Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy

Cartilage imaging in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common articular disorder encountered worldwide. Its successful evaluation (and eventual treatment) depends on establishing a set of criteria for measuring disease progression. An ideal measurement would evaluate changes in articular cartilage, where the primary pathology of the disease takes place. Plain radiographs are the simplest and most readily employable means of joint evaluation, and now microfocal radiographs have been developed, which magnify the radiograph and help portray the joint space more accurately. However, radiography, along with nuclear medicine scans, arthrography, and computed tomography (CT) scans, are limited in their use because they are unable to detect early cartilage abnormalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the advantages of multiplanar imaging, soft tissue contrast, and noninvasiveness. Like radiography, MRI can underestimate the extent of cartilage abnormality. The most sensitive technique for measuring superficial articular abnormalities is arthroscopy, and small-bore arthroscopes are being used to assess knee damage in conscious, nonsedated patients. However, it is not yet clear if arthroscopy can detect subtle changes over time, and vision can be blocked by cloudy synovial fluid. Finally, although it is usually well tolerated, arthroscopy is an invasive technique.

Magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (MR CCM): a method for accurate determination of articular cartilage thickness?

A method for the assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI is presented and its accuracy and reproducibility tested. Six specimens of human patellae were imaged, using a fat-suppressed FLASH 3D sequence, and sectioned with a high-precision band saw. The regional distribution of articular cartilage thickness was determined from the MR images and from the anatomical sections (intervals of 0.5 mm). With image analysis 50-90% of the image points were found to lie within exactly the same thickness interval in corresponding patterns, and less than 17% deviated more than 0.5 mm. More than 85% of all pixels were reproducible with MRI after new positioning of the joint. No influence of the read-out direction and no important differences between areas of thin and thick cartilage could be detected. The authors conclude that MR chondro-crassometry can provide accurate and reproducible information on cartilage thickness.

Coronal fat suppression fast spin echo images of the knee: evaluation of 202 patients with arthroscopic correlation

We optimized fat-suppressed fast spin echo (FS-FSE) parameters for coronal imaging of the knee and then evaluated the technique in a clinical setting. Five volunteers and 12 patients were used to evaluate various repetition (TR), echo (TE), and echo train lengths (ETL). Then, 202 patients underwent both knee MR imaging using coronal plane FS-FSE and arthroscopy. The coronal FS-FSE images were compared with radial multiplanar gradient-recalled echo (MPGRE), axial T1-weighted SE, and parasagittal double echo SE images. Proton density images (2,000/19) with an ETL of 2 best depicted the menisci, ligaments, and capsules. The conspicuity of osteochondral abnormalities depicted by the coronal FS-FSE imaging was significantly higher than for axial T1-weighted SE (p < .003) and parasagittal echo SE images (p < .003). The accuracy of the coronal FS-FSE imaging for medial and lateral meniscal tears was 91.6% and 87.6%, respectively. Combined imaging interpretation of the coronal FS-FSE, axial T1-weighted SE, and radial MPGRE imaging improved the accuracy for meniscal tears slightly over any sequence used alone, but the difference was not statistically significant. Fourteen capsular injuries were demonstrated by the coronal FS-FSE imaging. FS-FSE imaging in the coronal plane is a useful complementary sequence in MR examinations of the knee for the evaluation of meniscal tears, capsular injuries, and osteochondral abnormalities.

Osteoarthritis staging: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, gross pathology and histopathology in the rhesus macaque

Although osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of articular skeletal disability in humans, assessing progression (staging) with noninvasive methods remains a major clinical problem. Using the rhesus macaque animal model, the objective of this study was to compare OA staging by noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against gross pathology and histopathology. Right knee joints from 18 rhesus macaques were used in this study. Using a four-point ordinal scale for each of the above-mentioned modalities, the lateral and medial femoral condyle and tibial plateau of each knee joint was independently scored for OA severity, i.e. normal, mild OA, moderate OA and severe OA. Correlation between each staging system was performed using Stuart's Tau-c correlation coefficient. By our criteria, MRI staging correlated as well with gross pathology (tau = 0.75) and histopathology (tau = 0.80) as did gross pathology with histopathology (tau = 0.78). Our study shows that MRI is a promising noninvasive modality to evaluate the severity of OA. MRI appears to be sensitive for demarcating the presence and extent of focal OA cartilage lesions. However, at this time, while MRI is sensitive for detecting OA change it cannot distinguish between certain lesions such as superficial cartilage matrix fibrillation and hypertrophy both of which show elevated signal intensity.

Evaluation of meniscal tears: fast spin-echo versus conventional spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We compared the performance of fast spin-echo (FSE) with conventional spin-echo (CSE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences in the detection of meniscal tears.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients underwent MR examination of the knee for suspected internal derangement. Each patient was scanned with a CSE sequence and one of two FSE sequences. The primary difference between the two FSE sequences consisted of the echo train length (ETL). Thirty-seven patients (group 1) were scanned with the FSE I sequence (ETL = 8), and 36 patients (group 2) were scanned with the FSE II sequence (ETL = 4). Menisci were graded as torn or not torn on the basis of their MR appearance. The sequences were compared with each other and with the surgical findings in 31 patients who underwent arthroscopy.

RESULTS

In group 1, there was a significant discrepancy between the CSE and FSE I techniques (p = .006). The FSE I sequence detected only 11 of 19 surgically proven torn menisci as opposed to 18 of 19 detected with the CSE sequence. The FSE II sequence performed significantly better in group 2, with an accuracy equal to that of the CSE sequence.

CONCLUSION

FSE sequences are extremely technique dependent with regard to detecting meniscal tears and should not replace CSE sequences in this setting until further studies are performed to optimize the technique.