FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer

Phase I Trial of Upamostat Combined With Gemcitabine in Locally Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Assessment

AIM

This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) inhibitor upamostat (LH011) in combination with gemcitabine for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHOD

Seventeen patients were enrolled and received escalating doses of oral LH011 (100, 200, 400, or 600 mg) daily alongside 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine. Safety profiles, tumor response (including response rate and progression-free survival), pharmacokinetics, and changes in CA199 and D-dimer levels were assessed.

RESULTS

During the study period (Day0-Day49), no patients achieved partial response. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 12 patients (70.6%), while four patients (23.5%) experienced progressive disease (PD). One patient withdrew due to a serious adverse event (SAE) on D47. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a dose-related increase in LH011 and its metabolite WX-UK1 exposure from 100 to 400 mg but not in the 600 mg group. Hematological toxicity, mainly attributable to gemcitabine, was the predominant grade 3 or 4 adverse event, with additional occurrences of loss of appetite, rash, and interstitial lung disease. Sinus bradycardia possibly linked to LH011 rather than gemcitabine was noted. The MTD was not reached.

CONCLUSION

Combining LH011 at doses ranging from 100 to 600 mg with gemcitabine every 21 days demonstrated manageable safety and tolerability. However, tumor response did not significantly differ among the dose groups, suggesting the need for further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05329597.

Exploring external validity of chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in real life

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine (PAXG) regimen activity was assessed in a single institution phase II trial (PACT-19) on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The PACT-31 study explored the external validity of PACT-19 results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 and ≤75 years with KPS ≥70, and PDAC diagnosis receiving PAXG in the participating institutions were eligible and categorized as follows: A) PACT-19; B) PACT-31-HSR; C) PACT-31-non-HSR. With a sample of 175 patients, assuming a target 1-year overall survival of 60 % for metastatic and of 80 % for non-metastatic patients, the trial will be considered successful with the 1-year OS falling into the 95 % CI.

RESULTS

Data from 68 PACT-19 and 168 PACT-31 patients were retrieved. After 124 events, 1yOS was 52.5 % (95 %CI: 44.6-60.4 %) for metastatic and 80.5 % (95 %CI: 71.9-89.1 %) for non-metastatic patients. Survival overlapped between PACT-19 and PACT-31-HSR (median 17.6 and 17.4 months, p = 0.21) and was significantly shorter in PACT-31-non-HSR (median 11.3 months; p = 0.03). Differences of dose-intensity, use of maintenance therapy, and treatment after progression between PACT-31-HSR and non-HSR were evidenced.

DISCUSSION

PACT-19 results have external validity. The outcome difference between HSR and non-HSR centers endorses the need of creating a hub-and-spoke network aimed at sharing the expertise on rare-diseases.

Exosome applications for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: An update (Review)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a malignant neoplasm that typically manifests with subtle clinical manifestations in its early stages and frequently eludes diagnosis until the advanced phases of the disease. The limited therapeutic options available for PDAC significantly contribute to its high mortality rate, highlighting the urgent need for novel biomarkers capable of effectively identifying early clinical manifestations and facilitating precise diagnosis. The pivotal role of cellular exosomes in both the pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions for PDAC has been underscored. Furthermore, researchers have acknowledged the potential of exosomes as targeted drug carriers against regulatory cells in treating PDAC. The present article aims to provide a comprehensive review encompassing recent advancements in utilizing exosomes for elucidating mechanisms underlying disease development, patterns of metastasis, diagnostic techniques and treatment strategies associated with PDAC.

Neoadjuvant Treatment with Changes in Chemotherapy Regimens According to Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level for Resectable/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The response of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may contribute to outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of changes in NAT regimens based on CA19-9 level.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients with resectable/borderline resectable (R/BR)-PDAC undergoing NAT from 2008 to 2022. A CA19-9 level lower than 150 IU/mL after NAT was the criterion for resection. If the level did not decrease, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to satisfy the criterion. The patient cohort was divided into group A (satisfied criterion without changing chemotherapy), group B (did not receive chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion), group C (received chemotherapy change, satisfied the criterion), and group D (received chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 283 patients. After first-line chemotherapy, 112 (39.6%) patients did not satisfy the criterion (groups B [n = 64], C [n = 32], and D [n = 16]). Of the 283 patients, 48 (17%) received a chemotherapy change (groups C and D). The patients in groups C and D showed significantly better overall survival (OS, 35.9 months) than the group B patients (25.7 months) (P = 0.035). The OS of the group C patients (63.8 months) was similar to the OS of the group A patients (n = 171: 56.3 months; P = 0.430). Multivariate analysis of the patients in groups B, C, and D identified chemotherapy change as an independent prognostic factor for OS and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Changing the chemotherapy targeting the CA19-9 level can improve the outcome of R/BR-PDAC patients with poor biologic response to first-line NAT.

Taurine Synthesis by 2-Aminoethanethiol Dioxygenase as a Vulnerable Metabolic Alteration in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) exhibits an altered metabolic profile compared to normal pancreatic tissue. However, studies on actual pancreatic tissues are limited. Untargeted metabolomics analysis was conducted on 54 pairs of tumor and matched normal tissues. Taurine levels were validated via immunohistochemistry (IHC) on separate PDAC and normal tissues. Bioinformatics analysis of transcriptomics and proteomics data evaluated genes associated with taurine metabolism. Identified taurine-associated gene was validated through gene modulation. Clinical implications were evaluated using patient data. Metabolomics analysis showed a 2.51-fold increase in taurine in PDAC compared to normal tissues (n=54). IHC confirmed this in independent samples (n=99 PDAC, 19 normal). Bioinformatics identified 2-aminoethanethiol dioxygenase (ADO) as a key gene modulating taurine metabolism. IHC on a tissue microarray (39 PDAC, 10 normal) confirmed elevated ADO in PDAC. The ADO-Taurine axis correlated with PDAC recurrence and disease-free survival. ADO knockdown reduced cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. The MEK-related signaling pathway is suggested to be modulated by ADO-Taurine metabolism. Our multi-omics investigation revealed elevated taurine synthesis mediated by ADO upregulation in PDAC. The ADO-Taurine axis may serve as a biomarker for PDAC prognosis and a therapeutic target.

Validation of ZIP4 as a tumour-associated antigen for nanotargeting

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a highly aggressive and untreatable cancer. There is a need to develop a new PDAC-associated antigen-targeting drug delivery system to tackle this disease. We validated choosing ZIP4 as a putative target in PDAC theranostics. We developed a nanosystem composed of a fluorescent polystyrene core coated with gold nanoparticles onto which a ZIP4-specific polyclonal antibody is attached. The polystyrene core's fluorescence properties allow the nanosystem tracking by intravital imaging. We also developed two ZIP4-expressing cell lines by stably transfecting HEK293 and RWP1 cells with a ZIP4-coding plasmid that simultaneously provides cells with puromycin resistance. We studied the cell internalisation of the as-synthesised nanoparticles and demonstrated that ZIP4-expressing HEK293 and ZIP4-expressing RWP1 cells tended to take up more ZIP4-targeting nanoparticles. Moreover, we observed that ZIP4-targeting nanoparticles accumulated more in ZIP4-expressing HEK293 and RWP1 tumours when injected intravenously in a subcutaneous xenograft and an orthotopic in vivo model, respectively. Furthermore, the administration of these nanoparticles did not induce any significant systemic toxicity as determined by histological analysis of all organs. Altogether, these results provide the first evidence of the feasibility of using a ZIP4-targeting nanosystem further to design efficient therapeutic and diagnostic tools for PDAC.

Development and Validation of a Survival Prediction Model for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) face challenging treatment decisions following their diagnosis. We developed and validated a survival prognostication model using routinely available clinical information, patient-reported symptoms, performance status, and initial cancer-directed treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with PDAC from 2007 to 2020 using linked administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Patients were randomly selected for model development (75%) and validation (25%). Using the development cohort, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with backward stepwise variable selection was used to predict the probability of survival. Model performance was assessed on the validation cohort using the concordance index and calibration plots.

RESULTS

There were 17,450 patients (49% female) with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range 63-81) and a mean survival time of 9 months. In the derivation cohort, 1,469 patients (11%) had early stage, 4,202 (32%) had advanced stage disease, and 7,417 (57%) had unknown stage. The following factors were associated with an increased risk of death by more than 10%: tumor in the tail of the pancreas; advanced stage; hospitalization 3 months before diagnosis; congestive heart failure or dementia; low, moderate, or high pain score; moderate or high appetite score; high dyspnea and tiredness score; and a performance status score of 60-70 or lower. The calibration plot indicated good agreement with a C-index of 0.76.

DISCUSSION

This model accurately predicted one-year survival for PDAC using clinical factors, symptoms, and performance status. This model may foster shared decision making for patients and their providers.

The role of AMPK in pancreatic cancer: from carcinogenesis to treatment

Pancreatic cancer has doubled over the previous two decades. Routine therapies are becoming incredibly resistant and failing to compensate for the burden caused by this aggressive neoplasm. As genetic susceptibility has always been a highlighted concern for this disease, identifying the molecular pathways involved in the survival and function of pancreatic cancer cells provides insight into its variant etiologies, one of which is the role of AMPK. This regulating factor of cell metabolism is crucial in the homeostasis and growth of the cell. Herein, we review the possible role of AMPK in pancreatic cancer while considering its leading effects on glycolysis and autophagy. Then, we assess the probable therapeutic agents that have resulted from the suggested pathways. Studying the underlying genetic changes in pancreatic cancer provides a chance to detect and treat patients suffering from advanced stages of the disease, and those who have given up their hope on conventional therapies can gain an opportunity to combat this cancer.

Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan as Second-Line Therapy

IntroductionNanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is an established second-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We previously developed a prognostic model (CGMH nomogram) to predict overall survival (OS) in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy before the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV era. Herein, we aimed to validate the CGMH nomogram in a real-world cohort treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, the current standard second-line treatment for metastatic PDAC.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 148 patients with metastatic PDAC treated with second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was analyzed. Prognostic scores were assigned using the CGMH nomogram, with patients stratified into tertiles as good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups. Predictive performance was assessed using the concordance index (c-index) and calibration plots.ResultsOur cohort had a median OS of 6.1 months. Patients in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups had median OS of 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-10.7), 5.7 (95% CI, 5.3-6.3), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.8-5.2) months, respectively. Compared with the good group, intermediate and poor groups had hazard ratios of 1.99 (95% CI, 1.29-3.07, P = .002) and 3.18 (95% CI, 1.87-5.40, P < .001), respectively. The nomogram demonstrated strong predictive ability, with c-indices of 0.73 and 0.70 for 6- and 12-month OS predictions, respectively. Calibration plots displayed excellent agreement between predicted and observed survival.ConclusionThe CGMH nomogram reliably predicted survival outcomes in nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV-treated patients with metastatic PDAC, and validation supported its use in clinical decision-making and personalized treatment planning.

Optimal treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer having positive peritoneal cytology: A nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study supervised by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer (PaCa) having positive peritoneal cytology (PPC).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with PPC treated at 78 high-volume centers between January 2012 and December 2020. Prognoses after resection (S-group) and initiation of nonsurgical treatment (N-group) were compared. Prognostic factors for survival in both groups were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of conversion surgery (CS) in the N-group were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 568 enrolled patients were classified into an S-group (n = 445) or an N-group (n = 123). Median survival times (MSTs) were 19.0 months and 19.3 months, respectively, with no significant difference in prognosis (p = .845). The intervenable prognostic factors for survival were adjuvant treatment in the S-group (p < .001) and CS in the N-group (p < .001). Following CS, the MST was prolonged to 45.6 months, and peritoneal or liver recurrence decreased considerably. CS can be expected if PPC is diagnosed before neoadjuvant treatment and when combination treatment is initiated.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection may not be beneficial for improving survival when PPC is evident. Chemotherapy aiming for CS may be the optimal treatment for such patients.

Real-world clinical outcomes and economic burden of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review

AIMS

This systematic review summarizes real-world clinical outcomes and economic burden of first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX)/modified FFX (mFFX) and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GnP) in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the US.

METHODS

Embase and MEDLINE were searched for materials published since 2014; citations were reviewed in a two-step process. Included studies were qualitatively synthesized.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 2,528 citations; 29 were included (17 clinical studies/12 economic studies). In 9/17 clinical studies, median overall survival (mOS) ranged from 4.7 months to 11.4 months for FFX/mFFX, with the unweighted median of the estimates within this range being 9.2 months; for GnP mOS ranged from 3.6 to 9.8 months, and the unweighted median of the estimates was 6.9 months. In 8/17 studies, grade 3/4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were the most commonly reported adverse events. Across economic burden studies, total costs were similar between the 2 groups. Outpatient, supportive care, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor costs were higher for the FFX generic regimen, and chemotherapy costs were higher for the GnP branded regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world OS in FFX- and GnP-treated populations was shorter than that in clinical trials, and total costs of FFX and GnP were similar, but with differences in cost components.

The use of patient-derived xenografts and patient-derived organoids in the search for new therapeutic regimens for pancreatic carcinoma. A review

Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and xenografts (PDXs) are powerful tools for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer (PC) research. This study explores the complementary strengths of PDOs and PDXs in terms of practicality, genetic fidelity, cost, and labor considerations. Among other models like 2D cell cultures, spheroids, cancer-on-chip systems, cell line-derived xenografts (CDX), and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), PDOs and PDXs uniquely balance genetic fidelity and personalized medicine potential, offering distinct advantages over the simplicity of 2D cultures and the advanced, but often resource-intensive, GEMMs and cancer-on-chip systems. PDOs excel in high-throughput drug screening due to their ease of use, lower cost, and shorter experimental timelines. However, they lack a complete tumor microenvironment. Conversely, PDXs offer a more complex microenvironment that closely reflects patient tumors, potentially leading to more clinically relevant results. Despite limitations in size, number of specimens, and engraftment success, PDXs demonstrate significant concordance with patient responses to treatment, highlighting their value in personalized medicine. Both models exhibit significant genetic fidelity, making them suitable for drug sensitivity testing. The choice between PDOs and PDXs depends on the research focus, resource availability, and desired level of microenvironment complexity. PDOs are advantageous for high-throughput screening of a diverse array of potential therapeutic agents due to their relative ease of culture and scalability. PDXs, on the other hand, offer a more physiologically relevant model, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of drug efficacy and mechanisms of action.

Novel Pt (II) Complexes With Anticancer Activity Against Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive type of solid tumor that is becoming more common. cis-[PtCl2 (NH3)2] (in short cisplatin or CDDP) has been shown to be effective in treating various cancers, including PDAC. However, the development of resistance to chemotherapy drugs has created a need for the synthesis of new anticancer agents. Platinum-based drugs containing the bidentate ligand phenanthroline have been found to have strong antitumor activity due to their ability to cause DNA damage. In this study, we examined the ability of two Pt (II) cationic complexes, [Pt(η 1-C2H4OR) (DMSO) (phen)]+ (in short Pt-EtORSOphen; R = Me, 1; Et, 2), to inhibit the growth and spread of BxPC-3 PDAC cells, in comparison to CDDP. The length of the alkyl chain and its associated lipophilic properties did not affect the anticancer effects of complexes 1 and 2 in BxPC-3 cells. However, it did appear to influence the rapid loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨM), suggesting that these complexes could potentially be used as mitochondria-targeted lipophilic cations in anticancer therapy.

The polymeric fluoropyrimidine CF10 overcomes limitations of 5-FU in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells through increased replication stress

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease soon to become the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US. Beside surgery, current therapies have narrow clinical benefits with systemic toxicities. FOLFIRINOX is the current standard of care, one component of which is 5- Fluorouracil (5-FU), which causes serious gastrointestinal and hematopoietic toxicities and is vulnerable to resistance mechanisms. Recently, we have developed polymeric fluoropyrimidines (F10, CF10) which unlike 5-FU, are, in principle, completely converted to the thymidylate synthase inhibitory metabolite FdUMP, without generating appreciable levels of ribonucleotides that cause systemic toxicities while displaying much stronger anti-cancer activity. Here, we confirm the potency of CF10 and investigate enhancement of its efficacy through combination with inhibitors in vitro targeting replication stress, a hallmark of PDAC cells. CF10 is 308-times more potent as a single agent than 5-FU and was effective in the nM range in primary patient derived models. Further, we find that activity of CF10, but not 5-FU, is enhanced through combination with inhibitors of ATR and Wee1 that regulate the S and G2 DNA damage checkpoints and can be reversed by addition of dNTPs indicative of CF10 acting, at least in part, through inducing replication stress. Our results indicate CF10 has the potential to supersede the established benefit of 5-FU in PDAC treatment and indicate novel combination approaches that should be validated in vivo and may be beneficial in established regimens that include 5-FU.

EPLIN, a prospective oncogenic molecule with contribution to growth, migration and drug resistance in pancreatic cancer

Most pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, with poor survival rates and drug resistance making pancreatic cancer one of the highest causes of cancer death in the UK. Understanding the underlying mechanism behind its carcinogenesis, metastasis and drug resistance has become an essential task for researchers. We have discovered that a well-established tumour suppressor, EPLIN, has an oncogenic rather than suppressive role in pancreatic cancer. Notably, upregulation of EPLIN was observed in pancreatic cancer samples compared to normal samples at RNA and protein levels. Moreover, the presence of EPLIN resulted in poor clinical outcomes in patients. We also report that inhibition of EPLIN led to reduced cellular growth and migration in pancreatic cancer cells. EPLIN regulates expression and phosphorylation levels of several key players in MAPK and PIK3CA-AKT signalling pathways, as well as key contributors of EMT. Furthermore, EPLIN mediates the inhibitory ability PIK3 kinases, MEK and ERK inhibitors have on cell migration. EPLIN was also found to have an impact on pancreatic cancer cells response to chemotherapeutic and EGFR/HER2 targeted therapeutic agents, namely gemcitabine, fluorouracil (5FU) and neratinib (Nerlynx).

BRCA and Beyond: Impact on Therapeutic Choices Across Cancer

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with gBRCAm is crucial to facilitate screening strategies, preventive measures and the usage of targeted therapeutics in their management. This review examines the evidence for the latest predictive and therapeutic approaches in BRCA-associated cancers.

CLINICAL DESCRIPTION

Data supports the use of adjuvant olaparib in patients with gBRCAm high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer. In advanced gBRCAm HER2-negative breast cancer, the PARPis talazoparib and olaparib have demonstrated benefit over standard chemotherapy. In ovarian cancer, olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib can be used as monotherapy in frontline maintenance. Olaparib and bevacizumab as a combination can also be used as frontline maintenance. In the relapsed platinum-sensitive setting, olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib are effective maintenance options in BRCAm patients who are PARPi naive. Both olaparib and rucaparib are effective options in BRCAm metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence also exists for the benefit of PARPi combinations in mCRPC. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, olaparib can be used in gBRCAm patients who are responding to platinum chemotherapy. However, there may be a development of PARPi resistance. Understanding the pathophysiology that contributes to such resistance may allow the development of novel therapeutics. Combination therapy appears to have promising results in emerging trials. Seeking avenues for subsidised genetic testing can reduce the total costs of cancer management, leading to improve detection rates.

CONCLUSION

Identifying breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancer patients with gBRCAm plays a crucial predictive role in selecting those who will benefit significantly from PARPi therapy. The use of PARPi in gBRCAm HBOC-related cancers has resulted in significant survival benefits. Beyond BRCA1/2, HRR gene assessment and the consideration of other cancer predisposition syndromes may allow more patients to be eligible for and benefit from targeted therapies.

Are Probiotics Beneficial or Harmful for Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes?

Pancreatic cancer is influenced by interactions between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME), including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Specifically, CD8 + T cells impact prognosis by eliminating cancer cells. Recent studies have revealed that microbiomes are present in pancreatic tissues and may affect tumor growth and immune responses. Additionally, recent studies revealed that the abundance of Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, and Peptoniphilus are associated with poor pancreatic cancer prognosis. This study investigates the role of oral probiotics in influencing pancreatic cancer outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed patients aged ≥ 18 years with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer from Seoul National University Hospital between January 2011 and January 2023. We investigated progression-free survival and overall survival between the control group and the probiotics group. Among pancreatic cancer patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy without radiotherapy and resection, there was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) when comparing the control group to the probiotics group (median: 10 months (9-11) vs. 12 months (9-19), p = 0.026). Regardless of the type of probiotics, oral probiotics may have a positive impact, but further research is still needed to understand the underlying immunological mechanisms.

Oncometabolites in pancreatic cancer: Strategies and its implications

Pancreatic cancer (PanCa) is a catastrophic disease, being third lethal in both the genders around the globe. The possible reasons are extreme disease invasiveness, highly fibrotic and desmoplastic stroma, dearth of confirmatory diagnostic approaches and resistance to chemotherapeutics. This inimitable tumor microenvironment (TME) or desmoplasia with excessive extracellular matrix accumulation, create an extremely hypovascular, hypoxic and nutrient-deficient zone inside the tumor. To survive, grow and proliferate in such tough TME, pancreatic tumor and stromal cells transform their metabolism. Transformed glucose, glutamine, fat, nucleotide metabolism and inter-metabolite communication between tumor and TME in synergism, impart therapy resistance, and immunosuppression in PanCa. Thus, a finer knowledge of altered metabolism would uncover its metabolic susceptibilities. These unique metabolic targets may help to device novel diagnostic/prognostic markers and therapeutic strategies for better management of PanCa. In this review, we sum up reshaped metabolic pathways in PanCa to formulate detection and remedial strategies of this devastating disease.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line combination chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic cancer and evidence-based pricing strategy of liposomal irinotecan in China

Background

The phase III NAPOLI-3 trial, which upgraded FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) to NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil), demonstrated the superiority of NALIRIFOX over GEMNABP (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) as the first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and GEMNABP, and to simulate the price of liposomal irinotecan at which NALIRIFOX could achieve cost-effectiveness.

Methods

A partitioned survival model was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX and GEMNABP from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Survival data was obtained from a recently published network meta-analysis (NMA). Drug prices were collected from the database of the Hunan Province Drug and Medical Consumables Procurement Management Subsystem. Other cost and utility values were sourced from established literature. Cumulative costs, LYs (life-years), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), net monetary benefits (NMBs) and incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs) were the main outputs. Furthermore, the variations in ICER were analyzed as the price of liposomal irinotecan gradually decreased when comparing NALIRIFOX with FOLFIRINOX or GEMNABP. The robustness of the model was assessed by sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis.

Results

At the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,223.34, GEMNABP was the favored treatment. NALIRIFOX was associated with the highest LYs, QALYs, and cost. The cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX would be obtained if the price of liposomal irinotecan was less than $3.36/mg and $2.08/mg compared to FOLFIRINOX and GEMNABP, respectively, without considering the patient assistance program (PAP). Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis revealed that the results of the model were stable.

Conclusion

From an economic standpoint, GEMNABP represents the favored choice in the prevailing market conditions among these three first-line combination chemotherapy regimens. The price simulation of liposomal irinotecan conducted in this study could provide valuable evidence for healthcare decision-making. Further evidence regarding the budget impact is still needed.

Regorafenib induces DNA damage and enhances PARP inhibitor efficacy in pancreatic ductal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in enhancing the response of the PARP inhibitor olaparib, which is currently approved for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with defects in DNA damage repair associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Moreover, agents that can mimic these defects in the absence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations are an area of active research in hopes of increasing the number of patients eligible for treatment with PARP inhibitors. The extent to which regorafenib, an FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can be used to enhance the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in PDAC cells without known BRCA1/2 mutations remains to be investigated.

METHODS

Comet assay, cell cycle analysis, western blotting, and immunofluorescent detection of H2AXS139 were used to evaluate the extent to which regorafenib induces DNA damage in PDAC cell lines. The effects of regorafenib, either alone or in combination with PARPi inhibitors, on PDAC cell death were assessed by Annexin V/PI co-staining assay in cell lines and by immunohistochemistry staining for cleaved caspase-3 in mouse tumors and in ex vivo slice cultures of human PDAC tumors. Flow cytometry-based analysis was used to evaluate the ability of regorafenib to reprogram PDAC tumor microenvironment.

RESULTS

We now show that regorafenib, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor with efficacy in several gastrointestinal malignancies, can enhance the response of olaparib in pancreatic cancer. While regorafenib induces DNA damage and limits the ability of PDAC cells to resolve the damage, regorafenib by itself does not induce apoptosis. However, regorafenib in combination with olaparib further induces DNA damage in vitro, in tumor-bearing mice, and in ex vivo slice cultures of human PDAC tumors, resulting in increased apoptosis compared to olaparib alone. Notably, we show that the efficacy of the combination treatment is not dependent on cytolytic T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these findings demonstrate that regorafenib can attenuate DNA damage response and potentiate the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in PDAC tumors.

At the right time: Moving precision therapy to newly diagnosed cancer

Precision oncology aims to match the right drug(s) to the right patient. Equally important is ensuring that precision therapies are offered at the right time. Transformative, rather than incremental, outcome improvement may require treatment at diagnosis rather than in the advanced/metastatic setting after genomic evolution.

Case report: Microsatellite instability-high pancreas adenosquamous carcinoma with postoperative liver metastasis recurrence treated with multimodality therapy achieving complete pathological response

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer (PC), with no established consensus on the optimal treatment for postoperative liver metastasis recurrence. We report a case of a 48-year-old male patient who underwent radical surgery and was pathologically diagnosed with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) PASC. The patient experienced liver metastasis recurrence following single-agent gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy. After one session of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and epirubicin, followed by six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel combined with sintilimab immunotherapy and bevacizumab targeted therapy, complete pathological regression of the liver metastasis was achieved. The patient has now reached a 24-month survival period and continues to be monitored at our center. This case illustrates the promise of the proposed treatment regimen, highlighting the significant potential of multimodality strategies in managing metastatic recurrence of MSI-H PASC.

Improved Antitumor Efficiency of N4 -Tetradecyloxycarbonyl Gemcitabine-Loaded Liposomes for Pancreatic Cancer Chemotherapy

Background

Gemcitabine (Gem) is one of the first-line chemotherapy drugs for pancreatic cancer treatment. However, its short half-life in plasma and adverse effects limited its broader application.

Methods

A novel Gem derivative (N4 -tetradecyloxycarbonyl gemcitabine, tcGem) was synthesized and encapsulated into liposomes (LipotcGem) to overcome the above shortcomings.

Results

LipotcGem has been successfully formulated, with the average size of 115 nm, zeta potential values of -36 mV, encapsulation efficiency of up to 98%, and drug loading capacity of 8.1%. Compared to Gem, LipotcGem improved in vitro antitumor activity significantly, as evidenced by the lower IC50, the higher percentage of apoptotic cells, the stronger ability to inhibit cell migration and invasion due to the higher cellular accumulation (100 times). Additionally, the endocytosis of LipotcGem was mainly mediated by caveolae, and was then processed in the lysosome, where tcGem was released and hydrolyzed into Gem. LipotcGem inhibited tumor growth by 70% in subcutaneous xenograft model and 90% in orthotopic xenograft model, respectively. LipotcGem suppressed tumor metastasis and prolonged survival without perceptible systemic toxicity, which may be caused by the longer t1/2 in vivo (3.5 times, 5.23 vs 1.46 h) and more enrichment in tumor tissue (750 times).

Conclusion

LipotcGem significantly increased the anti-tumor efficiency and decreased the toxicity for chemotherapy of pancreatic cancer.

Anlotinib plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for gastrointestinal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases: a multicohort, multicenter, exploratory trial

This multicohort phase II trial (ALTER-G-001; NCT05262335) aimed to assess the efficacy of first-line anlotinib plus chemotherapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases. Eligible patients with colorectal cancer (Cohort A) or noncolorectal and nonesophageal GI cancer (Cohort C) received six cycles of anlotinib plus standard chemotherapeutic regimens followed by anlotinib plus metronomic capecitabine as a maintenance therapy. Liver metastasectomy can be performed when liver metastases are converted to resectable lesions. The primary outcome was the investigator-confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in the intention-to-treat population. Among the 47 patients in Cohort A, the ORR was 40.4% (95% CI 26.4-55.7), including 1 with a complete response (CR) and 18 who achieved a partial response (PR). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.7 months (95% CI 7.3-NE), and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. In Cohort C, 14 of 44 patients achieved a PR, with an ORR of 31.8% (95% CI 18.6-47.6). The PFS and OS were 5.8 months (95% CI 4.8-6.5) and 11.4 months (95% CI 5.8-19.3), respectively. The liver metastasectomy rate in patients with liver-limited disease was 22.7% (5/22) in Cohort A and 6.7% (2/30) in Cohort C. For pancreatic cancer patients, the ORR of the efficacy-evaluable population was 36.0% (9/25), and those with liver-limited metastasis had better survival. Moreover, no new safety concerns emerged. In conclusion, an anlotinib-based first-line regimen demonstrated promising antitumor activity among GI cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases and led to liver metastasectomy in selected patients.

Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection and Reconstruction for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

With the advent of effective chemotherapy, conversion surgery (CS) has been performed in patients who have responded to pretreatment, even for pancreatic cancer diagnosed as unresectable (UR) at the time of initial diagnosis. In CS, major arterial resection and reconstruction are necessary for complete radical resection.

METHODS

We discuss the key points for safely performing pancreatectomy with celiac axis (CA) resection combined with reconstruction, divided into resection and arterial reconstruction. The possibility of safe pancreatectomy concurrent with CA resection and reconstruction depends on the ability to create a "golden view" that provides an unimpaired view of the Abdominal Aorta, CA, Superior Mesenteric Artery, Inferior Vena Cava, and left renal vein from the ventral side. Pancreatectomy concurrent with CA resection requires arterial reconstruction. Postoperatively, arterial blood flow must be maintained. To achieve this, tension-free and short bypass should be observed.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2024, sixteen URLA patients underwent CS, requiring major artery en bloc resection after pretreatment. We performed DP-CAR in eight patients, gastrectomy-distal pancreatectomy-splenectomy (Appleby procedure) procedure in one patient, PD-CHAR in two patients, PD-CAR in two patients, TP-CAR(spleen preserving) in one patient, and TP-CAR+TG in two patients. In total, five patients required surgery with CA reconstruction. Histopathologically, four of the five patients had T4 pancreatic cancer. The R0 surgical rate was 80%. Complication of Clavien-Dindo IIIa or higher was observed in one patient. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Parallel to the determination of pretreatment, surgeons must be prepared to safely and reliably perform pancreatectomies that require concurrent major arterial resection and reconstruction.

Nomogram for predicting post-progression-free survival in patients with recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical surgery: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical resection is the only curative method for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, nearly 85% of PDAC patients suffer from local or distant recurrence within 5 years after curative resection. The progression of recurrent lesions accelerates the mortality rate in PDAC patients. However, the influence of clinicopathological factors on post-progression-free survival (PPFS), defined as the period from tumor recurrence to the timing of the progression of recurrent lesions, has rarely been discussed. The present study aimed to explore the independent prognostic factors for PPFS and construct a nomogram for PPFS prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 200 recurrent PDAC patients were divided into training and validation groups by leave-one-out cross-validation. The patients' clinicopathological characteristics were compared through a chi-square test. Meanwhile, these factors were enrolled in the univariate and multivariate COX regression to find the independent prognostic factors of PPFS. Moreover, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on the independent prognostic factors was performed. Finally, we constructed a nomogram model for PPFS prediction, followed by an effectiveness examination.

RESULTS

PDAC patients who received multi-agent chemotherapy after surgery showed a longer PPFS than the single-agent chemotherapy group. PDAC patients who received multi-agent chemotherapy after recurrence showed a similar PPFS compared to the single-agent chemotherapy group. Local recurrence with distant metastases, early recurrence, lympho-vascular invasion, higher T stage, and higher N stage predicted shorter PPFS in recurrent PDAC patients. Finally, a nomogram to indicate the progression of recurrent lesions was constructed.

CONCLUSION

Multi-agent chemotherapy is recommended for PDAC patients after surgery. Meanwhile, single-agent chemotherapy also deserves consideration after tumor recurrence. Moreover, the nomogram could be used in PPFS prediction.

Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages targeting c-MET(CAR-M-c-MET) inhibit pancreatic cancer progression and improve cytotoxic chemotherapeutic efficacy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most malignant tumors. Macrophages are abundant in the tumor microenvironment, making them an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. While current immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, have shown limited efficacy in pancreatic cancer, a novel approach involving chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-M) has, although promising, not been explored in pancreatic cancer. In this study, we first investigated the role of CAR-M cells targeting c-MET in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The effectiveness and rationality of c-MET as a target for CAR-M in pancreatic cancer were validated through bioinformatic analyses and immunohistochemical staining of samples from pancreatic cancer patients. We utilized flow cytometry and bioluminescence detection methods to demonstrate the specific binding and phagocytic killing effect of CAR-M on pancreatic cancer cells. Additionally, we observed the process of CAR-M engulfing pancreatic cancer cells using confocal microscopy and a long-term fluorescence live cell imaging system. In an in situ tumor model transplanted into NOD/SCID mice, we administered intraperitoneal injections of CAR-M to confirm its inhibitory function on pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we validated these findings in human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDM).

RESULTS

Bioinformatics and tumor tissue microarray analyses revealed significantly higher expression levels of c-MET in tumor tissues, compared to the paired peritumoral tissues, and higher c-MET expression correlated with worse patient survival. CAR-M cells were engineered using human monocytic THP-1 cell line and hMDM targeting c-MET (CAR-M-c-MET). The CAR-M-c-MET cells demonstrated highly specific binding to pancreatic cancer cells and exhibited more phagocytosis and killing abilities than the pro-inflammatory polarized control macrophages. In addition, CAR-M-c-MET cells synergized with various cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs. In a NOD/SCID murine model, intraperitoneally injected CAR-M-c-MET cells rapidly migrated to tumor tissue and substantially inhibited tumor growth, which did not lead to obvious side effects. Cytokine arrays and mRNA sequencing showed that CAR-M-c-MET produced higher levels of immune activators than control macrophages.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides compelling evidence for the safety and efficacy of CAR-M therapy in treating pancreatic cancer. The results demonstrate that CAR-M-c-MET significantly suppresses pancreatic cancer progression and enhances the effectiveness of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Remarkably, no discernible side effects occur. Further clinical trials are warranted in human pancreatic cancer patients.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal disease with few effective treatment options. Many anti-cancer therapies have been tested in the locally advanced and metastatic setting, with mixed results. This review synthesises all the randomised data available to help better inform patient and clinician decision-making. It updates the previous version of the review, published in 2018.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both on overall survival, severe or life-threatening adverse events, and quality of life in people undergoing first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for published and unpublished studies in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CANCERLIT, and handsearched various sources for additional studies. The latest search dates were in March and July 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both with another intervention or best supportive care. Participants were required to have locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer or metastatic pancreatic cancer not amenable to curative intent treatment. Histological confirmation was required. Trials were required to report overall survival.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 75 studies in the review and 51 in the meta-analysis (11,333 participants). We divided the studies into seven categories: any anti-cancer treatment versus best supportive care; various chemotherapy types versus gemcitabine; gemcitabine-based combinations versus gemcitabine alone; various chemotherapy combinations versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; fluoropyrimidine-based studies; miscellaneous studies; and radiotherapy studies. In general, the included studies were at low risk for random sequence generation, detection bias, attrition bias, and reporting bias, at unclear risk for allocation concealment, and high risk for performance bias. Compared to best supportive care, chemotherapy likely results in little to no difference in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.33; absolute risk of death at 12 months of 971 per 1000 versus 962 per 1000; 4 studies, 298 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The adverse effects of chemotherapy and impacts on quality of life (QoL) were uncertain. Many of the chemotherapy regimens were outdated. Eight studies compared non-gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens to gemcitabine. These showed that 5-fluorouracil (5FU) likely reduces OS (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.27; risk of death at 12 months of 914 per 1000 versus 767 per 1000; 1 study, 126 participants; moderate certainty), and grade 3/4 adverse events (QoL not reported). Fixed dose rate gemcitabine likely improves OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.94; risk of death at 12 months of 683 per 1000 versus 767 per 1000; 2 studies, 644 participants; moderate certainty), and likely increase grade 3/4 adverse events (QoL not reported). FOLFIRINOX improves OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.60; risk of death at 12 months of 524 per 1000 versus 767 per 1000; P < 0.001; 2 studies, 652 participants; high certainty), and delays deterioration in QoL, but increases grade 3/4 adverse events. Twenty-eight studies compared gemcitabine-based combinations to gemcitabine. Gemcitabine plus platinum may result in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.08; risk of death at 12 months of 745 per 1000 versus 767 per 1000; 6 studies, 1140 participants; low certainty), may increase grade 3/4 adverse events, and likely worsens QoL. Gemcitabine plus fluoropyrimidine improves OS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95; risk of death at 12 months of 722 per 1000 versus 767 per 1000; 10 studies, 2718 participants; high certainty), likely increases grade 3/4 adverse events, and likely improves QoL. Gemcitabine plus topoisomerase inhibitors result in little to no difference in OS (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.16; risk of death at 12 months of 770 per 1000 versus 767 per 1000; 3 studies, 839 participants; high certainty), likely increases grade 3/4 adverse events, and likely does not alter QoL. Gemcitabine plus taxane result in a large improvement in OS (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.81; risk of death at 12 months of 644 per 1000 versus 767 per 1000; 2 studies, 986 participants; high certainty), and likely increases grade 3/4 adverse events and improves QoL. Nine studies compared chemotherapy combinations to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Fluoropyrimidine-based combination regimens improve OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89; risk of death at 12 months of 542 per 1000 versus 628 per 1000; 6 studies, 1285 participants; high certainty). The treatment arms had distinct toxicity profiles, and there was little to no difference in QoL. Alternative schedules of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel likely result in little to no difference in OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.47; risk of death at 12 months of 663 per 1000 versus 628 per 1000; 2 studies, 367 participants; moderate certainty) or QoL, but may increase grade 3/4 adverse events. Four studies compared fluoropyrimidine-based combinations to fluoropyrimidines alone, with poor quality evidence. Fluoropyrimidine-based combinations are likely to result in little to no impact on OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.15; risk of death at 12 months of 765 per 1000 versus 704 per 1000; P = 0.27; 4 studies, 491 participants; moderate certainty) versus fluoropyrimidines alone. The evidence suggests that there was little to no difference in grade 3/4 adverse events or QoL between the two groups. We included only one radiotherapy (iodine-125 brachytherapy) study with 165 participants. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of radiotherapy on outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy remains standard of care for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Both FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus a taxane improve OS compared to gemcitabine alone. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that fluoropyrimidine-based combination chemotherapy regimens improve OS compared to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. The effects of radiotherapy were uncertain as only one low-quality trial was included. Selection of the most appropriate chemotherapy for individuals still remains unpersonalised, with clinicopathological stratification remaining elusive. Biomarker development is essential to assist in rationalising treatment selection for patients.

Radioresistance-related gene signatures identified by transcriptomics characterize the prognosis and immune landscape of pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is an important means of local treatment of solid tumors, and radioresistance is the main reason for RT failure for tumors, especially pancreatic cancer (PC). It is urgent to distinguish key genes and mechanisms of radioresistance in PC.

METHODS

We acquired the data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), obtained the gene modules associated with radioresistance by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor samples. Radioresistance-related genes (RRRGs) were determined with the intersection of WGCNA and DEGs. The hub RRRGs associated with prognosis were distinguished by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. We established a risk score model using multivariate Cox regression. Immune cell infiltration and drug sensitivity were evaluated through the CIBERSORT algorithm and the "OncoPredict" software package, respectively. The association of the key gene RIC3 and PC clinical features was verified in public databases, and its biological behaviors were explored in vitro.

RESULTS

The intersection of DEGs and WGCNA confirmed 14 RRRGs, then six hub RRRGs were identified using LASSO. A key four genes (DUSP4, ADORA2B, SCGB2A1, and RIC3) risk score model was constructed and proved to be capable of independently estimating the prognosis of PC. There is no significant difference between risk score groups in various immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapy. Although the low-risk group seemed to exhibit greater sensitivity to antitumor drugs, the four drugs (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) currently used for PC patients had no statistical difference for the low- and high- group. The overexpression of RIC3 had a synergy effect with irradiation on inhibited malignant biological properties of PC cells, which was verified by detecting the proliferation ability, apoptosis rate, cell cycle distribution, and migration ability of PANC-1 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We herein presented signature genes correlated with radioresistance in PC and established a risk score model competent in estimating patients' clinical outcomes and response to antitumor drugs. The above evidence could contribute to comprehending the mechanisms of radioresistance and identifying the underlying therapy targeting.

A High-Affinity Monoclonal Antibody Against the Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Target, Anterior Gradient-2 (AGR2/PDIA17)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Anterior Gradient-2 (AGR2/PDIA17) is a member of the protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) family of oxidoreductases. AGR2 is up-regulated in several solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Given the dire need for new therapeutic options for PDAC patients, we investigated the expression and function of AGR2 in PDAC and developed a novel series of affinity-matured AGR2-specific single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) and monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

We found that AGR2 was expressed in approximately 90% of PDAC but not normal pancreas biopsies, and the level of AGR2 expression correlated with increasing disease stage. AGR2 expression was inversely related to SMAD4 status in PDAC and colorectal cancer cell models and was secreted from cells into their media. In normal tissues, a high density of AGR2 was detected in the epithelium of cells in the digestive tract but was lacking in most other normal tissue systems. The addition of recombinant AGR2 to cell culture and genetic overexpression of AGR2 increased the adhesion, motility, and invasiveness of both human and mouse PDAC cells. Human phage display library screening led to the discovery of multiple AGR2-specific scFv clones that were affinity-matured to produce monoclonal antibody (MAb) clones with low picomolar binding affinity (S31R/A53F/Y). These high-affinity MAbs inhibited AGR2-mediated cell adhesion, migration, and binding to LYPD3, which is a putative cell surface binding partner of AGR2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides novel, high-affinity, fully human, anti-AGR2 MAbs that neutralize the pro-tumor effects of extracellular AGR2 in PDAC.

Clinical Benefits and Utility of Pretherapeutic DPYD and UGT1A1 Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

To date, the clinical benefit and utility of implementing a DPYD/UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic-informed therapy with fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan have not been prospectively investigated.

Objective

To examine clinically relevant toxic effects, hospitalizations, and related costs while preserving treatment intensity and efficacy outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nonprespecified secondary analysis stems from Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenomic Testing for Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions (PREPARE), a multicenter, controlled, open, block-randomized, crossover implementation trial conducted from March 7, 2017, to June 30, 2020, and includes data from Italy according to a sequential study design. The study population included 563 patients (intervention, 252; control [standard of care], 311) with gastrointestinal cancer (age ≥18 years) who were eligible for fluoropyrimidine and/or irinotecan treatment. Data analysis for the present study was performed from May 27 to October 10, 2024.

Interventions

Participants with actionable variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, .DPYD c.2846A>T, and DPYD c.1236G>A for fluoropyrimidines, and UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*6, and UGT1A1*27 for irinotecan) received drug or dose adjustments based on Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group recommendations.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was clinically relevant toxic effects (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥4 hematologic, grade ≥3 nonhematologic, or causing hospitalization, fluoropyrimidines and/or irinotecan causally related). Secondary outcomes included hospitalization rates, toxic effect management costs, intensity of treatment, quality-adjusted life-years, and 3-year overall survival.

Results

Overall, 1232 patients were enrolled in Italy, with 563 included in this analysis (317 [56.3%] men; median age, 68.0 [IQR, 60.0-75.0] years). In the intervention arm, carriers of any actionable genotype exhibited a 90% lower risk of clinically relevant toxic effects compared with the control arm (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-0.8; P = .04). They also presented higher toxic effect management costs per patient ($4159; 95% CI, $1510-$6810) compared with patients in the intervention arm ($26; 95% CI, 0-$312) (P = .004) and a higher rate of hospitalization (34.8% vs 11.8%; P = .12). The differences were not significant among all patients. Three-year overall survival did not differ significantly between arms, while quality-adjusted life-years significantly improved in the intervention arm. The pharmacogenetics-informed approach did not manifest a detrimental effect on treatment intensity in actionable genotype carriers.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this secondary analysis of PREPARE, pretreatment application of DPYD- and UGT1A1-guided treatment appeared to increase safety and reduce hospitalizations and related costs in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Clinical benefit did not appear to be affected.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03093818.

A Targetable Secreted Neural Protein Drives Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic Colonization and HIF1α Nuclear Retention

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an increasingly diagnosed cancer that kills 90% of afflicted patients, with most patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. We identified neuronal pentraxin 1 (NPTX1) as a cancer-secreted protein that becomes overexpressed in human and murine PDAC cells during metastatic progression and identified adhesion molecule with Ig-like domain 2 (AMIGO2) as its receptor. Molecular, genetic, biochemical, and pharmacologic experiments revealed that secreted NPTX1 acts cell-autonomously on the AMIGO2 receptor to drive PDAC metastatic colonization of the liver-the primary site of PDAC metastasis. NPTX1-AMIGO2 signaling enhanced hypoxic growth and was critically required for hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) nuclear retention and function. NPTX1 is overexpressed in human PDAC tumors and upregulated in liver metastases. Therapeutic targeting of NPTX1 with a high-affinity monoclonal antibody substantially reduced PDAC liver metastatic colonization. We thus identify NPTX1-AMIGO2 as druggable critical upstream regulators of the HIF1α hypoxic response in PDAC. Significance: We identified the NPTX1-AMIGO2 axis as a regulatory mechanism upstream of HIF1α-driven hypoxia response that promotes PDAC liver metastasis. Therapeutic NPTX1 targeting outperformed a common chemotherapy regimen in inhibiting liver metastasis and suppressed primary tumor growth in preclinical models, revealing a novel therapeutic strategy targeting hypoxic response in PDAC.

How to find a needle in a haystack: a systematic review on targeting KRAS wild-type pancreatic cancer

Aim: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a very aggressive type of cancer, in which targeted therapies have not yet been fully utilized. KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors are associated with different genomic alterations in comparison to KRAS mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Objective: This systematic review aims to provide a one-stop summary of all these alterations, their proposed targeted treatment and their effect on disease progression. Methods: An electronic search strategy was elaborated in the PubMed database between 2020 and January 2024. Results: 21 studies were included, and we found that the most frequent targetable genomic alterations in KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma were BRAF, EGFR, FGFR, MSI-H/dMMR, Her2/ERBB2 amplification, BRCA1/2 and other HRDs, and gene fusions like ALK, NTRK and NRG1.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy Plus Nivolumab in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Results from Phase 1/2 Clinical CA209-9KH Trial

INTRODUCTION

The dismal prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) highlights the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) seem to be ineffective in most PDAC studies. Therefore, we conducted an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study (CA209-9KH) to evaluate the safety of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and sequential ICI therapy in PDAC, as well as to validate the efficacy of this regimen as a potential activator of antitumor immunity.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with unresectable non-metastatic PDAC following four FOLFIRINOX induction cycles were included. Treatment comprised SRT (4 × 8 Gy) and sequential nivolumab administration until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were safety and toxicity assessment. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), biomarker evaluation, and quality of life (QoL) analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were screened, with 15 enrolled. Eleven (median) nivolumab cycles were administered. SRT demonstrated low and clinically nonsignificant toxicity, whereas nivolumab toxicity aligned with prior safety profiles, without grade 4-5 events observed. Three patients discontinued therapy owing to toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 8.1 and 13.0 months, respectively, with 12-month PFS and OS rates of 0% and 66.7%, respectively, and a 24-month OS rate of 8.9%. Biomarker levels correlated with clinical or radiological disease control. Patient-reported QoL remained acceptable, deteriorating with disease progression.

CONCLUSION

SRT and nivolumab therapy exhibited manageable toxicity profiles consistent with previous findings; however, long-term treatment responses were not achieved with this regimen in locally advanced PDAC. Another strategy to trigger antitumor immunity in PDAC needs to be sought.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2017-003404-52; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04098432.

The prognostic role of WeChat-based instant doctor-patient communication in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) need timely medical assistance since the emergence of complications due to the disease and antitumor treatment. Studies have confirmed that instant messaging can improve the quality of life and compliance of cancer patients. However, the prognostic role of instant doctor-patient communication based on instant messaging applications in PDAC has not been studied.

METHODS

Patients with PDAC who received first-line chemotherapy at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2015 and October 2022 were reviewed. We categorized patients into two groups according to whether they received WeChat-based instant doctor-patient communication, and the prognosis and toxicity data between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 431 PDAC patients were enrolled, of whom 163 had long-term instant communication with their doctors based on WeChat, and 268 did not receive WeChat-based instant communication. There was no significant correlation between WeChat-based communication and first-line chemotherapy overall response rate (14.1% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.074), incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (66.9% vs. 65.7%, p = 0.814) or overall survival (14.7 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.170) in all enrolled patients. However, patients who received WeChat-based instant communication had a higher completion rate of first-line chemotherapy (42.0% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.023). Consistently, in the patients who developed grade ≥ 3 adverse events (n = 231), those who received WeChat-based instant communication had significantly longer overall survival (17.3 vs. 15.3 months, p = 0.018), even after adjustment for biases.

CONCLUSIONS

WeChat-based instant doctor-patient communication demonstrated no superiority in improving the efficacy of chemotherapy or preventing chemotherapy toxicity in PDAC patients, but it may contribute to improving the completion rate of chemotherapy and the prognosis in patients who experienced severe adverse events.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Instant doctor‒patient communication may help to timely and appropriately deal with adverse events and prolong the survival time of patients with PDAC, supporting the promotion of mobile technology in clinical practice.

Combination of S-1 and the oral ATR inhibitor ceralasertib is effective against pancreatic cancer cells

PURPOSE

In our previous study, we found that the Chk1 inhibitor prexasertib enhances the antitumour effect of the oral anticancer drug S-1 against pancreatic cancer cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of combining S-1 and ceralasertib, an oral inhibitor of ATR, which is located upstream of Chk1. Ceralasertib is currently being investigated in multiple clinical trials for various cancers.

METHODS

The cell-proliferation inhibitory effect was measured by MTT assay, using the pancreatic cancer cell lines BxPC-3, SUIT-2, PANC-1, and MIA PaCa-2, while apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry using PI/Annexin staining. The mechanism underlying the combined effect was analysed using western blotting, and the antitumor effect was analysed using a mouse xenograft model.

RESULTS

MTT assay revealed that the combination of S-1 and ceralasertib had a synergistic effect, leading to the suppression of cell proliferation. Measurement with PI/Annexin staining revealed that the combination of S-1 and ceralasertib induced apoptosis more efficiently than either drug alone. Western blotting results showed that ceralasertib inhibited S-1-induced activation of ATR and Chk1. The average estimated tumour volume after 3 weeks of administration was 601 mm3 in the S-1 group, 580 mm3 in the ceralasertib group, and 298 mm3 in the combination group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1 and ceralasertib demonstrated a high antiproliferative effect in inhibiting tumour growth in vitro.

Triptolide exhibits dual anti-tumor effects through inhibiting autophagy and extracellular matrix activation in pancreatic cancer

AIM

The tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer, characterized by abundant desmoplastic stroma, has been implicated in the failure of chemotherapy. Therefore, developing therapeutic strategies targeting tumor and stromal cells is essential. Triptolide, a natural compound derived from the plant Tripterygium wilfordii, has shown antitumor activity in various cancers, including pancreatic cancer. However, its effects on pancreatic cancer cells and the microenvironment remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of triptolide on tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Cell Counting Kit-8, colony formation, apoptosis, and cell cycle assays were performed to determine the effect of triptolide on tumor cells. Additionally, co-culture assays were performed to explore the effects of the compound on cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in vitro. Orthotopic xenograft and subcutaneous tumor models were used to explore the antitumor and antistromal activation effects of triptolide in vivo. RNA sequencing was performed to identify the pathways involved in these processes in pancreatic cancer cells.

RESULTS

Triptolide inhibited the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells and attenuated stromal activation in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, it suppressed autophagy and induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells by inhibiting the secretion of CXCL1. Extracellular matrix formation in CAFs was disrupted by suppressing the paracrine secretion of TGF-β from tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that triptolide plays a dual antitumor role against tumor cells and CAFs, thus providing new insights into treating pancreatic cancer in the future.

Factors associated with favourable pathological tumour response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Pathological response of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) has been associated with oncological outcome. The aim of the study was to investigate factors associated with favourable tumour regression in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for PDAC.

METHODS

Patients who received NAT before undergoing PDAC resection at two institutions were reviewed. Tumour regression grading (TRG) was scored according to the College of American Pathologists (CAP) system. Interactions between chemotherapy, tumour and surgical factors with TRG were explored.

RESULTS

54 patients were identified, with 12 (22%) displaying a favourable response to NAT. The type of chemotherapy agent received, the number of cycles or a dose reduction during NAT course was not significantly different between the groups. The time from diagnosis to chemotherapy and time from end of chemotherapy to surgery were also similar between the groups. A favourable TRG was associated with greater disease-free survival median 33.2 months vs. 10.3 months; p = 0.0) but not overall survival (median 43.8 months vs. 32.3 months; p = 0.200), which may be due to small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy factors were not significantly related to a favourable response to NAT. Future studies should seek to identify modifiable factors associated with a favourable TRG.

Impact of proton pump inhibitors on pathologic response rates following fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) negatively impact fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer. This study assessed PPI impact on major pathologic response (mPR) rates of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

An institutional retrospective review of resected PDAC patients receiving neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (98% FOLFIRINOX) from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. Outcomes were stratified by use or nonuse of PPIs within 6 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy initiation. Primary outcome was mPR defined as complete or near complete response.

RESULTS

Among 540 patients included, the median age was 64 (IQR: 60-70) years, 297 (55%) were male, and 202 (37%) were PPI users. 170 (31%) patients had mPR with similar rates among PPI users and nonusers (29% vs. 33%, p = 0.38). No difference in mPR was seen between PPI users and nonusers receiving chemoradiation (35% vs. 36%, p = 0.89) or ≥8 cycles of NAC (33% vs. 36%, p = 0.55). Median OS for PPI users was 30.9 versus 31.7 months for nonusers (p = 0.62). On multivariable analysis, PPI therapy was not associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSION

PPI usage did not significantly influence mPR or OS following neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients. Further analysis of all patients, not just those who underwent resection, is required.

Key genes and pathways in the molecular landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A bioinformatics and machine learning study

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is recognized for its aggressive nature, dismal prognosis, and a notably low five-year survival rate, underscoring the critical need for early detection methods and more effective therapeutic approaches. This research rigorously investigates the molecular mechanisms underlying PDAC, with a focus on the identification of pivotal genes and pathways that may hold therapeutic relevance and prognostic value. Through the construction of a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and the examination of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), the study uncovers key hub genes such as CDK1, KIF11, and BUB1, demonstrating their substantial role in the pathogenesis of PDAC. Notably, the dysregulation of these genes is consistent across a spectrum of cancers, positing them as potential targets for wide-ranging cancer therapeutics. This study also brings to the fore significant genes encoding intrinsically disordered proteins, in particular GPRC5A and KRT7, unveiling promising new pathways for therapeutic intervention. Advanced machine learning techniques were harnessed to classify PDAC patients with high accuracy, utilizing the key genetic markers as a dataset. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model leveraged the hub genes to achieve a sensitivity of 91 % and a specificity of 85 %, while the RandomForest model notched a sensitivity of 91 % and specificity of 92.5 %. Crucially, when the identified genes were cross-referenced with TCGA-PAAD clinical datasets, a tangible correlation with patient survival rates was discovered, reinforcing the potential of these genes as prognostic biomarkers and their viability as targets for therapeutic intervention. This study's findings serve as a potent testament to the value of molecular analysis in enhancing the understanding of PDAC and in advancing the pursuit for more effective diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Survival Analysis of Conversion Surgery in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Addressing Selection and Immortal Time Bias: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to provide a detailed evaluation of the oncological advantages of surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with borderline resectable (BR) or unresectable (UR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a focus on minimizing biases. Recently, NAC has become the standard care for BR or UR locally advanced (UR-LA) PDAC, however, many studies have assessed survival benefits and favorable variables without consideration for biases, particularly immortal time bias.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included patients diagnosed with BR or UR-LA PDAC at Juntendo University Hospital from 2019 to 2022. To mitigate bias, we applied methods such as propensity score matching (PSM), time-dependent covariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (TDC), landmark analysis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 124 patients, dividing them into a surgery group (n = 57) and a chemotherapy-only group (n = 67). After PSM, there were 21 matched pairs. Survival analysis using TDC analysis showed that the surgery group had significantly better overall survival compared with the chemotherapy-only group in both the entire cohort and the matched pairs. Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort also revealed a similar superiority of surgery, while the landmark analysis showed varying results depending on the landmark setting.

CONCLUSIONS

After careful adjustment for selection and immortal time biases, surgery following NAC appears to significantly extend survival in patients with BR or UR PDAC.

Comparison of first-line chemotherapy regimens in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), first-line chemotherapy is the standard of care. Due to the absence of head-to-head comparisons in clinical trials, we performed this systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare treatment options for PDAC in terms of their efficacy and toxicity.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and oncological meetings websites were searched until Nov 15, 2023. We included phase 2-3 randomised controlled trials published after Jan 1, 2000, evaluating first-line treatments in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Primary endpoints assessed were progression-free survival and overall survival. Summary data were extracted from published reports. The deviance information criterion was used to choose between a random-effects or fixed-effects model. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% credible intervals were estimated using a Bayesian approach. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool and studies were graded as low, some concerns, or high risk of bias. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. This systematic review and network meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023450330.

FINDINGS

6050 records were screened and 79 randomised controlled trials (22 168 patients) were included in the analysis. Gemcitabine was the most frequent comparator (in 50 [63%] of 79 trials) and was considered as the reference treatment. A fixed-effect model was used to analyse the primary outcomes. Regarding progression-free survival (71 trials, 19 479 patients), the most effective treatments were gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel alternating folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin ([FOLFOX] HR 0·32, 95% credible interval 0·22-0·47), cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine ([PAXG] 0·35, 0·22-0·55), and liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin ([NALIRIFOX] 0·43, 0·34-0·54), followed by fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin ([FOLFIRINOX] 0·55, 0·47-0·65) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (0·62, 0·54-0·72). Similar results were observed for overall survival (79 trials, 22 104 patients): PAXG (HR 0·40, 95% credible interval 0·25-0·65), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel alternating FOLFOX (0·46, 0·32-0·66), and NALIRIFOX (0·56, 0·45-0·70) had the highest benefit, followed by FOLFIRINOX (0·66, 0·56-0·78) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (0·67, 0·59-0·77). The overall risk of bias was low to some concerns. Certainty of evidence was low.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that NALIRIFOX and FOLFIRINOX should be the preferred options for patients who can tolerate these regimens, with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel remaining a viable alternative, particularly in patients unfit for triplet therapy. Phase 3 randomised controlled trials investigating concomitant or sequential quadruplets are warranted.

FUNDING

None.

Clinical and molecular features of early onset pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major health burden and may become the second cause of death by cancer in developed countries. The incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC, defined by an age at diagnosis <50 years old) is increasing. Here, we conducted a study of all PDAC patients followed at our institution. Patients were classified as EOPC or non-early onset (nEOPC, >50). Eight hundred and seventy eight patients were included, of which 113 EOPC, exhibiting a comparable performance status. EOPC were more often diagnosed at the metastatic stage (70.0% vs 58.3%) and liver metastases were more prevalent at diagnosis (60.2% vs. 43.9%). The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 18.1 months, similar between EOPC and nEOPC. Among patients who underwent surgery, recurrence-free survival was similar between age groups. Among metastatic patients, first line progression free survival was similar but EOPC received more treatment lines (72.3% vs. 58.1% received ≥2 lines). Regarding molecular alterations, the mean tumor mutational burden (TMB) was lower in EOPC (1.42 vs. 2.95 mut/Mb). The prevalence of KRAS and BRCA1/2 mutations was similar, but EOPC displayed fewer alterations in CNKN2A/B. Fifty eight patients (18.6%) had actionable alterations (ESCAT I-III) and 31 of them received molecularly matched treatments. On the transcriptomic level, despite its clinical aggressiveness, EOPC was less likely to display a basal-like phenotype. To conclude, EOPC were diagnosed more frequently at the metastatic stage. OS and 1st line PFS were similar to nEOPC. EOPC displayed specific molecular features, such as a lower TMB and fewer alterations in CDKN2A/B.

Association of Mutant KRAS Alleles With Morphology and Clinical Outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

CONTEXT.—

Mutant KRAS is the main oncogenic driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). However, the clinical and phenotypic implications of harboring different mutant KRAS alleles remain poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE.—

To characterize the potential morphologic and clinical outcome differences in PDACs harboring distinct mutant KRAS alleles.

DESIGN.—

Cohort 1 consisted of 127 primary conventional PDACs with no neoadjuvant therapy, excluding colloid/mucinous, adenosquamous, undifferentiated, and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-associated carcinomas, for which an in-house 42-gene mutational panel had been performed. A morphologic classification system was devised wherein each tumor was assigned as conventional, papillary/large duct (P+LD, defined as neoplastic glands with papillary structure and/or with length ≥0.5 mm), or poorly differentiated (when the aforementioned component was 60% or more of the tumor). Cohort 2 was a cohort of 88 PDACs in The Cancer Genome Atlas, which were similarly analyzed.

RESULTS.—

In both cohorts, there was significant enrichment of P+LD morphology in PDACs with KRAS G12V and G12R compared with G12D. In the entire combined cohort, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed longer overall survival (OS) with KRAS G12R as compared with G12D (median OS of 1255 versus 682 days, P = .03) and in patients whose PDACs displayed P+LD morphology as compared with conventional morphology (median OS of 1175 versus 684 days, P = .04). In the adjuvant-only subset, KRAS G12R had the longest OS compared with G12D, G12V, and other alleles (median OS unreached/undefined versus 1009, 1129, and 1222 days, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS.—

PDACs with different mutant KRAS alleles are associated with distinct morphologies and clinical outcomes, with KRAS G12R allele associated with P+LD morphology and longer OS when compared with G12D using Kaplan-Meier studies.

Sex-Related Differences in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression and Response to Therapy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most deadly malignancies with an increasing incidence rate and limited therapeutic options. Biological sex has an impact on many aspects of PDAC development and response to therapy, yet it is highly unappreciated in both basic and translational research, and worryingly in PDAC clinical trials. In this review, we summarize how biological sex influences PDAC incidence and mortality, genetic and epigenetic landscapes, anti-tumor immunity, responses to hormones, cachexia, and the efficacy of therapy. We highlight the importance of sex as a variable and discuss how to implement it into preclinical and clinical research. These considerations should be of use to researchers aiming at improving understanding of PDAC biology and developing precision medicine therapeutic strategies.

Novel Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) unfortunately remains a highly fatal disease with a 5-year survival rate of only 11%. If surgical resection is not possible, systemic chemotherapy represents the standard-of-care approach to management. Combination chemotherapy regimens using fluorouracil (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and irinotecan; and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or gemcitabine with albumin-bound paclitaxel have the potential to improve overall survival for patients with advanced disease. With the increasing understanding of the molecular drivers of pancreatic cancer, novel therapeutic approaches have made incremental progress for these patients. The molecular landscape of PDAC has been studied extensively. Approximately 90% of PDACs harbor mutations in the KRAS gene, a driver mutation that has long been considered undruggable. However, novel KRAS inhibitors have shown therapeutic promise in early-phase clinical trials, with larger studies ongoing. Less frequently encountered genomic aberrations that have therapeutic potential include NRG, BRAF, NTRK, HER2, BRCA, PALB2, and claudin. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have unfortunately yielded disappointing efficacy for the majority of patients with pancreatic cancer, except for those with tumors exhibiting deficiency in mismatch repair proteins. Alternative approaches to incorporate immunotherapy have shown more promise such as use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for selected patients in the maintenance setting and potential vaccine therapies in the postsurgery adjuvant setting. It is vital to perform molecular profiling in all patients with PDAC to identify potential treatment targets, and to enroll patients in clinical trials whenever possible.

Spatial interactions of immune cells as potential predictors to efficacy of toripalimab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a phase Ib/II trial

Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis. Immunotherapy alone offers limited efficacy, but it is still unknown whether its combination with chemotherapy could offer synergistic anti-tumor effects. This phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining toripalimab with the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) regimen as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC and explored predictive biomarkers (ChiCTR2000032293). The primary endpoints were safety and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Immune-related biomarkers including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, genetic status, cytokine levels, and spatial features of the tumor immune microenviroment (TIME) were investigated. Neither serious treatment-related adverse events nor grade 4 immune-related adverse events were reported. Among the 72 patients, the median OS was 8.9 months, 12-month OS rate was 31.9%, with median PFS of 5.6 months, ORR of 33.3%, and DCR of 90.3%. Higher PD-L1 expression, without liver metastases were associated with higher ORR, however these factors could not effectively distinguish responders and non-responders. Importantly, dendritic cells - T helper cells - cytotoxic T lymphocytes (DC-Th-CTL) enriched immune niche and their spatial interactions were dominant predictors of response based on TIME analysis using a cyclic multiplex tissue staining assay, with an area under the curve value of 0.8. Overall, GnP plus toripalimab exhibited good safety and differentiated efficacy in selected population, and the spatial interactions of DC-Th-CTL represent promising predictors to efficacy of immunochemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic PDAC.

Effectiveness and Safety of Irreversible Electroporation When Used for the Ablation of Stage 3 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Initial Results from the DIRECT Registry Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Overall survival for patients with Stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains limited, with a median survival of 12 to 15 months. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a local tumor ablation method that induces cancerous cell death by disrupting cell membrane homeostasis. The DIRECT Registry study was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of IRE when combined with standard of care (SOC) treatment for Stage 3 PDAC versus SOC alone in a real-world setting after at least 3 months of induction chemotherapy; Methods: Patients with Stage 3 PDAC treated with IRE plus SOC or SOC alone were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter registry study. Enrollment required 3 months of active multi-agent chemotherapy with no progression before enrollment. Endpoints were 30- and 90-day mortality and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Eighty-seven IRE and 27 SOC subjects were enrolled in the registry. Mean ages were 64.0 ± 8.4 and 66.4 ± 9.9 years, and mean anterior/posterior tumor diameters were 2.2 ± 0.7 cm and 3.2 ± 1.3 for the IRE and SOC groups respectively (p = 0.0066). All IRE procedures were performed using an open approach. The 90-day all-cause mortality was 5/83 (6.0%) and 2/27 (7.4%) for the IRE and SOC groups, respectively. Two subjects in the IRE group died from treatment-related complications, and one patient in the SOC group died due to chemotherapy-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial results from the DIRECT registry study indicate the use of IRE for curative intent tumor ablation in combination with induction chemotherapy has equivalent morbidity and mortality rates when compared to standard-of-care chemotherapy alone.

Variability of quality-of-life measurements and reporting in randomised controlled trials of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodology used in pancreatic cancer (PC) randomised controlled trials (RCTs) measuring quality of life (QOL) and focuses on the type, frequency, survey compliance and duration of these assessments.

DESIGN

Systematic review of PC RCTs measuring QOL.

DATA SOURCES

A search of PubMed.gov and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for PC RCTs measuring QOL from inception to 21 March 2023. Only phase III RCTs were included. Studies were excluded if QOL was not measured, the study was phase I/II, in the second-line setting or unavailable in English. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers in a standardised fashion.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes included the type of QOL instrument used, the timing and frequency of assessments, methods of analysis and survey completion rates (SCRs) over time. Secondary outcomes included patient demographics, significant QOL improvements and the frequency of trials measuring QOL.

RESULTS

Out of 269 studies screened, 54 RCTs were identified, and 24 measured QOL (involving 11 229 patients). Instruments used included the EORTC QLQ-C30 (n=15), FACT-HEP (n=3), Spitzer-QOL-Index (n=2), EQ-5D (n=2), LASA (n=1) and FACT-PA (n=1). Most trials assessed QOL until disease progression or death (10/24), with 4-week intervals being the most common (7/24). SCRs were reported in 15/24 trials, with disease stage influencing SCRs over time. In trials with metastatic, locally advanced/metastatic, and resectable disease, the median times to reach a 50% response rate-defined as the point where the number of surveys completed was half of the enrolled participants-were 12.41 weeks (n=2), 14.14 weeks (n=10), and 54.2 weeks (n=3), respectively." Only 2/24 trials reported significant QOL improvements between treatment arms. Patient age was reported in all trials, while race/ethnicity was only reported in 4/24 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability exists in the timing, methods and reporting of QOL assessments in PC trials. There is a need for further research to assess the implications of missing data and consider the temporality of QOL assessment in patients with advanced cancers and poor prognosis.