Proteomic-based discovery and characterization of glycosylated eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and COOH-terminal osteopontin fragments for ovarian cancer in urine

Urinary mesothelin provides greater sensitivity for early stage ovarian cancer than serum mesothelin, urinary hCG free beta subunit and urinary hCG beta core fragment

OBJECTIVES

Early detection of ovarian cancer should improve overall survival. Multiple serum markers have been evaluated as possible tests to detect early stage disease, but few urine markers have been studied. Mesothelin has been detected in serum from patients with ovarian cancer, but has not been previously reported in urine.

METHODS

Mesothelin was assayed in the serum and in the urine from 28 patients with early stage (I/II) invasive epithelial ovarian cancers, 111 with advanced stage (III/IV) invasive disease and 19 with tumors of low malignant potential. Marker values have been compared to those in healthy controls and 115 patients with benign pelvic masses. Thresholds were set to include 95% of mesothelin values for 127 sera and 89 urines from healthy women. Urine values were considered: (1) as assayed; (2) normalized using the ratio of serum to urine creatinine; and (3) normalized using the Cockroft-Gault formula for glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Urines were also assayed for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) free beta subunit and beta subunit core fragment and similarly normalized.

RESULTS

Optimal sensitivity for early stage disease was obtained when urine mesothelin was normalized using GFR. A greater fraction of patients with early stage disease was detected with the mesothelin urine assay (42%) than with the serum assay (12%). Similarly, 75% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer had elevated mesothelin in urine compared to 48% in serum. Serum and urine levels of mesothelin correlated for early (p=0.02) and late (p<0.001) disease. Urine mesothelin exhibited greater sensitivity for early stage ovarian cancer than did hCG free beta subunit or beta subunit core fragment and complementarity was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Urine mesothelin deserves further evaluation as a biomarker for detection of early stage ovarian cancer in combination with other urinary markers.

Diagnostic potential for urinary proteomics

Urine represents a modified ultrafiltrate of plasma, with protein concentrations typically approximately 1000-fold lower than plasma. Urine’s low protein concentration might suggest it to be a less promising diagnostic specimen than plasma. However, urine can be obtained noninvasively and tests of many urinary proteins are well-established in clinical practice. Proteomic technologies expand opportunities to analyze urinary proteins, identifying more than 1000 proteins and peptides in urine. Urine offers a sampling of most plasma proteins, with increased proportions of low-molecular-weight protein and peptide components. Urine also offers enriched sampling of proteins released along the urinary tract. Although urine presents some challenges as a diagnostic specimen, its diverse range of potential markers offers great potential for diagnosis of both systemic and kidney diseases. Examples of clinical situations where this may be of value are for more sensitive detection of kidney transplant rejection or of renal toxicity of medications.

Osteopontin in metastatic lesions as a prognostic marker in ovarian cancers

Osteopontin (OPN) is expressed in various human cancers and associated with tumor progression, invasion and metastasis in many manners. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical significance of OPN expression in metastatic lesions of ovarian cancers, since the prognosis of the patients with peritoneal dissemination is extremely poor. In primary tumors and peritoneal metastatic lesions from 40 patients with stage III ovarian cancers, the protein levels of OPN and histoscores were determined by enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Immunohistochemical staining revealed OPN was distributed in the cytoplasm and nuclear compartments of the cancer and stromal cells within and around the tumor. The OPN level was significantly (p < 0.05) increased in 32 of 40 metastatic lesions of ovarian cancers. The OPN increased cases identified by immunohistochemical staining were consistent with those identified by the sandwich immunoassay. The prognosis of the 32 patients with significant increase of OPN in ovarian cancers was extremely poor, whereas the 36-month survival rate of the 8 patients with no increase of OPN was 75%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the levels of OPN were independent predictors of prognosis from clinical characteristics (age, lesion size, histological types). OPN might be associated with peritoneal metastasis and its advancement, and that the OPN level in metastatic lesion may be a prognostic indicator in ovarian cancers.

Plasma osteopontin is an independent prognostic marker for head and neck cancers

PURPOSE

To confirm the relationship between plasma osteopontin (OPN) levels and treatment outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients in an expanded study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC were enrolled onto this study, 54 previously reported and 86 new patients. Pretreatment plasma OPN levels were assessed in all patients by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. OPN levels were correlated to treatment outcomes in the new group of patients. Detailed analyses were also performed on the relationship between OPN and tumor control rate, event-free survival (EFS), and postrelapse survival for the entire group.

RESULTS

Using a previously defined cut off point of 450 ng/mL, there was a significant correlation between OPN and freedom-from-relapse (P = .047), overall survival (P = .019), and EFS (P = .023) in the new, independent patient cohort (n = 86). Sequence of event analyses using the entire group (N = 140) revealed that OPN was an independent prognostic factor for initial tumor control, EFS in those who have achieved tumor control, and postrelapse survival.

CONCLUSION

In this expanded study, we were able to replicate the prognostic significance of OPN using a predefined cut off point in an independent patient group and demonstrated that plasma OPN is an independent prognostic marker for HNSCC.

Human body fluid proteome analysis

The focus of this article is to review the recent advances in proteome analysis of human body fluids, including plasma/serum, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, synovial fluid, nipple aspirate fluid, tear fluid, and amniotic fluid, as well as its applications to human disease biomarker discovery. We aim to summarize the proteomics technologies currently used for global identification and quantification of body fluid proteins, and elaborate the putative biomarkers discovered for a variety of human diseases through human body fluid proteome (HBFP) analysis. Some critical concerns and perspectives in this emerging field are also discussed. With the advances made in proteomics technologies, the impact of HBFP analysis in the search for clinically relevant disease biomarkers would be realized in the future.

The RNase a superfamily: Generation of diversity and innate host defense

The Ribonuclease A superfamily includes an extensive network of distinct and divergent gene lineages. Although all ribonucleases of this superfamily share invariant structural and catalytic elements and some degree of enzymatic activity, the primary sequences have diverged significantly, ostensibly to promote novel function. We will review the literature on the evolution and biology of the RNase A ribonuclease lineages that have been characterized specifically as involved in host defense including: (1) RNases 2 and RNases 3, also known as the eosinophil ribonucleases, which are rapidly-evolving cationic proteins released from eosinophilic leukocytes, (2) RNase 7, an anti-pathogen ribonuclease identified in human skin, and (3) RNase 5, also known as angiogenin, another rapidly-evolving ribonuclease known to promote blood vessel growth with recently-discovered antibacterial activity. Interestingly, some of the characterized anti-pathogen activities do not depend on ribonuclease activity per se. We discuss the ways in which the anti-pathogen activities characterized in vitro might translate into experimental confirmation in vivo. We will also consider the possibility that other ribonucleases, such as the dimeric bovine seminal ribonuclease and the frog oocyte ribonucleases, may have host defense functions and therapeutic value that remain to be explored. (190 words).

Congenital heart disease and pregnancy

Patients with congenital heart disease who wish to become pregnant offer a challenge to obstetricians, cardiologists and anesthetists. Although no large randomized trials exist to support the management of this emerging population, small prospective and retrospective studies provide valuable data on the likely success of pregnancy and the risks involved. Recently, there is emerging consensus on the management of this specialized group of patients, and this article aims to provide the practitioner with an overview of patient needs and the issues to be addressed. All patients with congenital heart disease wishing to consider pregnancy should be referred for specialist assessment prior to conception. Maternal risk, fetal risk and recurrence risk in the fetus should all be addressed. Most women with congenital heart disease can undergo pregnancy without significant risk. However, for some women the risk of maternal death is high, including those with: severe aortic stenosis, impaired left ventricular function, pulmonary hypertension and Marfan syndrome with dilated aortic root. All patients should be offered a detailed 20-week fetal cardiac scan and, in certain cases, prepregnancy genetic counseling. Most patients can deliver vaginally, with cesarean section reserved for obstetric indications or patients in whom straining at delivery could be potentially fatal (i.e., those with Marfan syndrome, aortic aneurysm, severe fixed left heart obstruction, or the acutely unwell mother). Antibiotic prophylaxis should be given routinely in labor to all patients in whom dental prophylaxis is indicated.

Proteomic analysis in cancer research: potential application in clinical use

The ultimate goal of cancer proteomics is to adapt proteomic technologies for routine use in clinical laboratories for the purpose of diagnostic and prognostic classification of disease states, as well as in evaluating drug toxicity and efficacy. The novel technologies allows researchers to facilitate the comprehensive analyses of genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes in health and disease. The information that is expected from such technologies may soon exert a dramatic change in cancer research and impact dramatically on the care of cancer patients. Analysis of tumor-specific proteomic profiles may also allow better understanding of tumor development and the identification of novel targets for cancer therapy. The localization of gene products, which is often difficult to deduce from the sequence, can be determined experimentally. Mechanisms, such as regulation of protein function by proteolysis, recycling, and isolation in cell compartments, affect gene products, not genes. Finally, protein-protein interactions and the molecular composition of cellular structures can be determined only at the protein level. The biological variability among patient samples as well as the great dynamic range of biomarker concentrations are currently the main challenges facing efforts to deduce diagnostic patterns that are unique to specific disease states. While several strategies exist to address this problem, we have tried to offer a wide perspective about the current possibilities.

Discovery of urinary biomarkers

A myriad of proteins and peptides can be identified in normal human urine. These are derived from a variety of sources including glomerular filtration of blood plasma, cell sloughing, apoptosis, proteolytic cleavage of cell surface glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins, and secretion of exosomes by epithelial cells. Mass spectrometry-based approaches to urinary protein and peptide profiling can, in principle, reveal changes in excretion rates of specific proteins/peptides that can have predictive value in the clinical arena, e.g. in the early diagnosis of disease, in classification of disease with regard to likely therapeutic responses, in assessment of prognosis, and in monitoring response to therapy. These approaches have potential value, not only in diseases of the kidney and urinary tract but also in systemic diseases that are associated with circulating small protein and peptide markers that can pass the glomerular filter. Most large scale biomarker discovery studies reported thus far have used one of two approaches to identify proteins and peptides whose excretion in urine changes in specific disease states: 1) two-dimensional electrophoresis with mass spectrometric and/or immunochemical identification of proteins and 2) top-down mass spectrometric methods (SELDI-TOF-MS and capillary electrophoresis-MS). These studies have been chiefly in the areas of nephrology, urology, and oncology. We review these applications, focusing on two areas of progress, viz. in bladder cancer and in acute rejection of renal transplants. Progress has been limited so far. However, with the advent of powerful LC-MS/MS methods along with methods for quantifying LC-MS/MS output, there is hope for an accelerated discovery and validation of disease biomarkers in urine.