Endoscopic ultrasound cannot determine suitability for esophagectomy after aggressive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Correlation of EUS measurement with pathologic assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

EUS-measured reduction in tumor size after neoadjuvant therapy has previously been correlated with downstaging and improved survival in patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine whether tumor changes measured by EUS correspond to pathologically assessed chemoradiotherapy-induced tumor regression.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with esophageal cancer treated with combined modality treatment were studied. After initial EUS, patients completed a cisplatin/carboplatinum, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy regimen and underwent repeat EUS before resection. A positive response on EUS was defined as a 50% reduction in maximal tumor cross-sectional area. Chemoradiotherapy-induced tumor regression was assessed in resection specimens by using a previously defined pathologic scoring system based on the extent of tumor proliferation into adjacent fibrosis.

RESULTS

Pathologic tumor regression was present in 23, indeterminate in 5, and minimal or absent in 13 patients. EUS measured a positive response in 20 of 23 (87%) patients with CRT-induced tumor regression and a negative response in 10 of 13 (77%) patients with absent tumor regression (p < 0.001). EUS had a positive predictive value of 80% for pathologic tumor regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of tumor size by EUS is a reliable clinical method for assessing pathologic tumor regression before surgery.

Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer

AIMS

This prospective study was designed to determine the utility of 18F-labelled deoxyglucose (FDG) in positron emission tomography (PET) (FDG-PET) for assessing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in locally advanced oesophageal tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (clinical T4 stage) without organ metastases, underwent FDG-PET before and 1 month after CRT. Patients were classified as major responders by serial FDG-PET when the post-CRT PET demonstrated a strong reduction of FDG uptake at the primary tumour site (>80% reduction of tumour-to-liver uptake ratio) without any abnormal FDG uptake elsewhere in the body. PET response was compared with histology obtained during post-induction transthoracic oesophagectomy.

RESULTS

A strong correlation was found between the extent of lymph node (LN) involvement as shown by the pre-CRT PET and the major response rate (P = 0.001): such response occurred in nine of 11 N0M0 patients (82%), in three of nine N(1-2)M0 patients (33%) and in two of 16 patients (13%) with distant lymphatic spread. Such a correlation was not found for computed tomography or endoscopic ultrasonography. The sensitivity of serial FDG-PET for a major CRT response was 10 of 14 (71%), its specificity 18 of 22 (82%). The concordance between the response assessment by PET and histopathology was 78%. The median survival time after CRT of PET major responders compared with PET non-major responders was 16.3 months and 6.4 months, respectively. The metabolic response as measured by serial FDG-PET is a stronger prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.002) than the extent of LN involvement seen on the pretreatment FDG-PET (P = 0.087).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that CRT response as assessed by serial FDG-PET is strongly correlated with pathological response and survival.

Salvage esophagectomy for recurrent tumors after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Some patients and oncologists choose to treat localized esophageal cancer with definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy rather than surgery. A subset of these patients have local relapse without distant metastases and therefore have no other curative intent treatment option but salvage esophagectomy.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with salvage esophagectomy from 1987 to 2000 at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (n = 13, salvage after chemotherapy and radiotherapy group) and compared the data with those of patients receiving esophagectomy in a planned fashion 4 to 6 weeks after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (n = 99, preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy group).

RESULTS

Increases in morbidity were seen after resection in the salvage after chemotherapy and radiotherapy group relative to the preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy group: mechanical ventilation (9.0 days vs 3.3 days, P =.08), intensive care unit stay (11.2 days vs 5.1 days, P =.07), hospital stay (29.4 days vs 18.4 days, P =.03), and anastomotic leak rates (5/13 [39%] vs 7/99 [7%], P =.005). Operative mortality (within 30 days) also tended to be increased statistically nonsignificantly (2/13 [15%] vs 6/99 [6%], P =.2). Salvage esophagectomy resulted in long-term survival (25% 5-year survival) in a subset of patients. Improved survival after salvage esophagectomy was associated with early pathologic stage (T1 N0, T2 N0), prolonged time to relapse, and R0 surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy for relapse of tumor after definitive chemoradiation therapy have increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital use relative to patients undergoing planned esophagectomy after preoperative chemoradiation. Nevertheless, long-term survival can be achieved in this group, and such treatment should be considered for carefully selected patients at an experienced center.

Esophageal cancer

Accurate pretherapy staging for esophageal cancer is important for stage-directed therapy. Precise staging is also essential for quality control and ensuring the validity of clinical trials. Endoscopic ultrasound is currently the best technique in local regional staging. Various investigators have attempted to overcome the problems of nontraversable lesions and restaging after neoadjuvant therapy. Positron emission tomography scan was shown to be especially useful in identifying distant metastases. Its more widespread use is likely to impact on treatment strategies. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment of esophageal cancer. Improvement in immediate postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival was shown by various reports to relate to experience and volume. The concept of three-field dissection was further defined by illustrating the importance of lymphadenectomy around the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Multimodality treatments continue to receive attention. Several studies have established the patterns of practice in the United States in treating esophageal cancer. Chemoradiation programs are gaining a more important role and are widely used, although their exact roles are uncertain. Closely related to this area of research is the search of molecular markers of favorable response to such therapies. Concerning palliative treatment for esophageal cancer, self-expanding metallic stents have a definite role in patients with malignant dysphagia. Their results and complications are reviewed. Lastly, quality-of-life issues have assumed more importance in studies in oncology. Prospective quality-of-life data should be evaluated in future studies on different treatment methods for this deadly disease.

Current status of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography

Endoscopic ultrasonography is firmly established as an imaging modality that can be used for diagnosing and staging both malignant and nonmalignant disorders of the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, biliary tree, and mediastinum. In the future, as more physicians are trained and as technologic developments continue to advance, endosonography will likely assume a greater role in therapeutic management.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer carries a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate following resection ranges from 10 to 35 per cent. Recent evidence suggests that the addition of non-surgical treatments to surgery may improve resection rates, reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival. This review examines the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature review (1980-2000) was performed using the key words 'neoadjuvant or preoperative' and 'chemoradiotherapy or radiochemotherapy'. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Forty-six non-randomized and six randomized trials of preoperative CRT were found. Resection rates, pathological complete response (pCR), treatment-related mortality rates and relapse patterns are documented. Improved 5-year survival rates approaching 60 per cent may be achieved following pCR. Three of the six randomized trials show a benefit in either overall survival or disease-free survival compared with surgery alone. Treatment-related toxicity can be significant.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT may improve survival. Emerging evidence suggests that CRT alone can achieve similar survival rates to surgery alone. New imaging modalities may help to select which patients require surgery. Larger randomized trials of preoperative CRT or chemotherapy are needed to define optimal regimens and produce higher pCR rates with acceptable toxicity.

Neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: response evaluation by positron emission tomography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) to assess the response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Imaging modalities, including endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, currently used to evaluate response to neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer do not reliably differentiate between responders and nonresponders.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with histopathologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, located at or above the tracheal bifurcation, underwent neoadjuvant therapy consisting of external-beam radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil as a continuous infusion. FDG-PET was performed before and 3 weeks after the end of radiotherapy and chemotherapy (before surgery). Quantitative measurements of tumor FDG uptake were correlated with histopathologic response and patient survival.

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant therapy, 24 patients underwent surgery. Histopathologic evaluation revealed less than 10% viable tumor cells in 13 patients (responders) and more than 10% viable tumor cells in 11 patients (nonresponders). In responders, FDG uptake decreased by 72% +/- 11%; in nonresponders, it decreased by only 42% +/- 22%. At a threshold of 52% decrease of FDG uptake compared with baseline, sensitivity to detect response was 100%, with a corresponding specificity of 55%. The positive and negative predictive values were 72% and 100%. Nonresponders to PET scanning had a significantly worse survival after resection than responders.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET is a valuable tool for the noninvasive assessment of histopathologic tumor response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Role of endoscopy in the staging of esophageal and gastric cancer

Progress in instrumentation and clinical research continues to expand the potential utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the treatment of esophageal and gastric cancer. This review focuses on the role of EUS in the staging and treatment planning of patients with esophageal and gastric cancer.

Esophageal cancer: a systematic review

Carcinoma of the esophagus has one of the lowest possibilities of cure, with 5-year survival rates estimated to be approximately 10% overall; these rates are second only to hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers. This fact and the rapid increase in the incidence of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus in recent years challenges us to identify areas of improvement for all aspects of this disease. We discuss potential reasons for the increase in the incidence of adenocarcinomas, evidence that defines the similarity between tumors of the gastroesophageal junction and the tubular esophagus, and other prognostic factors that may influence future modifications of our staging classification of this disease. Surgical advances have translated into improvements in surgical morbidity and mortality rates. Current therapeutic options and the relative merits of the options are discussed. Improvements in patient outcome most likely hinge on earlier diagnosis, more accurate staging, and the optimal use of combined modalities, coupled with technical advances in the modalities. A systematic review approach was undertaken to evaluate the performance characteristics of newer staging tools and the value of different combined modality approaches with particular focus on the use of those approaches for patients with potentially curable disease. A similar methodologic approach was used to address the utility of the many strategies currently used in practice for the palliation of esophageal tumors, with particular focus on the relief of malignant dysphagia. Finally, a summary of published guidelines and population-based patterns of care are presented. This serves as an overview of how all of this evidence actually translates into the care we are providing. A coordinated international effort in population-based research and randomized controlled trials would be the cornerstone to future advances in this relatively uncommon but devastating disease.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Does Not Accurately Assess Pathologic Stage of Esophageal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for initial staging of esophageal cancer is widely accepted. There is, however, considerable variability in the reported accuracy of EUS for restaging of esophageal neoplasms after neoadjuvant therapy. From June 1995 through December 1999, we prospectively studied a series of 26 patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer and were subsequently restaged by EUS before resection. Twenty-four patients had adenocarcinoma (92%), and two patients had squamous cell carcinoma (8%). EUS correctly predicted tumor stage in seven of 26 patients for an overall accuracy of 27 per cent. EUS overestimated the depth of tumor penetration in 18 patients (69%) and underestimated depth of penetration in one patient (4%). Lymph nodes were correctly staged in 15 of 26 patients for an overall accuracy of 58 per cent. Levels of sensitivity for detecting N0 and N1 disease were 44 per cent and 80 per cent respectively. Patients with a complete pathologic response were staged as T4N1 (one patient), T3N1 (three patients), T3N1 (one patient), and T2N1 (two patients). EUS cannot distinguish tumor involvement of the esophageal wall and lymph nodes from the postinflammatory changes that characterize effective neoadjuvant treatment. EUS is of limited utility in guiding clinical decision making after neoadjuvant therapy.

Minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing in the United States, and the 5-year survival rate is dismal. Preliminary data suggest that conventional imaging is inaccurate in staging esophageal cancer and could limit accurate assessment of new treatments. The objective of this study was to compare minimally invasive surgical staging (MIS) with conventional imaging for staging esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer were eligible. Staging by conventional methods used computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and abdomen, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), whereas MIS used laparoscopy and videothoracoscopy. Conventional staging results were compared to those from MIS.

RESULTS

In 53 patients, the following stages were assigned by CT scan and EUS: carcinoma in situ (CIS; n = 1), I (n = 1), II (n = 23), III (n = 20), IV (n = 8). In 17 patients (32.1%), MIS demonstrated inaccuracies in the conventional imaging, reassigning a lower stage in 10 patients and a more advanced stage in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In 32.1% of patients with esophageal cancer, MIS changed the stage originally assigned by CT scan and EUS. Therefore, MIS should be applied to evaluate the accuracy of new noninvasive imaging methods and to assess new therapies for esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer

Papers published in the English literature on esophageal cancer in 1999 were retrieved by a MEDLINE search. Selective publications were reviewed in light of current knowledge. Many studies were performed to refine staging methods of esophageal cancer, especially in the use of endoscopic ultrasound. Although better designs have overcome the problem of nontraversable tumors, its use in staging after neoadjuvant therapies remains suboptimal. Important studies on various surgical techniques were reported, including randomized trials on different routes of reconstruction after esophageal extirpation, and the updated results of transhiatal resections. In contrast to the minimalist approach of transhiatal resection, investigators from both East and West have also described the pathologic basis of lymphatic spread of esophageal cancer and its implications, favoring more radical lymphadenectomy. Another avenue that was explored is the use of neoadjuvant therapies to improve outcome. Different regimens were studied, and many papers focused on the molecular prediction of favorable response to such therapies. Overenthusiastic adoption of multimodality treatments is cautioned, however, in that they have not been validated. Further work is much needed in this area of research.

Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in carcinoma of the esophagus

Esophageal carcinoma remains a highly lethal disease that has shown a recent profound increase in prevalence and an equally dramatic epidemiologic shift. There is a well recognized causal association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, and the molecular events underlying this progression from mucosal injury, to metaplasia, to dysplasia, to carcinoma are now becoming clear. Current diagnostic modalities and preoperative staging systems all have significant limitations. Fortunately, chemoprevention strategies and the identification of clinically useful molecular biomarkers that may be used to stage disease and select appropriate therapy are on the horizon. The extent of surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma remains an area of great controversy. Disease that is confined to the mucosa is being diagnosed more commonly, and endoscopic ablative techniques have been proposed. To date, however, preoperative discrimination of tumor depth and presence of regional nodal metastases remains inadequate in these very early lesions, and caution is urged before adopting therapies that may compromise cure. For disease penetrating the mucosa, the extent of surgical therapy must be tailored by the objectives of treatment (cure vs palliation) and preoperative stage. Surgical resection is the current standard of care, with combined-modality therapy reserved for prohibitive surgical candidates. No clear survival benefit has been documented for neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. The results of preoperative combined-modality therapy, including three prospective, randomized trials, are encouraging but to date have not shown a definite benefit.

Does paclitaxel improve the chemoradiotherapy of locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer? A nonrandomized comparison with fluorouracil-based therapy

PURPOSE

A phase II trial of accelerated fractionation radiation with concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy was performed to investigate the role of the paclitaxel, when substituted for fluorouracil (5-FU), in the chemoradiotherapy of esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with an esophageal ultrasound stage of T(3) or N(1) or M(1) (nodal) esophageal cancer were treated with two courses of a cisplatin infusion (20 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 24 hours) concurrent with a split course of accelerated fractionation radiation (1.5 Gy bid to a total dose of 45 Gy). Surgical resection was performed 4 to 6 weeks later followed by a single identical postoperative course of chemoradiotherapy (24 Gy) in patients with significant residual tumor at surgery. Toxicity and results of this treatment were retrospectively compared with our previous 5-FU and cisplatin chemoradiotherapy experience.

RESULTS

Between September 1995 and July 1997, 40 patients were entered onto this study. Although dysphagia proved worse in our 5-FU-treated patients, profound leukopenia and a need for unplanned hospitalization were significantly more common in the paclitaxel group. Thirty-seven patients (93%) proved resectable for cure. The 3-year projected overall survival is 30%, locoregional control is 81%, and distant metastatic disease control is 44%. When compared with a similarly staged cohort of 5-FU-treated patients, there was no advantage for any survival function studied.

CONCLUSION

This paclitaxel-based treatment regimen for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer produced increased toxicity with no improvement in results when compared with our previous 5-FU experience. Paclitaxel-based treatments must be carefully and prospectively studied before their incorporation into the standard management of esophageal cancer.