Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial

Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

The Solitaire Flow Restoration Device is a novel, self-expanding stent retriever designed to yield rapid flow restoration in acute cerebral ischaemia. We compared the efficacy and safety of Solitaire with the standard, predicate mechanical thrombectomy device, the Merci Retrieval System.

METHODS

In this randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled patients from 18 sites (17 in the USA and one in France). Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had acute ischaemic stroke with moderate to severe neurological deficits and were treatable by thrombectomy within 8 h of stroke symptom onset. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly allocate patients to receive thrombectomy treatment with either Solitaire or Merci (1:1; block sizes of four and stratified by centre and stroke severity). The primary endpoint was Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) scale 2 or 3 flow in all treatable vessels without symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, after up to three passes of the assigned device, as assessed by an independent core laboratory, which was masked to study assignment. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. A prespecified efficacy stopping rule triggered an early halt to the trial. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 01054560.

RESULTS

Between February, 2010, and February, 2011, we randomly allocated 58 patients to the Solitaire group and 55 patients to the Merci group. The primary efficacy outcome was achieved more often in the Solitaire group than it was in the Merci group (61%vs 24%; difference 37% [95% CI 19-53], odds ratio [OR] 4·87 [95% CI 2·14-11·10]; p(non-inferiority)<0·0001, p(superiority)=0·0001). More patients had good 3-month neurological outcome with Solitaire than with Merci (58%vs 33%; difference 25% [6-43], OR 2·78 [1·25-6·22]; p(non-inferiority)=0·0001, p(superiority)=0·02). 90-day mortality was lower in the Solitaire group than it was in the Merci group (17 vs 38; difference -21% [-39 to -3], OR 0·34 [0·14-0·81]; p(non-inferiority)=0·0001, p(superiority)=0·02).

INTERPRETATION

The Solitaire Flow Restoration Device achieved substantially better angiographic, safety, and clinical outcomes than did the Merci Retrieval System. The Solitaire device might be a future treatment of choice for endovascular recanalisation in acute ischaemic stroke.

FUNDING

Covidien/ev3.

Stroke treatment using intravenous and intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator

OPINION STATEMENT

Acute ischemic stroke is the most common cause of adult disability in the world and the third most common cause of death. Early restoration of perfusion to ischemic brain has been a highly successful strategy to decrease the disability associated with acute ischemic stroke. For acute stroke, intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is the only proven acute treatment that results in improved clinical outcomes. IV t-PA is indicated for ischemic stroke when administered within 4.5 h or less of symptom onset. This 4.5-hour treatment window represents a significant expansion from the previous 3-hour treatment window for therapy. Despite a longer time window, patients have the greatest chance for an improved outcome when treatment occurs as soon as possible from the time of symptom onset. The Emergency Department goal for treatment is a door to t-PA administration time of 60 min. In order to facilitate rapid evaluation and treatment, systems of care that streamline treatment should be developed at every institution that cares for acute ischemic stroke patients. For those with contraindications to t-PA and those outside the treatment window, catheter-directed intra-arterial (IA) t-PA administration or mechanical clot extraction is a potential means of restoring brain perfusion. These therapies should not preclude the use of IV t-PA when feasible and are frequently only available at tertiary care centers. Technological advances in IA devices for mechanical clot extraction make this a promising and growing area for advancing stroke therapy but remain under ongoing investigation to establish improved clinical outcomes.

[Industry-funded therapy studies: what is in the pipeline?]

Several acute stroke trials are underway or have been recently completed. Among the latter are the ICTUS trial and the IST-3 trial. Several other approaches are being tested for thrombolytic therapy among them modern imaging-based patient selection and new thrombolytic agents, such as desmoteplase and tenecteplase. Other strategies include neuroprotection and neurorestoration, biophysical approaches, such as near infrared laser therapy, hemodynamic augmentation and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation. Mechanical thrombectomy is practiced in many centers although randomized trials are pending and the IMS-3 trial was stopped. This overview will cover the very recently completed and currently recruiting acute ischemic stroke trials.

Combined full-dose IV and endovascular thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing trend to treating proximal vessel occlusions with intravenous-inter-arterial (IV-IA) thrombolysis. The best dose of IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) remains undetermined. We compared the combination of full-dose IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and IA thrombolytic therapy to IA therapy.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2009, we reviewed our computed tomographic angiography database for patients who received full-dose intravenous rtPA and endovascular therapy or endovascular therapy alone for acute ischaemic stroke treatment. Details of demographics, risk factors, endovascular procedure, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were noted. Modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at three-months was used as good outcome. Recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischaemia 2-3 flow on angiography.

RESULTS

Among 157 patients, 104 patients received IV-IA treatment and 53 patients underwent direct IA therapy. There was a higher recanalization rate with IV-IA therapy compared with IA alone (71% vs. 60%, P < 0·21) which was driven by early recanalization after IV rtPA. Mortality and independent outcome were comparable between the two groups. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 8% of patients (12% in the IA group, 7% in the IV-IA group) but was more frequent as the intensity of intervention increased from device alone to thrombolytic drug alone to device plus thrombolytic drug(s). Recanalization was a strong predictor of reduced mortality risk ratio (RR) 0·48 confidence interval95 0·27-0·84) and favourable outcome (RR 2·14 confidence interval95 1·3-3·5).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined IV-IA therapy with full-dose intravenous rtPA was safe and results in good recanalization rates without excess symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. Testing of full-dose IV tPA followed by endovascular treatment in the IMS3 trial is justified.

Design and rationale of the Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy (MR RESCUE) Trial

RATIONALE

Multimodal imaging has the potential to identify acute ischaemic stroke patients most likely to benefit from late recanalization therapies.

AIMS

The general aim of the Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy Trial is to investigate whether multimodal imaging can identify patients who will benefit substantially from mechanical embolectomy for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke up to eight-hours from symptom onset.

DESIGN

Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy is a randomized, controlled, blinded-outcome clinical trial.

POPULATION STUDIED

Acute ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel intracranial internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1 or M2 occlusion enrolled within eight-hours of symptom onset are eligible. The study sample size is 120 patients.

STUDY INTERVENTION

Patients are randomized to endovascular embolectomy employing the Merci Retriever (Concentric Medical, Mountain View, CA) or the Penumbra System (Penumbra, Alameda, CA) vs. standard medical care, with randomization stratified by penumbral pattern.

OUTCOMES

The primary aim of the trial is to test the hypothesis that the presence of substantial ischaemic penumbral tissue visualized on multimodal imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) predicts patients most likely to respond to mechanical embolectomy for treatment of acute ischaemic stroke due to a large vessel, intracranial occlusion up to eight-hours from symptom onset. This hypothesis will be tested by analysing whether pretreatment imaging pattern has a significant interaction with treatment as a determinant of functional outcome based on the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale measure of global disability assessed 90 days post-stroke. Nested hypotheses test for (1) treatment efficacy in patients with a penumbral pattern pretreatment, and (2) absence of treatment benefit (equivalency) in patients without a penumbral pattern pretreatment. An additional aim will only be tested if the primary hypothesis of an interaction is negative: that patients treated with mechanical embolectomy have improved functional outcome vs. standard medical management.

Bridging therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pending the results of randomized controlled trials, the benefit and safety of bridging therapy (combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis) remain to be determined. The aim of this analysis was to give reliable estimates of efficacy and safety outcomes of bridging therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of all studies using bridging therapy published between January 1966 and March 2011.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 15 studies. The pooled estimate for recanalization rate was 69.6% (95% CI, 63.9%-75.0%). Meta-analysis on clinical outcomes showed a pooled estimate of 48.9% (95% CI, 42.9%-54.9%) for favorable outcome, 17.9% (95% CI, 12.7%-23.7%) for mortality, and 8.6% (95% CI, 6.8%-10.6%) for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. In meta-regression analysis, the shorter mean time to intravenous treatment, the greater the recanalization rate (per 10-minute decrease: OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.51) and the lower mortality rate (per 10-minute decrease: OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94). By using the control groups of intravenous alteplase-treated patients in 8 studies, bridging therapy was associated with a favorable outcome (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.16-4.40), but no differences in mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage outcomes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Bridging therapy is associated with acceptable safety and efficacy in stroke patients. Time to intravenous treatment is critical to improve recanalization rates and favorable outcomes.

Retrospective multicenter study of Solitaire FR for revascularization in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of the Solitaire FR device in the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large artery occlusion.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke treated with Solitaire FR as the first-line device to restore blood flow in 6 experienced European centers. This study was entirely funded and supported by Coviden Neurovascular. An independent Corelab determined modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scores on the preprocedure and postprocedure angiograms. Complete revascularization was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b or 3 post-Solitaire FR device use. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as parenchymal hemorrhage Type 2 associated with a decline of ≥ 4 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score within 24 hours or causing death. Favorable functional outcome was considered as modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2 at Day 90.

RESULTS

We studied 141 patients (mean age, 66 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 18); 74 patients received intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator before endovascular treatment. Complete revascularization was achieved in 120 of 142 occlusion sites (85%) and good outcome in 77 of 141 (55%) patients. Good outcome was more frequent in patients treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator than in those without (66% versus 42%; P<0.01). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was reported in 5 patients (4%) and 29 of 141 (20%) patients died or were lost during follow-up (3 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study with centralized evaluation shows that the use of Solitaire FR is safe and achieves good revascularization rates and functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large artery occlusion.

Current acute stroke trials and their potential impact on the therapeutic time window

Several trials in acute stroke are underway or have been completed recently. Among the latter, ECASS 3 was a milestone regarding the extension of the rigid 3-h time window out to 4.5 h for intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Several other approaches are being tested for thrombolytic therapy, among them modern imaging-based patient selection of patients and interventional approaches. Other pharmaceutical strategies include neuroprotection, and restoration, biophysical approaches, such as near infrared laser therapy, hemodynamic augmentation, and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation. This perspective will cover the recently completed and currently recruiting acute stroke trials with respect to their potential role in expanding the therapeutic time window for acute ischemic stroke.

[Treatment of arterial and venous brain ischemia. Experts' recommendations: stroke management in the intensive care unit]

With thrombolysis, intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg body weight, maximum 90 mg), with 10% of the dose given as a bolus followed by a 60-minute infusion, is recommended within 4.5 hours of onset of ischemic stroke. When indicated, intravenous thrombolysis must be initiated as soon as possible. It is possible to use intravenous alteplase in patients with seizures at stroke onset, if the neurological deficit is related to acute cerebral ischemia. Intravenous alteplase can be discussed for use on a case-by-case basis, according to risk of bleeding, in selected patients under 18 years and over 80 years of age, although for the current European recommendations this would be an off-label use. In hospitals with a stroke unit, intravenous thrombolysis is prescribed by a neurologist (current French labelling) or a physician having the French certification for neurovascular diseases (outside the current French labelling). The patient must be monitored in the stroke unit or in case of multiple organ failure in an intensive and critical care unit. In hospitals without a stroke unit, thrombolysis must be decided by the neurologist from the corresponding stroke unit via telemedicine. It is recommended to perform brain imaging 24 hours after thromboysis. Intra-arterial thrombolysis can be contemplated on a case-by-case basis after multidisciplinary discussion within a 6-hour time window for patients with acute middle cerebral artery or carotid occlusions, and within a larger time window for patients with basilar artery occlusion, because of their very poor spontaneous prognosis. Mechanical thrombectomy can also be contemplated in the same situations. With antiplatelet agents, it is recommended that patients receive aspirin (160 mg-325 mg) within 48 hours of ischemic stroke onset. When thrombolysis is performed or contemplated, it is recommended to delay the initiation of aspirin or other antithrombotic drugs for 24 hours. The use of antiplatelet agents that inhibit the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor is not recommended. Urgent anticoagulation using heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins or danaparoid with the goal to treat ischemic stroke patients is not recommended. Secondary prevention by anticoagulation can be used, immediately or within the first days, after minor ischemic stroke or TIA in patients with a high risk for cardioembolism, if uncontrolled hypertension is absent. In patients with large infarcts and a high risk for cardioembolism, the timing for initiating anticoagulation must be decided on a case-by-case basis. In patients with anticoagulation who had an ischemic stroke, the decision to temporarily stop or maintain anticoagulation must be made on a case-by-case basis, depending on thromboembolic risk, level of anticoagulation at stroke onset and estimated risk of hemorrhagic transformation. It is not recommended to use neuroprotective agents in ischemic stroke patients. Patients with cerebral venous thrombosis must be treated with therapeutic doses of heparin, even in case of concomitant intracranial hemorrhage related to cerebral venous thrombosis. If the patient's status worsens despite adequate anticoagulation, thrombolysis may be used in selected cases. The optimal administration route (local or intravenous), thrombolytic agent (urokinase or alteplase) and dose are unknown. There is currently no recommendation with regard to local thrombolytic therapy in patients with dural sinus thrombosis. Urgent blood transfusions are recommended to reduce hemoglobin S to <30% in patients with sickle cell disease and acute ischemic stroke.

Admission clinical characteristics and early clinical outcomes among acute ischemic stroke patients

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between admission clinical characteristics and outcomes at discharge among acute ischemic stroke patients in the Chinese population. A total of 2,673 patients with acute ischemic stroke were included in the present study. The clinical characteristics at admission and other study variables were collected for all patients. The study outcome was defined as neurological deficiency (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score ≥10) at discharge or in-hospital death. Compared with the subjects without neurological deficiency at discharge or in-hospital death, the subjects with neurological deficiency at discharge or in-hospital death had a significantly higher prevalence of hyperglycemia or history of atrial fibrillation at admission. Age ≥ 80 years, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and history of atrial fibrillation were significantly associated with neurological deficiency at discharge or in-hospital death after adjustment for other variables. It is concluded that old age (≥80 years), hyperglycemia, hypertension and history of atrial fibrillation are significantly associated with neurological deficiency at discharge or in-hospital death among patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Perfusion/Diffusion mismatch is valid and should be used for selecting delayed interventions

The mismatch between a larger perfusion lesion and smaller diffusion lesion on magnetic resonance imaging is a validated signal of the ischemic penumbra, namely the region at risk in acute ischemic stroke that is critically hypoperfused and the target of reperfusion therapies. Clinical trials have shown strong correlations between reperfusion in mismatch patients and improved clinical outcomes. Attenuation of infarct growth is associated with reperfusion and corresponding clinical gains. Using computed tomography perfusion, the mismatch between relative cerebral blood flow or cerebral blood volume and perfusion delay is a comparable penumbral marker. Automated techniques allow rapid quantitative assessment of mismatch with thresholding to exclude benign oligemia. The penumbra is often present beyond the current 4.5-h time window, defined for the use of intravenous tPA. Treatment beyond this time point remains investigational. Although the efficacy of thrombolysis in mismatch patients requires further validation in randomized trials, there is now sufficient evidence to recommend that advanced neuroimaging of mismatch should be used for selection of delayed therapies in phase 3 trials.

Does the application of X-ray contrast agents impair the clinical effect of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke patients?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Experimental data suggest a negative interaction between x-ray contrast agents and fibrinolytic efficacy of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA). We hypothesized that the application of a contrast agent before intravenous thrombolysis with rtPA reduces its clinical efficacy in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied consecutive ischemic stroke patients receiving contrast agents for computed tomography angiography before intravenous treatment with rtPA. We compared functional outcomes with an historical control group from the Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study who did not receive contrast agents before thrombolysis with rtPA. Primary end point was favorable functional outcome at 90 days defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 0 to 2. We performed logistic regression analysis and a propensity score matching analysis to estimate the effect size of contrast agent use as a negative predictor of outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 111 patients for the computed tomography angiography and 1119 patients for the control group. Proportions of favorable functional outcome were 47.7% (53/111 patients) for the computed tomography angiography group and 49.5% (542/1094 patients) for the control group (P=0.77). Adjusted probabilities for favorable outcome were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.47-0.54), respectively. Contrast use was associated with reduced odds of favorable outcome (OR, 0.62(;) 95% CI, 0.38-0.99). Propensity score matching suggested a larger effect size (OR, 10.0%; 95% CI, 0.5%-19.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not show a significant negative clinical effect of x-ray contrast agents applied before intravenous thrombolysis with rtPA. However, to confirm a possible small negative interaction between contrast agents and rtPA, additional experimental and prospective clinical studies are needed.

Pharmacological revascularization of acute ischaemic stroke: focus on challenges and novel strategies

The only currently approved treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is alteplase, a thrombolytic agent given intravenously (IV) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, in an attempt to reopen occluded intracerebral arteries. However, no more than 5% of all AIS patients receive IV alteplase, mainly because of too long symptom-onset-to-hospital intervals. Moreover, this strategy is effective for less than half of the patients treated within the therapeutic window. Early recanalization is the most powerful prognostic factor, and novel drugs or therapeutic strategies are primarily aimed at improving alteplase efficacy to rapidly and safely reopen the occluded arteries. Because IV alteplase-resistant thrombi are those with the largest clot burden, responsible for the most devastating brain-tissue infarctions, development of novel approved AIS therapies is an urgent priority. At present, in the absence of controlled trials, no valid recommendations can be made. However, the most promising emerging strategy is a combination of standard or low-dose IV alteplase with an intra-arterial (IA) procedure, including additional endovascular thrombolytic and/or mechanical clot retrieval. Notably, results of open trials using the IA route had relatively disappointing clinical outcomes, despite remarkable arterial recanalization rates. Controlled trials are urgently needed to evaluate strategies including an IA route. In addition, logistic and cost constraints will likely limit their routine use, even in industrialized countries. Combining of another IV drug and IV alteplase is a far less studied option, although much easier to implement. Add-on IV drugs could be an antiplatelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, a direct thrombin inhibitor or a second thrombolytic agent, e.g. tenecteplase. However, neuroimaging to measure the clot burden and infarction size will probably be necessary to predict IV alteplase failure and the subsequent use of these eventual additional therapies.

Plasminogen activation and thrombolysis for ischemic stroke

The plasminogen-activating enzyme system has been exploited and harnessed for therapeutic thrombolysis for nearly three decades. Tissue-type plasminogen activator is still the only thrombolytic agent approved for patients with ischemic stroke. While tissue-type plasminogen activator-induced thrombolysis is proven to be of clear benefit in these patients if administered within 4·5 h poststroke onset, it is surprisingly underused in clinics despite international guidelines and improved acute stroke systems, a situation that requires urgent attention. While tissue-type plasminogen activator has also been shown to have unforeseen roles in the brain that have presented new challenges, tissue-type plasminogen activator and related fibrinolytic agents are currently being assessed over extended time frames. This review will focus on the therapeutic experience and controversies of tissue-type plasminogen activator. Furthermore, we will also provide an overview of recent and current trials assessing tissue-type plasminogen activator and related thrombolytic agents as well as novel approaches for the treatment of ischemic stroke.

Endovascular treatment strategies for acute ischemic stroke

The limitations of intravenous thrombolysis therapy have paved the way for the development of novel endovascular technologies for use in the setting of acute stroke. These technologies range from direct intraarterial thrombolysis to various thrombus disruption or retrieval devices to angioplasty and stenting. The tools in the armamentarium of the neuroendovascular interventionalist enable fast, effective revascularization to be offered to a wider population of patients that may otherwise have few therapeutic options available to them. In this paper, we review the current state-of-the-art in neuroendovascular intervention for acute ischemic stroke. Particular emphasis is placed on delineating the indications and outcomes for use of these various technologies.

ASPECTS and other neuroimaging scores in the triage and prediction of outcome in acute stroke patients

Information obtained from brain imaging is now summarized in the form of various neuroimaging scores to help physicians in making therapeutic decisions and determining prognosis. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was devised to quantify the extent of early ischemic changes in the middle cerebral artery territory on noncontrast computed tomography. With its systematic approach, the score is simple, reliable, and a strong predictor of functional outcome. This review summarizes ASPECTS and other neuroimaging scores developed for risk prognostication and risk stratification with treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Multimodal reperfusion therapy for large hemispheric infarcts in octogenarians: is good outcome a realistic goal?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MMRT may be beneficial in a subset of patients with large hemispheric stroke who cannot be treated with systemic thrombolysis. Because most previous studies only included relatively young patients, the outcome of very old patients given MMRT remains unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with large hemispheric stroke treated with MMRT and admitted to intensive care were included. We compared neurologic and functional outcomes between patients younger and older than 80 years.

RESULTS

We included 14 patients older than 80 years and compared them with 66 patients who were younger than 80. Cerebrovascular risk factor profile, admission NIHSS scores, stroke etiology and pathogenesis, and procedure-related variables did not differ between the groups except for a higher prevalence of smoking in younger patients. Excellent target vessel recanalization (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score of 3) and good outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Score ≤ 2) were more common in younger patients (45% versus 14%, P = .047, and 41% versus 0%, P = .008, respectively). In contrast, mortality rates were higher in octogenarians (43% versus 17%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, very old patients had higher chances of mortality and a very low probability of achieving functional independence even after MMRT. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the futility of MMRT in the very old.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on cerebrovascular disease

Stroke is the sudden onset of focal neurologic symptoms due to ischemia or hemorrhage in the brain. Current FDA-approved clinical treatment of acute ischemic stroke involves the use of the intravenous thrombolytic agent recombinant tissue plasminogen activator given <3 hours after symptom onset, following the exclusion of intracerebral hemorrhage by a noncontrast CT scan. Advanced MRI, CT, and other techniques may confirm the stroke diagnosis and subtype, demonstrate lesion location, identify vascular occlusion, and guide other management decisions but, within the first 3 hours after ictus, should not delay or be used to withhold recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy after the exclusion of acute hemorrhage on noncontrast CT scans. MR diffusion-weighted imaging is highly sensitive and specific for acute cerebral ischemia and, when combined with perfusion-weighted imaging, may be used to identify potentially salvageable ischemic tissue, especially in the period >3 hours after symptom onset. Advanced CT perfusion methods improve sensitivity to acute ischemia and are increasingly used with CT angiography to evaluate acute stroke as a supplement to noncontrast CT. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Risks and Benefits of Thrombolysis in the Elderly

Background and purpose

Stroke incidence continues to rise exponentially with age even as temporal trends in some population risk factors increase and others decline. In general, older patients with stroke have worse outcomes compared to their younger counterparts. Stroke severity, concurrent medical problems, prestroke disability, and less-aggressive acute and chronic management are a few contributing factors to account for this poor prognosis. Acute thrombolysis therapy is the only proven treatment in acute ischemic stroke. However, elderly patients have mostly been excluded from acute revascularization studies, due predominantly to their overall poor prognosis and the fear of hemorrhagic complications from these treatments. Despite this, there is no evidence to suggest that the risk benefit ratio of thrombolysis treatment is substantially different in the elderly than in younger ischemic stroke patients.

Summary of review

In this review, we briefly examine the stroke risk factor profile and outcome in the elderly and review the current evidence regarding intravenous and intra-arterial revascularization treatments.

Conclusion

We feel that carefully selected patients who meet eligibility criteria for thrombolysis should not be denied this therapy on the basis of age alone.

Ischemic stroke--novel therapeutic strategies

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of acute, ischemic stroke has changed markedly during the last two decades. We review existing data for optimizing modern stroke care.

RESULTS

Implementation of stroke units, giving systematic treatment and observation to stroke patients, has lead to a significant reduction in death and dependency. Introduction of intravenous rt-PA (IVT) within 3 h for selected stroke patients and recent extension of the time window to 4.5 h improved the outcome even further. Still, one must consider that IVT has several limitations, such as a narrow time window and several contraindications, and the effect is modest, particularly in strokes with a large vessel occlusion. Recanalization of the occluded vessel is a major predictor for good outcome and should be set as a goal. Intra-arterial rt-PA (IAT) and the concept of bridging therapy (IVT prior to IAT or thrombectomy with a mechanical device) may improve recanalization rates and outcome. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are available for IAT, but not for thrombectomy with devices, and we mostly have retrospective non-controlled data. The Merci- and Penumbra system are the most studied devices, for which recent studies report acceptable safety and efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficiently powered RCTs to evaluate the effect of thrombectomy with mechanical devices are warranted, but as the natural course of a large vessel stroke carries a devastating prognosis, a proactive recanalization approach is justified based on today's knowledge.

Impact of tissue plasminogen activator on the neurovascular unit: from clinical data to experimental evidence

About 15 million strokes occur each year worldwide. As the number one cause of morbidity and acquired disability, stroke is a major drain on public health-care funding, due to long hospital stays followed by ongoing support in the community or nursing-home care. Although during the last 10 years we have witnessed a remarkable progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke, reperfusion induced by recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA-Actilyse) remains the only approved acute treatment by the health authorities. The objective of the present review is to provide an overview of our present knowledge about the impact of tPA on the neurovascular unit during acute ischemic stroke.

Anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and strokes causing impaired consciousness

Coma due to global or focal ischemia or hemorrhage is reviewed. Impaired consciousness due to anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest is common but prognostically problematic. Recent guidelines need to be refined for those patients who have received therapeutic hypothermia. Strokes, both ischemic and hemorrhagic, can affect the level of consciousness by damaging specific brain structures involved in alertness because of widespread cerebral injury or secondary cerebral or systemic complications.

Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis Facilitates Endovascular Mechanical Recanalization in Large Intracranial Artery Occlusion

Background and aims

Acute occlusions of the large intracranial arteries are relatively resistant to intravenous thrombolysis. Therefore, multimodal approaches combining intravenous thrombolysis with endovascular mechanical recanalization are increasingly being applied. In this setting, intravenous thrombolysis may facilitate subsequent mechanical thrombectomy. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the influence of intravenous thrombolysis on net intervention time in subsequent endovascular mechanical recanalization.

Methods

In this retrospective single-center analysis, we compared net intervention time with and without preceding intravenous thrombolysis in patients treated by endovascular mechanical recanalization between 01/2003 and 06/2010. The net intervention time was defined as the interval between the onset of endovascular thrombus manipulation and successful vessel recanalization.

Results

We identified 65 eligible patients, 35 of whom were treated by intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical therapy. Recanalization was achieved in 26 patients with (74%) and 23 patients without preceding intravenous thrombolysis (77%). In the case of successful recanalization, the net intervention time was significantly shorter in patients with preceding intravenous thrombolysis (24·8 ± 22·8 vs. 44·2 ± 40·5 min; P<0·05). This difference remained significant after restricting the analysis to the patients treated by the Penumbra Stroke System© ( n=32). After three-months, patients with preceding intravenous thrombolysis were more likely to be functionally independent (modified Rankin Scale≤2) than those without ( P<0·05).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that preceding intravenous thrombolysis may reduce the intervention time in patients treated by endovascular mechanical recanalization. However, due to the retrospective design of our study, these findings have to be interpreted with caution and need confirmation in a larger patient population.

Angioplasty as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Different endovascular techniques can be employed to achieve vessel recanalization in acute stroke. We assessed whether an endovascular strategy that included angioplasty was safe and effectively recanalized acutely occluded intracranial vessels.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 70 patients that received intra-arterial therapy for acute stroke. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they had received angioplasty as part of their endovascular treatment.

RESULTS

Angioplasty was used in the treatment of 35/70 patients (50%). Median baseline NIHSS was 15. The site of occlusion was at the M1 in 11 patients, M1/M2 in 3, ICA/M1 in 13 and vertebrobasilar in 8 patients. Intravenous thrombolysis was administered to 16/35 patients (46%). Angioplasty was used alone in 4 patients, in combination with intra-arterial thrombolysis in 27 and with a mechanical retrieval device or stent in 13 patients. Recanalization (TICI 2-3) was achieved in 23/35 patients (66%). Median time from symptom onset to recanalization was six hours. In patients where angioplasty was employed, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2/35 (6%), which was similar to patients that were not treated with angioplasty. A favorable functional outcome (mRS=2) was achieved in 20% (7/35) at 24 hour and 34% (12/35) at one month. All patients that had a favorable outcome had recanalized.

CONCLUSION

In this small cohort, an endovascular treatment strategy that employed angioplasty was safe and effectively recanalized acutely occluded intracranial vessels. Angioplasty should be considered as a potential treatment option in interventional acute stroke trials.

Comparison of time to treatment between intravenous and endovascular thrombolytic treatments for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is used to treat acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Endovascular treatment (ET) may provide higher rates of recanalization, but longer time to treatment may limit comparative clinical benefit and widespread applicability.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study compares symptom onset to treatment times in patients who received both IV rt-PA and ET for AIS and its effect on clinical outcome.

METHODS

AIS patients presenting to our facility who received both IV rt-PA and ET were reviewed using them as case and control to match other factors contributing to time to treatment. Good outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 at discharge.

RESULTS

Fifty patients received both treatments with significantly shorter mean symptom onset to time to IV rt-PA compared with symptom onset to time to ET (96.8 ± 39.3 minutes versus 255.3 ± 92.2 minutes, p < 0.001). Patients receiving ET in less time than the mean time had a higher rate of favorable outcome at discharge (45.5% versus 11.8%, p = 0.017) and a significantly lower rate of mortality at three months (15.2% versus 52.9%, p = 0.017) than those receiving it after the mean time. The symptom onset to times to ET was significantly longer in transferred patients compared to primary emergency department patients (299.3 minutes versus 230.5 minutes, p = 0.01)

CONCLUSION

A considerable difference in symptom onset to treatment times between IV and ET was observed among patients with AIS, especially those who were transferred from another facility. Reducing the time to treatment for ET has the potential to improve outcomes among ischemic stroke patients.

Improving reperfusion therapy for acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND

The first generation of clinical reperfusion treatment, intravenous (IV) fibrinolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), was a transformative breakthrough in stroke care, but is far from ideal.

OBJECTIVES

TO survey emerging strategies to increase the efficacy and safety of cerebral reperfusion therapy.

METHODS

Narrative review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Innovative IV pharmacologic reperfusion strategies include: extending IV tPA use to patients with mild deficits; developing novel fibrinolytic agents (tenecteplase, desmetolplase, plasmin); using ultrasound to enhance enzymatic fibrinolysis; combination clot lysis therapies (fibrinolytics with GPIIb/IIIa agents or direct thrombin inhibitors); co-administration of MMP-9 inhibitors to deter haemorrhagic transformation; and prehospital neuroprotection to support threatened tissues until reperfusion. Endovascular recanalisation strategies are rapidly evolving, and include intra-arterial fibrinolysis, mechanical clot retrieval, suction thrombectomy, and primary stenting. Combined approaches appear especially promising, using IV fibrinolysis to rapidly initiate reperfusion, mechanical endovascular treatment to debulk large, proximal thrombi, and intra-arterial (IA) fibrinolysis to clear residual distal thrombus elements and emboli.

Minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using sonothrombolysis

OBJECT

Catheter-based evacuation is a novel surgical approach for the treatment of brain hemorrhage. The object of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound in combination with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) delivered through a microcatheter directly into spontaneous intraventricular (IVH) or intracerebral (ICH) hemorrhage in humans.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients presenting to the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, Washington, with ICH and IVH were screened between November 21, 2008, and July 13, 2009, for entry into this study. Entry criteria included the spontaneous onset of intracranial hemorrhage ≥ 25 ml and/or IVH producing ventricular obstruction. Nine patients (6 males and 3 females, with an average age of 63 years [range 38-83 years]) who met the entry criteria consented to participate and were entered into the trial. A ventricular drainage catheter and an ultrasound microcatheter were stereotactically delivered together, directly into the IVH or ICH. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and 24 hours of continuous ultrasound were delivered to the clot. Gravity drainage was performed. In patients with IVHs, 3 mg of rt-PA was injected; in patients with intraparenchymal hemorrhages, 0.9 mg of rt-PA was injected. The rt-PA was delivered in 3 doses over 24 hours.

RESULTS

All patients had significant volume reductions in the treated hemorrhage. The mean percentage volume reduction after 24 hours of therapy, as determined on CT and compared with pretreatment stability scans, was 59 ± 5% (mean ± SEM) for ICH and 45.1 ± 13% for IVH (1 patient with ICH was excluded from analysis because of catheter breakage). There were no intracranial infections and no significant episodes of rebleeding according to clinical or CT assessment. One death occurred by 30 days after admission. Clinical improvements as determined by a decrease in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score were demonstrated at 30 days after treatment in 7 of 9 patients. The rate of hemorrhage lysis was compared between 8 patients who completed treatment, and patient cohorts treated for IVH and ICH using identical doses of rt-PA and catheter drainage but without the ultrasound (courtesy of the MISTIE [Minimally Invasive Surgery plus T-PA for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation] and CLEAR II [Clot Lysis Evaluating Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage II] studies). Compared with the MISTIE and CLEAR data, the authors observed a faster rate of lysis during treatment for IVH and ICH in the patients treated with sonolysis plus rt-PA versus rt-PA alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Lysis and drainage of spontaneous ICH and IVH with a reduction in mass effect can be accomplished rapidly and safely through sonothrombolysis using stereotactically delivered drainage and ultrasound catheters via a bur hole. A larger clinical trial with catheters specifically designed for brain blood clot removal is warranted.

Current status of endovascular stroke treatment

The management of acute ischemic stroke is rapidly developing.Although acute ischemic stroke is a major cause of adult disability and death, the number of patients requiring emergency endovascular intervention remains unknown, but is a fraction of the overall stroke population. Public health initiatives endeavor to raise public awareness about acute stroke to improve triage for emergency treatment, and the medical community is working to develop stroke services at community and academic medical centers throughout the United States. There is an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–approved pathway for training in endovascular surgical neuroradiology, the specialty designed to train physicians specifically to treat cerebrovascular diseases. Primary and comprehensive stroke center designations have been defined, yet questions remain about the best delivery model. Telemedicine is available to help community medical centers cope with the complexity of stroke triage and treatment. Should comprehensive care be provided at every community center, or should patients with complex medical needs be triaged to major stroke centers with high-level surgical,intensive care, and endovascular capabilities? Although the answers to these and other questions about stroke care delivery remain unanswered owing to the paucity of empirical data, we are convinced that stroke care regionalization is crucial for delivery of high-quality comprehensive ischemic stroke treatment. A stroke team available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week requires specialty skills in stroke neurology, endovascular surgical neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurointensive care, anesthesiology, nursing, and technical support for optimal success. Several physician groups with divergent training backgrounds (i.e., interventional neuroradiology, neurosurgery,neurology, peripheral interventional radiology, and cardiology) lay claim to the treatment of stroke patients,particularly the endovascular or interventional methods. Few would challenge neurologists over the responsibility for emergency evaluation and triage of stroke victims for intra intravenous fibrinolysis, even though emergency physicians are most commonly the first to evaluate these patients. There are many unanswered questions about the role of imaging in defining best treatment. Perfusion imaging with CT or MRI appears to have relevance even though its role remains undefined and is the subject of ongoing research. Meanwhile, investigators are exploring new, and perhaps more specific,imaging methods with cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen and cellular acid-base imbalance. There are currently 6 ongoing trials of stroke intervention, many with proprietary technologies and private funding, competing for the same patient population as multicenter trials funded by the NIH. At the same time, much of the interventional stroke treatment currently occurs outside of trials in the community and academic settings without the collection of much-needed data. Market forces will certainly shape future stroke therapy, but it is unclear whether the current combination of private and public funding for these endeavors is the best method of development.

Intra-arterial stroke therapy: recanalization strategies, patient selection and imaging

With more than 700,000 strokes per year resulting in greater than 160,000 deaths per year, stroke remains the leading cause of disability and third leading cause of death in the United States. Despite an overall decline in stroke mortality over the past 40 years, the total number of stroke deaths continues to increase, suggesting an increase in stroke incidence. The last 20 years of neuroscience advances have moved stroke from a condition that is monitored clinically and imaged serially as it evolves to an entity that can be treated acutely, with remarkable alterations in its natural history.

A cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy as an adjunct to intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator for acute large-vessel ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mechanical thrombectomy has the potential to improve recanalization rates and outcomes for patients with ischemic stroke, but potential gains could be offset by procedural complications and costs. We evaluated the cost and utility of combined intravenous (IV) tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy compared to IV tPA alone for acute large-vessel ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We constructed a decision tree for a hypothetical 68-year-old with a large-vessel ischemic stroke who is eligible for IV tPA. The interventional strategy was IV tPA, a cerebral angiogram, and mechanical thrombectomy and thrombolysis if indicated. Recanalization, hemorrhage complications, and outcomes for the interventional strategy were from the Multi-MERCI study. The medical strategy was IV tPA using inputs from a comprehensive systematic review. Costs were estimated from Medicare reimbursements. We modeled lifetime costs and utilities for disability using a Markov model and Monte-Carlo multivariable sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

For the baseline scenario, the recanalization rate was 72.9% for the interventional strategy and 46.2% for the medical strategy. For the interventional strategy, the symptomatic hemorrhage rate was 8.6% with recanalization and 15.4% without. For the medical strategy, the corresponding rates were 3.6% and 13.3%, respectively. The interventional strategy was cost-effective in 97.6% of simulations (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $16 001/quality-adjusted life year; 95% CI, $2736-$39,232).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on observational data, the combination of IV tPA and mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel ischemic stroke appears to be cost-effective compared to IV tPA alone. These findings require additional validation with randomized trial data.

Safety of high doses of urokinase and reteplase for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

ET is considered in selected patients with AIS with persistent arterial occlusion after receiving IVT. Limited data exist on the safety of IA high doses of UK and RT for ET. We investigated any correlation between IA doses of UK or RT and safety outcomes in patients who underwent ET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all patients from our stroke registry who received UK or RT for ET from 1998 to 2008. Demographics, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, recanalization rates, rates of attempted MT, mortality, SICH, and discharge modified Rankin Scale scores were collected.

RESULTS

Of 197 patients; 72 received UK and 125 received RT. More than 90% of patients in both groups had received prior IVT. The median IA dose of UK was 200,000 U (range, 25,000-1,500,000 U) and of RT was 2 mg (range, 1-8 mg). Concurrent MT was attempted in 59.7% of UK-treated patients and 72.0% of RT-treated patients, with SICH rates of 4.2% and 8.0%, respectively. Logistic regression adjusting for prior IVT and MT revealed no correlation between SICH and doses of UK (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = .94) or RT (OR, 0.803; 95% CI, 0.48-1.33; P = .39). There was no correlation between mortality and doses of UK (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = .51) or RT (OR, 1.048; 95% CI, 0.77-1.42; P = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

High IA doses of UK and RT may be safe when given with or without MT in patients with AIS despite receiving a full dose of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. These results need prospective validation.

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological recanalization strategies in acute ischemic stroke

According to the guidelines of the European Stroke Organization (ESO) and the American Stroke Association (ASA), acute stroke patients should be managed at stroke units that include well organized pre- and in-hospital care. In ischemic stroke the restoration of blood flow has to occur within a limited time window that is accomplished by fibrinolytic therapy. Newer generation thrombolytic agents (alteplase, pro-urokinase, reteplase, tenecteplase, desmoteplase) have shorter half-life and are more fibrin-specific. Only alteplase has Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of acute stroke (1996). The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial proved that alteplase was effective in all subtypes of ischemic strokes within the first 3 h. In the European cooperative acute stroke study III trial, intravenous (IV) alteplase therapy was found to be safe and effective (with some restrictions) if applied within the first 3-4.5 h. In middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion additional transcranial Doppler insonication may improve the breakdown of the blood clot. According to the ESO and ASA guidelines, intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis is an option for recanalization within 6 h of MCA occlusion. Further trials on the IA therapy are needed, as previous studies have involved relatively small number of patients (compared to IV trials) and the optimal IA dose of alteplase has not been determined (20-30 mg is used most commonly in 2 h). Patients undergoing combined (IV + IA) thrombolysis had significantly better outcome than the placebo group or the IV therapy alone in the NINDS trial (Interventional Management of Stroke trials). If thrombolysis fails or it is contraindicated, mechanical devices [e.g., mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischemia (MERCI)- approved in 2004] might be used to remove the occluding clot. Stenting can also be an option in case of acute internal carotid artery occlusion in the future. An intra-aortic balloon was used to increase the collateral blood flow in the Safety and Efficacy of NeuroFlo(™) Technology in Ischemic Stroke trial (results are under evaluation). Currently, there is no approved effective neuroprotective drug.

The Albumin in Acute Stroke Part 1 Trial: an exploratory efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Albumin in Acute Stroke (ALIAS) Part 2 Trial is directly testing whether 2 g/kg of 25% human albumin (ALB) administered intravenously within 5 hours of ischemic stroke onset results in improved clinical outcome. Recruitment into Part 1 of the ALIAS Trial was halted for safety reasons. ALIAS Part 2 is a new, reformulated trial with more-stringent exclusion criteria. Our aim was to explore the efficacy of ALB in the ALIAS Part 1 data and to assess the statistical assumptions underlying the ALIAS Part 2 Trial.

METHODS

ALIAS is a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Data on 434 subjects, comprising the ALIAS Part 1 subjects, were analyzed. We examined both the thrombolysis and nonthrombolysis cohorts combined and separately in a "target population" by excluding subjects who would not have been eligible for the ALIAS Part 2 Trial; the latter comprised patients >83 years of age, those with elevated baseline troponin values, and those with in-hospital stroke. We examined the differences in the primary composite outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 and/or a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days after randomization.

RESULTS

In the combined thrombolysis plus nonthrombolysis cohorts of the target population, 44.7% of subjects in the ALB group had a favorable outcome compared with 36.0% in the saline group (absolute effect size=8.7%; 95% CI, -2.2% to 19.5%). Among thrombolyzed subjects of the target population, 46.7% had a favorable outcome in the ALB group compared with 36.6% in the saline group (absolute effect size=10.1%; 95% CI, -2.0% to 20.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results from the ALIAS Part 1 suggest a trend toward a favorable primary outcome in subjects treated with ALB and support the validity of the statistical assumptions that underlie the ALIAS Part 2 Trial. The ALIAS Part 2 Trial will confirm or refute these results.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ALIAS. Unique identifier: NCT00235495.

Sonothrombolysis: an emerging modality for the treatment of acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke

To date, it is believed that rapid removal of impedances hindering normal blood circulation in the brain would salvage ischemic tissue. Hence, most treatment modalities undergoing clinical evaluation for treatment of stroke are focused on faster recanalization in acute ischemic stroke or faster hematoma mass reduction in hemorrhagic stroke. Therapeutic ultrasound is among the promising emerging modalities being clinically evaluated to meet this purpose. This review provides an overview of existing clinical data in evaluating sonothrombolysis applications in treatment of acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Furthermore, the present status of clinical evaluation of microbubbles as a potential adjuvant to this modality is reviewed.

SYNTHESIS expansion: design of a nonprofit, pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial on the best fast-track endovascular treatment vs. standard intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke

Rationale Reperfusion in ischemic stroke can be pursued by either systemic intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment. However, systemic intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase within 4·5 h of symptom onset in selected patients is the only medication of proven efficacy. No randomized-controlled trials have so far compared the two modalities. To explore this, after a pilot phase, we started the SYNTHESIS Expansion trial. Aims To determine whether endovascular treatment (i.e., intra-arterial thrombolysis with alteplase - if necessary, associated to or substituted by mechanical clot disruption and/or retrieval) compared with systemic intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase, administered according to European labelling, increases the proportion of independent survivors at three-months. Design SYNTHESIS Expansion is an open-label, multicenter randomized-controlled trial, with blinded follow-up. Eligibility applies to; patients with symptomatic ischemic stroke, seen within 4·5 h of onset; being able to initiate intravenous alteplase immediately, and endovascular treatment as soon as possible (not later than six-hours of stroke onset). The study is pragmatically based on the 'uncertainty principle' between endovascular treatment and systemic intravenous thrombolysis for patients eligible for intravenous alteplase. There are no prespecified clinical or instrumental criteria to further select a patient, although investigators are left free to use them. Enrollment will be completed with 350 randomized patients. Primary analysis is on an intent-to-treat basis. Study outcomes Primary: modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 at three-months. Secondary: neurological deficit seven-days after thrombolysis and the safety of the procedure on the basis of events reported within seven-days following thrombolysis - symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, fatal and nonfatal stroke, death from any cause, neurological deterioration.

Intra-arterial treatment methods in acute stroke therapy

Acute revascularization is associated with improved outcomes in ischemic stroke patients. It is unclear which method of intra-arterial intervention, if any, is ideal. Promising approaches in acute stroke treatment are likely a combination of intravenous and endovascular revascularization efforts, combining early treatment initiation with direct clot manipulation and/or PTA/stenting. In this review, we will discuss available thrombolytic therapies and endovascular recanalization techniques, beginning with chemical thrombolytic agents, followed by mechanical devices, and a review of ongoing trials. Further randomized studies comparing medical therapy, intravenous and endovascular treatments are essential, and their implementation will require the wide support and enthusiasm from the neurologic, neuroradiologic, and neurosurgical stroke communities.