201
|
Graham LJ, Spake R, Gillings S, Watts K, Eigenbrod F. Incorporating fine-scale environmental heterogeneity into broad-extent models. Methods Ecol Evol 2019; 10:767-778. [PMID: 31244985 PMCID: PMC6582547 DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
A key aim of ecology is to understand the drivers of ecological patterns, so that we can accurately predict the effects of global environmental change. However, in many cases, predictors are measured at a finer resolution than the ecological response. We therefore require data aggregation methods that avoid loss of information on fine-grain heterogeneity.We present a data aggregation method that, unlike current approaches, reduces the loss of information on fine-grain spatial structure in environmental heterogeneity for use with coarse-grain ecological datasets. Our method contains three steps: (a) define analysis scales (predictor grain, response grain, scale-of-effect); (b) use a moving window to calculate a measure of variability in environment (predictor grain) at the process-relevant scale (scale-of-effect); and (c) aggregate the moving window calculations to the coarsest resolution (response grain). We show the theoretical basis for our method using simulated landscapes and the practical utility with a case study. Our method is available as the grainchanger r package.The simulations show that information about spatial structure is captured that would have been lost using a direct aggregation approach, and that our method is particularly useful in landscapes with spatial autocorrelation in the environmental predictor variable (e.g. fragmented landscapes) and when the scale-of-effect is small relative to the response grain. We use our data aggregation method to find the appropriate scale-of-effect of land cover diversity on Eurasian jay Garrulus glandarius abundance in the UK. We then model the interactive effect of land cover heterogeneity and temperature on G. glandarius abundance. Our method enables us quantify this interaction despite the different scales at which these factors influence G. glandarius abundance.Our data aggregation method allows us to integrate variables that act at varying scales into one model with limited loss of information, which has wide applicability for spatial analyses beyond the specific ecological context considered here. Key ecological applications include being able to estimate the interactive effect of drivers that vary at different scales (such as climate and land cover), and to systematically examine the scale dependence of the effects of environmental heterogeneity in combination with the effects of climate change on biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca Spake
- Geography and EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | | | - Kevin Watts
- Forest ResearchCentre for Ecosystems, Society & BiosecuritySurreyUK
- Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK
| | - Felix Eigenbrod
- Geography and EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Abundance estimates and habitat preferences of bottlenose dolphins reveal the importance of two gulfs in South Australia. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8044. [PMID: 31142765 PMCID: PMC6541621 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44310-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Informed conservation management of marine mammals requires an understanding of population size and habitat preferences. In Australia, such data are needed for the assessment and mitigation of anthropogenic impacts, including fisheries interactions, coastal zone developments, oil and gas exploration and mining activities. Here, we present large-scale estimates of abundance, density and habitat preferences of southern Australian bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) over an area of 42,438km2 within two gulfs of South Australia. Using double-observer platform aerial surveys over four strata and mark-recapture distance sampling analyses, we estimated 3,493 (CV = 0.21; 95%CI = 2,327-5,244) dolphins in summer/autumn, and 3,213 (CV = 0.20; 95%CI = 2,151-4,801) in winter/spring of 2011. Bottlenose dolphin abundance and density was higher in gulf waters across both seasons (0.09-0.24 dolphins/km2) compared to adjacent shelf waters (0.004-0.04 dolphins/km2). The high densities of bottlenose dolphins in the two gulfs highlight the importance of these gulfs as a habitat for the species. Habitat modelling associated bottlenose dolphins with shallow waters, flat seafloor topography, and higher sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in summer/autumn and lower SSTs in winter/spring. Spatial predictions showed high dolphin densities in northern and coastal gulf sections. Distributional data should inform management strategies, marine park planning and environmental assessments of potential anthropogenic threats to this protected species.
Collapse
|
204
|
Bouchet PJ, Peterson AT, Zurell D, Dormann CF, Schoeman D, Ross RE, Snelgrove P, Sequeira AMM, Whittingham MJ, Wang L, Rapacciuolo G, Oppel S, Mellin C, Lauria V, Krishnakumar PK, Jones AR, Heinänen S, Heikkinen RK, Gregr EJ, Fielding AH, Caley MJ, Barbosa AM, Bamford AJ, Lozano-Montes H, Parnell S, Wenger S, Yates KL. Better Model Transfers Require Knowledge of Mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol 2019; 34:489-490. [PMID: 31054858 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Phil J Bouchet
- Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modelling, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
| | | | - Damaris Zurell
- Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Dept. Landscape Dynamics, Zuercherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Geography Dept., Unter den Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten F Dormann
- Biometry & Environmental System Analysis, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - David Schoeman
- School of Science & Engineering, The University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia; Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
| | - Rebecca E Ross
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK; Institute for Marine Research, Nordnesgaten 50, 5005 Bergen, Norway
| | - Paul Snelgrove
- Department of Ocean Sciences and Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
| | - Ana M M Sequeira
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; IOMRC and The University of Western Australia Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Mark J Whittingham
- Biology, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Lifei Wang
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada; Gulf of Maine Research Institute, Portland, ME 04101, USA
| | | | - Steffen Oppel
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Camille Mellin
- The Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No 3, Townsville 4810, QLD, Australia
| | - Valentina Lauria
- Istituto per l'Ambiente Marino Costiero, IAMC-CNR, Mazara del Vallo, Trapani, Italy
| | - Periyadan K Krishnakumar
- Center for Environment and Water, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alice R Jones
- The Environment Institute and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Stefan Heinänen
- DHI, Ecology and Environment Department, Agern Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark; Novia University of Applied Sciences, Raseborgsvägen 9, 10600 Ekenäs, Finland
| | - Risto K Heikkinen
- Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity Centre, PO Box 140, FIN- 00251 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Edward J Gregr
- Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, AERL Building, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada; SciTec h Environmental Consulting, 2136 Napier Street, Vancouver, BC V5L 2N9, Canada
| | | | - M Julian Caley
- ARC Centre for Excellence in Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - A Márcia Barbosa
- Centro de Investigação em Ciências Geo-Espaciais, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Observatório Astronómico Prof. Manuel de Barros, Alameda do Monte da Virgem, 4430-146 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Andrew J Bamford
- Wildfowl &Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire, GL2 7BT, UK
| | - Hector Lozano-Montes
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Stephen Parnell
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Seth Wenger
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30601, USA
| | - Katherine L Yates
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Paril JF, Fournier-Level AJ. instaGraminoid, a Novel Colorimetric Method to Assess Herbicide Resistance, Identifies Patterns of Cross-Resistance in Annual Ryegrass. PLANT PHENOMICS (WASHINGTON, D.C.) 2019; 2019:7937156. [PMID: 33313537 PMCID: PMC7718631 DOI: 10.34133/2019/7937156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Herbicide resistance in agricultural weeds is a global problem with an increasing understanding that it is caused by multiple genes leading to quantitative resistance. These quantitative patterns of resistance are not easy to decipher with mortality assays alone, and there is a need for straightforward and unbiased protocols to accurately assess quantitative herbicide resistance. instaGraminoid-a computer vision and statistical analysis package-was developed as an automated and scalable method for quantifying herbicide resistance. The package was tested in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum), the most noxious and highly resistant weed in Australia and the Mediterranean region. This method provides quantitative measures of the degree of chlorosis and necrosis of individual plants which was shown to accurately reflect herbicide resistance. We were able to reliably characterise resistance to four herbicides with different sites of action (glyphosate, sulfometuron, terbuthylazine, and trifluralin) in two L. rigidum populations from Southeast Australia. Cross-validation of the method across populations and herbicide treatments showed high repeatability and transferability. Significant positive correlations in resistance of individual plants were observed across herbicides, which suggest either the accumulation of herbicide-specific resistance alleles in single genotypes (multiple stacked resistance) or the presence of general broad-effects resistance alleles (cross-resistance). We used these quantitative estimates of cross-resistance to simulate how resistance development under an herbicide rotation strategy is likely to be higher than expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson F. Paril
- School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
206
|
Regos A, Gagne L, Alcaraz-Segura D, Honrado JP, Domínguez J. Effects of species traits and environmental predictors on performance and transferability of ecological niche models. Sci Rep 2019; 9:4221. [PMID: 30862919 PMCID: PMC6414724 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40766-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability of ecological niche models (ENMs) to produce robust predictions for different time frames (i.e. temporal transferability) may be hindered by a lack of ecologically relevant predictors. Model performance may also be affected by species traits, which may reflect different responses to processes controlling species distribution. In this study, we tested four primary hypotheses involving the role of species traits and environmental predictors in ENM performance and transferability. We compared the predictive accuracy of ENMs based upon (1) climate, (2) land-use/cover (LULC) and (3) ecosystem functional attributes (EFAs), and (4) the combination of these factors for 27 bird species within and beyond the time frame of model calibration. The combination of these factors significantly increased both model performance and transferability, highlighting the need to integrate climate, LULC and EFAs to improve biodiversity projections. However, the overall model transferability was low (being only acceptable for less than 25% of species), even under a hierarchical modelling approach, which calls for great caution in the use of ENMs to predict bird distributions under global change scenarios. Our findings also indicate that positive effects of species traits on predictive accuracy within model calibration are not necessarily translated into higher temporal transferability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrián Regos
- Departamento de Zooloxía, Xenética e Antropoloxía Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
- Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (CIBIO/InBIO), Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal.
| | - Laura Gagne
- Universitè de Niza Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
- Department of Botany and Inter-Universitary Institute for Earth System Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Andalusian Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Global Change (CAESCG), University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | - João P Honrado
- Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (CIBIO/InBIO), Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal
- Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jesús Domínguez
- Departamento de Zooloxía, Xenética e Antropoloxía Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Radchuk V, Kramer-Schadt S, Grimm V. Transferability of Mechanistic Ecological Models Is About Emergence. Trends Ecol Evol 2019; 34:487-488. [PMID: 30795841 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoriia Radchuk
- Department of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Stephanie Kramer-Schadt
- Department of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, Berlin, Germany; Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Rothenburgstrasse 12, 12165 Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Grimm
- Department of Ecological Modelling, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, Leipzig, Germany; Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Maulbeerallee 2, Potsdam, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Ashraf U, Chaudhry MN, Ahmad SR, Ashraf I, Arslan M, Noor H, Jabbar M. Impacts of climate change on Capparis spinosa L. based on ecological niche modeling. PeerJ 2018; 6:e5792. [PMID: 30356932 PMCID: PMC6195109 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent changes in climate are transforming the situation of life on Earth, including impacting the conservation status of many plant and animal species. This study aims to evaluate potential impacts of climate change on a medicinal plant that is known to be heat-tolerant, Capparis spinosa L. We used ecological niche modeling to estimate current and future potential distributions for the species, considering two emissions scenarios and five climate models for two time periods (2050 and 2070). The results in terms of areal coverage at different suitability levels in the future were closely similar to its present-day distribution; indeed, only minor differences existed in highly suitable area, with increases of only 0.2-0.3% in suitable area for 2050 and 2070 under representative concentration pathway 4.5. Given that climate-mediated range shifts in the species are expected to be minor, conservation attention to this species can focus on minimizing local effects of anthropogenic activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uzma Ashraf
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.,College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad N Chaudhry
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Sajid R Ahmad
- College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Irfan Ashraf
- College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.,Strategic Policy Unit, Lahore Development Authority, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Arslan
- Environmental Biotechnology Department, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hassaan Noor
- College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Mobeen Jabbar
- College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|