201
|
Hanley CJ, Burianová H, Tommerdahl M. Towards Establishing Age-Related Cortical Plasticity on the Basis of Somatosensation. Neuroscience 2019; 404:407-412. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
202
|
Salvadó G, Molinuevo JL, Brugulat-Serrat A, Falcon C, Grau-Rivera O, Suárez-Calvet M, Pavia J, Niñerola-Baizán A, Perissinotti A, Lomeña F, Minguillon C, Fauria K, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Gispert JD. Centiloid cut-off values for optimal agreement between PET and CSF core AD biomarkers. Alzheimers Res Ther 2019; 11:27. [PMID: 30902090 PMCID: PMC6429814 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-019-0478-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centiloid scale has been developed to standardize measurements of amyloid PET imaging. Reference cut-off values of this continuous measurement enable the consistent operationalization of decision-making for multicentre research studies and clinical trials. In this study, we aimed at deriving reference Centiloid thresholds that maximize the agreement against core Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in two large independent cohorts. METHODS A total of 516 participants of the ALFA+ Study (N = 205) and ADNI (N = 311) underwent amyloid PET imaging ([18F]flutemetamol and [18F]florbetapir, respectively) and core AD CSF biomarker determination using Elecsys® tests. Tracer uptake was quantified in Centiloid units (CL). Optimal Centiloid cut-offs were sought that maximize the agreement between PET and dichotomous determinations based on CSF levels of Aβ42, tTau, pTau, and their ratios, using pre-established reference cut-off values. To this end, a receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) was conducted, and Centiloid cut-offs were calculated as those that maximized the Youden's J Index or the overall percentage agreement recorded. RESULTS All Centiloid cut-offs fell within the range of 25-35, except for CSF Aβ42 that rendered an optimal cut-off value of 12 CL. As expected, the agreement of tau/Aβ42 ratios was higher than that of CSF Aβ42. Centiloid cut-off robustness was confirmed even when established in an independent cohort and against variations of CSF cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS A cut-off of 12 CL matches previously reported values derived against postmortem measures of AD neuropathology. Together with these previous findings, our results flag two relevant inflection points that would serve as boundary of different stages of amyloid pathology: one around 12 CL that marks the transition from the absence of pathology to subtle pathology and another one around 30 CL indicating the presence of established pathology. The derivation of robust and generalizable cut-offs for core AD biomarkers requires cohorts with adequate representation of intermediate levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION ALFA+ Study, NCT02485730 ALFA PET Sub-study, NCT02685969.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Brugulat-Serrat
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Falcon
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Bioengeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
| | - Oriol Grau-Rivera
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Suárez-Calvet
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Pavia
- CIBER de Bioengeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Instititut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Carolina Minguillon
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Karine Fauria
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Wellington 30, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Bioengeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
203
|
Dehghani C, Frost S, Jayasena R, Masters CL, Kanagasingam Y. Ocular Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: The Role of Anterior Eye and Potential Future Directions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019; 59:3554-3563. [PMID: 30025102 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-24694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing health and economic challenge that has no effective cure. Recent clinical trials indicate that preclinical treatment may be required but a routine screening tool for AD has been elusive. Hence, a simple, yet sensitive biomarker for preclinical AD, when the disease is most likely to be amenable to treatment, is lacking. Due to several features, the eye has been explored for this purpose and, among the ocular tissues, the retina has received the most attention. Currently, major works investigating the potential AD diagnosis by detecting amyloid-β (Aβ) signatures in the retinal tissue are underway, while the anterior eye is more accessible for in vivo imaging and examination. This report provides a concise review of current literature on the anterior eye components, including the crystalline lens, cornea, and aqueous humor, in AD. We also discuss the potential for assessment of the corneal nerve structure and regeneration as well as conjunctival tissue for AD-related alterations. The crystalline lens has received considerable attention, but further research is required to confirm whether Aβ accumulates in the lens and whether it mirrors brain neuropathologic changes, particularly in preclinical AD. The rich corneal neural network and conjunctival vasculature also merit exploration in future studies to shed light on their potential association with AD pathologic changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cirous Dehghani
- Australian e-Health Research Center, CSIRO, Parkville, Australia
| | - Shaun Frost
- Australian e-Health Research Center, CSIRO, Perth, Australia
| | - Rajiv Jayasena
- Australian e-Health Research Center, CSIRO, Parkville, Australia
| | - Colin L Masters
- The Florey Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
204
|
Wang Q, Wang Y, Liu J, Sutphen CL, Cruchaga C, Blazey T, Gordon BA, Su Y, Chen C, Shimony JS, Ances BM, Cairns NJ, Fagan AM, Morris JC, Benzinger TLS. Quantification of white matter cellularity and damage in preclinical and early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 22:101767. [PMID: 30901713 PMCID: PMC6428957 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Interest in understanding the roles of white matter (WM) inflammation and damage in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease (AD) has been growing significantly in recent years. However, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for imaging inflammation are still lacking. An advanced diffusion-based MRI method, neuro-inflammation imaging (NII), has been developed to clinically image and quantify WM inflammation and damage in AD. Here, we employed NII measures in conjunction with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker classification (for β-amyloid (Aβ) and neurodegeneration) to evaluate 200 participants in an ongoing study of memory and aging. Elevated NII-derived cellular diffusivity was observed in both preclinical and early symptomatic phases of AD, while disruption of WM integrity, as detected by decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) and increased radial diffusivity (RD), was only observed in the symptomatic phase of AD. This may suggest that WM inflammation occurs earlier than WM damage following abnormal Aβ accumulation in AD. The negative correlation between NII-derived cellular diffusivity and CSF Aβ42 level (a marker of amyloidosis) may indicate that WM inflammation is associated with increasing Aβ burden. NII-derived FA also negatively correlated with CSF t-tau level (a marker of neurodegeneration), suggesting that disruption of WM integrity is associated with increasing neurodegeneration. Our findings demonstrated the capability of NII to simultaneously image and quantify WM cellularity changes and damage in preclinical and early symptomatic AD. NII may serve as a clinically feasible imaging tool to study the individual and composite roles of WM inflammation and damage in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Wang
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Yong Wang
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Engineering & Applied Science, St. Louis, MO 63015, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Jingxia Liu
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Courtney L Sutphen
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Carlos Cruchaga
- Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Tyler Blazey
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Brian A Gordon
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Yi Su
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Charlie Chen
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Joshua S Shimony
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Beau M Ances
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Nigel J Cairns
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Anne M Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Tammie L S Benzinger
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, 4488 Forest Park, Suite 101, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Vos SJB, Duara R. The prognostic value of ATN Alzheimer biomarker profiles in cognitively normal individuals. Neurology 2019; 92:643-644. [PMID: 30842299 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J B Vos
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology (S.J.B.V.), School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Wien Center for Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders (R.D.), Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach; and Department of Neurology (R.D.), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
| | - Ranjan Duara
- From the Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology (S.J.B.V.), School for Mental Health and NeuroScience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Wien Center for Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders (R.D.), Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach; and Department of Neurology (R.D.), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
| |
Collapse
|
206
|
Soldan A, Pettigrew C, Fagan AM, Schindler SE, Moghekar A, Fowler C, Li QX, Collins SJ, Carlsson C, Asthana S, Masters CL, Johnson S, Morris JC, Albert M, Gross AL. ATN profiles among cognitively normal individuals and longitudinal cognitive outcomes. Neurology 2019; 92:e1567-e1579. [PMID: 30842300 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the long-term cognitive trajectories of individuals with normal cognition at baseline and distinct amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration (ATN) profiles. METHODS Pooling data across 4 cohort studies, 814 cognitively normal participants (mean baseline age = 59.6 years) were classified into 8 ATN groups using baseline CSF levels of β-amyloid 1-42 as a measure of amyloid (A), phosphorylated tau 181 as a measure of tau (T), and total tau as a measure of neurodegeneration (N). Cognitive performance was measured using a previously validated global factor score and with the Mini-Mental State Examination. We compared the cognitive trajectories across groups using growth curve models (mean follow-up time = 7 years). RESULTS Using different model formulations and cut points for determining biomarker abnormality, only the group with abnormal levels of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (A+T+N+) showed consistently greater cognitive decline than the group with normal levels of all biomarkers (A-T-N-). Replicating prior findings using the 2011 National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association/suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology schema, only individuals with abnormal levels of both amyloid and phosphorylated tau 181 or total tau (stage 2) showed greater cognitive decline than those with normal biomarker levels (stage 0). CONCLUSION The results are consistent with the hypothesis that both elevated brain amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles are necessary to observe accelerated neurodegeneration, which in turn leads to cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Soldan
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Corinne Pettigrew
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Anne M Fagan
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Suzanne E Schindler
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Abhay Moghekar
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christopher Fowler
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Qiao-Xin Li
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Steven J Collins
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cynthia Carlsson
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sanjay Asthana
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Colin L Masters
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sterling Johnson
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - John C Morris
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Marilyn Albert
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alden L Gross
- From the Department of Neurology (A.S., C.P., A.M., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.M.F., S.E.S., J.C.M.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (C.F., Q.-X.L., S.J.C., C.L.M.), the University of Melbourne, Australia; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (C.C., S.A., S.J.), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital and Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison; and Center on Aging and Health and Department of Epidemiology (A.L.G.), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Maestú F, Cuesta P, Hasan O, Fernandéz A, Funke M, Schulz PE. The Importance of the Validation of M/EEG With Current Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13:17. [PMID: 30792632 PMCID: PMC6374629 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Current biomarkers used in research and in clinical practice in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) are the analysis of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) to detect levels of Aβ42 and phosphorylated-tau, amyloid and FDG-PET, and MRI volumetry. Some of these procedures are still invasive for patients or expensive. Electroencephalography (EEG) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) are two non-invasive techniques able to detect the early synaptic dysfunction and track the course of the disease. However, in spite of its added value they are not part of the standard of care in clinical practice in dementia. In this paper we review what these neurophysiological techniques can add to the early diagnosis of AD, whether results in both modalities are related to each other or not, as well as the need of its validation against current biomarkers. We discuss their potential implications for the better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease as well as the need of performing simultaneous M/EEG recordings to better understand discrepancies between these two techniques. Finally, more studies are needed studying M/EEG with amyloid and Tau biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Maestú
- Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Complutense and Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Magnetic Source Imaging Unit, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Pablo Cuesta
- Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Complutense and Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Electrical Engineering and Bioengineering Lab, Department of Industrial Engineering & IUNE Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Omar Hasan
- McGovern Medical School University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alberto Fernandéz
- Laboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Complutense and Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry, and Pathology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael Funke
- Magnetic Source Imaging Unit, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Paul E. Schulz
- McGovern Medical School University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
208
|
Babulal GM, Stout SH, Benzinger TLS, Ott BR, Carr DB, Webb M, Traub CM, Addison A, Morris JC, Warren DK, Roe CM. A Naturalistic Study of Driving Behavior in Older Adults and Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Pilot Study. J Appl Gerontol 2019; 38:277-289. [PMID: 28380718 PMCID: PMC5555816 DOI: 10.1177/0733464817690679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
A clinical consequence of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) is impaired driving performance. However, decline in driving performance may begin in the preclinical stage of AD. We used a naturalistic driving methodology to examine differences in driving behavior over one year in a small sample of cognitively normal older adults with ( n = 10) and without ( n = 10) preclinical AD. As expected with a small sample size, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, but older adults with preclinical AD drove less often, were less likely to drive at night, and had fewer aggressive behaviors such as hard braking, speeding, and sudden acceleration. The sample size required to power a larger study to determine differences was calculated.
Collapse
|
209
|
Sperling RA, Mormino EC, Schultz AP, Betensky RA, Papp KV, Amariglio RE, Hanseeuw BJ, Buckley R, Chhatwal J, Hedden T, Marshall GA, Quiroz YT, Donovan NJ, Jackson J, Gatchel JR, Rabin JS, Jacobs H, Yang HS, Properzi M, Kirn DR, Rentz DM, Johnson KA. The impact of amyloid-beta and tau on prospective cognitive decline in older individuals. Ann Neurol 2019; 85:181-193. [PMID: 30549303 PMCID: PMC6402593 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 12/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau pathologies are commonly observed among clinically normal older individuals at postmortem and can now be detected with in vivo neuroimaging. The association and interaction of these proteinopathies with prospective cognitive decline in normal aging and preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains to be fully elucidated. METHODS One hundred thirty-seven older individuals (age = 76.3 ± 6.22 years) participating in the Harvard Aging Brain Study underwent Aβ (11 C-Pittsburgh compound B) and tau (18 F-flortaucipir) positron emission tomography (PET) with prospective neuropsychological assessments following PET imaging (mean number of cognitive visits = 2.8 ± 1.1). Tau and Aβ PET measures were assessed in regions of interest (ROIs) as well as vertex-wise map analyses. Cognitive change was evaluated with Memory and Executive Function composites. RESULTS Higher levels of Aβ and tau were both associated with greater memory decline, but not with change in executive function. Higher cortical Aβ was associated with higher tau levels in all ROIs, independent of age, and very elevated levels of tau were observed primarily in clinically normal with elevated Aβ. A significant interaction between tau and Aβ was observed in both ROI and map-level analyses, such that rapid prospective memory decline was observed in participants who had high levels of both pathologies. INTERPRETATION Our results are consistent with the supposition that both Aβ and tau are necessary for memory decline in the preclinical stages of AD. These findings may be relevant for disambiguating aging and early cognitive manifestations of AD, and to inform secondary prevention trials in preclinical AD. Ann Neurol 2019;00:1-3 ANN NEUROL 2019;85:181-193.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reisa A Sperling
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth C Mormino
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Neurology, Stanford Medical School, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Aaron P Schultz
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rebecca A Betensky
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Kathryn V Papp
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rebecca E Amariglio
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bernard J Hanseeuw
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel Buckley
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jasmeer Chhatwal
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Trey Hedden
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gad A Marshall
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yakeel T Quiroz
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy J Donovan
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan Jackson
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer R Gatchel
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA
| | - Jennifer S Rabin
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Heidi Jacobs
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Hyun-Sik Yang
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Properzi
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Dylan R Kirn
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Dorene M Rentz
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Keith A Johnson
- Harvard Aging Brain Study, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Ding N, Jiang J, Xu A, Tang Y, Li Z. Manual Acupuncture Regulates Behavior and Cerebral Blood Flow in the SAMP8 Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:37. [PMID: 30766475 PMCID: PMC6365452 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that cerebrovascular function abnormality plays a key role in occurrence and worsening of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is a sensitive marker to early perfusion deficiencies in AD. As one of the most important therapies in complementary and alternative medicine, manual acupuncture (MA) has been used in the treatment of AD. However, the moderating effect of MA on CBF remains largely unknown. Objective: To investigate the effect of MA on the behavior and CBF of SAMP8 mice. Methods: SAMP8 mice were randomly divided into the AD, MA, and medicine (M) groups, with SAMR1 mice used as the normal control (N) group. Mice in the M group were treated with donepezil hydrochloride at 0.65 μg/g. In the MA group, MA was applied at Baihui (GV20) and Yintang (GV29) for 20 min. The above treatments were administered once a day for 15 consecutive days. The Morris water maze and arterial spin labeling MRI were used to assess spatial learning and memory in behavior and CBF respectively. Results: Compared with the AD group, both MA and donepezil significantly decreased the escape latency (p < 0.01), while also elevating platform crossover number and the percentage of time and swimming distance in the platform quadrant (p < 0.01 or p < 0.05). The remarkable improvement in escape latency in the MA group appeared earlier than the M group, and no significant statistical significance was observed between the N and MA group with the exception of days 5 and 10. The CBF in the prefrontal lobe and hippocampus in the MA group was substantially higher than in the AD group (p < 0.05) with the exception of the right prefrontal lobe, with similar effects of donepezil. Conclusion: Manual acupuncture can effectively improve the spatial learning, relearning and memory abilities of SAMP8 mice. The increase in CBF in the prefrontal lobe and hippocampus could be an important mechanism for the beneficial cognitive effects of MA in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Ding
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Jiang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Anping Xu
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yinshan Tang
- Department of Rehabilitation in Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhigang Li
- School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
211
|
Thomas S, Ajroud-Driss S, Dimachkie MM, Gibbons C, Freeman R, Simpson DM, Singleton JR, Smith AG, Höke A. Peripheral Neuropathy Research Registry: A prospective cohort. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2019; 24:39-47. [PMID: 30629307 DOI: 10.1111/jns.12301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Revised: 12/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The Peripheral Neuropathy Research Registry (PNRR) is a prospective cohort of peripheral neuropathy (PN) patients focused on idiopathic axonal peripheral neuropathy. Patients with diabetic, human immunodeficiency virus-, and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies are enrolled as comparison groups. The PNRR is a multi-center collaboration initiated and funded by the Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy (FPN) with the objective to recruit a well characterized cohort of patients with different phenotypes and symptoms in each diagnostic category, and to advance research through development of biomarkers and identification of previously unknown causes of PN. The overall goal of the initiative is to find disease-altering treatments and better symptom relief for patients. We present the study design, types of data collected, and characteristics of the first 1150 patients enrolled. We also discuss ongoing analyses on this dataset, including untargeted-omics methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Mazen M Dimachkie
- Department of Neurology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
| | - Christopher Gibbons
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Roy Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David M Simpson
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | | | - A Gordon Smith
- Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University
| | | | - Ahmet Höke
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Parnetti L, Chipi E, Salvadori N, D'Andrea K, Eusebi P. Prevalence and risk of progression of preclinical Alzheimer's disease stages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2019; 11:7. [PMID: 30646955 PMCID: PMC6334406 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0459-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology begins several years before the clinical onset. The long preclinical phase is composed of three stages according to the 2011National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) criteria, followed by mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a featured clinical entity defined as “due to AD”, or “prodromal AD”, when pathophysiological biomarkers (i.e., cerebrospinal fluid or positron emission tomography with amyloid tracer) are positive. In the clinical setting, there is a clear need to detect the earliest symptoms not yet fulfilling MCI criteria, in order to proceed to biomarker assessment for diagnostic definition, thus offering treatment with disease-modifying drugs to patients as early as possible. According to the available evidence, we thus estimated the prevalence and risk of progression at each preclinical AD stage, with special interest in Stage 3. Methods Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies published from April 2008 to May 2018 were obtained through MEDLINE-PubMed, screened, and systematically reviewed by four independent reviewers. Data from included studies were meta-analyzed using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. Results Estimated overall prevalence of preclinical AD was 22% (95% CI = 18–26%). Rate of biomarker positivity overlapped in cognitively normal individuals and people with subjective cognitive decline. The risk of progression increases across preclinical AD stages, with individuals classified as NIA-AA Stage 3 showing the highest risk (73%, 95% CI = 40–92%) compared to those in Stage 2 (38%, 95% CI = 21–59%) and Stage 1 (20%, 95% CI = 10–34%). Conclusion Available data consistently show that risk of progression increases across the preclinical AD stages, where Stage 3 shows a risk of progression comparable to MCI due to AD. Accordingly, an effort should be made to also operationalize the diagnostic work-up in subjects with subtle cognitive deficits not yet fulfilling MCI criteria. The possibility to define, in the clinical routine, a patient as “pre-MCI due to AD” could offer these subjects the opportunity to use disease-modifying drugs at best. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0459-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucilla Parnetti
- Centre for Memory Disturbances, Lab of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Elena Chipi
- Centre for Memory Disturbances, Lab of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Nicola Salvadori
- Centre for Memory Disturbances, Lab of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Katia D'Andrea
- Centre for Memory Disturbances, Lab of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paolo Eusebi
- Centre for Memory Disturbances, Lab of Clinical Neurochemistry, Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
James BD, Bennett DA. Causes and Patterns of Dementia: An Update in the Era of Redefining Alzheimer's Disease. Annu Rev Public Health 2019; 40:65-84. [PMID: 30642228 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The burden of dementia continues to increase as the population ages, with no disease-modifying treatments available. However, dementia risk appears to be decreasing, and progress has been made in understanding its multifactorial etiology. The 2018 National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) research framework for Alzheimer's disease (AD) defines AD as a biological process measured by brain pathology or biomarkers, spanning the cognitive spectrum from normality to dementia. This framework facilitates interventions in the asymptomatic space and accommodates knowledge that many additional pathologies (e.g., cerebrovascular) contribute to the Alzheimer's dementia syndrome. The framework has implications for how we think about risk factors for "AD": Many commonly accepted risk factors are not related to AD pathology and would no longer be considered risk factors for AD. They may instead be related to other pathologies or resilience to pathology. This review updates what is known about causes, risk factors, and changing patterns of dementia, addressing whether they are related to AD pathology/biomarkers, other pathologies, or resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan D James
- Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA; .,Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA
| | - David A Bennett
- Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA; .,Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
214
|
Complement protein levels in plasma astrocyte-derived exosomes are abnormal in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: DIAGNOSIS, ASSESSMENT & DISEASE MONITORING 2019; 11:61-66. [PMID: 31032394 PMCID: PMC6477776 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Levels of complement proteins (CPs) in plasma astrocyte-derived exosomes (ADEs) that are abnormal in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have not been assessed in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods Participants (n = 20 per group) had either MCI converting to dementia within 3 years (MCIC), MCI remaining stable over 3 years (MCIS), Alzheimer's disease, or were controls. CPs of ADEs isolated from plasmas by anti-human glutamine aspartate transporter antibody absorption were quantified by ELISAs. Results ADE levels of C1q and C4b of the classical pathway, factor D and fragment Bb of the alternative pathway, and C5b, C3b, and C5b-C9 of both pathways were significantly higher in patients with MCIC than those with MCIS. ADE levels of inhibitory CPs decay-accelerating factor, CD46, CD59, and type 1 complement receptor were significantly lower in patients with MCIC than those with MCIS. Discussion ADE CPs are components of neurotoxic neuroinflammation that may be predictive biomarkers of MCI conversion to Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
|
215
|
Panza F, Lozupone M, Logroscino G, Imbimbo BP. A critical appraisal of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2019; 15:73-88. [DOI: 10.1038/s41582-018-0116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 459] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
216
|
Petersen RC, Lundt ES, Therneau TM, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Mielke MM, Roberts RO, Lowe VJ, Machulda MM, Kremers WK, Geda YE, Jack CR. Predicting Progression to Mild Cognitive Impairment. Ann Neurol 2019; 85:155-160. [PMID: 30521086 PMCID: PMC6504922 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Despite much attention to the use of biomarkers for predicting Alzheimer disease, little information is available at the individual level. We used the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging to estimate absolute risk of cognitive impairment by biomarker group. Risk increased with age and any biomarker abnormality. For example, a 75-year-old with abnormal amyloid and cortical thinning biomarkers has about a 20% chance of cognitive impairment by age 80 years, whereas with normal biomarkers the chance is <10%. Persons with only one abnormal biomarker had similar intermediate risks. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:155-160.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald C. Petersen
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Emily S. Lundt
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Terry M. Therneau
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Val J. Lowe
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mary M. Machulda
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Walter K. Kremers
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yonas E. Geda
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
217
|
Gallardo G, Holtzman DM. Amyloid-β and Tau at the Crossroads of Alzheimer's Disease. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2019; 1184:187-203. [PMID: 32096039 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia characterized neuropathologically by senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Early breakthroughs in AD research led to the discovery of amyloid-β as the major component of senile plaques and tau protein as the major component of NFTs. Shortly following the identification of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide was the discovery that a genetic mutation in the amyloid precursor protein (APP), a type1 transmembrane protein, can be a cause of autosomal dominant familial AD (fAD). These discoveries, coupled with other breakthroughs in cell biology and human genetics, have led to a theory known as the "amyloid hypothesis", which postulates that amyloid-β is the predominant driving factor in AD development. Nonetheless, more recent advances in imaging analysis, biomarkers and mouse models are now redefining this original hypothesis, as it is likely amyloid-β, tau and other pathophysiological mechanism such as inflammation, come together at a crossroads that ultimately leads to the development of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilbert Gallardo
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David M Holtzman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. .,Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. .,Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
Ishii M, Kamel H, Iadecola C. Retinol Binding Protein 4 Levels Are Not Altered in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease and Not Associated with Cognitive Decline or Incident Dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2019; 67:257-263. [PMID: 30562901 PMCID: PMC6385158 DOI: 10.3233/jad-180682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that disparate pathways from systemic metabolism to retinoic acid/vitamin A signaling can contribute to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathobiology. Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) is an adipocyte-secreted hormone (adipokine) that regulates insulin signaling and is also a key transporter of retinoic acid and its derivatives. While earlier studies found alterations in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of RBP4 in later stages of AD, it is not known if circulating RBP4 is altered in preclinical AD or if it can be a useful biomarker for cognitive decline and dementia. In this study, we used ELISA to measure plasma RBP4 levels in cognitively normal individuals (Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR 0). Subjects with preclinical AD were identified by previously established CSF criteria (preclinical AD: 20 men, 18 women; control: 45 men, 73 women). Plasma RBP4 levels were similar between preclinical AD and control subjects in men (preclinical AD: 30.0±7.4 μg/mL; control: 30.0±8.7 μg/mL; p = 0.97) and women (preclinical AD 30.9±7.9 μg/mL; control: 31.7±8.5 μg/mL; p = 0.72). Additionally, RBP4 levels were not related to body mass index or CSF AD biomarkers levels of amyloid-β42, tau, or phosphorylated tau. Baseline plasma RBP4 levels were not associated with the incidence of CDR ≥0.5, all-cause dementia, or AD diagnosis. Collectively, these results do not support peripheral RBP4 as a clinical biomarker or therapeutic target in the early stages of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Ishii
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute and Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hooman Kamel
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute and Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Costantino Iadecola
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute and Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
219
|
Thirunavu V, McCullough A, Su Y, Flores S, Dincer A, Morris JC, Cruchaga C, Benzinger TL, Gordon BA. Higher Body Mass Index Is Associated with Lower Cortical Amyloid-β Burden in Cognitively Normal Individuals in Late-Life. J Alzheimers Dis 2019; 69:817-827. [PMID: 31156169 PMCID: PMC7047466 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both low and high body mass index (BMI) have been associated with an increased risk of dementia, including that caused by Alzheimer's disease (AD). Specifically, high middle-age BMI or a low late-age BMI has been considered a predictor for the development of AD dementia. Less studied is the relationship between BMI and AD pathology. OBJECTIVE We explored the association between BMI and cortical amyloid-β (Aβ) burden in cognitively normal participants that were either in mid-life (45-60 years) or late-life (>60). METHODS We analyzed cross-sectional baseline data from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (ADRC) at Washington University. Aβ pathology was measured in 373 individuals with Aβ PET imaging and was quantified using Centiloid units. We split the cohort into mid- and late-life groups for analyses (n = 96 and n = 277, respectively). We ran general linear regression models to predict Aβ levels from BMI while controlling for age, sex, years of education, and APOE4 status. Analyses were also conducted to test the interaction between BMI and APOE4 genotype and between BMI and sex. RESULTS Higher BMI was associated with lower cortical Aβ burden in late-life (β= -0.81, p = 0.0066), but no relationship was found in mid-life (β= 0.04, p > 0.5). The BMI×APOE4+ and BMI×male interaction terms were not significant in the mid-life (β= 0.28, p = 0.41; β= 0.64, p = 0.13) or the late-life (β= 0.17, p > 0.5; β= 0.50, p = 0.43) groups. CONCLUSION Higher late-life BMI is associated with lower cortical Aβ burden in cognitively normal individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Austin McCullough
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yi Su
- Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Shaney Flores
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Aylin Dincer
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John C. Morris
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Carlos Cruchaga
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tammie L.S. Benzinger
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Brian A. Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
220
|
Li H, Liu CC, Zheng H, Huang TY. Amyloid, tau, pathogen infection and antimicrobial protection in Alzheimer's disease -conformist, nonconformist, and realistic prospects for AD pathogenesis. Transl Neurodegener 2018; 7:34. [PMID: 30603085 PMCID: PMC6306008 DOI: 10.1186/s40035-018-0139-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a fatal disease that threatens the quality of life of an aging population at a global scale. Various hypotheses on the etiology of AD have been developed over the years to guide efforts in search of therapeutic strategies. MAIN BODY In this review, we focus on four AD hypotheses currently relevant to AD onset: the prevailing amyloid cascade hypothesis, the well-recognized tau hypothesis, the increasingly popular pathogen (viral infection) hypothesis, and the infection-related antimicrobial protection hypothesis. In briefly reviewing the main evidence supporting each hypothesis and discussing the questions that need to be addressed, we hope to gain a better understanding of the complicated multi-layered interactions in potential causal and/or risk factors in AD pathogenesis. As a defining feature of AD, the existence of amyloid deposits is likely fundamental to AD onset but is insufficient to wholly reproduce many complexities of the disorder. A similar belief is currently also applied to hyperphosphorylated tau aggregates within neurons, where tau has been postulated to drive neurodegeneration in the presence of pre-existing Aβ plaques in the brain. Although infection of the central nerve system by pathogens such as viruses may increase AD risk, it is yet to be determined whether this phenomenon is applicable to all cases of sporadic AD and whether it is a primary trigger for AD onset. Lastly, the antimicrobial protection hypothesis provides insight into a potential physiological role for Aβ peptides, but how Aβ/microbial interactions affect AD pathogenesis during aging awaits further validation. Nevertheless, this hypothesis cautions potential adverse effects in Aβ-targeting therapies by hindering potential roles for Aβ in anti-viral protection. CONCLUSION AD is a multi-factor complex disorder, which likely requires a combinatorial therapeutic approach to successfully slow or reduce symptomatic memory decline. A better understanding of how various causal and/or risk factors affecting disease onset and progression will enhance the likelihood of conceiving effective treatment paradigms, which may involve personalized treatment strategies for individual patients at varying stages of disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongmei Li
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL USA
| | - Chia-Chen Liu
- Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL USA
| | - Hui Zheng
- Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Timothy Y. Huang
- Neuroscience Initiative, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, San Diego, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Cohen AD, Landau SM, Snitz BE, Klunk WE, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Fluid and PET biomarkers for amyloid pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Cell Neurosci 2018; 97:3-17. [PMID: 30537535 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid plaques and tau pathology (neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads). Amyloid plaques are primarily composed of aggregated and oligomeric β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides ending at position 42 (Aβ42). The development of fluid and PET biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD), has allowed for detection of Aβ pathology in vivo and marks a major advancement in understanding the role of Aβ in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the recent National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) Research Framework, AD is defined by the underlying pathology as measured in patients during life by biomarkers (Jack et al., 2018), while clinical symptoms are used for staging of the disease. Therefore, sensitive, specific and robust biomarkers to identify brain amyloidosis are central in AD research. Here, we discuss fluid and PET biomarkers for Aβ and their application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann D Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States of America.
| | - Susan M Landau
- Neurology Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Functional Imaging Department, Life Sciences Division, United States of America
| | - Beth E Snitz
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - William E Klunk
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Molndal, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, University College, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Molndal, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, University College, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Department of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Roe CM, Ances BM, Head D, Babulal GM, Stout SH, Grant EA, Hassenstab J, Xiong C, Holtzman DM, Benzinger TLS, Schindler SE, Fagan AM, Morris JC. Incident cognitive impairment: longitudinal changes in molecular, structural and cognitive biomarkers. Brain 2018; 141:3233-3248. [PMID: 30304397 PMCID: PMC6202574 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Longer periods are needed to examine how biomarker changes occur relative to incident sporadic cognitive impairment. We evaluated molecular (CSF and imaging), structural, and cognitive biomarkers to predict incident cognitive impairment and examined longitudinal biomarker changes before and after symptomatic onset. Data from participants who were cognitively normal, underwent amyloid imaging using Pittsburgh compound B and/or CSF studies, and at least two clinical assessments were used. Stepwise Cox proportional hazards models tested associations of molecular (Pittsburgh compound B; CSF amyloid-β42, tau, ptau181, tau/amyloid-β42, ptau181/amyloid-β42), structural (normalized hippocampal volume, normalized whole brain volume), and cognitive (Animal Naming, Trail Making A, Trail Making B, Selective Reminding Test - Free Recall) biomarkers with time to Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) > 0. Cognitively normal participants (n = 664), aged 42 to 90 years (mean ± standard deviation = 71.4 ± 9.2) were followed for up to 16.9 years (mean ± standard deviation = 6.2 ± 3.5 years). Of these, 145 (21.8%) participants developed a CDR > 0. At time of incident cognitive impairment, molecular, structural, and cognitive markers were abnormal for CDR > 0 compared to CDR = 0. Linear mixed models indicated rates of change in molecular biomarkers were similar for CDR = 0 and CDR > 0, suggesting that the separation in values between CDR = 0 and CDR > 0 must have occurred prior to the observation period. Rate of decline for structural and cognitive biomarkers was faster for CDR > 0 compared to CDR = 0 (P < 0.0001). Structural and cognitive biomarkers for CDR > 0 diverged from CDR 0 at 9 and 12 years before incident cognitive impairment, respectively. Within those who developed CDR > 0, a natural separation occurred for Pittsburgh compound B values. In particular, CDR > 0 who had at least one APOE ɛ4 allele had higher, and more rapid increase in Pittsburgh compound B, while APOE ɛ2 was observed to have slower increases in Pittsburgh compound B. Of molecular biomarker-positive participants followed for at least 10 years (n = 16-23), ∼70% remained CDR = 0 over the follow-up period. In conclusion, conversion from cognitively normal to CDR > 0 is characterized by not only the magnitude of molecular biomarkers but also rate of change in cognitive and structural biomarkers. Findings support theoretical models of biomarker changes seen during transition to cognitive impairment using longitudinal data and provide a potential time for changes seen during this transition. These findings support the use of molecular biomarkers for trial inclusion and cognitive/structural biomarkers for evaluating trial outcomes. Finally, results support a potential role for APOE ɛ in modulating amyloid accumulation in CDR > 0 with APOE ɛ4 being deleterious and APOE ɛ2 protective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M Roe
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Beau M Ances
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- The Hope Center for Neurological Disorders; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Denise Head
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- The Hope Center for Neurological Disorders; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ganesh M Babulal
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah H Stout
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Grant
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- The Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jason Hassenstab
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chengjie Xiong
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- The Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David M Holtzman
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- The Hope Center for Neurological Disorders; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tammie L S Benzinger
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Suzanne E Schindler
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Anne M Fagan
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
ten Kate M, Ingala S, Schwarz AJ, Fox NC, Chételat G, van Berckel BNM, Ewers M, Foley C, Gispert JD, Hill D, Irizarry MC, Lammertsma AA, Molinuevo JL, Ritchie C, Scheltens P, Schmidt ME, Visser PJ, Waldman A, Wardlaw J, Haller S, Barkhof F. Secondary prevention of Alzheimer's dementia: neuroimaging contributions. Alzheimers Res Ther 2018; 10:112. [PMID: 30376881 PMCID: PMC6208183 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0438-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Alzheimer's disease (AD), pathological changes may arise up to 20 years before the onset of dementia. This pre-dementia window provides a unique opportunity for secondary prevention. However, exposing non-demented subjects to putative therapies requires reliable biomarkers for subject selection, stratification, and monitoring of treatment. Neuroimaging allows the detection of early pathological changes, and longitudinal imaging can assess the effect of interventions on markers of molecular pathology and rates of neurodegeneration. This is of particular importance in pre-dementia AD trials, where clinical outcomes have a limited ability to detect treatment effects within the typical time frame of a clinical trial. We review available evidence for the use of neuroimaging in clinical trials in pre-dementia AD. We appraise currently available imaging markers for subject selection, stratification, outcome measures, and safety in the context of such populations. MAIN BODY Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is a validated in-vivo marker of fibrillar amyloid plaques. It is appropriate for inclusion in trials targeting the amyloid pathway, as well as to monitor treatment target engagement. Amyloid PET, however, has limited ability to stage the disease and does not perform well as a prognostic marker within the time frame of a pre-dementia AD trial. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), providing markers of neurodegeneration, can improve the identification of subjects at risk of imminent decline and hence play a role in subject inclusion. Atrophy rates (either hippocampal or whole brain), which can be reliably derived from structural MRI, are useful in tracking disease progression and have the potential to serve as outcome measures. MRI can also be used to assess comorbid vascular pathology and define homogeneous groups for inclusion or for subject stratification. Finally, MRI also plays an important role in trial safety monitoring, particularly the identification of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Tau PET to measure neurofibrillary tangle burden is currently under development. Evidence to support the use of advanced MRI markers such as resting-state functional MRI, arterial spin labelling, and diffusion tensor imaging in pre-dementia AD is preliminary and requires further validation. CONCLUSION We propose a strategy for longitudinal imaging to track early signs of AD including quantitative amyloid PET and yearly multiparametric MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara ten Kate
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7056, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Silvia Ingala
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adam J. Schwarz
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals Comparny, Cambridge, MA USA
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana USA
| | - Nick C. Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Gaël Chételat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Inserm UMR-S U1237, Université de Caen-Normandie, GIP Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Ewers
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Adriaan A. Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Craig Ritchie
- Centre for Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7056, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7056, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adam Waldman
- Centre for Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanna Wardlaw
- Centre for Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sven Haller
- Affidea Centre de Diagnostic Radiologique de Carouge, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Insititutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
224
|
Hashemi M, Jervekani ZT, Mortazavi S, Maracy MR, Barekatain M. Association between cognitive function and parameters of echocardiography and coronary artery angiography. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2018; 76:225-230. [PMID: 29742250 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20180026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to determine whether there is an association between cognition and the results of echocardiography and angiography, based on neuropsychological assessments. METHODS We assessed the cognition of 85 patients who had recently undergone coronary artery angiography. We calculated the Gensini score for the coronary artery disease index. We also performed echocardiography to find indices of cardiac functioning. RESULTS The lower left ventricular ejection fraction correlated with lower scores on visuospatial, executive function, processing speed/attention and verbal memory capacities (p ≤ 0.05). A higher Gensini score and left atrial size correlated with lower executive function and processing speed/attention (p ≤ 0.05). In the group of patients with an impaired cognitive state, higher Gensini scores correlated with decreased processing speed/attention (p = 0.01) and the e' index was associated with lower capacity of executive function (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION Decreased processing speed/attention and executive function may correlate with cardiac dysfunction and coronary artery disease. The Color Trail Test may be considered for simple screening for cognitive problems in elderly patients with coronary artery disease or diastolic dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hashemi
- Cardiovascular Department, Interventional Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Zahra Teimouri Jervekani
- Cardiovascular Department, Heart Failure Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Shahrzad Mortazavi
- Psychiatry Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Maracy
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Majid Barekatain
- Psychiatry Department, Psychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
225
|
Verberk IMW, Slot RE, Verfaillie SCJ, Heijst H, Prins ND, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, Teunissen CE, van der Flier WM. Plasma Amyloid as Prescreener for the Earliest Alzheimer Pathological Changes. Ann Neurol 2018; 84:648-658. [PMID: 30196548 PMCID: PMC6282982 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective We investigated the association of plasma amyloid beta (Abeta)40, Abeta42, and total tau (tTau) with the presence of Alzheimer pathological changes in cognitively normal individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Methods We included 248 subjects with SCD (61 ± 9 years, 42% female, Mini‐Mental State Examination = 28 ± 2) from the SCIENCe project and Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. Subjects were dichotomized as amyloid abnormal by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET). Baseline plasma Abeta40, Abeta42, and tTau were measured using Simoa technology. Associations between plasma levels and amyloid status were assessed using logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Association of plasma levels with risk of clinical progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Results Fifty‐seven (23%) subjects were CSF‐amyloid abnormal. Plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio and plasma Abeta42 alone, but not tTau, identified abnormal CSF‐amyloid status (plasma ratio: area under the curve [AUC] = 77%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 69–84%; plasma Abeta42: AUC = 66%, 95% CI: 58–74%). Combining plasma ratio with age and apolipoprotein E resulted in AUC = 83% (95% CI = 77–89%). The Youden cutoff of the plasma ratio gave a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 75%, and applying this as a prescreener would reduce the number of lumbar punctures by 51%. Using PET as outcome, a comparable reduction in number of PET scans would be achieved when applying the plasma ratio as prescreener. In addition, low plasma ratio was associated with clinical progression to MCI or dementia (hazard ratio = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.4–2.3). Interpretation Plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio has potential as a prescreener to identify Alzheimer pathological changes in cognitively normal individuals with SCD. Ann Neurol 2018;84:656–666
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge M. W. Verberk
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of NeurologyVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical ChemistryVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Rosalinde E. Slot
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of NeurologyVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Sander C. J. Verfaillie
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of NeurologyVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Hans Heijst
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical ChemistryVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Niels D. Prins
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of NeurologyVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of NeurologyVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical ChemistryVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Amsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of NeurologyVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsVU University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
Kunst J, Marecek R, Klobusiakova P, Balazova Z, Anderkova L, Nemcova-Elfmarkova N, Rektorova I. Patterns of Grey Matter Atrophy at Different Stages of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Diseases and Relation to Cognition. Brain Topogr 2018; 32:142-160. [PMID: 30206799 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-018-0675-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Using MRI, a characteristic pattern of grey matter (GM) atrophy has been described in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD); GM patterns at different stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) have been inconclusive. Few studies have directly compared structural changes in groups with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) caused by different pathologies (AD, PD). We used several analytical methods to determine GM changes at different stages of both PD and AD. We also evaluated associations between GM changes and cognitive measurements. Altogether 144 subjects were evaluated: PD with normal cognition (PD-NC; n = 23), PD with MCI (PD-MCI; n = 24), amnestic MCI (aMCI; n = 27), AD (n = 12), and age-matched healthy controls (HC; n = 58). All subjects underwent structural MRI and cognitive examination. GM volumes were analysed using two different techniques: voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and source-based morphometry (SBM), which is a multivariate method. In addition, cortical thickness (CT) was evaluated to assess between-group differences in GM. The cognitive domain z-scores were correlated with GM changes in individual patient groups. GM atrophy in the anterior and posterior cingulate, as measured by VBM, in the temporo-fronto-parietal component, as measured by SBM, and in the posterior cortical regions as well as in the anterior cingulate and frontal region, as measured by CT, differentiated aMCI from HC. Major hippocampal and temporal lobe atrophy (VBM, SBM) and to some extent occipital atrophy (SBM) differentiated AD from aMCI and from HC. Correlations with cognitive deficits were present only in the AD group. PD-MCI showed greater GM atrophy than PD-NC in the orbitofrontal regions (VBM), which was related to memory z-scores, and in the left superior parietal lobule (CT); more widespread limbic and fronto-parieto-occipital neocortical atrophy (all methods) differentiated this group from HC. Only CT revealed subtle GM atrophy in the anterior cingulate, precuneus, and temporal neocortex in PD-NC as compared to HC. None of the methods differentiated PD-MCI from aMCI. Both MCI groups showed distinct limbic and fronto-temporo-parietal neocortical atrophy compared to HC with no specific between-group differences. AD subjects displayed a typical pattern of major temporal lobe atrophy which was associated with deficits in all cognitive domains. VBM and CT were more sensitive than SBM in identifying frontal and posterior cortical atrophy in PD-MCI as compared to PD-NC. Our data support the notion that the results of studies using different analytical methods cannot be compared directly. Only CT measures revealed some subtle differences between HC and PD-NC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Kunst
- Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Brain and Mind Research Programme, CEITEC Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Radek Marecek
- Brain and Mind Research Programme, CEITEC Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Patricia Klobusiakova
- Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Brain and Mind Research Programme, CEITEC Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Zuzana Balazova
- Brain and Mind Research Programme, CEITEC Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lubomira Anderkova
- Brain and Mind Research Programme, CEITEC Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Irena Rektorova
- Brain and Mind Research Programme, CEITEC Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. .,Movement Disorders Centre, First Department of Neurology, St Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Pekarska 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Widespread distribution of tauopathy in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2018; 72:177-185. [PMID: 30292840 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the distribution and severity of tau-PET binding in cognitively normal adults with preclinical Alzheimer's disease as determined by positive beta-amyloid PET. 18F-AV-1451 tau-PET data from 109 cognitively normal older adults were processed with 34 cortical and 9 subcortical FreeSurfer regions and averaged across both hemispheres. Individuals were classified as being beta-amyloid positive (N = 25, A+) or negative (N = 84, A-) based on a 18F-AV-45 beta-amyloid-PET standardized uptake value ratio of 1.22. We compared the tau-PET binding in the 2 groups using covariate-adjusted linear regressions. The A+ cohort had higher tau-PET binding within 8 regions: precuneus, amygdala, banks of the superior temporal sulcus, entorhinal cortex, fusiform gyrus, inferior parietal cortex, inferior temporal cortex, and middle temporal cortex. These findings, consistent with preclinical involvement of the medial temporal lobe and parietal lobe and association regions by tauopathy, emphasize that therapies targeting tauopathy in Alzheimer's disease could be considered before the onset of symptoms to prevent or ameliorate cognitive decline.
Collapse
|
228
|
Guedes JR, Lao T, Cardoso AL, El Khoury J. Roles of Microglial and Monocyte Chemokines and Their Receptors in Regulating Alzheimer's Disease-Associated Amyloid-β and Tau Pathologies. Front Neurol 2018; 9:549. [PMID: 30158892 PMCID: PMC6104478 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemokines and their receptors have been shown to affect amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau pathologies in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by regulating microglia and monocyte-associated neuroinflammation, microglial movement and monocyte recruitment into the brain. These cells in turn can promote and mediate Aβ phagocytosis and degradation and tau phosphorylation. In this review we discuss published work in this field in mouse models of AD and review what is known about the contributions of microglial and monocyte chemokines and their receptors to amyloid and tau pathologies. We focus on the roles of the chemokine/chemokine receptor pairs CCL2/CCR2, CX3CL1/CX3CR1, CCL5/CCR5, CXCL10/CXCR3 and CXCL1/CXCR2, highlighting important knowledge gaps in this field. A full understanding of the functions of chemokines and their receptors in AD may guide the development of novel immunotherapies for this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana R Guedes
- Doctoral Programme in Experimental Biology and Biomedicine, CNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,CNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Taotao Lao
- Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Ana L Cardoso
- CNC - Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joseph El Khoury
- Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Tang M, Pi J, Long Y, Huang N, Cheng Y, Zheng H. Quantum dots-based sandwich immunoassay for sensitive detection of Alzheimer's disease-related Aβ 1-42. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA. PART A, MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY 2018; 201:82-87. [PMID: 29734108 DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2018.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Amyloid-beta peptide 1-42 (Aβ1-42) is known as a component of amyloid plaques in association with Alzheimer's disease. Herein, we developed a reliable and remarkably sensitive sandwich immunoassay to detect the Aβ1-42 using quantum dots (QDs) as fluorescent label. In the presence of Aβ1-42, the biotinylated Anti-beta Amyloid 1-16 (N-Ab) recognized the target and formed C-Ab-Aβ1-42-N-Ab sandwich immunocomplexes. Then Streptavidin-QDs conjugated to biotinylated N-Ab and the concentration of Aβ1-42 was determined by detecting the fluorescence intensity in the supernatant. This method is faster and more efficient than the previous approach we reported. It also has reasonable sensitivity and selectivity. Under the optimized conditions, the linear range is 5.0 to 100 pM (0.023-0.45 ng/mL) and the detection limit is 1.7 pM (7.6 pg/ mL). In addition, this method has been successfully applied to detect the Aβ1-42 in human cerebrospinal fluid sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menghuan Tang
- Key Laboratory of Luminescent and Real-Time Analytical Chemistry (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China
| | - Jiangli Pi
- Key Laboratory of Luminescent and Real-Time Analytical Chemistry (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China
| | - Yijuan Long
- Key Laboratory of Luminescent and Real-Time Analytical Chemistry (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China
| | - Ning Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, PR China
| | - Yuan Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, PR China
| | - Huzhi Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Luminescent and Real-Time Analytical Chemistry (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
230
|
Konijnenberg E, Carter SF, Ten Kate M, den Braber A, Tomassen J, Amadi C, Wesselman L, Nguyen HT, van de Kreeke JA, Yaqub M, Demuru M, Mulder SD, Hillebrand A, Bouwman FH, Teunissen CE, Serné EH, Moll AC, Verbraak FD, Hinz R, Pendleton N, Lammertsma AA, van Berckel BNM, Barkhof F, Boomsma DI, Scheltens P, Herholz K, Visser PJ. The EMIF-AD PreclinAD study: study design and baseline cohort overview. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2018; 10:75. [PMID: 30075734 PMCID: PMC6091034 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0406-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Amyloid pathology is the pathological hallmark in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and can precede clinical dementia by decades. So far it remains unclear how amyloid pathology leads to cognitive impairment and dementia. To design AD prevention trials it is key to include cognitively normal subjects at high risk for amyloid pathology and to find predictors of cognitive decline in these subjects. These goals can be accomplished by targeting twins, with additional benefits to identify genetic and environmental pathways for amyloid pathology, other AD biomarkers, and cognitive decline. Methods From December 2014 to October 2017 we enrolled cognitively normal participants aged 60 years and older from the ongoing Manchester and Newcastle Age and Cognitive Performance Research Cohort and the Netherlands Twins Register. In Manchester we included single individuals, and in Amsterdam monozygotic twin pairs. At baseline, participants completed neuropsychological tests and questionnaires, and underwent physical examination, blood sampling, ultrasound of the carotid arteries, structural and resting state functional brain magnetic resonance imaging, and dynamic amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scanning with [18F]flutemetamol. In addition, the twin cohort underwent lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid collection, buccal cell collection, magnetoencephalography, optical coherence tomography, and retinal imaging. Results We included 285 participants, who were on average 74.8 ± 9.7 years old, 64% female. Fifty-eight participants (22%) had an abnormal amyloid PET scan. Conclusions A rich baseline dataset of cognitively normal elderly individuals has been established to estimate risk factors and biomarkers for amyloid pathology and future cognitive decline. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0406-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elles Konijnenberg
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Stephen F Carter
- Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mara Ten Kate
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biological Psychology, VU University, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chinenye Amadi
- Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Wesselman
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hoang-Ton Nguyen
- Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacoba A van de Kreeke
- Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matteo Demuru
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra D Mulder
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Hillebrand
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke H Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik H Serné
- Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annette C Moll
- Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank D Verbraak
- Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rainer Hinz
- Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Neil Pendleton
- Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Dorret I Boomsma
- Department of Biological Psychology, VU University, Neuroscience Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karl Herholz
- Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study investigated the independent and synergistic effects of amyloid beta (Aβ1-42) and phosphorylated tau (Ptau) pathologies on neuropsychological profiles and trajectories in cognitively normal older adults. METHODS Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants identified as cognitively normal at baseline underwent longitudinal assessment (N=518; 0, 12, 24, 36 months), baseline lumbar puncture and follow-up cognitive exams. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) biomarker profiles (Aβ-Ptau-, Aβ+Ptau-, Aβ-Ptau+, Aβ+Ptau+) were compared on baseline profiles and trajectories for memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test), attention/executive function (Trail Making Test, A and B), language (Animal Fluency, Vegetable Fluency, Boston Naming Test) and processing speed (Digit Symbol) using multilevel models. RESULTS The Aβ+Ptau+ group exhibited significantly worse baseline performance on tests of memory and executive function relative to the Aβ-Ptau+ and Aβ-Ptau- groups. The Aβ+Ptau- group fell between the Aβ+Ptau+ participants and the Aβ-Ptau- and Aβ-Ptau+ groups on all three cognitive domains and exhibited worse baseline executive function. The Aβ-Ptau+ group performed worse than Aβ-Ptau- participants on processing speed. Over 36-month follow-up, the Aβ+Ptau+ group exhibited the greatest declines in memory and semantic fluency compared to all other groups. CONCLUSIONS Cognitively normal older adults with both Aβ and Ptau pathology exhibited the weakest profile, marked by the worst memory decline compared to the other groups. Other subtle changes in this group included declines in executive function and semantic fluency. Those with Ptau pathology alone showed slowed processing speed, and those with Aβ pathology alone showed worse attention and executive function compared to biomarker negative participants. (JINS, 2018, 24, 693-702).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean K. Ho
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel A. Nation
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
232
|
de Wilde A, van Buchem MM, Otten RHJ, Bouwman F, Stephens A, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM. Disclosure of amyloid positron emission tomography results to individuals without dementia: a systematic review. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2018; 10:72. [PMID: 30055660 PMCID: PMC6064628 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0398-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Disclosure of amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) results to individuals without dementia has become standard practice in secondary prevention trials and also increasingly occurs in clinical practice. However, this is controversial given the current lack of understanding of the predictive value of a PET result at the individual level and absence of disease-modifying treatments. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature on the disclosure of amyloid PET in cognitively normal (CN) individuals and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in both research and clinical settings. Methods We performed a systematic literature search of four scientific databases. Two independent reviewers screened the identified records and selected relevant articles. Included articles presented either empirical data or theoretical data (i.e. arguments in favor or against amyloid status disclosure). Results from the theoretical data were aggregated and presented per theme. Results Of the seventeen included studies, eleven reported empirical data and six provided theoretical arguments. There was a large variation in the design of the empirical studies, which were almost exclusively in the context of cognitively normal trial participants, comprising only two prospective cohort studies quantitatively assessing the psychological impact of PET result disclosure which showed a low risk of psychological harm after disclosure. Four studies showed that both professionals and cognitively normal individuals support amyloid PET result disclosure and underlined the need for clear disclosure protocols. From the articles presenting theoretical data, we identified 51 ‘pro’ and ‘contra’ arguments. Theoretical arguments in favor or against disclosure were quite consistent across population groups and settings. Arguments against disclosure focused on the principle of non-maleficence, whereas its psychological impact and predictive value is unknown. Important arguments in favor of amyloid disclosure are the patients right to know (patient autonomy) and that it enables early future decision making. Discussion Before amyloid PET result disclosure in individuals without dementia in a research or clinical setting is ready for widespread application, more research is needed about its psychological impact, and its predictive value at an individual level. Finally, communication materials and strategies to support disclosure of amyloid PET results should be further developed and prospectively evaluated. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0398-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arno de Wilde
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marieke M van Buchem
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - René H J Otten
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology & Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
233
|
Reijs BLR, Vos SJB, Soininen H, Lötjonen J, Koikkalainen J, Pikkarainen M, Hall A, Vanninen R, Liu Y, Herukka SK, Freund-Levi Y, Frisoni GB, Frölich L, Nobili F, Rikkert MO, Spiru L, Tsolaki M, Wallin ÅK, Scheltens P, Verhey F, Visser PJ. Association Between Later Life Lifestyle Factors and Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers in Non-Demented Individuals: A Longitudinal Descriptive Cohort Study. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 60:1387-1395. [PMID: 29036813 DOI: 10.3233/jad-170039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle factors have been associated with the risk of dementia, but the association with Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between later life lifestyle factors and AD biomarkers (i.e., amyloid-β 1-42 (Aβ42) and tau in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and hippocampal volume) in individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In addition, to examine the effect of later life lifestyle factors on developing AD-type dementia in individuals with MCI. METHODS We selected individuals with SCD (n = 111) and MCI (n = 353) from the DESCRIPA and Kuopio Longitudinal MCI studies. CSF Aβ42 and tau concentrations were assessed with ELISA assay and hippocampal volume with multi-atlas segmentation. Lifestyle was assessed by clinical interview at baseline for: social activity, physical activity, cognitive activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and sleep. We performed logistic and Cox regression analyses adjusted for study site, age, gender, education, and diagnosis. Prediction for AD-type dementia was performed in individuals with MCI only. RESULTS Later life lifestyle factors were not associated with AD biomarkers or with conversion to AD-type dementia. AD biomarkers were strongly associated with conversion to AD-type dementia, but these relations were not modulated by lifestyle factors. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype did not influence the results. CONCLUSIONS Later life lifestyle factors had no impact on key AD biomarkers in individuals with SCD and MCI or on conversion to AD-type dementia in MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babette L R Reijs
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie J B Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jyrki Lötjonen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland.,Combinostics Oy, Tampere, Finland
| | - Juha Koikkalainen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland.,Combinostics Oy, Tampere, Finland
| | - Maria Pikkarainen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anette Hall
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Yawu Liu
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Yvonne Freund-Levi
- Department of NVS, Section of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | | | - Lutz Frölich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), Clinical Neurology, University of Genoa and IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcel Olde Rikkert
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luiza Spiru
- Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Memory and Dementia Centre, G. Papanicolaore General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Åsa K Wallin
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
Paquet C, Bouaziz-Amar E, Cognat E, Volpe-Gillot L, Haddad V, Mahieux F, Dekimeche S, Defontaines B, Chabriat H, Belin C, Texeira A, Goutagny S, Questel F, Azuar J, Sellier PO, Laplanche JL, Hugon J, Dumurgier J. Distribution of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Profiles in Patients Explored for Cognitive Disorders. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 64:889-897. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-180240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Paquet
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Inserm U942, Universite Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Bouaziz-Amar
- Department of Biochemistry, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Cognat
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Inserm U942, Universite Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Victor Haddad
- Department of Geriatrics, Saint Camille Hospital, Bry-sur-Marnes, France
| | - Florence Mahieux
- Department of Geriatrics, Sainte-Perrine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Siham Dekimeche
- Departmentof Geriatrics, Les Gonesses Hospital, Gonesses, France
| | | | - Hugues Chabriat
- Department of Neurology, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Antonio Texeira
- Department of Geriatrics, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Frank Questel
- Department of Psychiatry, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Julien Azuar
- Department of Psychiatry, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Olivier Sellier
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Louis Laplanche
- Department of Biochemistry, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Jacques Hugon
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Inserm U942, Universite Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Inserm U942, Universite Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
235
|
Bos I, Vos SJB, Jansen WJ, Vandenberghe R, Gabel S, Estanga A, Ecay-Torres M, Tomassen J, den Braber A, Lleó A, Sala I, Wallin A, Kettunen P, Molinuevo JL, Rami L, Chetelat G, de la Sayette V, Tsolaki M, Freund-Levi Y, Johannsen P, Novak GP, Ramakers I, Verhey FR, Visser PJ. Amyloid-β, Tau, and Cognition in Cognitively Normal Older Individuals: Examining the Necessity to Adjust for Biomarker Status in Normative Data. Front Aging Neurosci 2018; 10:193. [PMID: 29988624 PMCID: PMC6027060 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated whether amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau affected cognition in cognitively normal (CN) individuals, and whether norms for neuropsychological tests based on biomarker-negative individuals would improve early detection of dementia. We included 907 CN individuals from 8 European cohorts and from the Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative. All individuals were aged above 40, had Aβ status and neuropsychological data available. Linear mixed models were used to assess the associations of Aβ and tau with five neuropsychological tests assessing memory (immediate and delayed recall of Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AVLT), verbal fluency (Verbal Fluency Test, VFT), attention and executive functioning (Trail Making Test, TMT, part A and B). All test except the VFT were associated with Aβ status and this influence was augmented by age. We found no influence of tau on any of the cognitive tests. For the AVLT Immediate and Delayed recall and the TMT part A and B, we calculated norms in individuals without Aβ pathology (Aβ- norms), which we validated in an independent memory-clinic cohort by comparing their predictive accuracy to published norms. For memory tests, the Aβ- norms rightfully identified an additional group of individuals at risk of dementia. For non-memory test we found no difference. We confirmed the relationship between Aβ and cognition in cognitively normal individuals. The Aβ- norms for memory tests in combination with published norms improve prognostic accuracy of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Bos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Stephanie J B Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Willemijn J Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Silvy Gabel
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ainara Estanga
- Center for Research and Advanced Therapies CITA-Alzheimer Foundation, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Mirian Ecay-Torres
- Center for Research and Advanced Therapies CITA-Alzheimer Foundation, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Biological Psychology VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Department of Neurology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Sala
- Department of Neurology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anders Wallin
- Section for Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Petronella Kettunen
- Section for Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - José L Molinuevo
- Alzheimer's Disease & Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hopsital Clínic Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Barcelona Beta Brain Research Center Unversitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorena Rami
- Alzheimer's Disease & Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hopsital Clínic Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gaël Chetelat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR-S U1237, Université de Caen-Normandie GIP Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Vincent de la Sayette
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1077, Université de Caen Normandie Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Caen, France.,CHU de Caen Service de Neurologie, Caen, France
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- 1st Department of Neurology University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Yvonne Freund-Levi
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Caring Sciences and Society (NVS) Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Psychiatry Norrtälje Hospital Tiohundra, Norrtälje, Sweden
| | - Peter Johannsen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Gerald P Novak
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development Titusville, NJ, United States
| | - Inez Ramakers
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Frans R Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
236
|
Rosa IM, Henriques AG, Carvalho L, Oliveira J, da Cruz E Silva OAB. Screening Younger Individuals in a Primary Care Setting Flags Putative Dementia Cases and Correlates Gastrointestinal Diseases with Poor Cognitive Performance. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2018; 43:15-28. [PMID: 27907913 DOI: 10.1159/000452485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Diagnosing dementia is challenging in many primary care settings, given the limited human resources and the lack of current diagnostic tools. With this in mind, a primary care-based cohort was established in the Aveiro district of Portugal. METHODS A total of 568 participants were evaluated using cognitive tests and APOE genotyping. RESULTS The findings revealed a dementia prevalence of 12%. A strong correlation between increasing Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores and education was clearly evident. Other highly relevant risk factors were activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL, aging, depression, gender, the APOE ε4 allele, and comorbidities (depression as well as gastrointestinal, osteoarticular, and neurodegenerative diseases). A hitherto unreported, significant correlation between gastrointestinal disease and high CDR score was clearly observable. CONCLUSIONS This study shows the merit of carrying out a dementia screening on younger subjects. Significantly, 71 subjects in the age group of 50-65 years were flagged for follow-up studies; furthermore, these cases with a potentially early onset of dementia were identified in a primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilka M Rosa
- Neuroscience and Signalling Laboratory, Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
237
|
Kuller LH. A new era for dementia epidemiology: Alzheimer’s disease, hardening of arteries, or just old age? Eur J Epidemiol 2018; 33:613-616. [DOI: 10.1007/s10654-018-0420-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
238
|
Hansson O, Mikulskis A, Fagan AM, Teunissen C, Zetterberg H, Vanderstichele H, Molinuevo JL, Shaw LM, Vandijck M, Verbeek MM, Savage M, Mattsson N, Lewczuk P, Batrla R, Rutz S, Dean RA, Blennow K. The impact of preanalytical variables on measuring cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A review. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14:1313-1333. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Revised: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Hansson
- Department of Neurology; Skåne University Hospital; Lund Sweden
- Memory Clinic; Skåne University Hospital; Malmö Sweden
| | | | - Anne M. Fagan
- Department of Neurology; Washington University School of Medicine; St Louis MO USA
| | | | - Henrik Zetterberg
- UK Dementia Research Institute; London UK
- Department of Molecular Neuroscience; UCL Institute of Neurology; London UK
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Mölndal Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry; Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg; Mölndal Sweden
| | | | - Jose Luis Molinuevo
- BarcelonaBeta Brain Research Center; Pasqual Maragall Foundation; Barcelona Spain
| | - Leslie M. Shaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Perelman School of Medicine; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA USA
| | | | - Marcel M. Verbeek
- Radboud University Medical Center; Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine; Donders Institute for Brain; Cognition and Behaviour; Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | | | - Niklas Mattsson
- Department of Neurology; Skåne University Hospital; Lund Sweden
| | - Piotr Lewczuk
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy; Universitätsklinikum Erlangen; Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Germany
- Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics; Medical University of Bialystok; Poland
| | | | | | - Robert A. Dean
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Indiana University School of Medicine; Indianapolis IN USA
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Mölndal Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry; Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg; Mölndal Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
239
|
Vos SJ, Visser PJ. Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Refinement of the Concept. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 64:S213-S227. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-179943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J.B. Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
Santana I, Baldeiras I, Santiago B, Duro D, Freitas S, Pereira MT, Almeida MR, Oliveira CR. Underlying Biological Processes in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Amyloidosis Versus Neurodegeneration. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 64:S647-S657. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-179908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Santana
- Department of Neurology, Dementia Clinic, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Inês Baldeiras
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Beatriz Santiago
- Department of Neurology, Dementia Clinic, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Diana Duro
- Department of Neurology, Dementia Clinic, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Sandra Freitas
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Miguel Tábuas Pereira
- Department of Neurology, Dementia Clinic, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Catarina Resende Oliveira
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
241
|
Estimates of age-related memory decline are inflated by unrecognized Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2018; 70:170-179. [PMID: 30015036 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive decline is considered an inevitable consequence of aging; however, estimates of cognitive aging may be influenced negatively by undetected preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to determine the extent to which estimates of cognitive aging were biased by preclinical AD. Cognitively normal older adults (n = 494) with amyloid-β status determined from positron emission tomography neuroimaging underwent serial neuropsychological assessment at 18-month intervals over 72 months. Estimates of the effects of age on verbal memory, working memory, executive function, and processing speed were derived using linear mixed models. The presence of preclinical AD and clinical progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia during the study were then added to these models as covariates. Initially, age was associated with decline across all 4 cognitive domains. With the effects of elevated amyloid-β and clinical progression controlled, age was no longer associated with decline in verbal or working memory. However, the magnitude of decline was reduced only slightly for executive function and was unchanged for processing speed. Thus, considered together, the results of the study indicate that undetected preclinical AD negatively biases estimates of age-related cognitive decline for verbal and working memory.
Collapse
|
242
|
Roe CM, Babulal GM, Stout SH, Carr DB, Williams MM, Benzinger TLS, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM, Ances BM, Morris JC. Using the A/T/N Framework to Examine Driving in Preclinical AD. Geriatrics (Basel) 2018; 3:23. [PMID: 29805967 PMCID: PMC5964600 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics3020023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The A/T/N classification system is the foundation of the 2018 NIA-AA Research Framework and is intended to guide the Alzheimer disease (AD) research agenda for the next 5–10 years. Driving is a widespread functional activity that may be particularly useful in investigation of functional changes in pathological AD before onset of cognitive symptoms. We examined driving in preclinical AD using the A/T/N framework and found that the onset of driving difficulties is most associated with abnormality of both amyloid and tau pathology, rather than amyloid alone. These results have implications for participant selection into clinical trials and for the application time of interventions aimed at prolonging the time of safe driving among older adults with preclinical AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M. Roe
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (G.M.B.); (S.H.S.); (B.M.A.)
| | - Ganesh M. Babulal
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (G.M.B.); (S.H.S.); (B.M.A.)
| | - Sarah H. Stout
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (G.M.B.); (S.H.S.); (B.M.A.)
| | - David B. Carr
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | | | - Tammie L. S. Benzinger
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | - Anne M. Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, the Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (A.M.F.); (D.M.H.)
| | - David M. Holtzman
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, the Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (A.M.F.); (D.M.H.)
| | - Beau M. Ances
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (G.M.B.); (S.H.S.); (B.M.A.)
| | - John C. Morris
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Occupational Therapy, Pathology and Immunology, Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
243
|
Vemuri P. "Exceptional brain aging" without Alzheimer's disease: triggers, accelerators, and the net sum game. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2018; 10:53. [PMID: 29859131 PMCID: PMC5984828 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0373-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background As human longevity increases and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) increasingly becomes a significant societal burden, finding pathways or protective factors that facilitate exceptional brain aging without AD pathophysiologies (ADP) will be critical. The goal of this viewpoint is two-fold: 1) to present evidence for “exceptional brain aging” without ADP; and 2) to bring together ideas and observations from the literature and present them as testable hypotheses for biomarker studies to discover protective factors for “exceptional brain aging” without ADP and AD dementia. Discovering pathways to exceptional aging There are three testable hypotheses. First, discovering and quantifying links between risk factor(s) and early ADP changes in midlife using longitudinal biomarker studies will be fundamental to understanding why the majority of individuals deviate from normal aging to the AD pathway. Second, a risk factor may have quantifiably greater impact as a trigger and/or accelerator on a specific component of the biomarker cascade (amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration). Finally, and most importantly, while each risk factor may have a different mechanism of action on AD biomarkers, “exceptional aging” and protection against AD dementia will come from “net sum” protection against all components of the biomarker cascade. The knowledge of the mechanism of action of risk factor(s) from hypotheses 1 and 2 will aid in better characterization of their effect on outcomes, identification of subpopulations that would benefit, and the timing at which the risk factor(s) would have the maximal impact. Additionally, hypothesis 3 highlights the importance of multifactorial or multi-domain approaches to “exceptional aging” as well as prevention of AD dementia. Conclusion While important strides have been made in identifying risk factors for AD dementia incidence, further efforts are needed to translate these into effective preventive strategies. Using biomarker studies for understanding the mechanism of action, effect size estimation, selection of appropriate end-points, and better subject recruitment based on subpopulation effects are fundamental for better design and success of prevention trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashanthi Vemuri
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
Lewczuk P, Riederer P, O’Bryant SE, Verbeek MM, Dubois B, Visser PJ, Jellinger KA, Engelborghs S, Ramirez A, Parnetti L, Jack CR, Teunissen CE, Hampel H, Lleó A, Jessen F, Glodzik L, de Leon MJ, Fagan AM, Molinuevo JL, Jansen WJ, Winblad B, Shaw LM, Andreasson U, Otto M, Mollenhauer B, Wiltfang J, Turner MR, Zerr I, Handels R, Thompson AG, Johansson G, Ermann N, Trojanowski JQ, Karaca I, Wagner H, Oeckl P, van Waalwijk van Doorn L, Bjerke M, Kapogiannis D, Kuiperij HB, Farotti L, Li Y, Gordon BA, Epelbaum S, Vos SJB, Klijn CJM, Van Nostrand WE, Minguillon C, Schmitz M, Gallo C, Mato AL, Thibaut F, Lista S, Alcolea D, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Kornhuber J, Riederer P, Gallo C, Kapogiannis D, Mato AL, Thibaut F. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry. World J Biol Psychiatry 2018; 19:244-328. [PMID: 29076399 PMCID: PMC5916324 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2017.1375556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In the 12 years since the publication of the first Consensus Paper of the WFSBP on biomarkers of neurodegenerative dementias, enormous advancement has taken place in the field, and the Task Force takes now the opportunity to extend and update the original paper. New concepts of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the conceptual interactions between AD and dementia due to AD were developed, resulting in two sets for diagnostic/research criteria. Procedures for pre-analytical sample handling, biobanking, analyses and post-analytical interpretation of the results were intensively studied and optimised. A global quality control project was introduced to evaluate and monitor the inter-centre variability in measurements with the goal of harmonisation of results. Contexts of use and how to approach candidate biomarkers in biological specimens other than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), e.g. blood, were precisely defined. Important development was achieved in neuroimaging techniques, including studies comparing amyloid-β positron emission tomography results to fluid-based modalities. Similarly, development in research laboratory technologies, such as ultra-sensitive methods, raises our hopes to further improve analytical and diagnostic accuracy of classic and novel candidate biomarkers. Synergistically, advancement in clinical trials of anti-dementia therapies energises and motivates the efforts to find and optimise the most reliable early diagnostic modalities. Finally, the first studies were published addressing the potential of cost-effectiveness of the biomarkers-based diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Lewczuk
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, and Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Medical University of Białystok, and Department of Biochemical Diagnostics, University Hospital of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
| | - Peter Riederer
- Center of Mental Health, Clinic and Policlinic of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sid E. O’Bryant
- Institute for Healthy Aging, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Marcel M. Verbeek
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d’Alzheimer (IM2A), Salpêtrièrie Hospital, INSERM UMR-S 975 (ICM), Paris 6 University, Paris, France
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Centre, Amsterdam Neuroscience VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Neurology and Memory Clinic, Hospital Network Antwerp (ZNA) Middelheim and Hoge Beuken, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alfredo Ramirez
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lucilla Parnetti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, Lab of Clinical Neurochemistry, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald Hampel
- AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 06, Inserm, CNRS, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière (ICM), Département de Neurologie, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d’Alzheimer (IM2A), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Boulevard de l’hôpital, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Department of Neurology, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau - Hospital de Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, CIBERNED, Spain
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Disorders (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Lidia Glodzik
- Center for Brain Health, Department of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mony J. de Leon
- Center for Brain Health, Department of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne M. Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonabeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hospital Clínic, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Willemijn J. Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bengt Winblad
- Karolinska Institutet, Department NVS, Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Leslie M. Shaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ulf Andreasson
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Brit Mollenhauer
- Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik, Kassel and University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Neurology, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany
- iBiMED, Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Martin R. Turner
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Inga Zerr
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany
- Clinical Dementia Centre, Department of Neurology, University Medical School, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ron Handels
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Karolinska Institutet, Department NVS, Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Huddinge, Sweden
| | | | - Gunilla Johansson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department NVS, Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Natalia Ermann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, and Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - John Q. Trojanowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ilker Karaca
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Holger Wagner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Patrick Oeckl
- Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Linda van Waalwijk van Doorn
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Bjerke
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Kapogiannis
- Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health (NIA/NIH), Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - H. Bea Kuiperij
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lucia Farotti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, Lab of Clinical Neurochemistry, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Yi Li
- Center for Brain Health, Department of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian A. Gordon
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Stéphane Epelbaum
- Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d’Alzheimer (IM2A), Salpêtrièrie Hospital, INSERM UMR-S 975 (ICM), Paris 6 University, Paris, France
| | - Stephanie J. B. Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina J. M. Klijn
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Carolina Minguillon
- Barcelonabeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matthias Schmitz
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Göttingen, Germany
- Clinical Dementia Centre, Department of Neurology, University Medical School, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Carla Gallo
- Departamento de Ciencias Celulares y Moleculares/Laboratorios de Investigación y Desarrollo, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Andrea Lopez Mato
- Chair of Psychoneuroimmunoendocrinology, Maimonides University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Florence Thibaut
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cochin-Site Tarnier 89 rue d’Assas, INSERM 894, Faculty of Medicine Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Simone Lista
- AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 06, Inserm, CNRS, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière (ICM), Département de Neurologie, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d’Alzheimer (IM2A), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Boulevard de l’hôpital, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Alcolea
- Department of Neurology, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques Sant Pau - Hospital de Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, CIBERNED, Spain
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, and Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
245
|
Khan TK. An Algorithm for Preclinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci 2018; 12:275. [PMID: 29760644 PMCID: PMC5936981 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Almost all Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapeutic trials have failed in recent years. One of the main reasons for failure is due to designing the disease-modifying clinical trials at the advanced stage of the disease when irreversible brain damage has already occurred. Diagnosis of the preclinical stage of AD and therapeutic intervention at this phase, with a perfect target, are key points to slowing the progression of the disease. Various AD biomarkers hold enormous promise for identifying individuals with preclinical AD and predicting the development of AD dementia in the future, but no single AD biomarker has the capability to distinguish the AD preclinical stage. A combination of complimentary AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ42, tau, and phosphor-tau), non-invasive neuroimaging, and genetic evidence of AD can detect preclinical AD in the in-vivo ante mortem brain. Neuroimaging studies have examined region-specific cerebral blood flow (CBF) and microstructural changes in the preclinical AD brain. Functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) MRI, arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI, and advanced PET have potential application in preclinical AD diagnosis. A well-validated simple framework for diagnosis of preclinical AD is urgently needed. This article proposes a comprehensive preclinical AD diagnostic algorithm based on neuroimaging, CSF biomarkers, and genetic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tapan K Khan
- Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Blanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| |
Collapse
|
246
|
Lopez OL, Becker JT, Chang Y, Klunk WE, Mathis C, Price J, Aizenstein HJ, Snitz B, Cohen AD, DeKosky ST, Ikonomovic M, Kamboh MI, Kuller LH. Amyloid deposition and brain structure as long-term predictors of MCI, dementia, and mortality. Neurology 2018; 90:e1920-e1928. [PMID: 29695596 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test the hypothesis that brain structural integrity (i.e., hippocampal [HIP] volume), white matter lesions (WMLs), and β-amyloid deposition are associated with long-term increased risk of incident dementia and mortality in 183 cognitively normal individuals and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) aged 80 years and older. METHODS All participants had a brain structural MRI scan and PET scan with 11C-labeled Pittsburgh compound B in 2009 and were reexamined yearly through 2015 (mean follow-up time 5.2 ± 1.3 years). RESULTS In the last evaluation through 2010-2015, 56 (31%) participants were cognitively normal, 67 (37%) had MCI, and 60 (33%) had dementia. Fifty-seven (31%) died during follow-up, and 20 (35%) developed dementia before their death. All 3 biomarkers were independent predictors of incident dementia in all participants. After adjusting for the risk of dying, amyloid deposition and WMLs remained strong predictors. Of the 60 participants with incident dementia, 54 (90%) had at least one imaging abnormality. Participants with no biomarker positivity had a very low risk of dementia (16%), while 75% of the participants with the 3 biomarkers progressed to dementia. HIP volume and β-amyloid deposition were associated with death only in participants with MCI. CONCLUSIONS This study showed the presence of more than one biomarker was a stronger long-term predictor of incident dementia than any biomarker alone. After adjusting for the risk of dying, amyloid deposition and WMLs were stronger predictors of dementia than HIP volume. The risk of dying during follow-up was associated with both neurodegeneration and amyloid deposition, especially in individuals with MCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar L Lopez
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville.
| | - James T Becker
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - YueFang Chang
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - William E Klunk
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Chester Mathis
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Julia Price
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Howard J Aizenstein
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Beth Snitz
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Ann D Cohen
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Steven T DeKosky
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Milos Ikonomovic
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - M Ilyas Kamboh
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Lewis H Kuller
- From the Departments of Neurology (O.L.L., J.T.B., B.S., M.I.), Psychiatry (O.L.L., J.T.B., W.E.K., H.J.A., A.D.C.), Psychology (J.T.B.), Neurosurgery (Y.C.), Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health (Y.C., L.H.K.), Radiology (C.M., J.P.), Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.M.), and Genetics (M.I.K.), University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, PA; and Department of Neurology (S.T.D.), University of Florida, Gainesville
| |
Collapse
|
247
|
Nouriziabari B, Sarkar S, Tanninen SE, Dayton RD, Klein RL, Takehara-Nishiuchi K. Aberrant Cortical Event-Related Potentials During Associative Learning in Rat Models for Presymptomatic Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 63:725-740. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-171033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bardia Nouriziabari
- Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Susmita Sarkar
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Robert D. Dayton
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neuroscience, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Ronald L. Klein
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neuroscience, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi
- Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Neuroscience Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
248
|
Subthreshold Amyloid Predicts Tau Deposition in Aging. J Neurosci 2018; 38:4482-4489. [PMID: 29686045 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0485-18.2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Current approaches to the early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) rely upon classifying individuals as "positive" or "negative" for biomarkers related to the core pathology of β-amyloid (Aβ). However, the accumulation of Aβ begins slowly, years before biomarkers become abnormal. We used longitudinal [11C] Pittsburgh Compound B PET scanning and neuropsychological assessment to investigate the earliest changes in AD pathology and how it affects memory in cognitively normal older humans (N = 71; mean age 75 years; 35% male). We used [18F] AV-1451 PET scanning at the end of the observation period to measure subsequent tau deposition in a subset of our sample (N = 37). We found evidence for an inverted-U relationship between baseline Aβ levels and Aβ slope in asymptomatic older adults, suggesting a slowing of Aβ accumulation even in cognitively normal adults. In participants who were nominally amyloid negative, both the rate of amyloid accumulation and the baseline levels of Aβ predicted early tau deposition in cortical Braak regions associated with AD. Amyloid measures were only sensitive to memory decline as baseline levels of Aβ increased, suggesting that pathological accumulation occurs before impacting memory. These findings support the necessity of early intervention with amyloid-lowering therapies even in those who are amyloid negative.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The progressive nature of Alzheimer's disease (AD) necessitates the earliest possible detection of pathological or cognitive change if disease progression is to be slowed. We examined cognitively normal older adults in whom AD pathology is starting to develop, with the goal of early detection of AD pathology or cognitive changes. We found amyloid measures to be sensitive early on in predicting subsequent early tau deposition. Further, it appears that rates of amyloid accumulation already begin to slow in preclinical AD, suggesting that it is a relatively late stage of AD progression. Thus, it is crucial to examine older adults early, before amyloid levels have saturated, to intervene to slow disease progression.
Collapse
|
249
|
Kern S, Zetterberg H, Kern J, Zettergren A, Waern M, Höglund K, Andreasson U, Wetterberg H, Börjesson-Hanson A, Blennow K, Skoog I. Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems. Neurology 2018; 90:e1682-e1691. [PMID: 29653987 PMCID: PMC5952969 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) according to current classification systems by examining CSF from a representative general population sample of 70-year-olds from Gothenburg, Sweden. Method The sample was derived from the population-based H70 Gothenburg Birth Cohort Studies in Gothenburg, Sweden. The participants (n = 322, age 70 years) underwent comprehensive neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and somatic examinations. CSF levels of β-amyloid (Aβ)42, Aβ40, total tau, and phosphorylated tau were measured. Preclinical AD was classified according to criteria of the A/T/N system, Dubois 2016, National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria, and International Working Group-2 (IWG-2) criteria. Individuals with Clinical Dementia Rating score >0 were excluded, leaving 259 cognitively unimpaired individuals. Results The prevalence of amyloid pathology was 22.8%, of total tau pathology was 33.2%, and of phosphorylated tau pathology was 6.9%. With the A/T/N system, the prevalence of A+/T−/N− was 13.1%, A+/T−/N+ was 7.3%, A+/T+/N+ was 2.3%, A−/T−/N+ was 18.9%, and A−/T+/N+ was 4.6%. When the Dubois criteria were applied, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 36.7% and of preclinical AD was 9.7%. With the NIA-AA criteria, the prevalence of stage 1 was 13.1% and stage 2 was 9.7%. With the IWG-2 criteria, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 9.7%. The APOE ε4 allele was associated with several of the categories. Men more often had total tau pathology, A+/T−/N+, preclinical AD according to Dubois 2016, asymptomatic at risk for AD according to the IWG-2 criteria, and NIA-AA stage 2. Conclusion The prevalence of pathologic AD markers was very common (46%) in a representative population sample of 70-year-olds. The clinical implications of these findings need to be scrutinized further in longitudinal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Kern
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK.
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Jürgen Kern
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Anna Zettergren
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Margda Waern
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Kina Höglund
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Ulf Andreasson
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Hanna Wetterberg
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Anne Börjesson-Hanson
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Ingmar Skoog
- From the Department of Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit (S.K., J.K., A.Z., M.W., H.W., A.B.-H., I.S.) and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (S.K., H.Z., K.H., U.A., K.B.,), Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and UCL Institute of Neurology (H.Z.), Queen Square, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
250
|
One step towards dementia prevention. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:294-295. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30086-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|