Comparative effectiveness of cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based chemotherapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma

Cisplatin-based first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma after previous perioperative cisplatin-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Outcomes with cisplatin-based first-line therapy for advanced UC after previous perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy are unclear. In this study we evaluated outcomes with a focus on the effect of time from previous cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected for patients who received cisplatin-based first-line therapy for advanced UC after previous perioperative cisplatin-based therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the prognostic ability of visceral metastasis, ECOG PS, TFPC, anemia, leukocytosis, and albumin on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Data were available for 41 patients from 8 institutions including 31 men (75.6%). The median age was 61 (range, 41-77) years, most received gemcitabine plus cisplatin (n = 26; 63.4%), and the median number of cycles was 4 (range, 1-8). The median OS was 68 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.0-81.0). Multivariable Cox regression analysis results showed an independent prognostic effect on OS for PS > 0 versus 0 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.56 [95% CI, 1.66-12.52]; P = .003) and TFPC ≥ 78 weeks versus < 78 weeks (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.21-1.07]; P = .072). The prognostic model for OS was internally validated with c-index = 0.68. Patients with TFPC < 52 weeks, 52 to 104 weeks, and ≥ 104 weeks had median survival of 42, 70, and 162 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Longer TFPC ≥ 78 weeks and ECOG PS = 0 were independently prognostic for better survival with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced UC after previous perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The data support using TFPC ≥ 52 weeks to rechallenge with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio persistent during first-line chemotherapy predicts poor clinical outcome in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

BACKGROUND

Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an index of systemic inflammation, is associated with poor outcome for various types of cancers. We assessed the role on outcome prediction of NLR at baseline and persistent during first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy between January 2003 and December 2012. The cutoff values of NLR (>3 vs. <3) were evaluated before therapy and at day 1 of the second and third cycle (follow-up NLR). After univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox regression model and included the following variables: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (≥ 2 vs. 0-1), visceral disease (present vs. absent), hemoglobin (<12 g/dL vs. >12 g/dL), pretherapy NLR (>3 vs. <3), and follow-up NLR (>3 vs. ≤ 3).

RESULTS

Patients with pre- and follow-up NLR of >3 had a median progression-free survival of 3.2 months and a median overall survival of 5.7 months. In multivariate analysis, visceral metastases, pretherapy hemoglobin, and follow-up NLR were significant predictors of progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, P = 0.0001; HR 1.57, P = 0.0015; HR 2.77, P < 0.0001, respectively], and of overall survival (HR 1.60, P = 0.0023; HR 1.59, P = 0.0024; HR 2.89, P < 0.0001, respectively); whereas pretherapy NLR remained as predictor of overall survival only (HR 1.53, P = 0.0101).

CONCLUSIONS

An increased NLR persistent during first-line chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor for patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Delivery of perioperative chemotherapy for bladder cancer in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Few articles have documented regimens and timing of perioperative chemotherapy for bladder cancer in routine practice. Here, we describe practice patterns in the general population of Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, treatment and physician billing records were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to describe use of neoadjuvant (NACT) and adjuvant (ACT) chemotherapy among all patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with cystectomy in Ontario 1994-2008. Time to initiation of ACT (TTAC) was measured from cystectomy. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Of 2944 patients undergoing cystectomy, 4% (129/2944) and 19% (571/2944) were treated with NACT and ACT, respectively. Five-year OS was 25% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17% to 34%] for NACT, 29% (95% CI 25% to 33%) for ACT cases. Among patients with identifiable drug regimens, cisplatin was used in 82% (253/308) and carboplatin in 14% (43/308). The most common regimens were gemcitabine-cisplatin (54%, 166/308) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (MVAC) (21%, 66/308). Mean TTAC was 10 weeks; 23% of patients had TTAC >12 weeks. TTAC >12 weeks was associated with inferior OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.00-1.62] and CSS (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.00-1.69). In adjusted analyses, OS and CSS were lower among patients treated with carboplatin compared with those treated with cisplatin; OS HR 2.14 (95% CI 1.40-3.29) and CSS HR 2.06 (95% CI 1.26-3.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in the general population receive cisplatin, and this may be associated with superior outcomes to carboplatin. Initiation of ACT beyond 12 weeks is associated with inferior survival. Patients should start ACT as soon as they are medically fit to do so.

Examining the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer by medical oncologists in the United States

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains underutilized in the United States despite evidence supporting its use.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the perioperative chemotherapy management of patients with MIBC by medical oncologists (MedOncs) to move toward standardization of practice

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

A 26-question survey was emailed to 92 MedOncs belonging to the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network or the American Society of Clinical Oncology for completion from May to October 2011 RESULTS: A total of 83 MedOncs completed the survey: 52% were based in academic centers. Most referrals were from urologists (79%). NACT for treatment of MIBC and high-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is offered by 80% and 46% of respondents, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of MIBC and upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is offered by 46% and 42% of respondents, respectively. NACT was not offered by 49%, 29%, and 35% of respondents if Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 3 or greater, if patients had T2 lesions without lymphovascular invasion, and if the glomerular filtration rate was<50ml/min, respectively. Chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine/cisplatin (90%), methotrexate/vinblastine/adriamycin/cisplatin (30%), dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (20%), and gemcitabine/carboplatin (37%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most MedOncs (79%) in this survey offer perioperative chemotherapy to all patients with MIBC. This increased use of NACT is higher than previously reported, suggesting an increase in the adoption of recommendations that follow best evidence.

Emerging drugs for urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Advanced urothelial carcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis. In the metastatic setting, the response rate to first-line, cisplatin-containing chemotherapy is high, but survival is poor. Second-line treatment options are limited. Advanced age at diagnosis and the presence of comorbidities often preclude treatment with cisplatin-containing regimens.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the current therapy of urothelial carcinoma, the unmet needs in treatment and the status of drug development in this disease. The molecular targets identified and efforts to incorporate targeted agents into therapy will be addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

There have been no major advances in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma in three decades. Despite high response rates in the first-line setting, survival is limited. Major impediments to improved outcomes include poor durability of response to first-line chemotherapy and lack of second-line treatments. Better understanding in tumor biology has identified multiple targets in urothelial carcinoma; however, such discoveries have yet to lead to the incorporation of targeted agents into the routine treatment of urothelial carcinoma. Multiple ongoing clinical trials are investigating the use of targeted agents in urothelial carcinoma. Continued efforts are underway to better understand the molecular drivers of disease and such efforts are likely to identify additional therapeutic targets.

Antiangiogenic Agents, Chemotherapy, and the Treatment of Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma

A 69-year-old man with a 100 pack-year history of smoking developed gross hematuria. His medical history included hypertension, a silent myocardial infarction, and a cerebrovascular accident complicated by seizures. Cystoscopy and biopsy showed a 4-cm mass at the right ureteral orifice positive for a high-grade papillary transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) with muscularis propria invasion (Fig 1). The computed tomography (CT)/positron emission tomography (PET) scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed hydronephrosis and hydroureter with marked cortical thinning and multiple bilateral PET-avid pulmonary nodules, with the largest in the left upper lung measuring 3.0 × 2.5 cm (Figs 2A, 3A), biopsy of which showed invasive high-grade urothelial carcinoma. The patient consented to join a clinical trial for metastatic TCC (USON [US Oncology Network study] 06040) involving treatment with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and sunitinib (GCS) 37.5 mg per day.1Four days later, he experienced a 10-day hospitalization for acute pancreatitis and neutropenia. Sunitinib was discontinued, and he completed four additional cycles of GC. CT/PET showed that the right ureteral mass and all lung nodules had regressed or disappeared (Figs 2B, 3B). The largest remaining lung nodule at 1.4 cm showed no metabolic activity. He underwent a radical cystoprostatectomy and right nephroureterectomy, disclosing residual high-grade urothelial carcinoma infiltrating the full thickness of the ureteral wall. There was carcinoma in situ of the bladder, and 42 nodes were negative for cancer. The surgery was followed by a small, uncomplicated myocardial infarction. A scheduled left thoracotomy to remove the remaining nodule was cancelled. No additional chemotherapy was administered, and the patient remains free of recurrence 2 years from initiation of chemotherapy. The 1.4-cm nodule has calcified and remains stable and metabolically inactive. He has no sequelae of chemotherapy or surgery, with a creatinine level of 1.35 mg/dL.

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in septuagenarians with metastatic urothelial cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, cisplatin is frequently avoided in elderly patients due to concerns regarding toxicities. We analyzed the efficacy, and tolerability, of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients.

METHODS

Individual patient data were pooled from 8 phase II and III trials evaluating cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Adverse events, treatment delivery, response proportions, and survival outcomes were compared between patients aged<70 vs. ≥ 70 years.

RESULTS

Of the 543 patients included, 162 patients (30%) were ≥ 70 years old. The majority (93%) of elderly patients were aged 70 to 79 years. There was no significant difference in the proportions of patients experiencing Grade 3 to 4 renal failure, febrile neutropenia, or treatment-related death between younger and older patient cohorts. The median survival of the patients ≥ 70 years was 12.1 months compared to 12.8 months for patients<70 years (P = 0.91). There was no significant difference in survival between age groups when controlling for baseline performance status or the presence of visceral metastases or both.

CONCLUSIONS

Fit septuagenarians, with adequate renal function, tolerate cisplatin-based chemotherapy similarly to their younger counterparts and achieve comparable clinical outcomes.

A systematic review of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

CONTEXT

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a disease with a pattern of predominantly distant and early recurrences. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has demonstrated improved outcomes for MIBC.

OBJECTIVE

To review the data supporting perioperative chemotherapy and emerging regimens for MIBC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Medline databases were searched for original articles published before April 1, 2012, with the search terms bladder cancer, urothelial cancer, radical cystectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Proceedings from the last 5 yr of major conferences were also searched. Novel and promising drugs that have reached clinical trial evaluation were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The major findings are addressed in an evidence-based fashion. Prospective trials and important preclinical data were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy is an established standard, improving overall survival in MIBC. Pathologic complete response appears to be an intermediate surrogate for survival, but this finding requires further validation. Definitive data to support adjuvant chemotherapy do not exist, and there are no data to support perioperative therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients. Utilization of neoadjuvant cisplatin is low, attributable in part to patient/physician choice and the advanced age of patients, who often have multiple comorbidities including renal and/or cardiac dysfunction. Trials are using the neoadjuvant paradigm to detect incremental pathologic response to chemobiologic regimens and brief neoadjuvant single-agent therapy to screen for the biologic activity of agents.

Novel molecular targets for the therapy of urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

First-line platinum-based combinations are active in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma; however, long-term outcomes including disease-specific and overall survival remain suboptimal. In addition, approximately 40 - 50% of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma have coexisting medical issues that preclude the use of cisplatin-based therapy. Improvements in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of urothelial tumorigenesis have led to first-generation clinical trials evaluating novel agents targeting molecular pathways. These are particularly relevant in regard to subpopulations. Novel trial designs warrant consideration to accelerate accrual.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, novel molecular targets for the therapy of urothelial carcinoma, as well as recently completed and ongoing clinical trials utilizing novel targeted agents, are discussed. A Medline search with key words, abstracts reported at national conferences on urothelial carcinoma and NCI clinical trial identifiers was used for this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Improved understanding of molecular biology has identified a number of new molecular targets, but there is a seeming absence of one dominant molecular driver for urothelial cancer. An adaptive and biomarker-derived strategy may be warranted. Clinical trials utilizing targeted agents are ongoing and results are awaited.

New developments in urothelial cancer

Urothelial cancer is among the most chemotherapy-sensitive neoplasms of all the solid tumors. However, for the majority of patients with advanced disease, response durations with conventional treatment are relatively short. Second-line systemic treatment regimens are associated with modest response rates and poor outcomes. Trials in both the first- and second-line settings have demonstrated that a ceiling in efficacy has likely been reached with cytotoxic drugs, particularly in unselected patient populations. Promising areas of investigation include integrating predictive biomarkers to optimize patient selection for specific therapies, disrupting driving oncogenomic mutations, and associated signaling pathways and cotargeting both tumor and the immune system or tumor stroma. In addition, expanded sources of evidence generation are of interest in an effort to refine treatment for the general population of patients with advanced urothelial cancer, not only those who meet the narrow eligibility criteria used in most clinical trials.