101
|
Uyehara CM, Apostolou E. 3D enhancer-promoter interactions and multi-connected hubs: Organizational principles and functional roles. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112068. [PMID: 37059094 PMCID: PMC10556201 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The spatiotemporal control of gene expression is dependent on the activity of cis-acting regulatory sequences, called enhancers, which regulate target genes over variable genomic distances and, often, by skipping intermediate promoters, suggesting mechanisms that control enhancer-promoter communication. Recent genomics and imaging technologies have revealed highly complex enhancer-promoter interaction networks, whereas advanced functional studies have started interrogating the forces behind the physical and functional communication among multiple enhancers and promoters. In this review, we first summarize our current understanding of the factors involved in enhancer-promoter communication, with a particular focus on recent papers that have revealed new layers of complexities to old questions. In the second part of the review, we focus on a subset of highly connected enhancer-promoter "hubs" and discuss their potential functions in signal integration and gene regulation, as well as the putative factors that might determine their dynamics and assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Uyehara
- Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Effie Apostolou
- Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Zhang Q, Hua X, Sun Y, Lin Z, Cao Y, Zhao P, Xia Q. Dynamic chromatin conformation and accessibility changes mediate the spatial-specific gene regulatory network in Bombyx mori. Int J Biol Macromol 2023; 240:124415. [PMID: 37060980 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
Silk gland genes of Bombyx mori can have strict spatial expression patterns, which impact their functions and silk quality; however, our understanding of their regulation mechanisms is currently insufficient. To address this, the middle silk gland (MSG) and posterior silk gland (PSG) of the silkworm were investigated. Gene ontology annotation showed that spatially specific expressed genes were involved in the formation of H3k9me and chromatin topology. Chromatin conformation data generated by Hi-C showed that the topologically associated domain boundaries around FibL and Sericin1 genes were significantly different between MSG and PSG. Changes in chromatin conformation led to changes in chromatin activity, which significantly affected the expression of nearby genes in silkworm. Chromatin accessibility regions of MSG and PSG were analyzed using FAIRE-seq, and 1006 transcription factor motifs were identified in open chromatin regions. Furthermore, the spatial-specific expression patterns of silk gland genes were mainly associated with homeobox-contained transcription factors, such as POU-M2, which was specifically bound and relatively highly expressed in the MSG. The regulatory network mediated by POU-M2 regulated most of the spatial-specific expressed genes in MSG, such as ADH1. These results can aid in improving silk performance, optimizing silkworm breeding, and improving the gene spatial regulatory model research for insects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan Zhang
- Biological Science Research Center, Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (CHONGQING) Science City, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory for Germplasm Creation in Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 400715 Chongqing, China; Engineering Laboratory of Sericultural and Functional Genome and Biotechnology, Development and Reform Commission, 400715 Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaoting Hua
- Biological Science Research Center, Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (CHONGQING) Science City, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory for Germplasm Creation in Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 400715 Chongqing, China; Engineering Laboratory of Sericultural and Functional Genome and Biotechnology, Development and Reform Commission, 400715 Chongqing, China
| | - Yueting Sun
- Biological Science Research Center, Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (CHONGQING) Science City, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory for Germplasm Creation in Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 400715 Chongqing, China
| | - Zhongying Lin
- Biological Science Research Center, Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (CHONGQING) Science City, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China
| | - Yang Cao
- Biological Science Research Center, Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (CHONGQING) Science City, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory for Germplasm Creation in Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 400715 Chongqing, China; Engineering Laboratory of Sericultural and Functional Genome and Biotechnology, Development and Reform Commission, 400715 Chongqing, China.
| | - Ping Zhao
- Biological Science Research Center, Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (CHONGQING) Science City, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory for Germplasm Creation in Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 400715 Chongqing, China; Engineering Laboratory of Sericultural and Functional Genome and Biotechnology, Development and Reform Commission, 400715 Chongqing, China.
| | - Qingyou Xia
- Biological Science Research Center, Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (CHONGQING) Science City, Southwest University, 400715 Chongqing, China; Key Laboratory for Germplasm Creation in Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 400715 Chongqing, China; Engineering Laboratory of Sericultural and Functional Genome and Biotechnology, Development and Reform Commission, 400715 Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Zahedi Y, Zeng S, Ekwall K. An essential role for the Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex in regulation of gene expression during cellular quiescence. Chromosome Res 2023; 31:14. [PMID: 37043046 PMCID: PMC10097750 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-023-09723-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Cellular quiescence is an important physiological state both in unicellular and multicellular eukaryotes. Quiescent cells are halted for proliferation and stop the cell cycle at the G0 stage. Using fission yeast as a model organism, we have previously found that several subunits of a conserved chromatin remodeling complex, Ino80C (INOsitol requiring nucleosome remodeling factor), are required for survival in quiescence. Here, we demonstrate that Ino80C has a key function in the regulation of gene expression in G0 cells. We show that null mutants for two Ino80C subunits, Iec1 and Ies2, a putative subunit Arp42, a null mutant for the histone variant H2A.Z, and a null mutant for the Inositol kinase Asp1 have very similar phenotypes in quiescence. These mutants show reduced transcription genome-wide and specifically fail to activate 149 quiescence genes, of which many are localized to the subtelomeric regions. Using spike in normalized ChIP-seq experiments, we show that there is a global reduction of H2A.Z levels in quiescent wild-type cells but not in iec1∆ cells and that a subtelomeric chromosome boundary element is strongly affected by Ino80C. Based on these observations, we propose a model in which Ino80C is evicting H2A.Z from chromatin in quiescent cells, thereby inactivating the subtelomeric boundary element, leading to a reorganization of the chromosome structure and activation of genes required to survive in quiescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasaman Zahedi
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Neo Building, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Shengyuan Zeng
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Neo Building, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Karl Ekwall
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Neo Building, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Dimond A, Van de Pette M, Taylor-Bateman V, Brown K, Sardini A, Whilding C, Feytout A, Prinjha RK, Merkenschlager M, Fisher AG. Drug-induced loss of imprinting revealed using bioluminescent reporters of Cdkn1c. Sci Rep 2023; 13:5626. [PMID: 37024615 PMCID: PMC10079848 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32747-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetically mediated mechanism that regulates allelic expression of genes based upon parent-of-origin and provides a paradigm for studying epigenetic silencing and release. Here, bioluminescent reporters for the maternally-expressed imprinted gene Cdkn1c are used to examine the capacity of chromatin-modifying drugs to reverse paternal Cdkn1c silencing. Exposure of reporter mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) to 5-Azacytidine, HDAC inhibitors, BET inhibitors or GSK-J4 (KDM6A/B inhibitor) relieved repression of paternal Cdkn1c, either selectively or by inducing biallelic effects. Treatment of reporter fibroblasts with HDAC inhibitors or GSK-J4 resulted in similar paternal Cdkn1c activation, whereas BET inhibitor-induced loss of imprinting was specific to mESCs. Changes in allelic expression were generally not sustained in dividing cultures upon drug removal, indicating that the underlying epigenetic memory of silencing was maintained. In contrast, Cdkn1c de-repression by GSK-J4 was retained in both mESCs and fibroblasts following inhibitor removal, although this impact may be linked to cellular stress and DNA damage. Taken together, these data introduce bioluminescent reporter cells as tools for studying epigenetic silencing and disruption, and demonstrate that Cdkn1c imprinting requires distinct and cell-type specific chromatin features and modifying enzymes to enact and propagate a memory of silencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Dimond
- Epigenetic Memory Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Mathew Van de Pette
- Epigenetic Memory Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
- MRC Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Gleeson Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK
| | - Victoria Taylor-Bateman
- Epigenetic Memory Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Karen Brown
- Epigenetic Memory Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Alessandro Sardini
- Whole Animal Physiology and Imaging, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Chad Whilding
- Microscopy Facility, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Amelie Feytout
- Epigenetic Memory Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Rab K Prinjha
- Immunology and Epigenetics Research Unit, Research, GlaxoSmithKline, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, Herts, UK
| | - Matthias Merkenschlager
- Lymphocyte Development Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Amanda G Fisher
- Epigenetic Memory Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Pecori F, Torres-Padilla ME. Dynamics of nuclear architecture during early embryonic development and lessons from liveimaging. Dev Cell 2023; 58:435-449. [PMID: 36977375 PMCID: PMC10062924 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Nuclear organization has emerged as a potential key regulator of genome function. During development, the deployment of transcriptional programs must be tightly coordinated with cell division and is often accompanied by major changes in the repertoire of expressed genes. These transcriptional and developmental events are paralleled by changes in the chromatin landscape. Numerous studies have revealed the dynamics of nuclear organization underlying them. In addition, advances in live-imaging-based methodologies enable the study of nuclear organization with high spatial and temporal resolution. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge of the changes in nuclear architecture in the early embryogenesis of various model systems. Furthermore, to highlight the importance of integrating fixed-cell and live approaches, we discuss how different live-imaging techniques can be applied to examine nuclear processes and their contribution to our understanding of transcription and chromatin dynamics in early development. Finally, we provide future avenues for outstanding questions in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Pecori
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla
- Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany; Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Luo R, Yan J, Oh JW, Xi W, Shigaki D, Wong W, Cho H, Murphy D, Cutler R, Rosen BP, Pulecio J, Yang D, Glenn R, Chen T, Li QV, Vierbuchen T, Sidoli S, Apostolou E, Huangfu D, Beer MA. Dynamic network-guided CRISPRi screen reveals CTCF loop-constrained nonlinear enhancer-gene regulatory activity in cell state transitions. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.03.07.531569. [PMID: 36945628 PMCID: PMC10028945 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.07.531569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Comprehensive enhancer discovery is challenging because most enhancers, especially those affected in complex diseases, have weak effects on gene expression. Our network modeling revealed that nonlinear enhancer-gene regulation during cell state transitions can be leveraged to improve the sensitivity of enhancer discovery. Utilizing hESC definitive endoderm differentiation as a dynamic transition system, we conducted a mid-transition CRISPRi-based enhancer screen. The screen discovered a comprehensive set of enhancers (4 to 9 per locus) for each of the core endoderm lineage-specifying transcription factors, and many enhancers had strong effects mid-transition but weak effects post-transition. Through integrating enhancer activity measurements and three-dimensional enhancer-promoter interaction information, we were able to develop a CTCF loop-constrained Interaction Activity (CIA) model that can better predict functional enhancers compared to models that rely on Hi-C-based enhancer-promoter contact frequency. Our study provides generalizable strategies for sensitive and more comprehensive enhancer discovery in both normal and pathological cell state transitions.
Collapse
|
107
|
Kyrchanova O, Sokolov V, Tikhonov M, Schedl P, Georgiev P. Transcriptional read through interrupts boundary function in Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.02.16.528790. [PMID: 36824960 PMCID: PMC9949125 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.16.528790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
In higher eukaryotes enhancer-promoter interactions are known to be restricted by the chromatin insulators/boundaries that delimit topologically associated domains (TADs); however, there are instances in which enhancer-promoter interactions span one or more boundary elements/TADs. At present, the mechanisms that enable cross-TAD regulatory interaction are not known. In the studies reported here we have taken advantage of the well characterized Drosophila Bithorax complex (BX-C) to study one potential mechanism for controlling boundary function and TAD organization. The regulatory domains of BX-C are flanked by boundaries which function to block crosstalk with their neighboring domains and also to support long distance interactions between the regulatory domains and their target gene. As many lncRNAs have been found in BX-C, we asked whether transcriptional readthrough can impact boundary function. For this purpose, we took advantage of two BX-C boundary replacement platforms, Fab-7 attP50 and F2 attP , in which the Fab-7 and Fub boundaries, respectively, are deleted and replaced with an attP site. We introduced boundary elements, promoters and polyadenylation signals arranged in different combinations and then assayed for boundary function. Our results show that transcriptional readthrough can interfere with boundary activity. Since lncRNAs represent a significant fraction of Pol II transcripts in multicellular eukaryotes, it is possible that many of them may function in the regulation of TAD organization. Author Summary Recent studies have shown that much genome in higher eukaryotes is transcribed into non-protein coding lncRNAs. It is though that lncRNAs may preform important regulatory functions, including the formation of protein complexes, organization of functional interactions between enhancers and promoters and the maintenance of open chromatin. Here we examined how transcription from promoters inserted into the Drosophila Bithorax complex can impact the boundaries that are responsible for establishing independent regulatory domains. Surprisingly, we found that even a relatively low level of transcriptional readthrough can impair boundary function. Transcription also affects the activity of enhancers located in BX-C regulatory domains. Taken together, our results raise the possibility that transcriptional readthrough may be a widely used mechanism to alter chromosome structure and regulate gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Kyrchanova
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow 119334, Russia,Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow 119334, Russia,Corresponding author: (PG), (PS)
| | - Vladimir Sokolov
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow 119334, Russia
| | - Maxim Tikhonov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow 119334, Russia
| | - Paul Schedl
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA,Corresponding author: (PG), (PS)
| | - Pavel Georgiev
- Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., Moscow 119334, Russia,Corresponding author: (PG), (PS)
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Reece AS, Hulse GK. Clinical Epigenomic Explanation of the Epidemiology of Cannabinoid Genotoxicity Manifesting as Transgenerational Teratogenesis, Cancerogenesis and Aging Acceleration. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3360. [PMID: 36834053 PMCID: PMC9967951 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
As global interest in the therapeutic potential of cannabis and its' derivatives for the management of selected diseases increases, it is increasingly imperative that the toxic profile of cannabinoids be thoroughly understood in order to correctly assess the balance between the therapeutic risks and benefits. Modern studies across a number of jurisdictions, including Canada, Australia, the US and Europe have confirmed that some of the most worrying and severe historical reports of both congenital anomalies and cancer induction following cannabis exposure actually underestimate the multisystem thousand megabase-scale transgenerational genetic damage. These findings from teratogenic and carcinogenic literature are supported by recent data showing the accelerated patterns of chronic disease and the advanced DNA methylation epigenomic clock age in cannabis exposed patients. Together, the increased multisystem carcinogenesis, teratogenesis and accelerated aging point strongly to cannabinoid-related genotoxicity being much more clinically significant than it is widely supposed and, thus, of very considerable public health and multigenerational impact. Recently reported longitudinal epigenome-wide association studies elegantly explain many of these observed effects with considerable methodological sophistication, including multiple pathways for the inhibition of the normal chromosomal segregation and DNA repair, the inhibition of the basic epigenetic machinery for DNA methylation and the demethylation and telomerase acceleration of the epigenomic promoter hypermethylation characterizing aging. For cancer, 810 hits were also noted. The types of malignancy which were observed have all been documented epidemiologically. Detailed epigenomic explications of the brain, heart, face, uronephrological, gastrointestinal and limb development were provided, which amply explained the observed teratological patterns, including the inhibition of the key morphogenic gradients. Hence, these major epigenomic insights constituted a powerful new series of arguments which advanced both our understanding of the downstream sequalae of multisystem multigenerational cannabinoid genotoxicity and also, since mechanisms are key to the causal argument, inveighed strongly in favor of the causal nature of the relationship. In this introductory conceptual overview, we present the various aspects of this novel synthetic paradigmatic framework. Such concepts suggest and, indeed, indicate numerous fields for further investigation and basic science research to advance the exploration of many important issues in biology, clinical medicine and population health. Given this, it is imperative we correctly appraise the risk-benefit ratio for each potential cannabis application, considering the potency, severity of disease, stage of human development and duration of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Stuart Reece
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
| | - Gary Kenneth Hulse
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Cavalheiro GR, Girardot C, Viales RR, Pollex T, Cao TBN, Lacour P, Feng S, Rabinowitz A, Furlong EEM. CTCF, BEAF-32, and CP190 are not required for the establishment of TADs in early Drosophila embryos but have locus-specific roles. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eade1085. [PMID: 36735786 PMCID: PMC9897672 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade1085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The boundaries of topologically associating domains (TADs) are delimited by insulators and/or active promoters; however, how they are initially established during embryogenesis remains unclear. Here, we examined this during the first hours of Drosophila embryogenesis. DNA-FISH confirms that intra-TAD pairwise proximity is established during zygotic genome activation (ZGA) but with extensive cell-to-cell heterogeneity. Most newly formed boundaries are occupied by combinations of CTCF, BEAF-32, and/or CP190. Depleting each insulator individually from chromatin revealed that TADs can still establish, although with lower insulation, with a subset of boundaries (~10%) being more dependent on specific insulators. Some weakened boundaries have aberrant gene expression due to unconstrained enhancer activity. However, the majority of misexpressed genes have no obvious direct relationship to changes in domain-boundary insulation. Deletion of an active promoter (thereby blocking transcription) at one boundary had a greater impact than deleting the insulator-bound region itself. This suggests that cross-talk between insulators and active promoters and/or transcription might reinforce domain boundary insulation during embryogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel R. Cavalheiro
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Collaboration for Joint PhD Degree between EMBL and Heidelberg University, Faculty of Biosciences, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Charles Girardot
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca R. Viales
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Tim Pollex
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - T. B. Ngoc Cao
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Perrine Lacour
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- École Normale Supérieure, 45 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Songjie Feng
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Adam Rabinowitz
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Eileen E. M. Furlong
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, D-69117 Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Kahn TG, Savitsky M, Kuong C, Jacquier C, Cavalli G, Chang JM, Schwartz YB. Topological screen identifies hundreds of Cp190- and CTCF-dependent Drosophila chromatin insulator elements. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eade0090. [PMID: 36735780 PMCID: PMC9897668 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade0090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Drosophila insulators were the first DNA elements found to regulate gene expression by delimiting chromatin contacts. We still do not know how many of them exist and what impact they have on the Drosophila genome folding. Contrary to vertebrates, there is no evidence that fly insulators block cohesin-mediated chromatin loop extrusion. Therefore, their mechanism of action remains uncertain. To bridge these gaps, we mapped chromatin contacts in Drosophila cells lacking the key insulator proteins CTCF and Cp190. With this approach, we found hundreds of insulator elements. Their study indicates that Drosophila insulators play a minor role in the overall genome folding but affect chromatin contacts locally at many loci. Our observations argue that Cp190 promotes cobinding of other insulator proteins and that the model, where Drosophila insulators block chromatin contacts by forming loops, needs revision. Our insulator catalog provides an important resource to study mechanisms of genome folding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatyana G. Kahn
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Chikuan Kuong
- Department of Computer Science, National Chengchi University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | - Giacomo Cavalli
- Institute of Human Genetics, UMR9002 CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | - Jia-Ming Chang
- Department of Computer Science, National Chengchi University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
111
|
Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in Three Drosophila Model Systems. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032855. [PMID: 36769179 PMCID: PMC9917889 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In higher eukaryotes, the regulation of developmental gene expression is determined by enhancers, which are often located at a large distance from the promoters they regulate. Therefore, the architecture of chromosomes and the mechanisms that determine the functional interaction between enhancers and promoters are of decisive importance in the development of organisms. Mammals and the model animal Drosophila have homologous key architectural proteins and similar mechanisms in the organization of chromosome architecture. This review describes the current progress in understanding the mechanisms of the formation and regulation of long-range interactions between enhancers and promoters at three well-studied key regulatory loci in Drosophila.
Collapse
|
112
|
Acemel RD, Lupiáñez DG. Evolution of 3D chromatin organization at different scales. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2023; 78:102019. [PMID: 36603519 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2022.102019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Most animal genomes fold in 3D chromatin domains called topologically associated domains (TADs) that facilitate interactions between cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and promoters. Owing to their critical role in the control of developmental gene expression, we explore how TADs have shaped animal evolution. In the light of recent studies that profile TADs in disparate animal lineages, we discuss their phylogenetic distribution and the mechanisms that underlie their formation. We present evidence indicating that TADs are plastic entities composed of genomic strata of different ages: ancient cores are combined with newer regions and brought into extant TADs through genomic rearrangements. We highlight that newly incorporated TAD strata enable the establishment of new CRE-promoter interactions and in turn new expression patterns that can drive phenotypical innovation. We further highlight how subtle changes in chromatin folding may fine-tune the expression levels of developmental genes and hold a potential for evolutionary significance.
Collapse
|
113
|
van Mierlo G, Pushkarev O, Kribelbauer JF, Deplancke B. Chromatin modules and their implication in genomic organization and gene regulation. Trends Genet 2023; 39:140-153. [PMID: 36549923 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Regulation of gene expression is a complex but highly guided process. While genomic technologies and computational approaches have allowed high-throughput mapping of cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and their interactions in 3D, their precise role in regulating gene expression remains obscure. Recent complementary observations revealed that interactions between CREs frequently result in the formation of small-scale functional modules within topologically associating domains. Such chromatin modules likely emerge from a complex interplay between regulatory machineries assembled at CREs, including site-specific binding of transcription factors. Here, we review the methods that allow identifying chromatin modules, summarize possible mechanisms that steer CRE interactions within these modules, and discuss outstanding challenges to uncover how chromatin modules fit in our current understanding of the functional 3D genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido van Mierlo
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olga Pushkarev
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Judith F Kribelbauer
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bart Deplancke
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
|
115
|
Abstract
In animals, the sequences for controlling gene expression do not concentrate just at the transcription start site of genes, but are frequently thousands to millions of base pairs distal to it. The interaction of these sequences with one another and their transcription start sites is regulated by factors that shape the three-dimensional (3D) organization of the genome within the nucleus. Over the past decade, indirect tools exploiting high-throughput DNA sequencing have helped to map this 3D organization, have identified multiple key regulators of its structure and, in the process, have substantially reshaped our view of how 3D genome architecture regulates transcription. Now, new tools for high-throughput super-resolution imaging of chromatin have directly visualized the 3D chromatin organization, settling some debates left unresolved by earlier indirect methods, challenging some earlier models of regulatory specificity and creating hypotheses about the role of chromatin structure in transcriptional regulation.
Collapse
|
116
|
Abstract
Hox genes encode evolutionarily conserved transcription factors that are essential for the proper development of bilaterian organisms. Hox genes are unique because they are spatially and temporally regulated during development in a manner that is dictated by their tightly linked genomic organization. Although their genetic function during embryonic development has been interrogated, less is known about how these transcription factors regulate downstream genes to direct morphogenetic events. Moreover, the continued expression and function of Hox genes at postnatal and adult stages highlights crucial roles for these genes throughout the life of an organism. Here, we provide an overview of Hox genes, highlighting their evolutionary history, their unique genomic organization and how this impacts the regulation of their expression, what is known about their protein structure, and their deployment in development and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine A. Hubert
- Program in Genetics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Deneen M. Wellik
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Preissl S, Gaulton KJ, Ren B. Characterizing cis-regulatory elements using single-cell epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 2023; 24:21-43. [PMID: 35840754 PMCID: PMC9771884 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00509-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cell type-specific gene expression patterns and dynamics during development or in disease are controlled by cis-regulatory elements (CREs), such as promoters and enhancers. Distinct classes of CREs can be characterized by their epigenomic features, including DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, combinations of histone modifications and conformation of local chromatin. Tremendous progress has been made in cataloguing CREs in the human genome using bulk transcriptomic and epigenomic methods. However, single-cell epigenomic and multi-omic technologies have the potential to provide deeper insight into cell type-specific gene regulatory programmes as well as into how they change during development, in response to environmental cues and through disease pathogenesis. Here, we highlight recent advances in single-cell epigenomic methods and analytical tools and discuss their readiness for human tissue profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Preissl
- Center for Epigenomics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Kyle J Gaulton
- Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Diabetes Research Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Bing Ren
- Center for Epigenomics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Can changes in 3D genome architecture create new regulatory landscapes that contribute to phenotypic evolution? Essays Biochem 2022; 66:745-752. [PMID: 36250960 DOI: 10.1042/ebc20220057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Animal genomes are compartmentalized into insulated regulatory units named topology-associated domains (TADs). TADs insulate gene promoters from enhancers that occupy neighboring TADs. Chromosomal rearrangements that disrupt TAD structure can generate new regulatory interactions between enhancers and promoters that were once separated into different TADs, which might lead to new gene expression patterns. On the one hand, TAD rearrangements are known to cause deleterious phenotypes, but, on the other hand, rearrangements can also create novel expression patterns that may be selected during evolution because they generate advantageous phenotypes. Here, we review recent studies that explore the effects of chromosomal rearrangements and genetic perturbations on TAD structure and gene regulation in the context of development and evolution. We discuss the possible contribution of evolutionary breakpoints (EBRs) that affect TAD structure to the evolution of gene regulation and the phenotype.
Collapse
|
119
|
Kyrchanova OV, Bylino OV, Georgiev PG. Mechanisms of enhancer-promoter communication and chromosomal architecture in mammals and Drosophila. Front Genet 2022; 13:1081088. [PMID: 36531247 PMCID: PMC9751008 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1081088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The spatial organization of chromosomes is involved in regulating the majority of intranuclear processes in higher eukaryotes, including gene expression. Drosophila was used as a model to discover many transcription factors whose homologs play a key role in regulation of gene expression in mammals. According to modern views, a cohesin complex mostly determines the architecture of mammalian chromosomes by forming chromatin loops on anchors created by the CTCF DNA-binding architectural protein. The role of the cohesin complex in chromosome architecture is poorly understood in Drosophila, and CTCF is merely one of many Drosophila architectural proteins with a proven potential to organize specific long-range interactions between regulatory elements in the genome. The review compares the mechanisms responsible for long-range interactions and chromosome architecture between mammals and Drosophila.
Collapse
|
120
|
Unveiling dynamic enhancer–promoter interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Soc Trans 2022; 50:1633-1642. [DOI: 10.1042/bst20220325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proper enhancer–promoter interactions are essential to maintaining specific transcriptional patterns and preventing ectopic gene expression. Drosophila is an ideal model organism to study transcriptional regulation due to extensively characterized regulatory regions and the ease of implementing new genetic and molecular techniques for quantitative analysis. The mechanisms of enhancer–promoter interactions have been investigated over a range of length scales. At a DNA level, compositions of both enhancer and promoter sequences affect transcriptional dynamics, including duration, amplitude, and frequency of transcriptional bursting. 3D chromatin topology is also important for proper enhancer–promoter contacts. By working competitively or cooperatively with one another, multiple, simultaneous enhancer–enhancer, enhancer–promoter, and promoter–promoter interactions often occur to maintain appropriate levels of mRNAs. For some long-range enhancer–promoter interactions, extra regulatory elements like insulators and tethering elements are required to promote proper interactions while blocking aberrant ones. This review provides an overview of our current understanding of the mechanism of enhancer–promoter interactions and how perturbations of such interactions affect transcription and subsequent physiological outcomes.
Collapse
|
121
|
Richter WF, Nayak S, Iwasa J, Taatjes DJ. The Mediator complex as a master regulator of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2022; 23:732-749. [PMID: 35725906 PMCID: PMC9207880 DOI: 10.1038/s41580-022-00498-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The Mediator complex, which in humans is 1.4 MDa in size and includes 26 subunits, controls many aspects of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) function. Apart from its size, a defining feature of Mediator is its intrinsic disorder and conformational flexibility, which contributes to its ability to undergo phase separation and to interact with a myriad of regulatory factors. In this Review, we discuss Mediator structure and function, with emphasis on recent cryogenic electron microscopy data of the 4.0-MDa transcription preinitiation complex. We further discuss how Mediator and sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factors enable enhancer-dependent regulation of Pol II function at distal gene promoters, through the formation of molecular condensates (or transcription hubs) and chromatin loops. Mediator regulation of Pol II reinitiation is also discussed, in the context of transcription bursting. We propose a working model for Mediator function that combines experimental results and theoretical considerations related to enhancer-promoter interactions, which reconciles contradictory data regarding whether enhancer-promoter communication is direct or indirect. We conclude with a discussion of Mediator's potential as a therapeutic target and of future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Richter
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Shraddha Nayak
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Janet Iwasa
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Dylan J Taatjes
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Bauer M. How does an organism extract relevant information from transcription factor concentrations? Biochem Soc Trans 2022; 50:1365-1376. [PMID: 36111776 PMCID: PMC9704516 DOI: 10.1042/bst20220333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
How does an organism regulate its genes? The involved regulation typically occurs in terms of a signal processing chain: an externally applied stimulus or a maternally supplied transcription factor leads to the expression of some downstream genes, which, in turn, are transcription factors for further genes. Especially during development, these transcription factors are frequently expressed in amounts where noise is still important; yet, the signals that they provide must not be lost in the noise. Thus, the organism needs to extract exactly relevant information in the signal. New experimental approaches involving single-molecule measurements at high temporal precision as well as increased precision in manipulations directly on the genome are allowing us to tackle this question anew. These new experimental advances mean that also from the theoretical side, theoretical advances should be possible. In this review, I will describe, specifically on the example of fly embryo gene regulation, how theoretical approaches, especially from inference and information theory, can help in understanding gene regulation. To do so, I will first review some more traditional theoretical models for gene regulation, followed by a brief discussion of information-theoretical approaches and when they can be applied. I will then introduce early fly development as an exemplary system where such information-theoretical approaches have traditionally been applied and can be applied; I will specifically focus on how one such method, namely the information bottleneck approach, has recently been used to infer structural features of enhancer architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Bauer
- Bionanoscience Department, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, 2629 Delft, The Netherlands
- Joseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A
- Lewis–Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Marchal C, Singh N, Batz Z, Advani J, Jaeger C, Corso-Díaz X, Swaroop A. High-resolution genome topology of human retina uncovers super enhancer-promoter interactions at tissue-specific and multifactorial disease loci. Nat Commun 2022; 13:5827. [PMID: 36207300 PMCID: PMC9547065 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33427-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromatin organization and enhancer-promoter contacts establish unique spatiotemporal gene expression patterns in distinct cell types. Non-coding genetic variants can influence cellular phenotypes by modifying higher-order transcriptional hubs and consequently gene expression. To elucidate genomic regulation in human retina, we mapped chromatin contacts at high resolution and integrated with super-enhancers (SEs), histone marks, binding of CTCF and select transcription factors. We show that topologically associated domains (TADs) with central SEs exhibit stronger insulation and augmented contact with retinal genes relative to TADs with edge SEs. Merging genome-wide expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) with topology map reveals physical links between 100 eQTLs and corresponding eGenes associated with retinal neurodegeneration. Additionally, we uncover candidate genes for susceptibility variants linked to age-related macular degeneration and glaucoma. Our study of high-resolution genomic architecture of human retina provides insights into genetic control of tissue-specific functions, suggests paradigms for missing heritability, and enables the dissection of common blinding disease phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Marchal
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
- In silichrom Ltd, First Floor, Angel Court, 81 St Clements St, Oxford, OX4 1AW, UK
| | - Nivedita Singh
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Zachary Batz
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Jayshree Advani
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Catherine Jaeger
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Ximena Corso-Díaz
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Anand Swaroop
- Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, MSC0610, 6 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Fleck K, Raj R, Erceg J. The 3D genome landscape: Diverse chromosomal interactions and their functional implications. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:968145. [PMID: 36036013 PMCID: PMC9402908 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.968145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome organization includes contacts both within a single chromosome and between distinct chromosomes. Thus, regulatory organization in the nucleus may include interplay of these two types of chromosomal interactions with genome activity. Emerging advances in omics and single-cell imaging technologies have allowed new insights into chromosomal contacts, including those of homologs and sister chromatids, and their significance to genome function. In this review, we highlight recent studies in this field and discuss their impact on understanding the principles of chromosome organization and associated functional implications in diverse cellular processes. Specifically, we describe the contributions of intra-chromosomal, inter-homolog, and inter-sister chromatid contacts to genome organization and gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Fleck
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Romir Raj
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Jelena Erceg
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Keränen SVE, Villahoz-Baleta A, Bruno AE, Halfon MS. REDfly: An Integrated Knowledgebase for Insect Regulatory Genomics. INSECTS 2022; 13:618. [PMID: 35886794 PMCID: PMC9323752 DOI: 10.3390/insects13070618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We provide here an updated description of the REDfly (Regulatory Element Database for Fly) database of transcriptional regulatory elements, a unique resource that provides regulatory annotation for the genome of Drosophila and other insects. The genomic sequences regulating insect gene expression-transcriptional cis-regulatory modules (CRMs, e.g., "enhancers") and transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs)-are not currently curated by any other major database resources. However, knowledge of such sequences is important, as CRMs play critical roles with respect to disease as well as normal development, phenotypic variation, and evolution. Characterized CRMs also provide useful tools for both basic and applied research, including developing methods for insect control. REDfly, which is the most detailed existing platform for metazoan regulatory-element annotation, includes over 40,000 experimentally verified CRMs and TFBSs along with their DNA sequences, their associated genes, and the expression patterns they direct. Here, we briefly describe REDfly's contents and data model, with an emphasis on the new features implemented since 2020. We then provide an illustrated walk-through of several common REDfly search use cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angel Villahoz-Baleta
- Center for Computational Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA; (A.V.-B.); (A.E.B.)
- New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Andrew E. Bruno
- Center for Computational Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA; (A.V.-B.); (A.E.B.)
- New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Marc S. Halfon
- New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Program in Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Bateman JR, Johnson JE. Altering enhancer-promoter linear distance impacts promoter competition in cis and in trans. Genetics 2022; 222:6617354. [PMID: 35748724 PMCID: PMC9434180 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In Drosophila, pairing of maternal and paternal homologs can permit trans-interactions between enhancers on one homolog and promoters on another, an example of a phenomenon called transvection. When chromosomes are paired, promoters in cis and in trans to an enhancer can compete for the enhancer's activity, but the parameters that govern this competition are as yet poorly understood. To assess how the linear spacing between an enhancer and promoter can influence promoter competition in Drosophila, we employed transgenic constructs wherein the eye-specific enhancer GMR is placed at varying distances from a heterologous hsp70 promoter driving a fluorescent reporter. While GMR activates the reporter to a high degree when the enhancer and promoter are spaced by a few hundred base pairs, activation is strongly attenuated when the enhancer is moved 3 kilobases away. By examining transcription of endogenous genes near the point of transgene insertion, we show that linear spacing of 3 kb between GMR and the hsp70 promoter results in elevated transcription of neighboring promoters, suggesting a loss of specificity between the enhancer and its intended transgenic target promoter. Furthermore, increasing spacing between GMR and hsp70 by just 100 bp can enhance transvection, resulting in increased activation of a promoter on a paired homolog at the expense of a promoter in cis to the enhancer. Finally, cis-/trans-promoter competition assays in which one promoter carries mutations to key core promoter elements show that GMR will skew its activity toward a wild type promoter, suggesting that an enhancer is in a balanced competition between its potential target promoters in cis and in trans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack R Bateman
- Biology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
127
|
Interplay between regulatory elements and chromatin topology in cellular lineage determination. Trends Genet 2022; 38:1048-1061. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
128
|
Meyer BJ. The X chromosome in C. elegans sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2022; 74:101912. [PMID: 35490475 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2022.101912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abnormalities in chromosome dose can reduce organismal fitness and viability by disrupting the balance of gene expression. Unlike imbalances in chromosome dose that cause pathologies, differences in X-chromosome dose that determine sex are well tolerated. Dosage compensation mechanisms have evolved in diverse species to balance X-chromosome gene expression between sexes. Mechanisms underlying nematode X-chromosome counting to determine sex revealed how small quantitative differences in molecular signals are translated into dramatically different developmental fates. Mechanisms underlying X-chromosome dosage compensation revealed the interplay between chromatin modification and three-dimensional chromosome structure imposed by an X-specific condensin complex to regulate gene expression over vast chromosomal territories. In a surprising twist of evolution, this dosage-compensation condensin complex also regulates lifespan and tolerance to proteotoxic stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara J Meyer
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, 16 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Abstract
Enhancers control the establishment of spatiotemporal gene expression patterns throughout development. Over the past decade, the development of new technologies has improved our capacity to link enhancers with their target genes based on their colocalization within the same topological domains. However, the mechanisms that regulate how enhancers specifically activate some genes but not others within a given domain remain unclear. In this Review, we discuss recent insights into the factors controlling enhancer specificity, including the genetic composition of enhancers and promoters, the linear and 3D distance between enhancers and their target genes, and cell-type specific chromatin landscapes. We also discuss how elucidating the molecular principles of enhancer specificity might help us to better understand and predict the pathological consequences of human genetic, epigenetic and structural variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomás Pachano
- Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology of Cantabria (IBBTEC), CSIC/Universidad de Cantabria/SODERCAN, Albert Einstein 22, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Endika Haro
- Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology of Cantabria (IBBTEC), CSIC/Universidad de Cantabria/SODERCAN, Albert Einstein 22, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Alvaro Rada-Iglesias
- Institute of Biomedicine and Biotechnology of Cantabria (IBBTEC), CSIC/Universidad de Cantabria/SODERCAN, Albert Einstein 22, 39011 Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Levo M, Raimundo J, Bing XY, Sisco Z, Batut PJ, Ryabichko S, Gregor T, Levine MS. Transcriptional coupling of distant regulatory genes in living embryos. Nature 2022; 605:754-760. [PMID: 35508662 PMCID: PMC9886134 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04680-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The prevailing view of metazoan gene regulation is that individual genes are independently regulated by their own dedicated sets of transcriptional enhancers. Past studies have reported long-range gene-gene associations1-3, but their functional importance in regulating transcription remains unclear. Here we used quantitative single-cell live imaging methods to provide a demonstration of co-dependent transcriptional dynamics of genes separated by large genomic distances in living Drosophila embryos. We find extensive physical and functional associations of distant paralogous genes, including co-regulation by shared enhancers and co-transcriptional initiation over distances of nearly 250 kilobases. Regulatory interconnectivity depends on promoter-proximal tethering elements, and perturbations in these elements uncouple transcription and alter the bursting dynamics of distant genes, suggesting a role of genome topology in the formation and stability of co-transcriptional hubs. Transcriptional coupling is detected throughout the fly genome and encompasses a broad spectrum of conserved developmental processes, suggesting a general strategy for long-range integration of gene activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Levo
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - João Raimundo
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Xin Yang Bing
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Zachary Sisco
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Philippe J Batut
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Sergey Ryabichko
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas Gregor
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Joseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, UMR3738, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
| | - Michael S Levine
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Abstract
[Figure: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Gaskill
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Melissa Harrison
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|