Direct Anterior Approach: Risk Factor for Early Femoral Failure of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

In-Hospital Morbidity and Postoperative Revisions After Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) offers the potential for less soft tissue insult, improved early recovery, and reduced dislocation rates. However, complications are associated with the DAA, particularly during the learning curve. We compare the DAA learning curve experience with the posterior approach regarding in-hospital complications and revision rate.

METHODS

We evaluated systemic and local in-hospital complications associated with primary unilateral cementless THAs from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 in 4249 patients through a posterior approach and 289 patients through a DAA. All procedures were performed consecutively by high-volume surgeons who use a single approach in a nonselective manner. The DAA was performed by surgeon transitioning from the posterior approach, thus incorporating the learning curve. Demographics were comparable. Revision procedures were captured through a minimum 4-year follow-up. Analyses compared complication and revision rates.

RESULTS

The DAA group demonstrated shorter length of stay, procedure time, lower blood transfusion rate, and increased discharge to home rate. Local and major systemic in-hospital complications were rare and comparable between groups. The minor systemic complication rate was significantly greater for the posterior group (10.9% posterior vs 6.2% DAA, P < .05). Revision rate was significantly greater for the posterior group (2.7% posterior vs 0.7% DAA, P < .032). The incidence of revision for dislocation was 1.5% for the posterior approach vs 0.4% for the DAA.

CONCLUSION

There was an increased rate of in-hospital minor systemic complications and overall revision, predominantly due to instability, after THA by the posterior approach, in comparison with the DAA.

Cementless Stem for Femoral Neck Fractures in a Patient’s 10th Decade of Life: High Rate of Periprosthetic Fractures

Background:

Subsidence of cementless femoral stems in hemiarthroplasty (HA) and increased fracture rates are ongoing concerns of orthopedic surgeons when treating fractures in very old patients. Additionally, bone cement implantation syndrome may result in perioperative cardiac or pulmonary complications, especially in older patients, leading to morbidity and mortality. This study was performed to analyze possible subsidence and intraoperative fractures in a cohort of very old patients treated with cementless stems.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of patients aged ≥90 years with femoral neck fractures treated by uncemented HA and an anterior minimally invasive approach. Immediate full-weight bearing was allowed postoperatively. Pelvic radiographs were examined for subsidence immediately postoperatively and 6 weeks later.

Results:

We treated 109 patients (74% women; mean age, 93 years; range, 90-102 years) by HA from January 2010 to March 2016. The 30-day mortality rate was 16%, and the morbidity rate was 47%. There were 11 (12%) intraoperative fractures: 8 (Vancouver B₂) had to be addressed immediately during the primary operation, while 3 (1 Vancouver B₁ and 2 Vancouver A_G) were treated conservatively. One periprosthetic femoral fracture (Vancouver B₁) was documented during follow-up. In 17 patients, subsidence of >2.0 mm (median, 3.9 mm; range, 2.5-9.0 mm) was documented.

Conclusion:

Early subsidence was low in this very old cohort treated with an uncemented stem and not showing a periprosthetic fracture. The risk of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures was high. The use of uncemented implants in osteoporotic bone continues to be an intervention with high risk and should only be performed by experienced surgeons.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, Therapeutic study.

Impact of Femoral Stem Design on Failure After Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

An increased rate of complications related to femoral component failure has been described with less invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluated the incidence of femoral complications associated with the direct anterior approach for THA.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of the initial 1120 consecutive patients who underwent direct anterior THA by 2 surgeons.

RESULTS

A total of 899 patients (80.3%) had a 2-year follow-up (range, 2-8 years). Complications within 90 days occurred in 20 patients (1.8%): 10 calcar fractures, 1 greater trochanter fracture, 1 canal perforation, 3 hematomas, 2 dislocations, 2 superficial, and 1 deep infection. Nine patients (1%) underwent revision: 5 for aseptic femoral loosening (0.55%), 1 for periprosthetic joint infection, 1 for dislocation, 1 for hip flexor irritation, and 1 for a damaged polyethylene liner. Of the 5 patients with aseptic femoral loosening, 3 had a short, mediolateral tapered stem, 1 cemented stem, and 1 S-ROM stem placed to bypass a canal perforation. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening in the collared, fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated compaction broached or triple tapered proximal fit and fill stem designs (70.6% of all stems). Revision rate for femoral loosening was significantly higher for tapered wedge over HA-coated, compaction broached stems (P < .005).

CONCLUSION

Pain and function improved predictably with a 0.55% rate of femoral loosening at 2-year follow-up. Among collared, fully HA-coated and triple taper fit and fill femoral stems, there were no instances of revision for aseptic loosening vs 3 in the short stem, collarless mediolateral tapered group.

John Charnley Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior and Miniposterior Approach THA: Which Provides Better Functional Recovery?

BACKGROUND

The choice of surgical approach for THA remains controversial. Some studies suggest that the direct anterior approach (DAA) leads to less muscle damage than the miniposterior approach (MPA), but there is little high-quality evidence indicating whether this accelerates recovery, or whether this approach-which may be technically more demanding-is associated with component malposition or more complications.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does the DAA result in faster return to activities of daily living than the MPA? (2) Does the DAA have superior patient-reported outcome measures than the MPA? (3) Does the DAA result in improved radiographic outcomes than the MPA? (4) Does the DAA have a higher risk of complications than the MPA?

METHODS

Between March 1, 2013, and May 31, 2016, 116 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA were randomized to either the DAA or MPA; 15 patients withdrew after randomization, and one died 6 months after surgery from a stroke unrelated to the procedure. Recruitment stopped when 52 patients had been randomized into the DAA group and 49 in the MPA group (n = 101). After patient randomization, one high-volume surgeon performed all of the DAAs and three high-volume surgeons performed the MPA THAs. The groups did not differ in age (65 years; SD 11; range, 38-86 years), sex (52% women), or body mass index (mean 29 kg/m; SD 6 kg/m; range, 21-40 kg/m; all p > 0.40). Functional results included time to discontinue gait aids, discontinue all narcotics, and independence with various activities of daily living; accelerometer data evaluated activity level. Clinical and radiographic outcomes, Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, SF-12, and Harris hip scores to 1 year were also tabulated. The minimum followup was 365 days (mean ± SD, 627 ± 369 days).

RESULTS

There were slight differences in early functional recovery that favored the DAA versus the MPA: time to discontinue walker use (10 versus 15 days, p = 0.01) and time to discontinue all gait aids (17 versus 24 days, p = 0.04). There were no other differences in early functional milestones, although at 2 weeks after surgery, mean steps per day were 3897 (SD 2258; range, 737-11,010) for the DAA versus 2235 for the MPA (SD 1688; range, 27-7450; p < 0.01). There was no difference in activity monitoring at 1 year. There were no differences in patient-reported outcome scores between the groups. There was no difference in the radiographic parameters measured in the two groups, including leg length discrepancy, component position, or offset, and there was no subsidence observed in any hip. There was no difference in complications between the DAA and the MPA groups (8% [four of 52] versus 10% [five of 49]; p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the DAA and MPA approaches provided excellent early recovery with a low risk of complications. Patients undergoing the DAA had a slightly faster recovery, as measured by milestones of function and quantified by activity monitor data, but no substantive differences were evident at 2 months. Because the DAA is the less studied approach, longer term (> 1 year) complications may yet accrue, will be important to quantify, and may offset early benefits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Internet Promotion of Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty by Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty is of significant interest to both patients and surgeons, largely due to intense marketing. This study addressed the question, "What is the level of promotion of DAA total hip arthroplasty on the internet by American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) members?"

METHODS

An internet search was performed to identify surgeon-specific websites for each member of the AAHKS using the members' full name and a previously published set of criteria. Each website was evaluated utilizing a questionnaire to systematically identify claims made regarding proposed DAA-specific risks, benefits, as well as the presence/absence of supporting data.

RESULTS

We identified 1855 qualified websites. The DAA was referenced on 22.8% (423/1855) of these websites. Claims regarding DAA-specific benefits included less invasive/muscle sparing (46.3%), quicker recovery (45.2%), decreased pain (28.1%), decreased hospital stay (22.0%), and decreased dislocation risk (16.3%). Potential DAA risks including lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, periprosthetic/greater trochanteric fracture, and wound complication/hematoma were addressed on only 4.7%, 3.1%, and 1.7% of websites, respectively. Supporting peer-reviewed literature was identified on only 3.6% of DAA websites.

CONCLUSION

Over one-fifth of AAHKS members promoted the DAA on the internet. Member websites claimed DAA benefits such as faster recovery and decreased pain approximately 9 times more frequently than any potential risk of the procedure (P < .001). While AAHKS policy does not regulate member marketing, it is the responsibility of all orthopedic surgeons to disseminate accurate, validated information concerning the procedures we perform.