Geriatric oncology: challenges for the new century

Perceptions of older people with cancer of information, decision making and treatment: a systematic review of selected literature

BACKGROUND

Several studies have identified inadequacies in the care and treatment received by older patients with cancer, as opposed to their younger counterparts. These include over or under diagnosis, ineffective symptom management and lower survival rates in older people with cancer. Despite these inadequacies, there is a lack of evidence of older peoples' perspectives regarding their cancer diagnosis and treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies for review were identified from systematic searches of literature published between January 1990 and November 2003, using PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO. Studies were selected for inclusion by using a number of criteria (i.e. date and language of publication, age of participants and thematic area). The aims of the review were to summarize and evaluate previous evidence on the views of older patients with cancer, regarding information, decision making and treatment.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies of various methodologies met the criteria of the present review. In summary, older people with cancer are generally content with the information they receive, but not entirely satisfied with the quantity and quality of care and contact. They present with various needs, which are not always well met. Finally, they wish to be kept informed of their cancer diagnosis and treatment progress, but often do not wish to be told about progression of their illness and length of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous research has suffered a number of limitations regarding sampling procedures and methods of data collection. Other limitations included lack of consideration of the heterogeneity of older people with cancer and lack of a well-defined theoretical framework to guide design and data analysis. These may compromise not only rigour and the ability to generalize findings, but also the provision of patient-focused care. The difficulties of doing research in this area are also discussed and suggestions for future research are made.

Recent increase in cancer survival according to age: higher survival in all age groups, but widening age gradient

A major increase in long-term survival of cancer patients in the 1990s has recently been demonstrated. It is unclear, however, to what extent this increase has been shared by cancer patients at various ages. Using the 1973-2000 data base of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results programme, recent increase in 10-year relative survival of cancer patients in the US was assessed for 4 major age groups and 15 major cancer sites by comparing results of a period analysis for the 1996-2000 period with results of a cohort analysis for patients diagnosed in 1986-1990. Period estimates of 10-year relative survival for all forms of cancer combined in 1996-2000 were 66.1%, 58.8%, 56.3% and 47.1% for age groups 15-54, 55-64, 65-74 and > or = 75 years, respectively. They were 7.4%, 10.4%, 7.8% and 3.0% units higher than the respective 1986-1990 cohort estimates for these age groups. The increase in 10-year relative survival strongly varied by cancer site, but it was generally less pronounced in older than in younger patients. We conclude that long-term survival expectations of cancer patients have increased in all age groups in the 1990s. However, for most common forms of cancer, the age gradient in survival has either persisted or widened.

Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Doses of Capecitabine in the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer in Older Women

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine in older women with advanced breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

Seventy-three eligible patients (median age, 73 years; range, 65 to 89 years) were enrolled. The first 30 patients received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. Due to the occurrence of two toxic deaths, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily was given to the subsequent 43 patients.

Results

All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. A total of 351 treatment cycles were administered (median, six per patient; range, one to eight cycles). Dose reductions due to toxicities were required in 30% of patients in the standard-dose group, but capecitabine was given without a dose reduction to 95% of patients in the low-dose group. Capecitabine demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The overall incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was low: the most common events reported in ≤ 10% of the patients were fatigue, diarrhea, dyspnea, and nausea. In the standard-dose group, the response rate was 36.7% (95% CI, 19.9% to 56.1%). An additional seven patients had disease stabilization at ≥ 24 weeks. In the low-dose group, the response rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 21% to 50.9%). An additional 15 patients had prolonged stabilization. The median time to disease progression was 4 months in either group.

Conclusion

This study shows that capecitabine is safe and effective in the elderly breast cancer patient. Based on the overall results, the capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily merits consideration as “standard” for older patients who do not have severely impaired renal function.

Older women and breast cancer screening: research synthesis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To identify the most beneficial ways to support older women as they make screening decisions using a systematic, epidemiologic, narrative review of research regarding benefits and burdens of breast cancer screening and treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Medical and nursing research databases emphasizing women aged 60 and older.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Older women can tolerate screening and treatment, yet they are underserved. The most frequently cited reason to explain this phenomenon is declining health status associated with aging. Research evidence does not support this claim. No evidence clearly describes relationships among health status, aging, and less screening or less aggressive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Older women experience varied health problems. However, indications that they are less able than their younger counterparts to tolerate screening or treatment for breast cancer do not exist.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Further research in all aspects of breast cancer care in older women is required to define and describe risks and benefits of screening within a context of aging and changing health. Nurses should discuss the risks and benefits of screening with older women.

Increased dose-intensity of gemcitabine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multicenter phase II study in elderly patients from the "polmone toscano group" (POLTO)

Gemcitabine is usually administered at a planned dose-intensity (DI) from 750 to 800 mg/m2/week. Preclinical data have suggested a possible dose-response relationship of gemcitabine. A multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity in terms of no progression rate (complete responses+partial responses+stable diseases) of gemcitabine administered at an increased DI (1000 mg/m2/week) in elderly advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate tolerability, progression free survival and overall survival. Elderly (age>or=70 years) chemo-naive advanced NSCLC patients, ECOG PS 0-2, were treated with intravenous gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 intravenous (30 min infusion) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for four courses. One hundred and twenty-two patients with a median age of 75 years (range 70-84) entered the study. The following grade 3 (NCI-CTC) haematological toxicities were reported (percent of patients): neutropenia 2.4%, thrombocytopenia 1.6%, anaemia 2.4%. No grades 3-4 non-haematological toxicities were observed. Among 111 evaluable patients 52 (46.8%) no progressions, 17 (15.3%) partial responses (WHO criteria), 35 (31.5%) stable diseases and 59 (53.2%) progressions were observed. Median time to progression was 3.2 months and median duration of survival was 5.4 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 27%. Although increased dose-intensity of gemcitabine in elderly NSCLC patients is feasible without severe toxicities, this does not seem to be associated with an increased activity and efficacy in comparison to standard gemcitabine regimens with lower dose-intensities.

Breast-conserving therapy for stage I-II breast cancer in elderly women

PURPOSE

To assess breast-conserving therapy results in elderly patients with early-stage breast cancer (clinical Stage I-II).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1979 and 1998, 196 women (200 treated breasts) aged > or =70 years (median age, 72.5 years) were treated with breast-conserving therapy (lumpectomy or quadrantectomy with axillary lymph node dissection and radiotherapy). Pathologic axillary node involvement was found in 51 patients (28%). Two-thirds of patients received tamoxifen, and 16% received chemotherapy.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 59 months, 3 patients (1.5%) had developed local recurrence and 20 (10.2%) distant metastases. The overall survival rate was 81% and 62% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The corresponding disease-specific survival rates were 92% and 88%. Axillary nodal involvement was the only statistically significant risk factor for the development of metastases (p = 0.0035). Arm mobility impairment and arm lymphedema each occurred in 5 patients. In another 5 patients, a thromboembolic event occurred during tamoxifen treatment.

CONCLUSION

Elderly women tolerate breast-conserving therapy, including radiotherapy, well and have excellent rates of locoregional control and disease-specific survival.

Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population

Modifications to bodily functions and physiology are known to occur with age. These changes can have a considerable impact on the pharmacokinetic processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and the pharmacodynamic properties of administered drugs. For many drugs with a high therapeutic index, this will be clinically unimportant, but for anticancer drugs, which usually have a low therapeutic index, these pharmacological changes can lead to dramatic consequences, such as excessive drug concentrations and unacceptable toxicity, or subtherapeutic drug concentrations and ineffective treatment. Despite the increased susceptibility of the elderly to these changes, doses are rarely adapted on the basis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, with the exception of changes secondary to altered renal function. Until recently, only a few large prospective randomised trials have provided evidence-based data for dose adaptations in elderly patients. However, with increasing knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs, advances in the knowledge of pharmacokinetic behaviour with aging, and documented efficacy and toxicity data in the elderly population, it is possible to highlight aspects of prescribing anticancer drugs in the elderly. In general, and for most drugs, age itself is not a contraindication to full-dose chemotherapy. The main limiting factors are comorbidity and poor functional status, which may be present in a significant number of the elderly population. Elderly patients with cancer are part of the daily practice of oncologists, but currently clinicians can often only estimate whether dose modification is advantageous for the elderly. This review attempts to elucidate the factors that can influence the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs frequently used in the elderly, and the clinical or biochemical parameters that form the basis for dose adjustments with age.

Establishing a nursing research agenda in gero-oncology

Expanding the evidence base of cancer in the elderly is critical to advance the specialty of geriatric oncology nursing. This article will propose topics for nursing investigation relative to prevention and early detection, response to disease and treatment, and psychosocial responses in the elderly at risk for, or having cancer. International considerations for undertaking nursing research with this special population are also described. Current dilemmas requiring investigation and future demographic implications are highlighted.

Colorectal cancer in the elderly: is palliative chemotherapy of value?

Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly, with 70% of patients being aged 65 years or older. In Western countries, the total number of elderly patients with this disease is expected to further increase in the future. Since the incidence of adverse physical or socioeconomic conditions in the elderly is higher than in younger patients, a thorough assessment of the patient's suitability for therapy should be performed before a decision is made. Using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to subdivide the population of elderly cancer patients into three groups can help to guide treatment decisions. Both in the adjuvant and in the palliative setting, there are sufficient data supporting the use of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in fit elderly patients who can tolerate cytotoxic treatment. Systemic chemotherapy has been shown to effectively reduce mortality in the adjuvant situation and to be of clinical benefit for patients with metastatic disease in terms of longer survival, control of symptoms and quality of life. In recent years, new substances such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan have shown significant activity in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, information on how to guide the use of these new drugs in elderly patients is still lacking. Limited data from clinical trials indicate treatment efficacy in selected elderly patients comparable to that observed in younger patients, with overall manageable toxicity. Clearly, further clinical trials in elderly patients with colorectal cancer are necessary as well as the incorporation of aspects of geriatric medicine into the teaching programme of medical oncologists.

Geriatric oncology: a clinical approach to the older patient with cancer

Due to the ageing of the population and the sharp increase in life expectancy, cancer in the older person has become an increasingly common problem in the Western world. Although several authors have stressed that elderly cancer patients deserve special attention as a target group for research efforts, older aged patients are still less likely to be offered participation in clinical trials. The cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating the physiological process of ageing and senescence are far from understood, although inflammation is likely to play an important role, at least in some cancers. In addition, the relationship between ageing and cancer risk is also far from understood. One of the most intriguing aspects of ageing is how different the ageing process is from person to person; the basis for this variation is largely unknown. Population-based studies and longitudinal surveys have shown that comorbidity and physical and mental functioning are important risk factors; thus, a meaningful assessment of comorbidity and disability should be implemented in clinical practice. Modern geriatrics is targeted towards patients with multiple problems. Such patients are not simply old, but are geriatric patients because of interacting psychosocial and physical problems. As a consequence, the health status of old persons cannot be evaluated by merely describing the single disease, and/or by measuring the response, or survival after treatment. Conversely, it is necessary to conduct a more comprehensive investigation of the 'functional status' of the aged person. A geriatric consultation provides a variety of relevant information and enables the healthcare team to manage the complexity of health care in the elderly; this process is referred to as the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The use of CGA is now being introduced into oncological practice. The definition of frailty is still controversial and represents a major issue of debate in clinical geriatrics. As the frail population increases, clinical trials in frail persons are needed. The usefulness of these trials requires a consensus as to the definition of frailty. Clearly, the management of older persons with cancer requires the acquisition of special skills in the evaluation of the older person and in the recognition and management of emergencies as well as experience in geriatric case management.

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine prolongs survival and improves quality of life in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have also suggested that gemcitabine is well tolerated and effective in such patients. We compared the effectiveness and toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine with those of each drug given alone in an open-label, randomized phase III trial in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients aged 70 years and older, enrolled between December 1997 and November 2000, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) of body surface area), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m(2)), or vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)). All treatments were delivered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the Mantel-Haenszel test. Secondary endpoints were quality of life and toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 698 patients available for intention-to-treat analysis, 233 were assigned to receive vinorelbine, 233 to gemcitabine, and 232 to vinorelbine plus gemcitabine. Compared with each single drug, the combination treatment did not improve survival. The hazard ratio of death for patients receiving the combination treatment was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.44) that of patients receiving vinorelbine and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.29) that of patients receiving gemcitabine. Although quality of life was similar across the three treatment arms, the combination treatment was more toxic than the two drugs given singly.

CONCLUSION

The combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine is not more effective than single-agent vinorelbine or gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Filgrastim in patients with neutropenia: potential effects on quality of life

Treatment- and disease-related neutropenia are associated with a number of negative clinical effects such as febrile neutropenia, documented infection, hospitalisation for infection-related morbidity, infection-related mortality, and decreased ability to administer the planned chemotherapy dose on schedule. Reductions or delays in dosage have the ability to jeopardise the effectiveness of treatment by lowering response rates. Not only are clinical outcomes adversely affected, but these complications can have a negative influence on patient quality of life. Filgrastim is a haematopoietic growth factor that primarily acts to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil progenitor cells. Filgrastim is capable of reducing the incidence and severity of neutropenia and the complications that accompany it in patients with cancer or HIV infection. Although there are few data evaluating the effect of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on quality of life, it is assumed that the benefits would be seen through both the reduction of treatment-related complications and the enhanced potential for long-term disease control. A new, longer-acting form of filgrastim is now available that has the potential to simplify the management of neutropenia and further improve patient quality of life by decreasing the number of necessary injections. Additional prospective controlled trials that contain quality-of-life issues as endpoints are needed.

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer-report of a European expert panel

The anthracyclines doxorubicin and epirubicin, and the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel, are effective chemotherapeutic agents for the first-line and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and their clinical use is widespread. However, for women whose disease has progressed despite receiving these drugs, treatment options are limited. These women often have a good performance status, and may survive for many months or even years, so they should be given the opportunity to benefit from further chemotherapy. The goals of chemotherapy in these patients are to obtain maximum control of symptoms, prevent serious complications, and increase survival without diminishing quality of life. Several agents are used for this purpose, including fluorouracil, docetaxel (in patients who have already received paclitaxel), vinorelbine, and mitomycin c, but because data from controlled trials are limited, a standard regimen has not yet been established. Moreover, these agents may be inconvenient to administer and can be associated with adverse events requiring hospitalisation. Therefore, there is a clear need for additional therapeutic options for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ideally, agents should have a convenient method of administration, eg, oral, and should be suitable for home-based rather than hospital-based therapy. Treatment should control disease in at least 20-30% of patients with an acceptable side-effect profile. Novel oral therapies have now been developed and are being used increasingly in patients whose disease has progressed following taxane therapy.

Strategies for improving quality of life in older patients with metastatic breast cancer

Given both the increase in the mean age of the population of Western countries and the high incidence of breast cancer beyond the age of 65 years, it is evident that breast cancer in older women will be a very common problem for the medical oncologist. Metastatic breast cancer is still not amenable to a cure; therefore quality of life during therapy is an important issue, which until recently has been poorly investigated. Similarly, despite recent advances in breast cancer therapy, physicians have been reluctant to enrol older patients in clinical trials, and there is a lack of data regarding this population. This review focuses on quality-of-life issues during metastatic breast cancer treatment in geriatric patients, comparing the standard therapeutic options and newer approaches. Although first-line endocrine therapy with tamoxifen remains a standard treatment, the newer third-generation aromatase inhibitors provide similar or better efficacy with fewer adverse effects and a better quality of life. It has been a common belief that chemotherapy impairs quality of life, but recent studies in advanced breast cancer have shown that this therapy has a positive effect on quality of life, at least in responders. Consequently, chemotherapy should not be denied to elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer, provided a prior geriatric assessment is performed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio. New chemotherapy strategies, such as the taxanes and orally administered chemotherapy, represent a very attractive alternative for a better quality of life in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Does chemotherapy have a role as palliative therapy for unfit or elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer?

Elderly patients and younger "unfit" patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (> or = 2) suffering from advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are two different populations--both of which require palliative treatments. Elderly patients frequently experience progressive decline of organ function and multiple comorbidities, which need to be considered when choosing therapy. ECOG 1594 showed that advanced NSCLC patients with an ECOG PS of 2 did not tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin/paclitaxel, carboplatin/paclitaxel, cisplatin/docetaxel, carboplatin/paclitaxel). These data confirm that treatments designed specifically for this patient subset are needed. Single-agent chemotherapy seems to be a reasonable approach, and non-platinum-based combination chemotherapy should also be investigated. The oncology community has become increasingly aware of the magnitude of the problem of cancer in the elderly. More than 30% of lung cancers arise in patients > or = 70 years old. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly, according to the few published papers, and are not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy in clinical practice. A phase III randomized trial (ELVIS [Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study]) demonstrated survival and quality-of-life benefits with single-agent vinorelbine versus best supportive care. Among the newer drugs, gemcitabine has demonstrated activity and low toxicity in phase II studies. With this background, we performed a randomized, multicenter phase III trial (MILES [Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study]) in 707 advanced NSCLC elderly patients. The MILES study compared single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine versus polychemotherapy with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine. Results showed no benefit in response rate, time to progression, survival, and quality of life for the combination. Single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard treatment approach for elderly NSCLC patients with advanced disease.

Age-specific differences in treatment and survival of patients with cervical cancer in the southeast of The Netherlands, 1986-1996

Age at diagnosis has been proven to be an important determinant of the choice of initial treatment for several sites of cancer. Elderly patients are more likely to receive no treatment or less intensive treatment modalities. This study analysed the influence of age on treatment choice and survival in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer. This population-based study used data on 1176 new cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in the period of 1986-1996 from three regional cancer registries in the Netherlands. All available information on treatment and survival (on 1 January 1998) was recorded. Relative survival rates were calculated according to the Hakulinen method. Relative risks (RR) for excess mortality due to the diagnosis of cervical cancer were calculated with a regression model for relative survival rates. Only 5% of the patients aged 70 years and older (n=224) were diagnosed with stage IA disease, compared with 11 and 30% of the patients aged 50-69 years and 49 years and younger, respectively. Almost 50% of the 70+ patients with stage IB-IIA were treated with radiotherapy as a single treatment modality, whereas 64% of the patients aged < or =49 years were treated with surgery alone. In all age groups, treatment for advanced stage disease (stage > or =IIB) was radiotherapy alone. No treatment was given to 10% of the patients aged 70 years and older, 5% of those aged 50-69 years and 1% of those aged 49 years and younger. Five-year relative survival was 69% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 66-72%) and differed significantly (P=0.001) with age (70+ years: 49%; 50-69 years 58%; < or =49 years: 81%). Multivariate analyses on a subset of patients showed that age was not an independent prognostic factor, whereas stage and treatment modality were very important prognostic factors. Although elderly cancer patients were sometimes treated differently from younger patients, this was in accordance with the guidelines. Relative survival rates differed significantly by age. The multivariate analyses on the subset of patients also revealed that excess mortality increased with age. However, when adjustment was made for stage and treatment, this difference disappeared. The influence of treatment on survival is likely to be due to the selection of patients based on other characteristics, such as tumour volume, comorbidity and performance status.

Impact of age and colony-stimulating factor use on hospital length of stay for febrile neutropenia in CHOP-treated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

In intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients, full-dose CHOP improves survival but increases myelosuppression, causing febrile neutropenia hospitalization (FNH) in 28% of patients 65 years of age or greater. Several risk factors for FNH are known, but their relationship to length of stay (LOS), an indicator of the total burden of FNH, is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a study to identify factors associated with the incidence, recurrence, and duration of hospitalizations for FN and to describe the frequency of administration of colony-stimulating factor (CSF) as primary and secondary prophylaxis and its association with repeated hospitalization episodes.

RESULTS

Compared with patients who did not experience hospitalizations for FN, those who did were significantly older, had more comorbid conditions, were planned for standard dose intensity, and received CSF less often during the first 5 days of cycle 1 (early CSF). Overall, 73% of these hospitalizations occurred within the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy, with 56% occurring within the first cycle. Patients age > or = 65 years accounted for 66% of cycle 1 FNH. Patients receiving early CSF were less likely to experience repeated hospitalizations (0% vs 12%; P<.05). Multiple regression analysis of those hospitalized found a 3.9-day longer LOS for patients age > or = 65 years and a 5.13-day longer LOS for those not receiving early CSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Older NHL patients have a higher risk of hospitalization for FN and longer LOS. The majority of hospitalization days occur in the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Early CSF use is associated with decreased risk of repeated hospitalizations and shorter total LOS. Secondary CSF use is also associated with reduced risk of repeated FNH.

Individualized chemotherapy for elderly patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

Approximately one third of all patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are over the age of seventy. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly because of impaired organ function and comorbidities. For this reason, these patients are often not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A multidimensional geriatric evaluation is important to plan appropriate treatments. At present, there are no indications for adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combined chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced disease increases toxicity and seems determine no survival advantage as compared with radiation therapy alone. In advanced disease, single-agent vinorelbine proves to be active and well-tolerated, and compared with best supportive care, improves survival and perhaps quality of life. Gemcitabine is active and also well tolerated. Taxanes are in advanced phase of evaluation. A phase III randomized trial showed that polychemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine does not improve any outcome as compared with single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. In clinical practice, single-agent chemotherapy should remain the standard treatment. The choice of the drug should be based on the toxicity profile of each drug and type of comorbid conditions. In the near future, new therapeutic strategies and biologic agents could improve present results.

Cancer surgery in the elderly

Surprisingly, cancer in the elderly is frequently treated in a poor manner, and the behaviour of the disease in elderly patients is often poorly understood. Cancer treatment varies significantly with age, the percentage of patients receiving definitive treatment declines with increasing age, and there is a decline in survival of cancer with age. One of the contributing factors may be that physicians are less likely to recommend specialist consultation for elderly patients. One has to keep in mind that cancer surgery in the elderly, without any co-morbidity, is safe, and that, nowadays, the morbidity and mortality increases minimally with the age of the patient. In contrast, the morbidity and mortality is 2-3 fold as high in the elderly cancer patients with co-morbidity compared with younger cancer patients. A better public education of the elderly may increase cancer awareness, and therefore decrease the risk of developing symptoms that require emergency surgery, with a subsequent three times increase in the mortality rate. Surgeons treating elderly cancer patients should realise that performance status is more important than age, and should always keep in mind the three major questions as recently formulated by Balducci; (1) is the patient going to die of cancer or with cancer, (2) is the patient able to tolerate the surgery and possible surgical-related complications, and (3) is the patient likely to suffer the complications of cancer during her/his life? The increased number of surgical treatment options in elderly cancer patients will lead to an increase in overall cancer survival in elderly cancer patients, and contribute to an improvement in their quality of life. Surgical oncologists should focus on how to manage the most common cancers in elderly people such as breast, colorectal, lung and prostate, as well as take an active part in palliative treatments.

Changed trends of cancer mortality in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Trends in cancer mortality for the elderly have long been unfavourable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mortality from 12 major cancer sites, plus total cancer mortality at age 65-84 in 23 European countries, the US and Japan was analyzed.

RESULTS

Between the late 1980s and the late 1990s total cancer mortality at age 65 to 84 has been declining in the European Union (UE) (-5.5% in males, -4.5% in females), in United States (US) males (-2.3%), but not females (+4.4%), and in Japanese females (-5.6%), but not males (+6.3%). Cancer mortality in the elderly rose for both sexes in eastern Europe. Gastric cancer mortality declined in all the areas. Lung cancer rates declined over the last decade by 8.5% in males in the EU. and by 0.9% in the US. Rates were still increasing in eastern Europe, in Japanese males and in females in all areas. Pancreatic mortality rates were increasing in both sexes in the EU and Japan up to the late 1980s, and in eastern Europe up to the 1990s, whereas rates for US males have been declining over recent years. Breast cancer mortality has declined over the last decade by 8% in the US and by 3% in the EU, while it has risen in eastern Europe and in Japan. Mortality from breast and prostate as well as ovarian cancer remained however low in elderly Japanese. Prostate cancer mortality declined in the EU and in the US, whereas it rose in eastern Europe and in Japan. Mortality from lymphomas and multiple myeloma rose in both sexes and various geographic areas, but improved diagnosis and certification may have played a role in these trends. Mortality from leukemia in the elderly increased in eastern Europe and Japan. but was stable in the US and the EU.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer mortality in the elderly has stopped systematically rising, and is on the decline in males since the late 1980s.