Modulation of kir4.1 and kir5.1 by hypercapnia and intracellular acidosis

Cloning, characterization, and chromosomal mapping of a human electroneutral Na(+)-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger

The electroneutral Na(+)-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger is a key mechanism for regulating intracellular pH (pH(i)) in neurons, glia, and other cells. Here we report the cloning, tissue distribution, chromosomal location, and functional characterization of the cDNA of such a transporter (NDCBE1) from human brain (GenBank accession number AF069512). NDCBE1, which encodes 1044 amino acids, is 34% identical to the mammalian anion exchanger (AE2); approximately 50% to the electrogenic Na/HCO3 cotransporter (NBCe1) from salamander, rat, and humans; approximately 73% to mammalian electroneutral Na/HCO3 cotransporters (NBCn1); 71% to mouse NCBE; and 47% to a Na(+)-driven anion exchanger (NDAE1) from Drosophila. Northern blot analysis of NDCBE1 shows a robust approximately 12-kilobase signal in all major regions of human brain and in testis, and weaker signals in kidney and ovary. This human gene (SLC4A8) maps to chromosome 12q13. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes and running in the forward direction, NDCBE1 is electroneutral and mediates increases in both pH(i) and [Na(+)](i) (monitored with microelectrodes) that require HCO3(-) and are blocked by 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS). The pH(i) increase also requires extracellular Na(+). The Na(+):HCO3(-) stoichiometry is 1:2. Forward-running NDCBE1 mediates a 36Cl efflux that requires extracellular Na(+) and HCO3(-) and is blocked by DIDS. Running in reverse, NDCBE1 requires extracellular Cl(-). Thus, NDCBE1 encodes a human, electroneutral Na(+)-driven Cl-HCO3 exchanger.

Prolonged hypercapnia-evoked cerebral hyperemia via K(+) channel- and prostaglandin E(2)-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase induction

Mechanisms for secondary sustained increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) during prolonged hypercapnia are unknown. We show that induction of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) by an increase in prostaglandins (PGs) contributes to the secondary CBF increase during hypercapnic acidosis. Ventilation of pigs with 6% CO(2) (PaCO(2 approximately)65 mm Hg; pH approximately 7.2) caused a approximately 2.5-fold increase in CBF at 30 minutes, which declined to basal values at 3 hours and gradually rose again at 6 and 8 hours; the latter increase was associated with PG elevation, nitrite formation, eNOS mRNA expression, and in situ NO synthase (NOS) reactivity (NADPH-diaphorase staining). Subjecting free-floating brain sections to acidotic conditions increased eNOS expression, the time course of which was similar to that of CBF increase. Treatment of pigs with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor diclofenac or the NOS inhibitor Nomega-nitro-L-arginine blunted the initial rise and prevented the secondary CBF increase during hypercapnic acidosis; neuronal NOS blockers 1-(2-trifluoromethylphenyl) imidazole and 3-bromo-7-nitroindazole were ineffective. Diclofenac abolished the hypercapnia-induced rise in cerebrovascular nitrite production, eNOS mRNA expression, and NADPH-diaphorase reactivity. Acidosis (pH approximately 7.15, PCO(2 approximately )40 mm Hg; 6 hours) produced similar increases in prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) and eNOS mRNA levels in isolated brain microvessels and in NADPH-diaphorase reactivity of brain microvasculature; these changes were prevented by diclofenac, by the receptor-operated Ca(2+) channel blocker SK&F96365, and by the K(ATP) channel blocker glybenclamide. Acidosis increased Ca(2+) transients in brain endothelial cells, which were blocked by glybenclamide and SK&F96365 but not by diclofenac. Increased PG-related eNOS mRNA and NO-dependent vasorelaxation to substance P was detected as well in rat brain exposed to 6 hours of hypercapnia. PGE(2) was the only major prostanoid that modulated brain eNOS expression during acidosis. Thus, in prolonged hypercapnic acidosis, the secondary CBF rise is closely associated with induction of eNOS expression; this seems to be mediated by PGE(2) generated by a K(ATP) and Ca(2+) channel-dependent process.

Molecular determinants for the distinct pH sensitivity of Kir1.1 and Kir4.1 channels

Kir1.1 (ROMK1) is inhibited by hypercapnia and intracellular acidosis with midpoint pH for channel inhibition (pK(a)) of approximately 6.7. Another close relative, Kir4.1 (BIR10), is also pH sensitive with much lower pH sensitivity (pK(a) approximately 6. 0), although it shares a high sequence homology with Kir1.1. To find the molecular determinants for the distinct pH sensitivity, we studied the structure-functional relationship using site-directed mutagenesis. An NH(2)-terminal residue (Lys-53) was found to be responsible for the low pH sensitivity in Kir4.1. Mutation of this lysine to valine (K53V), a residue seen at the same position in Kir1. 1, markedly increased channel sensitivity to CO(2)/pH. Reverse mutation on Kir1.1 (V66K) decreased the CO(2)/pH sensitivities. Interestingly, mutation of these residues to glutamate greatly enhanced the pH sensitivity in both channels. Other contributors to the distinct pH sensitivity were histidine residues in the COOH terminus, whose numbers are fewer in Kir4.1 than Kir1.1. Mutation of two of these histidine residues in Kir1.1 (H342Q/H354N) reduced CO(2)/pH sensitivities, whereas the creation of two histidines (S328H/G340H) in Kir4.1 increased the CO(2)/pH sensitivities. Combined mutations of the lysine and histidine residues in Kir4.1 (K53V/S328H/G340H) gave rise to a channel that had CO(2)/pH sensitivities almost identical to those of the wild-type Kir1.1. Thus the residues demonstrated in our current studies are likely the molecular basis for the distinct pH sensitivity between Kir1.1 and Kir4.1.

A single residue contributes to the difference between Kir4.1 and Kir1.1 channels in pH sensitivity, rectification and single channel conductance

Kir1.1 and Kir4.1 channels may be involved in the maintenance of pH and K+ homeostasis in renal epithelial cells and CO2 chemoreception in brainstem neurons. To understand the molecular determinants for their characteristic differences, the structure-function relationship was studied using site-directed mutagenesis. According to previous studies, Glu158 in Kir4.1 is likely to be the major rectification controller. This was confirmed in both Kir1.1 and Kir4.1. Mutation of Gly210, the second potential rectification controller, to glutamate did not show any additional effect on the inward rectification. More interestingly, we found that Glu158 in Kir4.1 was also an important residue contributing to single channel conductance and pH sensitivity. The E158N Kir4.1 mutant had a unitary conductance of 35 pS and a midpoint pH for channel inhibition (pKa) value of 6.72, both of which were almost identical to those of the wild-type (WT) Kir1.1. Flickering channel activity was clearly seen in the E158N mutant at positive membrane potentials, which is typical in the WT Kir1.1 but absent in the WT Kir4.1. Reverse mutation in Kir1.1 (N171E) reduced the unitary conductance to 27 pS (23 pS in WT Kir4.1). However, the pH sensitivity of this mutant did not show a marked difference from the WT Kir1.1. Therefore, it is possible that a residue(s) in addition to Asn171 is also involved. Thus we studied several other residues in both M2 and H5 regions. We found that joint mutations of Val140 and Asn171 to residues seen in Kir4.1 greatly reduced the pH sensitivity (pKa 6. 08). The V140T mutation in Kir1.1 led to a unitary conductance of approximately 70 pS, and the G210E mutation in Kir4.1 caused a decrease in pH sensitivity of 0.4 pH units. These results indicate that the pore-forming sequences are targets for modulations of multiple channel-biophysical properties and demonstrate a site contributing to rectification, unitary conductance and proton sensitivity in these Kir channels.

Biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels by CO2 and pH

CO2 chemoreception may be related to modulation of inward rectifier K+ channels (Kir channels) in brainstem neurons. Kir4.1 is expressed predominantly in the brainstem and inhibited during hypercapnia. Although the homomeric Kir4.1 only responds to severe intracellular acidification, coexpression of Kir4.1 with Kir5.1 greatly enhances channel sensitivities to CO2 and pH. To understand the biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of these currents by CO2 and pH, heteromeric Kir4. 1-Kir5.1 were studied in inside-out patches. These Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents showed a single channel conductance of 59 pS with open-state probability (P(open)) approximately 0.4 at pH 7.4. Channel activity reached the maximum at pH 8.5 and was completely suppressed at pH 6.5 with pKa 7.45. The effect of low pH on these currents was due to selective suppression of P(open) without evident effects on single channel conductance, leading to a decrease in the channel mean open time and an increase in the mean closed time. At pH 8.5, single-channel currents showed two sublevels of conductance at approximately 1/4 and 3/4 of the maximal openings. None of them was affected by lowering pH. The Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents were modulated by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) that enhanced baseline P(open) and reduced channel sensitivity to intracellular protons. In the presence of 10 microM PIP2, the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 showed a pKa value of 7.22. The effect of PIP2, however, was not seen in homomeric Kir4.1 currents. The CO2/pH sensitivities were related to a lysine residue in the NH2 terminus of Kir4.1. Mutation of this residue (K67M, K67Q) completely eliminated the CO2 sensitivity of both homomeric Kir4.1 and heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1. In excised patches, interestingly, the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 carrying K67M mutation remained sensitive to low pHi. Such pH sensitivity, however, disappeared in the presence of PIP2. The effect of PIP2 on shifting the titration curve of wild-type and mutant channels was totally abolished when Arg178 in Kir5.1 was mutated. Thus, these studies demonstrate a heteromeric Kir channel that can be modulated by both acidic and alkaline pH, show the modulation of pH sensitivity of Kir channels by PIP2, and provide information of the biophysical and molecular mechanisms underlying the Kir modulation by intracellular protons.