Sirolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with increased survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Present state of immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients

1. Our increasing understanding of the signaling pathways and cellular interactions in transplant immunobiology has facilitated targeted strategies using novel immunosuppressive agents. 2. The pattern of immunosuppressive drug use in the United States continues to change, and the changes include the use of antibody induction therapy and the agents used in maintenance therapy. 3. The driving forces behind the development of new immunosuppressive regimens are the long-term complications of current immunosuppressive regimens (particularly renal dysfunction and metabolic disturbances).

Hepatocellular carcinoma: agents and concepts for preventing recurrence after curative treatment

1. Adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 2. Neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization. 3. Kinase inhibitors (eg, sorafenib). 4. Antiviral treatment. 5.Immunosuppressive treatment after liver transplantation. 6. Disseminated tumor cells: the basis for innovative treatment options?

Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report

Although liver transplantation is a widely accepted treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), much controversy remains and there is no generally accepted set of guidelines. An international consensus conference was held on Dec 2-4, 2010, in Zurich, Switzerland, with the aim of reviewing current practice regarding liver transplantation in patients with HCC and to develop internationally accepted statements and guidelines. The format of the conference was based on the Danish model. 19 working groups of experts prepared evidence-based reviews according to the Oxford classification, and drafted recommendations answering 19 specific questions. An independent jury of nine members was appointed to review these submissions and make final recommendations, after debates with the experts and audience at the conference. This report presents the final 37 statements and recommendations, covering assessment of candidates for liver transplantation, criteria for listing in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients, role of tumour downstaging, management of patients on the waiting list, role of living donation, and post-transplant management.

Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report

Although liver transplantation is a widely accepted treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), much controversy remains and there is no generally accepted set of guidelines. An international consensus conference was held on Dec 2-4, 2010, in Zurich, Switzerland, with the aim of reviewing current practice regarding liver transplantation in patients with HCC and to develop internationally accepted statements and guidelines. The format of the conference was based on the Danish model. 19 working groups of experts prepared evidence-based reviews according to the Oxford classification, and drafted recommendations answering 19 specific questions. An independent jury of nine members was appointed to review these submissions and make final recommendations, after debates with the experts and audience at the conference. This report presents the final 37 statements and recommendations, covering assessment of candidates for liver transplantation, criteria for listing in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients, role of tumour downstaging, management of patients on the waiting list, role of living donation, and post-transplant management.

The metabolic and toxicological considerations for mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem worldwide. Several molecular pathways involved in HCC growth and progression have recently been identified. Rapamycin analogs are able to inhibit one of the most active oncogenic molecular pathways in HCC cells: the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors analyze the principal molecular features of the mTOR pathway and the use of rapamycin analogs in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma. The article also looks at the reoccurrence of HCC following liver transplantation as well as after the treatment of de novo neoplasms. Finally, the authors discuss the advantage of using a combined HCC pharmacological therapy to obtain a synergistic effect on tumor mass.

EXPERT OPINION

Among the available options for the treatment of advanced-stage HCC, mTOR pathway inhibitors show great promise. Once these agents have their safety and efficacy confirmed, in the treatment of liver disease, their use should be considered in patients affected by HCC. This should especially be the case for those who have had liver transplants or suffered with de novo tumors. Moreover, the authors believe that mTOR inhibitors could be used in a combined pharmacological approach to improve HCC molecular-targeted therapy by producing a multiple-level block of tumor intracellular signaling.

Genetic variations in plasma circulating DNA of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients predict recurrence after liver transplantation

Background

Recurrence prediction of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) present a great challenge because of a lack of biomarkers. Genetic variations play an important role in tumor development and metastasis.

Methods

Oligonucleotide microarrays were used to evaluate the genetic characteristics of tumor DNA in 30 HBV-related HCC patients who were underwent LT. Recurrence-related single-nucleotide polymorphism were selected, and their prognostic value was assessed and validated in two independent cohorts of HCC patients (N = 102 and N = 77), using pretransplant plasma circulating DNA. Prognostic significance was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate prognosis-related factors.

Results

rs894151 and rs12438080 were significantly associated with recurrence (P = .003 and P = .004, respectively). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the co-index of the 2 SNPs was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence (P = .040). Similar results were obtained in the third cohort (N = 77). Furthermore, for HCC patients (all the 3 cohorts) exceeding Milan criteria, the co-index was a prognostic factor for recurrence and survival (P<.001 and P = .002, respectively).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated first that genetic variations of rs894151 and rs12438080 in pretransplant plasma circulating DNA are promising prognostic markers for tumor recurrence in HCC patients undergoing LT and identify a subgroup of patients who, despite having HCC exceeding Milan criteria, have a low risk of post-transplant recurrence.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: five steps to prevent recurrence

Liver transplantation is the best treatment of patients with unresectable early hepatocellular carcinoma, allowing disease-free survival rates of 60-80% at 5 years. Despite these good results, some 10% of recipients experience a posttransplant HCC recurrence, which leads to death in almost all patients. Recurrence is either due to the growth of occult metastases or to the engraftment of circulating tumor cells. It can be hypothesized that strategies to decrease the engraftment of circulating tumor cells could decrease the risk of recurrence and, in addition, extend access to transplantation to patients with more advanced HCC. These potential strategies can be schematized into five steps, including (1) selecting recipients with low baseline levels of circulating HCC cells, by adding biological markers (such as alpha fetoprotein or molecular signatures) to the accepted combination of morphological criteria; (2) decreasing the perioperative release of HCC cells, with careful perioperative handling of the tumors; (3) preventing the engraftment of circulating HCC cells by decreasing liver graft ischemia-reperfusion injury, which has been shown to promote cancer cell engraftment and growth; (4) using anticancer drugs, including mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and (5) tuning immunity toward HCC clearance.

The impact of waiting list alpha-fetoprotein changes on the outcome of liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver transplantation is a recognized treatment for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but transplant criteria still need to be refined, especially in the case of more advanced or downstaged tumors.

METHODS

The present study investigated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a predictor of outcome in 6817 patients listed with a diagnosis of HCC in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

RESULTS

Local pre-transplant HCC treatment was used in 41% of patients on the waiting list. Patients with AFP levels>400 ng/ml at the time of listing who were downstaged to AFP ≤400 ng/ml had better intent-to-treat survival than patients failing to reduce AFP to ≤400 (81% vs. 48% at 3 years, p ≤0.001) and comparable survival to patients with stable AFP ≤400 ng/ml (74%, p = 0.14). Patients with AFP levels decreased ≤400 ng/ml and patients with levels persistently ≤400 ng/ml also had similar drop-out rates from the list (10% in both groups) and post-transplant survival rates (89% vs. 78% at 3 years, p = 0.11). Such an AFP downstaging was associated with good survivals whatever the level of the original AFP (even if originally>1000 ng/ml). Only the last pre-transplant AFP independently predicted survival (p ≤0.001), unlike AFP at listing or AFP changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, downstaging HCC patients with high AFP is feasible and leads to similar intent-to-treat and post-transplant survivals to those of patients with AFP persistently low. Only last AFP appears relevant for patient selection before transplantation and should be used in combination with morphological variables.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation: clinical perspective on molecular targeted strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has an aggressive clinical course with frequent recurrence and metastasis. Orthotopic liver transplantation has been the only curative tool for unresectable HCC; therefore, recent advances in molecular targeted therapy may improve the prognosis of HCC. The multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib and the macrolide antibiotic rapamycin are currently the most promising agents for treating unresectable HCC. A large population-based clinical trial revealed that sorafenib significantly prolonged the overall survival of HCC patients. However, subsequent clinical studies showed that sorafenib rarely reduced tumor volume and inadequately prolonged survival of patients with severe liver damage. To improve its therapeutic effect, the development of a predictive biomarker and a sorafenib-based combination is awaited. Another molecular targeting agent, rapamycin, has now been considered as a putative agent for preventing tumor recurrence in post-liver transplantation HCC patients, because it not only has immunosuppressive activity but also exerts an anti-tumor effect. In the near future, a combination of molecular targeting agents, such as sorafenib and rapamycin, may become a standard protocol for treating unresectable HCC. For specifying cases with more effective and less harmful modalities, further investigation in clinical and basic research to identify unexpected effects are needed.

Conversion to everolimus in maintenance liver transplant patients: a multicenter, retrospective analysis

Data on the conversion of patients to everolimus after liver transplantation are sparse. A multicenter, retrospective study followed 240 maintenance liver transplant patients to analyze the current indications for everolimus conversion, the employed regimens and exposure levels, and the impact on efficacy and safety. The mean time from transplantation to the introduction of everolimus was 4.9 ± 5.2 years. The mean everolimus trough level was 7.3 ± 4.1 ng/mL at month 1 and 8.1 ± 4.7 ng/mL at month 12. At 12 months, 61.6% of the patients were no longer receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula was 64.2 ± 30.0 mL/minute on day 0 and 68.4 ± 32.5 mL/minute at month 12 (P = 0.007). Among patients with baseline serum creatinine levels ≥ 130 μmol/L, the eGFR values were 44.3 ± 15.7 mL/minute on day 0 and 53.7 ± 26.0 mL/minute at month 12 (P = 0.003). Four patients (1.6%) developed mild or moderate biopsy-proven acute rejection. Adverse events led to everolimus discontinuation in 12.9% of the patients. After the initiation of everolimus, the mean white blood cell count decreased significantly, and the total cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased significantly. In this retrospective analysis of the largest cohort of maintenance liver transplant patients analyzed after their conversion to everolimus, more than 60% of the patients were kept free of CNIs with a very low risk of acute rejection and with an acceptable safety profile. Randomized trials in which maintenance liver transplant patients are switched to everolimus in response to clinical indications or preemptively are warranted.

Potent antifibrotic activity of mTOR inhibitors sirolimus and everolimus but not of cyclosporine A and tacrolimus in experimental liver fibrosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recurrence of chronic hepatitis C and progressive fibrosis in liver transplants is frequent and impairs both graft and patient survival. Whether or not the choice of immunosuppression affects progression of fibrosis remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare the potential of the commonly used immunosuppressants to halt experimental liver fibrosis progression.

METHODS

To induce liver fibrosis, rats underwent bile duct ligation and treatment with sirolimus (2mg/kg), everolimus (3mg/kg), tacrolimus (1mg/kg), and cyclosporin A (10mg/kg) daily for 5 weeks. Fibrosis, inflammation, and portal pressure were evaluated by histology, hydroxyproline levels, morphometry, hemodynamics, and hepatic gene expression.

RESULTS

Sirolimus and everolimus decreased fibrosis up to 70%, improved portal pressure, reduced ascites, and showed potent down-regulation of pro-fibrogenic genes, paralleled by a strong increase in matrix degradation (collagenase) activity; in contrast, tacrolimus and cyclosporine A had no or even aggravating effects on liver fibrosis in rats.

CONCLUSIONS

mTOR inhibition by sirolimus and everolimus in experimental liver fibrosis associates with significantly less fibrosis progression and portal hypertension than treatment with calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and cyclosporine A. These data suggest that the selection of the immunosuppressant could impact the recurrence of fibrosis in liver allografts.

Strategies of immunosuppression for liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver transplantation is considered to be the most efficient therapeutic option for patients with liver cirrhosis and early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in terms of overall survival and recurrence rate. The application of restrictive selection criteria based on tumor size and number of nodules is advised to obtain optimal results. Nevertheless, tumor recurrence occurs in 3.5% to 21% of recipients, despite careful pretransplant staging and patient selection. Post transplant recurrence of hepatocarcinoma clearly has a major negative impact on prognosis. Intuitively, an immunosupressed state is undesirable in cancer patients. Inversely, modulation or minimization of immunosuppressive therapy could influence tumor progression and reduce the negative impact of recurrence on posttransplant survival. Experimental evidence shows that mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects. Thus, their application has been proposed as antineoplastic agents for immunosuppressive protocols in liver transplant recipients with HCC and may reduce the rate or the impact of tumor recurrence. Clinical data about efficacy and safety of mTOR-based immunosuppressant protocols in liver transplant recipients with HCC show promising results, namely low recurrence and higher survival rates compared with standard calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive protocols, even among patients with extended morphological criteria. The safety profile is regarded generally as adequate.

Influence of immunosuppressive drugs on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a gap between basic science and clinical evidence

Effects of immunosuppressive drug on tumor development in transplantation are understudied. Tumors are especially concerning when liver transplantation recipients have a pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because immunosuppressive drugs likely influence HCC recurrence, with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors showing antineoplastic properties especially experimentally, we sought for practical medical guidance from published clinical studies. Although the current literature review revealed 14 studies regarding immunosuppression in this context, suggesting antitumor effects for mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, the quality of evidence is low. Therefore, randomized controlled trials investigating effects of immunosuppression on HCC recurrence in liver transplantation are lacking, exposing a gap between basic science knowledge and clinical evidence.

Predictive index for tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for locally advanced intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Current criteria for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remain restricted to early stage and small hilar tumors, excluding patients with locally advanced intrahepatic and hilar CCA for potential cure. The present study was undertaken to define a prognostic scoring system for risk stratification of patients with intrahepatic and hilar CCA who might benefit from OLT and to allow expansion of current OLT criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective review of 40 patients who underwent OLT for locally advanced intrahepatic and hilar CCA at our center between February 1985 and June 2010. Median follow-up was 3 years. Independent risk factors for tumor recurrence after OLT were identified using the Cox model and were assigned risk score points. Points were summed and assigned to predictive index categories: 0 to 3 for low risk, 4 to 7 for intermediate risk, and 8 to 15 for high risk.

RESULTS

Seven multivariate factors predictive for tumor recurrence included multifocal tumor, perineural invasion, infiltrative growth pattern, lack of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis, hilar tumors, and lymphovascular invasion. The 5-year tumor recurrence-free patient survival was significantly higher in low-risk (78%) compared with intermediate- (19%) and high-risk (0%) groups (p < 0.001); survival benefit was also seen in intermediate- compared with high-risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This model was highly predictive of long-term outcomes after OLT for locally advanced intrahepatic and hilar CCA and can be applied clinically for risk stratification of patients considered for OLT. Long-term disease recurrence-free survival was excellent in low-risk and acceptable in intermediate-risk groups, justifying the expansion of liver transplant criteria for treatment of this challenging malignancy.

Primary response against cytomegalovirus during antiviral prophylaxis with valganciclovir, in solid organ transplant recipients

Antiviral prophylaxis has proved successful for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients; though emerging data suggest that antiviral agents interfere with immunity, and may inhibit immune priming. In this context, we investigated levels and phenotype of primary CMV-specific immune responses that developed during antiviral prophylaxis in a cohort of CMV seronegative recipients (R(-) ) of a SOT from a seropositive donor (D(+) ). We longitudinally monitored CMV viral load, antibodies and levels of the negative immuno-modulator IL-10. PBMC were stimulated with CMV-specific peptide libraries to measure CD137 activation marker on CMV-specific T-cells and levels of PD-1 receptor, which is over expressed on exhausted T-cells. Unexpectedly, the majority (13/18) of D(+) R(-) patients who developed a primary CMV response showed early post-transplant CMV-specific responses, though levels of PD-1 on CMV-specific T-cells remained elevated throughout prophylaxis. A strong inverse association was found between levels of plasma IL-10 and CMV-specific cellular immune responses. Our study suggests that during prophylaxis, subclinical CMV infection might have occurred in the D(+) R(-) patients, and primary CMV-specific responses were detected early post-transplant when levels of plasma IL-10 were low. Extended prophylaxis or antiviral treatment did not appear to suppress CMV-specific antibodies or T-cells, which, however, showed exhaustion phenotypes.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an update

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a heterogeneous malignancy with multiple etiologies, high incidence, and high mortality. The standard surgical management for patients with HCC consists of locoregional ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation, depending on the background state of the liver. Eighty percent of patients initially presenting with HCC are unresectable, either due to the extent of tumor or the level of underlying hepatic dysfunction. While in patients with no evidence of cirrhosis and good hepatic function resection has been the surgical treatment of choice, it is contraindicated in patients with moderate to severe cirrhosis. Liver transplantation is the optimal surgical treatment.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed search of recent articles (from January 2000 to March 2011) was performed looking for relevant articles about hepatocellular carcinoma and its treatment. Additional articles were identified by evaluating references from selected articles.

RESULTS

Here we review criteria for transplantation, the types, indications, and role of locoregional therapy in treating the cancer and in downstaging for possible later transplantation. We also summarize the contribution of immunosuppression and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management and prevention of HCC recurrence. Finally we discuss recent advances in imaging, tumor biology, and genomics as we delineate the remaining challenges for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Much can be improved in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC. A great challenge will be to improve patient selection to criteria based on tumor biology. Another will be to incorporate systemic agents post-operatively in patients at high risk for recurrence, paying close attention to efficacy and safety. The future direction of the effort in treating HCC will be to stimulate prospective trials, develop molecular imaging of lymphovascular invasion, to improve recipient selection, and to investigate biomarkers of tumor biology.

Treatment options in hepatocellular carcinoma today

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer related death worldwide. As over 90% of HCCs arise in cirrhotic livers preventive methods and surveillance policies have been adopted in most countries with high prevalence of hepatitis B or C infected people. Poor prognosis of HCC has shown some improvement during the last years. Targeted therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), hepatic resection (HR), liver transplantation (LT), and transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) seems to have an influence on this development. The heterogeneity of cirrhotic patients with HCC is still a big challenge. A patient with a small tumour in a cirrhotic liver may have a worse prognosis than a patient with a large tumor in a relatively preserved liver after "curative" HR. The choice of the treatment modality depends on the size and the number of tumours, the stage and the cause of cirrhosis and finally on the availability of various modalities in each centre.

Evolving concepts in the selection of immunosuppression regimen for liver transplant recipients

The introduction of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) based immunosuppression has revolutionized the field of liver transplantation by dramatically reducing the incidence of acute cellular rejection and prolonging patient and allograft survival. However, the introduction of CNIs has also come at the price of increased patient morbidity, particularly with regard to the well-known nephrotoxic effects of the medications. In an effort to minimize the adverse effects, immunosuppression regimen have evolved to include the use of various induction agents and purine synthesis inhibitors to limit the dose of CNI necessary to achieve low acute cellular rejection rates. Careful assessments of risks and benefits are needed as these newer agents have their own side effect profiles. In addition, the impact of newer immunosuppression regimen on hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence has not been completely elucidated. This review will provide an overview of the most common immunosuppression regimen used in liver transplantation and discuss their impact on acute cellular rejection, patient and allograft survival, and HCV recurrence.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Although human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been a major global health problem for almost 3 decades, with the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy in 1996 and effective prophylaxis and management of opportunistic infections, mortality from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome has decreased markedly. In developed countries, this condition is now being treated as a chronic condition. As a result, rates of morbidity and mortality from other medical conditions leading to end-stage liver, kidney, and heart disease are steadily increasing in individuals with HIV. Because the definitive treatment for end-stage organ failure is transplantation, the demand for it has increased among HIV-infected patients. For these reasons, many transplant centers have eliminated HIV infection as a contraindication to transplantation, as a result of better patient management and demand.

A Decade of Experience Using mTor Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation

Some studies suggest that Sirolimus (SRL) is associated with an increased risk of death in liver transplant recipients compared to treatment with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). We compared patients who received SRL or CNI in the first year after liver transplant. Our database included 688 patients who received a liver transplant. The patients were divided into groups. (1) CNI + MPS (mycophenolate sodium) at time of discharge. (2) CNI + MPS at time of discharge; SRL was added within the first 6 months and continued through the first year. (3) CNI + MPS at time of discharge; SRL was added within the first 6 months and discontinued before the first year. (4) SRL as primary immunosuppression. (5) SRL as primary immunosuppression and discontinued before the first year. We used mortality and graft loss as the primary measures of outcome. We also quantified renal function using the change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the presence of biopsy proven acute cellular reject (ACR), and steroid-resistant rejection (SRR). There were no significant differences in mortality or graft loss. There was no difference in patient or graft survival. Patients that received SRL as primary immunosuppression had 50% less rejection compared to controls.

The impact of sirolimus on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

While some immunosuppression strategies may accelerate hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), the impact of sirolimus (SRL) is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of biopsy-proven HCV recurrence and patient survival using known and suspected risk factors for HCV recurrence as covariates.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 141 consecutive patients, including 88 who received de novo SRL therapy, who had undergone a first LT for HCV cirrhosis was conducted. Known and suspected risk factor covariates including transplant era, donor and recipient age, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, cold ischemia time, immunosuppressive drugs and steroid treatment rejection rates were used in the assessment.

RESULTS

Overall, 72.3% of the cohort developed biopsy-proven HCV recurrence. The incidence of HCV recurrence was not significantly different for patients treated with SRL (75% versus 69.8%; P=0.5). There was no difference found for time to recurrence, nor did mean activity or fibrosis scores differ at the time of initial recurrence. However, on follow-up using serial biopsies in patients with recurrence, the mean activity and fibrosis scores were significantly lower in the SRL group. Donor age and acute rejection episodes were the only factors affecting the HCV recurrence rate (expB 1.02 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.03]); P=0.03; and expB 2.8 [95% CI 1.8 to 4.3]; P<0.01], respectively). SRL treatment did not alter patient survival rates. Among patients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression, higher drug area under the curve levels were associated with a trend to lower disease activity and fibrosis at diagnosis; however, higher SRL levels were associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (P=0.038).

CONCLUSION

Results of the present analysis suggest that de novo SRL-based immunosuppression can be safely used in patients undergoing LT for HCV-associated liver disease; however, SRL-based immunosuppression did not significantly affect the timing or severity of post-transplant HCV recurrence. HCV recurrence in SRL-treated patients had lower progressive activity and fibrosis levels on serial biopsy.

Immunosuppressants: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in surgical techniques and combinations of conventional immunosuppressants have made paediatric liver transplantation the success story it is today. However, the increasing numbers of survivors reaching adulthood highlight important issues of long-term quality of life and drug induced complications. The aim of this review is to describe the trends and advances in immunosuppression for paediatric liver transplantation over the last 12 months.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

As our knowledge of the immune cell populations and intracellular mechanisms involved in alloreactivity improves, induction immunosuppression has emerged as a powerful therapeutic manoeuvre to counter the initial alloimmune response. Many centres have adopted a more focused use of biological agents at induction to improve immunosuppression in the critical peritransplant period and to reduce the level of subsequent maintenance requirements. Corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitors minimization trials have obtained encouraging results. New immunosuppressive strategies have evolved towards the goal of inducing operational tolerance, and paediatric liver transplant recipients seem to be a particularly promising target. New strategies are being developed also to improve quality of life and reduce nonadherence in adolescents and young adults who underwent liver transplantation. New drugs target B-cell and complement driven rejection and new monoclonal antibodies and small molecules are under trial to inhibit specific signals in the immune response.

SUMMARY

We review current trends of immunosuppressive protocols in paediatric liver transplantation, focusing on induction agents, corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitor sparing protocols, protocols for adult transition and new drugs currently under development.

An evidence-based multidisciplinary approach to the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): the Alberta HCC algorithm

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of only a few malignancies with an increasing incidence in North America. Because the vast majority of HCCs occur in the setting of a cirrhotic liver, management of this malignancy is best performed in a multidisciplinary group that recognizes the importance of liver function, as well as patient and tumour characteristics. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is preferred for HCC because it incorporates the tumour characteristics (ie, tumour-node-metastasis stage), the patient's performance status and liver function according to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification, and then links the BCLC stage to recommended therapeutic interventions. However, the BCLC algorithm does not recognize the potential role of radiofrequency ablation for very early stage HCC, the expanding role of liver transplantation in the management of HCC, the role of transarterial chemoembolization in single large tumours, the potential role of transarterial radioembolization with 90Yttrium and the limited evidence for using sorafenib in Child- Turcotte-Pugh class B cirrhotic patients. The current review article presents an evidence-based approach to the multidisciplinary management of HCC along with a new algorithm for the management of HCC that incorporates the BCLC staging system and the authors' local selection criteria for resection, ablative techniques, liver transplantation, transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization and sorafenib in Alberta.

Pilot study: rapamycin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal pathway is involved in hepatocarcinogenesis. Rapamycin (=sirolimus), a specific mTOR inhibitor, leads to G(1) arrest of many malignant cell lines and currently, analogues of rapamycin are being investigated as a cancer chemotherapeutic adjuvant.

AIM

To study the toxicity and tolerability of rapamycin therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Between June 2005 and February 2007, patients with advanced HCC, not eligible for any established therapy, were included in the study.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (F/M: 5/13) with compensated liver cirrhosis (Child A n = 11, Child B n = 5, Child C n = 2) and histologically proven HCC were included in this study. According to the BCLC staging system, most of the patients enrolled had an advanced HCC: BCLC stage B: n = 2, Barcelona Clinic Liver-Cancer (BCLC) stage C: n = 14, BCLC stage D: n = 2. Overall, therapy with rapamycin was well tolerated. Most common toxicities were thrombocytopaenia and anaemia. We did not observe any partial or complete tumour response. At 3 months, two patients had stable disease and at 6 months, all patients had progressed. The median overall survival was 5.27 months, median time to progression was 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Rapamycin is well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC, but only minimally effective.

The challenges of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide and liver transplantation (LT) has potentials to improve survival for patients with HCC. However, expansion of indications beyond Milan Criteria (MC) and use of bridging/downstaging procedures to convert intermediate-advanced stages of HCC within MC limits are counterbalanced by graft shortage and increasing use of marginal donors, partially limited by the use of donor-division protocols applied to the cadaveric and living-donor settings. Several challenges in technique, indications, pre-LT treatments and prioritization policies of patients on the waiting list have to be precised through prospective investigations that have to include individualization of prognosis, biological variables and pathology surrogates as stratification criteria. Also, liver resection has to be rejuvenated in the general algorithm of HCC treatment in the light of salvage transplantation strategies, while benefit of LT for HCC should be determined through newly designed composite scores that are able to capture both efficiency and equity endpoints. Innovative treatments such as radioembolization for HCC associated with portal vein thrombosis and molecular targeted compounds are likely to influence future strategies. Accepting this challenge has been part of the history of LT and will endure so also for the future.