Nerve injuries associated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis

Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar nerve anatomy in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Ulnar nerve instability has been reported in up to 17% of children. Accurate assessment is important to achieve because of potential nerve complications that can arise from treatment of common pediatric fractures, including supracondylar humerus fractures. The objective of our study was to evaluate our ability to use ultrasonography to determine the extent of ulnar nerve dislocation in the normal pediatric population and to determine if there is a relationship between ulnar nerve instability and ligamentous laxity.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective ultrasound evaluation of 51 children, examining the excursion of the ulnar nerve through full range of motion. On the basis of its movement during flexion, the ulnar nerve was categorized as stable, subluxating, or dislocating. In addition, we assessed all subjects for ligamentous laxity using the Wynne-Davies signs of joint laxity. The subjects were then divided into groups based on age or ligamentous laxity, and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Most of the elbows evaluated had stable ulnar nerves (64/102, 62.7%), 27.5% (28/102) had subluxating nerves, and 9.8% (10/102) had dislocating nerves. Patients aged between 6 and 10 showed the highest rate of dislocating or subluxating nerves, with 50%, and also the highest average laxity score, 2.0. When grouped according to ligamentous laxity, patients who had multiple signs of ligamentous laxity had statistically higher numbers of subluxating and dislocating nerves (91.6%, 11/12) than those with lower laxity scores (25.6%, 10/39).

CONCLUSIONS

There are a substantial number of subluxating or dislocating ulnar nerves in children, and the incidence is often bilateral. Patients with ligamentous laxity are more likely to possess unstable ulnar nerves. Ultrasound evaluation and assessment of ligamentous laxity are additional tools that can be used to assess elbow anatomy and identify children at risk for iatrogenic nerve injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Documentation of neurovascular status in supracondylar fractures and the development of an assessment proforma

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar fractures are associated with a high incidence of neurovascular complications. Comprehensive clinical evaluation is a necessity when children with these injuries present to the emergency department. Neurovascular assessment can be difficult due to pain, anxiety and the young age of these patients; however, it is crucial findings are well documented to identify patients requiring urgent surgical intervention, in addition to allowing the neurovascular status to be monitored over time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preoperative neurovascular documentation in children presenting with displaced supracondylar fractures and devise an emergency department assessment proforma to facilitate comprehensive evaluation.

METHODS

A retrospective case-note review was performed on patients with Gartland grades 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures observed in a 2-year period from July 2008 to July 2010.

RESULTS

137 patients were included; only 12 patients (8.8%) and 19 patients (13.9%), respectively, had a complete preoperative neurological or vascular assessment documented. Regarding the individual nerves, 59 (43.1%) patients had median nerve integrity documented, 55 (40.1%) ulnar nerve and 49 (35.8%) radial nerve integrity documented. Only 18 patients (13.1%) had their anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) function documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative documentation of neurovascular status in children with displaced supracondylar fractures was poor. Documentation of AIN examination was particularly poor. The introduction of a proforma (Liverpool upper limb fracture assessment) is proposed to increase documentation of neurovascular assessment and optimise emergency department evaluation of children presenting with upper limb injuries.

Neurological status in paediatric upper limb injuries in the emergency department--current practice

Background

In upper limb injuries it is important to assess associated neurological injury. The aim of this study was to assess the initial (Emergency Department (ED)) documentation of neurological status in paediatric patients presenting with upper limb injuries.

Findings

Case notes of paediatric patients admitted to the orthopaedic ward with upper limb injuries were retrospectively collected over a three month period. Initial ED documentation was recorded and case notes examined for any neurological deficit on admission. Of the 121 patients, 107 (88.4%) of case notes had some form of neurological documentation. The remaining case notes (n = 14, 11.6%) had no mention of neurological examination. There were 10 (8.2%) patients with pre-operative neurological deficits identified; none of these had been previously identified by the ED.

Conclusion

There are failings of neurological documentation on the part of ED staff. It is likely that these reflect a knowledge deficit in the examination of the injured upper limb in paediatric patients.

Treatment of displaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture patterns requiring medial fixation: a reliable and safer cross-pinning technique

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of displaced Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children may include closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The pin configuration may be all-lateral entry or cross-pin. Despite the improved stability possible with cross-pinning, there is an inherent iatrogenic risk to the ulnar nerve of about 6%. As medial fixation may be necessary for certain fracture patterns, this study was conducted to evaluate the risk of ulnar neuropathy using a technique here described and developed to minimize injury to this structure.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all children treated for a supracondylar humerus fracture at our institution between 2003 and 2010. All the type 3 displaced fractures were placed into 2 groups: lateral-entry pinning and cross-pinning. The 2 groups were then compared for risk of ulnar nerve injury, and a post hoc power analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 381 supracondylar humerus fractures met the inclusion criteria. Our cross-pinning technique was used in 187 (49%) of the children with a mean age of 5.8 years (range, 0.92 to 13.92 y). There were 4 ulnar nerve injuries in the entire cohort and 2 sustained as iatrogenic injuries in the cross-pinning group (1.1%). There was no significant difference between our 2 groups in regard to risk of ulnar nerve injury (P=0.24). There is a statistically significant lower risk of ulnar nerve injury in our cross-pinning technique than previously described techniques (P=0.0028), with a post hoc power analysis of 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the inherent risk for iatrogenic nerve injury with cross-pinning completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, there is often a need to use this technique to improve fixation and stability of the fracture. Our method of cross-pinning is safe and reproducible for providing fracture stability with a significant decrease in the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury (1 in 94) when a medial pin is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic studies.

Changing practice patterns: the impact of a randomized clinical trial on surgeons preference for treatment of type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

A recent prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) for comparison of medial and lateral entry pins with lateral entry pins for treatment of Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) was published, validating the national trend toward treatment of this injury with only lateral entry pins. But have surgeons actually changed their practice as a result of these recent data? The purpose of this study was to compare pin configuration, loss of reduction and rate of nerve injuries before and after the RCT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with Gartland type 3 SCHF who were treated before the RCT (April 2000 to April 2003: 141 patients) and after the trial (April 2006 to April 2009: 126 patients). Eight surgeons were included. Patient demographic data, pin configuration, neurovascular status, and radiographic results were compared. Comparisons between the pretrial cohort and the posttrial cohort as a group as well as for each individual surgeon were performed. Comparisons included the choice of pin configuration, incidence of loss of radiographic reduction, iatrogenic nerve injuries, return to the operating room, and infection before and after the clinical trial.

RESULTS

There was a statistically different pin configuration in the pretrial group compared with the posttrial group (P<0.0001) with the posttrial group having a much higher percentage of bicolumnar lateral entry only pins. Five out of 8 surgeons individually had a statistically significant change in their practice pattern for pin configuration. There was no difference from pretrial to posttrial in loss of radiographic reduction, infection rate, iatrogenic nerve injuries, or return to the operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

Data showing change in surgeon practice have been relatively sparse. In this group of surgeons who participated in an RCT, there was a statistically significant change in pin configuration for treatment of Gartland type 3 SCHF after the results of the RCT were known. The change in clinical practice did not have an effect on outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Parent and Patient Satisfaction after Treatment for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in 139 Children: No Difference between Skeletal Traction and Crossed Pin Fixation at Long-Term Followup

Aim. The aim of this study was to see whether the benefits of crossed wire fixation over skeletal traction in the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) were mirrored in the children's or their caregivers' rating of the experience. Methods. As part of a study of the clinical outcome of SCHF, all the patients and the parents were asked to rate their experience of the treatment on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results. There was no difference in the patients' or the parents' experience between the treatment groups. However there was a difference between the parents with children who experienced a neurovascular complication (mean VAS 6.1) and those that did not (mean VAS 4.3, P = 0.03). The boys rated the experience as less negative (mean VAS 3.6) than the girls (mean VAS 4.7, P = 0.02). Conclusion. In the long term, avoiding complications was more important to the parents than the choice of treatment for SCHF in the children.

A retrospective analysis of loss of reduction in operated supracondylar humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Loss of reduction following closed or open reduction of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children varies widely and is considered dependent on stability of the fracture pattern, Gartland type, number and configuration of pins for fixation, technical errors, adequacy of initial reduction, and timing of the surgery. This study was aimed to evaluate the factors responsible for failure of reduction in operated pediatric supracondylar fracture humerus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed loss of reduction by evaluating changes in Baumann's angle, change in lateral rotation percentage, and anterior humeral line in 77 consecutive children who were treated with multiple Kirschner wire fixation and were available for followup. The intraoperative radiographs were compared with those taken immediately after surgery and 3 weeks postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by STATA 10.

RESULTS

Reduction was lost in 18.2% of the patients. Technical errors were significantly higher in those who lost reduction (P = 0.001; Odds Ratio: 57.63). Lateral pins had a significantly higher risk of losing reduction than cross pins (P = 0.029; Odds Ratio: 7.73). Other factors including stability of fracture configuration were not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The stability of fracture fixation in supracondylar fractures in children is dependent on a technically good pinning. Cross pinning provides a more stable fixation than lateral entry pins. Fracture pattern and accuracy of reduction were not important factors in determining the stability of fixation.

Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ulnar nerve injury may occur after pinning of supracondylar fractures in children. We describe the outcome and compare the rates of iatrogenic injuries to the ulnar nerve in a consecutive series of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children treated with either crossed pinning or antegrade nailing.

METHODS

Medical charts of all children sustaining this fracture treated at our department between 1994 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed regarding the mode of treatment, demographic data including age and sex, the time until implant removal, the outcome, and the rate of ulnar nerve injuries.

RESULTS

503 children (55% boys) with an average age of 6.5 years sustained a type-II, type-III, or type-IV supracondylar fracture. Of those, 440 children were included in the study. Antegrade nailing was performed in 264 (60%) of the children, and the others were treated with crossed pins. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury occurred in 0.4% of the children treated with antegrade nailing and in 15% of the children treated with crossed pinning. After median 3 (1.6-12) years of follow-up, the clinical outcome was good and similar between the 2 groups.

INTERPRETATION

Intramedullary antegrade nailing of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures can be considered an adequate and safe alternative to the widely performed crossed K-wire fixation. The risk of iatrogenic nerve injury after antegrade nailing is small compared to that after crossed pinning.

The treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in children

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children. In case of displacement and instability, the standard procedure is closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. As Kirschner wire fixation requires postoperative cast immobilization, does not allow early mobilization, and is associated with the risk of damage of the ulnar nerve, innovative techniques should be evaluated. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess both radiologic and functional outcome of supracondylar humeral fractures treated by elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in a large pediatric cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective review of children who underwent closed reduction and ESIN of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in our institution between 2001 and 2009.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven children (mean age 6.1 y) with types II (60.6%), III (23.6%), and IV (15.7%) fractures according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) Pediatric Comprehensive Classification were included. One hundred and eighteen patients (92.9%) had healing of fracture without any limitation in range of motion and 9 patients (7.1%) had some minor degree of long-term functional deficit (7 children with flexion and 2 with extension deficit). Two children had clinical cubitus varus deformity. No iatrogenic damage to the ulnar nerve occurred and no secondary reduction or a change of surgical strategy was necessary. Postoperative radiologic evaluation showed antecurvation in 1 case, recurvation in 3 cases, as well as cubitus varus deformity and rotation deformity in 1 child each.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade ESIN is a technique suitable for all types of supracondylar humeral fractures with good functional results. The advantages include the avoidance of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, low rates of cubitus varus, cast-free treatment, and the possibility to evaluate clinical motion at all times postoperatively. Although biased toward milder forms of supracondylar fractures, our data clearly suggest that if closed reduction is possible, intramedullary nailing in these children is more than an alternative to Kirschner wire fixation as the standard procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.