European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations

Safety and effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: an international multicenter case-control study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) who are receiving antithrombotic therapy is unknown. Our primary aim was to assess the safety of POEM in this patient subset. Secondary outcomes were rates of clinical success, GERD, and procedure-related outcomes.

METHODS

This was an international, 1:1, case-control study performed at 10 centers using prospectively maintained databases. All consecutive patients who underwent POEM before November 2019 were considered for inclusion. Cases were patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. Controls not receiving antithrombotics were matched for age and esophageal motility disorder. Primary outcomes were major bleeding and thromboembolic events on postprocedural day 30.

RESULTS

Of 2895 patients who underwent POEM, 126 cases (103 on antiplatelets, 35 anticoagulants, 12 both) and 126 controls were enrolled. The rate of major bleeding was higher for the antithrombotics users (5.6% vs 0.8%, P = .03). Anticoagulants and clopidogrel were temporarily interrupted in all cases. Aspirin was continued in 40.5% of users without increasing the bleeding risk. One thromboembolic event occurred in each group (0.79%; P = 1.00). No POEM-related deaths were noted. Rates of clinical success (91.7% vs 96% in controls, P = .20), postprocedural GERD, and technical-related outcomes were similar in both groups. Antithrombotic management was heterogeneous, and guidelines were not adhered to in 23.8% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM is safe and effective in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy although it is associated with a greater risk of major bleeding.

[Functional Exams in the gastroenterology - new developments and tips for the common practice]

The functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) have a high prevalence and are associated with high healthcare costs. The diagnosis of these diseases could be difficult and require func-tional tests such as high-resolution manometry (HRM) of the esophagus, anorectal manometry and H2-Breathtests. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and the fear of infections there was a marked reduction in the number of performed exams in the last months - nevertheless some exams are necessary, in order to exclude or to diagnose important and dangerous diseases like Achalasia. Goal of this article is to present some new and relevant developments in the field. The HRM of the esophagus is the diagnostic standard for Achalasia, a rare clinical condi-tion associated to dysphagia - new European guidelines suggests a safe strategy in perform-ing the pneumatic dilatation.The intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO) is a clinical condition caused by a high production of methane in the small intestine due to overgrowth of Methanobrevibacter smithii, this condition could be in some patients associated with irritable bowel syndrome.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Achalasia: Two Distinct Nosologic Entities or a Possible Etiopathogenic Association?

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that researchers have made significant progress in elucidating the pathophysiology of esophageal diseases, the understanding of esophageal motility alterations in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is in its infancy and current published medical literature remains rather scarce on this topic. A growing body of scientific data regarding associations between esophageal motor disorders, such as achalasia and EoE, exists nowadays.

SUMMARY

It seems that the association of EoE and achalasia does not constitute a cause and effect relationship, as it is not clear whether esophageal motility abnormalities are the result of EoE or vice versa. As such, there is no universally accepted treatment algorithm for patients presenting with both of these entities. Key Messages: The aim of this article is to review the existing data on achalasia-like motility disorders in patients with EoE, highlighting a possible association between these 2 esophageal disorders. Moreover, we seek to describe the clinical presentation in such cases, diagnostic modalities to be used, and current treatment strategies in patients suspected to suffer from both disorders.

Lung Nodule and Food Bolus Impaction: Can They Be Related?

Achalasia is a rare primary disorder of esophageal motility characterized by insufficient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and loss of esophageal peristalsis. This results in patient complaints of dysphagia to solids and liquids, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. However, achalasia may also present with respiratory symptoms, such as aspiration pneumonia, due to remarkable regurgitation. In untreated patients and a long period of evolution, respiratory symptoms may even be the initial manifestation of achalasia. An endoscopic finding of retained food and saliva with a puckered gastroesophageal junction or barium swallow showing dilated esophagus with birds beaking in a symptomatic patient should prompt appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. We describe an atypical presentation of a rare disease in a young man with a history of symptoms caused by the late manifestation of achalasia.

A Bitter Pill to Swallow: Pseudoachalasia Secondary to Oesophageal Deviation Resulting from Mediastinal Shift and Left Atrial Enlargement after Left Lower Lobectomy

Pseudoachalasia, also known as secondary achalasia, is a rare clinical condition mimicking idiopathic achalasia but unrelated to primary loss of nitrergic innervation. It has mostly been attributed to malignancy infiltrating the oesophageal wall, but several other benign underlying pathologies have been reported. Because of similar manometric appearance, high-resolution manometry (HRM) of the oesophagus alone cannot distinguish between idiopathic achalasia and pseudoachalasia. Misdiagnosis can result in ineffective treatment by dilatation or even more invasive therapy. This is the first case-report of pseudoachalasia secondary to oesophageal deviation resulting from mediastinal shift and left atrial enlargement following prior left lower lobectomy. HRM, the gold standard for the diagnosis of achalasia, confirmed the incomplete relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) in absence of normal oesophageal peristalsis. However, additional workup with CAT scan and cardiac ultrasound identified an anatomical shift by the extrinsic mass effect resulting from the atrial enlargement, but without contrast retention at the LES.

Achalasia: physiology and diagnosis

Achalasia is a rare motility disorder with incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and ineffective contractions of the esophageal body. It has been hypothesized that achalasia does not result from only one pathway but rather involves a combination of infectious, autoimmune, and familial etiological components. On the basis of other observations, a novel hypothesis suggests that a muscular form of eosinophilic esophagitis is involved in the pathophysiology of achalasia in some patients. This appears to progressively diminish the myenteric plexus at stage III, gradually destroy it at stage II, and finally eliminate it at stage I, the most advanced and final stage of achalasia. Although high-resolution manometry has identified these three different types of achalasia, another subset of patients with a normal-appearing sphincter relaxation has been proposed. Provocative maneuvers, such as the rapid drinking challenge, have recently been demonstrated to improve diagnosis in certain borderline patients, but have to be studied in more detail. However, whether the different types of achalasia will have a long-term impact on tailored therapies is still a matter of debate. Additionally, novel aspects of the standard timed barium swallow appear to be an important adjunct of diagnosis, as it has been shown to have a diagnostic as well as a predictive value.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Presently, the primary endoscopic options for the treatment of achalasia are peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and pneumatic dilation. But the clinical outcomes of POEM and pneumatic dilation for achalasia have not yet to be fully evaluated. So, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between the two treatment modalities. We searched all the relevant studies published up to September 2019 examining the comparative efficacy between POEM and pneumatic dilation. Outcomes included success rate, Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter pressure and adverse events. Outcomes were documented by pooled risk ratios and mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) using Review Manager 5.3. Seven studies with a total of 619 patients were identified. There were 298 patients underwent POEM treatment and 321 patients underwent pneumatic dilation treatment. The clinical success rate was higher in the POEM group than that in the pneumatic dilation group at 6, 12 and 24 months' follow-up, with a risk ratio of 1.14 (95% CI, 1.06-1.22, P = 0.0002, I= 0%), 1.34 (95% CI, 1.24-1.45, P < 0.00001, I= 17%) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.10-1.65, P = 0.004, I= 70%), respectively. The change of Eckardt scores was more obvious in the POEM group than in the pneumatic dilation group, with a mean difference of 1.19 (95% CI, 0.78-1.60, P < 0.00001, I= 70%). The rate of gastroesophageal reflux and other complications for POEM was significantly higher than for pneumatic dilation, with a risk ratio of 4.17 (95% CI, 1.52-11.45, P = 0.006, I= 61%) and 3.78 (95% CI, 1.41-10.16, P = 0.008, I= 0%). Our current evidence suggests that the long-term efficacy of POEM was superior to that of pneumatic dilation, but accompanied by higher complications.

UEG framework for the development of high-quality clinical guidelines

The 48 national member societies and 17 specialist member societies which operate under the umbrella of United European Gastroenterology (UEG) increasingly develop clinical practice guidelines for both national and international implementation. The methodologies and strategies used in these guidelines vary considerably. The UEG Quality of Care Taskforce aimed to provide a framework for quality guidelines in order to assist member societies in the process of developing guidelines, and to provide a tool for readers of guidelines to critically appraise their quality. We outline the steps necessary to begin the guideline development process, how to build working groups, how to search for evidence, how to grade the quality of the evidence, how to reach consensus on statements and how to write the guideline document. We believe that using this framework will increase the potential to produce a high-quality guideline which is transparent, independent, reproducible and implementable.

Esophageal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP): How Can FLIP Enhance Your Clinical Practice?

Recent innovations in esophageal diagnostic testing have enhanced gastroenterology clinical practice by facilitating more nuanced and advanced evaluation of esophageal symptoms. Among these pivotal advances is the FDA-approved functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), which utilizes impedance planimetry via volumetric distension of a catheter-mounted balloon at the time of sedated upper endoscopy, to acquire esophageal dimensions and pressures. In real time, FLIP can display cross-sectional areas (CSA) and distensibility indices (ratios of CSA to intra-balloon pressures) throughout the esophagus, most notably at the esophagogastric junction, as well as secondary peristaltic esophageal body contractile patterns. As the use of FLIP has progressively spread and permeated into the practice of clinical gastroenterology since its introduction, increasing data on and experiences with its applications have accumulated to guide its utility in clinical practice. In this current review developed for gastroenterologists and foregut surgeons across clinical practice, we provide an introduction to FLIP technology and metrics and discuss the clinical scenarios in which performance of or referral for FLIP may be helpful in the evaluation and management of patients with commonly encountered esophageal symptoms and disorders. Specifically, we discuss the potential applications and limitations of FLIP as a complementary diagnostic modality in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia, established or suspected achalasia spectrum disorders, eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease and those undergoing esophageal surgery.

Development of a Multinational Clinical Practice Guideline: A Practical Structured Procedure

INTRODUCTION

The development of a clinical guideline is a challenging process. National and international organizations have established a variety of approaches, grading systems, evaluation scales, and voting modes; however, a practical description which illustrates all steps from starting the initiative to publication and dissemination of the guideline is usually not provided. We describe a structured guideline procedure that can be adjusted to the requirements of other multinational guidelines.

METHODS

A group of European specialist gastroenterological societies and national societies initiated a guideline for the use of breath tests in gastroenterology. A balance between scientific evidence and clinical experience was achieved by involving European specialist societies and physicians from 18 European countries. For persons contributing to the guideline process, different levels of involvement were defined. The tasks were assigned to different groups of persons, which formed scientific institutions.

RESULTS

We describe organizational structures and institutions, the stepwise approach, and illustrate the multistep guideline development procedure in a flowchart diagram that shows workflow and assigned responsibilities and provides details for the execution of each step, including timelines. The process is split into 4 phases: foundation, preparation, voting, and publication.

DISCUSSION

This structured procedure of a gastroenterological clinical practice guideline can serve as a blueprint for future multinational guideline initiatives and may aid future attempts to standardize and harmonize guideline development processes in gastroenterology and in other medical fields. Although the described procedure is for a diagnostic guideline, it may also be appropriate for therapeutic guidelines by adjusting the acceptance criteria for recommendations.

Achalasia: what to do in the face of failures of Heller myotomy

Achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus, and while there are several treatment options, there is no consensus regarding them. When therapeutic intervention for achalasia fails, a careful evaluation of the cause of the persistent or recurrent symptoms using upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and contrast radiologic studies is required to understand the cause of therapy failure and guide plans for subsequent treatment. Options for reintervention are the same as for primary intervention and include pneumatic dilation, botulinum toxin injection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, or redo esophageal myotomy. When reintervention fails or if the esophagus is not amenable to intervention and the disease is considered end-stage, esophagectomy is the last option to manage recurrent achalasia.

Recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association on Clinical Use of High-Resolution Manometry in Diagnosis of Esophageal Disorders

Aim. Current recommendations of the Russian Gastroenterological Association on clinical use of high-resolution manometry in diagnosis of esophageal disorders are intended to assist in clinical decision making, terminology standardisation and interpretation of clinical data.

Key points. In 2018, a joint meeting of the Russian Gastroenterological Association and Russian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Group approved unified terminology and classification of esophageal motor function disorders for high-resolution manometry diagnosis.

Gastrointestinal patient complaints typically concern esophageal disorders such as dysphagia, regurgitation, heart-burn, chest pain or belching. To exclude erosive and ulcerative lesions, eosinophilic esophagitis and organic changes, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and biopsy are recommended in pre-treatment. Upon excluding mucosal lesions and esophageal lumen obstruction as causal for symptoms, use of high-resolution manometry is recommended. This method of esophageal examination has become the “gold standard” in diagnosis of motor disorders.

High-resolution manometry enables detailed investigation of integral quantitative and qualitative characteristics of esophagus motor function and specific related disorders, analysis of esophageal contractile propagation and strictly coordinated synchronous peristalsis of upper esophageal sphincter, esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter, which malfunction may provoke development of achalasia, esophagospasm, hiatal hernia, ineffective eso pha geal motility and other motor disorders.

Conclusion. High-resolution manometry is a relatively new method for study of esophagus motor function gaining increasingly wide application in clinical practice. It enables a medical professional to obtain evidence that may critically affect the choice of optimal patient care strategy and effective treatment. Current recommendations are based on an extensive review of up-to-date information and will be updated with new corpus of clinical data and assessment emerging in evidential medicine to provide gastroenterologists country-wide with latest scientific and practical guidelines.