Controlled trial of captopril in chronic heart failure: a rest and exercise hemodynamic study

Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of enalapril (MK-421) in congestive heart failure

Enalapril, a new long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, was administered orally to 12 patients with stable congestive cardiac failure, NYHA function class III-IV. Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects were evaluated in addition to clinical response. The results of this open pilot study indicated marked reduction of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from 21.8 +/- 5.9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD) to 13.3 +/- 4.5 mm Hg (P less than 0.01) and peripheral resistance from 1837 +/- 860 dynes X sec-1 X cm-5 to 1063 +/- 584 dynes X sec-1 X cm-5 at 6 hr (P less than 0.01). Well-tolerated hypotension with mean arterial pressure from 88.0 +/- 11.6 mm Hg to 73.1 +/- 11.7 mm Hg at 6 hr (P less than 0.01) was recorded. No significant increase in cardiac output was observed. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was powerfully inhibited at the time of peak hemodynamic effect from 25.3 +/- 9.8 U/ml to 4.9 +/- 3.4 U/ml (P less than 0.01) and sustained, but attenuated reduction at 24 hr (8.7 +/- 4.7 U/ml) was observed. All patients reported subjective improvement and this clinical improvement has been sustained during follow-up from 19 to 21 months although baseline hemodynamic parameters at chronic re-catheterization did not demonstrate significant improvement. The pharmacodynamics and toxicity of enalapril as compared to captopril are discussed. The long half-life, low toxicity and gradual onset of action are seen as representing a clinical advantage with regard to patient therapy.

Clinical applications of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Although only recently introduced, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been utilized to treat a wide variety of clinical disorders. Their uses to date, approved by the Food and Drug Administration, have been in the treatment of refractory hypertension and congestive heart failure. However, they have been evaluated with mixed results in numerous other conditions in which the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may play a role. Their current status in the treatment of hypertension, congestive heart failure, and these other conditions is reviewed.

Enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study

A number of studies have shown short-term hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement in patients with congestive heart failure treated with angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors. The long-term efficacy of the oral long-acting converting-enzyme inhibitor enalapril remains to be established in controlled studies. We evaluated this drug in 36 patients with New York Heart Association functional class II to III heart failure who were clinically stable on digoxin and diuretic therapy. After baseline assessment of symptoms, exercise capacity, and results of echocardiographic examination and right heart catheterization, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 5 mg enalapril twice daily (n = 18) or placebo (n = 18) in a double-blind fashion. The two groups had similar clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic characteristics before treatment. After 3 months of treatment, the enalapril group showed a significant improvement as judged by subjective patient impression, functional class, and exercise duration (9.3 +/- 5.7 vs 17.6 +/- 5.6 min; p less than .001). Diuretic dosage was reduced in six patients and increased in one patient, one patient had died and another had been withdrawn from the study. In the placebo group there was no significant change with respect to patient impression, functional class, or exercise duration; diuretic dosage was increased in seven patients and four patients had died. Echocardiographic left ventricular dimensions were significantly reduced and left ventricular shortening fraction significantly increased in the enalapril group but were unchanged in the placebo group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Conceptual dilemmas in the classification of vasodilator drugs for severe chronic heart failure. Advocacy of a pragmatic approach to the selection of a therapeutic agent

Two distinct systems of classifying vasodilator drugs have been developed over the past decade in an attempt to guide the choice of a therapeutic agent for the patient with severe heart failure, but the merits and utility of these systems have not been critically evaluated. Vasodilator drugs may be categorized according to their peripheral site of action: an agent may exert its effects preferentially on systemic arteries, systemic veins, or on both circulations. However, changes in the peripheral circulation cannot be directly translated into an improvement in central hemodynamic variables; furthermore, immediate hemodynamic responses may not be predictive of long-term clinical efficacy. Hence, there is no evidence that characterization of patients into hemodynamic subsets determined by the findings of right heart catheterization improves the clinical outcome of vasodilator therapy in chronic heart failure. An alternative classification system groups vasodilator drugs according to their mechanism of action: an agent may possess direct vasodilating effects or may exert its actions via selective neurohumoral inhibition. However, attempts to identify patients who might be most responsive to neurohumoral antagonism by measuring plasma renin activity or circulating levels of catecholamines before treatment have not been successful in predicting the clinical responses to therapy. Because neither system of drug classification provides the clinician with useful therapeutic guidelines, patients with severe heart failure appear to be best managed using a pragmatic approach in which specific drugs that produce predictable therapeutic benefits with a low frequency of side effects are utilized preferentially. Among presently available vasodilator agents, only captopril and oral isosorbide dinitrate have been shown to produce consistent hemodynamic and clinical improvement with an acceptable degree of adverse reactions.

Lack of relationship between the short-term hemodynamic effects of captopril and subsequent clinical responses

The role of hemodynamic monitoring during the initiation of vasodilator therapy for heart failure remains to be defined, despite the tremendous potential socioeconomic and clinical ramifications. We therefore performed resting and exercise hemodynamic studies before and during the initial 48 hr of captopril therapy in 14 stable patients with New York Heart Association Class II or III chronic congestive heart failure. Their clinical response to therapy was determined by evaluating changes in clinical status and the measured changes in exercise tolerance, heart size, and ejection fraction after 3 months. Significant improvement in each of these indexes was found for the group as a whole, but the baseline hemodynamics and the hemodynamic responses to captopril differed little between the patients showing marked improvement and those exhibiting little or no change. Correlations between the hemodynamic measurements and the changes in clinical class, exercise tolerance, heart size, and ejection fraction were generally poor. Even when they achieved significance, these correlations were too loose to allow prediction of the clinical efficacy of captopril in individual subjects. These findings indicate that the routine use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring during the initiation of captopril is unnecessary and potentially misleading, although such measurements remain valuable for diagnosis, the management of patients with complex conditions, and for investigation. The response to captopril may be best evaluated by serial measurements of exercise tolerance and heart size in addition to clinical assessment.

Long-term captopril therapy for chronic congestive heart failure

Although the short-term hemodynamic and clinical responses to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) are well known, little information is available about the long-term results of captopril therapy. In the present study, 15 stable outpatients received captopril therapy and were followed for a mean of 19 months (range 6 to 27) with serial clinical assessments and measurements of exercise tolerance, ejection fraction (EF) and cardiothoracic ratio. Exercise tolerance on a modified Naughton protocol improved from 10.5 +/- 2.7 to 12.7 +/- 2.4 minutes (mean +/- standard deviation) at 3 months (p less than 0.001), tended to increase progressively up to 12 months and remained significantly increased even after 24 months (9.7 +/- 1.8 vs 13.5 +/- 4.0 minutes, p less than 0.05). However, individual responses were variable; 4 patients did not show measurable improvement. Left ventricular EF increased from 0.20 +/- 0.06 to 0.25 +/- 0.06 (p less than 0.01) at 3 months and remained higher (0.30 +/- 0.12, p less than 0.02) at latest follow-up. Cardiothoracic ratio decreased from 0.59 +/- 0.04 to 0.56 +/- 0.05 (p less than 0.02) at 3 months and remained significantly lower at 12 months and at latest follow-up, although again individual responses were variable. Clinical responses generally correlated with these objective measurements, with clinical classification on a scale modified from the New York Heart Association classification improving from 3.0 +/- 0.6 to 2.3 +/- 0.5 (p less than 0.01) at 3 months and remaining improved throughout the follow-up period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Relation between serum sodium concentration and the hemodynamic and clinical responses to converting enzyme inhibition with captopril in severe heart failure

The relation between pretreatment serum sodium concentration and the early and late effects of captopril was examined in 77 consecutive patients with severe chronic heart failure, in whom cardiac catheterization was performed during initiation of treatment and after 2 to 8 weeks. Two groups of patients were defined: 37 patients had hyponatremia (serum sodium less than 135 mEq/liter, group A) and 40 patients had a normal serum sodium concentration (greater than or equal to 135 mEq/liter, group B). With first doses of captopril, patients in group A showed more marked hemodynamic responses than did patients in group B (p less than 0.02). The changes in mean arterial pressure and left ventricular filling pressure seen with first doses of the drug varied linearly and inversely with the pretreatment serum sodium concentration (r = -0.58 and r = -0.53, respectively); this was likely related to the finding that, before administration of captopril, the serum sodium concentration varied linearly and inversely with the logarithm of the plasma renin activity (r = -0.78). However, the pretreatment serum sodium concentration did not predict the long-term hemodynamic or clinical responses to converting enzyme inhibition. Symptomatic hypotension occurred early in the course of therapy (within 24 hours of initiating captopril therapy) in 9 (12%) of the 77 patients; 8 of these 9 had severe hyponatremia (serum sodium less than 130 mEq/liter) and comprised 53% of the 15 patients in our study with such low serum sodium concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute and long-term response to enalapril in congestive failure

Enalapril, a novel long acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, was given orally to 12 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA functional class III and IV) and cardiomegaly. The optimal dose averaged 17 mg given once-daily. Heart rate, systemic arterial blood pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, right and left ventricular filling pressures and cardiac index were monitored during dose efficacy titration. Eleven patients were recatheterised 3 months later. After stabilisation of cardiac filling pressures, all patients had left ventricular filling pressures in excess of 20 mmHg. Enalapril increased cardiac index acutely by 34% but at 12 weeks follow-up, cardiac index was not different from control levels. Left ventricular filling pressure was reduced acutely by 36% and by 41% at 3 months. Heart rate, systemic arterial and right atrial pressures and plasma concentrations of aldosterone were reduced during the observation period. ACE activity was inhibited at the time of peak haemodynamic effect from 25.3 +/- 9.8 to 4.9 +/- 3.4 U/ml (P less than 0.01). Renin was markedly elevated. These changes were accompanied by marked and sustained clinical improvement and subjective well-being.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in heart failure

Captopril, the first orally effective converting enzyme inhibitor, was administered to 14 patients with chronic heart failure for 6 week periods, in a double-blind crossover comparison with placebo. Captopril improved symptoms and exercise performance, while left ventricular internal dimensions were reduced. The fall in blood pressure induced by captopril was well tolerated. Glomerular filtration rate was reduced and effective renal plasma flow increased on captopril. No decline in body weight or total body sodium was seen, suggesting that a natriuresis had not occurred. Serum and total body potassium rose. Ventricular arrhythmias declined.

Vasodilator and inotropic therapy for severe chronic heart failure: passion and skepticism

Although substantial progress has been made in the last 5 years in the development of vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the management of patients with severe chronic heart failure, much of the enthusiasm that surrounded the introduction of many of these agents has subsequently been tempered by reports of drug failure or adverse reactions. In this review and analysis, currently available vasodilator and inotropic agents are critically and comparatively evaluated to assess their respective advantages and limitations. It is apparent that the ability of most of these drugs to produce substantial clinical benefits in patients with severe heart failure has probably been overstated. Therapy fails to achieve the desired clinical results all too frequently, possibly as the result of: the choice of an ineffective drug; the administration of an effective drug in subtherapeutic doses; the administration of an effective drug to improperly selected patients; the failure of initial hemodynamic benefits to be sustained; the occurrence of severe or serious adverse reactions; and the failure to alter concomitant therapy appropriately. The present analysis indicates that there is no uniformly effective or safe vasodilator or inotropic drug for patients with severe heart failure; all agents have important limitations. Of the available therapeutic choices, however, long-term converting enzyme inhibition appears to produce more consistent hemodynamic and clinical benefits with an acceptable degree of adverse reactions than other pharmacologic approaches for the management of these severely ill patients.

Hemodynamic responses to combined therapy with captopril and hydralazine in patients with severe heart failure

The hemodynamic benefits and safety of combined therapy with captopril and hydralazine were studied during invasive hemodynamic monitoring in 14 patients with severe heart failure. In eight patients, the individual effects of both drugs were evaluated before the administration of combined therapy, whereas hydralazine was added to maintenance captopril therapy in the other six patients. In the first group, captopril alone produced a marked decrease in pulmonary wedge pressure (28 +/- 4 to 18 +/- 5 mm Hg) and mean arterial pressure (85 +/- 20 to 69 +/- 13 mm Hg) (both p less than 0.001) without a significant increase in cardiac index. Hydralazine alone produced a marked increase in cardiac index (1.6 +/- 0.4 to 2.7 +/- 0.5 liters/min per m2) (p less than 0.001), but with a minimal decrease in pulmonary wedge pressure (28 +/- 4 to 23 +/- 4 mm Hg) (p less than 0.05) and without a significant change in mean arterial pressure. The combination of captopril and hydralazine produced an increase in cardiac index similar to that of hydralazine alone and decreases in pulmonary wedge pressure and mean arterial pressure similar to those with captopril alone. Most important, when hydralazine was added to captopril in the entire group of 14 patients, cardiac index increased markedly with little additional decrease in mean arterial pressure and no significant increase in heart rate. The one patient who experienced symptomatic hypotension with combination therapy also had dizziness with captopril alone. Seven of the nine patients maintained on long-term treatment experienced symptomatic improvement. Thus, in patients with severe chronic heart failure, the combined use of captopril and hydralazine is feasible and produces acute hemodynamic improvement superior to that from either drug alone.