Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: surgical technique

INLINE RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC LIVER RESECTION: FIRST EXPERIMENT WITH STAPLING DEVICE

BACKGROUND

In liver surgery, the increase in advancement of laparoscopic equipment has allowed the feasibility and safety of complex laparoscopic liver resection. However, blood loss and the potential risk of gas embolism seem to be the main obstacles. In this study, we successfully used the InLine radiofrequency ablation (RFA) device to carry out laparoscopic hand-assisted liver resection in pigs.

METHODS

Under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation, pigs underwent InLine RFA-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. After installation of Hand Port and trocars, the InLine RFA device was introduced through Hand Port system and inserted into the premarked resection line. Then the generator was turned on and the power was applied according to the power setting. The resection was finally carried out using diathermy or stapler. For the control group, resection was simply carried out by diathermy or stapler.

RESULTS

Eight Landrace pigs underwent 23 liver resections. Blood loss was reduced significantly in the InLine group (P<0.001) when compared with control group in both surgical methods (diathermy and stapler).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we successfully carried out InLine RFA-assisted laparoscopic liver resection in both stapled and diathermy group. We showed that there was a highly significant difference between InLine and other liver resection techniques laparoscopically.

Laparoscopic intrahepatic Glissonian approach for right hepatectomy is safe, simple, and reproducible

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage from portal and hepatic veins is a major concern with laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH). The standard hilar approach is dissection of the portal pedicle outside the liver parenchyma with separate transection of the right hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile duct. Variations in anatomy can hamper vascular and biliary control. The intrahepatic Glissonian access avoids these risks by en masse ligation of the portal structures without dissection for each separately. This technique was performed laparoscopically for the last 2 among 10 LRHs, and the results are presented.

METHODS

Total LRH was performed under ultrasound assistance for two patients with malignancy. After lymph node sampling at the hepatoduodenal ligament, dissection was started with the incision of liver parenchyma posterior and anterior to the hilum, then continued outside the portal pedicle bifurcation toward the right and left sheaths. An endoscopic vascular stapling device was placed to transect the right portal pedicle en masse under direct laparoscopic vision and cholangiography guidance. Parenchymal transection and vascular control of the right hepatic vein was accomplished with harmonic scalpel, cavitron ultrasonic aspirator, bipolar diathermy, clips, and endoscopic stapling device, as appropriate. No Pringle's maneuver was used. The specimen was extracted through a suprapubic incision using an endobag.

RESULTS

The operative times for the two patients were, respectively, 180 and 240 min. No blood loss occurred during the intrahepatic Glissonian dissection. Intraoperative blood loss (from the right hepatic vein) of 700 and 800 ml, respectively, was controlled laparoscopically. The postoperative periods were uneventful, with discharge, respectively, on days 6 and 7. The surgical resection margins were free of tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic intrahepatic Glissonian approach used for right hepatectomy is safe, simple, and reproducible. It facilitates the hepatic hilar dissection with minimal operative risk. Further implementation of this technique is encouraged to improve the outcome for patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection.

Laparoscopy-assisted hepatic lobectomy using hilar Glissonean pedicle transection

Although many reports have described laparoscopic minor liver resections, major hepatic resection, including right or left lobectomy, has not been widely developed because of technical difficulties. This article describes a new technique for performing laparoscopy-assisted right or left hepatic lobectomy using hilar Glissonean pedicle transection. Laparoscopic mobilization of the right or left hepatic lobe is performed, including dissection of the round, faliciform, triangular, and coronary ligaments. The right or left Glissonean pedicle is encircled and divided laparoscopically. A parenchymal dissection is then performed though the upper median or right subcostal incision, through which the resected liver is removed. We successfully performed this procedure in 6 patients without blood transfusion or serious complications. Laparoscopy-assisted hepatic lobectomy using hilar Glissonean pedicle transection can be feasible and safe in highly selected patients.

Laparoscopy as a routine approach for left lateral sectionectomy

BACKGROUND

Since 1997, the authors have performed laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy of lesions of the liver in preference to open surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome.

METHODS

Between October 1997 and March 2005, 36 laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomies were performed using five trocars and a small incision for specimen retrieval. Liver resection was performed mainly using a harmonic scalpel and staplers. The Pringle manoeuvre was used in 24 patients.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 55.2 (range 31-80) years. Twelve patients had underlying cirrhosis. Surgery was performed for 20 malignant lesions and 16 benign lesions with a mean size of 42.7 (range 5-110) mm. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in one patient. The mean operating time was 171.5 (range 90-240) min. Operatiing time and use of the Pringle manoeuvre were significantly decreased in the second half of the series. Mean blood loss was 208 (range 50-600) ml. No transfusion was required. There were no deaths. Two patients had postoperative complications (one incisional hernia and one pneumonia). The median postoperative stay was 5.2 days.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach to left lateral sectionectomy was safe and feasible in this series and could be considered as a routine approach in selected patients.

Laparoscopic parenchymal division of the liver in a porcine model: comparison of the efficacy and safety of three different techniques

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is a known and CO2 embolization a suggested risk factor for increased morbidity after laparoscopic liver resection. Devices for laparoscopic liver parenchymal transection must be evaluated for safety in this context.

METHOD

Twelve piglets underwent laparoscopic surgery during CO2 pneumoperitoneum, each animal receiving three 6 cm long transections into the liver parenchyma made with ultrasonic dissector, ultrasonic shears and vessel sealing system, respectively. Endpoints were bleeding, operation time and gas embolization. The transections and embolization events, evaluated with transesophageal echocardiography, were video recorded. Bleeding and embolization were also assessed on video tapes and operating time measured. Arterial blood gases were recorded on line.

RESULTS

The ultrasonic dissector was least advantageous in terms of bleeding and operation time. Gas embolization was more frequent with the vessel sealing system than with the ultrasonic dissector and ultrasonic shears. During two episodes of gas embolization, pCO2 increased and pO2 and pH decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of all three devices is feasible. Bleeding and operation time are greatest with the ultrasonic dissector. Gas embolization occurs during transection, though in most instances it is completely harmless. Laparoscopic liver surgery with these techniques used may pose a risk of gas embolization with clinical implications. Monitoring for such events is probably to be recommended.

Comparison between staple and vessel sealing device for parynchemal transection in laparoscopic liver surgery in a swine model

BACKGROUND

Advancements in technology have allowed laparoscopic surgery to expand into advanced procedures such as liver resection; however, the transection method is debatable. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic liver resection comparing the vessel sealing device (VSD) versus endomechanical stapling devices for parenchymal transection in a swine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Laparoscopic left hepatectomy was performed in two groups (n=7 in each group) comparing the stapler device with the VSD. The cut surfaces of the liver were evaluated for bleeding and biliary leakage at the time of the operation and 1 week later. The animals were sacrificed 1 week after the operation to determine hemorrhage and bile leakage, and to allow histological evaluation of the liver. Serum liver enzymes were checked before, after, and 1 week postoperatively.

RESULTS

No evidence of biliary leakage or hemorrhage was noted at the time of the operation and 1 week later for both groups. There was a trend toward an increase in blood loss in the stapled group compared with LigaSure (40+/-16.4 cc vs 17+/-3.7 cc, p>0.05). There was also a trend toward shorter transection time in the stapled group compared with the LigaSure group (15+/-4.1 min vs 21.8+/-5.3, p>0.05). The instrument cost was significantly higher in the stapled group (720+/-110 vs 400+/-50; p<0.05). There was no difference in serial liver enzymes and liver histopathology in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The VSD and endomechanical stapler can be safely and effectively used for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic liver resection. However, using endomechanical staplers is associated with an increase in cost.

Laparoscopic liver surgery: Shifting the management of liver tumors

Laparoscopic liver surgery has evolved rapidly over the past 5 years in a select number of centers. The growing experience with these procedures has resulted in a shift in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to common liver tumors. The fact that resection of benign and malignant hepatic masses can now be accomplished laparoscopically with relatively low morbidity has influenced the decision-making process for physicians involved in the diagnosis and management of these lesions. For example, should a gastroenterologist or hepatologist seeing a 32-year-old woman with an asymptomatic 4 cm hepatic lesion that is radiologically indeterminate for adenoma or focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH): (1) continue to observe with annual computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) scans, (2) subject the patient to a liver biopsy, or (3) refer for laparoscopic resection? For a solitary malignant liver tumor in the left lateral segment, should laparoscopic resection be considered the new standard of care, assuming the surgeon can perform the operation safely? We present current data and representative case studies on the use of laparoscopic liver resection at 2 major medical centers in the United States. We propose that surgical engagement defined by the managing physician's decision to proceed with a surgical intervention is increasingly affected by the availability of, and experience with, laparoscopic liver resection.

Total laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

A 57-year-old man presented with a liver mass that had been detected on physical examination. The abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a 5-cm single nodular hepatoma located in segments 6 and 7. A total laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy was performed for this lesion. The anatomical demarcation of the posterior section was possible with selective control of a Glissonian pedicle to that section. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 13 without complications. The postoperative pathology confirmed a hepatocellular carcinoma with a 1-cm free resection margin. The patient had no evidence of recurrence at 12-month follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of total laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy in segments 6 and 7.

Laparoscopic liver resection using radiofrequency coagulation

BACKGROUND

The use of radiofrequency (RF) energy has been described to perform open liver resection safely and with minimal blood loss. Yet no data are available on the potential contribution of RF energy to the limitation of intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). The aim of this prospective, nonrandomized study was to investigate the potential contribution of RF energy to the limitation of intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing LLR.

METHODS

Forty-five patients [male/female ratio 22/23, age 57 years (26-80)] underwent LLR. Eleven benign and 47 malignant lesions (mostly colorectal metastases) were resected. Median number [1 (1-3)] and maximum diameter [40 mm (8-170)] of tumors as well as median tumor free margins [10 mm (1-30)] were comparable in patients undergoing LLR with (20 patients) or without (25 patients) RF-assistance. Thirty-eight minor (< or = 2 segments) and 9 major (> 3 segments) resections were performed. Eighteen patients simultaneously underwent additional surgery.

RESULTS

No mortality occurred. Median intraoperative blood loss was 200 (5-4000) ml and was similar in patients undergoing LLR with or without RF-assistance. The type of surgical procedure was a determinant for the amount of intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.0002). Significant bleeding occurred from large hepatic vessels at major resections. Median operation time was 115 (45-360) minutes. RF-assistance didn't seem to reduce perioperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

LLR can be performed with minimal intraoperative blood loss, which is determined by the type of hepatectomy. Significant intraoperative bleeding occurs from large hepatic vessels during major resections. RF-assisted parenchymal transection in LLR doesn't seem to reduce blood loss, operation time, or perioperative morbidity.

[Right hepatectomy and left hepatectomy performed via hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Description of an original technique]

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic liver surgery in solid tumors presents a number of difficulties. This type of surgery is indicated especially in tumors of less than 5 cm located in the left lobe and in anterior segments of the right lobe. Access to posterior lesions of the right lobe (segments VII and VIII) and performing major regulated hepatectomies (more than 3 segments) are at present difficult for liver surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

To present a regulated right hepatectomy (RH) and left hepatectomy (LH) performed via hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) using an original technique.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

RH was performed in a 70-year-old man with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma (pT2N0M1 sigmoid adenocarcinoma). LH was performed in a 44-year-old woman with a 16-cm hemangioma that had shown tumoral growth. Dissection of the hepatic artery was performed between ligations, and the portal vein was sectioned between ligations or with a vascular endostapler. Division of the bile duct and suprahepatic veins was performed with a vascular endostapler. Parenchymal dissection was carried out with a harmonic scalpel and dissection of intrahepatic veins of over 3 mm was performed with a 10-mm Ligasure Atlas.

RESULTS

The operating time for RH was 360 min, with no transfusion or complications, and length of hospital stay was 5 days. The operating time for LH was 240 min, requiring 2 U of blood, with no morbidity and a length of hospital stay of 4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

HALS allows major liver resections to be performed with low morbidity and mortality and with the advantages of laparoscopic surgery.

Hepatobiliary Surgery: Lessons Learned from Live Donor Hepatectomy

The liver is unique in the rapid tissue regeneration occurs after resection or injury, and affords the surgeon the opportunity to safely remove up to 60% to 70% of the liver volume for treatment of cancer or for use as a live donor graft for transplantation. The complex development of the liver and biliary system in utero results in multiple and complicated anatomic variations. The hepatobiliary surgeon of today must be able to integrate a broadening array of radiologic and liver resection techniques that may improve patient safety and surgical outcome. Equally important is the ability to quickly recognize postoperative complications so that prompt intervention can be instituted. Successful outcome requires a balance between sound judgement, technical acumen, and attention to detail. Herein, we provide lessons learned from live donor liver transplantation that are directly applicable to any patient undergoing major hepatic resection.

Laparoscopic-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy

The major impediment to a wider application of living donor hepatectomy, particularly of the right lobe, is its associated morbidity. The recent interest in a minimally invasive approach to liver surgery has raised the possibility of applying these techniques to living donor right lobectomy. Herein, we report the first case of a laparoscopic, hand-assisted living donor right hepatic lobectomy. We describe the technical aspects of the procedure, and discuss the rationale for considering this option. We propose that the procedure, as described, did not increase the operative risks of the procedure; instead, it decreased potential morbidity. We caution that this procedure should only be considered for select donors, and that only surgical teams familiar with both living donor hepatectomy and laparoscopic liver surgery should entertain this possibility.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy: indications and outcomes

We outline the indications, evaluate the degree of invasiveness, and analyze the outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy, mainly in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The important considerations in determining indications for laparoscopic hepatectomy include tumor size, type, and location. Nodular tumors smaller than 4 cm or pedunculated tumors smaller than 6 cm are suitable candidates. Concerning location, tumors in the lower segment or the left lateral segment are suitable. Regarding operative method, laparoscopic hepatectomy involving either partial hepatectomy or left lateral segmentectomy is a feasible, less invasive procedure. Operative time in our recent laparoscopic hepatectomy patients has decreased, with less bleeding. Furthermore, laparoscopic hepatectomy is less invasive than conventional hepatectomy on evaluation by the Estimation of Physiolic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system. Patients recovered more quickly after laparoscopic hepatectomy, which allowed shorter hospitalization. Both the 5-year survival rate for HCC and the survival rate without recurrence were nearly identical to those of open conventional hepatectomy, although further analysis will be necessary to reach definitive conclusions. In conclusion, laparoscopic hepatectomy avoids the disadvantages of standard hepatectomy in properly selected patients and is beneficial for patient quality of life, because it is a minimally invasive procedure when indications are strictly followed.

Laparoscopy-assisted right hepatic lobectomy using a wall-lifting procedure

This article describes a new technique for performing a laparoscopy-assisted right hepatic lobectomy using a hanger wall-lifting procedure. The patient is placed in the left semi-lateral position. A cholecystectomy and hemi-hepatic vascular inflow control are then performed through a midline incision, through which the resected liver can be removed. Next, the right lower chest and right upper abdominal wall are lifted by two wires vertical to the abdominal wall. Two ports, a 5-mm port in right lateral abdomen for forceps and a 12-mm port just right of the umbilicus for the laparoscope, are inserted. The obtained view of the operative field in the right upper abdominal cavity is thus excellent. The laparoscopy-assisted mobilization of the right hepatic lobe is done with the assistance of a hand inserted through the midline incision, including a dissection of the hepato-renal ligament, the right triangular ligament, and the right coronary ligament. A parenchymal dissection is then performed using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) and the resected specimen is passed through the midline incision without any morcellation of the liver. This procedure can minimize the length of the wound, while avoiding the lethal complications associated with pneumoperitoneum.

Video-assisted living donor hemihepatectomy through a 12-cm incision for adult-to-adult liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

There has been remarkable progress in recent technical innovations for laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, a laparoscopic procedure rarely has been indicated for donation of the liver in living-related liver transplantation (LRLT). Here, we described the technique and the outcome of video-assisted donor hepatectomy (VADH) for adult-to-adult LRLT.

METHODS

For 13 donors in adult-to-adult LRLT, 3 types of major hepatectomy--right hemihepatectomy (3), and left hemihepatectomy, with or without the caudate lobe (10)--were performed through video-assisted procedures; surgical manipulation via ports or via a 12-cm incision and viewing through a laparoscope or through incision were combined and used.

RESULTS

VADH was completed in 13 donors, with a median operation time of 363 +/- 33 minutes and a median blood loss of 302 +/- 191 mL. No complications specific to video-assisted procedures, postoperative bile leak, or bleeding were observed. The restoration of the liver function was smooth, and the use of an analgesic (median: 1.2 times) was reduced, compared with the historical control (median: 3.8 times) that underwent a standard donation of the liver. Currently, all donors are healthy and have returned to their previous activities. The grafts have been functioning well, excluding 3 recipients who succumbed to serious complications unrelated to the video-assisted procedure.

CONCLUSION

We have shown a new method of VADH through a 12-cm laparotomy for adult-to-adult LRLT. This technique is as feasible as standard open donor hepatectomy, with less pain and with improved postoperative symptoms.

Laparoscopic hepatic resection using saline-enhanced electrocautery permits short hospital stays

Laparoscopic hepatic resection has been reported to yield lower morbidity and shorter hospital stays than open resection. However, few studies have evaluated patient and technical factors associated with short hospital stays. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatic resection at our institution from May 2002 to February 2004. Patient and operative factors were analyzed with respect to time to discharge. Seventeen patients underwent 10 wedge resections and seven segmentectomies or bisegmentectomies. There were no mortalities, conversions to open procedure, clinically evident bile leaks, or transfusion requirements. Eleven patients were discharged within 24 hours. When compared with those discharged later than 24 hours, there were fewer patients with advanced ASA classification (0 versus 3 in ASA class 3, p < 0.05). With appropriate patient selection, laparoscopic hepatic resections may be safely performed, result in short hospital stays, and are facilitated by technologies such as saline-enhanced electrocautery and endoscopic ultrasound. Information reflected in advanced ASA class may predict patients unlikely to be discharged within 24 hours.

Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The improvement of renal allograft survival by pre-transplantation transfusions alerted the medical community to the potential detrimental effect of transfusions in patients being treated for cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The present meta-analysis aims to evaluate the role of perioperative blood transfusions (PBT) on colorectal cancer recurrence. This is accomplished by validating the results of a previously published meta-analysis (Amato 1998); and by updating it to December 2004.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published papers were retrieved using Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, controlled trials web-based registries, or the CCG Trial Database. The search strategy used was: {colon OR rectal OR colorectal} WITH {cancer OR tumor OR neoplasm} AND transfusion. The tendency not to publish negative trials was balanced by inspecting the proceedings of international congresses.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer (classified either as Dukes stages A-C, Astler-Coller stages A-C2, or TNM stages T1-3a/N0-1/M0) were included if they had received any amount of blood products within one month of surgery. Excluded were patients with distant metastases at surgery, and studies with short follow-up or with no data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A specific form was developed for data collection. Data extraction was cross-checked, using the most recent publication in case of repetitive ones. Papers' quality was ranked using the method by Evans and Pollock. Odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence intervals) were computed for each study, and pooled estimates were generated by RevMan (version 4.2). When available, data were stratified for risk factors of cancer recurrence.

MAIN RESULTS

The findings of the 1998 meta-analysis were confirmed, with small variations in some estimates. Updating it through December 2004 led to the identification of 237 references. Two-hundred and one of them were excluded because they analyzed survival (n=22), were repetitive (n=26), letters/reviews (n=66) or had no data (n=87). Thirty-six studies on 12,127 patients were included: 23 showed a detrimental effect of PBT; 22 used also multivariable analyses, and 14 found PBT to be an independent prognostic factor. Pooled estimates of PBT effect on colorectal cancer recurrence yielded overall OR of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.67) against transfused patients in randomized controlled studies. Stratified meta-analyses confirmed these findings, also when stratifying patients by site and stage of disease. The PBT effect was observed regardless of timing, type, and in a dose-related fashion, although heterogeneity was detected. Data on surgical techniques was not available for further analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated meta-analysis confirms the previous findings. All analyses support the hypothesis that PBT have a detrimental effect on the recurrence of curable colorectal cancers. However, since heterogeneity was detected and conclusions on the effect of surgical technique could not be drawn, a causal relationship cannot still be claimed. Carefully restricted indications for PBT seems necessary.

Laparoscopic liver resection: experience of 53 procedures at a single center

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The short-term outcome following laparoscopic liver resection at a single center is presented.

METHODS

Fifty-three procedures were carried out in 47 patients, between August 1998 and April 2004 (6 patients were resected on two occasions). A previous laparotomy and/or hepatectomy had been done in 83% and 26% of the procedures, respectively. Colorectal metastasis was the main indication for treatment (42/53). A total laparoscopic approach was applied.

RESULTS

Three of the 53 (6%) procedures were converted to laparotomy. In one additional procedure, radiofrequency ablation was done instead of resection. Sixty liver resections were done during the 49 procedures completed laparoscopically as planned (9 patients had concomitant resections performed). Nonanatomic (45/60) and anatomic (15/60; left lobectomies) resections were done. Tumor tissue was found in the resection margins of 6% of the specimens. The free margin was very short in 8% of the specimens. The morbidity was 16%. There was no mortality. Blood transfusions were given following 26% of the procedures. The median hospital stay was 3.5 days (range, 1-14 days) and the median number of days on which there was a need for opioids was 1 (range, 0-11 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic liver resection can be performed safely and seems to offer short-term benefits to the patients. Randomized studies are required to further evaluate the potential benefits of this treatment.

[Laparoscopic resection of solid liver tumors. Presentation of our experience]

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of solid liver tumors (SLT) has not become widespread due to technical problems, the risk of air embolism, and possible tumoral spread in malignant lesions. We present our experience of LLR in SLT.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between January 2003 and May 2005, we performed the laparoscopic approach in 16 patients with SLT. Preoperative diagnosis was liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma in 11 patients and benign tumor in the remaining five patients. Five of the lesions were located in the left lobe, another 10 in the right lobe (two in S. V, four in S. VI and four in S. VII) and the remaining lesion was bilobar (S. III and VI). LLRs were performed by complete laparoscopic hepatectomy (CLH) (n=8) and assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy (ALH) (n=8). LLR was completed in 13 patients (81%). Surgical technique (n=13) consisted of three left lobectomies, one with partial resection of S. IV, three bisegmentectomies (two of S. VI and VII and one of S. III and IV, the latter associated with metastasectomy in S. VIII), five segmentectomies (one of S. II, two of S. V and two of S. VI, one of the latter associated with metastasectomy in S. VII) and two local resections of benign tumors.

RESULTS

There was no intra- or postoperative mortality. With CLH the LLR was completed in five patients (62%), whereas with ALH there were no conversions. Only one of the 13 resected patients required transfusion. Seventeen nodules were excised in the 13 LLR, and 12 of 17 required the Pringle maneuver. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.9 days (3-14 days). Only one female patient (7.7%) developed an infected hematoma, requiring radiological drainage.

CONCLUSION

LLR of benign SLTs shows all the advantages of laparoscopy. In the case of malignant lesions, greater experience is needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the open approach.

Laparoscopic surgery: current status, issues and future developments

Laparoscopic surgery has come a long way since its introduction two decades ago. In essence it represents a new era of technology-dependent surgical interventions, and to some extent its future progress depends on the growth of interventional technologies and devices (facilitative, enabling and additive). Laparoscopic surgery has had a significant impact on all surgical disciplines and is now firmly embedded in routine surgical practice. There remain, however, several outstanding issues that need to be addressed. These concern mainly quality assurance, training, resource allocation, assessment of competence and tiers of laparoscopic surgical practice in line with the changing situation facing the next generation of surgeons.

Two-stage laparoscopic resection of colon cancer and metastatic liver tumour

We report herein the case of 70-year-old woman in whom colon cancer and a synchronous metastatic liver tumour were successfully resected laparoscopically. The tumours were treated in two stages. Both postoperative courses were uneventful, and there has been no recurrence during the 8 months since the second procedure.

Laparoscopic resection of hepatic colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND

Liver resection for secondary malignancy has become the standard of care in appropriately staged patients, offering 5-year survival rates of >40%. Reports of laparoscopic liver resection have been published with increasing frequency over the last few years. In these small series approximately one-third of all operations have been for malignancy, but survival figures cannot be assessed yet.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all laparoscopic liver resections performed by four surgeons in Brisbane between 1997 and 2004 was done. Follow-up was by regular patient review and telephone confirmation.

RESULTS

Of 84 laparoscopic liver resections, 33 (39%) were for malignancy; 28 of these were for metastases (22 colorectal). Thirteen patients had left lateral sectionectomy with minimal morbidity; nine right hepatectomies were attempted and six cases of segmental or subsegmental resection were performed. Survival rates in 12 patients followed for 2 years with colorectal secondaries were 75% with 67% disease-free.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic liver resection is feasible in highly selected cases of malignant disease. Patients need to be appropriately staged and surgeons need a broad experience of open liver surgery and advanced laparoscopic procedures.