Systematic review of medication errors in pediatric patients

Physician order entry or nurse order entry? Comparison of two implementation strategies for a computerized order entry system aimed at reducing dosing medication errors

BACKGROUND

Despite the significant effect of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in reducing nonintercepted medication errors among neonatal inpatients, only a minority of hospitals have successfully implemented such systems. Physicians' resistance and users' frustration seem to be two of the most important barriers. One solution might be to involve nurses in the order entry process to reduce physicians' data entry workload and resistance. However, the effect of this collaborative order entry method in reducing medication errors should be compared with a strictly physician order entry method.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a collaborative order entry method consisting of nurse order entry (NOE) followed by physician verification and countersignature is as effective as a strictly physician order entry (POE) method in reducing nonintercepted dose and frequency medication errors in the neonatal ward of an Iranian teaching hospital.

METHODS

A four-month prospective study was designed with two equal periods. During the first period POE was used and during the second period NOE was used. In both methods, a warning appeared when the dose or frequency of the prescribed medication was incorrect that suggested the appropriate dosage to the physicians. Physicians' responses to the warnings were recorded in a database and subsequently analyzed. Relevant paper-based and electronic medical records were reviewed to increase credibility.

RESULTS

Medication prescribing for 158 neonates was studied. The rate of nonintercepted medication errors during the NOE period was 40% lower than during the POE period (rate ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] .50, .71;P < .001). During the POE period, 80% of nonintercepted errors occurred at the prescription stage, while during the NOE period, 60% of nonintercepted errors occurred in that stage. Prescription errors decreased from 10.3% during the POE period to 4.6% during the NOE period (P < .001), and the number of warnings with which physicians complied increased from 44% to 68% respectively (P < .001). Meanwhile, transcription errors showed a nonsignificant increase from the POE period to the NOE period. The median error per patient was reduced from 2 during the POE period to 0 during the NOE period (P = .005). Underdose and curtailed and prolonged interval errors were significantly reduced from the POE period to the NOE period. The rate of nonintercepted overdose errors remained constant between the two periods. However, the severity of overdose errors was lower in the NOE period (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

NOE can increase physicians' compliance with warnings and recommended dose and frequency and reduce nonintercepted medication dosing errors in the neonatal ward as effectively as POE or even better. In settings where there is major physician resistance to implementation of CPOE, and nurses are willing to participate in the order entry and are capable of doing so, NOE may be considered a beneficial alternative order entry method.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs in pediatrics

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and barriers to implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in pediatrics.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

In December 2008, we surveyed the pediatric members of the Emerging Infections Network, a network of infectious diseases consultants located throughout North America. Participants responded regarding whether their hospital had or planned to develop an ASP, its characteristics, barriers to improvement or implementation, and perceptions about antimicrobial resistance.

RESULTS

Of 246 pediatric infectious disease consultants surveyed, 147 (60%) responded. Forty-five respondents (33%) reported having an ASP, and 25 (18%) were planning a program. The percentage of respondents from freestanding children's hospitals who were planning ASPs was higher than the percentage of respondents from other settings who were planning ASPs (P = .04). Most existing programs were developed before 2000 and had a limited number of full-time equivalent staff, and few programs used a prospective audit-and-feedback structure. Many programs were not monitoring important end points associated with ASPs, including cost and number of antibiotic-days. The major barriers to implementation of an ASP were lack of resources, including funding, time, and personnel, noted by more than 50% of respondents. Regardless of the presence of an ASP, respondents perceived antibiotic resistance as a more significant problem nationally than at their local hospital (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ASPs in pediatrics is limited, and opportunities exist to improve current programs.

Evaluation of inpatient admissions and potential antimicrobial and analgesic dosing errors in overweight children

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of overweight/obesity in US children has increased over the past several decades. Routine use of weight-based dosing of medications could potentially result in over- or underdosing in these children.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the percentage of admissions of children with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to the 85th percentile for age and sex and the mean error rate per admission in the overweight versus control group.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, preliminary study of children aged 5-12 years who were admitted to a children's hospital over a period of 6 months. The overweight group included children with a BMI greater than or equal to the 85th percentile; the control group included children with a BMI less than the 85th percentile. Dose appropriateness was assessed, using 2 references. An overdose was defined as: (1) total mg/kg/day or mg/kg/dose greater than or equal to 110% of the maximum recommended pediatric dose, (2) total mg/day greater than the adult maximum recommended dose, or (3) greater than the recommended number of doses per day. An underdose was defined as: (1) total mg/kg/day or mg/kg/dose less than or equal to 90% of the minimum recommended pediatric dose, or (2) fewer than the recommended number of doses per day. Baseline comparisons between groups were done via Student's t-tests and chi2 analysis, when appropriate, with an a priori alpha of p less than or equal to 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 839 admissions representing 699 patients were included. The overweight group included 278 (33.1%) admissions. Comparison of overall mean error rate per admission revealed a statistically significant increase in dosing errors for overweight patients (0.4 +/- 0.6 vs 0.3 +/- 0.6; p = 0.030), with underdose errors occurring more frequently than overdose errors (0.3 +/- 0.6 vs 0.2 +/- 0.5; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Overweight children accounted for one-third of admissions, and the results of this study suggest that these patients are at greater risk for errors in dosing than are children of age- and sex-appropriate weight. This study did not assess clinical outcomes; however, overweight children could be at increased risk for therapeutic failures or adverse effects.

[Security in medication use process: state-of-play report in 21 hospital pharmacies in Aquitaine (France)]

BACKGROUND

Failures may occur in each part of the medication use process. This study aimed to evaluate the barriers existing in hospital pharmacies in order to prevent medication errors and to help institutions to make improvement actions.

METHODS

Within the framework of the SECURIMED project, risk assessment visit (interviews, observations, analysis of adverse event scenario by professionals...) were conducted in volunteer hospital pharmacies. A restitution meeting, after visit in each pharmacy permitted exchanges between visitors and professionals on barriers and weaknesses and then on solutions to reduce identified risks.

RESULTS

Twenty-one hospital pharmacies participated. Despite presence of safeguards in some pharmacies, many weaknesses were retrieved (multiplicity of process, lack of resources...) and clinical pharmacy was not enough developed.

CONCLUSION

This project has led to an overview of the situation in Aquitaine, and created a regional dynamic to improve the medication system safety.

Incidence, preventability, and impact of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and potential ADEs in hospitalized children in New Zealand: a prospective observational cohort study

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are an important problem in all hospitalized patients as these events represent medication-related patient harm. Few epidemiologic data exist regarding ADEs in the pediatric inpatient setting and, in particular, the economic impact of such ADEs upon the healthcare sector. To evaluate the incidence, preventability, and seriousness of ADEs and potential ADEs occurring in hospitalized children and to examine the cost implications of these ADEs. This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in the pediatric, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and postnatal wards of a university-affiliated urban general hospital in Dunedin, New Zealand (NZ). The study population was all patients admitted to these wards for >24 hours over a 12-week period from 18 March 2002 to 9 June 2002. Medication-related events were identified by chart review, attendance at multidisciplinary clinical meetings, parent/carer/child interviews, and voluntary and verbally solicited reports from staff. All suspected medication-related events were reviewed by a panel of three health professionals who independently categorized the events and rated them for seriousness, preventability, and causality, using a standardized reviewer form. Costs attributable to ADEs were calculated using both the average cost of a bed day, and specific costs for diagnostic groupings. The main outcome measures of the study were ADEs and potential ADEs. There were 495 eligible study patients, who had a total of 520 admissions and 3037 patient-days of admission, during which 3160 prescription episodes were written. There were 67 ADEs, of which 38 (56.7%) were classified as preventable, and 77 potential ADEs. ADEs occurred at a rate of 2.1 per 100 prescription episodes, 12.9 per 100 admissions, and 22.1 per 1000 patient-days. Potential ADEs occurred at a rate of 2.4 per 100 prescription episodes, 14.6 per 100 admissions, and 25 per 1000 patient-days. Although the greatest number (and rate per 100 admissions) of ADEs occurred in NICU patients, surgical pediatric ward patients had the greatest rate of ADEs per 1000 patient-days. Few events occurred in postnatal patients. Forty-six percent of ADEs were classified as being serious; 15% were deemed to result in persistent disability or were classified as life threatening. Potential ADEs were deemed more likely to be serious with 82% classified as potentially serious events; 33% were deemed as having the potential to result in persistent disability, or the potential to cause a life-threatening event. Fifteen ADEs were judged to have caused the hospital admission or to have prolonged hospital stay. The total number of days attributed to ADEs was 92 (range 1-26 days); of these, 58 were deemed preventable days and 34 non-preventable days. This extrapolates to a total annual cost of $NZ235 214 (2002 values) to the pediatric service, subdivided into $NZ148 287 for preventable ADEs and $NZ86 927 for non-preventable ADEs. ADEs and potential ADEs represent a considerable hazard for the pediatric inpatient population and ADEs represent a large cost imposition upon the healthcare sector. Over half of the ADEs were deemed preventable. This highlights the importance of developing strategies to prevent and ameliorate ADEs both to improve the quality of patient care and to reduce healthcare costs.

The effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and decision support system on medication errors in the neonatal ward: experiences from an Iranian teaching hospital

Medication dosing errors are frequent in neonatal wards. In an Iranian neonatal ward, a 7.5 months study was designed in three periods to compare the effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) without and with decision support functionalities in reducing non-intercepted medication dosing errors in antibiotics and anticonvulsants. Before intervention (Period 1), error rate was 53%, which did not significantly change after the implementation of CPOE without decision support (Period 2). However, errors were significantly reduced to 34% after that the decision support was added to the CPOE (Period 3; P < 0.001). Dose errors were more often intercepted than frequency errors. Over-dose was the most frequent type of medication errors and curtailed-interval was the least. Transcription errors did not reduce after the CPOE implementation. Physicians ignored alerts when they could not understand why they appeared. A suggestion is to add explanations about these reasons to increase physicians' compliance with the system's recommendations.

[Medication errors in hospitalised patients]

BACKGROUND

Medication errors can arise both during prescription and administration (dispensing and distribution) of drugs. Little is known about types of medication errors in Norwegian hospitals.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

All medication errors reported at St. Olav's Hospital from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2006 were reviewed and analysed.

RESULTS

610 reports were identified. The most common cause of reporting (39 %) was prescription of a different dose from the one prescribed. Other frequent causes were administration of a different drug than the one prescribed (17 %), inadvertent subcutaneous infusion of an intravenous drug (15 %), and that the drug was given to another patient (12 %). The errors were almost exclusively reported by nurses. In 107 cases (18 %), precautions had been taken to reduce the extent of injury after the error had been identified. The causes of errors could be classified in three main categories: Nonvigilance caused by stress, lack of appropriate routines or violation of them, and lack of appropriate skills/negligence.

INTERPRETATION

Changes of routines, improved education in existing routines, and increased pharmacological competence may contribute to prevention of medication errors.

Antimicrobial prescription errors in hospitalized children: role of antimicrobial stewardship program in detection and intervention

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are an effective strategy to ensure that antibiotics are used in accordance with scientific evidence to improve patient outcome, minimize antimicrobial (AM) resistance, and reduce hospital costs. The article describes the impact of the implementation of an ASP on AM prescription errors.

METHODS

Prospective, single-center study performed at a tertiary pediatric teaching hospital that actively monitored 13 targeted AMs (amikacin, amphotericin B, cefepime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, levofloxacin, linezolid, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, tobramycin, vancomycin, and voriconazole) and microbiology data. The ASP was implemented using CareNet and PharmNet. An infectious disease physician and pharmacist determined the need for intervention.

RESULTS

The authors screened 5564 dispensed prescriptions of the 13 targeted AMs. The rate of AM errors associated with these was 0.09/1000 doses administered and 5 errors/1000 patient days.

CONCLUSIONS

Active surveillance and optimization of computerized physician order entry system allows early detection and intervention of AMs prescriptions errors in hospitalized children.

Preprinted order sets as a safety intervention in pediatric sedation

OBJECTIVES

Implement preprinted packets for pediatric procedural sedations to increase documentation compliance and decrease medication ordering errors.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of pediatric inpatients undergoing procedural sedation before and after implementation of a preprinted packet including an order set, consent form, and sedation monitoring form. Patient charts before and after the intervention were reviewed for completeness of medical documentation, correct medication dosages, and adverse events. Chi2 or Fisher exact test was used to determine preintervention vs postintervention differences.

RESULTS

Forty-two charts preintervention and 42 postintervention were reviewed. Documentation compliance increased on consent forms (P < .001), procedure notes (P = .113), and sedation monitoring forms (P = .003), while dating and timing of order forms decreased. Ordering of resuscitation equipment (P = .12), documentation of American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status classification (P < .001) and allergies (P < .001), and postsedation orders (P < .001) also increased. Medications ordered using unit/kg increased 43% (P < .05). Medication ordering errors for sedation agents decreased 64% (P < .001). Ordering of appropriate reversal agents increased 73% (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing preprinted physician orders, consent forms, and prepared packets increased documentation compliance and ordering of reversal agents and resuscitation equipment. Medication dosage ordering errors decreased.

Educational strategy to reduce medication errors in a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of a comprehensive preventive educational strategy on the number and type of drug errors in the prescription process in a regional neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

DESIGN

Medication errors during prescription were recorded in a 41 bed, level III regional neonatal unit by a pharmacist. Data were retrieved from handwritten doctor's orders and introduced at bedsite into an e-database. Each prescription, not related to enteral and parenteral nutrition and blood products, was evaluated for dosage, units, route and dosing interval. The study was developed in three phases: pilot phase to know the baseline drug error rate and estimate sample size; pre-intervention (4182 drug orders reviewed); and post-intervention seven months after a comprehensive preventive educational intervention consisting sessions about drug errors and study's aims was implemented.

RESULTS

After the preventive educational intervention was implemented, the prescription error rate and the percentage of registers with one or more incident decreased significantly from 20.7 to 3% (p < 0.001) and from 19.2 to 2.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Simultaneously, an improvement in correct identification of the prescribing physician was registered (from 1.3 to 78.2%). The rest of items analysed were similar in both periods.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a structured preventive educational intervention for health professionals in a regional NICU reduced the medication error rate, possibly by the dissemination of a patient safety culture.

Novel uses of insulin syringes to reduce dosing errors: a retrospective chart review of enoxaparin whole milligram dosing

Enoxaparin is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) commonly used for thromboprophylaxis children. Enoxaparin dosing is based on patients' weight and results in decimal dosing. Due to the high concentration of enoxaparin the resultant decimal dose makes precise measurement difficult. Dilution is necessary and often results in ten-fold medication administration errors [Ghaleb MA, Barber N, Franklin BD, Yeung VWS, Khaki ZF, Wong ICK. Systematic review of medication errors in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother Oct 2006;40(10):1766-76, Raju TN, Kecskes S, Thornton JP, Perry M, Feldman S. Medication errors in neonatal and paediatric intensive-care units. Lancet Aug 12 1989;2(8659):374-6]. Enoxaparin may be administered in whole milligram doses via insulin syringe, where one milligram of enoxaparin equals one unit on the 100 unit graduated insulin syringe.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of 514 children. Data was collected on underlying diagnosis, reason for anticoagulation, anti-Xa levels, hemorrhagic events, and medication errors identified.

OUTCOME

to determine the occurrence rate of supra-therapeutic anticoagulation as indicated by anti-Xa levels >1.0 u/ml, when enoxaparin doses are rounded up to the whole milligram, and are administered using insulin syringes. The secondary objectives were to determine if the supra-therapeutic anti-Xa levels were associated with hemorrhagic events. To determine if children achieved and maintained therapeutic anti-Xa range using whole milligram dosing and to evaluate the impact of utilizing insulin syringes for administration on reducing dose measurement errors.

RESULTS

All 514 patients were prescribed whole milligram enoxaparin dosing, and achieved therapeutic anti-Xa within a mean time of 2 days. No infant or child required decimal doses to achieve therapeutic levels. Five children achieved an initial supra-therapeutic anti-Xa level (1.04 -1.36 U/ml), requiring a single whole milligram dose decrease. There were no associated hemorrhagic events.

CONCLUSION

Whole milligram enoxaparin dosing administered via an insulin syringe safely and effectively, achieved therapeutic levels in infants and children. The reduced incidence of enoxaparin dosing errors suggests that whole milligram enoxaparin dosing via an insulin syringe is a method that should be considered for standard of care.

Medication errors in the ambulatory treatment of pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Of 361 reports of errors involving pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder from 2003 to 2005, 82% reached the patient but were not harmful; more serious errors were rare.

Impact of a prescription review program on the accuracy and safety of discharge prescriptions in a pediatric hospital setting

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if a prescription review service, at the time of discharge, enhances the accuracy and safety of prescriptions written at an academic pediatric hospital.

METHODS

The study took place over a 30-day period and included prescriptions written for patients being discharged from the General Pediatric and Pediatric Intensive Care Services at the University of Maryland Hospital for Children, a 120-bed academic pediatric hospital. Discharge prescriptions were faxed to the Inpatient Pediatric Pharmacy where they were reviewed by a pediatric clinical pharmacist. Specific review criteria were aimed at detecting prescribing errors that included patient identification, medication selection, dosing, and therapy omission. A prescriber was notified via alpha page when errors were identified and advised on corrective measures. Interventions were compiled and analyzed to determine the overall impact of the discharge prescription review program.

RESULTS

Over the 30-day period, 74 discharge prescriptions were reviewed by a pediatric clinical pharmacist. At least one prescribing error was detected in 81% of the prescriptions reviewed. Overall, 101 prescribing errors were documented and included patient identification, medication selection and dose calculation errors. The estimated cost-savings attributed to the interventions is approximately $7670.

CONCLUSION

Through the discharge prescription review program, the pediatric clinical pharmacists were able to make interventions on the majority of prescriptions reviewed. The types of errors that required interventions have been identified as potential sources for major medication errors in the pediatric population. We concluded that the review of discharge prescriptions by a pediatric clinical pharmacist was an effective method of preventing prescribing errors in the pediatric environment.

Medication errors in older people with mental health problems: a review

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarise published data on medication errors in older people with mental health problems.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that investigated medication errors in older people with mental health problems. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PHARMLINE, COCHRANE COLLABORATION and PsycINFO were searched electronically. Any studies identified were scrutinized for further references. The title, abstract or full text was systematically reviewed for relevance.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from eight studies. In total, information about 728 errors (459 administration, 248 prescribing, 7 dispensing, 12 transcribing, 2 unclassified) was available. The dataset related almost exclusively to inpatients, frequently involved non-psychotropics, and the majority of the errors were not serious.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to methodology issues it was impossible to calculate overall error rates. Future research should concentrate on serious errors within community settings, and clarify potential risk factors.

Errors in preparation and administration of intravenous medications in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of medication errors that occurred during the preparation and administration of IV drugs in an intensive care unit.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a 12-bed intensive care unit of one of the largest teaching hospitals in Tehran.

DESIGN

Data were collected over 16 randomly selected days at different medication round times, between July and September 2006. A trained observer accompanied nurses during intravenous (IV) drug rounds. Medication errors were recorded during the observation times of IV drug administration and preparation. Drugs with the highest rate of use in the intensive care unit (ICU) were selected. Details of the process of preparation and administration of the selected drugs were compared to an informed checklist which was prepared using reference books and manufacturers' instructions.

RESULTS

We observed a total of 524 preparations and administrations. The calculated number of opportunities for error was 4040. The number of errors identified were 380/4040 (9.4%). Of those, 33.6% were related to the preparation process and 66.4% to the administration process. The most common type of error (43.4%) was the injection of bolus doses faster than the recommended rate. Amikacin was involved in the highest rate of error (11%) among all the selected medications. It was found that the IV rounds conducted at 9:a.m. had the highest rate of error (19.8%). No significant correlation was found between the rate of error and the nurses' age, sex, qualification, work experience, marital status, and type of working contract (permanent or temporary).

CONCLUSIONS

Since our system is devoid of a well-organized reporting system, errors are not detected and consequently not prevented. Administrators need to take the initiative of developing systems that guarantee safe medication administration.

Interventions to reduce dosing errors in children: a systematic review of the literature

Children are a particularly challenging group of patients when trying to ensure the safe use of medicines. The increased need for calculations, dilutions and manipulations of paediatric medicines, together with a need to dose on an individual patient basis using age, gestational age, weight and surface area, means that they are more prone to medication errors at each stage of the medicines management process. It is already known that dose calculation errors are the most common type of medication error in neonatal and paediatric patients. Interventions to reduce the risk of dose calculation errors are therefore urgently needed. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify published articles reporting interventions; 28 studies were found to be relevant. The main interventions found were computerised physician order entry (CPOE) and computer-aided prescribing. Most CPOE and computer-aided prescribing studies showed some degree of reduction in medication errors, with some claiming no errors occurring after implementation of the intervention. However, one study showed a significant increase in mortality after the implementation of CPOE. Further research is needed to investigate outcomes such as mortality and economics. Unit dose dispensing systems and educational/risk management programmes were also shown to reduce medication errors in children. Although it is suggested that 'smart' intravenous pumps can potentially reduce infusion errors in children, there is insufficient information to draw a conclusion because of a lack of research. Most interventions identified were US based, and since medicine management processes are currently different in different countries, there is a need to interpret the information carefully when considering implementing interventions elsewhere.