Health belief model predicts adherence to CPAP before experience with CPAP

Low socioeconomic status is a risk factor for CPAP acceptance among adult OSAS patients requiring treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether socioeconomic status (SES) has a role in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients' decision to accept continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; patients were recruited between March 2007 and December 2007.

SETTING

University-affiliated sleep laboratory.

PATIENTS

162 consecutive newly diagnosed (polysomnographically) adult OSAS patients who required CPAP underwent attendant titration and a 2-week adaptation period.

RESULTS

40% (n = 65) of patients who required CPAP therapy accepted this treatment. Patients accepting CPAP were older, had higher apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and higher income level, and were more likely to sleep in a separate room than patients declining CPAP treatment. More patients who accepted treatment also reported receiving positive information about CPAP treatment from family or friends. Multiple logistic regression (after adjusting for age, body mass index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and AHI) revealed that CPAP purchase is determined by: each increased income level category (OR, 95% CI) (2.4; 1.2-4.6), age + 1 year (1.07; 1.01-1.1), AHI ( > or = 35 vs. < 35 events/hr) (4.2, 1.4-12.0), family and/or friends with positive experience of CPAP (2.9, 1.1-7.5), and partner sleeps separately (4.3, 1.4-13.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the already known determinants of CPAP acceptance, patients with low SES are less receptive to CPAP treatment than groups with higher SES. CPAP support and patient education programs should be better tailored for low SES people in order to increase patient treatment initiation and adherence.

Psychological variables as predictors of adherence to treatment by continuous positive airway pressure

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We examined whether psychological variables enable us to predict adherence to CPAP in order to construct a predictive model to identify patients at risk of abandoning treatment.

METHOD

One hundred and twenty-two Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) patients were studied before and one month after beginning CPAP treatment. All patients completed four psychological evaluation instruments before CPAP treatment: a health perception questionnaire (Nottingham Health Profile: NHP), a mental health rating scale (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: HADS) and two disease-specific questionnaires that measure the patient's understanding of OSA and its treatment (Apnea Knowledge Test: AKT) and his attitudes to OSA and CPAP (Apnea Beliefs Scale: ABS).

RESULTS

Thirty percent of the participants were non-adherent at one month. Decision-tree analysis indicated that it was possible to correctly classify 85.7% of non-adherent patients using three baseline factors (Emotional reactions score [NHP], age, and total score on ABS). Logistic regression analyses confirmed these two psychological variables as independent predictors of adherence.

CONCLUSION

Assessing psychological well-being and subjective health status at onset of CPAP enables the identification of patients at risk of abandoning CPAP treatment. This subgroup could then be targeted early to receive supportive and educational measures to improve adherence rates.

Optimal treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and excessive sleepiness

INTRODUCTION

Collapsibility of the upper airway in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) causes repeated arousals from sleep, decreased oxygen saturation of the blood, and excessive sleepiness (ES). Patients with OSA are at increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, and experience occupational and vehicular accidents more frequently than the general population. Furthermore, the life expectancy of patients with untreated OSA is significantly reduced.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search of articles published between 2003 and 2008 was conducted using the search terms: obstructive sleep apnea [ti/ab] AND treatment; obstructive sleep apnoea [ti/ab] AND treatment; and excessive sleepiness [ti/ab] AND treatment. Searches were limited to articles in English; clinical trials; meta-analyses; practice guidelines; randomized, controlled trials; and reviews.

RESULTS

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the reference-standard treatment for patients with OSA. CPAP addresses the symptoms of OSA and reduces the risk of heart disease and depression associated with this sleep disorder. However, the efficacy of CPAP is contingent on patient adherence, and >or=4 hours of therapy per night are required for patients with OSA to experience significant clinical benefits. However, reports of nonadherence to CPAP therapy range from 29% to 83%. Other therapies are available for patients who refuse or cannot adhere to CPAP treatment, including dental devices and surgery, but these treatments are generally considered to be less efficacious. A significant number of patients continue to experience residual ES despite CPAP treatment. Pharmacologic therapies, eg, modafinil and armodafinil, may be of use in patients with OSA to improve tolerance with CPAP or to address residual ES.

CONCLUSION

There are a variety of treatments available for patients with OSA. Successful treatment involves encouraging patient compliance with CPAP or oral appliances. Primary-care physicians play a crucial role in recognizing this disorder and ensuring the best possible outcome through support and education.