151
|
Tien CJ, Bond JE, Chen ZJ. Associating dose-volume characteristics with theoretical radiobiological metrics for rapid Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery plan evaluation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:132-140. [PMID: 32910543 PMCID: PMC7592963 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine general dose–volume characteristics in Gamma Knife (GK) plans which may be associated with higher tumor control probability (TCP) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) using characteristic curve sets. Methods Two sets of dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were exported alongside an analytical purpose‐generated DVH: (a) single‐shot large collimator (8 or 16 mm) emulated with multiple shots of 4 mm collimator. (b) shot‐within‐shot (SWS) technique with isodose lines (IDLs) of 40–75%. TCP, average dose, EUD in single‐fraction (EUDT) and 2 Gy fractionated regimens (EUDR) were examined for trends with cumulative DVH (cDVH) shape as calculated using a linear‐quadratic cell survival model (α/β = 10.0 Gy, N0 = 1 × 106) with both α = 0.20 Gy−1 and α = 0.23 Gy−1. Results Using α = 0.20 Gy−1 (α = 0.23 Gy−1), plans in the analytical set with higher shoulder regions had TCP, EUDT, EUDR increased by 180%, 5.9%, 10.7% (11.2%, 6.3%, 10.0%), respectively. With α = 0.20 Gy−1 (α = 0.23 Gy−1), plans with higher heels had TCP, EUDT, EUDR increased by 4.0%, <1%, <1% (0.6%, <1%, <1%), respectively. In emulating a 16 (8) mm collimator, 64 (12) shots of the small collimators were used. Plans based on small collimators had higher shoulder regions and, with α = 0.20 Gy−1 (α = 0.23 Gy−1), TCP, EUDT, EUDR was increased up to 351.4%, 5.0%, 8.8% (270.4%, 5.0%, 6.8%) compared with the single‐shot large collimator. Delivery times ranged from 10.2 to 130.3 min. The SWS technique used 16:8 mm collimator weightings ranging from 1:2 to 9.2:1 for 40–75% IDL. With α = 0.20 Gy−1 (α = 0.23 Gy−1), the 40% IDL plan had the highest shoulder with increased TCP, EUDT, EUDR by 130.7%, 9.6%, 17.1% (12.9%, 9.1%, 16.4%) over the 75% IDL plan. Delivery times ranged 6.9–13.8 min. Conclusions The magnitude of the shoulder region characteristic to GK cDVHs may be used to rapidly identify superior plan among candidates. Practical issues such as delivery time may require further consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Tien
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - James E Bond
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zhe Jay Chen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Conformal Avoidance of Normal Organs at Risk by Perfusion-Modulated Dose Sculpting in Tumor Single-Dose Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:288-297. [PMID: 32777335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although 24 Gy single-dose radiation therapy (SDRT) renders >90% 5-year local relapse-free survival in human solid tumor lesions, SDRT delivery is not feasible in ∼50% of oligometastatic lesions owing to interference by dose/volume constraints of a serial organ at risk (OAR). Conformal OAR avoidance is based on a hypothetical model positing that the recently described SDRT biology specifically permits volumetric subdivision of the SDRT dose, such that high-intensity vascular drivers of SDRT lethality, generated within a major tumor subvolume exposed to a high 24 Gy dose (high-dose planning target volume [PTVHD]), would equilibrate SDRT signaling intensity throughout the tumor interstitial space, rendering bystander radiosensitization of a minor subvolume (perfusion-modulated dose sculpting PTV [PTVPMDS]), dose-sculpted to meet a serial OAR dose/volume constraint. An engineered PTVPMDS may thus yield tumor ablation despite PMDS dose reduction and conformally avoiding OAR exposure to a toxic dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS Dose fall-off within the PTVPMDS penumbra of oligometastatic lesions was planned and delivered by intensity modulated inverse dose painting. SDRT- and SDRT-PMDS-treated lesions were followed with periodic positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging to assess local tumor control. RESULTS Cumulative baseline 5-year local relapse rates of oligometastases treated with 24 Gy SDRT alone (8% relapses, n = 292) were similar in moderate PTVPMDS dose-sculpted (23-18 Gy, n = 76, 11% relapses, P = .36) and extreme dose-sculpted (<18 Gy, n = 61, 14% relapses, P = .29) lesions, provided the major 24 Gy PTVHD constituted ≥60% of the total PTV. In contrast, 28% of local relapses occurred in 26 extreme dose-sculpted PTVPMDS lesions when PTVHD constituted <60% of the total PTV (P = .004), suggesting a threshold for the PTVPMDS bystander effect. CONCLUSION The study provides compelling clinical support for the bystander radiosensitization hypothesis, rendering local cure of tumor lesions despite a ≥25% PTVPMDS dose reduction of the 24 Gy PTVHD dose, adapted to conformally meet OAR dose/volume constraints. The SDRT-PMDS approach thus provides a therapeutic resolution to otherwise radioablation-intractable oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|
153
|
Rechner LA, Modiri A, Stick LB, Maraldo MV, Aznar MC, Rice SR, Sawant A, Bentzen SM, Vogelius IR, Specht L. Biological optimization for mediastinal lymphoma radiotherapy - a preliminary study. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:879-887. [PMID: 32216586 PMCID: PMC7446040 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1733654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: In current radiotherapy (RT) planning and delivery, population-based dose-volume constraints are used to limit the risk of toxicity from incidental irradiation of organs at risks (OARs). However, weighing tradeoffs between target coverage and doses to OARs (or prioritizing different OARs) in a quantitative way for each patient is challenging. We introduce a novel RT planning approach for patients with mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) that aims to maximize overall outcome for each patient by optimizing on tumor control and mortality from late effects simultaneously.Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 34 HL patients treated with conformal RT (3DCRT). We used published data to model recurrence and radiation-induced mortality from coronary heart disease and secondary lung and breast cancers. Patient-specific doses to the heart, lung, breast, and target were incorporated in the models as well as age, sex, and cardiac risk factors (CRFs). A preliminary plan of candidate beams was created for each patient in a commercial treatment planning system. From these candidate beams, outcome-optimized (O-OPT) plans for each patient were created with an in-house optimization code that minimized the individual risk of recurrence and mortality from late effects. O-OPT plans were compared to VMAT plans and clinical 3DCRT plans.Results: O-OPT plans generally had the lowest risk, followed by the clinical 3DCRT plans, then the VMAT plans with the highest risk with median (maximum) total risk values of 4.9 (11.1), 5.1 (17.7), and 7.6 (20.3)%, respectively (no CRFs). Compared to clinical 3DCRT plans, O-OPT planning reduced the total risk by at least 1% for 9/34 cases assuming no CRFs and 11/34 cases assuming presence of CRFs.Conclusions: We developed an individualized, outcome-optimized planning technique for HL. Some of the resulting plans were substantially different from clinical plans. The results varied depending on how risk models were defined or prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Ann Rechner
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Arezoo Modiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Line Bjerregaard Stick
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maja V. Maraldo
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne C. Aznar
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | - Amit Sawant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Søren M. Bentzen
- Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ivan Richter Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Dahlman EL, Watanabe Y. Evaluating the biologically effective dose (BED) concept using a dynamic tumor simulation model. Med Phys 2020; 47:3710-3720. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Erik L. Dahlman
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Minnesota MMC 494 Mayo 8494A 420 Delaware St, SE Minneapolis MN55455USA
| | - Yoichi Watanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Minnesota MMC 494 Mayo 8494A 420 Delaware St, SE Minneapolis MN55455USA
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Biological dose summation of intensity-modulated arc therapy and image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:260-266. [PMID: 32695198 PMCID: PMC7366016 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.96868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To present an alternative method for summing biologically effective doses of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) as teletherapy (TT), with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) boost in prostate cancer. Total doses using IMAT boost was compared with BT boost using our method. Material and methods Initially, 25 IMAT TT plus interstitial HDR-BT plans were included, and additional plans using IMAT TT boost were created. The prescribed dose was 2/44 Gy to the whole pelvis, 2/60 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles, and 1 × 10 Gy BT or 2/18 Gy IMAT TT to the prostate. Teletherapy computed tomography (CT) was registered with ultrasound (US) of BT, and the most exposed volume of critical organs in BT were identified on these CT images. The minimal dose of these from IMAT TT was summed with their BT dose, and these EQD2 doses were compared using BT vs. IMAT TT boost. This method was compared with uniform dose conception (UDC). Results D90 of the prostate was significantly higher with BT than with IMAT TT boost: 99.3 Gy vs. 77.9 Gy, p = 0.0034. The D2 to rectum, bladder, and hips were 50.3 Gy vs. 76.8 Gy (p = 0.0117), 64.7 Gy vs. 78.3 Gy (p = 0.0117), and 41.9 Gy vs. 50.6 Gy (p = 0.0044), while D0.1 to urethra was 96.1 Gy vs. 79.3 Gy (p = 0.0180), respectively. UDC overestimated D2 (rectum) by 37% (p = 0.0117), D2 (bladder) by 5% (p = 0.0214), and underestimated D0.1 (urethra) by 1% (p = 0.0277). Conclusions Based on our biological dose summation method, the total dose of prostate is higher using BT boost than the IMAT. BT boost yields lower rectum, bladder, and hips doses, but higher dose to urethra. UDC overestimates rectum and bladder dose and underestimates the dose to urethra.
Collapse
|
156
|
Klement RJ, Sonke JJ, Allgäuer M, Andratschke N, Appold S, Belderbos J, Belka C, Blanck O, Dieckmann K, Eich HT, Mantel F, Eble M, Hope A, Grosu AL, Nevinny-Stickel M, Semrau S, Sweeney RA, Hörner-Rieber J, Werner-Wasik M, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Ye H, Grills I, Guckenberger M. Correlating Dose Variables with Local Tumor Control in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Modeling Study on 1500 Individual Treatments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:579-586. [PMID: 32188579 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large variation regarding prescription and dose inhomogeneity exists in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. The aim of this modeling study was to identify which dose metric correlates best with local tumor control probability to make recommendations regarding SBRT prescription. METHODS AND MATERIALS We combined 2 retrospective databases of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, yielding 1500 SBRT treatments for analysis. Three dose parameters were converted to biologically effective doses (BEDs): (1) the (near-minimum) dose prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) periphery (yielding BEDmin); (2) the (near-maximum) dose absorbed by 1% of the PTV (yielding BEDmax); and (3) the average between near-minimum and near-maximum doses (yielding BEDave). These BED parameters were then correlated to the risk of local recurrence through Cox regression. Furthermore, BED-based prediction of local recurrence was attempted by logistic regression and fast and frugal trees. Models were compared using the Akaike information criterion. RESULTS There were 1500 treatments in 1434 patients; 117 tumors recurred locally. Actuarial local control rates at 12 and 36 months were 96.8% (95% confidence interval, 95.8%-97.8%) and 89.0% (87.0%-91.1%), respectively. In univariable Cox regression, BEDave was the best predictor of risk of local recurrence, and a model based on BEDmin had substantially less evidential support. In univariable logistic regression, the model based on BEDave also performed best. Multivariable classification using fast and frugal trees revealed BEDmax to be the most important predictor, followed by BEDave. CONCLUSIONS BEDave was generally better correlated with tumor control probability than either BEDmax or BEDmin. Because the average between near-minimum and near-maximum doses was highly correlated to the mean gross tumor volume dose, the latter may be used as a prescription target. More emphasis could be placed on achieving sufficiently high mean doses within the gross tumor volume rather than the PTV covering dose, a concept needing further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany.
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Allgäuer
- Department of Radiotherapy, Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Steffen Appold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - José Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hans T Eich
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Frederick Mantel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzberg, Germany
| | - Michael Eble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Andrew Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Sabine Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Phillips-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hong Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Inga Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | |
Collapse
|
157
|
Conventional dose rate spatially-fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) treatment response and its association with dosimetric parameters-A preclinical study in a Fischer 344 rat model. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229053. [PMID: 32569277 PMCID: PMC7307781 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify key dosimetric parameters that have close associations with tumor treatment response and body weight change in SFRT treatments with a large range of spatial-fractionation scale at dose rates of several Gy/min. Methods Six study arms using uniform tumor radiation, half-tumor radiation, 2mm beam array radiation, 0.3mm minibeam radiation, and an untreated arm were used. All treatments were delivered on a 320kV x-ray irradiator. Forty-two female Fischer 344 rats with fibrosarcoma tumor allografts were used. Dosimetric parameters studied are peak dose and width, valley dose and width, peak-to-valley-dose-ratio (PVDR), volumetric average dose, percentage volume directly irradiated, and tumor- and normal-tissue EUD. Animal survival, tumor volume change, and body weight change (indicative of treatment toxicity) are tested for association with the dosimetric parameters using linear regression and Cox Proportional Hazards models. Results The dosimetric parameters most closely associated with tumor response are tumor EUD (R2 = 0.7923, F-stat = 15.26*; z-test = -4.07***), valley (minimum) dose (R2 = 0.7636, F-stat = 12.92*; z-test = -4.338***), and percentage tumor directly irradiated (R2 = 0.7153, F-stat = 10.05*; z-test = -3.837***) per the linear regression and Cox Proportional Hazards models, respectively. Tumor response is linearly proportional to valley (minimum) doses and tumor EUD. Average dose (R2 = 0.2745, F-stat = 1.514 (no sig.); z-test = -2.811**) and peak dose (R2 = 0.04472, F-stat = 0.6874 (not sig.); z-test = -0.786 (not sig.)) show the weakest associations to tumor response. Only the uniform radiation arm did not gain body weight post-radiation, indicative of treatment toxicity; however, body weight change in general shows weak association with all dosimetric parameters except for valley (minimum) dose (R2 = 0.3814, F-stat = 13.56**), valley width (R2 = 0.2853, F-stat = 8.783**), and peak width (R2 = 0.2759, F-stat = 8.382**). Conclusions For a single-fraction SFRT at conventional dose rates, valley, not peak, dose is closely associated with tumor treatment response and thus should be used for treatment prescription. Tumor EUD, valley (minimum) dose, and percentage tumor directly irradiated are the top three dosimetric parameters that exhibited close associations with tumor response.
Collapse
|
158
|
Chaikh A, Thariat J, Thureau S, Tessonnier T, Kammerer E, Fontbonne C, Dubray B, Balosso J, Fontbonne J. Construction des modèles radiobiologiques de type TCP (tumor control probability) et NTCP (normal tissue complication probability) : de la dose à la prédiction des effets cliniques. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:247-257. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
159
|
Toward personalized synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:8833. [PMID: 32483249 PMCID: PMC7264143 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65729-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Synchrotron facilities produce ultra-high dose rate X-rays that can be used for selective cancer treatment when combined with micron-sized beams. Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has been shown to inhibit cancer growth in small animals, whilst preserving healthy tissue function. However, the underlying mechanisms that produce successful MRT outcomes are not well understood, either in vitro or in vivo. This study provides new insights into the relationships between dosimetry, radiation transport simulations, in vitro cell response, and pre-clinical brain cancer survival using intracerebral gliosarcoma (9LGS) bearing rats. As part of this ground-breaking research, a new image-guided MRT technique was implemented for accurate tumor targeting combined with a pioneering assessment of tumor dose-coverage; an essential parameter for clinical radiotherapy. Based on the results of our study, we can now (for the first time) present clear and reproducible relationships between the in vitro cell response, tumor dose-volume coverage and survival post MRT irradiation of an aggressive and radioresistant brain cancer in a rodent model. Our innovative and interdisciplinary approach is illustrated by the results of the first long-term MRT pre-clinical trial in Australia. Implementing personalized synchrotron MRT for brain cancer treatment will advance this international research effort towards clinical trials.
Collapse
|
160
|
Pan X, Levin-Epstein R, Huang J, Ruan D, King CR, Kishan AU, Steinberg ML, Qi XS. Dosimetric predictors of patient-reported toxicity after prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: Analysis of full range of the dose-volume histogram using ensemble machine learning. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:181-188. [PMID: 32388444 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the associations between dosimetric parameters and patient-reported outcomes, and to identify latent dosimetric parameters that most correlate with acute and subacute patient-reported urinary and rectal toxicity after prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using machine learning methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-six patients who underwent prostate SBRT (40 Gy in 5 fractions) were included. Patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were derived from bowel and bladder symptom scores on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) at 3 and 12 months post-SBRT. We utilized ensemble machine learning (ML) to interrogate the entire dose-volume histogram (DVH) to evaluate relationships between dose-volume parameters and HRQOL changes. The latent predictive dosimetric parameters that were most associated with HRQOL changes in urinary and rectal function were thus identified. An external cohort of 26 prostate SBRT patients was acquired to further test the predictive models. RESULTS Bladder dose-volume metrics strongly predicted patient-reported urinary irritative and incontinence symptoms (area under the curves [AUCs] of 0.79 and 0.87, respectively) at 12 months. Maximum bladder dose, bladder V102.5%, bladder volume, and conformity indices (V50/VPTV and V100/VPTV) were most predictive of HRQOL changes in both urinary domains. No strong rectal toxicity dosimetric association was identified (AUC = 0.64). CONCLUSION We demonstrated the application of advanced ML methods to identify a set of dosimetric variables that most highly correlated with patient-reported urinary HRQOL. DVH quantities identified with these methods may be used to achieve outcome-driven planning objectives to further reduce patient-reported toxicity with prostate SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Pan
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, China; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Network Data Analysis and Intelligent Processing, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Rebecca Levin-Epstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Jiahao Huang
- School of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, China
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Christopher R King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
| | - X Sharon Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Sukhikh ES, Sukhikh LG, Lushnikova PA, Tatarchenko MA, Abdelrahman AR. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of simultaneous integrated boost and sequential boost of locally advanced cervical cancer. Phys Med 2020; 73:83-88. [PMID: 32334401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Some patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) cannot undergo brachytherapy (BT). Possible treatment includes two-stage external beam radiotherapy (sequential boost - SEQ) or single-stage external beam radiotherapy (simultaneous integrated boost - SIB). The goal of this paper was to carry out dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of these techniques with respect to tumour and organs-at-risk (OARs) irradiation. Methods The anatomic data of six patients with LACC were used for this study. The single-stage SIB-VMAT (25, 27 or 30 fractions) and double-stage SEQ-VMAT (25 + 6 fractions) plans were developed to deliver EQD2=50 Gy to the pelvic region and EQD2=90 Gy to the tumour. The developed plans were compared with respect to an EQD2 dose delivered to a tumour and to the OARs, expected tumour control probability and normal tissue complications probability. Results The developed SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT plans had physical coverage of the CTV tumours with more than 95% of the prescribed dose delivered to more than 95% of the volume. The irradiation of the tumour for both SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT has comparable EQD2 values close to 87-88 Gy. SIB-VMAT treatment plans provided lower levels of irradiation of OARs than SEQ-VMAT plans. The optimal number of fractions for SIB-VMAT was 27. Conclusion SIB-VMAT is a better treatment option for patients with LACC that are not eligible for BT. Results show that both SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT allowed good coverage of the tumour and high-quality dose delivery. SIB-VMAT allowed minimising irradiation of OARs and shortening the overall treatment time by a week.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S Sukhikh
- Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, 115, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia; Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia.
| | - L G Sukhikh
- Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | - P A Lushnikova
- Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, 115, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | - M A Tatarchenko
- Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, 115, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia; Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
162
|
Guberina N, Pöttgen C, Kebir S, Lazaridis L, Scharmberg C, Lübcke W, Niessen M, Guberina M, Scheffler B, Jendrossek V, Jabbarli R, Pierscianek D, Sure U, Schmidt T, Oster C, Hau P, Grosu AL, Stuschke M, Glas M, Nour Y, Lüdemann L. Combined radiotherapy and concurrent tumor treating fields (TTFields) for glioblastoma: Dosimetric consequences on non-coplanar IMRT as initial results from a phase I trial. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:83. [PMID: 32307022 PMCID: PMC7168823 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01521-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma is a rapidly proliferating tumor. Patients bear an inferior prognosis with a median survival time of 14-16 months. Proliferation and repopulation are a major resistance promoting factor for conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Tumor-Treating-Fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic modality applying low-intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate-frequency (100-300 kHz) alternating electric-fields. More recently interference of TTFields with DNA-damage-repair and synergistic effects with radiotherapy were reported in the preclinical setting. This study aims at examining the dosimetric consequences of TTFields applied during the course of radiochemotherapy. Methods Cone-beam-computed-tomography (CBCT)-data from the first seven patients of the PriCoTTF-phase-I-trial were used in a predefined way for dosimetric verification and dose-accumulation of the non-coplanar-intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT)-treatment-plans as well as geometric analysis of the transducer-arrays by which TTFields are applied throughout the course of treatment. Transducer-array-position and contours were obtained from the low-dose CBCT’s routinely made for image-guidance. Material-composition of the electrodes was determined and a respective Hounsfield-unit was assigned to the electrodes. After 6D-fusion with the planning-CT, the dose-distribution was recalculated using a Boltzmann-equation-solver (Acuros XB) and a Monte-Carlo-dose-calculation-engine. Results Overdosage in the scalp in comparison to the treatment plan without electrodes stayed below 8.5% of the prescribed dose in the first 2 mm below and also in deeper layers outside 1cm2 at highest dose as obtained from dose-volume-histogram comparisons. In the clinical target volume (CTV), underdosage was limited to 2.0% due to dose attenuation by the electrodes in terms of D95 and the effective-uniform-dose. Principal-component-analysis (PCA) showed that the first principal-position-component of the variation of repeated array-placement in the direction of the largest variations and the perpendicular second-component spanning a tangential plane on the skull had a standard deviation of 1.06 cm, 1.23 cm, 0.96 cm, and 1.11 cm for the frontal, occipital, left and right arrays for the first and 0.70 cm, 0.71 cm, 0.79 cm, and 0.68 cm, respectively for the second-principal-component. The variations did not differ from patient-to-patient (p > 0.8, Kruskal-Wallis-tests). This motion led to a diminution of the dosimetric effects of the electrodes. Conclusion From a dosimetric point of view, dose deviations in the CTV due to transducer-arrays were not clinically significant in the first 7 patients and confirmed feasibility of combined adjuvant radiochemotherapy and concurrent TTFields. PriCoTTF Trial: A phase I/II trial of TTFields prior and concomitant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. DRKS-ID: DRKS00016667. Date of Registration in DRKS: 2019/02/26. Investigator Sponsored/Initiated Trial (IST/IIT): yes. Ethics Approval/Approval of the Ethics Committee: Approved. (leading) Ethics Committee Nr.: 18–8316-MF, Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen. Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen. EUDAMED-No. (for studies acc. to Medical Devices act): CIV-18-08-025247.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - C Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - S Kebir
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - L Lazaridis
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - C Scharmberg
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - W Lübcke
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - M Niessen
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - M Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - B Scheffler
- DKFZ-Division Translational Neurooncology at the West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - V Jendrossek
- Institute of Cell Biology (Cancer Research), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - R Jabbarli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - D Pierscianek
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - U Sure
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - T Schmidt
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - C Oster
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hau
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site University Hospital Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - M Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Y Nour
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - L Lüdemann
- Department of Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Shelley LEA, Sutcliffe MPF, Thomas SJ, Noble DJ, Romanchikova M, Harrison K, Bates AM, Burnet NG, Jena R. Associations between voxel-level accumulated dose and rectal toxicity in prostate radiotherapy. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2020; 14:87-94. [PMID: 32582869 PMCID: PMC7301619 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background and Purpose Associations between dose and rectal toxicity in prostate radiotherapy are generally poorly understood. Evaluating spatial dose distributions to the rectal wall (RW) may lead to improvements in dose-toxicity modelling by incorporating geometric information, masked by dose-volume histograms. Furthermore, predictive power may be strengthened by incorporating the effects of interfraction motion into delivered dose calculations.Here we interrogate 3D dose distributions for patients with and without toxicity to identify rectal subregions at risk (SRR), and compare the discriminatory ability of planned and delivered dose. Material and Methods Daily delivered dose to the rectum was calculated using image guidance scans, and accumulated at the voxel level using biomechanical finite element modelling. SRRs were statistically determined for rectal bleeding, proctitis, faecal incontinence and stool frequency from a training set (n = 139), and tested on a validation set (n = 47). Results SRR patterns differed per endpoint. Analysing dose to SRRs improved discriminative ability with respect to the full RW for three of four endpoints. Training set AUC and OR analysis produced stronger toxicity associations from accumulated dose than planned dose. For rectal bleeding in particular, accumulated dose to the SRR (AUC 0.76) improved upon dose-toxicity associations derived from planned dose to the RW (AUC 0.63). However, validation results could not be considered significant. Conclusions Voxel-level analysis of dose to the RW revealed SRRs associated with rectal toxicity, suggesting non-homogeneous intra-organ radiosensitivity. Incorporating spatial features of accumulated delivered dose improved dose-toxicity associations. This may be an important tool for adaptive radiotherapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila E A Shelley
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.,Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB21PZ, United Kingdom
| | - Michael P F Sutcliffe
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB21PZ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J Thomas
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - David J Noble
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Romanchikova
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,National Physical Laboratory, Teddington TW11 0JE, United Kingdom
| | - Karl Harrison
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
| | - Amy M Bates
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Neil G Burnet
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Jena
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.,Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Patnaikuni SK, Saini SM, Chandola RM, Chandrakar P, Chaudhary V. Study of Asymmetric Margins in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Fuzzy Logic. J Med Phys 2020; 45:88-97. [PMID: 32831491 PMCID: PMC7416865 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_110_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of present study is to estimate asymmetric margins of prostate target volume based on biological limitations with help of knowledge based fuzzy logic considering the effect of organ motion and setup errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A novel application of fuzzy logic modelling technique considering radiotherapy uncertainties including setup, delineation and organ motion was used in this study to derive margins. The new margin was applied in prostate cancer treatment planning and the results compared very well to current techniques Here volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plans using stepped increments of asymmetric margins of planning target volume (PTV) were performed to calculate the changes in prostate radiobiological indices and results were used to formulate the rule based and membership function for Mamdani-type fuzzy inference system. The optimum fuzzy rules derived from input data, the clinical goals and knowledge-based conditions imposed on the margin limits. The PTV margin obtained using the fuzzy model was compared to the commonly used margin recipe. RESULTS For total displacement standard errors ranging from 0 to 5 mm the fuzzy PTV margin was found to be up to 0.5 mm bigger than the vanHerk derived margin, however taking the modelling uncertainty into account results in a good match between the PTV margin calculated using our model and the one based on van Herk et al. formulation for equivalent errors of up to 5 mm standard deviation (s. d.) at this range. When the total displacement standard errors exceed 5 mm s. d., the fuzzy margin remained smaller than the van Herk margin. CONCLUSION The advantage of using knowledge based fuzzy logic is that a practical limitation on the margin size is included in the model for limiting the dose received by the critical organs. It uses both physical and radiobiological data to optimize the required margin as per clinical requirement in real time or adaptive planning, which is an improvement on most margin models which mainly rely on physical data only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santosh Kumar Patnaikuni
- Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
- Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Sapan Mohan Saini
- Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | | | - Pradeep Chandrakar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Vivek Chaudhary
- Department of Radiotherapy, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Wang T, Zhou J, Tian S, Wang Y, Patel P, Jani AB, Langen KM, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. A planning study of focal dose escalations to multiparametric MRI-defined dominant intraprostatic lesions in prostate proton radiation therapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190845. [PMID: 31904261 PMCID: PMC7066949 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric effect and clinical impact of delivering a focal radiotherapy boost dose to multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI)-defined dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) in prostate cancer using proton therapy. METHODS We retrospectively investigated 36 patients with pre-treatment mp-MRI and CT images who were treated using pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiation therapy to the whole prostate. DILs were contoured on co-registered mp-MRIs. Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) plans using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) were created based on conventional whole-prostate-irradiation for each patient and optimized with additional DIL coverage goals and urethral constraints. DIL dose coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing were compared between conventional and SIB plans. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were estimated to evaluate the clinical impact of the SIB plans. RESULTS Optimized SIB plans significantly escalated the dose to DILs while meeting OAR constraints. SIB plans were able to achieve 125, 150 and 175% of prescription dose coverage in 74, 54 and 17% of 36 patients, respectively. This was modeled to result in an increase in DIL TCP by 7.3-13.3% depending on α / β and DIL risk level. CONCLUSION The proposed mp-MRI-guided DIL boost using proton radiation therapy is feasible without violating OAR constraints and demonstrates a potential clinical benefit by improving DIL TCP. This retrospective study suggested the use of IMPT-based DIL SIB may represent a strategy to improve tumor control. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study investigated the planning of mp-MRI-guided DIL boost in prostate proton radiation therapy and estimated its clinical impact with respect to TCP and NTCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Yinan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Pretesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Ashesh B. Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Katja M. Langen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Walter J. Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta 30322, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Fernandez-Palomo C, Fazzari J, Trappetti V, Smyth L, Janka H, Laissue J, Djonov V. Animal Models in Microbeam Radiation Therapy: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E527. [PMID: 32106397 PMCID: PMC7139755 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) is an innovative approach in radiation oncology where a collimator subdivides the homogeneous radiation field into an array of co-planar, high-dose beams which are tens of micrometres wide and separated by a few hundred micrometres. OBJECTIVE This scoping review was conducted to map the available evidence and provide a comprehensive overview of the similarities, differences, and outcomes of all experiments that have employed animal models in MRT. METHODS We considered articles that employed animal models for the purpose of studying the effects of MRT. We searched in seven databases for published and unpublished literature. Two independent reviewers screened citations for inclusion. Data extraction was done by three reviewers. RESULTS After screening 5688 citations and 159 full-text papers, 95 articles were included, of which 72 were experimental articles. Here we present the animal models and pre-clinical radiation parameters employed in the existing MRT literature according to their use in cancer treatment, non-neoplastic diseases, or normal tissue studies. CONCLUSIONS The study of MRT is concentrated in brain-related diseases performed mostly in rat models. An appropriate comparison between MRT and conventional radiotherapy (instead of synchrotron broad beam) is needed. Recommendations are provided for future studies involving MRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
| | - Verdiana Trappetti
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
| | - Lloyd Smyth
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, 3057 Parkville, Australia;
| | - Heidrun Janka
- Medical Library, University Library Bern, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Jean Laissue
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; (C.F.-P.); (J.F.); (V.T.); (J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
van Haveren R, Heijmen BJM, Breedveld S. Automatic configuration of the reference point method for fully automated multi-objective treatment planning applied to oropharyngeal cancer. Med Phys 2020; 47:1499-1508. [PMID: 32017144 PMCID: PMC7216905 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In automated treatment planning, configuration of the underlying algorithm to generate high‐quality plans for all patients of a particular tumor type can be a major challenge. Often, a time‐consuming trial‐and‐error tuning procedure is required. The purpose of this paper is to automatically configure an automated treatment planning algorithm for oropharyngeal cancer patients. Methods Recently, we proposed a new procedure to automatically configure the reference point method (RPM), a fast automatic multi‐objective treatment planning algorithm. With a well‐tuned configuration, the RPM generates a single Pareto optimal treatment plan with clinically favorable trade‐offs for each patient. The automatic configuration of the RPM requires a set of computed tomography (CT) scans with corresponding dose distributions for training. Previously, we demonstrated for prostate cancer planning with 12 objectives that training with only 9 patients resulted in high‐quality configurations. This paper further develops and explores the new automatic RPM configuration procedure for head and neck cancer planning with 22 objectives. Investigations were performed with planning CT scans of 105 previously treated unilateral or bilateral oropharyngeal cancer patients together with corresponding Pareto optimal treatment plans. These plans were generated with our clinically applied two‐phase ε‐constraint method (Erasmus‐iCycle) for automated multi‐objective treatment planning, ensuring consistent high quality and Pareto optimality of all plans. Clinically relevant, nonconvex criteria, such as dose‐volume parameters and NTCPs, were included to steer the RPM configuration. Results Training sets with 20–50 patients were investigated. Even with 20 training plans, high‐quality configurations of the RPM were feasible. Automated plan generation with the automatically configured RPM resulted in Pareto optimal plans with overall similar or better quality than that of the Pareto optimal database plans. Conclusions Automatic configuration of the RPM for automated treatment planning is feasible and drastically reduces the time and workload required when compared to manual tuning of an automated treatment planning algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rens van Haveren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Bartzsch S, Corde S, Crosbie JC, Day L, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Lerch M, Pellicioli P, Smyth LML, Tehei M. Technical advances in x-ray microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:02TR01. [PMID: 31694009 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s-1, dose calculation algorithms-apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations-to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
169
|
Meier V, Besserer J, Rohrer Bley C. Using biologically based objectives to optimize boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning for brainstem tumors in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2020; 61:77-84. [PMID: 31600027 PMCID: PMC7004177 DOI: 10.1111/vru.12815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 06/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Irradiated brain tumors commonly progress at the primary site, generating interest in focal dose escalation. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to use biological optimization objectives for a modeling exercise with simultaneously-integrated boost IMRT (SIB-IMRT) to generate a dose-escalated protocol with acceptable late radiation toxicity risk estimate and improve tumor control for brainstem tumors in dogs safely. We re-planned 20 dog brainstem tumor datasets with SIB-IMRT, prescribing 20 × 2.81 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and 20 × 2.5 Gy to the planning target volume. During the optimization process, we used biologically equivalent generalized equivalent uniform doses (gEUD) as planning aids. These were derived from human data, calculated to adhere to normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) ≤5%, and converted to the herein used fractionation schedule. We extracted the absolute organ at risk dose-volume histograms to calculate NTCP of each individual plan. For planning optimization, gEUD(a = 4) = 39.8 Gy for brain and gEUD(a = 6.3) = 43.8 Gy for brainstem were applied. Mean brain NTCP was low with 0.43% (SD ±0.49%, range 0.01-2.04%); mean brainstem NTCP was higher with 7.18% (SD ±4.29%, range 2.87-20.72%). Nevertheless, NTCP of < 10% in brainstem was achievable in 80% (16/20) of dogs. Spearman's correlation between relative GTV and NTCP was high (ρ = 0.798, P < .001), emphasizing increased risk with relative size even with subvolume-boost. Including biologically based gEUD values into optimization allowed estimating NTCP during the planning process. In conclusion, gEUD-based SIB-IMRT planning resulted in dose-escalated treatment plans with acceptable risk estimate of NTCP < 10% in the majority of dogs with brainstem tumors. Risk was correlated with relative tumor size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Meier
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Small Animal Department, Vetsuisse FacultyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Jürgen Besserer
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Small Animal Department, Vetsuisse FacultyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Radiation OncologyHirslanden ClinicZurichSwitzerland
| | - Carla Rohrer Bley
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Small Animal Department, Vetsuisse FacultyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Guo C, Zhang P, Gui Z, Shu H, Zhai L, Xu J. Prescription Value-Based Automatic Optimization of Importance Factors in Inverse Planning. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 18:1533033819892259. [PMID: 31782353 PMCID: PMC6886287 DOI: 10.1177/1533033819892259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: An automatic method for the optimization of importance factors was proposed to improve the efficiency of inverse planning. Methods: The automatic method consists of 3 steps: (1) First, the importance factors are automatically and iteratively adjusted based on our proposed penalty strategies. (2) Then, plan evaluation is performed to determine whether the obtained plan is acceptable. (3) If not, a higher penalty is assigned to the unsatisfied objective by multiplying it by a compensation coefficient. The optimization processes are performed alternately until an acceptable plan is obtained or the maximum iteration Nmax of step (3) is reached. Results: Tested on 2 kinds of clinical cases and compared with manual method, the results showed that the quality of the proposed automatic plan was comparable to, or even better than, the manual plan in terms of the dose–volume histogram and dose distributions. Conclusions: The proposed algorithm has potential to significantly improve the efficiency of the existing manual adjustment methods for importance factors and contributes to the development of fully automated planning. Especially, the more the subobjective functions, the more obvious the advantage of our algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caiping Guo
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan, China.,Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Biomedical Imaging and Big Data, North University of China, Taiyuan, China
| | - Pengcheng Zhang
- Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Biomedical Imaging and Big Data, North University of China, Taiyuan, China
| | - Zhiguo Gui
- Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Biomedical Imaging and Big Data, North University of China, Taiyuan, China
| | - Huazhong Shu
- Laboratory of Image Science and Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Centre de Recherche en Information Médicale Sino-français (CRIBs), Rennes, France
| | - Lihong Zhai
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jinrong Xu
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Galván De la Cruz O, Rodríguez-Ávila M, Rivera-Montalvo T, García Garduño O. Measurement of percentage dose at the surface for a 6 MV photon beam. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2019; 24:585-592. [PMID: 31660051 PMCID: PMC6807031 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate if a radiochromic film (RF) Gafchromic EBT3 is suitable for surface dose measurements of radiotherapy treatments performed with a 6 MV linear accelerator. Two aspects of RF were analyzed, beam energy dependence and surface dose determination. BACKGROUND The measurements done at the surface or near the radiation source are done without charged electronic equilibrium and also have contribution of electron contamination. The detectors used for these measurements should not alter the dose to the target. To counteract these dosimetric problems it is proposed to do the measurements with radiochromic films which are thin detectors and have tissue equivalent properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS The measurements were done using a Novalis linear accelerator (LINAC) with nominal energy of 6 MV. To determine the surface dose, the total scatter factors (TSF) of three different field sizes were measured in a water phantom at 5 cm depth. Energy dependence of EBT3 was studied at three different depths, using a solid water phantom. The surface measurements were done with the RF for the same field sizes of the TSF measurements. The value of the percentage depth dose was calculated normalizing the doses measured in the RF with the LINAC output, at 5 cm depth, and the TSF. RESULTS The radiochromic films showed almost energy independence, the differences between the curves are 1.7% and 1.8% for the 1.5 cm and 10 cm depth, respectively. The percentage depth doses values at the surface measured for the 10 cm × 10 cm, 5 cm × 5 cm and 1 cm × 1 cm were 26.1 ± 1.3%, 21.3 ± 2.4% and 20.2 ± 2.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The RF-EBT3 seems to be a detector suitable for measurements of the dose at the surface. This suggests that RF-EBT3 films might be good candidates as detectors for in vivo dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O.O. Galván De la Cruz
- Unidad de Radioneurocirugía, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes Sur 3877, México City, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada, Unidad Legaria, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Legaria 694, México city, México
| | - M.A. Rodríguez-Ávila
- Posgrado en Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Física, Circuito de la Investigación Científica s/n. Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, México
| | - T. Rivera-Montalvo
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada, Unidad Legaria, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Legaria 694, México city, México
| | - O.A. García Garduño
- Laboratorio de Física Médica, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Insurgentes Sur 3877, México City, México
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Niyazi M, Niemierko A, Paganetti H, Söhn M, Schapira E, Goldberg S, Adams J, Kim V, Oh KS, Hwang WL, Lu HM, Belka C, Busse PM, Loeffler JS, Shih HA. Volumetric and actuarial analysis of brain necrosis in proton therapy using a novel mixture cure model. Radiother Oncol 2019; 142:154-161. [PMID: 31563411 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE High-dose fractionated radiotherapy is often necessary to achieve long-term tumor control in several types of tumors involving or within close proximity to the brain. There is limited data to guide on optimal constraints to the adjacent nontarget brain. This investigation explored the significance of the three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution of passive scattering proton therapy to the brain with other clinicopathological factors on the development of symptomatic radiation necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with head and neck, skull base, or intracranial tumors who underwent proton therapy (minimum prescription dose of 59.4 Gy(RBE)) with collateral moderate to high dose radiation exposure to the nontarget brain were retrospectively reviewed. A mixture cure model with respect to necrosis-free survival was used to derive estimates for the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model while adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS Of 179 identified patients, 83 patients had intracranial tumors and 96 patients had primary extracranial tumors. The optimal dose measure obtained to describe the occurrence of radiation necrosis was the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) with parameter a = 9. The best-fit parameters of logistic NTCP models revealed D50 = 57.7 Gy for intracranial tumors, D50 = 39.5 Gy for extracranial tumors, and γ50 = 2.5 for both tumor locations. Multivariable analysis revealed EUD and primary tumor location to be the strongest predictors of brain radiation necrosis. CONCLUSION In the current clinical volumetric data analyses with multivariable modelling, EUD was identified as an independent and strong predictor for brain radiation necrosis from proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Söhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Emily Schapira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Saveli Goldberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judith Adams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vince Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin S Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William L Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hsiao-Ming Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul M Busse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jay S Loeffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Seibold P, Auvinen A, Averbeck D, Bourguignon M, Hartikainen JM, Hoeschen C, Laurent O, Noël G, Sabatier L, Salomaa S, Blettner M. Clinical and epidemiological observations on individual radiation sensitivity and susceptibility. Int J Radiat Biol 2019; 96:324-339. [PMID: 31539290 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1665209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To summarize existing knowledge and to understand individual response to radiation exposure, the MELODI Association together with CONCERT European Joint Programme has organized a workshop in March 2018 on radiation sensitivity and susceptibility.Methods: The workshop reviewed the current evidence on this matter, to inform the MELODI Strategic Research Agenda (SRA), to determine social and scientific needs and to come up with recommendations for suitable and feasible future research initiatives to be taken for the benefit of an improved medical diagnosis and treatment as well as for radiation protection.Results: The present paper gives an overview of the current evidence in this field, including potential effect modifiers such as age, gender, genetic profile, and health status of the exposed population, based on clinical and epidemiological observations.Conclusion: The authors conclude with the following recommendations for the way forward in radiation research: (a) there is need for large (prospective) cohort studies; (b) build upon existing radiation research cohorts; (c) use data from well-defined cohorts with good exposure assessment and biological material already collected; (d) focus on study quality with standardized data collection and reporting; (e) improve statistical analysis; (f) cooperation between radiobiology and epidemiology; and (g) take consequences of radiosensitivity and radiosusceptibility into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Seibold
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Dietrich Averbeck
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), DRF, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Michel Bourguignon
- Department of Biophysics, Université Paris Saclay (UVSQ), Versailles, France
| | - Jaana M Hartikainen
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Christoph Hoeschen
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Olivier Laurent
- Laboratoire d'épidémiologie des Rayonnements Ionisants, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, PSE-SANTE/SESANE/LEPID, BP17, 92260, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Département Universitaire de Radiothérapie, Centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - Laure Sabatier
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), DRF, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Sisko Salomaa
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Gillmann C, Jäkel O, Karger CP. RBE-weighted doses in target volumes of chordoma and chondrosarcoma patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy: Comparison of local effect models I and IV. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:234-238. [PMID: 31522880 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To compare the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose distributions in the target volume of chordoma and chondrosarcoma patients when using two different versions of the local effect model (LEM I vs. IV) under identical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS The patient collective included 59 patients treated with 20 fractions of carbon ion radiotherapy for chordoma and low-grade chondrosarcoma of the skull base at the Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung (GSI) in 2002 and 2003. Prescribed doses to the planning target volume (PTV) were 60 (n = 49), 66 (n = 2) and 70 (n = 8) Gy (RBE). The original treatment plans that were initially biologically optimized with LEM I, were now recalculated using LEM IV based on the absorbed dose distributions. The resulting RBE-weighted dose distributions were quantitatively compared to assess the clinical impact of LEM IV relative to LEM I in the target volume. RESULTS LEM IV predicts 20-30 Gy (RBE) increased maximum doses as compared to LEM I, while minimum doses are decreased by 2-5 Gy (RBE). Population-based mean and median doses deviated by less than 2 Gy (RBE) between both models. CONCLUSIONS LEM I and LEM IV-based RBE-weighted doses in the target volume may be significantly different. Replacing the applied model in patient treatments may therefore lead to local over- or underdosages in the tumor. If LEM IV is to be tested clinically, comparisons of the RBE-weighted dose distributions of both models are required for the individual patients to assess whether the LEM IV-plan would also be acceptable and prescribed dose as well as clinical outcome data have to be carefully reassessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Gillmann
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Hrinivich WT, McNutt TR, Meyer JJ. Radiation treatment planning with embedded dose escalation. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:145. [PMID: 31412952 PMCID: PMC6693221 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1348-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterogeneous target doses are a common by-product from attempts to improve normal tissue sparing in radiosurgery treatment planning. These regions of escalated dose within the target may increase tumor control probability (TCP). Purposely embedding hot spots within tumors during optimization may also increase the TCP. This study discusses and compares five optimization approaches that not only eliminate homogeneity constraints, but also maximize heterogeneity and internal dose escalation. METHODS Co-planar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were produced for virtual spherical targets with 2-8 cm diameters, minimum target dose objectives of 25 Gy, and objectives to minimize normal tissue dose. Five other sets of plans were produced with additional target dose objectives: 1) minimum dose-volume histogram (DVH) objective on 10% of the target 2) minimum dose objective on a sub-structure within the target, and 3-5) minimum generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) objectives assuming three different volume-effect parameters. Plans were normalized to provide equivalent maximum OAR dose and were compared in terms of target D0.1 cc, ratio of V12.5 Gy to PTV volume (R50%), monitor units per 5 Gy fraction (MU), and mean multi-leaf collimator (MLC) segment size. All planning approaches were also applied to a clinical patient dataset and compared. RESULTS Mean ± standard deviation metrics achievable using the baseline and experimental approaches 1-5) included D0.1 cc: 27.7 ± 0.8, 64.6 ± 10.5, 56.5 ± 10.3, 48.9 ± 5.7, 44.8 ± 5.0, and 37.4 ± 4.5 Gy. R50%: 4.64 ± 3.27, 5.15 ± 2.32, 4.83 ± 2.64, 4.42 ± 1.83, 4.45 ± 1.88, and 4.21 ± 1.75. MU: 795 ± 27, 1988 ± 222, 1766 ± 259, 1612 ± 112, 1524 ± 90, and 1362 ± 146. MLC segment size: 4.7 ± 1.6, 2.3 ± 0.7, 2.6 ± 0.8, 2.7 ± 0.7, 2.7 ± 0.8, and 2.8 ± 0.8 cm. CONCLUSIONS The DVH-based approach provided the highest embedded doses for all target diameters and patient example with modest increases in R50%, achieved by decreasing MLC segment size while increasing MU. These results suggest that embedding doses > 220% of tumor margin dose is feasible, potentially improving TCP for solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William T Hrinivich
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 401 N Broadway St. Weinberg Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
| | - Todd R McNutt
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 401 N Broadway St. Weinberg Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Meyer
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 401 N Broadway St. Weinberg Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Palma G, Monti S, Conson M, Pacelli R, Cella L. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for modern radiation therapy. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:210-218. [PMID: 31506196 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Mathematical models of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) able to robustly predict radiation-induced morbidities (RIM) play an essential role in the identification of a personalized optimal plan, and represent the key to maximizing the benefits of technological advances in radiation therapy (RT). Most modern RT techniques pose, however, new challenges in estimating the risk of RIM. The aim of this report is to schematically review NTCP models in the framework of advanced radiation therapy techniques. Issues relevant to hypofractionated stereotactic body RT and ion beam therapy are critically reviewed. Reirradiation scenarios for new or recurrent malignances and NTCP are also illustrated. A new phenomenological approach to predict RIM is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Palma
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy
| | - Serena Monti
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy
| | - Manuel Conson
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Pacelli
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Cella
- National Research Council, Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Napoli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Rana S, Greco K, Samuel EJJ, Bennouna J. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:36-46. [PMID: 31343826 PMCID: PMC6698765 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE RayStation treatment planning system employs pencil beam (PB) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for proton dose calculations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation PB and MC algorithms on the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) breast plans. METHODS The current study included ten breast cancer patients, and each patient was treated with 1-2 proton beams to the whole breast/chestwall (CW) and regional lymph nodes in 28 fractions for a total dose of 50.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE). A total clinical target volume (CTV_Total) was generated by combining individual CTVs: AxI, AxII, AxIII, CW, IMN, and SCVN. All beams in the study were treated with a range shifter (7.5 cm water equivalent thickness). For each patient, three sets of plans were generated: (a) PB optimization followed by PB dose calculation (PB-PB), (b) PB optimization followed by MC dose calculation (PB-MC), and (c) MC optimization followed by MC dose calculation (MC-MC). For a given patient, each plan was robustly optimized on the CTVs with same parameters and objectives. Treatment plans were evaluated using dosimetric and radiobiological indices (equivalent uniform dose (EUD), tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)). RESULTS The results are averaged over ten breast cancer patients. In comparison to PB-PB plans, PB-MC plans showed a reduction in CTV target dose by 5.3% for D99% and 4.1% for D95% , as well as a reduction in TCP by 1.5-2.1%. Similarly, PB overestimated the EUD of target volumes by 1.8─3.2 Gy(RBE). In contrast, MC-MC plans achieved similar dosimetric and radiobiological (EUD and TCP) results as the ones in PB-PB plans. A selection of one dose calculation algorithm over another did not produce any noticeable differences in the NTCP of the heart, lung, and skin. CONCLUSION If MC is more accurate than PB as reported in the literature, dosimetric and radiobiological results from the current study suggest that PB overestimates the target dose, EUD, and TCP for IMPT breast cancer treatment. The overestimation of dosimetric and radiobiological results of the target volume by PB needs to be further interpreted in terms of clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suresh Rana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Kevin Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - E James Jebaseelan Samuel
- Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Jaafar Bennouna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Wang L, Li C, Meng X, Li C, Sun X, Shang D, Pang L, Li Y, Lu J, Yu J. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of External Beam Radiotherapy Using Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique for Esophageal Cancer in Different Location. Front Oncol 2019; 9:674. [PMID: 31404144 PMCID: PMC6669560 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To compare treatment plans of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique for esophageal cancer (EC) of different locations using dosimetry and radiobiology. Methods: Forty EC patients were planned for IMRT, VMAT, and HT plans, including 10 cases located in the cervix, upper, middle, and lower thorax, respectively. Dose-volume metrics, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were analyzed to evaluate treatment plans. Results: HT showed significant improvement over IMRT and VMAT in terms of CI (p = 0.007), HI (p < 0.001), and TCP (p < 0.001) in cervical EC. IMRT yielded more superior CI, HI and TCP compared with VMAT and HT in upper and middle thoracic EC (all p < 0.05). Additionally, V30 (27.72 ± 8.67%), mean dose (1801.47 ± 989.58cGy), and NTCP (Niemierko model: 0.44 ± 0.55%; Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model: 0.61 ± 0.59%) of heart in IMRT were sharply reduced than VMAT and HT in middle thoracic EC. For lower thoracic EC, the three techniques offered similar CI and HI (all p > 0.05). But VMAT dramatically lowered liver V30 (9.97 ± 2.84%), and reduced NTCP of lungs (Niemierko model: 0.47 ± 0.48%; Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model: 1.41 ± 1.07%) and liver (Niemierko model: 0.10 ± 0.08%; Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model: 0.17 ± 0.17%). Conclusions: HT was a good option for cervical EC with complex target coverage but little lungs and heart involvement as it achieved superior dose conformity and uniformity. Due to potentially improving tumor control and reducing heart dose with acceptable lungs sparing, IMRT was a preferred choice for upper and middle thoracic EC with large lungs involvement. VMAT could ameliorate therapeutic ratio and lower lungs and liver toxicity, which was beneficial for lower thoracic EC with little thoracic involvement but being closer to heart and liver. Individually choosing optimal technique for EC in different location will be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Chengqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Xue Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Chengming Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Xindong Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Dongping Shang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Linlin Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yixiao Li
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining, China
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jinming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Dolly SR, Lou Y, Anastasio MA, Li H. Task-based image quality assessment in radiation therapy: initial characterization and demonstration with computer-simulation study. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:145020. [PMID: 31252422 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2dc5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In the majority of current radiation therapy (RT) applications, image quality is still assessed subjectively or by utilizing physical measures. A novel theory that applies objective task-based image quality assessment in radiation therapy (IQA-in-RT) was recently proposed, in which the area under the therapeutic operating characteristic curve (AUTOC) was employed as the figure-of-merit (FOM) for evaluating RT effectiveness. Although theoretically more appealing than conventional subjective or physical measures, a comprehensive implementation and evaluation of this novel task-based IQA-in-RT theory is required for its further application in improving clinical RT. In this work, a practical and modular IQA-in-RT framework is presented for implementing this theory for the assessment of imaging components on the basis of RT treatment outcomes. Computer-simulation studies are conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and utility of the proposed IQA-in-RT framework in optimizing x-ray computed tomography (CT) pre-treatment imaging, including the optimization of CT imaging dose and image reconstruction parameters. The potential advantages of optimizing imaging components in the RT workflow by use of the AUTOC as the FOM are also compared against those of other physical measures. The results demonstrate that optimization using the AUTOC leads to selecting different parameters from those indicated by physical measures, potentially improving RT performance. The sources of systemic randomness and bias that affect the determination of the AUTOC are also analyzed. The presented work provides a practical solution for the further investigation and analysis of the task-based IQA-in-RT theory and advances its applications in improving RT clinical practice and cancer patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven R Dolly
- SSM Health Cancer Care, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
180
|
Mein S, Dokic I, Klein C, Tessonnier T, Böhlen TT, Magro G, Bauer J, Ferrari A, Parodi K, Haberer T, Debus J, Abdollahi A, Mairani A. Biophysical modeling and experimental validation of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for 4He ion beam therapy. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:123. [PMID: 31296232 PMCID: PMC6624994 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1295-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helium (4He) ion beam therapy provides favorable biophysical characteristics compared to currently administered particle therapies, i.e., reduced lateral scattering and enhanced biological damage to deep-seated tumors like heavier ions, while simultaneously lessened particle fragmentation in distal healthy tissues as observed with lighter protons. Despite these biophysical advantages, raster-scanning 4He ion therapy remains poorly explored e.g., clinical translational is hampered by the lack of reliable and robust estimation of physical and radiobiological uncertainties. Therefore, prior to the upcoming 4He ion therapy program at the Heidelberg Ion-beam Therapy Center (HIT), we aimed to characterize the biophysical phenomena of 4He ion beams and various aspects of the associated models for clinical integration. METHODS Characterization of biological effect for 4He ion beams was performed in both homogenous and patient-like treatment scenarios using innovative models for estimation of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in silico and their experimental validation using clonogenic cell survival as the gold-standard surrogate. Towards translation of RBE models in patients, the first GPU-based treatment planning system (non-commercial) for raster-scanning 4He ion beams was devised in-house (FRoG). RESULTS Our data indicate clinically relevant uncertainty of ±5-10% across different model simulations, highlighting their distinct biological and computational methodologies. The in vitro surrogate for highly radio-resistant tissues presented large RBE variability and uncertainty within the clinical dose range. CONCLUSIONS Existing phenomenological and mechanistic/biophysical models were successfully integrated and validated in both Monte Carlo and GPU-accelerated analytical platforms against in vitro experiments, and tested using pristine peaks and clinical fields in highly radio-resistant tissues where models exhibit the greatest RBE uncertainty. Together, these efforts mark an important step towards clinical translation of raster-scanning 4He ion beam therapy to the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg University, Faculty of Physics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carmen Klein
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Centre François Baclesse, Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Department, Caen, France
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Guiseppe Magro
- National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| | - Julia Bauer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alfredo Ferrari
- European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Katia Parodi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LUM Munich), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg University, Faculty of Physics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Chow JCL, Jiang R, Xu L. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm. Med Dosim 2019; 45:14-18. [PMID: 31103251 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
This study compared the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters of prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using different prescriptions optimized by the photon optimization (PO) and progressive resolution optimization (PRO) algorithm. A total of 20 prostate patients were selected retrospectively and divided into 2 groups of VMAT plans using prescriptions of 60 Gy/20 fx and 79 Gy/38 fx. Inverse treatment planning optimized by the PO and PRO algorithm based on the dual-arc technique was carried out by the Eclipse treatment planning system. The maximum dose, minimum dose, mean dose, dose-volume points, and dose-volume indices of the targets and organs at risk (OAR) were calculated from the plans. In addition, radiobiological parameters such as tumor control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) of the targets and OAR were determined based on their dose-volume histograms (DVHs). A paired Student's t-test was carried out to compare the difference between mean dose-volume points, radiobiological parameters, and dose-volume indices. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was defined as having statistical difference. For prostate VMAT plans optimized by the PO algorithm, equal or slightly larger mean dose and TCP of the PTV (1% for 60 Gy/20 fx and 0.2% for 78 Gy/39 fx) were found by comparing to the PRO. These were followed by finding the slightly larger conformity index (CI; 0.927 vs 0.895 and 0.910 vs 0.904), larger or equal homogeneity index (HI; 0.054 vs 0.052 and 0.058 vs 0.058), and smaller gradient index (GI; 1.366 vs 2.288 and 1.585 vs 1.742) of the PTV using plans optimized by the PO vs PRO using prescriptions of 60 Gy/20 fx and 78 Gy/39 fx. For the OAR, we found that the mean doses, NTCPs, and EUDs of the rectum, bladder, and femur were slightly larger for plans optimized by the PO algorithm compared to the PRO, though both optimization algorithms satisfied all the dose-volume criteria and objectives in the inverse planning. Both the PO and PRO algorithm can generate prostate VMAT plans fulfilling the required dose-volume criteria. It is concluded that plans optimized by the PO algorithm can produce prostate plan with very similar quality compared to PRO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C L Chow
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E2, Canada.
| | - Runqing Jiang
- Medical Physics Department, Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, ON N2G 1G3, Canada; Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Lu Xu
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Morén B, Larsson T, Carlsson Tedgren Å. An extended dose-volume model in high dose-rate brachytherapy - Using mean-tail-dose to reduce tumor underdosage. Med Phys 2019; 46:2556-2566. [PMID: 30972758 PMCID: PMC6852298 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose High dose–rate brachytherapy is a method of radiotherapy for cancer treatment in which the radiation source is placed within the body. In addition to give a high enough dose to a tumor, it is also important to spare nearby healthy organs [organs at risk (OAR)]. Dose plans are commonly evaluated using the so‐called dosimetric indices; for the tumor, the portion of the structure that receives a sufficiently high dose is calculated, while for OAR it is instead the portion of the structure that receives a sufficiently low dose that is of interest. Models that include dosimetric indices are referred to as dose–volume models (DVMs) and have received much interest recently. Such models do not take the dose to the coldest (least irradiated) volume of the tumor into account, which is a distinct weakness since research indicates that the treatment effect can be largely impaired by tumor underdosage even to small volumes. Therefore, our aim is to extend a DVM to also consider the dose to the coldest volume. Methods An improved DVM for dose planning is proposed. In addition to optimizing with respect to dosimetric indices, this model also takes mean dose to the coldest volume of the tumor into account. Results Our extended model has been evaluated against a standard DVM in ten prostate geometries. Our results show that the dose to the coldest volume could be increased, while also computing times for the dose planning were improved. Conclusion While the proposed model yields dose plans similar to other models in most aspects, it fulfils its purpose of increasing the dose to cold tumor volumes. An additional benefit is shorter solution times, and especially for clinically relevant times (of minutes) we show major improvements in tumour dosimetric indices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Morén
- Department of Mathematics, Linköping University, SE-58183, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Larsson
- Department of Mathematics, Linköping University, SE-58183, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
- Radiation Physics, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-58183, Linköping, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Sukhikh ES, Sukhikh LG, Taletsky AV, Vertinsky AV, Izhevsky PV, Sheino IN. Influence of SBRT fractionation on TCP and NTCP estimations for prostate cancer. Phys Med 2019; 62:41-46. [PMID: 31153397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiation therapy is widely used for the hypofractionated treatment of prostate cancer. The range of total doses used in different clinical trials varies from 33.5 to 50 Gy delivered in 4 or 5 fractions. The choice of an optimal total dose value and fractionation regimen for a particular patient can be carried out using the integral radiobiological criteria, namely tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). In this study, we have investigated the dependence of simulated TCP/NTCP values on total dose in the range of 30-40 Gy delivered in 4 or 5 fractions for patients with low-risk prostate cancer in order to find the optimal total dose value and fractionation regimen. METHODS The anatomic data (DICOM CT images) of 12 patients with low-risk prostate cancer, who were treated at Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, were used for the calculation. Dosimetric treatment plans for all patients were simulated using VMAT with 2 arcs in the Monaco treatment planning system v5.10 (Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm) with a total dose equal to 36.25 Gy. The dosimetric plans were rescaled in the dose range of 30-40 Gy. The TCP and NTCP values were calculated based on differential dose volume histograms using the Niemierko model for both TCP and NTCP, and the Källman-s model for NTCP calculations. The TCP calculation was carried out using the uncertainty of well-known tumour radiobiological parameters values, including α/β value. NTCP was calculated for an anterior rectal wall, which was the most irradiated organ at risk due to its close contact with the planning target volume. RESULTS The TCP and NTCP calculations for VMAT of the prostate cancer have shown that the optimal total dose ranges were equal to 32-34 Gy delivered in 4 fractions or 35-38 Gy delivered in 5 fractions. At doses lower than the optimal ones, the TCP values were lower than 95%, while TCP uncertainties were significant (as low as 80%). This fact might bring unexpectedly poor treatment results. At doses higher than optimal ones, the probability of toxicity to the anterior rectal wall became significant. CONCLUSION The optimization of radiation therapy regimen based on TCP/NTCP criteria could help to determine an optimal total dose and a number of fractions for a particular patient depending on patient-specific anatomic features and planned dose distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E S Sukhikh
- Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, 115, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia; Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia.
| | - L G Sukhikh
- Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | - A V Taletsky
- Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, 115, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | - A V Vertinsky
- Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, 115, Lenin Avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia
| | - P V Izhevsky
- Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre, 46, Zhivopisnaya street, Moscow 123182, Russia
| | - I N Sheino
- Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre, 46, Zhivopisnaya street, Moscow 123182, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Evaluation of plan optimisers in prostate VMAT using the dose distribution index. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:Dose distribution index (DDI) is a treatment planning evaluation parameter, reflecting dosimetric information of target coverage that can help to spare organs at risk (OARs) and remaining volume at risk (RVR). The index has been used to evaluate and compare prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using two different plan optimisers, namely photon optimisation (PO) and its predecessor, progressive resolution optimisation (PRO).Materials and methods:Twenty prostate VMAT treatment plans were created using the PO and PRO in this retrospective study. The 6 MV photon beams and a dose prescription of 78 Gy/39 fractions were used in plans with the same dose–volume criteria for plan optimisation. Dose–volume histograms (DVHs) of the planning target volume (PTV), as well as of OARs such as the rectum, bladder, left and right femur were determined in each plan. DDIs were calculated and compared for plans created by the PO and PRO based on DVHs of the PTV and all OARs.Results:The mean DDI values were 0·784 and 0·810 for prostate VMAT plans created by the PO and PRO, respectively. It was found that the DDI of the PRO plan was about 3·3% larger than the PO plan, which means that the dose distribution of the target coverage and sparing of OARs in the PRO plan was slightly better. Changing the weighting factors in different OARs would vary the DDI value by ∼7%. However, for plan comparison based on the same set of dose–volume criteria, the effect of weighting factor can be neglected because they were the same in the PO and PRO.Conclusions:Based on the very similar DDI values calculated from the PO and PRO plans, with the DDI value in the PRO plan slightly larger than that of the PO, it may be concluded that the PRO can create a prostate VMAT plan with slightly better dose distribution regarding the target coverage and sparing of OARs. Moreover, we found that the DDI is a simple and comprehensive dose–volume parameter for plan evaluation considering the target, OARs and RVR.
Collapse
|
185
|
Wang T, Press RH, Giles M, Jani AB, Rossi P, Lei Y, Curran WJ, Patel P, Liu T, Yang X. Multiparametric MRI-guided dose boost to dominant intraprostatic lesions in CT-based High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190089. [PMID: 30912959 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric feasibility of delivering focal dose to multiparametric (mp) MRI-defined DILs in CT-based high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy with MR/CT registration and estimate its clinical benefit. METHODS We retrospectively investigated a total of 17 patients with mp-MRI and CT images acquired pre-treatment and treated by HDR prostate brachytherapy. 21 dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) were contoured on mp-MRI and propagated to CT images using a deformable image registration method. A boost plan was created for each patient and optimized on the original needle pattern. In addition, separate plans were generated using a virtually implanted needle around the DIL to mimic mp-MRI guided needle placement. DIL dose coverage and organ-at-rick (OAR) sparing were compared with original plan results. Tumor control probability (TCP) was estimated to further evaluate the clinical impact on the boost plans. RESULTS Overall, optimized boost plans significantly escalated dose to DILs while meeting OAR constraints. The addition of mp-MRI guided virtual needles facilitate increased coverage of DIL volumes, achieving a V150 > 90% in 85 % of DILs compared with 57 % of boost plan without an additional needle. Compared with original plan, TCP models estimated improvement in DIL control by 28 % for patients with external-beam treatment and by 8 % for monotherapy patients. CONCLUSION With MR/CT registration, the proposed mp-MRI guided DIL boost in CT-based HDR brachytherapy is feasible without violating OAR constraints, and indicates significant clinical benefit in improving TCP of DIL. It may represent a strategy to personalize treatment delivery and improve tumor control. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study investigated the feasibility of mp-MRI guided DIL boost in HDR prostate brachytherapy with CT-based treatment planning, and estimated its clinical impact by TCP and NTCP estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonghe Wang
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Robert H Press
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Matt Giles
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Ashesh B Jani
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Peter Rossi
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Yang Lei
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Pretesh Patel
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Tian Liu
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University , Atlanta, GA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Ayala R, Ruiz G, Valdivielso T. Automatizing a nonscripting TPS for optimizing clinical workflow and reoptimizing IMRT/VMAT plans. Med Dosim 2019; 44:409-414. [PMID: 30952384 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to design a toolkit that interacts with the Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) treatment planning system (TPS) for optimization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy without the need for a dedicated application programming interface. Successful inverse planning of radiotherapeutic treatment depends on the tweaking of many parameters; a tool was thus needed to explore these parameters more exhaustively without significantly increasing planning time. The software that we used was based on an open-source library that mimics human interaction with Microsoft Windows applications. We developed a simple Autoflow software routine that analyzes and optimizes calculated plans by considering the relative impact of different cost functions and modifying constraints accordingly. It was also designed to change segmentation parameters to fit more complex treatments. The toolkit is publicly available for download at https://bitbucket.org/hgugmradiofisica/pymonaco/src/master/. A study of prostate cancer cases was conducted to compare automatically created plans with previously treated cases. The toolkit fully automated the radiotherapy planning procedure, allowing the TPS to calculate or optimize plans during nonworking hours. In the prostate study, the use of this tool reduced the dose to organs at risk with a negligible decrease in target coverage. This tool enables the efficient use of the TPS, allowing research and clinical applications to coexist without conflict. It provides consistency and efficiency throughout the treatment planning process, which may be of great value to clinics with few resources. The impact of this tool on clinical workflow is important, as it not only provides better efficiency, but also increases treatment quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Ayala
- Servicio de Dosimetría y Radioprotección, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Gema Ruiz
- Servicio de Dosimetría y Radioprotección, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Teresa Valdivielso
- Servicio de Dosimetría y Radioprotección, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Palma G, Cella L. A new formalism of Dose Surface Histograms for robust modeling of skin toxicity in radiation therapy. Phys Med 2019; 59:75-78. [PMID: 30928068 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present a new formalism for a robust computation of Dose-Surface Histograms (DSHs) to be exploited in the analysis of surface effects in radiation induced toxicity phenomena. METHODS A new formal recipe for the DSH extraction is described. It is based on the computation of the Dose-Volume Histogram (DVH) on a 3D structure in the limit of vanishing thickness to approach the two-dimensional organ manifold. The theory is customized for the application to skin description. RESULTS The derived formalism resulted in a redefinition of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) and, accordingly, in an extension of the scope of the classical Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) to a DSH-based toxicity modeling. CONCLUSIONS Our approach properly fits the intrinsic 3D nature of the DSH computation issue, and guarantees the rotational invariance and the robustness of the results. The proposed formalism can be easily implemented in treatment planning systems for dose optimization and potentially paves the way to a consistent analysis of radiation-induced morbidity endpoints related to surface effects in hollow organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Palma
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Italian National Research Council, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Laura Cella
- Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, Italian National Research Council, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Hsieh CE, Venkatesulu BP, Lee CH, Hung SP, Wong PF, Aithala SP, Kim BK, Rao A, Tung-Chieh Chang J, Tsang NM, Wang CC, Lee CC, Lin CC, Tseng JH, Chou WC, Wang YC, Krishnan S, Hong JH. Predictors of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease in Eastern and Western Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Proton Beam Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:73-86. [PMID: 30797890 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 02/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify predictors of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS This multicenter study included 136 patients with HCC (eastern, n = 102; western, n = 34) without evidence of intrahepatic tumor progression after PBT. The RILD was defined as ascites with alkaline-phosphatase abnormality, grade ≥3 hepatic toxicity, or Child-Pugh score worsening by ≥2 within 4 months after PBT completion. The proton doses were converted to equivalent doses in 2-GyE fractions. The unirradiated liver volume (ULV) was defined as the absolute liver volume (LV) receiving <1 GyE; the standard liver volume (SLV) was calculated using body surface area. Possible correlations of clinicodosimetric parameters with RILD were examined. RESULTS The mean pretreatment LV was 85% of SLV, and patients with a history of hepatectomy (P < .001) or hepatitis B virus infection (P = .035) had significantly smaller LV/SLV. Nineteen (14%) patients developed RILD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ULV/SLV (P = .001), gross tumor volume (P = .001), and Child-Pugh classification (P = .002) as independent RILD predictors, and mean liver dose and target-delivered dose were not associated with RILD occurrence. A "volume-response" relationship between ULV/SLV and RILD was consistently observed in both eastern and western cohorts. In Child-Pugh class-A patients whose ULV/SLV were ≥50%, 49.9%-40%, 39.9%-30% and <30%, the RILD incidences were 0%, 6%, 16%, and 39% (P < .001), respectively. For the Child-Pugh class-B group, the RILD incidences in patients with ≥60%, 59.9%-40%, and <40% of ULV/SLV were 0%, 14%, and 83% (P = .006), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The ULV/SLV, not mean liver dose, independently predicts RILD in patients with HCC undergoing PBT. The relative and absolute contraindications for Child-Pugh class-A patient's ULV/SLV are <50% and <30%, and <60% and <40% for Child-Pugh class-B patients, respectively. Our results indicate that the likelihood of hepatic complications for PBT is dictated by similar metrics as that for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-En Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China; Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center-UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Hsin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Sheng-Ping Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Pei-Fong Wong
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sathvik Panambur Aithala
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Byung Kyu Kim
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center-UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Arvind Rao
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Ngan-Ming Tsang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Chun-Chieh Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Chung-Chi Lee
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Chen-Chun Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Jeng-Hwei Tseng
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Wen-Chi Chou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Yu-Chao Wang
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center-UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ji-Hong Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China; Department of Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Paganetti H, Blakely E, Carabe-Fernandez A, Carlson DJ, Das IJ, Dong L, Grosshans D, Held KD, Mohan R, Moiseenko V, Niemierko A, Stewart RD, Willers H. Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys 2019; 46:e53-e78. [PMID: 30661238 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The biological effectiveness of proton beams relative to photon beams in radiation therapy has been taken to be 1.1 throughout the history of proton therapy. While potentially appropriate as an average value, actual relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values may differ. This Task Group report outlines the basic concepts of RBE as well as the biophysical interpretation and mathematical concepts. The current knowledge on RBE variations is reviewed and discussed in the context of the current clinical use of RBE and the clinical relevance of RBE variations (with respect to physical as well as biological parameters). The following task group aims were designed to guide the current clinical practice: Assess whether the current clinical practice of using a constant RBE for protons should be revised or maintained. Identifying sites and treatment strategies where variable RBE might be utilized for a clinical benefit. Assess the potential clinical consequences of delivering biologically weighted proton doses based on variable RBE and/or LET models implemented in treatment planning systems. Recommend experiments needed to improve our current understanding of the relationships among in vitro, in vivo, and clinical RBE, and the research required to develop models. Develop recommendations to minimize the effects of uncertainties associated with proton RBE for well-defined tumor types and critical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | - David J Carlson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Indra J Das
- New York University Langone Medical Center & Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn D Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert D Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Evaluating the dosimetric consequences of MLC leaf positioning errors in dynamic IMRT treatments. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396918000705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) positional errors on dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatments through planning simulation. Secondly the sensitivity of IMRT MatriXX device for detecting the MLC leaf positional errors was also evaluated.Materials and methodsIn this study five dynamic IMRT plans, each for brain and head–neck (HN), were retrospectively included. An in-house software was used to introduce random errors (uniform distribution between −2·0 and +2·0 mm) and systematic errors [±0·5, ±0·75, ±1·0 and ±2·0 mm (+: open MLC error and −: close MLC error)]. The error-introduced MLC files were imported into the treatment planning system and new dose distributions were calculated. Furthermore, the dose–volume histogram files of all plans were exported to in-house software for equivalent uniform dose (EUD), tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability calculations. The error-introduced plans were also delivered on LINAC, and the planar fluences were measured by IMRT MatriXX. Further, 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm γ-criteria were used for analysis.ResultsIn planning simulation study, the impact of random errors was negligible and ΔEUD was <0·5±0·7%, for both brain and HN. The impact of systematic errors was substantial, and on average, the maximum change in EUD for systematic errors (close 2 mm) was −10·7±3·1% for brain and −15·5±2·6% for HN.ConclusionsIt can be concluded that the acceptable systematic error was 0·4 mm for brain and 0·3 mm for HN. Furthermore, IMRT MatriXX device was able to detect the MLC errors ≥2 mm in HN and >3 mm errors in brain with 2%/2 mm γ-criteria.
Collapse
|
191
|
Mechanistic Modelling of Radiation Responses. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11020205. [PMID: 30744204 PMCID: PMC6406300 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiobiological modelling has been a key part of radiation biology and therapy for many decades, and many aspects of clinical practice are guided by tools such as the linear-quadratic model. However, most of the models in regular clinical use are abstract and empirical, and do not provide significant scope for mechanistic interpretation or making predictions in novel cell lines or therapies. In this review, we will discuss the key areas of ongoing mechanistic research in radiation biology, including physical, chemical, and biological steps, and review a range of mechanistic modelling approaches which are being applied in each area, highlighting the possible opportunities and challenges presented by these techniques.
Collapse
|
192
|
|
193
|
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical therapy involves the use of radionuclides that are either conjugated to tumor-targeting agents (e.g., nanoscale constructs, antibodies, peptides, and small molecules) or that concentrate in tumors through natural physiological mechanisms that occur predominantly in neoplastic cells. In the latter category, radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer is the prototypical and most widely implemented radiopharmaceutical therapy. In the category of radionuclide-ligand conjugates, antibody and peptide conjugates have been studied extensively. The efficacy of radiopharmaceutical therapy relies on the ability to deliver cytotoxic radiation to tumor cells without causing prohibitive normal tissue toxicity. After some 30 y of preclinical and clinical research, a number of recent developments suggest that radiopharmaceutical therapy is poised to emerge as an important and widely recognized therapeutic modality. These developments include the substantial investment in antibodies by the pharmaceutical industry and the compelling rationale to build upon this already existing and widely tested platform. In addition, the growing recognition that the signaling pathways responsible for tumor cell survival and proliferation are less easily and durably inhibited than originally envisioned has also provided a rationale for identifying agents that are cytotoxic rather than inhibitory. A number of radiopharmaceutical agents are currently undergoing clinical trial investigation; these include beta-particle emitters, such as Lu, that are being used to label antisomatostatin receptor peptides for neuroendocrine cancers and also prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting small molecules for prostate cancer. Alpha-particle-emitting radionuclides have also been studied for radiopharmaceutical therapy; these include At for glioblastoma, Ac for leukemias and prostate cancer, Pb for breast cancer, and Ra for prostate cancer. The alpha emitters have tended to show particular promise, and there is substantial interest in further developing these agents for therapy of cancers that are particularly difficult to treat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Sgouros
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-0014
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
van Haveren R, Heijmen BJM, Breedveld S. Automatically configuring the reference point method for automated multi-objective treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:035002. [PMID: 30566906 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf9fe] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Automated treatment planning algorithms have demonstrated capability in generating consistent and high-quality treatment plans. Their configuration (i.e. determining the algorithm's parameters), however, can be a labour-intensive and time-consuming trial-and-error procedure. Previously, we introduced the reference point method (RPM) for fast automated multi-objective treatment planning. The RPM generates a single Pareto optimal plan for each patient. When the RPM is configured appropriately, this plan has clinically favourable trade-offs between all plan objectives. This paper proposes a new procedure to automatically generate a single configuration of the RPM per tumour site. The procedure was tested for prostate cancer. Planning CT scans of 287 previously treated patients were included in a database, together with corresponding Pareto optimal plans generated using our clinically applied two-phase [Formula: see text]-constraint method (part of Erasmus-iCycle) for automated multi-objective treatment planning. The procedure developed acquires plan characteristics observed in a training set. Based on these, an RPM configuration is automatically generated according to user preferences which specify acceptable differences between training set plans and corresponding RPM generated plans. For example, compared to the training set plans, the RPM generated plans need to have similar PTV coverage, and preferably reduced high rectum dose while slight deteriorations in other objectives are allowed. Training sets of different sizes were tested, and the quality of the resulting RPM configurations was evaluated on the test set (subset of the database not used for training). Using the new procedure, an RPM configuration was generated for each training set. The quality of RPM generated plans was similar or slightly better than that of the corresponding test set plans. The proposed automated configuration procedure greatly reduces the manual configuration workload, and thereby improves the efficiency and effectiveness of an automated clinical treatment planning workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rens van Haveren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
195
|
Dose prescription point in forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy of breast and head/neck cancers. Radiol Phys Technol 2018; 11:382-391. [DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0475-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 09/02/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
196
|
Evaluation of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:179-185. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5053-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
197
|
Validation of Effective Dose as a Better Predictor of Radiation Pneumonitis Risk Than Mean Lung Dose: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 103:403-410. [PMID: 30291994 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To confirm the superiority of effective dose (Deff) over mean lung dose (MLD) for predicting risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP), using data from patients on a randomized trial of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS The prescribed target dose for the 203 evaluated patients was 66 to 74 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 33 to 37 fractions with concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel. Time to grade ≥2 RP was computed from the start of radiation therapy, with disease recurrence or death considered censoring events. Generalized Lyman models of censored time to RP were constructed with MLD or Deff as the dosimetric parameter. Smoking status (current, former, never) was also analyzed. RESULTS Of the 203 patients, 46 experienced grade ≥2 RP (crude incidence 23%) at a median 3.7 months (range, 0.6-12.6 months). The volume parameter estimated for the Deff model was n = 0.5, confirming estimates from earlier studies. Compared with MLD (in which n = 1), the dosimetric parameter Deff, computed using n = 0.5, resulted in a better fit of the Lyman model to the clinical data (P = .010). Using Deff, the model describes RP risk for IMRT and PSPT data combined because no further improvement was found from separate fits (P = .558). Based on Deff, predicted RP risk per patient ranged from 24 percentage points lower to 19 percentage points higher than predictions based on MLD. For patients with similar MLD, Deff predicted higher risk, on average, for PSPT over IMRT. Current smokers had a lower risk of RP compared with former smokers and nonsmokers (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS We used data from a randomized trial to validate our previous finding that Deff with n = 0.5 (corresponding to root mean squared dose) is a better predictor of RP than is MLD. Differences between Deff and MLD indicate that delivering higher doses to smaller lung volumes (vs lower doses to larger volumes) increases RP risk. We further corroborated that current smoking is associated with decreased RP risk.
Collapse
|
198
|
Mihaylov IB, Moros EG. Integral dose based inverse optimization objective function promises lower toxicity in head-and-neck. Phys Med 2018; 54:77-83. [PMID: 30337013 PMCID: PMC9608394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The voxels in a CT data sets contain density information. Besides its use in dose calculation density has no other application in modern radiotherapy treatment planning. This work introduces the use of density information by integral dose minimization in radiotherapy treatment planning for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen HNSCC cases were studied. For each case two intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were created: one based on dose-volume (DV) optimization, and one based on integral dose minimization (Energy hereafter) inverse optimization. The target objective functions in both optimization schemes were specified in terms of minimum, maximum, and uniform doses, while the organs at risk (OAR) objectives were specified in terms of DV- and Energy-objectives respectively. Commonly used dosimetric measures were applied to assess the performance of Energy-based optimization. In addition, generalized equivalent uniform doses (gEUDs) were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed to estimate the performance of this novel inverse optimization paradigm. RESULTS Energy-based inverse optimization resulted in lower OAR doses for equivalent target doses and isodose coverage. The statistical tests showed dose reduction to the OARs with Energy-based optimization ranging from ∼2% to ∼15%. CONCLUSIONS Integral dose minimization based inverse optimization for HNSCC promises lower doses to nearby OARs. For comparable therapeutic effect the incorporation of density information into the optimization cost function allows reduction in the normal tissue doses and possibly in the risk and the severity of treatment related toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivaylo B Mihaylov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Suite 1500, Miami, FL 33136, United States.
| | - Eduardo G Moros
- Radiation Oncology and Diagnostic Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL 33612, United States
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Alevronta E, Skokic V, Wilderäng U, Dunberger G, Sjöberg F, Bull C, Bergmark K, Jörnsten R, Steineck G. Dose-response relationships of the sigmoid for urgency syndrome after gynecological radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1352-1358. [PMID: 29733238 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1468082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To find out what organs and doses are most relevant for 'radiation-induced urgency syndrome' in order to derive the corresponding dose-response relationships as an aid for avoiding the syndrome in the future. MATERIAL AND METHODS From a larger group of gynecological cancer survivors followed-up 2-14 years, we identified 98 whom had undergone external beam radiation therapy but not brachytherapy and not having a stoma. Of those survivors, 24 developed urgency syndrome. Based on the loading factor from a factor analysis, and symptom frequency, 15 symptoms were weighted together to a score interpreted as the intensity of radiation-induced urgency symptom. On reactivated dose plans, we contoured the small intestine, sigmoid colon and the rectum (separate from the anal-sphincter region) and we exported the dose-volume histograms for each survivor. Dose-response relationships from respective risk organ and urgency syndrome were estimated by fitting the data to the Probit, RS, LKB and gEUD models. RESULTS The rectum and sigmoid colon have steep dose-response relationships for urgency syndrome for Probit, RS and LKB. The dose-response parameters for the rectum were D50: 51.3, 51.4, and 51.3 Gy, γ50 = 1.19 for all models, s was 7.0e-09 for RS and n was 9.9 × 107 for LKB. For Sigmoid colon, D50 were 51.6, 51.6, and 51.5 Gy, γ50 were 1.20, 1.25, and 1.27, s was 2.8 for RS and n was 0.079 for LKB. CONCLUSIONS Primarily the dose to sigmoid colon as well as the rectum is related to urgency syndrome among gynecological cancer survivors. Separate delineation of the rectum and sigmoid colon in order to incorporate the dose-response results may aid in reduction of the incidence of the urgency syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftheria Alevronta
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Viktor Skokic
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ulrica Wilderäng
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gail Dunberger
- Department of Health Care Sciences, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fei Sjöberg
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Bull
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karin Bergmark
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rebecka Jörnsten
- Department of Oncology and Pathology Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Steineck
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Youn SH, Cho KH, Kim JY, Ha B, Lim YK, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Yoo H, Gwak HS, Shin SH, Hong EK, Kim HK, Hong JB. Clinical outcome of proton therapy for patients with chordomas. Radiat Oncol J 2018; 36:182-191. [PMID: 30309209 PMCID: PMC6226136 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2018.00164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the clinical outcome of proton therapy (PT) in patients with chordoma. Materials and Methods Fifty-eight patients with chordoma treated with PT between June 2007 and December 2015 at the National Cancer Center, Korea, were retrospectively analyzed. The median total dose was 69.6 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE; range, 64.8 to 79.2 CGE). Local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and diseasespecific survival (DSS) rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Results With the median follow-up of 42.8 months (range, 4 to 174 months), the 5-year LPFS, DMFS, OS, and DSS rates were 87.9%, 86.7%, 88.3%, and 92.9%, respectively. The tumor location was associated with the patterns of failure: the LPFS rates were lower for cervical tumors (57.1%) than for non-cervical tumors (93.1%) (p = 0.02), and the DMFS rates were lower for sacral tumors (53.5%) than for non-sacral tumors (100%) (p = 0.001). The total dose was associated with both the LPFS rate and DMFS rate. The initial tumor size was associated with the DMFS rate, but was not associated with the LPFS rate. Three patients had grade 3 late toxicity with none ≥grade 4. Conclusion PT is an effective and safe treatment in patients with chordomas. The tumor location was associated with the patterns of failure: local failure was common in cervical tumors, and distant failure was common in sacral tumors. Further refinement of PT, such as the utilization of intensity modulated PT for cervical tumors, is warranted to improve the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hee Youn
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kwan Ho Cho
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Joo-Young Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Boram Ha
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Young Kyung Lim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jong Hwi Jeong
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Lee
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Heon Yoo
- Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ho-Shin Gwak
- Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Shin
- Neuro-Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Hong
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Han Kyu Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Je Beom Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|