Adjuvant combination chemotherapy (AMF) following radical resection of carcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater--results of a controlled, prospective, randomised multicentre study

Gastrointestinal cancer: recent developments in medical oncology

BACKGROUND

Progress in the medical oncological treatment of gastrointestinal cancer has resulted from advances in tumour biology as well as randomised clinical trials. This review updates oncologists on developments in perioperative therapy for gastrointestinal tumours, optimal use of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, and novel targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

METHODS

The recent literature, including published abstracts, was reviewed with respect to current and developing treatments for gastrointestinal cancers. Emphasis was given to randomised clinical trials published within the last 5 years.

RESULTS

Randomised evidence exists to support the use of pre-operative chemotherapy in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer and pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer. There is preliminary randomised evidence to support the use of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer has been shown to improve survival. Improved disease-free survival for colorectal cancer patients treated with either adjuvant capecitabine or oxaliplatin has been demonstrated. MAbs targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary strategies for patients with localised gastrointestinal cancers; and improved systemic therapies for patients with advanced disease are leading to superior patient outcomes. Further improvements are required, and targeted agents may contribute to future progress.

[Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the era of evidence based medicine]

The aim of this comprehensive literature review was to analyse evidence based data in the field of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pylorus preserving does reduce mortality or morbidity of the standard procedure and could increase the risk of delayed gastric emptying. Pancreaticogastrostomy does not decrease the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula and is not superior to the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis which is more physiological. No other procedure (chemical occlusion, octreotide, stenting) has been demonstrated to prevent pancreatic fistula. Octreotide injection could be advocated in centres where there is a high rate of pancreatic fistula, when pancreatic parenchyma is soft and the main pancreatic duct thin. Intra-abdominal drainage is not beneficial and could be associated with some morbidity. Its use needs to be further evaluated. When a resection is done for pancreatic cancer, less than 5% of patients are a live five years after surgery with postoperative mortality rate of 5% in expert centres and a high morbidity rate (25-50%). Extended lymphadenectomy does not increase survival. The first trials showed that adjuvant therapies could be beneficial for pancreatic cancers, but further trials did not confirm these findings. Adjuvant therapy is not validated for pancreatic cancers and needs to be considered only in the settings of clinical trials.

Cancer in the elderly: pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a devastating and difficult disease to diagnose and successfully treat. Its incidence increases with age, with 60% of patients being over the age of 65 at presentation. Due to the insidious nature and asymptomatic onset of pancreatic cancer approximately 85% of patients present with disseminated or locally advanced disease resulting in a very poor prognosis. In the past the elderly patient, who may be felt to be too frail for operative procedures or further therapy, may have missed out on optimal treatment. In this article we review the investigation and treatment of pancreatic cancer and examine current evidence with regard to pancreatic cancer in the elderly. The evidence suggests that surgical resection can be performed safely in patients who are fit for surgery in specialist centres but may require more intensive post-operative rehabilitation.

Combined modality adjuvant therapy for resected periampullary pancreatic and nonpancreatic adenocarcinoma: a review of studies and experience at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1991-2003

In 1991 a multidisciplinary group consisting of surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, research nurses, and laboratory scientists was organized at the Johns Hopkins Hospital to accelerate progress in understanding the clinical and basic biology of pancreatic carcinoma and to develop research protocols aimed at improving clinical outcomes. This article discusses the studies, data, and conclusions generated to date, in some cases preliminarily, for the clinical trials and algorithms the Johns Hopkins team applied to the postoperative adjuvant management of periampullary pancreatic and nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinomas during the interval 1991 to 2003.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: current status and future directions

This article summarizes the important past and ongoing adjuvant therapy trials for pancreatic cancer. The recent developments in the fields of radiosensitization, chemotherapy, and molecular-targeted therapy are outlined. Finally, the future study strategies for adjuvant therapy trials are discussed.

The evolution of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for advanced pancreatic cancer: from 5-fluorouracil to GTX

This article reviews the relevant literature and reports on The Columbia University Medical Center experience with chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer.

Conclusions from the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer adjuvant trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most difficult cancers to treat. It is a tumor that tends to present late, and surgical resection is only possible in a minority of patients. After successful surgery, the prognosis is still relatively poor. Attempts at more radical pancreatic resections and extended lymphadenectomy, although feasible without excessive morbidity and mortality, have failed to produce any convincing improvement in survival. During the last few years, therefore, efforts have been directed toward the development of adjuvant therapies in an attempt to improve outcome. This article describes the main trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy with follow-on chemotherapy and presents the results of the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) 1 trial and the status of the ESPAC 2 and 3 trials.

Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer

Background

Pancreatic cancer carries a dismal prognosis but there has been a vast increase in evidence on its management in the past decade.

Methods

An electronic and manual search was performed for articles on the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer published in the past 10 years.

Results

Six major areas of advancement were identified. Groups at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer, notably those with chronic pancreatitis and hereditary pancreatitis, have been defined, raising the need for secondary screening. Methods of staging pancreatic cancer for resection have greatly improved but accuracy is still only 85–90 per cent. Pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy without extended lymphadenectomy is the simplest procedure; it does not compromise long-term survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves long-term survival. Patients who are free from major co-morbidity have better palliation by surgery (with a double bypass) than by endoscopy. High-volume centres improve the results of surgery for all outcome measures including long-term survival.

Conclusion

The surgical management of pancreatic cancer has undergone a significant change in the past decade. It has moved away from no active treatment. The standard of care can now be defined as potentially curative resection in a specialist centre followed by adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.

The Virginia Mason approach to localized pancreatic cancer

This article describes the approaches presently employed at Virginia Mason Medical Center for treatment of localized pancreatic cancer, including preoperative staging, operative intervention, incorporation of adjuvant therapy, and supportive care.

Advances in the Genetic Screening, Work-up, and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Familiarity with the updated results in genetic screening and work-up presented here is essential to early diagnosis and possible cure. In the metastatic setting, we most frequently begin with the GTX regimen, consisting of Gemcitabine, Taxotere, and Xeloda. The regimen is based on our laboratory data demonstrating a synergistic increase in cell killing of pancreatic cancer cell lines. The combination takes advantage of the selective cell cycle effects of each of the three drugs. In our initial experience, we have seen a response rate of 40% at metastatic sites and 31% at the primary site after nine cycles of GTX. We are now conducting a formal phase II protocol to confirm these results. The median survival of this group of patients (at least 10.4 months) is as long as, or longer than other currently used regimens. In those patients who do not tolerate GTX or progress despite the regimen, we have found that a regimen of the same three drugs, administered on a different schedule, can produce responses. In the neoadjuvant (unresectable) setting, we treat with GTX initially and then follow with radiation; gemcitabine is used as a radiosensitizer during this treatment. An aggressive surgical approach with a team of surgeons were able to resect for cure 12 of the 16 patients who were initially unresectable; one year survival of these 12 was 100%; 2 year survival was 50%. Future work in this disease should focus on targeted agents such as bevacizumab.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: an evolving paradigm

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in men and fifth in women in the United States. The median survival is 8 to 12 months for patients with locally advanced and unresectable disease and only 3 to 6 months for those with metastatic disease at presentation. Surgical resection offers the only potentially curative treatment. However, only 15% to 20% of patients present with tumors amenable to resection at initial diagnosis. Even for those who undergo resection, the prognosis remains poor. The 5-year survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy is only about 25% to 30% for node-negative tumors and 10% for node-positive tumors. Because of the dismal outcome for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, adjuvant therapy has been administered in an attempt to improve the local control and overall survival. This review highlights historic and current perspectives of adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer.

Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist?

Surgery for pancreatic cancer offers a low success rate but it provides the only likelihood of cure. Modern series show that, in experienced hands, the standard Whipple procedure is associated with a 5-year survival of 10%-20%, with a perioperative mortality rate of less than 5%. Most patients, however, will develop recurrent disease within 2 years after curative treatment. This occurs, usually, either at the site of resection or in the liver. This suggests the presence of micrometastases at the time of operation. Negative lymph nodes are the strongest predictor for long-term survival. Other predictors for a favourable outcome are tumour size, radical surgery and a histopathologically well-differentiated tumour. Adjuvant therapy has, so far, shown only modest results, with 5FU chemotherapy, to date, the only proven agent able to increase survival. Nowadays, the choice of therapy should be based on histopathological assessment of the tumour. Knowledge of the molecular basis of pancreatic cancer has led to various discoveries concerning its character and type. Well-known examples of genetic mutations in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are k-ras, p53, p16, DPC4. Use of molecular diagnostics and markers in the assessment of tumour biology may, in future, reveal important subtypes of this type of tumour and may possibly predict the response to adjuvant therapy. Defining the subtypes of pancreatic cancer will, hopefully, lead to target-specific, less toxic and finally more effective therapies. Long-term survival is observed in only a very small group of patients, contradicting the published actuarial survival rates of 10%-45%. Assessment of clinical benefit from surgery and adjuvant therapy should, therefore, not only be based on actuarial survival but also on progression-free survival, actual survival, median survival and quality of life (QOL) indicators. Survival in surgical series is usually calculated by actuarial methods. If there is no information on the total number of patients and the number of actual survivors, and no clear definition of the subset of patients, actuarial survival curves can prove to be misleading. Proper assessment of QOL after surgery and adjuvant therapy is of the utmost importance, as improvements in survival rates have, so far, proved to be disappointing.

Survival efficacy of adjuvant cytosine-analogue CS-682 in a fluorescent orthotopic model of human pancreatic cancer

Adjuvant treatment with the cytosine analogue 1-(2-C-cyano-2-deoxy-beta-D-arabino-pentofuranosyl)-N(4)-palmitoylcytosine (CS-682) results in a highly significant increase in survival in the aggressive orthotopic MIA-PaCa-2 human pancreatic cancer mouse model. Seven days after implantation, mice were randomized into eight groups, depending on whether they were to be treated by tumor resection, 5 weeks of CS-682 chemotherapy at 40-60 mg/kg once daily, or both. Throughout the course of treatment, noninvasive optical whole-body imaging based on brilliant red fluorescent protein expression of the tumor permitted visualization and quantification of primary, metastatic, and recurrent disease. Total tumor burden negatively correlated with survival. Untreated mice died of disseminated disease with a median survival of 26 days. Surgical resection alone conferred a small but significant survival advantage (median survival, 28 days, P = 0.03). Primary CS-682 treatment at all doses also significantly prolonged survival compared with untreated animals (P < 0.05) and was more effective than surgery alone at doses of 50 and 60 mg/kg (median survival, 34 days, P = 0.045, and 38.5 days, P = 0.03, respectively). Maximal survival (median, 48 days, with 30% of animals surviving longer than 60 days) was achieved by adjuvant CS-682 (50 mg/kg), given after surgical resection of the primary pancreatic tumor (P = 0.004 compared with surgery alone). The results demonstrate that adjuvant oral administration of CS-682 for pancreatic cancer is highly effective with acceptable toxicity, suggesting its potential for cure of this disease in appropriate combinations.

Postoperative adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

The majority of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer present at an advanced stage, and only a small percentage are considered technically resectable at diagnosis. The overall prognosis for the majority is dismal, with a median survival in untreated cases of only 24 weeks. Even in resected patients the overall 5-year survival rate is generally only 5% to 10%; however, some reports indicate higher 5-year survival rates in patients treated with surgery who are pathologically staged with no lymph node involvement. Even when macroscopically complete resection is achieved, local recurrence (LR) rates are unacceptably high (30% to 70%), which is usually attributed to the difficulty of obtaining microscopically free surgical margins. Microscopic clearance is difficult to achieve because these tumors frequently extend into the peripancreatic tissues (e.g., retropancreatic fat), abut or invade the adjacent large vessels (the portal vein and superior mesenteric artery), and have a propensity to invade the lymphovascular and perineural space. Other common sites of failure after attempted curative resection include metastasis to the liver and the peritoneal cavity. Patients who present with pancreatic cancer, and for whom curative surgery is deemed possible, are thus potential candidates for adjuvant therapy because of the high local failure rate following resection alone. The radiotherapy dose that can be achieved in the postoperative setting for pancreatic cancer is limited because of the proximity of critical structures (e.g., the kidney, liver, small intestines, stomach, and spinal cord). Newer techniques such as conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy have the advantage of being able (theoretically) to precisely localize the dose to the target volume while reducing the dose to critical structures. These techniques may potentially enable the tumorcidal dose to be increased; however, they are only now becoming widespread. Systemic radiation-sensitizing chemotherapy is also a promising approach to take advantage of additive or synergistic effects with radiation locally, and for the sterilization of systemic disease. This concept of concomitant chemotherapy with radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy, has proved effective in a number of sites, including the anal canal, rectum, lung, and pancreas. The recent trials reviewed here varied considerably in terms of the total dose and technique used, and the choice of radiation sensitizing treatment.

A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The effect of adjuvant treatment on survival in pancreatic cancer is unclear. We report the final results of the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 1 Trial and update the interim results.

METHODS

In a multicenter trial using a two-by-two factorial design, we randomly assigned 73 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to treatment with chemoradiotherapy alone (20 Gy over a two-week period plus fluorouracil), 75 patients to chemotherapy alone (fluorouracil), 72 patients to both chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy, and 69 patients to observation.

RESULTS

The analysis was based on 237 deaths among the 289 patients (82 percent) and a median follow-up of 47 months (interquartile range, 33 to 62). The estimated five-year survival rate was 10 percent among patients assigned to receive chemoradiotherapy and 20 percent among patients who did not receive chemoradiotherapy (P=0.05). The five-year survival rate was 21 percent among patients who received chemotherapy and 8 percent among patients who did not receive chemotherapy (P=0.009). The benefit of chemotherapy persisted after adjustment for major prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant survival benefit in patients with resected pancreatic cancer, whereas adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has a deleterious effect on survival.

Old and new drugs in systemic therapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pancreatic cancer nearly equals its death rate (97%). Two-year survival is about 10%. Chemotherapy treatment is problematic because of the palliative and limited duration of response.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The article analyzes the objective response and median survival time (MST) for old and new drugs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

The most encouraging results to date come from studies of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as an adjuvant therapy and of gemcitabine in the advanced disease, which is one of the most active and best tolerated drugs in recent years. However, with the introduction of new drugs or with different old drug associations, interesting results are also becoming evident.

CONCLUSIONS

New approaches to CT treatment are necessary. Patient enrollment into rigorous and well conducted clinical trials, either at tumor diagnosis or after tumor recurrence, will generate new information regarding investigational therapies and it will offer improved therapies for patients with this disease.

Review article: chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a common, highly lethal disease that is rising in incidence. Chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to prolong survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine improves major symptoms and survival outcomes compared with bolus 5-FU. Many novel small molecules are being widely and actively researched. These compounds are based on classical mechanisms of action as well as biological therapies targeting novel cellular survival pathways, and include fluoropyrimidines, nucleoside cytidine analogues, platinum analogues, topoisomerase-inhibitors, antimicrotubule agents, proteasome inhibitors, vitamin D analogues, arachidonic acid pathway inhibitors, histone deacytylator inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor therapies. Adjuvant chemotherapy has also demonstrated the best survival outcomes following resection compared to other adjuvant or neo-adjuvant strategies such as radiation-based treatments. These benefits are superimposed on the dramatic increase in resectability rates and reduction in post-operative mortality achieved by centralisation of treatment in high-volume speciality centres. Newer 'small-molecule' drugs as well as the latest 'large-molecule' biological agents hold considerable promise for the future. Real advances are anticipated over the next five years but are dependent on large randomised controlled trials for success.

[Chemoradiation in pancreatic carcinoma]

Prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma remains poor, with one-year and five-year overall survival rates of 20 and 5% respectively. Only 5 to 15% of patients present with tumors amenable to resection. Long-term (5 years) survival after curative resection is less than 20%, and the median survival is about 12 months. This paper updates recent trends about concomitant chemoradiation. At first, a review of the studies on adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery is proposed. Then, indications of preoperative chemoradiation for patients with localized resectable adenocarcinoma are discussed. The last part concerns the most important and recent studies about chemoradiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer, either with 5-fluoro-uracile or based on new drugs like gemcitabine.

Should adjuvant therapy remain the standard of care for patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas?

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas continues to be a formidable disease. In the United States, patients who have had resected disease are generally offered adjuvant chemoradiation. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines uniformly support this practice. We reviewed seven selected series to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapy for patients who had resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Current evidence-based analysis demonstrates that an adjuvant therapy regimen as a standard of care is lacking. We, therefore, believe that it should be used judiciously because its benefit is confined to only a fraction of patients treated by complete resection (R0); patients with residual microscopic disease (R1) derived negligible benefits. Given the financial constraints and the small effect that current therapies have on this fatal disease, clinicians should concentrate on developing novel therapies and new paradigms to address this age-old problem.

An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Randomized prospective trials have addressed various treatment approaches to pancreatic adenocarcinoma in order to improve on the dismal prognosis associated with this disease. We conducted a comprehensive review of prospective randomized clinical trials and summarized the contemporary treatment of resectable pancreatic carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature search strategy identified prospective randomized clinical trials for pancreatic carcinoma using standard medical subject heading terms. The articles were critically reviewed and ranked according to a standardized three-tiered system (Ia, Ib, Ic) by a panel of experts.

RESULTS

Surgical studies have demonstrated that morbidity and mortality are similar for pylorus-preserving and classic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy can be performed with similar mortality but increased morbidity compared with standard pancreaticoduodenectomy but does not prolong survival. Pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy appear to be comparable techniques for pancreatic duct reconstruction. Pancreatic-enteric anastomosis is associated with lower rates of pancreatic fistula and endocrine insufficiency than duct occlusion without anastomosis. Intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection is unwarranted and may contribute to intraabdominal complications. Routine use of prophylactic octreotide does not lower the rate of pancreatic fistula; it should be considered for reoperative pancreatic resection or for a soft gland. Early trials found that adjuvant chemoradiation therapy prolongs survival. But in more recent studies chemoradiation after resection has failed to show a survival advantage over surgery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. There is no clear indication as to a single preferable resection approach.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: historical and current perspectives

The results from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear to be improving with increased resection rates and reduced postoperative mortality reported by specialist pancreatic cancer teams. Developments with medical oncological treatments have been difficult, however, due to the fundamentally aggressive biological nature of pancreatic cancer and its resistance to chemotherapy coupled with a relative dearth of randomised controlled trials. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-1 trial recruited nearly 600 patients and is the largest trial in pancreatic cancer. The results demonstrated that the current best adjuvant treatment is chemotherapy using bolus 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid. The median survival of patients randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy was 15.5 months and is comparable with many other studies, but the median survival in the chemotherapy arm was 19.7 months and is as good or superior to multimodality treatments including intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies. The use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid may be supplanted by gemcitabine but requires confirmation by ongoing clinical trials, notably ESPAC-3, which plans to recruit 990 patients from Europe, Canada and Australasia. Major trials such as ESPAC-1 and ESPAC-3 have set new standards for the development of adjuvant treatment and it is now clear that such treatment in this field has the potential to significantly improve both patient survival and quality of life after curative resection.

Resection for pancreatic cancer in the new millennium

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Complications of pancreatic resections are dangerous and costly. A literature review was therefore done to investigate the evidence for improving the results by regionalizing this demanding surgery.

RESULTS

Studies from four countries (USA, UK, the Netherlands and Finland) with advanced health care systems have shown a significant inverse correlation between case volume for pancreatic cancer resection and post-operative mortality. Further analysis reveals lower complications, reduced hospital stay, reduced hospital costs and improved survival of patients treated in high-volume hospitals. The relationship volume and outcome is with institutional volume rather than single surgeon caseload. The evidence therefore strongly supports the regionalization of pancreatic cancer surgery into large specialized multi-disciplinary units. In the UK, the National Health Service Executive has instructed Regional Health Authorities to concentrate pancreatic cancer surgery into designated Regional Centres ideally with catchment populations of 2-4 million. There is now considerable pressure to adopt a similar policy in all countries with advanced health care systems.

CONCLUSION

There is today enough evidence to advocate the regionalization of pancreatic cancer resections.

Is postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy useful for gallbladder carcinoma? A phase III multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge, the significance of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreaticobiliary carcinoma has not yet been clarified. A randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy with mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (MF arm) versus surgery alone (control arm) on survival and disease-free survival (DFS) for each specific disease comprising resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma (pancreatic, gallbladder, bile duct, or ampulla of Vater carcinoma) separately.

METHODS

Between April 1986 and June 1992, a total of 508 patients with resected pancreatic (n = 173), bile duct (n = 139), gallbladder (n = 140), or ampulla of Vater (n = 56) carcinomas were allocated randomly to either the MF group or the control group. The MF group received MMC (6 mg/m(2) intravenously [i.v.]) at the time of surgery and 5-FU (310 mg/m(2) i.v.) in 2 courses of treatment for 5 consecutive days during postoperative Weeks 1 and 3, followed by 5-FU (100 mg/m(2)orally) daily from postoperative Week 5 until disease recurrence. All patients were followed for 5 years.

RESULTS

After ineligible patients were excluded, 158 patients with pancreatic carcinoma (81 in the MF group and 77 in the control group), 118 patients with bile duct carcinoma (58 in the MF group and 60 in the control group), 112 patients with gallbladder carcinoma (69 in the MF group and 43 in the control group), and 48 patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (24 in the MF group and 24 in the control group) were evaluated. Good compliance (> 80%) was achieved with MF treatment. The 5-year survival rate in gallbladder carcinoma patients was significantly better in the MF group (26.0%) compared with the control group (14.4%) (P = 0.0367). Similarly, the 5-year DFS rate of patients with gallbladder carcinoma was 20.3% in the MF group, which was significantly higher than the 11.6% DFS rate reported in the control group (P = 0.0210). Significant improvement in body weight compared with the control was observed only in patients with gallbladder carcinoma. There were no apparent differences in 5-year survival and 5-year DFS rates between patients with pancreatic, bile duct, or ampulla of Vater carcinomas. Multivariate analyses demonstrated a tendency for the MF group to have a lower risk of mortality (risk ratio of 0.654; P = 0.0825) and recurrence (risk ratio of 0.626; P = 0.0589). The most commonly reported adverse drug reactions were anorexia, nausea/emesis, stomatitis, and leukopenia, none of which were noted to be serious.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that gallbladder carcinoma patients who undergo noncurative resections may derive some benefit from systemic chemotherapy. However, alternative modalities must be developed for patients with carcinomas of the pancreas, bile duct, or ampulla of Vater.

Adjuvant radiotherapy in resectable pancreatic carcinoma

AIM

Pancreatic cancer is a near fatal disease. External beam radiotherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been proposed with the aim to improve clinical outcome in resectable tumors. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and outcome in patients with cT1-3 pancreatic cancer, treated with surgery, external beam radiotherapy and IORT.

METHODS

From 1990 to 1996, 17 patients with clinical stage T1-3N0-1M0 adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas were treated with pancreatectomy and pre- (nine patients: 5 Gy), intra- (all patients: 10 Gy) and post-operative (all patients: 50 Gy) radiotherapy. The pathologic T stages were: 4 pT2 and 13 pT3. The pathologic N stages were: 9 pN0 and 8 pN1. Minimum follow-up in living patients was 60 months.

RESULTS

No perioperative mortalities were recorded. Two patients showed postoperative morbidity (11.8%) which required a subsequent laparotomy. The disease-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 41, 23 and 18%, respectively (median: 9 months). The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 70%, 41% and 18%, respectively (median: 17.5 months). Three patients developed local failure (17.6%) and 12 patients showed distant metastases (70.6%). Univariate analysis (logrank) showed: a significant correlation between both N-stage and retroperitoneal involvement (RPI) with local control (N-stage: P=0.0155; RPI:P =0.0295), a significant correlation between maximum tumor size and metastases-free survival (P=0.0167) and overall survival (P=0.0241); the female gender was another predictor of prolonged survival (P= 0.0465). Multivariate analysis (Cox) showed a significant impact of N-stage and retroperitoneal involvement on local control and also a significant correlation between perineural involvement and tumor diameter with metastases-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are similar to those of other published series and suggest that this approach is feasible with acceptable local control and survival, especially in patients with small tumors (<2.5 cm: 5 year survival=33.3%) and in female patients (5 year survival=30%). Due to the impact of gender, tumor diameter and N stage on prognosis, in the design of future trials a stratification of patients based on these categories should be considered. The search of effective chemotherapeutic agents is required, to reduce the high incidence of distant metastases, especially in larger tumors.

Surgical and medical therapy for pancreatic carcinoma

Progress on the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has involved advances in medical and surgical care with important contributions from disciplines such as radiology and intensive care. In the last decade large randomized controlled trials have been undertaken that demonstrate the improved patient outcomes. There is an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis, hereditary pancreatitis and a variety of familial cancer syndromes. The optimum outcome from pancreatic cancer needs management by multidisciplinary teams in regional specialist units. Endoscopic stenting, good pain relief and pancreatic enzyme supplementation are the basis of care in advanced pancreatic cancer. Chemotherapy prolongs survival in advanced pancreatic cancer with little to be gained using drugs other than 5FU. Resection, if possible, prolongs life and provides the best quality of life. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is of no benefit but chemotherapy may improve survival. Alongside the evolution in clinical management has been the elucidation of the molecular events that underlie pancreatic cancer and this knowledge has guided the introduction of targeted treatments for pancreatic cancer.

Update on pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the commonest causes of cancer death worldwide. Patients with pancreatic cancer benefit from resectional surgery (improved quality of life) and adjuvant treatment (enhanced survival). This review covers advances in the understanding of the development of pancreatic cancer, state-of-the-art clinical management and, finally, novel treatment and screening techniques.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies of pancreatic cancer: a review

The survival of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer is dismal. Few patients on initial presentation are suitable for surgical resection. This has prompted clinical studies with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy designed either to increase the number of patients eligible for surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) or to prolong the survival of patients who had undergone surgery (adjuvant therapy). None of these studies may at this time be considered definitive. Wherever possible, patients felt eligible for neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy should be entered on clinical trials. Where this is not possible, clinicians should exercise their best judgment in offering this type of treatment to pancreatic cancer patients under their care.

Randomized clinical trials in pancreatic cancer

The authors reviewed 59 prospective, randomized, controlled trials for pancreatic carcinoma that were published between 1977 and 2000. Of the 11 surgical trials, two each studied extent of resection (standard versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy) and lymphadenectomy (standard versus extended lymph node dissection), five trials compared different types of pancreaticenteric reconstruction, and one each evaluated the role of prophylactic gastrojejunostomy and chemical splanchnicectomy in the setting of advanced disease.

Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of resection margins on survival for patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated within the context of the adjuvant European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer-1 (ESPAC-1) study.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor long-term survival rate of only 10% to 15% after resection. Patients with positive microscopic resection margins (R1) have a worse survival, but it is not known how they fare in adjuvant studies.

METHODS

ESPAC-1, the largest randomized adjuvant study of resectable pancreatic cancer ever performed, set out to look at the roles of chemoradiation and chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified prospectively by resection margin status.

RESULTS

Of 541 patients with a median follow-up of 10 months, 101 (19%) had R1 resections. Resection margin status was confirmed as an influential prognostic factor, with a median survival of 10.9 months for R1 versus 16.9 months months for patients with R0 margins. Resection margin status remained an independent factor in a Cox proportional hazards model only in the absence of tumor grade and nodal status. There was a survival benefit for chemotherapy but not chemoradiation, irrespective of R0/R1 status. The median survival was 19.7 months with chemotherapy versus 14.0 months without. For patients with R0 margins, chemotherapy produced longer survival compared with to no chemotherapy. This difference was less apparent for the smaller subgroup of R1 patients, but there was no significant heterogeneity between the R0 and R1 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection margin-positive pancreatic tumors represent a biologically more aggressive cancer; these patients benefit from resection and adjuvant chemotherapy but not chemoradiation. The magnitude of benefit for chemotherapy treatment is reduced for patients with R1 margins versus those with R0 margins. Patients with R1 tumors should be included in future trials of adjuvant treatments and randomization and analysis should be stratified by this significant prognostic factor.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) assessed the roles of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in a randomised study.

METHODS

After resection, patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (20 Gy in ten daily fractions over 2 weeks with 500 mg/m(2) fluorouracil intravenously on days 1-3, repeated after 2 weeks) or chemotherapy (intravenous fluorouracil 425 mg/m(2) and folinic acid 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, monthly for 6 months). Clinicians could randomise patients into a two-by-two factorial design (observation, chemoradiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or both) or into one of the main treatment comparisons (chemoradiotherapy versus no chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was death, and all analyses were by intention to treat. Findings 541 eligible patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomised: 285 in the two-by-two factorial design (70 chemoradiotherapy, 74 chemotherapy, 72 both, 69 observation); a further 68 patients were randomly assigned chemoradiotherapy or no chemoradiotherapy and 188 chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the 227 (42%) patients still alive was 10 months (range 0-62). Overall results showed no benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (median survival 15.5 months in 175 patients with chemoradiotherapy vs 16.1 months in 178 patients without; hazard ratio 1.18 [95% CI 0.90-1.55], p=0.24). There was evidence of a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (median survival 19.7 months in 238 patients with chemotherapy vs 14.0 months in 235 patients without; hazard ratio 0.66 [0.52-0.83], p=0.0005). Interpretation This study showed no survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy but revealed a potential benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy, justifying further randomised controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

The outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer has been grim. There have been major advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, leading to a dramatic reduction in post-operative mortality from the development of high volume specialized centres. This stimulated the study of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in pancreatic cancer including chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Initial protocols have been based on the original but rather small GITSG study first reported in 1985. There have been two large European trials totalling over 600 patients (EORTC and ESPAC-1) that do not support the use of chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy. A second major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial (541 patients randomized) was some but not conclusive evidence for a survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. A third major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial was that the quality of life was not affected by the use of adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone. The ESPAC-3 trial aims to assess the definitive use of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial of 990 patients.

New directions in systemic therapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The aggressiveness of pancreatic adenocarcinoma makes it a deadly disease, with its incidence rate and fatality rate almost equal. Surgery represents the only means to provide cure to patients with pancreatic cancer, though the 5-year survival is less than 10%.

METHODS

We review the data on surgical and systemic therapies and provide more details on a newer biologically based medical approach.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols are confined to one or two institutions, and adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy protocols are far from being standardized. Chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer offers limited benefits. Protocols that include gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil, while comparing favorably to historical controls, offer median survivals at approximately 8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

More effective protocols with combinations of approaches agents are needed to improve the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Novel non-operative treatment and treatment strategies in pancreatic cancer

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have traditionally been treated with palliative care only. The last decade has seen significant improvements in the surgical treatment of this disease but until the late 1990s there was no effective non-surgical treatment for these tumours. The introduction of gemcitabine has given clinicians treating patients with pancreatic cancer a new option. The published randomised data of gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer has shown both a small survival advantage and significant improvements in quality of life indicators in these patients. These data have stimulated a resurgence of interest in pancreatic tumours and several studies have been or are currently investigating novel treatments or treatment strategies. The explosion in the molecular knowledge of cancer has led to the development of several 'molecular designer drugs' that have been tested in pancreatic cancer. The furthest advanced of these is a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor called marimastat. The first randomised data using this new class of agents is increasing and suggests that marimastat may have a role in the future treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. Other agents such as gastrimmune, are about to enter Phase III studies and several other molecular treatment strategies are progressing from the in vitro stage towards the clinical arena. Each of these treatments and treatment regimens are discussed along with their current progress.

[Concomitant chemoradiotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy in exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinoma]

The prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate lower than 5%. Resection, the gold standard treatment, can be performed in less than 10% of patients. Following surgery, the median survival is 12 months. Concomitant chemoradiation, as an adjuvant treatment could be superior to surgery alone, in terms of survival; controlled trials are currently performed. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a new approach, potentially able to increase survival and resection rate. Finally, current data regarding intraoperative irradiation are exposed.

Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group

OBJECTIVE

The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil versus observation alone after surgery was investigated in patients with pancreatic head and periampullary cancers.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A previous study of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in these cancers by the Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group of EORTC has been followed by other studies with conflicting results.

METHODS

Eligible patients with T1-2N0-1aM0 pancreatic head or T1-3N0-1aM0 periampullary cancer and histologically proven adenocarcinoma were randomized after resection.

RESULTS

Between 1987 and 1995, 218 patients were randomized (108 patients in the observation group, 110 patients in the treatment group). Eleven patients were ineligible (five in the observation group and six in the treatment group). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. One hundred fourteen patients (55%) had pancreatic cancer (54 in the observation group and 60 in the treatment group). In the treatment arm, 21 patients (20%) received no treatment because of postoperative complications or patient refusal. In the treatment group, only minor toxicity was observed. The median duration of survival was 19.0 months for the observation group and 24.5 months in the treatment group (log-rank, p = 0.208). The 2-year survival estimates were 41% and 51 %, respectively. The results when stratifying for tumor location showed a 2-year survival rate of 26% in the observation group and 34% in the treatment group (log-rank, p = 0.099) in pancreatic head cancer; in periampullary cancer, the 2-year survival rate was 63% in the observation group and 67% in the treatment group (log-rank, p = 0.737). No reduction of locoregional recurrence rates was apparent in the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant radiotherapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil is safe and well tolerated. However, the benefit in this study was small; routine use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not warranted as standard treatment in cancer of the head of the pancreas or periampullary region.

[Therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in the areas of epidemiology, risk factors, molecular genetics and diagnosis pancreatic carcinoma is characterized by a dismal prognosis and ranks 5th among malignancy-associated deaths. This article attempts to critically review the current literature and analyze therapeutic recommendations based on published evidence. Therapeutic options are based on the stage of the disease.

SURGICAL TREATMENT

Surgical resection with curative intention is feasible only in a minority of patients presenting with locally confined tumor disease. RADIO- AND CHEMOTHERAPY: Adjuvant combined radiochemotherapy might potentially improve survival and can also be considered in unresectable, locally advanced disease. The role of chemotherapy in advanced disease is exclusively palliative. Up to now, no chemotherapeutic regimen has demonstrated convincing impact on survival. Newer substances, such as gemcitabine, appear to be of some value in respect to quality of life. Best supportive care oriented at clinical symptoms remains a cornerstone in the therapeutic concept of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Development of innovative therapeutic strategies is therefore mandatory.

Treatment of cancer of the exocrine pancreas

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cancer of the exocrine pancreas varies among populations, being the fourth or fifth cause of cancer death in the West. Outcome remains poor and opinions remain divided over the optimal management of the condition.

METHOD

A computer literature search was made of the MEDLINE database from January 1990 to December 1997 and selected other studies.

RESULTS

Indications and contraindications for surgery, indications for stenting, indications for resection, the technique of palliative procedures and of resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined treatments and other treatments are discussed and recommendations made.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of tumor size or spread, resection if feasible gives the best survival rates. Careful patient selection is required, however, to exclude those patients for whom surgical resection has no benefit. Nonsurgical procedures including endoscopic stenting in patients with high operative risk or short survival expectancy can significantly improve quality of life. The place of adjuvant therapies remains controversial and further controlled trials are required to demonstrate their efficacy.

[Concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the therapeutic strategy of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas and stomach]

The prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate lower than 5%. Resection, the gold standard treatment, can be performed in less than 10% of patients. Following surgery, the median survival is 12 months for the most favorable cancer patients. Concomitant chemoradiation, as an adjuvant treatment is superior to surgery alone, in terms of survival; controlled trials are currently performed. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a new approach, potentially able to increase survival and resection rate. This work justifies the role of these schemes, in terms of modalities and potential advantages. A second part is dedicated to gastric carcinoma, with a review of the current results of chemoradiation, whose efficiency, even though a trend can be observed, remains to be proven. Prospective adjuvant combined treatments are ongoing, in France and in the States.

[Role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the therapeutic strategy of exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas]

The prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate lower than 5%. Resection, the gold standard treatment, can be performed in less than 10% of patients. Following surgery, the median survival is 12 months for the most favorable patients. Concomitant chemoradiation, as an adjuvant treatment is superior to surgery alone, in terms of survival, controlled trials are currently performed. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a new approach, potentially able to increase survival and resection rate. This work justifies the role of these schemes, in terms of modalities and potential advantages.