Infliximab for the treatment of CNS sarcoidosis: A multi-institutional series

Biologic Therapies in Sarcoidosis and Uveitis: A Review

Sarcoidosis and uveitis are chronic inflammatory conditions with potentially debilitating effects on quality of life. Steroids form the mainstay standard therapy in both conditions. Biologic agents are considered to be appropriate alternatives for treatment in steroid-refractory sarcoidosis and uveitis due to the role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in mediating the inflammatory cascade seen in both conditions. We performed a thorough literature search using PubMed to compare the extent of use, efficacy, and safety profile of individual anti-TNF agents in the management of these conditions. Our review consists of two systematic reviews with meta-analysis, thirteen observational studies, and fifteen case series/reports. Infliximab had the widest range of organ-system usage in extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis but is equivalent to adalimumab in terms of efficacy. In uveitis, adalimumab was found to be the most efficacious agent for maintaining disease remission in adults and children with chronic non-infectious uveitis. Etanercept was neither used widely, nor was it efficacious in the management of either condition. In terms of safety profile, biologic agents were found to be well tolerated and have a similar safety profile. More randomized clinical trials are needed to inform evidence-based use of biologic agents in these conditions.

Sarcoidosis and the Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview and update on the neurologic manifestations of sarcoidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 Neurosarcoidosis Consortium diagnostic criteria emphasize that biopsy is key for diagnosis and determines the level of diagnostic certainty. Thus, definite neurosarcoidosis requires nervous system biopsy and probable neurosarcoidosis requires biopsy from extraneural tissue. Without biopsy, possible neurosarcoidosis can be diagnosed if the clinical, imaging, and laboratory picture is compatible and other causes are ruled out. Recent large retrospective studies from the United States and France established that infliximab appears to be efficacious when other treatments are inadequate.

SUMMARY

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem noninfectious granulomatous disorder that is immune mediated, reflecting the response to an as-yet unidentified antigen or antigens. Neurosarcoidosis refers to neurologic involvement due to sarcoidosis that clinically manifests in 5% of cases of sarcoidosis, with asymptomatic involvement in as many as another one in five patients with sarcoidosis. Sarcoid granulomas can occur in any anatomic substrate in the nervous system, causing protean manifestations that have earned neurosarcoidosis the sobriquet the great mimic. Nevertheless, central nervous system sarcoidosis occurs in well-defined presentations that can be classified as cranial neuropathies, meningeal disease, brain parenchymal (including pituitary-hypothalamic) disease, and spinal cord disease. In addition, the peripheral nervous system is affected in the form of peripheral neuropathy and myopathy. Glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of treatment, especially in the acute stage, whereas steroid-sparing agents such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine are used for prolonged therapy to minimize steroid toxicity. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents may help in refractory cases.

Neurosarcoidosis: clinical manifestations, investigation and treatment

Sarcoidosis affects the nervous system in 10% of cases. When it does so it can affect any part of the nervous system and with all degrees of severity. It forms part of the differential diagnosis in inflammatory, infective, neoplastic and degenerative neurological diseases and may be very difficult to diagnose without histological confirmation. Recent clinical studies and the increasing availability of new biological treatments allow a much clearer understanding of the disease. This review summarises its clinical features, imaging and laboratory characteristics, treatment and outcome.

Neurosarcoidosis: Longitudinal experience in a single-center, academic healthcare system

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients with neurosarcoidosis within the University of Utah healthcare system, including demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients with neurosarcoidosis within the University of Utah healthcare system (a large referral center for 10% of the continental United States by land mass). Patients were selected who met the following criteria: (1) at least one International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification, 9th revision code 135 or International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification, 10th revision code D86* (sarcoidosis) and (2) at least one outpatient visit with a University of Utah clinician in the Neurology Department within the University of Utah electronic health record.

RESULTS

We identified 56 patients meeting the study criteria. Thirty-five patients (63%) were women, and most patients (84%) were white. Twelve patients (22%) met the criteria for definite neurosarcoidosis, 36 patients (64%) were diagnosed with probable neurosarcoidosis, and 8 patients (14%) were diagnosed with possible neurosarcoidosis. A total of 8 medications were used for the treatment of neurosarcoidosis. Prednisone was the first-line treatment in 51 patients (91%). Infliximab was the most effective therapy, with 87% of patients remaining stable or improving on infliximab. Treatment response for methotrexate and azathioprine was mixed, and mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab were the least effective treatments in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a comprehensive characterization of neurosarcoidosis within a single healthcare system at the University of Utah that reports long-term response to treatment and outcomes of patients with neurosarcoidosis. Our results suggest the use of infliximab as a first-line therapy for neurosarcoidosis.

Management of rheumatic complications of ICI therapy: a rheumatology viewpoint

Since immune checkpoint inhibitors became the standard of care for an increasing number of indications, more patients have been exposed to these drugs and physicians are more challenged with the management of a unique spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Those irAEs of autoimmune or autoinflammatory origin, or both, can involve any organ or tissue, but most commonly affect the dermatological, gastrointestinal and endocrine systems. Rheumatic/systemic irAEs seem to be less frequent (although underreporting in clinical trials is probable), but information on their management is highly relevant given that they can persist longer than other irAEs. Their management consists of anti-inflammatory treatment including glucocorticoids, synthetic and biologic immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive drugs, symptomatic therapies as well as holding or, rarely, discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we summarize the management of rheumatic/systemic irAEs based on data from clinical trials but mainly from published case reports and series, contextualize them and propose perspectives for their treatment.

Viscous Leptomeningeal Pseudotumoural Masses and Multiple Cranial Neuropathy - Severe Presentation of Neurosarcoidosis

We present a case of a 56-year-old man with a history of episcleritis (left) and cluster headache (left) who had a penetrating trauma of the left eye leading to amaurosis 1 month previously. Since then, he developed multiple cranial neuropathy of the right side (V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI and XII cranial pairs). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an infiltrative lesion of the base of the skull which extended to the retropharyngeal and jugular space, which progressed to multiple leptomeningeal masses extending to the clivus, despite aggressive immunosuppression. Rebiopsy of 1 meningeal mass supported the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. The patient finally responded to high-dose prolonged infliximab therapy, with complete remission.

Delphi consensus recommendations for a treatment algorithm in pulmonary sarcoidosis

Pulmonary sarcoidosis presents substantial management challenges, with limited evidence on effective therapies and phenotypes. In the absence of definitive evidence, expert consensus can supply clinically useful guidance in medicine. An international panel of 26 experts participated in a Delphi process to identify consensus on pharmacological management in sarcoidosis with the development of preliminary recommendations.

The modified Delphi process used three rounds. The first round focused on qualitative data collection with open-ended questions to ensure comprehensive inclusion of expert concepts. Rounds 2 and 3 applied quantitative assessments using an 11-point Likert scale to identify consensus.

Key consensus points included glucocorticoids as initial therapy for most patients, with non-biologics (immunomodulators), usually methotrexate, considered in severe or extrapulmonary disease requiring prolonged treatment, or as a steroid-sparing intervention in cases with high risk of steroid toxicity. Biologic therapies might be considered as additive therapy if non-biologics are insufficiently effective or are not tolerated with initial biologic therapy, usually with a tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor, typically infliximab.

The Delphi methodology provided a platform to gain potentially valuable insight and interim guidance while awaiting evidenced-based contributions.

Expert consensus recommendations for a pulmonary sarcoidosis treatment algorithm from a modified Delphi process include corticosteroids as initial therapy, immunomodulators for steroid-sparing or severe disease, and biologics for very severe diseasehttp://bit.ly/2SmP3uG

Knowing when to use steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics for the treatment of sarcoidosis

Introduction: Care of patients with sarcoidosis requires familiarity with its natural history as well as of various immunosuppressants employed in its treatment. We would like to share our approach to management based on our experience and understanding of the relevant literature.Areas covered: Asymptomatic patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis ought to be managed conservatively. Systemic sarcoidosis with burdensome symptoms usually responds to corticosteroids, but one needs to consider the risk of long-term steroid toxicity as well as relapse. Rapidly tapering steroids can decrease cumulative exposure without compromising efficacy. Steroid-sparing anti-sarcoidosis (SSAS) agents take longer to act and are associated with unique but mostly reversible toxicities. Used judiciously and with careful monitoring, they effectively suppress granulomatous inflammation. Patients intolerant of or failing to improve with a particular drug can be switched to another, and occasionally combination therapy with two SSAS agents might prove effective. A small proportion of patients are refractory, but often achieve control and sometimes remission with stepping up to biologic therapy.Expert opinion: Adopting a strategy of early SSAS therapy ought to effectively control sarcoidosis and avoid harm from prolonged corticosteroid dosing.

TNF-alpha inhibition for the treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are increasingly being used for treating refractory cardiac sarcoidosis. There is a theoretical risk, however, that these therapies can worsen heart failure, and reports on efficacy and safety are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all cardiac sarcoidosis patients seen at Stanford University from 2009 to 2018. Data were collected on patient demographics, diagnostic testing, and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 77 cardiac sarcoidosis patients, of which 20 (26%) received TNF-α inhibitor treatment. The majority were treated for progressive heart failure or tachyarrhythmia, along with worsening imaging findings. All TNF-α inhibitor treated patients demonstrated meaningful benefit, as assessed by changes in advanced imaging, echocardiographic measures of cardiac function, and prednisone use.

CONCLUSIONS

A large cohort (n = 77) of cardiac sarcoidosis patients has been treated at Stanford University. Roughly one-fourth of these patients (n = 20) received TNF-α inhibitors. Of these patients, none had worsening heart failure and all saw clinical benefit. These results help support the use of TNF-α inhibitors for the treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis based on real-world evidence and highlight the need for future prospective studies.

Advanced sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advanced sarcoidosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in sarcoidosis. Over the past few years, several studies have been published clarifying the prevalence and severity of this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pulmonary involvement is the most common form of sarcoidosis. Increased morbidity and significant mortality is encountered in advanced lung disease. Although many sarcoidosis patients with pulmonary fibrosis have a normal life expectancy, at least 20% develop progression and may die from this complication. Sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH) is an independent cause of death in advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis. Two large multicenter registries and a large single-center report provide more details regarding presentation and outcome of SAPH. Advanced neurologic disease is associated with significant morbidity, but not much mortality. Two large retrospective reviews demonstrated the effectiveness of infliximab in treating advanced neurosarcoidosis. Advanced cardiac sarcoidosis can lead to mortality.

SUMMARY

Advanced sarcoidosis is associated with significant morbidity and some mortality. Up to a quarter of all sarcoidosis patients have one or more forms of advanced disease. These patients require closer monitoring and often multiples treatments.

Very Unusual Sellar/Suprasellar Region Masses: A Review

The cause of sellar region masses in large retrospective series is overwhelmingly pituitary adenomas (84.6%), followed by craniopharyngiomas (3.2%), cystic nonneoplastic lesions (2.8%), inflammatory lesions (1.1%), meningiomas (0.94%), metastases (0.6%), and chordomas (0.5%) (1). While other rare lesions were also identified (collectively 6.0%), single unusual entities in the above-cited series numbered <1-2 examples each out of the 4122 cases, underscoring their rarity. We searched our joint files for rare, often singular, sellar/suprasellar masses that we had encountered over the past several decades in our own specialty, tertiary care specialty pituitary center practices. Cases for this review were subjectively selected for their challenging clinical and/or histological features as well as teaching value based on the senior authors' (MBSL, BKD) collective experience with over 7000 examples. We excluded entities deemed to be already well-appreciated by neuropathologists such as mixed adenoma-gangliocytoma, posterior pituitary tumors, metastases, and hypophysitis. We identified examples that, in our judgment, were sufficiently unusual enough to warrant further reporting. Herein, we present 3 diffuse large cell B cell pituitary lymphomas confined to the sellar region with first presentation at that site, 2 sarcomas primary to sella in nonirradiated patients, and 1 case each of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and neurosarcoidosis with first presentations as a sellar/suprasellar mass. Other cases included 1 of chronic lymphocytic leukemia within a gonadotroph adenoma and 1 of ectopic nerve fascicles embedded within a somatotroph adenoma, neither of which impacted patient care. Our objective was to share these examples and review the relevant literature.

The cerebrospinal fluid CD4/CD8 ratio and interleukin-6 and -10 levels in neurosarcoidosis: a multicenter, pragmatic, comparative study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neurosarcoidosis is a rare inflammatory disorder of unknown cause. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of T/B lymphocyte population counts and the concentrations of the cytokines interleukin (IL) 6 and IL-10 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of neurosarcoidosis patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study CSF biomarkers was conducted in patients with neurosarcoidosis who underwent CSF analysis between 2012 and 2017 as well as various control populations.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with neurosarcoidosis, 14 with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 48 with other inflammatory disorders were analyzed. The CSF IL-6 levels were higher in sarcoidosis patients than in MS patients (median 8 vs. 3 pg/ml, P = 0.006). The CSF CD4/CD8 ratio was higher in sarcoidosis patients than in MS patients and in patients with other inflammatory disorders (median 3.18 vs. 2.36 and 2.10, respectively, P = 0.008). The CSF IL-6 level was higher in patients with active neurosarcoidosis than in non-active neurosarcoidosis patients (median 13 vs. 3 pg/ml, P = 0.0005). In patients with neurosarcoidosis, a CSF IL-6 concentration >50 pg/ml was associated with a higher risk of relapse or progression-free survival (hazard ratio 3.60; 95% confidence interval 1.78-23.14). A refractory neurosarcoidosis patient was treated with an anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody that produced a complete neurological response.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSF CD4/CD8 ratio and IL-6 concentration are increased in neurosarcoidosis compared to MS and other inflammatory disorders. A CSF IL-6 concentration >50 pg/ml is associated with relapse or progression of neurosarcoidosis. IL-10 levels may be elevated in neurosarcoidosis.

Management of neurosarcoidosis: a clinical challenge

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sarcoidosis is a complex disease with many faces, and the clinical manifestation and course of neurosarcoidosis are particularly variable. Although neurosarcoidosis occurs in up to 10% of sarcoidosis patients, it can lead to significant morbidity and some mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three criteria are usually required for a diagnosis of (neuro)sarcoidosis: clinical and radiologic manifestations, noncaseating granulomas, and no evidence of alternative disease. Recent guidelines have helped to clarify criteria for diagnosing neurosarcoidosis. No firm guidelines exist on whether, when, and how treatment should be started. Treatment depends on the presentation and distribution, extensiveness, and severity of neurosarcoidosis. As regards evidence-based treatment, only a few randomized controlled trials have been done. Hence, several aspects of (neuro)sarcoidosis management are not fully addressed by the current literature.

SUMMARY

Significant advances have been made in the potential and accuracy of diagnostics for neurosarcoidosis. Treatment should be approached within the context of the patient's anticipated clinical course, avoidance of adverse drug effects, and, if necessary, from the perspective of the comprehensive management of a chronic disease. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of sarcoidosis is strongly recommended.

Current management of sarcoidosis I: pulmonary, cardiac, and neurologic manifestations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease characterized by noncaseating granulomatous inflammation of multiple organ systems. Pulmonary, cardiac, and neurologic involvements have the worst prognosis. Current recommendations for the therapeutic management and follow-up of sarcoidosis involving these critical organs will be reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In those sarcoidosis patients requiring immunosuppressive therapy, corticosteroids are used first at varying doses depending on the presenting manifestation. Patients with symptomatic pulmonary, cardiac, or neurologic involvement will be maintained on corticosteroids for at least a year. Many require a second immunosuppressive agent with methotrexate used most commonly. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, especially infliximab, are effective and recommendations for their use have been proposed.

SUMMARY

Evidence-based treatment guidelines do not exist for most sarcoidosis clinical manifestations. Therefore, clinical care of these patients must rely on expert opinion. Patients are best served by a multidisciplinary approach to their care. Future research to identify environmental triggers, genetic associations, biomarkers for treatment response, and where to position new steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents is warranted.

Multiple sclerosis and sarcoidosis: A case for coexistence

Background

Patients with biopsy-proven systemic sarcoidosis who develop a chronic CNS disorder are often presumed to have neurosarcoidosis (NS), however, the possibility of comorbid neurologic disease, such as MS, must be considered if presentation and course are not typical for NS.

Methods

Retrospective chart review across 4 academic MS centers was undertaken to identify patients with diagnosis of MS (2017 McDonald criteria) and biopsy-confirmed extraneural sarcoidosis. Data were abstracted from each chart using a case report form that systematically queried for demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics relevant to NS and MS.

Results

Ten patients met our inclusion criteria (mean age 47.7 [±5.9] years; 80% female). Noncaseating granulomas consistent with sarcoidosis were found on biopsy in all cases (lung 7/10, mediastinum 2/10, liver 1/10, spleen 1/10, and skin 1/10). Diagnosis of MS was based on clinical history of MS-like relapses and MRI findings characteristic of demyelination and typical disease evolution during follow-up (average of 7 years). No patient developed features of NS that could be considered a "red flag" against the diagnosis of MS (such as meningeal enhancement, hydrocephalus, and pituitary involvement). All patients were treated with disease-modifying therapy for MS.

Conclusions

We propose a rational diagnostic approach to patients with sarcoidosis who may have comorbid MS. When the clinical picture is equivocal, the presence of multiple "MS-typical lesions" and the absence of any "NS-typical lesions" on MRI favor diagnosis of MS. Close follow-up is required to ascertain whether clinical and radiologic disease evolution and response to MS therapies conform to the proposed diagnosis of MS.

Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology of the Central Nervous System

Autoimmune disorders of the central nervous system are common and often affect people in the most productive years of their lives. Among primary autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system, multiple sclerosis is most prevalent in the United States. Many other autoantibody-mediated neurologic syndromes have been identified within the past 2 to 3 decades, including neuromyelitis optica and anti-N-methyl-D aspartate receptor encephalitis. Finally, the central nervous system can also be affected by systemic autoimmune diseases such as sarcoidosis. Many of these diseases are treatable when detected early.

Infliximab biosimilar for treating neurosarcoidosis: tolerance and efficacy in a retrospective study including switch from the originator and initiation of treatment

OBJECTIVES

Infliximab is increasingly used to treat neurosarcoidosis. We aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerance of an infliximab biosimilar for treating neurosarcoidosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study to describe the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of an infliximab biosimilar in neurosarcoidosis patients. We compared the survival time without relapse while receiving the biosimilar or previous originator-infliximab treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with histologically documented neurosarcoidosis were treated with an infliximab biosimilar (initiation of treatment in 12 and switch from the originator drug in 8) between February 2016 and August 2018. All patients presenting with neurological involvement of one or more areas, including meningeal (n = 15), cerebral (n = 10), spinal cord (n = 9), and/or cranial nerves (n = 5); epilepsy (n = 3); and/or intracranial hypertension (n = 3) were enrolled. Eighteen patients received glucocorticoids during infliximab treatment, and 16 had methotrexate or azathioprine concomitant treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 25 months (19-28). Six patients relapsed during biosimilar treatment. Relapse rates and time-to-relapse did not differ between the infliximab originator previously received and biosimilar treatment groups (p = 0.40 and 0.51, respectively). Nine patients experienced 11 adverse events with the infliximab biosimilar, including infections (n = 5), urticaria (n = 4), headache (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). All side effects were grade 2 or less using the WHO classification.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, the infliximab biosimilar was efficacious and safe for treating neurosarcoidosis.

Multiple cerebral infarcts: a rare complication of neurosarcoidosis

A 52-year-old man experienced a relapse of neurosarcoidosis, characterised by obstructive hydrocephalus and multiple posterior circulation infarcts. He was taking methotrexate, but his prednisolone was being weaned because of adverse effects. Stroke is rare in neurosarcoidosis and typically relates to granulomatous inflammation with a predilection for the perforator arteries. Sarcoidosis generally responds well to corticosteroids; however, patients with leptomeningeal involvement usually require additional immunosuppression as relapses can occur on weaning of corticosteroids. It is worth considering tumour necrosis factor-α antagonists for cases that progress despite first-line therapy.

Neurosarcoidosis in a public safety net hospital: a study of 82 cases

Objective

To characterize clinical presentation, laboratory and imaging data, and treatment outcomes for neurosarcoidosis in an urban safety net hospital.

Methods

The research database of Cook County Health and Hospitals system was queried for all cases of sarcoidosis from 2006 to 2013. These cases plus those identified through a survey of neurology faculty were reviewed and flagged if suspected to be neurosarcoidosis. Data were extracted in a standardized fashion, upon review by two experienced neurologists; patients were classified as definite, probable or possible neurosarcoidosis. Disagreements on classification were resolved by consensus conference.

Results

1706 cases of sarcoidosis were identified, with 82 (4.8%) classified as neurosarcoidosis. The cohort was predominantly African American (89%). Six were classified as definite, 34 as probable, and 42 as possible neurosarcoidosis. Neurosarcoidosis was the presenting symptom of sarcoidosis in 74% of cases. The most common presenting phenotype was myelopathy (21.7%), followed by optic nerve/chiasm involvement (16.0%) and epilepsy (11.3%). The facial nerve was involved in only 2% of cases. Chest x-ray showed abnormalities of sarcoidosis in 43.3% of cases, while chest CT did so in 78.6%. Corticosteroids were the initial treatment in 91% of cases, and outcomes were good in 53% of cases.

Conclusion

Neurosarcoidosis remains a challenging diagnosis with the majority of patients without a previous diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis. Chest imaging was supportive of the diagnosis in a majority of patients. Our cohort differs from others in the literature due to a low prevalence of facial nerve involvement. Prospective registry studies are needed.

Optic Neuropathy and Macular Ischemia Associated with Neurosarcoidosis: A Case Report

In this study, we present a case of bilateral optic neuropathy and macular ischemia in the right eye associated with neurosarcoidosis. A 26-year-old woman presented to our clinic with complaints of bilateral blurred vision. Bilateral granulomatous anterior uveitis, vitritis, optic neuropathy, and macular ischemia were detected in the right eye in slit-lamp examination. She also reported complaints of fever, weakness, sweating, arthralgia, and headache for 2 months. She was referred to the pulmonary diseases unit of our hospital due to hilar lymphadenopathy seen in her chest x-ray, and biopsies were taken for diagnostic purposes. Histological analysis of the mediastinal lymph node biopsies revealed chronic, non-caseating, granulomatous inflammation. Furthermore, the patient was referred to a neurologist due to concomitant complaint of intense headaches. She was diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis supported by findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging and lumbar puncture. She received a 3-day course of high-dose (1 g/day) intravenous steroid treatment (methylprednisolone) followed by a tapering dose of oral prednisone. The patient began receiving oral methotrexate 15 mg/week as a steroid-sparing agent. Significant improvement in neurological and ophthalmological symptoms occurred in the first week of treatment. In this case report, we emphasized that neurosarcoidosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with both bilateral optic neuropathy and macular ischemia. Furthermore, early diagnosis and timely treatment of neurosarcoidosis are important for favorable visual outcomes.

Neurosarcoidosis following Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by enhancing anti-tumor immunity. However, by virtue of stimulating the immune system, they can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Neurologic irAEs are uncommon but are becoming increasingly recognized and can be quite serious or even fatal. Furthermore, central nervous system (CNS) manifestations may be difficult to distinguish from CNS metastases, posing management challenges. Here, we describe a patient who developed exacerbation of sarcoidosis leading to CNS involvement following dual checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma and review the relevant literature.

Advances in Biomarker-Guided Therapy for Pediatric- and Adult-Onset Neuroinflammatory Disorders: Targeting Chemokines/Cytokines

The concept and recognized components of “neuroinflammation” are expanding at the intersection of neurobiology and immunobiology. Chemokines (CKs), no longer merely necessary for immune cell trafficking and positioning, have multiple physiologic, developmental, and modulatory functionalities in the central nervous system (CNS) through neuron–glia interactions and other mechanisms affecting neurotransmission. They issue the “help me” cry of neurons and astrocytes in response to CNS injury, engaging invading lymphoid cells (T cells and B cells) and myeloid cells (dendritic cells, monocytes, and neutrophils) (adaptive immunity), as well as microglia and macrophages (innate immunity), in a cascade of events, some beneficial (reparative), others destructive (excitotoxic). Human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies have been instrumental in revealing soluble immunobiomarkers involved in immune dysregulation, their dichotomous effects, and the cells—often subtype specific—that produce them. CKs/cytokines continue to be attractive targets for the pharmaceutical industry with varying therapeutic success. This review summarizes the developing armamentarium, complexities of not compromising surveillance/physiologic functions, and insights on applicable strategies for neuroinflammatory disorders. The main approach has been using a designer monoclonal antibody to bind directly to the chemo/cytokine. Another approach is soluble receptors to bind the chemo/cytokine molecule (receptor ligand). Recombinant fusion proteins combine a key component of the receptor with IgG1. An additional approach is small molecule antagonists (protein therapeutics, binding proteins, and protein antagonists). CK neutralizing molecules (“neutraligands”) that are not receptor antagonists, high-affinity neuroligands (“decoy molecules”), as well as neutralizing “nanobodies” (single-domain camelid antibody fragment) are being developed. Simultaneous, more precise targeting of more than one cytokine is possible using bispecific agents (fusion antibodies). It is also possible to inhibit part of a signaling cascade to spare protective cytokine effects. “Fusokines” (fusion of two cytokines or a cytokine and CK) allow greater synergistic bioactivity than individual cytokines. Another promising approach is experimental targeting of the NLRP3 inflammasome, amply expressed in the CNS and a key contributor to neuroinflammation. Serendipitous discovery is not to be discounted. Filling in knowledge gaps between pediatric- and adult-onset neuroinflammation by systematic collection of CSF data on CKs/cytokines in temporal and clinical contexts and incorporating immunobiomarkers in clinical trials is a challenge hereby set forth for clinicians and researchers.

Migraine is common in patients with sarcoidosis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of migraine and predictors of having migraine in sarcoidosis patients.

METHODS

The ID migraine questionnaire was administered to a well-phenotyped observational cohort of sarcoidosis patients (most of whom were seeking specialty care) and healthy controls. Predictors of migraine status were examined using univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Migraine was seen in 29% of 96 patients with sarcoidosis and 13% of 39 healthy controls, ( p = 0.049). Among those with sarcoidosis, in univariate regression analysis only female sex was predictive of having migraine, and in a multivariable regression female sex remained significant (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.2-18.2). There was no association between migraine and age, depression, dyspnea, immunosuppression use, or ESR.

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine is a common comorbidity in sarcoidosis patients. As such, better recognition and targeted treatment of migraine has the potential to improve quality of life as part of a comprehensive care plan for sarcoidosis patients.