Nanotechnology for Cell–Substrate Interactions

Fabrication methods of an engineered microenvironment for analysis of cell–biomaterial interactions

Success in tissue engineering requires an understanding of how cells integrate the signals presented from the microenvironment created by biomaterial scaffolds to alter their responses. Besides the presence of chemical stimuli, there is growing evidence that the spatial organization of cells and tissue within a 3-dimensional (3-D) extracellular matrix (ECM) context is a critical element in controlling cellular function. Therefore, in order to direct cells toward a desirable tissue structure, it is necessary to engineer biomaterials to have spatiotemporal control of the presentation of regulatory signals. Given that, micro-patterning techniques have profited by combining micro-fabrication technology with the chemical conjugation of biologically active molecules to provide new culture systems where cells can be cultured within a specific geometry. The micro-engineered environments have been developed as 2- and 3-D structures, which have proven greatly useful as versatile platforms to study cell, biomaterial, and ECM interactions on both macroscopic and microscopic levels. The main focus of this review is a brief summary of the use of micro-engineered substrates in the analysis of cell-biomaterial interactions with the aim to provide an introductory overview of practical applications available in the literature. In particular, topics regarding (1) the soft-lithography technique to prepare micro-patterned substrates for the spatial control of cell adhesion, (2) biomaterials stiffness-dependent cellular responses, and (3) the microarray techniques for analysis of cell/biomaterials interactions are discussed.

Molecular Engineering of Cellular Environments: Cell Adhesion to Nano‐Digital Surfaces

Engineering of the cellular microenvironment has become a valuable means to guide cellular activities such as spreading, motility, differentiation, proliferation, or apoptosis. This chapter summarizes recent approaches to surface patterning such as topography and chemical patterning from the micrometer to the nanometer scale, and illustrates their application to cellular studies. Particular attention is devoted to nanolithography with self-assembled diblock copolymer micelles that are biofunctionalized with peptide ligands-a method that offers unsurpassed spatial resolution for the positioning of signaling molecules over extended surface areas. Such interfaces are defined here as "nano-digital surfaces," since they enable the counting of individual signaling complexes separated by a biologically inert background. The approach enables the testing of cellular responses to individual signaling molecules as well as their spatial ordering. Detailed consideration is also given to the fact that protein clusters such as those found at focal adhesion sites represent, to a large extent, hierarchically organized cooperativity among various proteins.

Nanotechnology and biomaterials for orthopedic medical applications

Future prospects for nanotechnology and biomaterials in medical applications appear to be excellent. In orthopedic applications, there is a significant need and demand for the development of a bone substitute that is bioactive and exhibits material properties (mechanical and surface) comparable with those of natural, healthy bone. Particularly, in bone tissue engineering, nanometer-sized ceramics, polymers, metals and composites have been receiving much attention recently. This is a result of current conventional materials (or those materials with constituent dimensions >1 µm) that have not invoked suitable cellular responses to promote adequate osteointegration to enable these devices to be successful for long periods. By contrast, owing to their ability to mimic the dimensions of constituent components of natural bone (e.g., proteins and hydroxyapatite), nanophase materials may be an exciting successful alternative orthopedic implant material. In this article, the ability of novel nanomaterials that promote osteointegration is discussed. Potential pitfalls or undesirable side effects associated with the use of nanomaterials in orthopedic applications are also reviewed.