Carotenoids in photosynthesis. I. Location in photosynthetic membranes and light-harvesting function

Structure of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein complex from plant photosynthetic membranes at 7 A resolution in projection

The structure of thin three-dimensional crystals of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein complex, an integral membrane protein from the photosynthetic membrane of chloroplasts, has been determined at 7 A (1 A = 0.1 nm) resolution in projection. The structure analysis was carried out by image processing of low-dose electron micrographs, and electron diffraction of thin three-dimensional crystals preserved in tannin. The three-dimensional crystals appeared to be stacks of two-dimensional crystals having p321 symmetry. Results of the image analysis indicated that the crystals were disordered, due to random translational displacement of stacked layers. This was established by a translation search routine that used the low-resolution projection of a single layer as a reference. The reference map was derived from the symmetrized average of two images that showed features consistent with the projected structure of negatively stained two-dimensional crystals. The phase shift resulting from the displacement of each layer was corrected. Phase shifts were then refined by minimizing the phase residual, bringing all layers to the same phase origin. Refined phases from different images were in agreement and reliable to 7 A resolution. A projection map was generated from the averaged phases and electron diffraction amplitudes. The map showed that the complex was a trimer composed of three protein monomers related by 3-fold symmetry. The projected density within the protein monomer suggested membrane-spanning alpha-helices roughly perpendicular to the crystal plane. The density in the centre and on the periphery of the trimeric complex was lower than that of the protein, indicating that this region contained low-density matter, such as lipids and antenna chlorophylls.

Purification and characterization of a light-harvesting chlorophyll-a/b-protein of photosystem I of Lemna gibba

The photosystem I (PSI) complex of Lemna gibba, isolated by deriphat/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of thylakoids solubilized in glycosidic surfactants, has been fractionated into its two chlorophyll-protein complexes: a core component (CCI) and a light-harvesting component (LHCI), using either non-denaturing gel electrophoresis or ion-exchange chromatography/sucrose gradient centrifugation. Both methods yielded an LHCI component that contained only one apoprotein of approximately 20 kDa. All the chlorophyll b and lutein of the PSI complex is associated with this LHCI preparation. The chlorophyll a/b ratio of this chlorophyll-protein is 2.5, and lutein is essentially the only carotenoid present. While the purified LHCI from Lemna cross-reacts with antibodies raised against spinach LHCPIb of Lam et al. [FEBS Lett. 168, 10-14 (1984)], no cross-reactivity occurred between it and the major light-harvesting chlorophyll-a/b-protein of PSII, LHCII beta. This and a comparison of the amino acid and pigment compositions of the apoproteins of the LHCI and LHCII beta chlorophyll-proteins indicate that these are two distinct but similar chlorophyll-proteins.

Energy transfer and pigment composition in three chlorophyll b-containing light-harvesting complexes isolated from Mantoniella squamata (Prasinophyceae), Chlorella fusca (Chlorophyceae) and Sinapis alba

Light-harvesting Chl a/b protein complexes were isolated from the higher plant Sinapis alba, the green alga Chlorella fusca, and the prasinophycean alga Mantoniella squamata by mild gel electrophoresis. The energy transfer from chlorophyll b and the accessory xanthophyll was measured by means of fluoresence spectroscopy at 77 K. The pigment composition of the isolated antenna complexes was determined by high performance liquid chromatography in order to calculate the number of light absorbing molecules per chlorophyll a in the different light-harvesting complexes. These results were complemented by the quantitation of the pigments in total thylakoids as well as in the different electrophoretic fractions. On the basis of these data the in vivo ratios of xanthophylls per chlorophyll a could be estimated. The results show that the light-harvesting complexes from Chlorella and from Sinapis exhibit identical ratios of total xanthophylls per chlorophyll a. By contrast, in the prasinophycean alga Mantoniella, the light-harvesting complex markedly differs from the other chlorophyll b containing proteins. It contains, in addition to neoxanthin and violaxanthin, high amounts of prasinoxanthin and its epoxide, which contribute significantly to light absorption. The concentration of chlorophyll b in the complex is very much higher in the antenna of Mantoniella than in those of Chlorella and Sinapis. Furthermore, it must be emphasized that in addition to chlorophyll b, a third chlorophyll species acts in the energy transfer to chlorophyll a. This chlorophyll c-like pigment is found to be present in a concentration which improves very efficiently the absorption in blue light. In light of these results it can be concluded that the absorption cross section in Mantoniella is higher not only because of an enhanced number of light-harvesting particles in the membrane, but also because of a higher ratio of accessory pigments to chlorophyll a.

How carotenoids function in photosynthetic bacteria

Carotenoids are essential for the survival of photosynthetic organisms. They function as light-harvesting molecules and provide photoprotection. In this review, the molecular features which determine the efficiencies of the various photophysical and photochemical processes of carotenoids are discussed. The behavior of carotenoids in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers and light-harvesting complexes is correlated with data from experiments carried out on carotenoids and model systems in vitro. The status of the carotenoid structural determinations in vivo is reviewed.

Oxygen-regulated mRNAs for light-harvesting and reaction center complexes and for bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus during the shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth

The stability and regulation by oxygen of mRNAs for the photosynthetic apparatus in Rhodobacter capsulatus have been studied by using proflavin to inhibit transcription and by shifting cells from anaerobic to aerobic conditions. The results from the inhibition experiments show that the mRNA for the light-harvesting LH-II polypeptides (beta, alpha) is more stable than that for the light-harvesting LH-I polypeptides (beta, alpha) during anaerobic growth, whereas the mRNAs for the reaction center polypeptides L (RC-L), M (RC-M), and H (RC-H) are less stable than both the LH-I and LH-II mRNAs. When photosynthetic cells are shifted from anaerobic to aerobic conditions, an immediate decrease in the levels of mRNA for the LH-I, LH-II, RC-L, RC-M, and RC-H proteins was observed. The level of mRNA for the LH-II proteins, however, is more sensitive to oxygen and is reduced faster than the level of mRNA for the LH-I proteins. These results suggest that oxygen represses the expression of genes coding for the light-harvesting antenna and reaction center complexes and may selectively accelerate the degradation of mRNA for the LH-II proteins. The mRNAs for several enzymes in the bacteriochlorophyll biosynthetic pathway are regulated by oxygen in a similar manner. The mRNAs for carotenoid biosynthetic enzymes, however, are regulated by oxygen in a different way. We have found that the amounts of mRNAs for carotenoid biosynthetic enzyme, relative to the amounts of mRNAs for LH and RC, increased during the shift from anaerobic to aerobic conditions. We have particularly shown that although the expression of most photosynthetic genes in R. capsulatus is repressed by oxygen, the crtA gene, located in the BamHI H fragment of the R' plasmid pRPS404 and responsible for the oxidation of spheroidene to spheroidenone, responds to oxygen in an opposite fashion. This exzymatic oxidation may protect the photosynthetic apparatus from photooxidative damage.