Methotrexate and rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease

Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction Improves Arthritis and Pathological Damage of Heart and Lung in TNF-Tg Mice

Background: Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction (HGWD) is a traditional and effective Chinese medicine compound decoction for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is few research on the treatment of rheumatoid cardiopulmonary complications. The present study was to study whether HGWD can alleviate the pathological changes caused by rheumatoid arthritis and cardiopulmonary complications.

Methods: Five 3-month-old TNF-Tg mice were treated with HGWD (9.1 g/kg) once a day or the same dose of normal saline lasted for 8 weeks, and wild-type littermates of the same age were used as a negative control, and methotrexate (MTX) was intraperitoneally administered as a positive control. After the treatment, pathological staining was performed on the mouse ankle joints, heart, and lungs.

Result: It was found that HGWD reduced the inflammation of the ankle joint synovium in TNF-Tg mice, and reduced myocardial hypertrophy, inflammatory infiltration and fibrosis of heart, as well as lung inflammation and fibrosis. Immunohistochemical staining with anti-TNF-α antibody showed that HGWD reduced the expression of TNF-α in the heart of TNF-Tg mice.

Conclusion: In conclusion, HGWD alleviates joint inflammation in TNF-Tg mice and reduces the pathological changes of the heart and lungs.

Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Practical Review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease, which primarily causes symmetric polyarthritis. An extrarticolar involvement is common, and the commonly involved organ is lungs. Although cardiac disease is responsible for most RA-related deaths, pulmonary disease is also a major contributor, accounting for ~10-20% of all mortality. Pulmonary disease is a common (60-80% of patients with RA) extra-articular complication of RA. Optimal screening, diagnostic, and treatment strategies of pulmonary disease remain uncertain, which have been the focus of an ongoing investigation. Clinicians should regularly assess patients with RA for the signs and symptoms of pulmonary disease and, reciprocally, consider RA and other connective tissue diseases when evaluating a patient with pulmonary disease of an unknown etiology. RA directly affects all anatomic compartments of the thorax, including the lung parenchyma, large and small airways, pleura, and less commonly vessels. In addition, pulmonary infection and drug-induced lung disease associated with immunosuppressive agents used for the treatment of RA may occur.

Healthcare Professionals' Compliance with the Standard Management Guidelines towards the Use of Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is complicated, with numerous aspects influencing decision-making, including disease severity, comorbidities, and patient preferences. The present study aimed to evaluate healthcare professionals' (HCPs) knowledge of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and their compliance with the standard management guidelines for assuring optimal RA therapy. The cross-sectional, survey-based study was performed in various healthcare and academic settings in Karachi, Pakistan to probe HCPs' knowledge of bDMARDs and their compliance with the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of RA patients. Overall, n = 413 questionnaires were included in our study (response rate: 82.6%). The physicians were further well-informed about the indications (n = 276, 91.3%, p = 0.001) and monitoring requirements (n = 258, 85.4%, p = 0.004). The pharmacists were more knowledgeable about the drug targets (n = 96, 86.4%, p = 0.029) and their mechanisms of action (n = 80, 72.0%, p = 0.013). Male respondents as compared with females (41.3% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.04), and physicians as compared with pharmacists (40.7% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.012), were more confident in using bDMARDs than conventional treatment in RA patients. Our findings show that the respondents were familiar with the attributes of bDMARDs and the standard management guidelines for RA care. Our results may be relevant in creating new methods, guidelines, and treatments to enhance RA treatment adherence, satisfaction, and health outcomes.

Prevalent Drug Usage Practices in Adults and Children With Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Registry-Based Analysis From the MyoCite Cohort

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) form a heterogeneous group of disorders with a deficit of quality evidence regarding its management. Therefore, we aimed to explore the prevalent treatment practices in the MyoCite cohort from India.

METHODS

Drug usage patterns, their predictors, drug retention rates, efficacy, and adverse drug reactions were analyzed for adults and children newly diagnosed with IIM (2017-2020) and followed prospectively and compared with real-world data by performing a medical records review. GraphPad Prism version 8.4.2 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of 181 adults (male-to-female ratio, 1:4.6) and 30 children (M:F, 1.3:1), dermatomyositis (41% adults, 93% children) was the most common subtype. Methotrexate (MTX) was the drug of choice (67% adult, 90% children) followed by azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The MMF, AZA, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (RTX) were preferred for those with antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD) and those with lung involvement, whereas MTX was avoided in them. Functional class and family income did not determine drug preferences. Glucocorticoids were initiated at a lower dose in overlap myositis (45% vs 80%, p = 0.001), and the time to achieve the lowest dose of glucocorticoids was longer than 24 months for ASSD (77% vs 14%, p = 0.002).Over a median of 35 months, the overall retention rate was the highest for RTX (75%) followed by MTX (58%). Relapse-free survival was the highest for RTX followed by MTX. The most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse drug reactions for MTX and MMF, inefficacy for AZA, and cost for RTX.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first analysis of drug usage and retention in patients with IIM in Northern India, MTX emerged as the most preferred drug in both adults and children, with the exception of those with ASSD or lung disease. Organ involvement and subtype of IIM are key determinants of drug preference. Overall, RTX and MTX were well-tolerated with high retention rates, followed by AZA and MMF.

The Safety of Antirheumatic Drugs

Background

Drug therapy for rheumatic diseases has changed fundamentally in recent decades with the introduction of many new agents. As these drugs may have to be taken for many years, and many of them are of similar efficacy, the safety profiles of the individual substances play an important role in therapeutic decision-making.

Method

This review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search on the safety profiles of selected antirheumatic drugs.

Results

Non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate, biological agents, and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are all used to treat rheumatic diseases. Register and trial data show that antirheumatic treatments are relatively safe. Infections, in particular, are much less common than initially expected. Cortisone administration is an exception because of its severe long-term sequelae. Biological agents are associated with severe infectious events at a rate of 4–5 events per 100 patient years. Screening before treatment with biological agents has been shown to lower the rate of tuberculosis from 564 to 95 cases per 100 000 patient years. JAK inhibitors have a good safety profile, with respect to infections as well, but there is evidence of their association with cardiovascular problems, malignancies, and thrombosis.

Conclusion

A suitable, safe antirheumatic drug can be chosen for each patient in consideration of individual risk profiles. Regular monitoring enables the early detection of adverse effects. The risk profile of JAK inhibitors, in particular, will be studied in further trials.

Choosing pharmacotherapy for ILD in patients with connective tissue disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a well-recognised complication of several connective tissue diseases (CTD). This article outlines the various treatment options for the most common CTD-ILDs and discuss the ongoing research in this field. https://bit.ly/39NHwx6.

Protective effect of methotrexate on lung function and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis–related interstitial lung disease: a retrospective cohort study

Background:

Studies on the risk and protective factors for lung function decline and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis–related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) are limited.

Objectives:

We aimed to investigate clinical factors and medication uses associated with lung function decline and mortality in RA-ILD.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study examined the medical records of patients with RA-ILD who visited Severance Hospital between January 2006 and December 2019. We selected 170 patients with RA-ILD who had undergone at least one spirometry test and chest computed tomography scan. An absolute decline of ⩾10% in the functional vital capacity (FVC) was defined as significant decline in pulmonary function. Data for analysis were retrieved from electronic medical records.

Results:

Ninety patients (52.9%) were female; the mean age was 64.0 ± 10.2 years. Multivariate logistic regression showed that a high erythrocyte sediment rate level at baseline [odds ratio (OR) = 3.056; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.183–7.890] and methotrexate (MTX) use (OR = 0.269; 95% CI = 0.094–0.769) were risk and protective factors for lung function decline, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age ⩾65 years (OR = 2.723; 95% CI = 1.142–6.491), radiologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or probable UIP (OR = 3.948; 95% CI = 1.522–10.242), baseline functional vital capacity (FVC) % predicted (OR = 0.971; 95% CI = 0.948–0.994), and MTX use (OR = 0.284; 95% CI = 0.091–0.880) were predictive of mortality.

Conclusion:

We identified risk and protective factors for lung function decline and mortality in patients with RA-ILD. MTX use was associated with favorable outcome in terms of both lung function and mortality in our cohort.

Immunomodulatory treatment of interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have an array of immunomodulatory treatment options compared with IPF, due to their inflammatory component. However, there is a relative paucity of guidance on the management of this heterogeneous group of diseases. In ILDs other than IPF, immunosuppression is the cornerstone of therapy, with varying levels of evidence for different immunomodulatory agents and for each specific ILD. Classification of ILDs is important for guiding treatment decisions. Immunomodulatory agents mainly include corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and rituximab. In this review, the available evidence for single agents in the most common ILDs is first discussed. We then reviewed practical therapeutic approaches in connective tissue disease-related ILD and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features, scleroderma-related ILD, vasculitis and dermatomyositis with hypoxemic respiratory failure, idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis sarcoidosis, fibrosing organizing pneumonia and eosinophilic pneumonia. The treatment of acute exacerbations of ILD is also discussed. Therapy augmentation in ILD is dictated by the recognition of progression of disease. Criteria for the evaluation of progression of disease are then discussed. Finally, specific protocol and measures to increase patients' safety are reviewed as well, including general monitoring and serologic surveillance, Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis, patients' education, genetic testing for azathioprine, MMF serum levels and cyclophosphamide administration protocols. Immunomodulatory therapies are largely successful in the management of ILDs and can be safely managed with the application of specific protocols, precautions and monitoring.

Advances with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, the primary focus of pharmaceutical research in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has been on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recently, pharmaceutical development has also focused on other forms of ILDs, including connective tissue diseases associated ILD, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis.

AREAS COVERED

The authors summarize the advances in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ILD. Specifically, the authors review the most recent studies and discuss the most recent research findings and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

Data collected over the past years have confirmed the efficacy of antifibrotic drugs on slowing disease progression in IPF. The usual strategy for CTD-ILD management is represented by the combined use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. There is an urgent need for new target therapies. The concept of progressive fibrosing ILD has emerged in the ILD community in recent years, which has led to grouping several diseases with a common disease behavior to find an effective treatment . At present, selecting the best therapy in ILDs should be reasonably performed on a case-by-case basis through a multidisciplinary team discussion in tertiary ILD centers, taking into consideration patients' symptoms, lung functional trends, and radiological changes.

Lunge – Interstitielle Lungenerkrankungen in der Rheumatologie

Interstitielle Lungenerkrankungen (ILD) gehören zu den häufigsten Organmanifestationen bei entzündlich-rheumatischen Systemerkrankungen. Sie können sich bei einer Vielzahl rheumatischer Erkrankungen manifestieren, insbesondere bei rheumatoider Arthritis, systemischer Sklerose und idiopathischen inflammatorischen Myopathien. ILD sind mit einer erhöhten Morbidität und Mortalität assoziiert. Eine sorgfältige Diagnostik unter Einbeziehung von Klinik, apparativer und Labordiagnostik ist zur Klassifikation und Risikostratifizierung der zugrundeliegenden Erkrankung und vorliegenden Lungenbeteiligung unabdingbar. Auch wenn weiterhin nicht alle ätiologischen und pathogenetischen Details bekannt sind, haben die letzten Jahre einige Fortschritte in Verständnis und Management der (CTD-) ILD ergeben.

Sustained Long-Term Retention Rates of Abatacept in Combination with Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background and Objectives: Treatment for elderly (aged ≥75 years) patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is important because they usually have several complications and organ dysfunction and are more susceptible to drug-related adverse events. Abatacept (ABT) treatment is relatively safe in elderly RA patients; however, the real-world data of efficacy and long-term retention of ABT is sparse in such patients. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and long-term retention rates of ABT in elderly Japanese RA patients. Materials and Methods: This 10-year retrospective observational cohort study was performed in two centers in Fukushima, Japan. We reviewed the clinical features of elderly RA patients who received ABT and investigated the differences in retention rates with concomitant administration of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Results: The clinical characteristics of younger (<75 years old, 39 cases) and elderly (≥75 years old, 20 cases) RA patients were generally similar. Although the efficacy was also similar, the concomitant administration of csDMARDs with ABT differed between the two groups. Younger patients significantly decreased methotrexate (MTX) administration than elderly patients (p < 0.01), and elderly patients significantly received tacrolimus (TAC) (p < 0.01) or salazosulfapyridine (SASP; p = 0.01) than younger patients. The overall retention and infection-free survival rates were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Elderly RA patients showed sustained retention rates compared to younger RA patients. TAC and SASP can help to maintain sustained retention rates in elderly RA patients.

A Closer Look at the Role of Anti-CCP Antibodies in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease and Bronchiectasis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an articular disease with extra-articular manifestations. Pulmonary manifestations are not uncommon and can involve all compartments of the lungs with airway disease in the form of bronchiectasis or bronchiolitis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), pleural effusions and parenchymal lung nodules. The pulmonary features may present synchronously or after the articular disease, but, importantly, it may be the first presentation in 10% of patients in the absence of articular symptoms. Here we discuss the pathogenesis of RA lung involvement, particularly interstitial lung disease and bronchiectasis, focusing on the role anti-CCP antibodies (ACPAs). We highlight the complex interplay among genetic, environmental and immune factors. Furthermore, we explore the relationship of citrullination and smoking as well as the concept of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), where patients do not have evidence of another known cause of interstitial pneumonia and have incomplete features of connective tissue disease (CTD). We surmise that the frequency and titers of rheumatoid factor (RF) and ACPAs are increased in bronchiectasis and RA-bronchiectasis compared to RA patients without lung disease. ACPA is associated with more severe disease in both RA-ILD and RA-bronchiectasis even in the absence of articular symptoms. There is no clear prediction of development of articular RA with high ACPA levels in the context of positive ACPA and ILD; however, in RA-bronchiectasis, patients with positive antibodies can develop RA within a year after diagnosis of bronchiectasis. Though the primary focus of this narrative is to highlight the role of ACPA in pathogenesis and clinical practice, we also discuss the current treatment options and trials in RA-ILD and RA-bronchiectasis. Currently, there are no clear treatment guidelines. The treatments are now focusing on using a combination of immunosuppression and antifibrotic agents. Combination treatment targets both the fibrotic and inflammatory components of the disease process. Further studies are needed to identify the use of ACPA as a biomarker to tailor the treatment in RA-ILD and RA-bronchiectasis.

Decision-Making Strategy for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common type of autoimmune arthritis. Patient clinical outcomes might be influenced by numerous respiratory diseases, but interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most important comorbidity. RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) is divided into acute/subacute and chronic forms. In the acute/subacute course, if the disease is severe as indicated by a diffuse alveolar damage pattern, high-dose corticosteroids combined with antimicrobial agents should be promptly initiated while considering the differential diagnoses, primarily acute exacerbation (AE) of RA-ILD, drug-induced pneumonitis, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. As initial therapeutic management in the chronic course, the RA itself should be stabilized without delay; thereafter, the activity of ILD itself can be stabilized, considering the safety of each anti-rheumatic drug. The formation of the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern is the most important determinant because lung function can worsen more quickly with this pattern. However, because clinicians can fail to identify specific radiological patterns, it is important to determine whether each patient with RA-ILD has UIP-like lesions such as subpleural reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, and honeycombing especially progressively enlarged cysts. In patients with progressive RA-ILD and high risk for infection or AE of ILD in whom fibrosis is dominant, clinicians should consider starting an anti-fibrotic agent.

The Extent and Diverse Trajectories of Longitudinal Changes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Interstitial Lung Diseases Using Quantitative HRCT Scores

We aimed to validate quantitative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging analyses of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and to delineate a broad spectrum of annual longitudinal changes of ILD severity in the RA-ILD cohorts. Retrospective cohort 1 (n = 26) had matched PFT results and prospective cohort 2 (n = 34) were followed for over two years with baseline serum specimen. Automated quantitative analysis of HRCT was expressed as the extent of ground-glass opacity, lung fibrosis, honeycombing, and their summation-the total extent of quantitative ILD (QILD). Higher QILD score was associated with lower pulmonary function especially for DLCO% (ρ = -0.433, p = 0.027). Higher serum level of Krebs von den Lungen 6 were significantly associated with high QILD scores (ρ = 0.400, p = 0.026). Regarding QILD score changes in whole lung, even a single point increase was significantly associated with interval progression detected by the radiologist. Four distinct patterns (improvement, worsening, convex-like, and concave-like) during the 24 months were described by QILD scores. Prolonged disease duration of ILD at baseline was significantly associated with worsening of QILD scores. QILD has the potential to reliably evaluate the dynamic severity changes in patients with RA-ILD.

The role of lung ultrasound B-lines and serum KL-6 in the screening and follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis patients for an identification of interstitial lung disease: review of the literature, proposal for a preliminary algorithm, and clinical application to cases

Screening and follow-up of interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) is a challenge in clinical practice. In fact, the majority of RA-ILD patients are asymptomatic and optimal tools for early screening and regular follow-up are lacking. Furthermore, some patients may remain oligosymptomatic despite significant radiological abnormalities. In RA-ILD, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the most frequent radiological and pathological pattern, associated with a poor prognosis and a high risk to develop acute exacerbations and infections. If RA-ILD can be identified early, there may be an opportunity for an early treatment and close follow-up that might delay ILD progression and improve the long-term outcome.In connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), lung ultrasound (LUS) with the assessment of B-lines and serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 antigen (KL-6) has been recognized as sensitive biomarkers for the early detection of ILD. B-line number and serum KL-6 level were found to correlate with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and other clinical parameters in systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD). Recently, the significant correlation between B-lines and KL-6, two non-ionizing and non-invasive biomarkers, was demonstrated. Hence, the combined use of LUS and KL-6 to screen and follow up ILD in RA patients might be useful in clinical practice in addition to existing tools. Herein, we review relevant literature to support this concept, propose a preliminary screening algorithm, and present 2 cases where the algorithm was used.

Prevalence, incidence and cause-specific mortality of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease among older rheumatoid arthritis patients

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the prevalence, incidence and cause-specific mortality of RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) among older US patients with RA.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide cohort study using Medicare claims data (parts A, B and D for 2008-2017). RA was identified with a validated algorithm using RA diagnosis codes and DMARD prescription. RA-ILD was identified with a validated algorithm using ILD diagnosis codes by a rheumatologist/pulmonologist. RA-ILD was categorized as prevalent or incident relative to the initial RA observation (baseline/index date). We compared the total mortality of RA-ILD to RA without ILD using multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for baseline covariates. For cause-specific mortality, Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (sdHRs) were estimated to handle competing risks of alternative mortality causes.

RESULTS

Among 509 787 RA patients (mean age 72.6 years, 76.2% female), 10 306 (2.0%) had prevalent RA-ILD at baseline. After baseline, 13 372 (2.6%) developed RA-ILD during 1 873 127 person-years of follow-up (median 3.0 years/person). During follow-up, 38.7% of RA-ILD patients died compared with 20.7% of RA patients without ILD. After multivariable adjustment, RA-ILD had an HR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.60, 1.72) for total mortality. Accounting for competing risk of other causes of death, RA-ILD had an sdHR of 4.39 (95% CI 4.13, 4.67) for respiratory mortality and an sdHR of 1.56 (95% CI 1.43, 1.71) for cancer mortality compared with RA without ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

RA-ILD was present or developed in nearly 5% of patients in this nationwide study of older patients with RA. Compared with RA without ILD, RA-ILD was associated with excess total, respiratory and cancer mortality that was not explained by measured factors.

The Attitudes and Practices of Physicians Caring for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis-Interstitial Lung Disease: An International Survey

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the level of understanding and opinion amongst rheumatologist and pulmonologists regarding risk factors, diagnostic approach and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

METHODS

We conducted an international electronic survey of rheumatologists and pulmonologists utilizing two separate Redcap-based surveys with questions on the epidemiology, workup and management of RA-ILD as well as ILD screening questions using case-based scenarios directed at rheumatologists. The survey also collected demographic data on participants including their practice setting, years in practice and country of practice.

RESULTS

We received a total of 616 responses (354 rheumatologists and 262 pulmonologists) from 6 continents. There were significant differences in responses between pulmonologists and rheumatologists in estimated prevalence and mortality, risk factors for the development of ILD in RA and medications that are effective or should be avoided. Rheumatologists were much less likely to consider assessment for ILD in high risk, asymptomatic patients compared with high-risk patients with either symptoms or exam findings suggestive of ILD.

CONCLUSION

Our study brought to light the variability in disease assessment and clinical practice amongst providers caring for patients with RA-ILD and indicate that greater education is needed to optimize clinical decision making in the risk assessment, screening and treatment of RA-ILD. Research questions that address appropriate screening and treatment strategies for RA-ILD will be valuable for rheumatologists given their central role in the overall health and lung health of patients with RA.

An update on interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung diseases are a complex group of conditions that cause inflammation and scarring of the lung interstitium. This article discusses the diagnosis and management of common interstitial lung diseases including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, connective tissue disease associated-interstitial lung disease, sarcoidosis and drug-induced interstitial lung disease. A multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis of interstitial lung disease is the gold standard; key history and examination features, blood panel, pulmonary function tests, high resolution computed tomography imaging, and when required bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy results are discussed to reach a multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis. Advances, including the development of the disease-modifying anti-fibrotic medications nintedanib and pirfenidone, continue to shape the future management of interstitial lung disease. A holistic approach to the care of patients with interstitial lung disease is paramount, as they often have a high symptom burden and considerable palliative care needs.

Biomarkers for interstitial lung disease and acute-onset diffuse interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently a complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as an extra-articular manifestation which has a poor prognosis. Acute-onset diffuse ILD (AoDILD) occasionally occurs in RA and includes acute exacerbation of ILD, drug-induced ILD, and Pneumocystis pneumonia. AoDILD also confers a poor prognosis in RA. Previously-established biomarkers for ILD include Krebs von den lungen-6 and surfactant protein-D originally defined in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; the sensitivity of these markers for RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) is low. Although many studies on ILD markers have been performed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, only a few validation studies in RA-ILD or AoDILD have been reported. Biomarkers for RA-ILD and AoDILD are thus still required. Recently, genomic, cytokine, antibody, and metabolomic profiles of RA-ILD or AoDILD have been investigated with the aim of improving biomarkers. In this review, we summarize current preliminary data on these potential biomarkers for RA-ILD or AoDILD. The development of biomarkers on RA-ILD has only just begun. When validated, such candidate biomarkers will provide valuable information on pathogenesis, prognosis, and drug responses in RA-ILD in future.

[Lung involvement in rheumatic diseases]

Lung involvement is one of the most frequent organ manifestation in rheumatic diseases (CTD-ILD). Especially patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are affected. Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The last years have brought advances in management and treatment of ILDs. Methotrexate is probably not a significant cause of lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis but might even delay the presentation of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Tocilizumab could be a treatment option in SSc-ILD, despite the limitations of the current studies. For Systemic Sclerosis-ILD (SSc-ILD) and progressive fibrosing ILD, antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib is now approved.

Current advances in the treatment of autoimmune-associated interstitial lung diseases

Autoimmune-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a widespread and clinically significant form of autoimmune diseases. ILD can be present in most type of autoimmune diseases. Scleroderma, Sjogren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory myositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and mixed connective tissue disease are all examples of autoimmune disorders that can cause ILD. Treatment and prognosis vary from that of other forms of ILD depending on the etiology and pathogenesis of the autoimmune disease. As a result, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents are the mainstays of treatment for autoimmune-associated ILD, despite the fact that there is little high-level evidence to guide the treatment owing to limited data from randomized controlled trials. Immunosuppressive agents including cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil can be used to reduce the dose of glucocorticoids and the inflammatory cascade and inhibit various pro-inflammatory cytokines. Studies have also started alternative therapeutic approaches, such as biological and antifibrotic agents, and traditional immunosuppressive agents. In this review, we summarize available treatment options and recent advances in therapeutic strategies for patients with autoimmune-associated ILD.

Progression in the Management of Non-Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Interstitial Lung Diseases, Where Are We Now and Where We Would Like to Be

A significant proportion of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by worsening of symptoms and pulmonary function, progressive fibrosis on chest computed tomography and increased mortality. The clinical course in these patients mimics the relentless progressiveness of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Common pathophysiological mechanisms such as a shared genetic susceptibility and a common downstream pathway—self-sustaining fibroproliferation—support the concept of a progressive fibrosing phenotype, which is applicable to a broad range of non-IPF ILDs. While antifibrotic drugs became the standard of care in IPF, immunosuppressive agents are still the mainstay of treatment in non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD). However, recently, randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic treatment in systemic sclerosis-associated F-ILD and a broad range of F-ILDs with a progressive phenotype. This review summarizes the current pharmacological management and highlights the unmet needs in patients with non-IPF ILD.

Does methotrexate cause progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease? A systematic review

The aim is to evaluate the published evidence on whether methotrexate (MTX) use causes progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD). This PRISMA-compliant systematic review has been registered electronically with PROSPERO 2018 ID CRD42018087838, Centre of review and dissemination at the University of York. A total of 29 articles met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen articles were found to support the claim that MTX causes fILD. They all had a low Downs and Black quality score (< 6/27). Their ‘risk of bias’ assessment scores indicated serious to critical risk of bias. The 16 articles rejecting the claim that MTX causes fILD were of higher quality as indicated by their Downs and Black score. Their ‘risk of bias’ assessment scores suggested only a low to moderate risk of bias. This systematic literature review supports the finding that MTX does not cause fILD in humans. Three studies suggest that MTX treatment may actually improve outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associated fILD by slowing down ILD progression.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex syndrome caused by the inhalation of a variety of antigens in susceptible and sensitized individuals. These antigens are found in the environment, mostly derived from bird proteins and fungi. The prevalence and incidence of HP vary widely depending on the intensity of exposure, the geographical area and the local climate. Immunopathologically, HP is characterized by an exaggerated humoral and cellular immune response affecting the small airways and lung parenchyma. A complex interplay of genetic, host and environmental factors underlies the development and progression of HP. HP can be classified into acute, chronic non-fibrotic and chronic fibrotic forms. Acute HP results from intermittent, high-level exposure to the inducing antigen, usually within a few hours of exposure, whereas chronic HP mostly originates from long-term, low-level exposure (usually to birds or moulds in the home), is not easy to define in terms of time, and may occur within weeks, months or even years of exposure. Some patients with fibrotic HP may evolve to a progressive phenotype, even with complete exposure avoidance. Diagnosis is based on an accurate exposure history, clinical presentation, characteristic high-resolution CT findings, specific IgG antibodies to the offending antigen, bronchoalveolar lavage and pathological features. Complete antigen avoidance is the mainstay of treatment. The pharmacotherapy of chronic HP consists of immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, with antifibrotic therapy being a potential therapy for patients with progressive disease.