Self-reported symptoms after initiation of a protease inhibitor in HIV-infected patients and their impact on adherence to HAART

Placebo practice trials: the best predictor of adherence readiness for HAART among drug users?

PURPOSE

This study assessed the utility of a placebo practice trial in determining adherence readiness among drug users.

METHOD

Participants with histories of drug dependency completed a 2-week practice trial that mimicked HAART (Phase 1), followed by a 2-week observation of adherence to HAART (Phase 2) for those who began antiretroviral therapy during the study period. The primary measure of adherence was electronic monitoring.

RESULTS

There were 201 participants enrolled; 39% met criteria for current drug dependency. Mean adherence to the practice trial was 67%. Of the 184 Phase 1 completers, 83 (45%) initiated HAART prior to the end of the study. Mean adherence to HAART was 74%, including 33 patients (39%) with 90+% adherence. Adherence to the practice trial was correlated with antiretroviral adherence (r =.49, p <.001), and 90+% adherence to the practice trial was an accurate marker of the "adherence readiness" (ability to adhere 90+% on HAART) of 72% of the participants. In multivariate analyses, practice trial adherence was the best independent predictor of antiretroviral adherence, accounting for 19% of the explained variance; other predictors included adherence to recent clinic appointments, cognitive functioning, unstable housing, and adherence self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that a brief placebo practice trial has the potential to provide clinicians and patients with an accurate screening tool for evaluating adherence readiness.

Simplified regimens for treating HIV infection and AIDS

PURPOSE

To review the variables that greatly affect adherence to the complex treatment regimens used in HIV disease and to examine available options that could improve patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Comprehensive review of current medical and scientific literature, drug-prescribing literature, and randomized clinical trials of drug treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective treatment of HIV infection is dependent on consistent adherence to prescribed antiretroviral medications. A large pill burden, multiple daily doses, and adverse events are some of the complexities that negatively impact patient adherence. For example, lipodystrophy and hyperlipidemia are two serious side effects associated with some agents. Once-daily antiretroviral agents offer many advantages over historical treatment options but are associated with possible drawbacks.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Currently, four single agents are available for once-daily administration, and a few others are under investigation. In addition, combination therapy with either dual or boosted protease inhibitor regimens is becoming a popular way of overcoming the poor pharmacokinetic characteristics of individual protease inhibitors.

A medication self-management program to improve adherence to HIV therapy regimens

This study examined whether a self-management intervention based on feedback of adherence performance and principles of social cognitive theory improves adherence to antiretroviral dosing schedules. Forty-three individuals with HIV/AIDS who were starting or switching to a new protease inhibitor regimen were randomly assigned to be in a medication self-management program or usual care control group. The self-management program included skills development exercises, three monthly visits for medication consultations, and monthly feedback of adherence performance using electronic monitors on medication bottles. Participants also completed a 40-item questionnaire that measured self-efficacy to take medications, on schedule, in a variety of situations. Logistic regression analysis indicated that individuals in the self-management group were significantly more likely to take 80% or more of their doses each week than individuals in the control group (n=29, OR=7.8, 95% CI=2.2-28.1). Self-management training with feedback of adherence performance is a potentially useful model for improving adherence to complex regimens in HIV/AIDS care.

Failure to maintain adherence to HAART in a cohort of French HIV-positive injecting drug users

The study, carried out in the French MANIF 2000 cohort of HIV positive patients contaminated through injecting drug use, assessed the impact of patients' sociodemographic and psychological characteristics, behaviors toward drug abuse, and antiretroviral treatment characteristics on the maintenance of adherence to HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapies). A total of 96 patients (30 men and 66 women), who were initially adherent at their first visit after HAART prescription, were considered for analysis. Among these 96 patients, 22 (22.9%) experienced adherence failure defined as a self-reported, non-adherence behavior at any visit before the 18th month of treatment. Logistic regression showed that lack of a stable relationship, active drug injection, and depression were independently associated with adherence failure. Patients' counseling for facilitating maintenance of adherence to HAART over time should focus on prevention of drug use, provision of social support and consider the potential impact of difficulties with treatment on psychological well-being.

Adherence to HAART regimens

The problem of inadequate adherence to prescribed highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) drug regimens to treat HIV infection and AIDS is ubiquitous. Adherence can be inadequate despite both provider and patient understanding of the consequences of nonadherence. Successful long-term treatment of HIV/AIDS requires at least 95% adherence to HAART in order to prevent emergence of drug-resistant HIV variants that lead to regimen failure and limit options for future therapy. Despite the prevalence of inadequate adherence, many patients succeed, and HAART has transformed HIV infection into a chronic illness increasingly managed in primary care. The barriers to adherence observed in HIV treatment resemble barriers to the successful treatment of other chronic diseases: regimen complexity, side effects resulting in poor tolerability, patient lifestyle factors, and patient-provider relationships. Treatment of HIV infection has shown that patient-provider collaboration can result in the selection of a lifestyle-tailored regimen characterized by convenient dosing, low pill burden, and tolerable side effects that enhances adherence, effectiveness, and the patient's willingness to remain on anti-HIV therapy long term. This review focuses on the current understanding of adherence reporting, improvement of adherence, and, hence, improvement of treatment outcomes in HIV infection and AIDS.

Results of a phase 2 clinical trial at 48 weeks (AI424-007): a dose-ranging, safety, and efficacy comparative trial of atazanavir at three doses in combination with didanosine and stavudine in antiretroviral-naive subjects

Three dose levels of the protease inhibitor (PI) atazanavir (200, 400, and 500 mg once daily) were compared with nelfinavir (750 mg three times daily) when given both as monotherapy and in combination with didanosine and stavudine in 420 antiretroviral-naive subjects infected with HIV-1. Subjects received monotherapy for 2 weeks, followed by combination therapy for 46 weeks. After 48 weeks, mean change from baseline in HIV RNA (-2.57 to -2.33 log 10 copies/mL), the proportion of subjects with HIV RNA <400 copies/mL (56%-64%) and <50 copies/mL (28%-42%), and mean increases in CD4 cell count (185-221 cells/mm 3) were comparable across treatment groups. Diarrhea was two to three times more common in the nelfinavir group (61% of subjects) than in the atazanavir groups (23%-30% of subjects, <.0001 versus nelfinavir), and jaundice occurred only in atazanavir-treated subjects (6%, 6%, and 12% in the 200-, 400-, and 500-mg groups, respectively) ( <.03 for all atazanavir regimens vs. nelfinavir). Mean percent change from baseline in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was significantly less in the atazanavir groups (-7% to 4%) than in the nelfinavir group (31%) ( <.0001). In conclusion, once-daily atazanavir is a potent, safe, and well tolerated PI that rapidly and durably suppresses HIV RNA and durably increases CD4 cell count in antiretroviral-naive subjects. Through 48 weeks, atazanavir was not associated with clinically relevant increases in total cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, or fasting triglycerides. In comparison, nelfinavir was associated with prompt, marked, and sustained elevations in these parameters of a magnitude that suggests they are clinically relevant.

Health-related quality of life after 1 year of highly active antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the impact of the first year of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

Medical data for patients in the French APROCO cohort were collected at enrollment (M0) and month 12 (M12). A self-administered questionnaire gathered information about HRQL (Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey) and toxicity-related symptoms. Using the twenty-fifth percentile of HRQL scales in the French population as a threshold, patients with normal values in at least three mental and three physical scales were considered to have a "normal HRQL." RESULTS. Of the 1053 patients followed through M12, HRQL data at M0 and M12 were available for 654. Among the 233 patients with a normal baseline HRQL, 63 (27.0%) experienced a deterioration of HRQL at M12. Among the 421 patients with a low baseline HRQL, 121 achieved a normal HRQL at M12. Logistic regression showed that factors independently associated with a normal HRQL at M12 were normal baseline HRQL, baseline CD4 count <500 cells/mm, time since HIV diagnosis <8 years, undetectable HIV-RNA at M12, and lower number of self-reported symptoms at M12.

CONCLUSION

An assessment of HRQL should be integrated to efficacy outcomes to evaluate and compare long-term strategies properly and to optimize the durability of response to antiretroviral therapy.

Treatment-related factors and highly active antiretroviral therapy adherence

Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) plays a critical role in the effectiveness of HIV treatment. Nevertheless, the complexity of regimens and frequent side effects make HAART extraordinarily difficult to take, and many HIV-infected persons fail to adhere. The current study offers an overview of the relationship between adherence and antiretroviral treatment-related variables. As for other chronic diseases, medication regimen complexity also has an impact on adherence in the management of HIV infection. In particular, the authors discuss the effect of pill burden, dosing frequency, dietary instructions, number and type of different medications prescribed, short- and long-term side effects, convenience, and ability to incorporate the treatment regimen into a daily routine. Medication side effects are common in HAART-treated persons and are associated with concurrent and future nonadherence. Simplification of regimens, adjustment of the drug schedule to the patient's specific lifestyle, and anticipation and self-management of side effects are treatment-based strategies to optimize HAART adherence and ensure the most effective, convenient, safe, and well-tolerated antiretroviral treatment.

Correlates and predictors of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: overview of published literature

Knowledge of factors associated with medication adherence could help HIV clinicians to target persons in need of intervention, design these interventions, and help researchers to plan studies of adherence. This review summarizes the results of 20 studies investigating the issue of barriers to optimal highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) adherence. Only a few determinants were consistently associated with nonadherence. Symptoms and adverse drug effects, psychologic distress, lack of social or family support, complexity of the HAART regimen, low patient self-efficacy, and inconvenience of treatment were the factors most consistently associated with nonadherence. There were inconsistent findings regarding the relationship of adherence and the following variables: sociodemographic characteristics, substance abuse, depressive symptoms, quality of life, CD4+ cell count, knowledge and beliefs about treatment, patients' satisfaction with health care, and patient-provider relationship. A synthesis of findings relating various factors to adherence to HAART is difficult to reach because of several limitations of the existing body of research. These limitations concern the measurement of adherence, the assessment of correlates and predictors of adherence, the study population, and the study design.

Relationship between HAART adherence and adipose tissue alterations

Adipose tissue alterations (ATA), which are common among persons treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), can have substantial psychologic repercussions, with a subsequent negative impact on the patient's quality of life and on HAART adherence. However, the cross-sectional nature of the studies precludes establishing the direction and causality of the relationship. The authors evaluated the longitudinal relationship between ATA and adherence to HAART. The analysis included all participants in the AdICoNA and the LipolCoNA substudies of the Italian Cohort Naive Antiretrovirals (ICoNA). Adherence was assessed using a 16-item self-administered questionnaire, which also included a question on self-perceived fat accumulation experienced during the past 4 weeks. ATA was diagnosed by physicians at enrollment and evaluated every 6 months thereafter. There were 207 patients, with a median age of 35 years; 73% were men; and 34% acquired HIV through injection drug use. At baseline, nonadherence was reported by 63% of participants, and ATA was self-perceived by 15% and clinically diagnosed in 25%. Using Cox regression analysis, patients with good adherence at baseline were more likely to develop ATA (RH = 2.58; 95% CI, 1.09-6.11) and developed it sooner. Self-perceived ATA at baseline was independently related to subsequent nonadherence (OR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.01-22.4), but clinically diagnosed ATA was not (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.37-1.61). Patients' adherence to HAART is a dynamic process that interacts with ATA. Better adherence is associated with a higher risk of subsequent occurrence of ATA, while patient-perceived onset of morphologic alterations can reduce adherence to antiretroviral therapy.

Predictors of antiretroviral adherence as measured by self-report, electronic monitoring, and medication diaries

This study reports on the prevalence and predictors of adherence as measured by self-report, medication diaries, and electronic monitoring. A sample of 180 patients receiving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiretroviral therapy were randomized to one of three adherence surveillance methods (electronic monitoring caps, patient medication diaries, no surveillance control group) for 4 weeks, with adherence measured by self-report at study end point; 173 (96%) participants completed the study. Most participants were male (82%), non-white (68%), and unemployed (84%); mean self-reported CD4 count was 406 cells/mm,3 and 31% reported having undetectable viral load. The three methods of adherence measurement revealed moderate (electronic monitoring: 80.6%) to high (self-report: 93.7%; diaries: 92.6%) rates of adherence. Although there were differences across adherence measures, variables that were identified as correlates of lower adherence by all three methods included living with others or having a larger household, current symptomatology, and cognitive functioning deficits. This consensus across adherence measures strengthens the validity of these identified predictors and their potential value in informing the development of adherence interventions, as well as increases the validity of the three adherence measures.

Ethical reflections on pharmacogenetics and DNA banking in a cohort of HIV-infected patients

The aim of this study was to analyse ethical issues concerning the storage of human biological samples to be used in genetic analyses and pharmacogenetic research based on a French experience of DNA banking in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients started on a protease inhibitor-containing treatment. We describe the ethical issues raised during the establishment of a DNA bank, including questions dealing with autonomy, benefit to the patient, information sharing and confidentiality as well as guarantees concerning the storage and use of DNA. The practical applications of themes illustrated theoretically in the literature are discussed. Most of the points raised are not specific to HIV, but some of them may be more accurate due to the characteristics of the HIV population, which is more involved in the social debate through the community life and the increased risk of stigmatization. Our results are summarized in the memorandum and consent form presented in the Appendices. One issue still open to discussion is the way the results of genetic data will be given to the patients. This work should allow other researchers and members of evaluation committees to enrich their considerations and should stimulate discussion on this topic.

Predicting death from HIV/AIDS: a case-control study from Florida public HIV/AIDS clinics

BACKGROUND

After markedly decreasing for 3 years, HIV/AIDS mortality declined only slightly in 1999.

METHODS

The authors conducted a case-control study in four Florida urban public health HIV clinics to evaluate modifiable factors associated with HIV/AIDS mortality in a non-research setting. Structured chart review was conducted for 120 case-patients who died in 1999 and for 240 randomly selected control-patients. Risk factors associated with death in univariate analysis were entered into three conceptually related, matched logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In the final multivariate model, homelessness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 9.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.34-42.5), Medicaid insurance (AOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.43-6.74), having a documented adherence problem (AOR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.64-7.47), injection drug use (AOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.11-5.43), non-specific liver failure (AOR, 76.9; 95% CI, 6.79-870.9), interrupted highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) secondary to side effects (AOR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.46-10.9), and not receiving HAART (AOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.03-6.68) were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to medical and clinical indicators, several sociobehavioral-demographic factors remained important throughout the multivariate analysis. Improvement in care should include a focus on social circumstances of infected people. Special attention to the homeless, those with adherence problems, and those with liver disease is clearly indicated.

Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) in HIV-infected patients: from a predictive to a dynamic approach

To-date, most socio-behavioural research about HTV-infected patients' adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) has been based on cross-sectional studies. The French APROCO cohort gave us the opportunity to conjointly analyse the relationships between short-term adherence to HAART and HIV-infected patients' characteristics before initiation of treatment on the one hand, factors related to patients' subjective experience with HAART on the other hand. At the fourth-month follow-up visit (M4) after first prescription of HAART (M0), 26.7% of our sample of 445 patients self-reported non-adherence behaviour. Some patients' characteristics at M0 (younger age, poor housing conditions, lack of social support, and problems of adherence with previous antiretroviral regimens) were related to non-adherence at M4 in multivariate analysis. Non-adherence at M4 was, however, also related to the evolutions that affected a number of factors between M0 and M4: levels of depression, symptoms associated with treatment side effects, perception of individual state of health, beliefs towards effectiveness and toxicity of HAART. increases in alcohol and tobacco consumption, as well as contacts with other physicians than hospital HAART prescribers. Our prospective study brings additional evidence that even short-term non-adherence cannot be reliably predicted on the sole basis of a few a priori patient characteristics that clinicians could easily identify before initiation of HAART. It suggests that a dynamic approach to adherence, continuously monitoring the impact of experience with HAART on patients' daily lives, is needed for improving management of HIV/AIDS care.

Impact of discontinuation of initial protease inhibitor therapy on further virological response in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Although discontinuation of antiretroviral drug therapy is common, the impact on outcome in routine clinical practice is unknown. The Antiprotéases Cohorte (APROCO) Cohort Study enrolled 1281 patients at the time they started a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen from 1997 through 1999. After a median duration of follow-up of 20 months, 51% of patients had discontinued their initial PI. Prospectively recorded reasons for discontinuation were intolerance (52% of patients), poor adherence (22%), and failure of therapy (15%). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, only discontinuation due to poor adherence was associated with a lower frequency of human immunodeficiency virus RNA level in plasma of <500 copies/mL 12 months after initiation of therapy (odds ratio, 0.27 vs. no change; P<.0001); discontinuation due to intolerance was not associated with virological response (odds ratio, 0.89; P=.58). Patients experiencing intolerance should be reassured that changing therapy will probably not be harmful. Multidisciplinary efforts should concentrate on ways to avoid discontinuation of treatment for adherence reasons.

The dynamic of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy: results from the French National APROCO cohort

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to describe the evolution of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) over a 20-month period and its relationship with virologic success.

METHODS

Self-reported adherence, clinical, and virologic data were collected 4 (M4), 12 (M12), and 20 (M20) months after initiation of a protease inhibitor-containing regimen in the French APROCO cohort. At each visit, patients were classified as nonadherent, moderately, or highly adherent, and HIV plasma RNA was determined.

RESULTS

Among the 762 patients who were regularly followed until M20, the 436 patients who answered to all questionnaires, including adherence measurement, were selected for the analysis. The proportion of highly adherent patients was 55.7%, 62.2%, and 60.3% at M4, M12, and M20, respectively. A total of 137 patients (31.4%) was "always," 225 (51.6%) "sometimes," and 74 (17.0%) "never" "highly adherent" during follow-up. After multiple adjustment for known baseline predictors, virologic success after 20 months of HAART was more likely achieved in patients who were always (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.02 [1.64-5.58]) or sometimes (OR [95% CI], 2.15 [1.24-3.74]) "highly adherent."

CONCLUSION

Adherence behavior is a dynamic process. Continued adherence was associated with better response to therapy and should be encouraged to reduce the risk of virologic failure.