The Total Neuropathy Score as an assessment tool for grading the course of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: comparison with the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Scale

Management of treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is one of the most important complications of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. PN can be caused by MM itself, either by the effects of the monoclonal protein or in the form of radiculopathy from direct compression, and particularly by certain therapies, including bortezomib, thalidomide, vinca alkaloids and cisplatin. Clinical evaluation has shown that up to 20% of MM patients have PN at diagnosis and as many as 75% may experience treatment-emergent PN during therapy. The incidence, symptoms, reversibility, predisposing factors and etiology of treatment-emergent PN vary among MM therapies, with PN incidence also affected by the dose, schedule and combinations of potentially neurotoxic agents. Effective management of treatment-emergent PN is critical to minimize the incidence and severity of this complication, while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Herein, the state of knowledge regarding treatment-emergent PN in MM patients and current management practices are outlined, and recommendations regarding optimal strategies for PN management during MM treatment are provided. These strategies include early and regular monitoring with neurological evaluation, with dose modification and treatment discontinuation as indicated. Areas requiring further research include the development of MM-specific, patient-focused assessment tools, pharmacogenomic analysis of patient DNA, and trials to assess the efficacy of pharmacological interventions.

Impact of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: a patient perspective

INTRODUCTION

Dose-limiting neurotoxicity is a major side effect of oxaliplatin treatment, producing initial acute neurotoxicity and chronic neuropathy with increasing exposure. The improvement in survival for patients with early-stage colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin has highlighted the need for valid and reliable assessment of peripheral neuropathy.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this paper was to explore neuropathic symptoms in oxaliplatin-treated patients as assessed using different methods.

METHODS

Consecutive symptomatic patients reporting peripheral neuropathy after oxaliplatin chemotherapy for colorectal cancer were interviewed using a semi-structured clinical interview. Neurotoxicity was also assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria scale (clinician-rated), patient 'self-report' questionnaires (PNQ), nerve conduction and clinical assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were assessed, 12.6 ± 2.8 months after treatment cessation (mean cumulative oxaliplatin dose, 789 mg/m(2)). In 40% of patients, neurotoxicity necessitated early cessation of treatment. Only 10% of patients were designated by clinicians with severe neurotoxicity, whilst, in contrast, patient interviews and self-report questionnaires described significant physical limitations due to neuropathic symptoms in 60% of patients. The majority (85%) of patients had objective evidence of sensory neuropathy with nerve conduction studies. Reports from clinical interviews were strongly correlated with patient self-assessment (Pearson coefficient = 0.790, p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Given the discrepancies in symptom prevalence highlighted by these findings, the monitoring of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity would benefit from more informative clinical assessment, with inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures. Such an approach would be beneficial in a clinical trial setting to monitor the efficacy of interventions and in prospective studies of survivorship to determine the true burden of peripheral neuropathy in oxaliplatin-treated patients.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity can be misdiagnosed by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity scale

The assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is still uncertain as several of the most frequently used scales do not rely on a formal neurological evaluation and depend on patients' reports and examiners' interpretations. The aim of this study was to compare the assessment of CIPN using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) scale and a formal neurological assessment scored with the Total Neuropathy Score (TNS, i.e., a composite scale designed to grade the impairment in neuropathy patients) to identify possible discrepancies in the diagnosis. In this prospective study, 155 patients treated with cisplatin/carboplatin or with paclitaxel/docetaxel and CIPN were examined in a collaborative oncological/neurological multi-center trial using the NCI-CTC scale and the TNS; the results were then extensively compared. We evidenced that the TNS allows possible misdiagnosed neuropathies to be revealed. In fact, the NCI-CTC evaluation performed by experienced examiners overestimated the occurrence of motor neuropathy, possibly because of the presence of confounding factors (e.g., fatigue, depression, cachexia), which might be difficult to be ruled out without a formal neurological examination. This study strongly indicates that a more formal neurological assessment of patients with CIPN than that achievable with the common toxicity scales (e.g., NCI-CTC) is advisable.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients

Chemotherapy forms the backbone of treatment for many types of pediatric cancers, but a main side effect of treatment is chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Damage to the peripheral nervous system by chemotherapeutic agents can occur at the axon, cell body, or myelin level, and the mechanism of damage differs based on the specific chemotherapeutic agent used. This review provides background on the current knowledge of pathophysiology, assessment, and intervention for CIPN, focusing specifically on issues relevant in pediatric cancers patients. Although specific, standardized measures of CIPN are available for adults, such measures are limited for use in the pediatric populations. Likewise, clinical trials for prevention and treatment of this neuropathy and related symptoms are rare in pediatrics, but some information can be gained from the basic and adult literature.

Pain, neuropathic symptoms, and physical and mental well-being in persons with cancer

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain is present in at least 25-40% of people with cancer pain and is thought to be more difficult to control than other types of cancer related pain.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore differences in the experience of cancer patients who describe their pain using neuropathic descriptors compared to those who do not.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of data from 234 outpatients from a large NCI designated cancer center in west, central Florida was conducted to identify differences in pain, pain interference, symptoms, health related quality of life, and depression between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients with numbness, tingling, or electric-like sensations reported higher levels of current pain (p= .001), pain at its worst (p= .001), pain on average (p= .019), pain at its least (p= .008), and pain interference (p< .001). They reported problems with dizziness/lightheadedness significantly more often (p=.004) and also reported more severe problems with concentration (p=.047), poorer physical (p=.019) and mental health (p=.024), although no differences in depressive symptoms were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that cancer patients with numbness, tingling, or electric-like sensations have significantly higher levels of pain and pain interference, and lower health related quality of life than do patients without these symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

These results highlight the ongoing need for research evaluating methods of treating neuropathic pain; education regarding assessment and management of neuropathic pain; and aggressive efforts to relieve neuropathic pain in oncology settings.

Epothilone-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review of current knowledge

CONTEXT

Epothilones, belonging to the family of microtubule stabilizing agents, have shown prolonged remissions and improved survival in various types of refractory, treatment-resistant cancer. Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) is the main representative of these compounds. Peripheral neuropathy is a significant toxicity of epothilones, eventually resulting in dose modification and changes in the treatment plan.

OBJECTIVES

This review critically looks at the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and management of epothilone-induced peripheral neuropathy (EIPN). We also highlight areas of future research to pursue.

METHODS

References were identified by searches of PubMed from 2000 until December 2010 with related terms.

RESULTS

The mechanism underlying EIPN remains rather unclear. Damage to the ganglion soma cells and peripheral axons through disruption of microtubules of the mitotic spindle and by interference with the axonal transport in the affected neurons may significantly contribute to the pathogenesis of EIPN. As a result, epothilones primarily produce an axonal, dose-dependent, sensory distal peripheral neuropathy, which is reversible in most cases on discontinuation of treatment. The incidence of EIPN is mainly related to risk factors, including cumulative dose and probably pre-existing neuropathy. To date, apart from the use of dose reduction and schedule change algorithm, there is no effective treatment with neuroprotective agents for EIPN.

CONCLUSION

EIPN remains a very challenging area in the field of toxic neuropathies. As such, there is a need for further preclinical and prospective clinical studies to elucidate the pathogenesis of EIPN and provide further robust evidence on its incidence, course, and reversibility.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: prevention and treatment

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, dose-limiting side effect of many chemotherapeutic agents. Although many therapies have been investigated for the prevention and/or treatment of CIPN, there is no well-accepted proven therapy. In addition, there is no universally accepted, well-validated measure for the assessment of CIPN. The agents for which there are the strongest preliminary data regarding their potential efficacy in preventing CIPN are intravenous calcium and magnesium (Ca/Mg) infusions and glutathione. Agents with the strongest supporting evidence for efficacy in the treatment of CIPN include topical pain relievers, such as baclofen/amitriptyline/ketamine gel, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, such as venlafaxine and duloxetine. Other promising therapies are also reviewed in this paper. Cutaneous electrostimulation is a nonpharmacological therapy that appears, from an early pilot trial, to be potentially effective in the treatment of CIPN. Finally, there is a lack of evidence of effective treatments for the paclitaxel acute pain syndrome (P-APS), which appears to be caused by neurologic injury.

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy

OPINION STATEMENT

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is one of the most severe and unpredictable side effects of modern anticancer treatment. In recent years, a clear understanding of the importance of an integrated approach to CIPN has become evident, and efforts are increasing to better characterize its features and to identify more accurate methods to report and grade its occurrence. The clinically relevant impact of CIPN on cancer patients has been known for a long time, but knowledge of its pathogenetic aspects is still very limited. This incomplete knowledge is one of the major limitations in identifying targets for evidence-based neuroprotective strategies. Nevertheless, several studies have been devoted to the prevention or at least the effective treatment of symptoms secondary to peripheral nerve damage and to the early identification of patients at high risk of developing severe CIPN. Unfortunately, none of these studies has been successful and the optimal management of CIPN patients is still an unmet clinical need. Therefore, the modification of chemotherapy is currently the only available approach to limit the severity of neuropathy in the vast majority of patients. The indications for treatment modification are not universally accepted and they can differ among the various drugs. Generally, treatment modification should be considered as soon as symptoms and signs impair the daily life activities of the patient, but the possibility of a delayed worsening of CIPN after treatment withdrawal ("coasting") should always be considered, and delay of modification decisions should be avoided.

Measures of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review of psychometric properties

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) remains the principal dose-limiting toxicity of many agents. This systematic review evaluates available CIPN measures and provides rationale for selection of measures in this field. Searches of Medline (1966-2010), CINAHL (1966-2010), Embase (1966-2010), and Cochrane (1988-2010) databases were performed. To be selected, studies had to include (1) subjects receiving peripheral neurotoxic chemotherapy for cancer and (2) a primary purpose of psychometric evaluation of CIPN measures. A modified Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool coded psychometric study quality, with 0-7 score overall possible (higher score indicating better quality). A total of 15 studies qualified for evaluation. Overall studies were of moderate quality, with 10 of 15 receiving a 4-5 QUADAS score. Averaged quality scores for two repeatedly studied measures, Total Neuropathy Score (TNS) versions and Functional Assessment of Cancer-Gynecologic Oncology Group, neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx), were 5.4 and 4.5, respectively. Two measures emerged as potentially useful for clinical trials and patient care. The FACT/GOG-Ntx is a subjective measure of CIPN-related quality of life (QoL). TNS clinical versions incorporate both subjective measures and objective examinations of nerve function. However, to improve QUADAS scoring, additional research is needed focusing on other psychometric aspects such as responsiveness of CIPN outcome measures.

Peripheral neuropathy with microtubule-targeting agents: occurrence and management approach

Microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs), which include vinca alkaloids, taxanes, and the recently introduced epothilone, ixabepilone, are widely used chemotherapeutic agents for treatment of patients with cancer. MTAs interfere with the normal structure and function of microtubules, leading to cell-cycle arrest and tumor cell death. Microtubule function is critical to normal neuronal function, thus MTA therapy is commonly associated with some form of neuropathy. There is poor agreement between tools for clinical assessment of MTA-associated peripheral neuropathy, and standardization of grading scales is needed to reduce variability. For a majority of patients, MTA-associated neuropathy is mild to moderate in intensity and reversible, but it can be severe and resolve incompletely. The incidence and severity of MTA-associated neuropathy is drug, dose, and schedule dependent. The first-generation vinca alkaloids (eg, vincristine) are associated with severe mixed sensory and motor neuropathy, whereas the newer vinca alkaloids (eg, vinorelbine, vinflunine) induce a milder sensory neuropathy. Taxane-associated sensory neuropathy occurs more often with standard (polyoxyethylated castor oil-based) and albumin-bound paclitaxel than with docetaxel. The incidence and presentation of peripheral neuropathy with ixabepilone, alone or in combination with capecitabine, are similar to that with taxanes. Management of neuropathy may involve reducing or delaying the MTA dose, or in severe persistent or disabling cases discontinuing treatment. Reversal of neuropathy after dosage intervention appears to be more rapid with ixabepilone than with other MTAs.

Long-term neuropathy after oxaliplatin treatment: challenging the dictum of reversibility

OBJECTIVES

Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy is a significant and dose-limiting toxicity that adversely affects quality of life. However, the long-term neurological sequelae have not been adequately described. The present study aimed to describe the natural history of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, using subjective and objective assessments.

METHODS

From a population of 108 oxaliplatin-treated patients referred for neurological assessment in 2002-2008, 52.2% of the surviving patient cohort (n = 24) was available for follow-up at a median of 25 months post-oxaliplatin. Patients underwent a protocol that incorporated clinical assessment scales, patient questionnaires, standard electrodiagnostic assessments, and novel nerve excitability studies to precisely assess nerve function.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 79.2% of patients reported residual neuropathic symptoms, with distal loss of pin-prick sensibility in 58.3% of patients and loss of vibration sensibility in 83.3% of patients. Symptom severity scores were significantly correlated with cumulative dose. There was no recovery of sensory action potential amplitudes in upper and lower limbs, consistent with persistent axonal sensory neuropathy. Sensory excitability parameters had not returned to baseline levels, suggesting persisting abnormalities in nerve function. The extent of excitability abnormalities during treatment was significantly correlated with clinical outcomes at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings establish the persistence of subjective and objective deficits in oxaliplatin-treated patients post-oxaliplatin, suggesting that sensory neuropathy is a long-term outcome, thereby challenging the literature on the reversibility of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy.

Early, progressive, and sustained dysfunction of sensory axons underlies paclitaxel-induced neuropathy

Paclitaxel is used in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. It induces disabling and potentially long-lasting sensory neuropathy. This study systematically and prospectively investigated sensory function, using clinical grading scales, quantitative sensory testing, and neurophysiological and nerve excitability studies in 28 patients with early-stage breast cancer. After administration of 529 ± 41 mg/m(2) paclitaxel, 71% of patients developed neuropathic symptoms by 6 weeks of treatment. Early and progressive increases in stimulus threshold (P < 0.05) and reduction in sensory amplitudes from 47.0 ± 3.3 μV to 42.4 ± 3.4 μV (P < 0.05) occurred by 4 weeks, with a further reduction by final treatment (33.7 ± 3.0 μV, P < 0.001). The majority of patients (63%) did not experience recovery of neuropathic symptoms at follow-up. Axonal disruption did not relate to membrane conductance dysfunction. We found that paclitaxel produces early sensory dysfunction and leads to persistent neuropathy. Importantly, significant axonal dysfunction within the first month of treatment predated symptom onset, suggesting a window for neuroprotective therapies.

Peripheral neuropathy during bortezomib treatment of multiple myeloma: a review of recent studies

Treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy (PN) is an important dose-limiting toxicity during treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib-induced PN (BIPN) occurred in 37-44% of clinical trial patients with MM, with the cumulative treatment dose as its single most significant predictor. This review discusses the clinical profile of BIPN in the treatment of MM and guidelines for its management. Lower rates of BIPN observed during treatment of solid tumors compared with rates of hematologic cancers are also discussed. Several areas of research are reviewed that may improve the management of BIPN, including co-therapies with the novel heat shock protein inhibitor tanespimycin, which appears to reduce the incidence of BIPN, and recent studies with second-generation proteasome inhibitors such as carfilzomib and NPI-0052. Adherence to the National Cancer Institute dose-modification algorithm is the most effective method for mitigating BIPN. Reversal of BIPN after treatment cessation occurs in most cases, but recovery in some patients takes as long as 1.7 years, and some individuals fail to return to baseline neurologic function. BIPN can cause a significant reduction in quality of life, primarily due to severe treatment-emergent pain. Ongoing research may provide additional information about the mechanism of BIPN and strategies to reduce PN.

Management of peripheral neuropathy caused by microtubule inhibitors

Any patient receiving an agent that targets microtubules (e.g., taxanes, vinca alkaloids, epothilones) is at some risk for encountering peripheral neuropathy. This article provides tools and discussion to aid nurses in managing peripheral neuropathy in their patients through early identification and education. Some patients are at higher risk than others based on their chemotherapeutic regimen, pretreatment history, and comorbidities. When interacting with at-risk patients, nurses should be alert for primarily sensory neuropathy that presents as loss of sensation, numbness, or tingling, beginning at the distal ends of the extremities and moving proximally with a stocking or glove distribution. Clinical assessments for neuropathy generally employ grading scales, questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing, and psychometric assessments; each has benefits and limitations. Patients who experience moderate or severe neuropathy may require a dose reduction or delay until symptoms resolve; these patients may need a lower dose for the next treatment cycle. No known agents have proven to prevent or treat severe neuropathy more effectively than regular neurologic examinations, early intervention, and patient education. In this respect, nurses can make a substantial difference in the impact of neuropathy on treatment efficacy and patients' quality of life.

Peripheral neuropathy in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common form of cancer in children. Recent advances in treatment have led to dramatically improved survival rates. Standard ALL treatment includes multiple administrations of the chemotherapeutic drug vincristine, which is a known neurotoxic agent. Although peripheral neuropathy is a well-known toxicity among children receiving vincristine acutely, the long-term effects on the peripheral nervous system in these children are not clear. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of neuropathy and its impact on motor function and quality of life (QOL) among children who survived ALL. Thirty-seven survivors of childhood ALL aged 8-18 underwent evaluation for neuropathy through self-reported symptoms, standardized examinations, and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Functional impact of neuropathy was assessed using the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2). QOL was assessed using the PedsQL. Nerve conduction study abnormalities were seen in 29.7% of children who were longer than 2 years off therapy for ALL. Most children with an abnormal examination or NCS did not have subjective symptoms. Although overall motor function was below population norms on the BOT-2, presence of neuropathy did not significantly correlate with motor functional status or QOL.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity assessment: a critical revision of the currently available tools

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a frequent, potentially severe and dose-limiting side-effect of cancer treatment. Despite its clinical relevance that limits the use of several antineoplastic agents and even the future development of new anticancer drugs, several crucial aspects of CIPN remain unsolved, one of which is how to assess its occurrence and severity in the most effective and reliable way. CIPN severity is generally assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) scales, although it is well known that significant inter-observer disagreement exists using these scales. Moreover, most CTC scores mix impairment, disability and quality of life measures, which could lead to misinterpretation of the results and unpredictable under- or overestimation of the effect. This uncertainty may lead to different interpretations of the results of the same clinical trials by clinicians and also by regulatory agencies. The use of other types of scale based on clinical and instrumental examinations, or the use of self-administered questionnaires for patients, has not yet really improved the accuracy of CIPN assessment, although some of these tools are promising and deserve to be further validated. As a result, there is a general recognition that CIPN has still not been properly assessed and that improvements should be made. In this review, the available data regarding the different tools used to assess CIPN will be revised and their features will be critically examined, with a special focus on their reliability and reproducibility across examiners and, when available, through direct comparison.

Dealing with neuropathy in plasma-cell dyscrasias

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a frequent complication of plasma-cell dyscrasias such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, multiple myeloma, Waldenström's disease, POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes) syndrome, Castleman's disease, and light-chain amyloidosis. PN can be associated with the underlying disease or it can related to the treatment. The novel immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have changed the standard treatment of multiple myeloma. Treatment-related PN induced by thalidomide (TiPN) or bortezomib (BiPN) has become the most frequent cause of symptomatic polyneuropathy in multiple myeloma and related diseases. Dealing with PN has become a major challenge in current clinical practice for multiple myeloma patients. This review deals with practical issues such as etiology, incidence, symptoms, and clinical management of treatment-emergent PN. The major focus of the hematologist should be on the prevention of PN, primarily by frequent monitoring of the patient and by timely and adequate dose reduction of thalidomide and bortezomib. Thalidomide should not be given for periods longer than 18 months, and if it is, then patients should be carefully monitored with a low threshold for discontinuation in the face of any emergent neuropathy. In the case of BiPN, the dose of bortezomib should be reduced and/or the administration interval should be prolonged from biweekly to weekly. Adequate pain management and supportive care require a multidisciplinary approach involving the treating physician, expert nursing staff, and a neurologist as clinically indicated.

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity: changes in axonal excitability precede development of neuropathy

Administration of oxaliplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapy used extensively in the treatment of colorectal cancer, is complicated by prominent dose-limiting neurotoxicity. Acute neurotoxicity develops following oxaliplatin infusion and resolves within days, while chronic neuropathy develops progressively with higher cumulative doses. To investigate the pathophysiology of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and neuropathy, clinical grading scales, nerve conduction studies and a total of 905 axonal excitability studies were undertaken in a cohort of 58 consecutive oxaliplatin-treated patients. Acutely following individual oxaliplatin infusions, significant changes were evident in both sensory and motor axons in recovery cycle parameters (P < 0.05), consistent with the development of a functional channelopathy of axonal sodium channels. Longitudinally across treatment (cumulative oxaliplatin dose 776 +/- 46 mg/m(2)), progressive abnormalities developed in sensory axons (refractoriness P < or = 0.001; superexcitability P < 0.001; hyperpolarizing threshold electrotonus 90-100 ms P < or = 0.001), while motor axonal excitability remained unchanged (P > 0.05), consistent with the purely sensory symptoms of chronic oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. Sensory abnormalities occurred prior to significant reduction in compound sensory amplitude and the development of neuropathy (P < 0.01). Sensory excitability abnormalities that developed during early treatment cycles (cumulative dose 294 +/- 16 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin; P < 0.05) were able to predict final clinical outcome on an individual patient basis in 80% of patients. As such, sensory axonal excitability techniques may provide a means to identify pre-clinical oxaliplatin-induced nerve dysfunction prior to the onset of chronic neuropathy. Furthermore, patients with severe neurotoxicity at treatment completion demonstrated greater excitability changes (P < 0.05) than those left with mild or moderate neurotoxicity, suggesting that assessment of sensory excitability parameters may provide a sensitive biomarker of severity for oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

Characteristics of bortezomib- and thalidomide-induced peripheral neuropathy

Dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN) is frequently reported with the use of thalidomide and bortezomib, novel proteasome inhibitors. While these two agents have significant activity in multiple myeloma (MM), the combination and the associated PN have not been fully examined in untreated patients. The objective of this study was to report the baseline prevalence and occurrence of PN in newly diagnosed MM patients treated with bortezomib and thalidomide. Twenty-seven patients (11 men and 16 women) with previously untreated MM were prospectively monitored for PN. Total neuropathy score reduced (TNSr) was calculated at baseline and after every two cycles of bortezomib treatment. The median cumulative dose of bortezomib was 35.6 mg/m(2) (median 8 cycles) and of thalidomide was 16.8 g. Only three subjects showed mild PN at baseline (whole group median TNSr 0). At the end of treatment, PN developed in 26 patients (median TNSr 8). PN was of mild to moderate severity (TNSr grade 1 = 11, grade 2 = 10, grade 3 = 5, and grade 4 = 0). Nerve conduction studies showed axonal physiology in all except three subjects in whom demyelinating physiology was noted. The median TNSr was 17 in the demyelinating group and 9 in the axonal group. There was no significant correlation of TNSr with cumulative bortezomib or thalidomide dose. At follow-up, 80% of patients had become asymptomatic after discontinuation of the chemotherapy. We conclude that bortezomib and thalidomide combination chemotherapy induces a reversible length-dependent sensory>motor, predominantly axonal, large-fiber>small-fiber polyneuropathy. In a subset, a more severe demyelinating polyneuropathy may develop.

Neuropathies in the context of malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To conduct a critical review of recent data pertaining to the clinical and therapeutic aspects of peripheral neuropathies in the setting of malignancies, with the exception of paraproteinemic neuropathies. Our search extended to the past 2 years, using a PubMed search strategy.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the field of neuropathies linked with the development of the cancer, recent works have focused on lymphoma and cancer-associated vasculitides. In paraneoplastic syndromes, the major fact of the past 2 years is the issue of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these disorders, under the aegis of the paraneoplastic syndromes Euronetwork and of the European Federation of Neurological Sciences. When considering chemotherapy, neurotoxicity is becoming increasingly better known. Finally, the spectrum of late-delayed complications of irradiation further increases with a better clinical characterization of radiotherapy-induced dropped head syndrome.

SUMMARY

This article successively reviews the results of the recent studies in these various fields. In the field of chemotherapy, we will particularly focus on some new data concerning oxaliplatin, bortezomib, the albumin-bound form of paclitaxel and lenalidomide.

Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review of the literature

Bortezomib has demonstrated significant activity in clinical trials, mainly against recurrent or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Peripheral neuropathy is a significant toxicity of bortezomib, requiring dose modification and potential changes in the treatment plan when it occurs. The mechanism underlying bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) is unknown. Metabolic changes resulting from the accumulation of bortezomib in the dorsal root ganglia cells, mitochondrial-mediated disregulation of Ca(++) homeostasis, and disregulation of neurotrophins may contribute to the pathogenesis of BIPN. It is increasingly recognized that BIPN may be a proteasome inhibitor class effect, producing primarily a small fiber and painful, axonal, sensory distal neuropathy. Incidence of BIPN is mainly related to various risk factors, including cumulative dose and evidence of preexisting neuropathy. Assessment of BIPN is based primarily on neurologic clinical examination and neurophysiologic methods. To date, apart from the use of dose reduction and schedule change algorithm, there is no effective treatment with neuroprotective agents for BIPN. Analgesics, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and vitamin supplements have been used as symptomatic treatment against bortezomib-associated neuropathic pain with some success. This review looks critically at the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, characteristics, and management of BIPN, and highlights areas for future research.

Chemobrain: a translational challenge for neurotoxicology

Neurotoxicity is a frequent accompaniment of cancer chemotherapy, and held by many oncologists to be the major dose-limiting side effect. It appears in many forms, but attracted attention during the past decade primarily because of complaints by patients of impaired cognitive function they have labeled as "chemobrain". Neuropsychological testing confirmed the validity of these complaints and has generated a substantial literature examining different aspects of cognitive impairment in various clinical populations undergoing a variety of treatments. Cognitive impairment is far from the only manifestation of neurotoxicity induced by chemotherapy, however. It alters sensory function and motor function as well. A critical need for patients is a suite of methods that will enable clinicians to trace the onset and progression of neurotoxicity so as to guide and balance decisions about the course of chemotherapy. This commentary describes some of the potential methods and encourages neurotoxicologists to enlist their unique skills in the service of these needs.

A review on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral nerve damage

Platinum compounds are a class of chemotherapy agents that posses a broad spectrum of activity against several solid malignancies. Oxaliplatin (OXL) is a third-generation organoplatinum compound with significant activity mainly against colorectal cancer (CRC). Peripheral neuropathy is a well recognized toxicity of OXL, usually resulting in dose modification. OXL induces two types of peripheral neuropathy; acute and chronic. The acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXLIPN) may be linked to the rapid chelation of calcium by OXL-induced oxalate and OXL is capable of altering the voltage-gated sodium channels through a pathway involving calcium ions. On the other hand, decreased cellular metabolism and axoplasmatic transport resulting from the accumulation of OXL in the dorsal root ganglia cells is the most widely accepted mechanism of chronic oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXLIPN). As a result, OXL produces a symmetric, axonal, sensory distal primary neuronopathy without motor involvement. The incidence of OXLIPN is usually related to various risk factors, including treatment schedule, dosage, cumulative dose and time of infusion. The assessment of OXLIPN is primarily based on neurologic clinical examination and quantitative methods, such as nerve conduction study. To date, several neuroprotective agents including thiols, neurotrophic factors, anticonvulsants and antioxidants have been tested for their ability to prevent OXLIPN. However, the clinical data are still controversial. We herein review and discuss the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, characteristics and management of OXLIPN. We also highlight areas of future research.