The role of palliative care in the last month of life in elderly cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

One major health care issue encountered in elderly cancer patients is the alteration of the quality of life. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the administration of chemotherapy in the last month of life (CLML) and to evaluate the impact of the palliative care consult (PCC) in the elderly patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study that included elderly patients diagnosed with an end-stage cancer and who were deceased between the 1st of January 2012 and the 31st of December 2015. Patient medical records were reviewed for patients' characteristics and management during the last month of life.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 231 patients that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. CLML was administered in 91 patients (39.4 %) among which 43 patients (47.3 %) had their treatment within the last 2 weeks of life. Seventy-seven patients (33.3 %) had a palliative care consult (PCC) with a median duration of follow up of 13 days (range 2-56 days). Overall, PCC failed to decrease CLML administration, the duration of hospitalization, and ICU admissions. However, CLML administration decreased by 69 % among patients that had their PCC before receiving treatment (OR = 0.31; 95 % CI 0.15-0.63). PCC also led to a change in the pattern of treatment administered in the last month of life with less cytotoxic therapy (OR = 0.27 CI 95 % 0.09-0.9, p = 0.02) and higher rates of oral agents being prescribed (OR = 3.8; 95 % CI 1.3-11.3, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Our elderly patients seem to receive aggressive management similar to the general oncology population. Early PCC was shown throughout our results to decrease the aggressiveness of cancer treatment in elderly patients which seems to improve the quality of care of our patients.

Quality of life and functional status of terminally ill head and neck cancer patients: a nation-wide, prospective observational study at tertiary cancer centers in Japan

BACKGROUND

Little is known about quality of life and functional status of patients with terminally ill head and neck cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study to examine quality of life and functional status in terminally ill head and neck cancer patients.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 72 were observed until death. There was no significant difference in the quality of life score between baseline and Week 3. Forty patients (54.9%) could speak and 22 patients (30.5%) could have oral intake upon study entry. Fifty-three patients (74.6%) received enteral nutrition. Twenty-six patients (36.6%) required dressing changes for fungating tumors. The route of nutritional intake (nasogastric tube vs. percutaneous gastric tube) might be predictive for the duration of hospital stay (64 vs. 21 days, P = 0.0372).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant relationship between quality of life and functional status seen in this study. Feeding tube type could have the most impact on quality of life.

Effect of Primary Care Involvement on End-of-Life Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between primary care involvement in end-of-life (EOL) care and health and utilization outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review using MEDLINE and Web of Science.

SETTING

All English literature published between 1994 and August 31, 2014, that included terms related to primary care providers (PCPs), continuity of care, EOL care, and palliative care.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals receiving care from a PCP at the end of life.

MEASUREMENTS

Study design, subject characteristics, study outcomes and results.

RESULTS

Of 2,812 studies screened, 13 were included in this study. The studies were mostly conducted in the United States (n = 5) and Canada (n = 4) and analyzed data collected from 1989 to 2010. Almost all studies used different definitions of PCP involvement in care, but in general, individuals who received more care from PCPs were more likely to be discharged or die with supportive care (home or hospice) than those receiving less PCP care. A few studies indicated that individuals seeing a PCP were less likely to have hospital or emergency department admissions, although the evidence for this was mixed. Studies linking PCP involvement to resource use, symptom management, and survival had mixed results or showed no association.

CONCLUSION

When PCPs are involved in EOL care, people are more likely to die out of the hospital. Thus, the relationship with the PCP may be particularly important in EOL care, because PCPs may help individual establish goals of care and determine treatment preferences.

Association Between Bereaved Families' Sense of Security and Their Experience of Death in Cancer Patients: Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study

CONTEXT

The sense of security scale was developed to indicate care quality within the community. Bereaved families have perspective to evaluate the quality of the care system.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to examine associations between end-of-life care and sense of security regarding regional cancer care among bereaved families.

METHODS

A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted with families of cancer patients who died in regional areas of Japan.

RESULTS

A total of 1046 family caregivers of patients responded to surveys (effective response rate of 65%). In multiple regression analyses, the families' higher age (P < 0.001), home death (P = 0.039), better health status of the family at patients' end of life (P = 0.016), lower caregiving burden (P < 0.001), and elements of perceived good patient death, including being free from physical distress (P < 0.001), trusting the physician (P < 0.001), living in calm circumstances (P = 0.042), and feeling that one's life was fulfilling (P = 0.035), were associated with a higher sense of security.

CONCLUSION

Quality of death and lower burden on family caregivers were associated with families' sense of security. This suggests strategies for improving care quality for each patient to improve the sense of security.

Population-Based Quality Indicators for Palliative Care Programs for Cancer Patients in Japan: A Delphi Study

CONTEXT

Cancer control programs in Japan strongly endorse the dissemination of palliative care, and various policy measures have been implemented; however, indicators for evaluating palliative care programs have not been defined.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop quality indicators for palliative care programs taking a population-based view to meet the challenge of cancer control in the Japanese population.

METHODS

We conducted a modified Delphi survey. The panelists rated a list of indicators over three iterative rounds according to four perspectives: 1) consistency with the policy target, 2) relevance to the problem, 3) clarity of expression, and 4) measurement feasibility. The criterion for adoption of candidate indicators was set at a total mean score of 7 or more. Finally, the most relevant and important indicators were selected; consensus was defined by agreement of panelists at the panel meeting.

RESULTS

Among 49 panelists surveyed, 48 (98%), 39 (80%), and 43 (88%) responded over the three rounds, respectively. The 15 indicators were identified from 11 domains: patient-reported quality of life, bereaved family-reported quality at the end of life, family care, place of death, bereaved family-reported quality of palliative care, specialized palliative care services, opioid utilization, public perceptions about palliative care, palliative care education to primary care providers, specialist palliative care services, and regional palliative care.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive quality indicators for palliative care programs were identified. The indicators are currently being used, and the feasibility of measuring change over time will be examined. It is expected that the indicators will be used effectively in the future. It is important to evaluate outcomes of the program, to improve weaknesses, improve outcomes, and promote the welfare of cancer patients.

A National Survey to Systematically Identify Factors Associated With Oncologists' Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Discussions: What Determines Timing of End-of-Life Discussions?

BACKGROUND

End-of-life discussions (EOLds) occur infrequently until cancer patients become terminally ill.

METHODS

To identify factors associated with the timing of EOLds, we conducted a nationwide survey of 864 medical oncologists. We surveyed the timing of EOLds held with advanced cancer patients regarding prognosis, hospice, site of death, and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status; and we surveyed physicians' experience of EOLds, perceptions of a good death, and beliefs regarding these issues. Multivariate analyses identified determinants of early discussions.

RESULTS

Among 490 physicians (response rate: 57%), 165 (34%), 65 (14%), 47 (9.8%), and 20 (4.2%) would discuss prognosis, hospice, site of death, and DNR status, respectively, "now" (i.e., at diagnosis) with a hypothetical patient with newly diagnosed metastatic cancer. In multivariate analyses, determinants of discussing prognosis "now" included the physician perceiving greater importance of autonomy in experiencing a good death (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34; p = .014), less perceived difficulty estimating the prognosis (OR: 0.77; p = .012), and being a hematologist (OR: 1.68; p = .016). Determinants of discussing hospice "now" included the physician perceiving greater importance of life completion in experiencing a good death (OR: 1.58; p = .018), less discomfort talking about death (OR: 0.67; p = .002), and no responsibility as treating physician at end of life (OR: 1.94; p = .031). Determinants of discussing site of death "now" included the physician perceiving greater importance of life completion in experiencing a good death (OR: 1.83; p = .008) and less discomfort talking about death (OR: 0.74; p = .034). The determinant of discussing DNR status "now" was less discomfort talking about death (OR: 0.49; p = .003).

CONCLUSION

Reflection by oncologists on their own values regarding a good death, knowledge about validated prognostic measures, and learning skills to manage discomfort talking about death is helpful for oncologists to perform appropriate EOLds.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Oncologists' own perceptions about what is important for a "good death," perceived difficulty in estimating the prognosis, and discomfort in talking about death influence their attitudes toward end-of-life discussions. Reflection on their own values regarding a good death, knowledge about validated prognostic measures, and learning skills to manage discomfort talking about death are important for improving oncologists' skills in facilitating end-of-life discussions.

Factors Predicting Bereaved Caregiver Perception of Quality of Care in the Final Week of Life: Implications for Health Care Providers

BACKGROUND

Cancer caregivers are key stakeholders in the final weeks of life and in bereavement. Research has highlighted end-of-life (EOL) factors important to caregivers, as well as factors contributing to caregiver mental health and bereavement outcomes. There has been limited data on factors predicting caregiver perceptions of quality of EOL care.

OBJECTIVE

This study's purpose was to identify modifiable predictors of caregivers' Caregiver Evaluation of Quality of End of Life Care (CEQUEL) scores, with the broader aim of informing clinical interventions to improve caregiver impressions of care and subsequent bereavement adjustment.

METHODS

Study data came from Coping with Cancer I (CwC1). CwC1 investigators interviewed advanced cancer patients and caregivers prior to the patient's death (Wave 1) and reinterviewed caregivers following the death (Wave 2) (N=275 dyads). The authors identified potential Wave 1 predictors of CEQUEL scores and performed a series of linear regression analyses to identify a parsimonious predictive model using corrected Akaike's Information Criterion (AICc) values.

RESULTS

In adjusted analyses, caregivers rated quality of care as poorer when patients died in a hospital (B=-1.40, SE=0.40, p=0.001) (B, unstandardized regression coefficient; SE, standard error) or had less than one week of inpatient hospice care (B=-1.98, SE=-0.70, p=0.006). Whole-person physician care and caregiver religiosity were associated with perceived higher quality of care in unadjusted, but not adjusted, analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that place of death and hospice length of stay best predict bereaved caregiver evaluations of quality of EOL care. These findings equip health care providers with modifiable targets to improve caregivers' experience of EOL care and subsequent bereavement.

Patient Preferences versus Family Physicians' Perceptions Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Care and Death: A Nationwide Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Enabling people to die in their preferred place is important for providing high-quality end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to explore patients' preferences regarding the place of end-of-life care and death and to compare these preferences with the perceptions of their family physicians.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used stratified random sampling, surveying 400 registered patients and 200 of their family physicians nationwide, with a five-part, structured, self-report questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the selected population, 310 patients (response rate 77.5%) and 169 physicians (response rate 84.5%) responded. Regarding the preferred place for end-of-life care, most of the patients would choose to receive care at home (60.6%) if home care services were available. Additionally, home was the most frequently preferred (66.5%) place of death. The family physicians' survey showed that a higher proportion of physicians selected home as the preferred place for end-of-life care and death (71.6% and 87.2%, respectively). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that patients younger than 50 years of age who believed in Chinese folk religion and who resided in a rural area were more likely to prefer to die at home.

CONCLUSIONS

The most commonly preferred place for end-of-life care and death is the patient's home. Establishing a community-based palliative care system should be encouraged to allow more individuals to die in their preferred locations. There were discrepancies in the preferred place of end-of-life care and death between the patients' preferences and their family physicians' perceptions. More effective physician-patient communication regarding end-of-life care is needed.