MAVS activates TBK1 and IKKε through TRAFs in NEMO dependent and independent manner

Role of TRAFs in Signaling Pathways Controlling T Follicular Helper Cell Differentiation and T Cell-Dependent Antibody Responses

Follicular helper T (T_FH) cells represent a highly specialized CD4⁺ T cell subpopulation that supports the generation of germinal centers (GC) and provides B cells with critical signals promoting antibody class switching, generation of high affinity antibodies, and memory formation. T_FH cells are characterized by the expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR5, the transcription factor Bcl-6, costimulatory molecules ICOS, and PD-1, and the production of cytokine IL-21. The acquisition of a T_FH phenotype is a complex and multistep process that involves signals received through engagement of the TCR along with a multitude of costimulatory molecules and cytokines receptors. Members of the Tumor necrosis factor Receptor Associated Factors (TRAF) represent one of the major classes of signaling mediators involved in the differentiation and functions of T_FH cells. TRAF molecules are the canonical adaptor molecules that physically interact with members of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily (TNFRSF) and actively modulate their downstream signaling cascades through their adaptor function and/or E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. OX-40, GITR, and 4-1BB are the TRAF-dependent TNFRSF members that have been implicated in the differentiation and functions of T_FH cells. On the other hand, emerging data demonstrate that TRAF proteins also participate in signaling from the TCR and CD28, which deliver critical signals leading to the differentiation of T_FH cells. More intriguingly, we recently showed that the cytoplasmic tail of ICOS contains a conserved TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1)-binding motif that is shared with TBK1-binding TRAF proteins. The presence of this TRAF-mimicking signaling module downstream of ICOS is required to mediate the maturation step during T_FH differentiation. In addition, JAK-STAT pathways emanating from IL-2, IL-6, IL-21, and IL-27 cytokine receptors affect T_FH development, and crosstalk between TRAF-mediated pathways and the JAK-STAT pathways can contribute to generate integrated signals required to drive and sustain T_FH differentiation. In this review, we will introduce the molecular interactions and the major signaling pathways controlling the differentiation of T_FH cells. In each case, we will highlight the contributions of TRAF proteins to these signaling pathways. Finally, we will discuss the role of individual TRAF proteins in the regulation of T cell-dependent humoral responses.

Low level expression of the Mitochondrial Antiviral Signaling protein (MAVS) associated with long-term nonprogression in SIV-infected rhesus macaques

BACKGROUND

Abnormally increased immune activation is one of the main pathological features of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This study aimed to determine whether long-term nonprogression (LTNP) suppresses the upregulation of immune activation and to elucidate the mechanisms whereby the LTNP state is maintained.

METHODS

For this study we selected 4 rhesus macaques(RMs) infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) that were long-term nonprogressors (LTNP); for comparison we chose 4 healthy RMs that were seronegative for SIV (hereafter referred to as the Control group), and 4 progressing infection (Progressive group) SIV RMs. We observed these animals for 6 months without intervention and explored the immunological and pathological differences among the 3 groups. A series of immune activation and inflammation markers-such as C- C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), beta 2- microglobulin (β2-MG), Human Leukocyte Antigen - antigen D Related (HLA-DR), CD38, the levels of microbial translocation (LPS -binding protein), and MAVS-and histological features were monitored during this period.

RESULTS

Both SIV RNA and SIV DNA in the plasma and lymph nodes (LNs) of the LTNP group were at significantly lower levels than those of the Progressive group (P < 0.05). The CD4/CD8 ratio and CD4 cell count and proportion in the LTNP group were between those of the Progressive and Control groups (P < 0.05): that is, they were higher than in the Progressive group and lower than in the Control group. The LTNP macaques manifested slow progression and decreased immune activation and inflammation; they also had lower levels of CCR5, LPS-binding protein, and β2-MG than the Progressive RMs (P < 0.05). Activation of LTNP in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was significantly lower than in the Progressive group and closer to that in the Control group. The histological features of the LTNP macaques were also closer to those of the Control group, even though they had been infected with SIV 4 years earlier. These data point to low viral replication in the LTNP macaques but it is not static. The expression of MAVS in peripheral blood and LNs was lower in the LTNP group than that in the Progressive group (P < 0.01), and MAVS was positively correlated with SIV DNA in LNs (P < 0.05). This may reflect the low activation of T lymphocytes. It was speculated that MAVS may be the link between innate and acquired antiviral immunity in SIV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The LTNP RMs in our study were in a relatively stable state of low activation and inflammation, some biological progression with no disease events. This may have been associated with their low levels of the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS).

Type I Interferon Induced and Antagonized by Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus

Viral infections trigger the innate immune system, serving as the first line of defense, and are characterized by the production of type I interferon (IFN). Type I IFN is expressed in a broad spectrum of cells and tissues in the host and includes various subtypes (IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-δ, IFN-ε, IFN-κ, IFN-τ, IFN-ω, IFN-ν, and IFN-ζ). Since the discovery of type I IFN, our knowledge of the biology of type I IFN has accumulated immensely, and we now have a substantial amount of information on the molecular mechanisms of the response and induction of type I IFN, as well as the strategies utilized by viruses to evade the type I IFN response. Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) can selectively alter cellular pathways to promote viral replication and evade antiviral immune activation of type I IFN. RNA molecules generated by FMDV are sensed by the cellular receptor for pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). FMDV preferentially activates different sensor molecules and various signal transduction pathways. Based on knowledge of the virus or RNA pathogen specificity as well as the function-structure relationship of RNA sensing, it is necessary to summarize numerous signaling adaptors that are reported to participate in the regulation of IFN gene activation.

The Many Roles of Ubiquitin in NF-κB Signaling

The nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway ubiquitously controls cell growth and survival in basic conditions as well as rapid resetting of cellular functions following environment changes or pathogenic insults. Moreover, its deregulation is frequently observed during cell transformation, chronic inflammation or autoimmunity. Understanding how it is properly regulated therefore is a prerequisite to managing these adverse situations. Over the last years evidence has accumulated showing that ubiquitination is a key process in NF-κB activation and its resolution. Here, we examine the various functions of ubiquitin in NF-κB signaling and more specifically, how it controls signal transduction at the molecular level and impacts in vivo on NF-κB regulated cellular processes.