Ethnic or Racial Differences Revisited

Biological rhythms: a neglected factor of variability in pharmacokinetic studies

Biological rhythms may influence drug response (chronopharmacology) and some chronopharmacological studies have underlined the influence of time of day on drug pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. The aim of the present review is to underline how biological rhythms may interfere with drug kinetics and to try to underline when, how, and why taking into account the moment of administration of a drug. Many physiological factors, possibly implicated in different steps of the fate of drugs in the organism (e.g., absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) vary along the 24 h scale. Taking into account biological rhythms in kinetic studies, should be indicated when the concerned drug will be used in a chronobiological disease (e.g., asthma, cancer, depression, hypertension, gastrointestinal diseases, rheumatisms), etc. In case of a drug characterised by a high inter- and intra-variability, a narrow therapeutic range or when the drug will be further used following a once-a-day formulation. It is of importance to rigorously control factors which are known to influence pharmacokinetic processes in chronokinetic studies. Time of day has to be regarded as an additional variable to influence the kinetics of a drug.

Concentrations of scheduled prescription drugs in blood of impaired drivers: considerations for interpreting the results

We report the concentrations of scheduled prescription drugs in blood samples from people arrested in Sweden for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). The investigation covered a 2 year period 2004 (N = 7052 cases) and 2005 (N = 7759 cases) and was prompted by recent legislation stipulating zero-concentration limits in blood for controlled substances. However, prescription drugs are exempt from the zero-limit law provided that the medication was being used in accordance with a doctor's prescription. The blood concentrations of various psychoactive substances were compared with the limits of quantitation of the analytic method used and the so-called therapeutic concentration range according to various reference books and tabulations. Diazepam [N = 1950 (26%)] and nordazepam [N = 2168 (28%)] were the therapeutic agents most frequently identified in these forensic blood samples along with other benzodiazepines such as alprazolam [N = 430 (5.6%)], flunitrazepam [N = 308 (4.0%)], and nitrazepam [N = 222 (2.9%)]. The newer hypnotics, exemplified by zolpidem [N = 148 (1.9%)] and zopiclone [N = 111 (1.5%)], were also high on the list of psychoactive substances identified. Interpreting the concentration of a prescription drug in blood in relation to whether the person had taken an overdose or was abusing the substance in question is not always easy. The age, gender, degree of obesity, and ethnicity of the person concerned; the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug; polymorphism of drug-metabolizing enzymes as well as liver and kidney function and blood hematocrit need to be considered. Among preanalytic factors, stability of the drug in blood after sampling, the type of tubes and preservatives used, the dosage form and route of administration deserve consideration. When therapeutic drug monitoring concentrations are compared with forensic toxicology results, then the plasma-to-whole blood distribution ratio of the drug also needs to be considered. In blood samples from DUID suspects, the concentrations of many commonly used sedatives and hypnotics exceeded the accepted therapeutic limits, which gives an indication of the abuse potential of these types of medications.

The Interface of Multiculturalism and Psychopharmacology

The impact of culture and ethnicity on psychopharmacological drug response continues to be a topic of interest and research. Diagnostic issues among patients of different races and cultures and also the influence of race and culture of the treating clinician are factors to consider before pharmacotherapy is even prescribed, although it also appears to affect the type of pharmacotherapy prescribed as well. Culture and ethnicity may also influence the response rates to treatment with pharmacotherapy along with affecting the reporting of adverse effects, compliance with the treatment regimen, and perception of need for such treatments compared to alternative health beliefs. African Americans may be diagnosed with a more severe disorder compared to Caucasians, and African Americans may also receive comparatively different, and higher, doses for the same level of symptoms compared to white patients. Asian patients may require different doses of psychotropics compared to Caucasian patients. Some of these dosing differences may be explained by pharmacogenetic differences, whereas some may be explained by cultural perceptions of illness among the different patient populations. This interface between biology, ethnicity, and cultural issues poses a challenge for the practitioner to pay attention to the multiple factors that may influence an individual's response to pharmacotherapy.