Evaluation of pretest clinical score (4 T's) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in two clinical settings

Maximum 24-hour platelet count fall: Metric for improving the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia among patients with intermediate probability 4Ts scores

BACKGROUND

Most patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and an intermediate probability 4Ts score do not have HIT. We aimed to develop a metric based on the rate of platelet count fall to aid in discriminating HIT status among patients with an intermediate 4Ts score.

METHODS

We derived a measure of the maximum 24-hour percentage decrease in platelet count (Fallmax ) in a cohort of patients with suspected HIT and an intermediate 4Ts score at the University of Pennsylvania. We validated this metric in a prospectively collected cohort of patients with suspected HIT and an intermediate 4Ts score from four hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-eight and 139 patients were included in the analysis from the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Fallmax was significantly higher in HIT-positive patients in the derivation cohort (49.6% versus 38.6%, P = .009) and validation cohort (43.5% versus 29.3%, P = .027). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.78) and 0.71 (0.59-0.83) in the two cohorts, respectively. At Fallmax  ≥ 30%, sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 29.4% in the derivation cohort and 80.0% and 52.7% in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with suspected HIT and an intermediate 4Ts score, Fallmax aided in discriminating HIT-negative from HIT-positive patients. Using a measure that accounts for the rate of platelet count fall may help to avoid unnecessary suspension of heparin and treatment with an alternative anticoagulant in HIT-negative patients with an intermediate probability 4Ts score, though further evaluation is warranted.

Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation in hypercoagulable patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in patients who tested positive for hypercoagulable hematologic disorders.

METHODS

Adults undergoing continuous-flow LVAD implantation with preoperative hypercoagulability testing between 2004 and 2018 at a single center were reviewed. Hypercoagulability was defined as testing positive for antiphospholipid antibody, anticardiolipin antibody, lupus anticoagulant, protein C, protein S, factor V Leiden, and/or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The primary outcome was survival on the original LVAD. Secondary outcomes included rates of thromboembolic complications and readmission for intravenous heparin treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 270 LVAD patients with pre-implant hypercoagulability testing were included, and 157 (58%) tested positive for a hypercoagulable disorder. Of those testing positive, 10 (6.4%) had a clinical pre-LVAD history of thromboembolic events. Survival was comparable between hypercoagulable and non-hypercoagulable patients (1 year: 73.3% vs 78.9%, P = .2195, 2-year: 60.7% vs 62.8%, P = .3627). Rates of pump thrombosis (14.0% vs 13.3%, P = .8618), hemolysis (4.5% vs 3.5%, P = .3536), stroke (18.5% vs 14.2%, P = .3483) and readmission for IV heparin therapy (87.3% (n = 137) vs 77.9% (n = 88), P = .7560) were similar. Outcomes were comparable in patients with positive hypercoagulable tests when stratified by pre-implant clinical history of hypercoagulability as well as stratified by recent preoperative exposure to heparin or warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, positive laboratory tests for hypercoagulability were common amongst patients undergoing LVAD implantation although few had positive clinical histories. Survival and freedom from thromboembolic complications were comparable to non-hypercoagulable patients. Hypercoagulability alone should therefore not serve as a contraindication to LVAD implantation.

Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) for Treatment of Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (aHIT), including platelet recovery, IVIG dose, dosing weight, IVIG product used, and complications reported.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception through June 21, 2020. Search terms included heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, HIT, intravenous immune globulin, IVIG, autoimmune HIT, aHIT, and immune globulin.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Patients administered IVIG for HIT and diagnosed by immunoassay (optical density ≥2) or positive activation assay were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-four cases were reviewed; 92% had persistent aHIT. Time to IVIG administration post-nonheparin anticoagulant initiation was 9 days (median). Most common IVIG cumulative dose was 2 g/kg (dosed as 1 g/kg/d for 2 consecutive days); 75% had a favorable platelet increase (≥50 × 10⁹/L) within 5 days of initial IVIG dosing.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

aHIT is characterized by critically low platelets, thrombosis, and a persistent delay in platelet recovery despite treatment with a nonheparin anticoagulant. An immunoassay and subsequent confirmatory activation assay (at low, high, and 0 IU/mL unfractionated heparin levels) is recommended to confirm diagnosis. Patients nonresponsive to nonheparin anticoagulants within 5 days of initiation should be evaluated for IVIG treatment (2 g/kg cumulative dose). More data are needed to clarify appropriate IVIG dosing weight, although based on current published literature, it is recommended to use actual body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Data reported support use of IVIG as adjunctive therapy for patients with aHIT. Judicious IVIG use based on key clinical and laboratory findings is critical.

Refractory Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia With Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Treated With IVIg, Steroids, and a Combination of Anticoagulants: A Case Report

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is caused by antibody production that bind complexes between heparin and platelet factor 4 leading to platelet consumption and thrombosis. In a small subset of cases referred to as autoimmune HIT, the antibodies activate platelets even in the absence of heparin. Refractory HIT is a type of autoimmune HIT in which thrombocytopenia persists for weeks after heparin discontinuation and carries increased risk for thrombosis and more severe thrombocytopenia. We present a case of refractory HIT with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) that was successfully treated with a change in anticoagulant alongside steroids and a second trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg).

BILATERAL ADRENAL HEMORRHAGE WITH ADRENAL INSUFFICIENCY AFTER DALTEPARIN USE POST HIP ATHROPLASTIES

Objective

Multiple case reports have implicated the use of heparin for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis with bilateral adrenal hemorrhage. Only 1 previous report has described this with the low molecular weight product, dalteparin. We report a case following bilateral hip arthroplasties.

Methods

Clinical and laboratory data are presented.

Results

A 69-year-old woman underwent bilateral total hip arthroplasties with dalteparin 5,000 international units subcutaneously daily for 30 days postoperatively. The patient's past medical history was unremarkable. She was discharged 5 days post-surgery and required readmission 1 day later for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. Her platelet count was 91 × 10⁹/L (normal, 150 to 400 × 10⁹/L). She was discharged after 4 days with pain resolution. She presented 4 weeks later with nausea and vomiting for several days. Serum sodium was 123 mmol/L (normal, 133 to 145 mmol/L), potassium was 6.0 mmol/L (normal, 3.7 to 5.3 mmol/L), total calcium was 3.37 mmol/L (normal, 2.25 to 2.80 mmol/L), creatinine was 404 μmol/L (normal, 0 to 85 μmol/L), and her platelet count was normal. On short adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test, baseline plasma cortisol was 123 nmol/L and the peak was 129 nmol/L. She was treated with hydrocortisone, fludrocortisone, and 0.9% saline with resolution of symptoms and normalization of electrolytes, calcium, and renal function. Computed tomography showed bilateral adrenal masses. Core needle biopsy was consistent with necrosis. There were no bleeding disorders on hematologic work 3 months later. The most likely etiology of bilateral adrenal hemorrhage was heparin-induced thrombocytopenia from dalteparin.

Conclusion

This case highlights the importance of vigilance for the complication of bilateral adrenal hemorrhage with adrenal insufficiency in patients receiving dalteparin for DVT prophylaxis.

Rivaroxaban as an Alternative Agent for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a high-risk adverse drug reaction because of its associated risk of life- and limb-threatening thrombosis. Rivaroxaban may be considered as an ideal nonheparin anticoagulant alternative for the management of HIT. In this preliminary retrospective study, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban to control the clinically suspected HIT (4Ts score 4 points or greater) were evaluated. Patients with chronic kidney disease, hepatic impairment, mechanical heart valves, and active bleeding were excluded. Forty-two eligible patients who received rivaroxaban for clinically suspected HIT were evaluated by medical records review, with 12-month follow-up after the first dose of rivaroxaban. End points included confirmed thrombosis (primary end point), mortality, and adverse treatment-related events. HIT-associated thrombosis was found in 17/42 (40.5%) patients before receiving rivaroxaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, platelet counts normalized in all patients, with only 1/42 (2.3%) patients developing new thrombosis. No hemorrhagic event was recorded in the patients. Twelve patients (28.6%) died, but the cause of death was not related to the thrombosis, hemorrhage, or adverse effects of rivaroxaban. Our findings are consistent with the available emerging data, suggesting that rivaroxaban is a safe and effective drug for the management of clinically suspected HIT. Rivaroxaban is a particularly valuable treatment option in developing countries, where there are issues of cost and availability of approved alternative agents.

Platelet antibodies in immune thrombocytopenia and related conditions

Platelet autoantibodies are a common finding in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and in rare cases of antibody-mediated platelet function (“acquired thrombasthenia”). In drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia, antibodies react with platelets only in the presence of the offending drug. Alloantibodies reacting with platelets are induced by transfusion of cellular blood products or during pregnancy. They are responsible for fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT), they are able to cause febrile, nonhemolytic transfusion reactions and they give rise to insufficient platelet increments following platelet transfusions. Two rare transfusion reactions: post-transfusion purpura (PTP) and passive alloimmune thrombocytopenia (PAT) are triggered by platelet alloantibodies. This review discusses the clinical value of tests for platelet antibodies in various clinical situations related to insufficient primary hemostasis.

Acute renal failure due to bilateral renal vein thromboses: A rare complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II is a rare but devastating complication of heparin exposure. We review a case of a 66-year-old female who underwent aortic valve surgery requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) support postoperatively. She subsequently developed acute renal failure due to bilateral renal vein thromboses and thrombocytopenia and was found to have platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and was diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). She was transitioned to nonheparin anticoagulation and her thrombocytopenia improved. Although a rare complication of anticoagulation, diagnosing HIT in a patient on ECMO requires a high index of suspicion and should be considered.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair complicated by treatment failure of rivaroxaban

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) is a rare life-threatening complication following exposure to heparin. It is mediated by immune-mediated thrombocytopaenia due to antibody against heparin platelet factor 4 complex. Early identification of the condition and the prompt administration of appropriate treatment are important to prevent morbidity and mortality from HIT. We report a case of HIT associated with open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair causing anterior tibial artery and peroneal artery thrombosis following prophylactic use of unfractionated heparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. Even though enoxaparin was switched to rivaroxaban after HIT was suspected, our patient unfortunately developed a minor cerebrovascular accident during the hospital stay as a consequence of HIT.

Living kidney transplantation without perioperative anticoagulation therapy for a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an antibody-mediated acquired prothrombotic state induced by heparin exposure. The risk of thromboembolic diseases in kidney transplantation with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia without perioperative anticoagulation has not been determined.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 64-year-old male hemodialysis patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was referred to our hospital for living kidney transplantation. Anti-heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody was positive at the time of referral; however, it turned negative 4 months after heparin cessation during hemodialysis sessions. Living kidney transplantation by donation from his wife was performed using the standard technical procedure. Both heparinization and application of medical equipment containing heparin were avoided; however, no anticoagulant was administered intra- and postoperatively. The graft kidney functioned immediately, and no thromboembolic event related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurred.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplantation without perioperative anticoagulation therapy after disappearance of anti-heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with end-stage kidney disease.

A "Catastrophic" Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Background

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a transient, antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia syndrome that usually follows exposure to unfractioned heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). In contrast to other pathological conditions which lead to thrombocytopenia and bleeding complications, HIT results in a paradoxical prothrombotic state. It is caused by antibodies directed to complexes containing UFH or LMWH and a self-platelet protein: the platelet factor 4 (PF4). The heparin-PF4 immune complex leads to activation of platelets, monocytes, and endothelial cells which release procoagulant proteins and tissue factor with subsequent blood coagulation activation. Case Report. We describe the case of a woman undergone to knee replacement and affected by urosepsis who developed a HIT after exposure to enoxaparin. The thrombotic burden was very impressive involving the arterial and venous cerebral vessel and the venous pulmonary, hepatic, and inferior legs vascular beds. The patient was successfully treated with fondaparinux without recurrent thrombosis or bleeding. The clinical scenario could be named “catastrophic HIT” like the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome since they have a similar pathogenetic mechanism involving both platelets and monocytes procoagulant activities and a similar clinical manifestation with a life-threatening multiple arterial and/or venous thromboses.

Conclusion

Patients presenting with HIT could show a very impressive thrombotic burden resembling to that of the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. A careful differential diagnosis should be made towards other pathological conditions which lead to thrombocytopenia to avoid an unnecessary and potentially harmful platelet transfusion. Although fondaparinux is off-label, its use in patients with HIT is simple and seems to be effective.

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), even rare, is a life-threatening, immune-mediated complication of heparin exposure. It is considered the most severe non-bleeding adverse reaction of heparin treatment and one of the most important adverse drug reactions. The pathophysiological basis of HIT results from the formation of an immunocomplex consisting of an auto-antibody against platelet factor 4 (PF4) - heparin complex, which binds to the surface of platelets and monocytes, provoking their activation by cross-linking FcgIIA receptors. Platelets and monocyte activation, leads to the generation of catastrophic arterial and venous thrombosis, with a mortality rate of 20%, without early recognition. The definitive diagnosis of HIT i.e., clinical and laboratory evidence, can not be done at the onset of symptoms because laboratory results may not be available for several days. Thus, the initial approach is to predict the likelihood of HIT, because in highly suspected patients immediate heparin cessation and initiation of alternative anticoagulation treatment are crucial for the prevention of the devastating thrombotic sequelae. Herein, we describe the pathophysiology, the clinical manifestations, the diagnostic approach, and the management of patients with HIT.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT): Review of incidence, diagnosis, and management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life and limb-threatening complication of heparin exposure. Here, we review the pathogenesis, incidence, diagnosis, and management of HIT. The first step in thwarting devastating complications from this entity is to maintain a high index of clinical suspicion, followed by an accurate clinical scoring assessment using the 4Ts. Next, appropriate stepwise laboratory testing must be undertaken in order to rule out HIT or establish the diagnosis. In the interim, all heparin must be stopped immediately, and the patient administered alternative anticoagulation. Here we review alternative anticoagulation choice, therapy alternatives in the difficult-to-manage patient with HIT, and the problem of overdiagnosis.

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia, and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

Hemostatic abnormalities are common among critically ill patients and are associated with a high risk of bleeding. The abnormalities range from isolated thrombocytopenia or prolongation of global coagulation assays to complex disease states, such as thrombotic microangiopathic syndromes, and can be associated with a wide range of conditions, including trauma, surgery, acute disease processes, cardiopulmonary bypass, and exposure to drugs and blood products. Prompt identification of underlying causes is important because treatment strategies vary. Moreover, prompt initiation of both supportive and specific treatments is vital to decrease the morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit.

[CME:Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia]

CME:Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Abstract. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a dangerous, potentially fatal, immunologically mediated side effect of heparin. Typically, five to ten days after heparin exposure there is a decrease in platelet count with a mean of 60 x 109/l. Due to an activation of thrombocytes by HIT antibodies, venous or more rarely arterial thromboses may occur. The diagnosis of HIT includes the calculation of the probability of a HIT using the 4T Score and the laboratory detection of HIT antibodies. The HIT therapy represents the immediate discontinuation of the heparin therapy as well as the beginning of an alternative therapeutic anticoagulation.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Diagnostic challenges in intensive care patients especially with extracorporeal circulation

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious drug induced reaction that may be associated with life threatening complications. Platelet-activating antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes cause the disease. The diagnosis of HIT is challenging, as thrombocytopenia is a frequent finding in intensive care (ICU) patient population, especially during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance of a diagnostic algorithm for HIT in ICU patients.

METHODS

ICU patients who developed thrombocytopenia or thrombosis under heparin treatment were included in this study. The pretest probability for HIT was estimated using the 4Ts-score and patient's sera were tested using two rapid immunoassays (RA) LFI-HIT and PaGIA (from Milenia Biotec and DiaMed), and within 72 h using the IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) from Hyphen and the heparin induced platelet activation assay (HIPA).

RESULTS

392 consecutive ICU patients with suspected HIT were enrolled in this study, of whom 83/392 (21.2%) patients had extracorporeal circulation. Sera from 120/392 (30.6%) and 98/392 (25.0%) patients revealed positive results in RA and IgG EIA, respectively. The HIPA test revealed heparin-dependent platelet activation in a total of 15/392 (3.8%) ICU patients (3 medical and 12 surgical patients). In addition, sera from 7 patients revealed indeterminate HIPA results, of whom 2 patients had a clinical course compatible with HIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from our study confirm the high frequency of IgG PF4/heparin antibodies in ICU patients under unfractionated heparin and shows that the combination of 4Ts-score and RA does not reduce the laboratory overinvestigation for HIT in these patients.

Prediction of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) Using a Combination of 4Ts Score and Screening Immune Assays

Clinical assessment (4Ts) followed by testing for Heparin/platelet factor 4 (HPF4) antibody in intermediate and high risk patients is the standard algorithm of pretest for Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and the diagnosis is confirmed by serotonin releasing assay (SRA) in those who have positive antibodies. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a cohort of patients treated in a community hospital who had HIT antibody test by either ELISA or a rapid Particle Immunofiltration Assay (PIFA), regardless of their 4Ts scores. Among 224 patients, 17 had HIT. The PPV for those with a 4 T score ≥4 was 10.4%, which misdianosed 3 patients with HIT who tested positive for antibodies. Combining 4 T score ≥4 AND positive HIT antibody showed a PPV of 20.3% and a sensitivity of 70.6%, misdiagnosing 5 HIT patients. Using 4Ts ≥4 OR positive HIT antibody showed 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value (NPV). The ELISA test had 100% sensitivity and 100% NPV, while the PIFA test missed 2 HIT patients, with sensitivity of 60% and NPV of 96.7%. Our results suggest that SRA testing should be conducted if a patient presents with a 4 T score ≥4 OR a positive HIT antibody, and antibody tests should be conducted for every patient suspected of HIT.

The General Pediatrician's Guide to Isolated Thrombocytopenia

Platelets are an essential component of the hemostatic pathway; therefore, it is important to identify and diagnose patients with low platelet counts. This can be challenging, however, because thrombocytopenia can be relatively common and the differential diagnosis can be broad. Furthermore, because platelets can be affected both in form and function in a variety of medical conditions, platelet abnormalities can be the principal driver in some disorders but only a consequence in others. Critical factors in identifying the etiology of the thrombocytopenia include the severity and acuity of the patient's initial presentation along with the history, physical examination, and laboratory findings, all of which can provide important clues. The accurate diagnosis of thrombocytopenia is crucial for determining the appropriate management. This review highlights the key diagnostic considerations and recommended treatment when isolated thrombocytopenia is encountered in clinical practice. [Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(1):e27-e35.].

Thrombocytopenia in the Intensive Care Unit

The evaluation and management of thrombocytopenia is a daily challenge for clinicians in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thrombocytopenia is incredibly common, present in upwards of 60% of ICU patients. Additionally, thrombocytopenia in the critically ill is rarely caused by a single etiology. Several causes of thrombocytopenia in the ICU including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura demand urgent recognition and intervention. This chapter provides a general overview of thrombocytopenia in the ICU and highlights important diagnostic and management considerations for some of the most common etiologies.

Management of Select Thrombocytopenias

Evaluating, diagnosing, and managing patients with consumptive thrombocytopenia is challenging because of the overlapping nature of many of the diseases that reduce platelet counts. Immune thrombocytopenia (and its variations), drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia result from autoimmune antibody-mediated destruction of platelets. Thrombotic thrombocytopenia (both congenital and acquired) and the hemolytic uremic syndromes (both typical and atypical) are thrombotic microangiopathies associated with platelet aggregation and consumption along with anemia and renal dysfunction. Rapid history taking, physical assessment, and laboratory evaluation are crucial to accurately managing patients with these disorders. Platelet-associated coagulopathies are infrequently encountered by most providers, and limited exposure to these types of patients, combined with the wide variety of treatment options for reversing bleeding or thrombotic sequelae, makes management difficult. This article reviews the pathophysiology, patient presentation, diagnostic testing, and specific management strategies and challenges of these thrombocytopenias.

A Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a Retrospective Cohort of Lung Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is characterized by thrombocytopenia and potential for thromboembolism. Lung transplant recipients are at risk of developing HIT due to heparin exposure peritransplant. We describe the incidence and impact of HIT in lung transplant recipient index hospital length of stay and survival.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort was obtained from electronic medical records which were queried for all recipients treated with bivalirudin (institutional treatment of choice for HIT) between January 1, 2005, and February 16, 2017 (N = 1171). Patients who developed HIT >30 days after transplant or after their index transplant admission were excluded. A diagnostic algorithm was used retrospectively to determine clinical HIT with an intermediate or high pretest clinical suspicion ("4T" score ≥4) and either (1) positive anti-heparin-platelet-factor 4 (HPF4) assay and a positive functional platelet assay or (2) a positive HPF4 assay only, in patients who did not undergo cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

Among all lung transplant recipients, 2.1% were found to develop HIT in the peritransplant period (N = 25, mean = 88%) with a mean lung allocation score of 50.8 and an incidence of venous thromboembolism of 72%, most upper extremity in location. When matched with historical controls, patients with HIT had a longer overall index hospital length of stay of 43 days (P = .008). There was no difference in short- or long-term survival posttransplant.

CONCLUSION

Vigilance for the development of HIT in lung transplant recipients is necessary to prevent further morbidity from thromboembolic events. In our cohort, HIT increased hospital length of stay but did not appear to affect recipient survival.

Post-Transfusion Purpura: Current Perspectives

Post transfusion purpura (PTP) is an uncommonly reported post transfusion adverse event that can present with severe thrombocytopenia; sometimes resulting in significant bleeding and hemorrhage. Its diagnosis can be elusive given its substantial symptomatic overlap with other thrombocytopenic syndromes. Underdiagnosis and underreporting make the true incidence of disease difficult to define. While clinical suspicion is key, laboratory evidence of platelet-targeted antibodies and identification of the antigen(s) they recognize are necessary to confirm the diagnosis. A curious aspect of PTP is paradoxical destruction of both transfused and autologous platelets. Although the first case was reported over 50 years ago, this aspect of PTP pathogenesis is still not fully understood and is widely debated. Several theories exist, but conclusive evidence to support most is lacking. Despite limited understanding of disease incidence and etiology, treatment with IVIG (Intravenous Immunoglobulin) has become standard practice and can be highly effective. Although recurrence is rare, precautions should be taken if patients with a history of PTP require transfusions in the future.

Pharmacist involvement in clinical assessment and laboratory testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare adverse drug reaction. The anti-PF4 antibody assay (ELISA) is utilized to assist in the clinical evaluation of HIT due to its high negative predictability and wide-spread availability. However, it also associated with false positive results. The 4T score can assist in predicting an individual's risk for HIT and the need for further laboratory testing. This was a single-center prospective observational cohort study. Orders for HIT testing were sent via page to a clinical pharmacist to calculate a 4T score. If low risk, the pharmacist contacted the ordering prescriber to recommend discontinuation of laboratory testing. During the study, a clinical support tool was implemented to assist prescribers with ordering HIT tests. The study was divided into a pharmacist intervention group and a control group. A total of 303 pages were received. One hundred nine were missed due to unavailability of the pharmacist at time of page. A pharmacist reviewed 194 pages and intervened on 132. One hundred seven were scored as low risk, 70 as intermediate risk and 9 as high risk. Pharmacist intervention resulted in discontinuing 64 ELISA and 11 serotonin release assay tests. The clinical support tool resulted in a yearly decrease of HIT testing by 27%. Laboratory cost savings totaled $11,000 but did not include avoidance of laboratory technician or drug cost. Pharmacist involvement in the clinical assessment of HIT and the use of a support tool resulted in the reduction of HIT tests in low risk patients.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia treated with fondaparinux: single center experience

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the most frequent drug-induced, immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation with heparin must be stopped immediately and replaced by some suggested alternative - lepirudin, danaparoid or argatroban. Fondaparinux has been also successfully used in HIT.

METHODS

We present a cohort of 10 patients diagnosed with HIT and treated in a university hospital in a period of four years. Diagnosis was based on Keeling´s scoring system, screening immunologic test for HIT (STic EXPERT® HIT) and sandwich ELISA (detection of IgG/heparin-PF4 antibodies). While other alternative anticoagulants are not readily available in our hospital, we used fondaparinux in all cases.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2018, eight males and two females (mean age 67 years, range 46-86 years) were diagnosed with HIT in our hospital. This complication developed in 9 cases after low-molecular-weight heparin and in one after heparin flushes in hemodialysis. A drop-in platelet count developed in all patients, thrombotic complications in 7 and skin necrosis in 2 cases. Fondaparinux was used in all patients, including two cases with severe renal impairment, the dose was chosen individually. We observed complete platelet recovery in all cases. One patient died because of advanced malignancy, others did not have any complication. In 6 cases we switched to oral anticoagulation after platelet recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

In our group of 10 HIT patients fondaparinux was shown to be both safe and effective, even in those with severe renal impairment. Additional studies are warranted to confirm this observation.

Early Identification of Argatroban Resistance and the Consideration of Factor VIII

BACKGROUND

Argatroban, a synthetic, parenteral, nonheparin anticoagulant, is a direct thrombin inhibitor indicated for the prophylaxis or treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) and for use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who have or are at risk for developing HITT. Although heparin resistance occurs in approximately 0.5% to 5% of heparin-treated patients and is well documented in the literature, argatroban resistance is limited to a single case report. The objective of this case is to describe a case in which argatroban resistance was suspected in a patient with critical limb ischemia.

METHODS

This is a case report of a single patient.

RESULTS

A 68-year-old female admitted for critical limb ischemia requiring vascular intervention was treated for presumed HITT with argatroban. A therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was not attained (31 seconds) despite multiple uptitrations of the dose to 2.8 μg/kg/min (adjusted based on the institutional protocol and with consideration of organ dysfunction). A coagulopathy workup revealed a high level of factor VIII (265%).

CONCLUSION

This case supports early assessment of factor VIII levels and the consideration of argatroban resistance and in patients who have a subtherapeutic aPTT, despite multiple increases in dose with an elevated factor VIII level. Early identification should prompt the use of an alternative anticoagulant to ensure efficacy.

Predictive value of scoring tools in determining heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

There are currently no scoring tools validated for use in predicting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This study aims to determine the predictive value of the Warkentin 4T score, Lilo-Le Louet score, and the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia expert probability score in detecting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This was a single center, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients at Rush University Medical Center. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia–positive patients were defined as those with an optical density greater than or equal to 0.4, consistent with a positive anti-platelet 4 heparin antibody. Out of 39 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, six (15.4%) were found to be anti-platelet 4–positive. A heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosis was confirmed by serotonin-release assay in two patients (5.1%). The 4T, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia expert probability, and Lilo-Le Louet scoring tools all demonstrated a low positive predictive value (21.4%, 16.7%, and 6.7%, respectively), with the 4T and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia expert probability scores demonstrating the highest specificity (66.7% and 84.8%, respectively) and lowest sensitivity (50% and 16.7%, respectively). The Lilo-Le Louet score had high sensitivity (100%) and low specificity (12.5%) in post-cardiopulmonary bypass patients. Based on the findings of this study, all three scoring tools have limited utility for predicting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Prospective comparison of the HEP score and 4Ts score for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) score compared favorably with the 4Ts score in a retrospective study. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the HEP score compared with the 4Ts score in a prospective cohort of 310 patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). A member of the clinical team calculated the HEP score and 4Ts score. An independent panel adjudicated HIT status based on a clinical summary as well as the results of HIT laboratory testing. The prevalence of HIT in the study population was 14.7%. At a cutoff of ≥3, the HEP score was 95.3% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.2-99.4) and 35.7% specific (95% CI, 29.8-42.0) for HIT. A 4Ts score of ≥4 had a sensitivity of 97.7% (95% CI, 86.2-99.8) and specificity of 32.9% (95% CI, 27.2-39.1). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) for the HEP score and 4Ts score were similar (0.81 [95% CI, 0.74-0.87] vs 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69-0.83]; P = .12). The HEP score exhibited a significantly higher AUC than the 4Ts score in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) (0.86 vs 0.79; P = .03). Among trainee scorers, the HEP score performed significantly better than the 4Ts score (AUC, 0.80 vs 0.73; P = .03). Our data suggest that either the 4Ts score or the HEP score may be used in clinical practice. The HEP score may be preferable in ICU patients and among less experienced clinicians.

The use of flow cytometry in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) affects some of the patients exposed to heparin. It is mediated by antibodies that recognize neoepitopes on platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. A HIT diagnosis requires both clinical and laboratory evaluation and remains a challenge. Since many patients develop antibodies in response to heparin, but only a few of them generate anti-PF4/heparin antibodies capable of activating platelets which consequently cause clinical complications, the performance of serologic assays is not enough to diagnose HIT. Functional assays can identify pathogenic antibodies capable of platelet activation, but they are more demanding and their limited availability contributes to the problem of diagnosing HIT. Restricted laboratories usually collect sera of multiple patients to perform functional assays only once or twice a week; hence, a HIT diagnosis can take several days. The use of flow cytometry appears to be a promising alternative in the confirmation of pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Flow cytometric assays detect either activation markers on a healthy donor's platelet surfaces or platelet derived microparticles formed after platelet incubation with a patient's serum. Flow cytometers are readily available in many clinical laboratories, so this technology introduces the possibility of an earlier HIT diagnosis. The objective of this review was to collect findings on flow cytometric HIT confirmations to the present date, and to review the currently available flow cytometric assays used in the diagnosis of HIT.

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinical-pathological disorder; thus, laboratory testing for the pathogenic platelet-activating antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies is central for diagnosis. The "iceberg" model summarizes the inter-relationship between platelet activation assays and PF4-dependent immunoassays, with platelet-activating antibodies comprising a subset of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. The platelet serotonin-release assay (SRA), performed by reference laboratories, has high sensitivity and specificity for HIT (~95% each), and is especially suited for detecting highly pathogenic HIT sera containing both heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet-activating antibodies; this latter subgroup of antibodies explains "autoimmune HIT" disorders (delayed-onset, persisting, spontaneous, heparin "flush," fondaparinux-associated). Recently, SRA-negative HIT has become recognized, in which serum from some HIT patients contains subthreshold levels of platelet-activating antibodies (by SRA) that become detectable using a PF4-enhanced platelet activation assay. Unusual immunologic features of HIT include early antibody detectability (at onset of platelet count fall) and antibody transience (seroreversion). Widely available PF4-dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have high sensitivity but poor specificity for HIT, although specificity is enhanced with IgG-specific EIAs and strong positive results; unfortunately, EIA results are usually not available in real time. Automated rapid immunoassays, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), facilitate real-time laboratory diagnosis. Recently available likelihood ratio (LR) data for positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) test results allow clinicians to adjust their pretest probabilities for HIT, using Bayesian analysis, into real-time posttest probabilities that are dramatically increased (test positive) or decreased (test negative). Moreover, (semi-)quantitative CLIA- and LIA-positive results (weak, moderate, strong positive) can further refine the posttest probability of HIT.

Prospective evaluation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia expert probability and 4T scores in Chinese patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Background

Diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is challenging. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of HIT expert probability (HEP) and 4T scores, and to evaluate the inter-observer reliability for the 4T score in a clinical setting.

Methods

This prospective study included HIT-suspected patients between 2016 and 2018. Three hematologists assessed the HEP and 4T scores. Correlations between scores and anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4)/heparin antibodies were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the predictive accuracy of these two scoring models. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the inter-observer agreement of 4T scores between residents and hematologists.

Results

Of the 89 subjects included, 22 (24.7%) were positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibody. The correlations between antibody titer and either HEP or 4T scores were similar (r = 0.392, P < 0.01 for the HEP score; r = 0.444, P < 0.01 for the 4T score). No significant difference in the diagnostic performance was displayed between these two scores (AUC for the HEP score: 0.778 vs. AUC for the 4T score: 0.741, P = 0.357). Only 72 4T scores were collected from the residents, with a surprisingly low percentage of observers (43.1%) presenting the four individual item scores which made up their 4T score. The AUC of 4T score assessed by residents and hematologists was 0.657 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 536–0.765) and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.667–0.869, P < 0.05), respectively. The ICC of 4T score between residents and hematologists was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.29–0.65, P < 0.01), demonstrating a fair inter-observer agreement.

Conclusions

The HEP score does not display a better performance for predicting HIT than the 4T score. With the unsatisfactory completion rate, the inter-observer agreement of 4T score in a tertiary hospital is fair, underscoring the necessity for continuing education for physicians.

Use of an argatroban-based purge solution in a percutaneous ventricular assist device

PURPOSE

The use of an argatroban-based percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) purge solution in a patient with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is described.

SUMMARY

A 70-year-old woman in cardiogenic shock was admitted to a coronary care unit after being discovered unresponsive at home. A transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a low ejection fraction and findings consistent with takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Administration of multiple inotropes and vasopressors was initially required for hemodynamic support. The patient was implanted with an Impella pVAD (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, MA) using a heparin-based purge solution; an i.v. heparin infusion was initiated for supplemental systemic anticoagulation. Over the next 24 hours, the patient's platelet count decreased from 168,000 to 37,000 cells/μL. Given a differential diagnosis that included HIT, the patient was transitioned to an argatroban-based purge solution. Due to prolonged activated partial thromboplastin times, a systemic argatroban infusion was not initiated, and the patient remained fully anticoagulated throughout pVAD support with only the argatroban-based purge solution. An HIT antibody test was negative. On hospitalization day 9 (day 6 of pVAD support with argatroban use), the patient became hemodynamically stable and was weaned off pVAD support. Three days later, the platelet count had recovered to 117,000 cells/μL (from a nadir of 21,000 cells/μL). During pVAD support, the patient developed hemolytic anemia with minimal bleeding complications.

CONCLUSION

Argatroban was used as a purge solution anticoagulant in a patient with an Impella pVAD and found to be a safe and effective alternative to heparin.

Implementation of Whole-Blood Impedance Aggregometry for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Functional Assay and Case Discussion

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) ideally requires a functional assay to confirm. 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) as "gold standard" is technically challenging and unsuitable for routine use. We conducted a study to assess the performance of whole-blood impedance aggregometry (WBIA) as a simple and rapid HIT functional assay.

METHODS

Platelet factor 4 (PF4)/immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody, WBIA, and SRA were tested on 70 patients suspected of having HIT. Patients with a 4Ts score of 4 or more, positive PF4/IgG, and positive SRA were considered HIT positive; others were designated HIT negative.

RESULTS

WBIA had 85.7% (6/7) sensitivity and 98.4% (61/62) specificity, which were not statistically different compared with SRA. Sixty-two of 70 patients had concordant results (five positive and 57 negative) by both WBIA and SRA. Eight discordant cases revealed the importance of recognizing donor effect, interferences, and the presence of heparin-independent or non-heparin-dependent antibodies in functional assays.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of WBIA could facilitate timely diagnosis and management of HIT.

Missed Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) Diagnosis in a Patient with Acute Stent Thrombosis

Patient: Male, 74

Final Diagnosis: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Symptoms: Chest discomfort

Medication: Heparin

Clinical Procedure: Angioplasty and bypass surgery

Specialty: Cardiology

Utilizing a PLASMIC score-based approach in the management of suspected immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a cost minimization analysis within the Harvard TMA Research Collaborative

The PLASMIC score is a recently described clinical scoring algorithm that rapidly assesses the probability of severe ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) deficiency among patients presenting with microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia. Using a large multi-institutional cohort, we explored whether an approach utilizing the PLASMIC score to risk-stratify patients with suspected immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) could lead to significant cost savings. Our consortium consists of institutions with an unrestricted approach to ADAMTS13 testing (Group A) and those that require pre-approval by the transfusion medicine service (Group B). Institutions in Group A tested more patients than those in Group B (P < 0·001) but did not identify more cases of iTTP (P = 0·29) or have lower iTTP-related mortality (P = 0·84). Decision tree cost analysis showed that applying a PLASMIC score-based strategy to screen patients for ADAMTS13 testing in Group A would have reduced costs by approximately 27% over the 12-year period of our study compared to the current approach. Savings were primarily driven by a reduction in unnecessary therapeutic plasma exchanges, but lower utilization of ADAMTS13 testing and subspecialty consultations also contributed. Our data indicate that using the PLASMIC score to guide ADAMTS13 testing and the management of patients with suspected iTTP could be associated with significant cost savings.

Routine monitoring for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia following lower limb arthroplasty: Is it necessary? A prospective study in a UK district general hospital

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life-threatening condition associated with heparin administration. Many orthopaedic units routinely prescribe low-molecular-weight heparins as thromboprophylaxis after hip and knee arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS

We postulated that routine platelet monitoring following heparin administration is of no clinical benefit. We therefore asked: firstly, what was the rate of thrombocytopenia in a large population of patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty? Secondly, did this rate justify routine platelet monitoring?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unless contraindicated, all patients (n=1999, 53.05% female, mean age 69.23 years) at a UK district general hospital undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty were given daily prophylactic enoxaparin. Platelet counts were obtained between the 8th and 10th postoperative days and compared to preoperative baseline. A > 50% fall in platelet count was classified as "possible HIT". The minimal acceptable risk of thrombocytopenia was defined using The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2012 guidelines, which recommend monitoring platelet counts in patients receiving heparin where the expected risk of HIT is>1% and by descriptive cost-benefit analysis based on the cost of routine platelet monitoring in the clinical setting.

RESULTS

Complete results were available for 1361 (68.1%) patients, comprising: 653 primary hips, 22 revision hips, 1 hip resurfacing, 665 primary knees, 19 revision knees and 1 unicompartmental knee replacement. Mean platelet level was 281.9×109/L preoperatively and 527.83×109/L postoperatively. Forty-four patients (3.2%) experienced a postoperative fall in platelet levels. However, no patient experienced a drop in platelets to less than 50% of the preoperative value.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of HIT in the elective arthroplasty population is low. Therefore, routine postoperative monitoring of platelets is not necessary in this population of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, prospective study.

Evaluation of a rapid and automated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia immunoassay

Introduction

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life‐threatening adverse reaction of heparin. Laboratory evaluation of HIT is often not available within a reasonable time. We evaluated the HemosIL^® HIT‐Ab_(PF4‐H) (Instrumentation Laboratory), a rapid, on‐demand, fully automated, latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA).

Materials and methods

Following determination of the LIA's reference interval and cutoff values, a multicenter study was conducted between March 2013 and June 2015. Plasma samples of HIT‐suspected patients (n = 632) were collected and evaluated by LIA on the ACL TOP^® Family systems (Instrumentation Laboratory), enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (EIA), and serotonin release assay (SRA). Patient characteristics, medical conditions, comorbidities, laboratory results, and medications were collected via medical chart review. The pretest clinical probability of HIT was also calculated for each patient.

Results

Based on the 95% reference interval for healthy donors and HIT‐negative patients, a LIA value ≥1.0 U/mL was interpreted positive. The overall agreement of LIA versus EIA and SRA results were 90% (95% CI 88%‐92%) and 79% (95% CI 75%‐82%), respectively. The negative predictive value for LIA and EIA was comparable (87%) with SRA. The positive and negative percent agreements with the clinical probability were 89% (95% CI 69%‐97%) and 86% (95% CI 83%‐89%), respectively, with a negative predictive value of 99.6% (95% CI 98%‐100%).

Discussion

Overall, the LIA results were comparable to those of EIA and SRA. This fully automated assay with a remarkable short analytical turnaround time of <20 minutes can be performed on‐demand, which would greatly facilitate more prompt management of HIT.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia diagnostic testing after adult cardiac surgery: a single-centre experience and development

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence and outcome of heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT) in patients after cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and to review the time course of platelet counts and the use of different immunological diagnostic tests.

METHODS

All patients ≥18 years of age who underwent CPB from 2006 to 2015 and who were postoperatively admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) were included in this retrospective study. Screening for heparin/platelet factor-4 antibodies was performed using an antibody test, which was later replaced with a screening test specific for IgG antibodies without IgA/IgM cross-reactivity. The enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of antibodies of all immunoglobulin classes against heparin/PF4 complexes was replaced with an IgG-specific EIA. HIT was confirmed by a heparin-induced platelet aggregation test until 2014.

RESULTS

Among 4978 patients admitted between 2006 and 2015, 539 (11%) patients were evaluated for HIT. Patients were excluded because of age <18 years (n = 9), non-cardiac surgery without CPB (n = 10) or incomplete data (n = 3). Of the remaining 517 patients, 43 (8.3%) patients were HIT-positive. HIT incidence was 0.86%. The proportion of HIT-positive patients was similar in men and women (8.4% and 8.2%, respectively). Men and women with suspected HIT also had similar in-hospital mortality (odds ratio ≈ 1; P = 0.926).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of HIT was lower in our study than previously reported. Novel immunological tests have improved to specifically detect IgG antibodies. Furthermore, they are able to detect anti-protamine antibodies, which may be present in patients with high clinical probability of testing negative for HIT. Incidence and clinical relevance of heparin/protamine antibodies will be subjects of future investigation.

Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and venous limb gangrene after aortic dissection repair: in vitro and in vivo effects of intravenous immunoglobulin

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder characterized by heparin-dependent antibodies that activate platelets (PLTs) via PLT FcγIIa receptors. "Autoimmune" HIT (aHIT) indicates a HIT subset where thrombocytopenia progresses or persists despite stopping heparin; aHIT sera activate PLTs strongly even in the absence of heparin (heparin-independent PLT-activating properties). Affected patients are at risk of severe complications, including dual macro- and microvascular thrombosis leading to venous limb gangrene. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) offers an approach to interrupt heparin-independent PLT-activating effects of aHIT antibodies.

CASE REPORT

A 78-year-old male who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for aortic dissection developed aHIT, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and deep vein thrombosis; progression to venous limb gangrene occurred during partial thromboplastin time (PTT)-adjusted bivalirudin infusion (underdosing from "PTT confounding"). Thrombocytopenia recovered with high-dose IVIG, although the PLT count increase began only after the third dose of a 5-day IVIG regimen (0.4 g/kg/day × 5 days). We reviewed case reports and case series of IVIG for treating HIT, focusing on various IVIG dosing regimens used.

RESULTS

Patient serum-induced PLT activation was inhibited in vitro by IVIG in a dose-dependent fashion; inhibition of PLT activation by IVIG was much more marked in the absence of heparin versus the presence of heparin (0.2 U/mL). Our literature review indicated 1 g/kg × 2 IVIG dosing as most common for treating HIT, usually associated with rapid PLT count recovery.

CONCLUSION

Our clinical and laboratory observations support dose-dependent efficacy of IVIG for decreasing PLT activation and thus correcting thrombocytopenia in aHIT. Our case experience and literature review suggests dosing of 1 g/kg IVIG × 2 for patients with severe aHIT.