Signaling by G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR): studies on the GnRH receptor

Pulsatile and sustained gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor signaling: does the ERK signaling pathway decode GnRH pulse frequency?

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) acts via G-protein-coupled receptors on gonadotrophs to stimulate synthesis and secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. It is secreted in pulses, and its effects depend on pulse frequency, but decoding mechanisms are unknown. Here we have used an extracellular signal regulated kinase-green fluorescent protein (ERK2-GFP) reporter to monitor GnRH signaling. GnRH caused dose-dependent ERK2-GFP translocation to the nucleus, providing a live-cell readout for activation. Pulsatile GnRH caused dose- and frequency-dependent ERK2-GFP translocation. These responses were rapid and transient, showed only digital tracking, and did not desensitize under any condition tested (dose, frequency, and receptor number varied). We also tested for the effects of cycloheximide (to prevent induction of nuclear-inducible MAPK phosphatases) and used GFP fusions containing ERK mutations (D319N, which prevents docking domain-dependent binding to MAPK phosphatases, and K52R, which prevents catalytic activity). These manipulations had little or no effect on the translocation responses, arguing against a role for MAPK phosphatases or ERK-mediated feedback in shaping ERK activation during pulsatile stimulation. GnRH also caused dose- and frequency-dependent activation of the alpha-gonadotropin subunit-, luteinizing hormone beta-, and follicle-stimulating hormone beta- luciferase reporters, and the latter response was inhibited by ERK1/2 knockdown. Moreover, GnRH caused frequency-dependent activation of an Egr1-luciferase reporter, but the response was proportional to cumulative pulse duration. Our data suggest that frequency decoding is not due to negative feedback shaping ERK signaling in this model.

Pin1 facilitates the phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination of SF-1 to regulate gonadotropin beta-subunit gene transcription

Pin1 is a peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase which catalyzes the isomerization of phosphorylated Ser/Thr-Pro peptide bonds. Pin1 knockout mice have marked abnormalities in their reproductive development and function. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying their reproductive defects are poorly understood. Herein, we demonstrate that Pin1 is required for both basal and GnRH-induced gonadotropin beta-subunit gene transcription, through interactions with the transcription factors SF-1, Pitx1, and Egr-1. Pin1 activates transcription of the gonadotropin beta-subunit genes synergistically with these transcription factors, either by modulating their stability or by increasing their protein-protein interactions. Notably, we provide evidence that Pin1 is required for the Ser203 phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination of SF-1, which facilitates SF-1-Pitx1 interactions and therefore results in an enhancement of SF-1 transcriptional activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that in gonadotrope cells, sufficient levels of activated Pin1 are maintained through transcriptional and posttranslational regulation by GnRH-induced signaling cascades. Our results suggest that Pin1 functions as a novel player in GnRH-induced signal pathways and is involved in gonadotropin beta-subunit gene transcription by modulating the activity of various specific transcription factors.

Hormones in synergy: regulation of the pituitary gonadotropin genes

The precise interplay of hormonal influences that governs gonadotropin hormone production by the pituitary includes endocrine, paracrine and autocrine actions of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), activin and steroids. However, most studies of hormonal regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the pituitary gonadotrope have been limited to analyses of the isolated actions of individual hormones. LHbeta and FSHbeta subunits have distinct patterns of expression during the menstrual/estrous cycle as a result of the integration of activin, GnRH, and steroid hormone action. In this review, we focus on studies that delineate the interplay among these hormones in the regulation of LHbeta and FSHbeta gene expression in gonadotrope cells and discuss how signaling cross-talk contributes to differential expression. We also discuss how recent technological advances will help identify additional factors involved in the differential hormonal regulation of LH and FSH.

Pulsatile GnRH secretion: roles of G protein-coupled receptors, second messengers and ion channels

The pulsatile secretion of GnRH from normal and immortalized hypothalamic GnRH neurons is highly calcium-dependent and is stimulated by cAMP. It is also influenced by agonist activation of the endogenous GnRH receptor (GnRH-R), which couples to multiple G proteins. This autocrine mechanism could serve as a timer to determine the frequency of pulsatile GnRH release by regulating Ca(2+)- and cAMP-dependent signaling and GnRH neuronal firing. The firing of individual and/or bursts of action potentials (APs) in spontaneously active GnRH neurons is followed by afterhyperpolarization (AHP) that lasts from several milliseconds to several seconds. GnRH-induced activation of GnRH neurons causes a significant increase in medium AHP that is partially sensitive to apamin. GnRH-induced modulation of Ca(2+) influx and the consequent changes in AHP current suggest that the GnRH receptors expressed in hypothalamic GnRH neurons are important modulators of their neuronal excitability. The coexistence of multiple regulatory mechanisms could provide a high degree of redundancy in the maintenance of this crucial component of the reproductive process. It is also conceivable that this multifactorial system could reflect the gradation from simple to more complex neuroendocrine control systems for regulating hypothalamo-pituitary function and gonadal activity during the evolution of the GnRH pulse generator.

Hormonal signaling to follicle stimulating hormone beta-subunit gene expression

Expression of the hormone-specific beta-subunit of follicle stimulating hormone (FSHbeta) is regulated primarily by gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and activin, with additional feedback by various steroids. While the nature of this hormonal regulation appears conserved, the molecular mechanisms mediating these effects appear less so. This is apparent from the diverse cis-elements required for hormonal stimulation in different species, distinct transcription factors that seem to mediate the effects, as well as the lack of conservation of several reportedly functional cis-elements across species. Recent additional information on the molecular mechanisms through which these regulatory hormones exert their effects, supports the possibility of species-specific mechanisms of regulation, while some redundancy may exist in signaling by the activated transcription factors which allows preservation of the hormonal regulation in these different promoter contexts.

Pulsatile and sustained gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor signaling: does the Ca2+/NFAT signaling pathway decode GnRH pulse frequency?

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) acts via 7 transmembrane region receptors on gonadotrophs to stimulate synthesis and secretion of the luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. It is secreted in pulses, and its effects depend on pulse frequency, but decoding mechanisms are unknown. Here we have used (nuclear factor of activated T-cells 2 (NFAT2)-emerald fluorescent protein) to monitor GnRH signaling. Increasing [Ca²⁺]_i causes calmodulin/calcineurin-dependent nuclear NFAT translocation, a response involving proteins (calmodulins and NFATs) that decode frequency in other systems. Using live cell imaging, pulsatile GnRH caused dose- and frequency-dependent increases in nuclear NFAT2-emerald fluorescent protein, and at low frequency, translocation simply tracked GnRH exposure (albeit with slower kinetics). At high frequency (30-min intervals), failure to return to basal conditions before repeat stimulation caused integrative tracking, illustrating how the relative dynamics of up- and downstream signals can increase efficiency of GnRH action. Mathematical modeling predicted desensitization of GnRH effects on [Ca²⁺]_i and that desensitization would increase with dose, frequency, and receptor number, but no such desensitization was seen in HeLa and/or LβT2 cells possibly because pulsatile GnRH did not reduce receptor expression (measured by immunofluorescence). GnRH also caused dose- and frequency-dependent activation of αGSU, luteinizing hormone β, and follicle-stimulating hormone β luciferase reporters, effects that were blocked by calcineurin inhibition. Pulsatile GnRH also activated an NFAT-responsive luciferase reporter, but this response was directly related to cumulative pulse duration. This together with the lack of desensitization of translocation responses suggests that NFAT may mediate GnRH action but is not a genuine decoder of GnRH pulse frequency.

Key signaling molecules in pituitary tumors

In pituitary tumorigenesis there is cross-talk between fine deregulation of intracellular pathways and complex microenvironmental factors, processes that can be modulated at various levels. The signaling pathways of growth, angiogenic factors and hormones are intricate; therefore, alterations induced upon node-molecules can lead to aberrant proliferation. The demonstrated overactivity of AKT and MAPK pathways qualifies them as valuable targets for inhibition mediated by somatostatin analogues. An increasing body of evidence suggests clinically significant implications of PTTG1 in correlation with aggressive phenotypes or survival rate, thus PTTG1 is an interesting candidate biomarker for malignancy, tumor staging and subsequent therapeutic interventions. Future work should focus on understanding the molecular mechanisms that control pituitary tumor transformation, where intracellular signaling molecules will constitute not only diagnostic/prognostic markers but also novel therapeutic targets.

A novel virus-like particle based on hepatitis B core antigen and substrate-binding domain of bacterial molecular chaperone DnaK

Hepatitis B virus core (HBc) protein has been proved to be an attractive carrier for foreign epitopes, and can display green fluorescent protein (GFP) on its surface. The structure of substrate-binding domain of DnaK [DnaK (394-504 aa), DnaK SBD] is similar to GFP, we therefore reasoned that DnaK SBD might also be tolerated. Electron microscopic observations suggested that the chimeric proteins containing the truncated HBc (HBcDelta) and DnaK SBD could self-assemble into virus-like particle (VLP). Then the accessibility of DnaK SBD and the adjuvanticity of VLP HBcDelta-SBD were demonstrated by two recombinant peptide vaccines against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), GhM and GhMNR. The latter carries in addition the peptide motif NRLLLTG which is known to bind to DnaK and DnaK SBD. The combination of VLP HBcDelta-SBD and GhMNR elicited stronger humoral responses and caused further testicular atrophy than the combinations of VLP HBcDelta and GhMNR or VLP HBcDelta-SBD and GhM in Balb/c mice. These findings indicate VLP HBcDelta-SBD might serve as an excellent carrier for GhMNR and some other peptide vaccines.

A preformed signaling complex mediates GnRH-activated ERK phosphorylation of paxillin and FAK at focal adhesions in L beta T2 gonadotrope cells

Most receptor tyrosine kinases and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) operate via a limited number of MAPK cascades but still exert diverse functions, and therefore signal specificity remains an enigma. Also, most GPCR ligands utilize families of receptors for mediation of diverse biological actions; however, the mammalian type I GnRH receptor (GnRHR) seems to be the sole receptor mediating GnRH-induced gonadotropin synthesis and release. Signaling complexes associated with GPCRs may thus provide the means for signal specificity. Here we describe a signaling complex associated with the GnRHR, which is a unique GPCR lacking a C-terminal tail. Unlike other GPCRs, this signaling complex is preformed, and exposure of L beta T2 gonadotropes to GnRH induces its dynamic rearrangement. The signaling complex includes c-Src, protein kinase C delta, -epsilon, and -alpha, Ras, MAPK kinase 1/2, ERK1/2, tubulin, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), paxillin, vinculin, caveolin-1, kinase suppressor of Ras-1, and the GnRHR. Exposure to GnRH (5 min) causes MAPK kinase 1/2, ERK1/2, tubulin, vinculin, and the GnRHR to detach from c-Src, but they reassociate within 30 min. On the other hand, FAK, paxillin, the protein kinase Cs, and caveolin-1 stay bound to c-Src, whereas kinase suppressor of Ras-1 appears in the complex only 30 min after GnRH stimulation. GnRH was found to activate ERK1/2 in the complex in a c-Src-dependent manner, and the activated ERK1/2 subsequently phosphorylates FAK and paxillin. In parallel, caveolin-1, FAK, vinculin, and paxillin are phosphorylated on Tyr residues apparently by GnRH-activated c-Src. Receptor tyrosine kinases and GPCRs translocate ERK1/2 to the nucleus to phosphorylate and activate transcription factors. We therefore propose that the role of the multiprotein signaling complex is to sequester a cytosolic pool of activated ERK1/2 to phosphorylate FAK and paxillin at focal adhesions.