Haploidentical BMT for severe aplastic anemia with intensive GVHD prophylaxis including posttransplant cyclophosphamide

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation for aplastic anemia: the current advances and future challenges

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Finding a suitable matched donor in a timely manner is a challenge. The availability of haploidentical donors and their successful use in transplantation have expanded valid choices for SAA. In recent decades, haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) for the treatment of SAA has been continuously attempted, and great strides have been made. Nowadays, haplo-HSCT using different regimens has overcome the difficulty of graft failure and severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and achieved inspiring survival outcomes in SAA. The regimens consist mainly of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus antithymocyte globulin (ATG), posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), and ex vivo graft T-cell depletion (TCD). In particular, the G-CSF and ATG-based regimen includes the largest sample size and the successful wide use of the G-CSF and ATG-based regimen has promoted haplo-HSCT a higher priority in SAA patients without matched related or unrelated donors in China. Recent studies have also indicated that haplo-HSCT using PT-Cy or TCD regimen is a practicable alternative, but the sample size is relatively small. Here, we offer an overview of clinical results obtained through the use of haploidentical transplantation in SAA, mainly focusing on current advances and future challenges.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aplastic anemia: current indications and transplant strategies

Treatment options for newly diagnosed aplastic anemia (AA) patient includes upfront allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or immunosuppressive therapy (IST). With recent advances in supportive care, conditioning regimens and post-transplant immunosuppression the overall survival for HSCT approaches 70-90%. Transplant eligibility needs to be assessed considering age, comorbidities, donor availability and probability of response to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Upfront HSCT should be offered to children and young adults with matched related donor (MRD). Upfront HSCT may also be offered to children and young adults with rapidly available matched unrelated donor (MUD) who require urgent HSCT. Bone marrow (BM) graft source and cyclosporine (CsA) plus methotrexate (MTX) as graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis are preferable when using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) based conditioning regimens. Alemtuzumab is an acceptable alternative to ATG and is used with CsA alone and with either BM or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Cyclophosphamide (CY) plus ATG conditioning is preferable for patients receiving MRD transplant, while Fludarabine (Flu) based conditioning is reserved for older adults, those with risk factors of graft failure and those receiving MUD HSCT. For haploidentical transplant, use of low dose radiotherapy and post-transplant cyclophosphamide has resulted in a marked reduction in graft failure and GVHD.

Outcomes of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation using Total Body Irradiation (600 cGy) and Fludarabine with Antithymocyte Globulin in Adult Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Prospective Phase II Study

The aim of this study was to verify the feasibility of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG; 5 mg/kg) in combination with 600 cGy of fractionated total body irradiation (fTBI; 3 doses of 200 cGy) and fludarabine (Flu; 150 mg/m2) as a conditioning regimen for haploidentical stem cell transplantation from a related mismatched donor (haplo-SCT) in adult patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). We analyzed 47 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-SCT, including 24 patients from our previous pilot report. The median age was 36.0 years (range, 17 to 61 years), and 25 patients (53%) were very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA) at transplantation. All patients achieved primary engraftment. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥II acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic moderate or greater GVHD was 27.7% at 100 days and 13.5% at 3 years, respectively. With a median follow-up of 32.3 months, the 3-year probability of overall survival and failure-free survival was 91.0% and 88.6%, respectively. The 3-year GVHD- and failure-free survival (GFFS) was 71.6%. Offspring donor and lower comorbidity index were independent factors correlated with higher GFFS in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the outcomes of haplo-SCT with fTBI 600 cGy/Flu/ATG-5 indicate that haplo-SCT can be an effective alternative option when a fully matched donor is not available or a patient with VSAA needs an urgent transplantation.

A study of human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells transplantation combined with allogenic mesenchymal stem cell infusion for treatment of severe aplastic anemia in pediatric and adolescent patients

The clinical applications of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (haplo‐HSCT) have offered most of the young severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients an opportunity to accept curative therapy at the early stage of bone marrow lesions. However, the outcome of juvenile SAA patients received haplo‐HSCT remain to be improved due to high incidence of graft failure and graft vs host disease (GVHD). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been characterized by their hematopoiesis‐supporting and immunomodulatory properties. In the current study, we designed a combination of haplo‐HSCT with allogenic MSC for treatment of SAA in pediatric and adolescent patients and evaluated its effects. Juvenile patients (<18 years) with SAA (n = 103) were given HLA‐haploidentical HSC combined with allogenic MSC after a conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and antithymocyte globulin and an intensive GVHD prophylaxis, including cyclosporine, short‐term methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and basiliximab. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved in 102 of 103 patients in a median time of 14.3 days (range 9‐25 days). The median time of platelet engraftment was 25.42 days (range 8‐93 days). The cumulative incidence of II‐IV acute GVHD at day +100 was 26.32% ± 0.19% and III‐IV acute GVHD was 6.79% ± 0.06% at day +100, respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 25.56% ± 0.26%. The overall survival was 87.15% ± 3.3% at a median follow‐up of 40 (1.3‐98) months. Our data suggest that cotransplantation of HLA‐haploidentical HSC and allogenic mesenchymal stem cell may provide an effective and safe treatment for children and adolescents with SAA who lack matched donors.

Impact of CD34 Cell Dose and Conditioning Regimen on Outcomes after Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Relapsed/Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening disease that can be cured with allogeneic cell transplantation (HCT). Haploidentical donor transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (haplo-PTCy) is an option for patients lacking an HLA-matched donor. We analyzed 87 patients who underwent haplo-PTCy between 2010 and 2019. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 1 to 69 years), most were heavily transfused, and all received previous immunosuppression (25% without antithymocyte globulin). Almost two-thirds (63%) received standard fludarabine (Flu)/cyclophosphamide (Cy) 29/total body irradiation (TBI) 200 cGy conditioning, and the remaining patients received an augmented conditioning: Flu/Cy29/TBI 300-400 (16%), Flu/Cy50/TBI 200 (10%), or Flu/Cy50/TBI 400 (10%). All patients received PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Most grafts (93%) were bone marrow (BM). The median duration of follow-up was 2 years and 2 months. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 17 days. Primary graft failure occurred in 15% of the patients, and secondary or poor graft function occurred in 5%. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 14%, and that of chronic GVHD was 9%. Two-year overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) were 79% and 70%, respectively. EFS was higher for patients who received augmented Flu/Cy/TBI (hazard ratio [HR], .28; P = .02), and those who received higher BM CD34 cell doses (>3.2 × 10E6/kg) (HR, .29; P = .004). The presence of donor-specific antibodies before HSCT was associated with lower EFS (HR, 3.92; P = .01). Graft failure (HR, 7.20; P < .0001) was associated with an elevated risk of death. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was frequent (62%). Haploidentical HCT for SAA is a feasible procedure; outcomes are improved with augmented conditioning regimens and BM grafts with higher CD34 cell doses.

Evolution of the role of haploidentical stem cell transplantation: past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

The accessibility to haplo-donors has led to an increase in the number of haplo-HSCT worldwide. A systematic search of the PubMed database between 2000 to present was performed.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discussed the most used approaches to perform haplo-HSCT and its results: T-cell depletion (TCD, including Perugia platform and its modifications) and T-cell repleted haplo (TCR, including the high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide strategy (Baltimore protocol) and the Beijing protocol). The improvements and modifications made to the different strategies have increased the indications of haplo-HSCT, including both malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Focusing on the Baltimore protocol, the authors review the results of the retrospective studies that have compared it to other donor transplants. The limitations of this strategy in terms of toxicity, graft complications, and GVHD are also discussed in detail. Finally, possible approaches to improve the outcomes of TCR haplo-HSCT are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent advances in the field of haplo-HSCT have allowed a large number of patients with incurable diseases to benefit from this procedure despite not having a matched donor. With all available strategies, virtually no patient who needs an allogeneic transplant should be excluded by the absence of a donor.