: ACPGBI position statement

The results of local excision with or without postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for early rectal cancer among patients choosing to avoid radical surgery

AIM

The study aimed to establish the oncological outcome of patients who opted for close surveillance with or without adjuvant chemoradiotherapy rather than radical surgery after local excision (LE) of early rectal cancer.

METHOD

The Royal Marsden Hospital Rectal Cancer database was used to identify rectal cancer patients treated by primary LE from 2006 to 2015. All patients were entered in an intensive surveillance programme.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 34 analysed patients had a high or very high risk of residual disease predicted by adverse histopathological features for which the recommendation had been radical surgery. Eighteen (52%) of the 34 had received radiotherapy following LE. Three-year disease-free survival for the 34 patients was 85% (95% CI 78.8%-91.2%) and overall survival was 100%. Twenty-two of 24 patients with a low tumour which would have required total rectal excision have so far avoided radical surgery and remain disease free at a median follow-up of 3.2 years.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that with modern MRI and clinical surveillance radical surgery can be avoided in patients following initial LE of a histopathologically defined high risk early rectal cancer. These findings are comparable with those obtained after major radical resection and warrant further prospective investigation as a treatment arm in larger prospective trials.

Diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer in pedunculated polyps in daily clinical practice: a multicenter study

T1 colorectal cancer can be mimicked by pseudo-invasion in pedunculated polyps. British guidelines are currently one of the few which recommend diagnostic confirmation of T1 colorectal cancer by a second pathologist. The aim of this study was to provide insights into the accuracy of histological diagnosis of pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice. A sample of 128 cases diagnosed as pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2014 from 10 Dutch hospitals was selected for histological review. Firstly, two Dutch expert gastrointestinal pathologists reviewed all hematoxylin-eosin stained slides. In 20 cases the diagnosis T1 colorectal cancer was not confirmed (20/128; 16%). The discordant cases were subsequently discussed with a third Dutch gastrointestinal pathologist and a consensus diagnosis was agreed. The revised diagnoses were pseudo-invasion in 10 cases (10/128; 8%), high-grade dysplasia in 4 cases (4/128; 3%), and equivocal in 6 cases (6/128; 5%). To further validate the consensus diagnosis, the discordant cases were reviewed by an independent expert pathologist from the United Kingdom. A total of 39 cases were reviewed blindly including the 20 cases with a revised diagnosis and 19 control cases where the Dutch expert panel agreed with the original reporting pathologists diagnosis. In 19 of the 20 cases with a revised diagnosis the British pathologist agreed that T1 colorectal cancer could not be confirmed. Additionally, amongst the 19 control cases the British pathologist was unable to confirm T1 colorectal cancer in a further 4 cases and was equivocal in 3 cases. In conclusion, both generalist and expert pathologists experience diagnostic difficulty distinguishing pseudo-invasion and high-grade dysplasia from T1 colorectal cancer. In order to prevent overtreatment, review of the histology of pedunculated T1 colorectal cancers by a second pathologist should be considered with discussion of these cases at a multidisciplinary meeting.

Management of Rectal Polyps

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer and cancer morbidity in the United States. In comparison to colon polyps, rectal polyps pose a unique challenge. Advances in endoscopic techniques have allowed for more thorough rectal adenoma detection and removal; however, there remains a concern over piecemeal resection and negative resection margins. Advances in transanal excision techniques, such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery, have been proposed for the removal of benign polyps as well as some early stage rectal cancers, with emphasis on proper patient selection. This review will discuss the current endoscopic and surgical considerations of both benign and malignant rectal polyps.

Integrative analysis of the colorectal cancer proteome: potential clinical impact

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the common types of cancer that affects a significant proportion of the population and is a major contributor to cancer related mortality. The relatively poor survival rate of CRC could be improved through the identification of clinically useful biomarkers. Areas covered: This review highlights the need for biomarkers and discusses recent proteomics discoveries in the aspects of CRC clinical practice including diagnosis, prognosis, therapy, screening and molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE). Studies have been evaluated in relation to biomarker target, methodology, sample selection, limitations, and potential impact. Finally, the progress in proteomic approaches is briefly discussed and the main difficulties facing the translation of proteomics biomarkers into the clinical practice are highlighted. Expert commentary: The establishment of specific guidelines, best practice recommendations and the improvement in proteomic strategies will significantly improve the prospects for developing clinically useful biomarkers.

Interobserver variability amongst gastrointestinal pathologists in assessing prognostic parameters of malignant colorectal polyps: a cause for concern

BACKGROUND

Malignant colorectal polyps (MCRP) have become a major challenge in the field of coloproctology from diagnosis to full treatment. One important facet of the challenge is the histopathological staging of the lesion and identifying various prognostic parameters. The primary aim of this study was to find the interobserver variation amongst 4 experienced gastrointestinal pathologists when assessing important parameters and staging systems (Haggitt, Kikuchi and Ueno) in MCRPs.

METHODS

Four experienced gastrointestinal pathologists independently assessed 56 cases of MCRP, and each pathologist completed a pro forma for each case. The results were collated and statistically analysed.

RESULTS

There was a significant variation in the assessments using the various published staging systems agreed upon on important prognostic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the staging systems used is suitable for all polyp types or has good reproducibility. There is an urgent need to make pathologists' assessment of MCRPs easier and more reproducible.

A comparison of endoscopy versus pathology sizing of colorectal adenomas and potential implications for surveillance colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare endoscopy and pathology sizing in a large population-based series of colorectal adenomas and to evaluate the implications for patient stratification into surveillance colonoscopy.

METHODS

Endoscopy and pathology sizes available from intact adenomas removed at colonoscopies performed as part of the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, from 2010 to 2015, were included in this study. Chi-squared tests were applied to compare size categories in relation to clinicopathologic parameters and colonoscopy surveillance strata according to current American Gastroenterology Association and British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 2521 adenomas from 1467 individuals were included. There was a trend toward larger endoscopy than pathology sizing in 4 of the 5 study centers, but overall sizing concordance was good. Significantly greater clustering with sizing to the nearest 5 mm was evident in endoscopy versus pathology sizing (30% vs 19%, P < .001), which may result in lower accuracy. Applying a 10-mm cut-off relevant to guidelines on risk stratification, 7.3% of all adenomas and 28.3% of those 8 to 12 mm in size had discordant endoscopy and pathology size categorization. Depending on which guidelines are applied, 4.8% to 9.1% of individuals had differing risk stratification for surveillance recommendations, with the use of pathology sizing resulting in marginally fewer recommended surveillance colonoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

Choice of pathology or endoscopy approaches to determine adenoma size will potentially influence surveillance colonoscopy follow-up in 4.8% to 9.1% of individuals. Pathology sizing appears more accurate than endoscopy sizing, and preferential use of pathology size would result in a small, but clinically important, decreased burden on surveillance colonoscopy demand. Careful endoscopy sizing is required for adenomas removed piecemeal.

Endoscopic tattooing of early colon carcinoma enhances detection of lymph nodes most prone to harbor tumor burden

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs result in the detection of early-stage asymptomatic carcinomas suitable to be surgically cured. Lymph nodes (LN) from early CRC are usually small and may be difficult to collect. Still, at least 12 LNs should be analyzed from colectomies, to ensure a reliable pN0 stage. Presurgical endoscopic tattooing improves LN procurement. In addition, molecular detection of occult LN tumor burden in histologically pN0 CRC patients is associated with a decreased survival rate. We aimed to study the impact of presurgical endoscopic tattooing on the molecular detection of LN tumor burden in early colon neoplasms.

Methods

A prospective cohort study from a CRC screening-based population was performed at a tertiary academic hospital. LNs from colectomies with and without preoperative endoscopic tattooing were assessed by two methods, hematoxylin and eosin (HE), and RT-LAMP, to detect tumor cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA. We compared the amount of tumor burden and LN yields from tattooed and non-tattooed specimens.

Results

HE and RT-LAMP analyses of 936 LNs were performed from 71 colectomies containing early carcinomas and endoscopically unresectable adenomas (8 pT0, 17 pTis, 27 pT1, 19 pT2); 47 out of 71 (66.2 %) were tattooed. Molecular positivity correlated with the presence of tattoo in LN [p < 0.001; OR 3.1 (95 % CI 1.7–5.5)]. A significantly higher number of LNs were obtained in tattooed specimens (median 17 LN vs. 14.5 LN; p = 0.019).

Conclusions

Endoscopic tattooing enables the analysis of those LNs most prone to harbor tumor cells and improves the number of LN harvested.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5026-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hybrid Laparoendoscopic Approaches to Endoscopically Unresectable Colon Polyps

Secondary prevention of colorectal cancer relies on effective screening through colonoscopy and polypectomy. Resection of some polyps can present technical challenges particularly when polyps are large, flat, or behind colonic folds. Laparoscopy as an adjunct to endoscopy can aid in removing difficult colonic polyps without subjecting patients to radical segmental colectomy. Hybrid laparoendoscopic techniques are increasingly reported in literature as alternatives to segmental colectomy for the treatment of polyps that have a high likelihood of being benign. Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy is the most frequently utilized technique; it harnesses the power of laparoscopy to aid endoscopic polypectomy by flattening folds, mobilizing flexures, and providing retraction. Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge and transluminal resection are often reported in older studies and use the visualization provided by intraoperative colonoscopy to guide colonic resection that is limited to the area of the polyp. Laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a relatively recent technique that provides laparoscopic monitoring of EFTR of polyp as well as endoscopic closure of the ensuing defect. Minimally invasive segmental colectomy based on oncologic principles should be utilized when none of the previous techniques are suitable or when malignancy is strongly suspected. The combined use of laparoscopy and endoscopy can expand the endoscopist's armamentarium when dealing with the most challenging polyps, while serving the patients' best interest by limiting the extent of colon resection.

Management of malignant colorectal polyps in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

The management of colorectal polyps containing a focus of malignancy is problematic, and the risks of under- and over-treatment must be balanced. The primary aim of this study was to describe the management and outcomes of patients with malignant polyps in the New Zealand population; the secondary aim was to investigate prognostic factors.

METHODS

Retrospective review of relevant clinical records at five New Zealand District Health Boards.

RESULTS

Out of the 414 patients identified, 51 patients were excluded because of the presence of other relevant colorectal pathology, leaving 363 patients for analysis. Of these, 182 had a polypectomy, and 181 had a bowel resection as definitive treatment. The overall 5-year survival was not altered with resection but was improved with re-excision of any form (repeat polypectomy or bowel resection). There were 110 rectal lesions and 253 colonic lesions. A total of 16% of patients who had resection after polypectomy were found to have residual cancer in the resected specimen. Ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and metastatic disease were found to negatively impact overall survival (P < 0.001). Resection was more likely to follow polypectomy if polypectomy margins were positive, fragmentation occurred for sessile lesions and for pedunculated lesions with a higher Haggitt level.

CONCLUSION

Polypectomy is oncologically safe in selected patients. Re-excision improves overall survival and should be considered in patients with low comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists score 1 and 2) and where there is concern about margins (sessile lesions and positive polypectomy margins). In the majority of patients, however, no residual disease is found.

Surgery has a key role for quality assurance of colorectal cancer screening programs: impact of the third level multidisciplinary team on lymph nodal staging

PURPOSE

From 2011 to 2013 in the area of the Naples 3 public health district (ASL-NA3), a colorectal cancer screening program (CCSP) was developed. In order to stress the need of quality assurance procedures for surgery and pathology, a third level oncologic pathway was added and set up at a referral colorectal cancer center (RC). Lymph nodal (LN) harvesting, as a process indicator, and nodal positivity were adopted for an interim analysis.

METHODS

The program was implemented by a series of audit meetings and a double type of multidisciplinary team (MDT): "horizontal" and "vertical." Three hundred and forty colorectal cancer (CRC) patients underwent surgery: 119 chose to be operated at the RC (Gr In), 65 were operated at 22 district hospitals (DH) (Gr Out), and 156 symptomatic not screened patients were operated at the RC (Gr Sym).

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed differences between Gr In and Gr Out colon groups both for LN harvesting (median of 26 and 11, respectively, P = 0.0001), and for nodal positivity after the first screening round (34.78 and 19.45%, respectively, P = 0.0169). Results were all the more significant in a subset analysis on early T stage colon subgroups (In vs Out) both for LN harvesting (P < 0.0001) and nodal positivity (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

xSignificant differences between RC and DHs were found, particularly for early-stage CRC patients. LN harvesting should be considered as a surrogate marker of quality assurance for at least screening hospitals for "minimum best" standard of care. This should lead to set up a third level in any CCSP.

British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps

These guidelines provide an evidence-based framework for the management of patients with large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs), in addition to identifying key performance indicators (KPIs) that permit the audit of quality outcomes. These are areas not previously covered by British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Guidelines.A National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) compliant BSG guideline development process was used throughout and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool was used to structure the guideline development process. A systematic review of literature was conducted for English language articles up to May 2014 concerning the assessment and management of LNPCPs. Quality of evaluated studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Methodology Checklist System. Proposed recommendation statements were evaluated by each member of the Guideline Development Group (GDG) on a scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) with >80% agreement required for consensus to be reached. Where consensus was not reached a modified Delphi process was used to re-evaluate and modify proposed statements until consensus was reached or the statement discarded. A round table meeting was subsequently held to finalise recommendations and to evaluate the strength of evidence discussed. The GRADE tool was used to assess the strength of evidence and strength of recommendation for finalised statements.KPIs, a training framework and potential research questions for the management of LNPCPs were also developed. It is hoped that these guidelines will improve the assessment and management of LNPCPs.

Small carcinomas involving less than one-quarter of the rectal circumference: local excision is still associated with a high risk of nodal positivity

AIM

A study was carried out to determine the relationship between mesorectal lymph nodal involvement and T stage in a group of patients with a rectal cancer involving less than one-quarter of the rectal circumference, such as might be selected for local excision.

METHOD

The data of patients having rectal resection between 2010 and 2014 were prospectively entered in a rectal carcinoma registry. A model for describing tumours involving less than one quadrant of the rectal circumference was created to facilitate the evaluation process.

RESULTS

In all, 304 patients were included in the study. In 68 (22.4%) a small tumour (< 1 quadrant involved) was found. Of these, 26.5% had positive mesorectal lymph nodes (N+). In lesions of Stage ypT0 cancer 12.5% patients were node positive, in Stage Tis and T1 tumours there was no case of node positivity, but in Stage T2 and Stage T3 cancers the incidence of node positivity was 27.5% and 64%.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that, even for small tumours involving only one rectal quadrant, the risk of lymph nodal involvement was about 25%. Had the patients undergone local excision the treatment would have been incomplete.

Adverse histological features in malignant colorectal polyps: a contemporary series of 239 cases

AIMS

Screening colonoscopy has led to more colorectal carcinomas presenting at an early stage potentially curable by endoscopic resection. In this study, we examined the clinical and histological features of a contemporary series of malignant colorectal polyps (MCPs) with subsequent surgical resection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on a consecutive series of MCPs from 239 patients, predominantly males (57.7%) with a median age of 66 years, and assessed histological parameters associated with residual disease on the surgical specimens.

RESULTS

Median MCP size was 18.6 mm, with 23.1% polyps measuring ≤10 mm. From the 140 surgical resection specimens, residual disease was identified in 20 cases, including 12 cases with metastatic lymph nodes and/or 9 cases with residual carcinoma in the large bowel wall. Histological parameters associated with nodal metastases were greater width and greater depth of the invasive component (p=0.001 and 0.006, respectively), poor differentiation (p=0.003) and a cribriform pattern (p=0.01). The risk of nodal metastases was 23.3% if two or three of these features were identified, while it was 0% and 4.5% if none or one was present, respectively. A positive margin was not associated with nodal metastasis and might be adequately treated by local endoscopic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection should be recommended if ≥2 of these adverse histological features are present and may be warranted if one feature is present. A positive margin may require additional local resection but not necessarily surgery if no other adverse factors are present.

Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines

Early colon cancer (ECC) has been defined as a carcinoma with invasion limited to the submucosa regardless of lymph node status and according to the Royal College of Pathologists as TNM stage T1 NX M0. As the potential risk of lymph node metastasis ranges from 6 to 17% and the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis is not reliable, the management of ECC is still controversial, varying from endoscopic to radical resection. A meeting on recent advances on the management of colorectal polyps endorsed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) took place in April 2014, in Genoa (Italy). Based on this material the SICCR decided to issue guidelines updating the evidence and to write a position statement paper in order to define the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for ECC treatment in context of the Italian healthcare system.

The management of malignant polyps in colorectal cancer screening programmes: A retrospective Italian multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Although recognition of colorectal malignant polyps is increasing, treatment plans lack the evidence of randomised trials.

AIM

To retrospectively evaluate presentation, management and outcomes of screen-detected colorectal malignant polyps, with special focus on the role of histological factors in therapeutic decision-making.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data regarding malignant polyps detected during faecal immuno-chemical test-based screening programmes in five centres in North-Eastern Italy between April 2008 and April 2013.

RESULTS

306 malignant polyps in 306 patients were included; 72 patients underwent surgery directly (23.6%). Of 234 patients treated endoscopically, 133 subsequently underwent radicalisation surgery (56.8%) and in 17 there was evidence of residual disease (12.8%). Involved, unsafe (<1mm) or invaluable resection margins and sessile morphology represented the most frequent determinants of subsequent surgery. The mean number of nodes harvested during radicalisation surgery was 7.1±6.4 (range 0-29). Histological diagnosis was re-evaluated according to new guidelines in 125 cases (41%); in 18 this led to modification of the risk class (14.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the rate of surgical treatment following endoscopic resection is similar to other studies, residual disease at surgery was lower than most international series. Adhering to the new histological reporting system and respecting guidelines on node harvesting may favourably influence prognosis.

Practice Guideline for the Surveillance of Patients After Curative Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer

Current evidence suggests improved rates of curative secondary treatment following identification of recurrence among patients who participate in a surveillance program after initial curative resection of colon or rectal cancer. The newer data show that surveillance CEA, chest and liver imaging,and colonoscopy can also improve survival through early diagnosis of recurrence; thus, these modalities are now included in the current guideline. Although the optimum strategy of surveillance for office visits, CEA, chest and liver imaging, and colonoscopy is not yet defined, routine surveillance does improve the detection of recurrence that can be resected with curative intent. Recommended surveillance schedules are shown in Table 4. However, the factors to be considered when recommending surveillance include underlying risk for recurrence, patient comorbidity, and the ability to tolerate major surgery to resect recurrent disease or palliative chemotherapy, performance status, physiologic age, preference, and compliance. The success of surveillance for early detection of curable recurrence will depend on patient and provider involvement to adhere to the surveillance schedule and avoid unnecessary examination. It should be noted that, after curative resection of colorectal cancer, patients are still at risk for other common malignancies(lung, breast, cervix, prostate) for which standard screening recommendations should be observed and measures to maintain general health (risk reduction for cardiovascular disease, eg, cessation of smoking, control of blood pressure and diabetes mellitus, balanced diet, regular exercise and sleep, and flu vaccines) should be recommended.

The Ueno method for substaging pT1 colorectal adenocarcinoma by depth and width measurement: an interobserver study

AIM

Early pT1 polyp colorectal cancers (CRCs) present challenges for accurate pathology substaging. Haggitt and Kikuchi stages depend on polyp morphology and are often difficult to apply due to suboptimal orientation or fragmentation, or absence of the muscularis propria in polypectomy or submucosal resection specimens. European guidelines for quality assurance suggest using Ueno's more objective approach, using depth and width measurements beyond muscularis mucosae. We have investigated interobserver variation using Ueno's approach.

METHOD

Ten consecutive pT1 polyp CRCs were identified and the slides assessed by six gastrointestinal pathologists for depth and width of invasion. A further 60 polyps were studied by a group of specialist and general pathologists. Agreement was assessed by analysis of variance. A polyp CRC is classified as high risk if it has a depth ≥ 2000 μm or a width ≥ 4000 μm and low risk with a depth < 2000 μm or a width < 4000 μm. Concordance for the dichotomized values was assessed using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for depth was 0.83 and for width 0.56 in the 10-polyp group. The ICC for the 60-polyp CRCs was 0.67 for depth and 0.37 for width. In both groups, when polyp CRCs are divided into high- and low-risk categories based on depth, there was substantial and moderate agreement (κ = 0.80 and 0.47) but only fair agreement when based on width (κ = 0.34 and 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Ueno's method has the advantage of being independent of polyp morphology. Our study shows better concordance for depth measurement and reproducibility in nonfragmented specimens, with poorer agreement when based on width.

Assessment and management of the malignant colorectal polyp

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer affecting men and women in England. The introduction of National Bowel Cancer Screening in 2006 has led to a rise in the proportion of colorectal cancers detected at an early stage. Many screen-detected cancers are malignant colorectal polyps and may potentially be cured with endoscopic resection, without recourse to the risk of major surgery or prolonged adjuvant therapies. Endoscopic decision making is crucial to select those early lesions that may be suitable for local endoscopic excision as well as identifying lesions for surgical resection, thus avoiding unnecessary surgical intervention in some and ensuring potentially curative surgery in others. This paper uses the current evidence base to provide a structured approach to the assessment of potentially malignant polyps and their management. http://group.bmj.com/products/journals/instructions-for-authors/licence-forms.

Management of colonic polyps and the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

This article describes the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme and the management of large colonic polyps, many of which are diagnosed and managed successfully during bowel cancer screening, in addition to non-endoscopic management options.

Paradigm shift in the management of rectal cancer

Surgery for rectal cancer in the pre-Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) era was associated with high local recurrence rates. The widespread adoption of the TME technique together with the addition of neoadjuvant oncological therapies have reduced local failure rates and improved survival for patients with rectal cancer. Advances in our knowledge, better understanding of tumour biology and refinement in minimal access techniques and equipment have significantly changed the management of rectal cancer. This paper reviews these changes and proposes a paradigm shift in how rectal cancer management is conceptualised and treated, such that the treatment of rectal cancer is separated into early tumours (potentially suitable for local excison), TME tumours (optimally managed by TME) and beyond TME tumours (optimally managed by multivisceral resection outside the TME plane).

Risk assessment in early colorectal cancer: histological and molecular markers

The pathological examination of early colorectal cancer specimens, in particular 'malignant polyps', provides important prognostic information. The depth of invasion into the submucosal layer assessed according to the Haggitt (for pedunculated lesions) or Kikuchi (for nonpolypoid lesions) classification systems or by direct measurement has been associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis. Angioinvasion, in particular lymphatic invasion, budding, tumor differentiation or grade, and resection margin status have been identified as further risk factors. The combination of these parameters allows the stratification of affected individuals into low- and high-risk categories, which is pivotal for clinical management. For low-risk cancers, defined as a completely excised Haggitt level 1-3/Kikuchi sm1 tumor with no evidence of poor differentiation or angioinvasion, local excision is generally regarded as adequate treatment. Oncological surgical resection is, however, indicated for high-risk cancers, which show at least one of the following features: Haggitt level 4/Kikuchi sm3 invasion, the presence of lymphatic (or vascular) invasion, poor differentiation, or positive resection margin. The inclusion of molecular markers such as tumor suppressor genes and their products, markers involved in tumor vascularization, and markers related to tumor cell adhesion and invasion may help to refine risk stratification, but data on molecular markers are still limited in this regard.

Management of malignant colon polyps: Current status and controversies

Colon cancer remains a significant clinical problem worldwide and in the United States it is the third most common cancer diagnosed in men and women. It is generally accepted that most malignant neoplasms of the colon arise from precursor adenomatous polyps. This stepwise progression of normal epithelium to carcinoma, often with intervening dysplasia, occurs as a result of multiple sequential, genetic mutations-some are inherited while others are acquired. Malignant polyps are defined by the presence of cancer cells invading through the muscularis mucosa into the underlying submucosa (T1). They can appear benign endoscopically but the presence of malignant invasion histologically poses a difficult and often controversial clinical scenario. Emphasis should be initially focused on the endoscopic assessment of these lesions. Suitable polyps should be resected en-bloc, if possible, to facilitate thorough evaluation by pathology. In these cases, proper attention must be given to the risks of residual cancer in the bowel wall or in the surrounding lymph nodes. If resection is not feasible endoscopically, then these patients should be referred for surgical resection. This review will discuss the important prognostic features of malignant polyps that will most profoundly affect this risk profile. Additionally, we will discuss effective strategies for their overall management.

Endolaparoscopic removal of colonic polyps

AIM

A proportion of colonic polyps is not amenable to exclusively colonoscopic removal due to their location, size or tortuosity of the colon. A combined laparoscopic/colonoscopic polypectomy or endolaparoscopic polypectomy (ELP) is an alternative to formal segmental resection. We present our experience of ELP.

METHOD

This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who underwent ELP for preoperatively diagnosed benign polyps between 2010 and 2013. Data are presented as median (interquartile range, IQR).

RESULTS

Thirty patients commenced ELP. Eighteen were male and the median (IQR) age was 65.4 (61.6-73.5) years. Of 30 attempted cases, 22 (73%) underwent successful ELP surgery. Patients in whom combined ELP surgery was unsuccessful were converted to laparoscopic colectomy (one) or colonic mobilization and colotomy (seven). The median operation time for successful ELP was 105 (75-125) min. The complication rate was 13.3% and the median length of stay was 2.0 (1.0-3.0) days for successful ELP compared with 5.5 (3.5-6.8) days for converted patients (P = 0.014). The median polyp size was 14 (10-22) mm; eight (26.7%) had high-grade dysplasia with two cases of invasive cancer identified.

CONCLUSION

A combined endoscopic-laparoscopic approach provides an alternative to segmental resection for treating challenging colonic polyps. This approach appears to be safe and effective and should be offered to selected patients with benign colonic polyps.

Intraoperative hypercarbia and massive surgical emphysema secondary to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS)

We describe a case where full-thickness excision of a rectal lesion caused massive surgical emphysema and subsequent hypercarbia with associated difficulties with ventilation. This unique case highlights the risks of respiratory failure with extraperitoneal insufflation as in this case and as more commonly with intraperitoneal insufflation. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is a technique that is being increasingly used in the management of large and early malignant rectal polyps. We reviewed the literature in order to understand the case and to highlight factors that should minimise any adverse sequelae. In the presence of ventilatory difficulties secondary to postoperative surgical emphysema, whether via extraperitoneal insufflation as described here or with intraperitoneal insufflation (as in laparoscopy), consider decreasing gas pressures, expediting the procedure, delaying extubation and prolonged close monitoring in recovery with possible admission to a high dependency unit (HDU) or intensive care unit (ICU).