Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization

Milestones in the evolution of hepatic surgery

This paper describes the rapid evolution of modern liver surgery, starting in the middle of the twentieth century. Claude Couinaud studied and described the segmental anatomy of the liver, Thomas Starzl performed the first liver transplantations, and Henri Bismuth introduced the concept of anatomical resections. Hepatic surgery has developed significantly since those early days. To date, innovative techniques are applied, using cutting-edge technologies: Intraoperative ultrasound, techniques of vascular exclusion of the liver, new devices for performing homeostasis and dissection, laparoscopy for resections, and new drugs that allow the resection of previously unresectable tumors. The next stage in liver surgery will probably be the implementation of a multidisciplinary holistic approach to the liver-diseased patient that will ensure the best and most efficient treatments in the future.

Extending limits of resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: risk benefit ratio

Improvements in treatment strategies and a better knowledge of tumor biology have contributed to an increase in the number of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) who are candidate for surgery. These progresses are on going and the introduction of effective systemic therapy agents contributes further to the increase in the resectability of patients with advanced CLM.

Impact of portal vein embolization on expression of cancer stem cell markers in regenerated liver and colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the expression of stem cell markers in normal liver and colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this paper is to assess whether patterns of stem cell marker expression differ between normal liver tissue and CLM and to determine whether a clinical model of liver regeneration induced by portal vein embolization (PVE) has any influence on these patterns of expression in both regenerated liver tissue and cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was used to provide semi-quantitative analysis of patterns of expression in tissue samples of liver and tumor tissue pre- and post-PVE in 23 patients with CLM. CD133, CD44 and Oct4 were studied.

RESULTS

There was no expression of CD133, CD44 or Oct4 in normal liver tissue before PVE but there was high expression of CD133 and CD44 in CLM. PVE had no significant influence on stem cell marker expression either in regenerated liver tissue or in tumor when compared with pre-PVE samples.

CONCLUSION

Liver regeneration following PVE does not seem to involve stem cells. Stem cell marker expression by CLM supports the stem cell theory of carcinogenesis which is not influenced by PVE.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), formerly named venoocclusive disease, is a well-known complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and ingestion of food or drinks contaminated by pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Many other drugs and toxins have been associated with SOS, including several chemotherapeutic agents and immunosuppressors. SOS contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in all these settings. This review describes the histologic lesions of SOS, details its pathogenesis as it is understood today, specifies the recent data on its causes and how it may influence clinical management of colorectal liver metastases, and discusses the current knowledge on diagnosis and preventive options.

Portal vein embolization: rationale, outcomes, controversies and future directions

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is now considered the standard of care to improve safety for patients undergoing extensive hepatectomy with an anticipated small future liver remnant (FLR). PVE is used to induce contralateral liver hypertrophy in preparation for major liver resection. Optimal patient selection is essential to maximize the clinical benefits of PVE. Computed tomography volumetry is used to calculate a standardized FLR and determine the need for preoperative PVE. Percutaneous PVE can be performed via the transhepatic ipsilateral or contralateral approaches, depending on operator preference. Several different embolic agents are available to the interventional radiologist, all with similar effectiveness in inducing hypertrophy. When an extended hepatectomy is planned, right PVE should include segment 4, in order to maximize FLR hypertrophy. Multiple studies have demonstrated the beneficial outcomes of PVE in both patients with healthy livers and with underlying liver diseases. Novel improvements to PVE should expand its scope to patients who were previously not candidates for the procedure.

Role of surgery in colorectal liver metastases: Too early or too late?

As colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases become a serious public health problem, new treatment modalities are needed in order to achieve better results. In the last decade there has been very important progress in oncology, with new and more effective chemotherapeutic agents administered alone or in combination improving the resectability rate in up to 40% of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Advances in interventional radiology, in particular, with the use of portal vein embolization and radiofrequency thermal ablation are new strategies allowing major liver resections and treatment of small liver metastases or early recurrences. Surgery, however, remains the gold standard strategy with intention to treat. In this review article we will describe the advanced role of surgery in the multidisciplinary approach to colorectal liver metastases, and the clinical problems the liver surgeon has to deal with, such as the resectability of the metastases, the presence of bilobar liver lesions and extrahepatic disease, the impact of chemotherapy in already resectable liver metastases, the problem of vanishing metastases after chemotherapy and the dilemma of staged or combined liver and colon operations and which organ first in the clinical scenario of synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Uses and limitations of portal vein embolization for improving perioperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic resection remains the only curative option for the majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who do not meet criteria for transplantation or local ablative options. As the majority of patients with HCC also have underlying chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, post-hepatectomy complications can be significant, and in some prohibitive. The technique of portal vein embolization (PVE) has evolved to increase the candidacy of patients for major hepatectomy, as well as improve postoperative outcomes and safety. This review will focus on PVE and discuss our institution's experience with uses and limitations of this technique for HCC.

Pretreatment assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: expert consensus statement

Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is complex and relies on multiple factors including tumor extent and hepatic function. No single staging system is applicable to all patients with HCC. The staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer / International Union for Cancer Control should be used to predict outcome following resection or liver transplantation. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer scheme is appropriate in patients with advanced HCC not candidate for surgery. Dual phase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can be used for pretreatment assessment of tumor extent but the accuracy of these methods remains poor to characterize < 1 cm lesions. Assessment of tumor response should not rely only on tumor size and new imaging methods are available to evaluate response to therapy in HCC patients. Liver volumetry is part of the preoperative assessment of patients with HCC candidate for resection as it reflects liver function. Preoperative portal vein embolization is indicated in patients with small future liver remnant (≤ 20% in normal liver; ≤ 40% in fibrotic or cirrhotic liver). Tumor size is not a contraindication to liver resection. Liver resection can be proposed in selected patients with multifocal HCC. Besides tumor extent, surgical resection of HCC may be performed in selected patients with chronic liver disease.

The surgical treatment of hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma with hepatic metastases was long considered an incurable disease. Recent advances in surgical treatment have substantially improved the affected patients' prognosis. At first, surgery was only performed in patients whose hepatic tumor burden was small (<4 nodes, <5 cm). Currently, however, the main issue is the feasibility of curative resection of all metastases.

METHOD

The PubMed literature database was selectively searched for articles with the keywords "colorectal liver metastases," "chemotherapy," and "surgery." Particular attention was devoted to studies of large groups of patients, randomized trials, the German guidelines, and an analysis of the authors' own patient population.

RESULTS

Only 10% to 20% of all patients are candidates for surgical therapy (hepatic resection), as the rest are disqualified either by extensive liver involvement or by extrahepatic neoplasia. A further 10% of patients have hepatic metastases that are primarily considered inoperable, yet later become amenable to surgery after interdisciplinary treatment involving preoperative chemotherapy, portal-vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy, and/or locally ablative procedures. Chemotherapy is probably beneficial after hepatic resection, although the benefit has not yet been definitively demonstrated by clinical trials. Therefore, chemotherapy should only be given perioperatively in selected cases, when recommended by an interdisciplinary treatment team.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal approach to the treatment of hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma has led to an increase in the number of resections and to an improved long-term survival rate (currently more than 40% at 5 years).

Cholangiocarcinoma: update and future perspectives

Cholangiocarcinoma is commonly considered a rare cancer. However, if we consider the hepato-biliary system a single entity, cancers of the gallbladder, intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic biliary tree altogether represent approximately 30% of the total with incidence rates close to that of hepatocellular carcinoma, which is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In addition, cholangiocarcinoma is characterized by a very poor prognosis and virtually no response to chemotherapeutics; radical surgery, the only effective treatment, is not frequently applicable because late diagnosis. Biomarkers for screening programs and for follow-up of categories at risk are under investigation, however, currently none of the proposed markers has reached clinical application. For all these considerations, cancers of the biliary tree system should merit much more scientific attention also because a progressive increase in incidence and mortality for these cancers has been reported worldwide. This manuscript deals with the most recent advances in the epidemiology, biology and clinical presentation of cholangiocarcinoma.

Surgical management of liver metastases from gastrointestinal endocrine tumors

Liver metastases from endocrine tumors can reduce 5-year survival from 90% to 40% and, in cases of functional gastrointestinal endocrine tumors, lead to a carcinoid syndrome. Complete resection of cancerous disease should be considered in all cases. Indeed, after hepatectomy, prolonged survival (41-86% at five years) can be achieved, with low rates of surgery-related mortality (0-6.7%). Extended liver resection is required in most cases. Percutaneous portal embolization increases the volumetric feasibility of resection, and sequential hepatectomy techniques enable a two-stage resection of both bilobar metastases and the primary tumor. For carcinoid syndrome that does not respond to medical therapy, incomplete resection of liver metastases, by reducing tumor volume, may be indicated to reduce symptoms and halt the progression of carcinoid heart disease. In cases of non-resectable liver metastases in selected patients, liver transplantation can lead to 5-year survival rates as high as 77%.

Predictive factors for hypertrophy of the future remnant liver after selective portal vein embolization

BACKGROUND

To analyze predictive factors of hypertrophy of the nonembolized future remnant liver (FRL) after transhepatic preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) of the liver to be resected.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Age, gender, indocyanin green clearance test, chemotherapy before PVE, type of chemotherapy, operators, extent of PVE, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) associated with PVE, time delay between PVE and surgery, and platelet count were retrospectively evaluated as predictive factors for hypertrophy of FRL in 107 patients with malignant disease in noncirrhotic liver. PVE targeted the right liver lobe [n = 70] or the right liver lobe and segment IV [n = 37] when FRL/total liver volume ratio was below 25% in healthy liver or 40% in altered liver.

RESULTS

After PVE, FRL volume significantly increased by 69%, from 344 +/- 156 cm(3) to 543 +/- 192 cm(3) (P < .0001). The degree of hypertrophy was negatively correlated with FRL volume (correlation coefficient = -0.55, P < .0001) and FRL/TFL ratio (correlation coefficient = -0.52, P < .0001) before PVE. Patients, who have undergone chemotherapy with platin agents prior to PVE, demonstrated lower hypertrophy (P = .048).

CONCLUSION

Hypertrophy after PVE is inversely correlated to initial FRL volume. Hypertrophy of the liver might be influenced by the systemic chemotherapeutic received before PVE.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and nodular regenerative hyperplasia are frequent oxaliplatin-associated liver lesions and partially prevented by bevacizumab in patients with hepatic colorectal metastasis

AIMS

Because of its efficacy, oxaliplatin (OX) is increasingly used as a chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Oxaliplatin-associated liver toxicity has been reported and can affect clinical practice, but studies on its prevalence and a full pathological description are lacking. The aims of this study were to fill this gap by providing, from a pathologist's perspective, a detailed assessment of the spectrum of hepatic lesions associated with OX, to suggest a scoring system to quantify them, and to investigate the protective effect of bevacizumab against OX-associated damage.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The spectrum of oxaliplatin-associated liver lesions was investigated in a multi-institutional series of surgically resected CRLM (n = 385). Among 274 patients treated by OX, 54% had moderate/severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). Peliosis, centrilobular perisinusoidal/venular fibrosis and nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) developed in 10.6%, 47% and 24.5%, respectively. The 111 patients treated by surgery alone had no lesions. Hepatic lesions were less severe in patients treated with OX/bevacizumab (n = 70) compared with the group treated by OX alone (n = 204), with an incidence of moderate/severe SOS (31.4% versus 62.2%), peliosis (4.3% versus 14.6%), NRH (11.4% versus 28.9%, respectively) and centrilobular/venular fibrosis (31.4% versus 52%, respectively) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologists should be aware of the distinctive lesions associated with OX and of their high prevalence. OX-related lesions are less frequent in patients treated with bevacizumab, suggesting that this drug has a preventive effect. Uniform criteria for diagnosis and grading of OX-associated lesions should help to include histological data in the optimal multidisciplinary management of CRLM.

Assessment of future remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy in patients undergoing major liver resection

BACKGROUND

(99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) was used as a quantitative method to evaluate liver function. The aim of this study was to compare future remnant liver function assessed by (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with future remnant liver volume in the prediction of liver failure after major liver resection.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) volumetry and (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy were performed prior to major resection in 55 high-risk patients, including 30 patients with parenchymal liver disease. Liver volume was expressed as percentage of total liver volume or as standardized future remnant liver volume. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify a cutoff value for future remnant liver function in predicting postoperative liver failure.

RESULTS

Postoperative liver failure occurred in nine patients. A liver function cutoff value of 2.69%/min/m(2) was calculated by ROC curve analysis. (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy demonstrated better sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value compared to future remnant liver volume. Using 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy, one cutoff value suffices in both compromised and noncompromised patients.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative (99m)Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy is a valuable technique to estimate the risk of postoperative liver failure. Especially in patients with uncertain quality of the liver parenchyma, (99m)Tc-mebrofenin HBS proved of more value than CT volumetry.

Two-surgeon technique of parenchymal transection contributes to reduced transfusion rate in patients undergoing major hepatectomy: analysis of 1,557 consecutive liver resections

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusions are an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after hepatectomy. In-hospital transfusions are still reported in one third of patients in major series. Data on factors affecting blood transfusions in large series of liver resection are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors predictive of blood transfusion in hepatectomies performed at a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Records of 1,477 patients who underwent 1,557 liver resections between 1998 and 2007 were reviewed. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for red cell transfusion was performed.

RESULTS

Median intra-operative blood loss was 250 cc, and 30-day peri-operative red cell transfusion rate was 27%. On multivariate analysis, factors that significantly predicted increased red cell transfusion rates were female sex, pre-operative hematocrit<30%, platelet count<100,000/mm3, simultaneous resection of other organs, major hepatic resection, use of the Pringle maneuver, and tumors>10 cm. Parenchymal transection technique was an independent risk factor for perioperative red cell transfusion; the usage of the 2-surgeon technique (combined saline-linked cautery and ultrasonic dissection) was associated with a lower transfusion rate than other techniques, including ultrasonic dissection alone, finger fracture, and stapling (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Although most factors that affect the red cell transfusion rate for liver resection are patient- or tumor-related, the parenchymal transection technique is under the surgeon's control. The decrease in transfusion rate associated with the use of the 2-surgeon technique emphasizes the important role of the hepatobiliary surgeon in determining outcomes after liver resection.

Update and review of the multidisciplinary management of stage IV colorectal cancer with liver metastases

Background

The management of stage IV colorectal cancer with liver metastases has historically involved a multidisciplinary approach. In the last several decades, there have been great strides made in the therapeutic options available to treat these patients with advancements in medical, surgical, locoregional and adjunctive therapies available to patients with colorectal liver metastases(CLM). As a result, there have been improvements in patient care and survival. Naturally, the management of CLM has become increasingly complex in coordinating the various aspects of care in order to optimize patient outcomes.

Review

A review of historical and up to date literature was undertaken utilizing Medline/PubMed to examine relevant topics of interest in patients with CLM including criterion for resectability, technical/surgical considerations, chemotherapy, adjunctive and locoregional therapies. This review explores the various disciplines and modalities to provide current perspectives on the various options of care for patients with CLM.

Conclusion

Improvements in modern day chemotherapy as allowed clinicians to pursue a more aggressive surgical approach in the management of stage IV colorectal cancer with CLM. Additionally, locoregional and adjunctive therapies has expanded the armamentarium of treatment options available. As a result, the management of patients with CLM requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach utilizing various modalities and a more aggressive approach may now be pursued in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with CLM to achieve optimal outcomes.

Curable metastatic colorectal cancer: recommended paradigms

"Cure" for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer remains elusive, but for a growing subset of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), cure (ie, > 10-year survival without evidence of disease) is achieved in at least 17% of resected patients. Candidates for resection include those with limited and in some cases extensive hepatic disease, and in highly selected cases, patients with extrahepatic disease. Number, size, and bilaterality of CLMs no longer stand as absolute contraindications to surgery. Chemotherapy has further advanced the field of surgery for CLMs, enabling an additional group of patients who present with unresectable disease to undergo surgery after downsizing with chemotherapy. Modern surgical techniques and liver preparation allow resection after chemotherapy, with excellent results. This article summarizes the current multidisciplinary approach to treatment of CLMs. The definition of resectability, conversion of unresectable CLMs to resectable ones, advances in surgical techniques, advances in chemotherapy, and predictors of outcome are detailed.

Liver regeneration at day 7 after right hepatectomy: global and segmental volumetric analysis by using CT

PURPOSE

To evaluate total and segmental liver regeneration by comparing preoperative computed tomographic (CT) volumetry and CT volumetry on postoperative day 7 following right hepatectomy and to study liver regeneration estimated by using CT volumetry in patients with different surgical indications and in whom the middle hepatic vein (MHV) was harvested or not harvested.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Local medical ethics committee and state medical board approval and informed consent were obtained. Twenty-seven patients who had undergone right hepatectomy were imaged with multidetector CT preoperatively and at day 7 postoperatively. Fourteen patients (group 1) were living liver donors, including eight in whom the MHV was harvested. Thirteen patients (group 2) underwent right hepatectomy for other indications. Volumetric measurements were performed semiautomatically. Total volumes and segmental volumes were measured for total liver, future liver remnant (FLR), and liver remnant. Total and segmental early regeneration index, defined as [(V(LR) - V(FLR))/V(FLR)] x 100, where V(LR) is volume of the liver remnant and V(FLR) is volume of the FLR, were calculated. Comparisons were performed by using the Mann-Whitney test, and a P value of less than .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The liver remnant at day 7 showed a 64% increase in volume from the FLR, without a significant difference between groups 1 and 2. In the group with harvesting of MHV, volume and segmental regeneration index were significantly lower than in other patients, for both the caudate lobe (32 and 48 mL, respectively; P = .049) and liver segment IV (Couinaud) (206 and 334 mL, respectively; P = .008).

CONCLUSION

Segmental regeneration of the liver following right hepatectomy varies, depending on whether the MHV was harvested, and seems to be related to hepatic outflow.

Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009

Several advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) have occurred in the last decades. A multidisciplinary approach to this disease is therefore recommended. CC is a relatively rare tumor and the main risk factors are: chronic inflammation, genetic predisposition and congenital abnormalities of the biliary tree. While the incidence of intra-hepatic CC is increasing, the incidence of extra-hepatic CC is trending down. The only curative treatment for CC is surgical resection with negative margins. Liver transplantation has been proposed only for selected patients with hilar CC that cannot be resected who have no metastatic disease after a period of neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy. Magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, positron emission tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography scans are the most frequently used modalities for diagnosis and tumor staging. Adjuvant therapy, palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been relatively ineffective for inoperable CC. For most of these patients biliary stenting provides effective palliation. Photodynamic therapy is an emerging palliative treatment that seems to provide pain relief, improve biliary patency and increase survival. The clinical utility of other emerging therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial chemoinfusion and high intensity intraductal ultrasound needs further study.

Secondary hepatic resection as a therapeutic goal in advanced colorectal cancer

Surgery is the only curative option for patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer, but few patients present with resectable hepatic lesions. Chemotherapy is increasingly used to downstage initially unresectable disease and allow for potentially curative surgery. Standard chemotherapy regimens convert 10%-20% of cases to resectable disease in unselected populations and 30%-40% of those with disease confined to the liver. One strategy to further increase the number of candidates eligible for surgery is the addition of active targeted agents such as cetuximab and bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy. Data from a phase III trial indicate that cetuximab increases the number of patients eligible for secondary hepatic resection, as well as the rate of complete resection when combined with first-line treatment with the FOLFIRI regimen. The safety profiles of preoperative cetuximab or bevacizumab have not been thoroughly assessed, but preliminary evidence indicates that these agents do not increase surgical mortality or exacerbate chemotherapy-related hepatotoxicity, such as steatosis (5-fluorouracil), steatohepatitis (irinotecan), and sinusoidal obstruction (oxaliplatin). Secondary resection is a valid treatment goal for certain patients with initially unresectable liver metastases and an important end point for future clinical trials.

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: current management

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature with regard to outcome of surgical management for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor).

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Surgical resection provides the only possibility for cure. Advances in hepatobiliary imaging and surgical strategies to treat this disease have resulted in improved postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a review of the English literature on hilar cholangiocarcinoma from 1990 to 2007. This review included preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, issues and controversies in management, prognostic variables, and considerations for future directions.

RESULTS

Complete resection remains the most effective and only potentially curative therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Negative resection margins are associated with improved outcomes, and major hepatic resections have enhanced the likelihood of R0 resection. Portal vein embolization may be indicated in selected patients before extensive hepatic resection. Staging laparoscopy should be considered to detect occult metastatic disease. Orthotopic liver transplantation might be applicable for a highly selected subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection including major hepatic resection remains the mainstay of treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Additional evidence is needed to fully define the role of orthotopic liver transplantation. Improvements in adjuvant therapy are essential for improving long-term outcome.

Hepatic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumor liver metastases

Liver resection is the preferred treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor liver metastases (GIST LMs) when complete resection can be achieved. Major and extended hepatic resections can be safely performed, and using modern techniques, an increasing proportion of patients with GIST LMs are candidates for potentially curative therapy. The combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (eg, imatinib) with surgery seems to improve outcome, and although prospective data are lacking, a short neoadjuvant course (6 months) of imatinib therapy followed by resection may improve patient selection for surgery and outcome from treatment. Postoperative therapy with imatinib is generally advised, although the duration of such therapy is not yet clearly defined. These questions may formulate the basis for future prospective studies of imatinib with complete resection of GIST LMs.

Preoperative right portal vein embolisation: indications and results

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of right portal vein embolisation (PVE) in inducing contralateral liver hypertrophy before extended hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients, 14 with liver metastases (ten from colorectal cancer; four from carcinoid tumours) and 12 with biliary cancers (ten Klatskin tumours; one gallbladder tumour; one intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) with insufficient predicted future remnant liver (FRL) underwent right PVE to induce hypertrophy of the contralateral hemiliver prior to surgical resection. Total liver volume, tumour volume and FRL volume were calculated on a 3D workstation. The ratio of the FRL to the total functional liver volume was <30% in all patients.

RESULTS

The FRL volume increased by 5%-25% (15% on average) after right PVE in patients with liver metastases and by 9%-19% (14% on average) in patients with biliary cancers. In all patients, the ratio of FRL to functional liver volume was >or=30% after right PVE. No postoperative deaths due to severe liver failure occurred in the 20 patients who underwent extended hepatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Right PVE extends the indications for hepatectomy in patients with liver metastases and those with biliary cancers who have an insufficient potential hepatic functional reserve.

Major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with or without portal vein embolization: Perioperative outcome and survival

BACKGROUND

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to minimize perioperative risks of major hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its effects on tumor growth are ill defined. Perioperative outcome and survival after major hepatic resection for HCC, with and without PVE, were investigated.

METHODS

Patients that underwent major hepatic resection (> or =3 segments) for HCC between January 1998 and May 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative PVE was performed when the remnant liver volume was predicted to be insufficient.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients underwent major hepatic resection for HCC: 21 patients with PVE before resection (PVE group) and 33 patients without PVE (non-PVE group). PVE and non-PVE groups had similar rates of fibrosis or cirrhosis, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, preoperative transarterial chemoembolization, overall postoperative complications, and positive margin (P = nonsignificant for all rates). There were no perioperative deaths in the PVE group and 6 (18%) deaths in the non-PVE group (P = .038). Median follow-up was 21 months. Excluding perioperative deaths, overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94%, 82%, and 72%, respectively, in the PVE group and 93%, 63%, and 54%, respectively, in the non-PVE group (P = .35). Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) rates were not significantly different between the groups, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates of 84%, 56%, and 56%, respectively, in the PVE group and 66%, 49%, and 49%, respectively, in the non-PVE group (P = .38).

CONCLUSION

PVE before major hepatic resection for HCC is associated with improved perioperative outcome. Excluding perioperative mortality, overall survival and DFS rates were similar between patients with and without preoperative PVE.

Portal vein embolization in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

In patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, extended hepatectomy and caudate lobe resection are often performed to achieve an R0 resection. In patients whose standardized future liver remnant is less than or equal to 20% of total liver volume, portal vein embolization (PVE) should be performed. In patients with biliary dilatation of the future liver remnant, a biliary drainage catheter should be placed before PVE. If the planned surgery is an extended right hepatectomy, segment 4 branch embolization improves the hypertrophy of segments 2 and 3. In high-volume centers, PVE can be safely performed; it increases the resectability rate and results in the same survival rates as those in patients who undergo resection without PVE.

Current management of colorectal hepatic metastasis

In the USA, cancers of the colon and rectum are the third most common site of new cancer cases and cancer deaths. With improved screening and adjuvant therapy, the survival of patients has increased substantially over the last decade. However, patients with metastatic disease often have limited survival. Hepatic metastasis is one of the most frequent sites of metastatic disease. In fact, 35-55% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop hepatic metastasis at some time during the course of their disease. Patients who are able to undergo complete resection of their hepatic metastases have the best chance of long-term survival. The goal of hepatic resection is to achieve complete resection of all metastases with microscopically negative surgical margins while preserving sufficient hepatic parenchyma. Survival following hepatic resection of colorectal metastasis now approaches 35-50%. However, approximately 65% of patients will have a recurrence at 5 years. Increasingly chemotherapeutic agents are being offered in the preoperative setting prior to operation. At the time of operation, patients with extensive hepatic disease can sometimes be offered ablative therapies combined with resection or staged approaches. Modern management of hepatic colorectal metastases necessitates a multidisciplinary approach to effectively treat these patients and increase the number of patients who will benefit from resection.

Portal vein embolization using a nitinol plug (Amplatzer vascular plug) in combination with histoacryl glue and iodinized oil: adequate hypertrophy with a reduced risk of nontarget embolization

The purpose of this study was to assess whether portal vein embolization (PVE) using a nitinol vascular plug in combination with histoacryl glue and iodinized oil minimizes the risk of nontarget embolization while obtaining good levels of future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. Between November 2005 and August 2008, 16 patients (8 females, 8 males; mean age, 63 +/- 3.6 years), each with a small FLR, underwent right ipsilateral transhepatic PVE prior to major hepatectomy. Proximal PVE was initially performed by placement of a nitinol vascular plug, followed by distal embolization using a mixture of histoacryl glue and iodinized oil. Pre- and 6 weeks postprocedural FLR volumes were calculated using computed tomographic imaging. Selection for surgery required an FLR of 0.5% of the patient's body mass. Clinical course and outcome of surgical resection for all patients were recorded. At surgery, the ease of hepatectomy was subjectively assessed in comparison to previous experience following PVE with alternative embolic agents. PVE was successful in all patients. Mean procedure time was 30.4 +/- 2.5 min. Mean absolute increase in FLR volume was 68.9% +/- 12.0% (p = 0.00005). There was no evidence of nontarget embolization during the procedure or on subsequent imaging. Nine patients proceeded to extended hepatectomy. Six patients demonstrated disease progression. One patient did not achieve sufficient hypertrophy in relation to body mass to undergo hepatic resection. At surgery, the hepatobiliary surgeons observed less periportal inflammation compared to previous experience with alternative embolic agents, facilitating dissection at extended hepatectomy. In conclusion, ipsilateral transhepatic PVE using a single nitinol plug in combination with histoacryl glue and iodinized oil simplifies the procedure, offering short procedural times with minimal risk of nontarget embolization. Excellent levels of FLR hypertrophy are achieved enabling safe extended hepatectomy.

Volumetric and functional recovery of the remnant liver after major liver resection with prior portal vein embolization : recovery after PVE and liver resection

INTRODUCTION

Portal vein embolization is an accepted method to increase the future remnant liver preoperatively. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of preoperative portal vein embolization on liver volume and function 3 months after major liver resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study. Data were collected of patients who underwent portal vein embolization prior to (extended) right hemihepatectomy and of control patients who underwent the same type of resection without prior portal vein embolization. Liver volumes were measured by computed tomography volumetry before portal vein embolization, before liver resection, and 3 months after liver resection. Liver function was assessed by hepatobiliary scintigraphy before and 3 months after liver resection.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included in the embolization group and 13 in the control group. Groups were comparable for gender, age, and number of patients with a compromised liver. The mean future remnant liver volume was 33.0 +/- 8.0% prior to portal vein embolization in the embolization group and 45.6 +/- 9.1% in the control group (p < 0.01). Prior to surgery, there were no significant differences in future remnant liver volume and function between the groups. Three months postoperatively, the mean remnant liver volume was 81.9 +/- 8.9% of the initial total liver volume in the embolization group and 79.4 +/- 11.0% in the control group (p > 0.05). Remnant liver function increased up to 88.1 +/- 17.4% and 83.3 +/- 14% respectively of the original total liver function (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative portal vein embolization does not negatively influence postoperative liver regeneration assessed 3 months after major liver resection.

Patterns of chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury and their implications for patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used to enlarge the cohort of patients who can be offered hepatic resection for malignancy. However, the impact of these agents on the liver parenchyma itself, and their effects on clinical outcomes following hepatic resection remain unclear. This review identifies patterns of regimen-specific chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury and assesses their impact on outcomes following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

An electronic search was performed using the MEDLINE (US Library of Congress) database from 1966 to May 2007 to identify relevant articles related to chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury and subsequent outcome following hepatic resection.

RESULTS

The use of the combination of 5-flourouracil and leucovorin is linked to the development of hepatic steatosis, and translates into increased postoperative infection rates. A form of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) related to chemotherapy and otherwise known as chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis (CASH) is closely linked to irinotecan-based therapy and is associated with inferior outcomes following hepatic surgery mainly due to hepatic insufficiency and poor regeneration. Data on sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) following treatment with oxaliplatin are less convincing, but there appears to be an increased risk for intra-operative bleeding and decreased hepatic reserve associated with the presence of SOS. Intra-arterial floxuridine therapy damages the extrahepatic biliary tree in addition to causing parenchymal liver damage, and has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity after hepatic resection.

CONCLUSION

Agent-specific patterns of damage are now being recognized with increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. The potential benefits and risks of these should be considered on an individual patient basis prior to hepatic resection.

Induction of tumor growth after preoperative portal vein embolization: is it a real problem?

Although preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is an effective means to increase future remnant liver (FRL) volume, little has been published on possible adverse effects. This review discusses the clinical and experimental evidence regarding the effect of PVE on tumor growth in both embolized and nonembolized liver lobes, as well as potential strategies to control tumor progression after PVE. A literature review was performed using MEDLINE with keywords related to experimental and clinical studies concerning PVE, portal vein ligation (PVL), and tumor growth. Cross-references and references from reviews were also checked. Clinical and experimental data suggest that tumor progression can occur after preoperative PVE in embolized and nonembolized liver segments. Clinical evidence indicating possible tumor progression in patients with colorectal metastases or with primary liver tumors is based on studies with small sample size. Although multiple studies demonstrated tumor progression, evidence concerning a direct increase in tumor growth rate as a result of PVE is circumstantial. Three possible mechanisms influencing tumor growth after PVE can be recognized, namely changes in cytokines or growth factors, alteration in hepatic blood supply and an enhanced cellular host response promoting local tumor growth after PVE. Post-PVE chemotherapy and sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) before PVE have been proposed to reduce tumor mass after PVE. We conclude that tumor progression can occur after PVE in patients with colorectal metastases as well as in patients with primary liver tumors. However, further research is needed in order to rate this risk of tumor progression after PVE.

Mesohepatectomy as an option for the treatment of central liver tumors

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial improvements in intra- and postoperative management of extended hemihepatectomy as the curative option for treatment of central liver tumors, the high morbidity and mortality rates accompanying the procedure still represent major obstacles. Mesohepatectomy preserves up to 35% more functional liver tissue than extended hepatectomy, but it has not been widely applied, perhaps because of its complexity as a resection method.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-eight consecutive patients (29 men and 19 women) with centrally located liver tumors underwent mesohepatectomy. Peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were prospectively evaluated and analyzed. Mean age of the patients was 60.7 years. Indications for mesohepatectomy were liver metastasis (n = 29), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5), gallbladder carcinoma (n = 4), cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 4), hemangioma (n = 2), and other benign diseases (n = 4).

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 238 minutes (range 65 to 480 minutes) and mean intraoperative blood loss was 1,120 mL (range 100 to 5,000 mL). Mean amount of intraoperative red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma transfusion was 3.6 U (range 1 to 12 U) and 3.8 U (range 2 to 14 U), respectively. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 15.8 days (range 6 to 104 days). Postoperative surgical complications were seen in 18.8% of patients (n = 9) and included liver failure (n = 1), intraabdominal abscess (n = 1), bilioma or bile leakage (n = 4), hemorrhage and hematoma (n = 2), peritonitis because of intestinal perforation (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 1). One patient (2%) died in the early postoperative phase from portal vein bleeding and disseminated intravascular coagulation, followed by liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with extended liver resection, mesohepatectomy clearly leads to less parenchymal loss. Although it is a technically difficult operation and requires special attention to prevent surgical complications, it is justified in selected patients with centrally located tumors and is a feasible and safe alternative to extended liver resection.

Management of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancers: an update

Approximately 50%-60% of patients with colorectal cancers will develop liver lesions in their life span. Despite the potential of surgical resection to provide long-term survival in this subset of patients, only 15%-20% are found to be resectable. The introduction of new neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic agents and the expanding criteria of resection have enhanced the overall 5-year survival from 30% to 60% in the past decade. The use of technical innovations such as staged resection; portal vein embolization, and repeat resection have allowed higher resection rates in patients with bilobar disease. Extrahepatic primary and liver-exclusive recurrent disease no longer represent an absolute contraindication to resection. The role of regional therapy using hepatic arterial infusion is being redefined for liver-exclusive unresectable disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with regional therapies is being looked at from fresh perspectives. Ablative approaches have gained a firm role both as an adjunct to surgical resection and in the management of patients who are not surgical candidates. Overall, the management of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancers requires a multimodal approach.

Preoperative chemotherapy does not increase morbidity or mortality of hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases

Hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer (mCRC) is best treated with a multidisciplinary approach. Conflicting data exist regarding the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy. We hypothesized that preoperative chemotherapy does not adversely impact complications or mortality associated with hepatectomy. A retrospective analysis was performed and included patients with mCRC who underwent hepatectomy from 1996 to 2006. Patients were separated into two groups: those who received preoperative chemotherapy and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with morbidity and mortality. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to determine disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred eighty-six patients were analyzed: 112 (60%) received preoperative chemotherapy for a median of 4.2 months. Eighty patients (43%) underwent major hepatectomy. When comparing the two groups, there were no differences in hepatic tumor size (median 3 cm; p = 0.35), type of resection (p = 0.62), stage (p = 0.44) or location (p = 0.10) of the primary tumor, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p = 0.80), or number of nodes in lymphadenectomy (p = 0.62). Only number of positive nodes after colectomy (p = 0.02), age (p < or = 0.0001), and combined resection/radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (p = 0.004) were statistically different between the two groups. There was no difference in rates of morbidity (p = 0.81), mortality (p = 0.29), DFS (p = 0.25) or OS (p = 0.30). We conclude that the use of preoperative chemotherapy did not increase the risk of complications or death for patients undergoing hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy appears to be safe and is an important part of the multidisciplinary approach for this disease.

Portal venous gas following chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis

The standard of care for patients with colorectal liver metastases is a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. New chemotherapy regimens with biologic agents (cetuximab, bevacizumab) have been shown to increase tumor response rates. Although this might be beneficial and this is an expected endpoint, it should be noted that patients with synchronous colorectal and liver metastases are at risk of septic complications. We recently encountered a case of hepatic portal venous gas after two cycles of chemotherapy in a patient with right colon cancer liver metastases. Complete necrosis of the liver metastasis subsequently turned into a liver abscess, which fistulized in the right portal vein. Infection of the necrotized metastasis was thought to be promoted by the colic tumor. Although this is a dramatic situation, it does not contraindicate a curative surgical resection.

Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the United States, primarily due to hepatitis C-related liver disease. Nearly 85%-90% of patients with HCC have underlying chronic liver disease or cirrhosis. Advanced tumor burden or prohibitive hepatic dysfunction precludes operative resection in most patients with HCC. Surgical resection is a treatment option with curative intent in patients with HCC not associated with cirrhosis or in patients with well-compensated liver disease. Tumor extent and hepatic function must be assessed preoperatively to avoid postresection hepatic failure, an often fatal condition that may require urgent liver transplantation. Appropriately selected candidates for liver resection have 5-year postoperative survival rates of 40%-70%, but recurrence rates approach 70%, especially in patients with cirrhosis. For this reason, the best resection for patients with HCC and cirrhosis is orthotopic liver transplantation, which has 5-year posttransplant survival rates of 65%-80% in well-selected candidates.

Potentially curable metastatic colorectal cancer

Although patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have historically had a uniformly dismal prognosis, recent advances in chemotherapeutics and surgical techniques allow many patients to be treated with the potential for long-term survival and cure. Patients with potentially curable disease are those in whom multidisciplinary strategies including surgery can result in safe resection of all metastatic disease with negative margins. Although favorable outcomes using such strategies can increasingly be predicted, the presence of poor prognostic factors does not necessarily represent a contraindication to the use of a potentially curative strategy as long as a margin-negative resection can ultimately be obtained. Further analysis of the innovative strategies and techniques described in this article are needed to maximize cure rates in patients with this disease.

Staging of advanced colorectal cancer

The management of advanced colorectal cancer has changed dramatically during the last decade. By redefining resectability, and with the use of modern chemotherapy, nearly 10% of unresectable patients are now alive 5 years after diagnosis, and, overall, 20% are alive at 5 years when the combined results of surgery and chemotherapy are considered. These achievements are not reflected in the current staging, which categorizes all disease spread beyond the lymph node basin of the primary tumor as unstratified stage 4. This article discusses the merits of a number of proposals for a new, meaningful staging system for advanced colorectal cancer.

Is embolization of segment 4 portal veins before extended right hepatectomy justified?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is increasingly used as a preparation for major hepatectomy in patients with inadequate liver remnant volume or function. However, whether segment 4 (S4) portal veins should be embolized is controversial. The effect of S4 PVE on the volume gain of segments 2 and 3 (S2+3) was examined.

METHODS

Among 73 patients with uninjured liver who underwent right portal vein embolization (RPVE, n = 15) or RPVE extended to S4 portal veins (RPVE+4, n = 58), volume changes in S2+3 and S4 after embolization were compared. Clinical outcomes and PVE complications were assessed.

RESULTS

After a median of 27 days, the S2+3 volume increased significantly after both RPVE and RPVE+4, but the absolute increase was significantly higher for RPVE+4 (median, 106 mL vs 141 mL; P = .044), as was the hypertrophy rate (median, 26% vs 54%; P = .021). There was no significant difference between RPVE and RPVE+4 in the absolute S4 volume increase (52 mL for RPVE vs 55 mL for RPVE+4; P = .61) or the hypertrophy rate of S4 (30% for RPVE vs 26% for RPVE+4; P = .45). Complications of PVE occurred in 1 patient (7%) after RPVE and 6 (10%) after RPVE+4 (P > .99). No PVE complication precluded subsequent resection. Curative hepatectomy was performed in 13 patients (87%) after RPVE and 40 (69%) after RPVE+4 (P = .21).

CONCLUSIONS

RPVE+4 significantly improves S2+3 hypertrophy compared with RPVE alone. Extending RPVE to S4 does not increase PVE-associated complications.

Feasibility of laparoscopic portal vein ligation prior to major hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Patients noted to have an inadequate future liver remnant on pre operative volumetric assessment are considered to be candidates for portal vein embolization (PVE). A subset of patients undergo laparoscopic intervention prior to PVE for staging purposes or to address the primary in Stage IV colon cancer. These patients usually undergo PVE as a subsequent additional procedure by the transhepatic route. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of portal vein ligation by the laparoscopic approach in suitable patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients that underwent laparoscopic portal vein ligation (LPVL). The demographic, clinical, radiographic, operative and volumetric details were collected to determine the feasibility of portal vein ligation.

RESULTS

A total of nine patients underwent LPVL as part of a two stage procedure in preparation for subsequent major hepatectomy. With a median age of 67 yrs, the diagnoses included: colorectal metastasis (five patients), cholangiocarcinoma (three patients) and hepatocellular carcinoma (one patient). The ligation involved the right portal vein in all and was performed with silk ligature (seven patients) and clips (two patients). Volumetric data was available in six patients which showed a mean increase from 209.1 cc+/-97.76 to 495.83 cc+/-310.91 (increase by 181.5%) In two patients, inadequate hypertrophy mandated later embolization by percutaneous technique. Five patients underwent subsequent major hepatic resection as planned. The remaining four patients were noted to have progression of disease that precluded the planned procedure. There were no complications associated with LPVL.

CONCLUSIONS

LPVL is feasible and can be safely performed. In a select group of patients, it may be considered as an alternative to subsequent embolization and thereby potentially absolve the need for an additional procedure with its attendant complications.