Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins. A new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging

Renal time-resolved MR angiography: quantitative comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine with different doses

PURPOSE

Results with different doses of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine were compared at magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was evaluated as a quantitative measure of image quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients (age range, 24-81 years; mean age, 65 years) underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and contrast material-enhanced time-resolved MR angiography. DSA was the standard of reference. Fifteen patients received gadopentetate dimeglumine at doses of 0.2 or 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight. Fifteen patients received gadobenate dimeglumine at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mmol/kg. The SNR was calculated in the aorta and both main renal arteries. The number and degree of stenoses of the renal arteries and accessory vessels were evaluated by four observers.

RESULTS

SNRs with gadobenate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg were significantly superior to those with gadopentetate dimeglumine at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Differences were not statistically significant between the SNRs in the other groups. Eleven (85%) of 13 hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses were detected correctly with MR angiography as were 22 (85%) of 26 accessory renal arteries.

CONCLUSION

SNRs with gadobenate dimeglumine were higher than those with gadopentetate dimeglumine, but in most cases the differences in SNRs were not statistically significant.

Detection of intracranial metastases: a multicenter, intrapatient comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI with routinely used contrast agents at equal dosage

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) with other commercially available MRI contrast agents for the detection of intracranial metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective assessment was performed on MR images from 22 patients enrolled in a prior phase II clinical trial of gadobenate dimeglumine. Each patient underwent two examinations: a first examination with one of three "comparator" agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoterate meglumine) at a dosage of either 0.1 or 0.2 mmol/kg, and then a similar examination with gadobenate dimeglumine at equal dosage. All images were evaluated randomly for lesion number and location in unpaired and then paired fashion by two independent, masked neuroradiologists. A third assessor performed quantitative assessments on the available complete sets of digitally recorded images (10 cases).

RESULTS

The findings for the comparator agents were pooled. Sensitivity for lesion detection with gadobenate dimeglumine (93%-100%) was markedly superior to that of comparator-enhanced examinations (65%-73%). The increase of lesion-to-brain contrast of the main lesion was consistently greater with gadobenate dimeglumine than with comparator agents relative to unenhanced contrast (+43% vs. +27%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadobenate dimeglumine proved to be a more efficacious agent than comparator contrast agents for the detection of intracranial metastatic lesions: superior efficacy was noted by both reviewers for total lesion count as well as for sensitivity and positive predictive value for lesion detection. The higher relaxivity of gadobenate dimeglumine might explain the superior sensitivity of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for the detection of central nervous system metastases.

A clinical comparison of the safety and efficacy of MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine) and Omniscan (Gadodiamide) in magnetic resonance imaging in patients with central nervous system pathology

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The safety and diagnostic efficacy of MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine) in the central nervous system (CNS) were evaluated in a double-blind, multicenter, phase III clinical trial.

METHODS

Two hundred five patients highly suspected of having a CNS lesion (by previous imaging exam) were enrolled at 16 sites in the United States. Patients were randomized to one of three incremental dosing regimens. Magnetic resonance imaging with Omniscan (gadodiamide) at doses of 0.1 and 0.3 mmol/kg was compared with MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine) at doses of 0.05 and 0.15 mmol/kg and at 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg.

RESULTS

Compared with predose images alone, efficacy was demonstrated in each of the gadobenate dimeglumine and gadodiamide groups (single and cumulative doses) as indicated by the level of diagnostic information, number of lesions detected, and contrast-to-noise ratio measurements. The level of diagnostic information from gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.1 mmol/kg was equivalent to that with gadodiamide at the same dose. One of the two blinded reviewers found equivalence between the gadobenate dimeglumine 0.05 mmol/kg dose and gadodiamide at 0.1 mmol/kg. Both reviewers found the level of diagnostic information to be equivalent after the second dose of contrast for all three dosing regimens. The cumulative doses of gadobenate dimeglumine were well tolerated and as safe as gadodiamide.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadobenate dimeglumine is comparable to gadodiamide in terms of safety and efficacy for imaging of CNS lesions, with a possible advantage in imaging applications owing to enhanced T1 relaxivity.

Safety of intravenous gadolinium (Gd-BOPTA) infusion in patients with renal insufficiency

The safety of gadolinium (Gd-benzyloxypropionictetra-acetate [BOPTA] dimeglumine) infusion was evaluated in 32 patients with severe or moderate chronic renal failure in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Renal failure was defined as severe if creatinine clearance was between 10 and 29 mL/min, and as moderate if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 60 mL/min. Serum creatinine level and 24-hour urine samples for creatinine clearance were followed up serially for 7 days after the administration of either gadolinium (Gd-BOPTA dimeglumine), 0.2 mmol/kg, or a saline infusion. No patient experienced a significant change in renal function, defined as an increase in serum creatinine level greater than 0.5 mg/dL more than baseline, and no patient required hospitalization or dialysis during the study period. Gadolinium (Gd-BOPTA dimeglumine) appears to be well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe renal failure.

Evaluation of the accuracy of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the extent to which hepatic lesion characterization and detection is improved by using gadobenate dimeglumine for enhancement of MR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients were imaged before gadobenate dimeglumine administration, immediately after the 2 mL/sec bolus administration of a 0.05 mmol/kg dose (dynamic imaging), and at 60-120 min after the IV infusion at 10 mL/min of a further 0.05 nmol/kg dose (delayed imaging). The accuracy for lesion characterization was assessed for a total of 107 lesions. Sensitivity for lesion detection was assessed for a total of 149 lesions detected on either intra-operative sonography, iodized oil CT, CT during arterial portography, or follow-up contrast-enhanced CT as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant liver lesions increased from 75% and 82% (the findings of two observers) on unenhanced images alone, to 89% and 80% on dynamic images alone (p<0.001, p = 0.8), and to 90.7% when combining the unenhanced and dynamic image sets (p<0.001, p = 0.023). Delayed images did not further improve accuracy (90% and 91%; p = 0.002, p< 0.05). A similar trend was apparent in terms of accuracy for specific diagnosis: values ranged from 49% and 62% on unenhanced images alone, to 76% and 70% on combined unenhanced and dynamic images (p<0.001, p = 0.06), and to 75% and 70% on inclusion of delayed images (p<0.001, p = 0.12). The sensitivity for lesion detection increased from 77% and 81% on unenhanced images alone, to 87% and 85% on combined unenhanced and dynamic images (p = 0.001, p = 0.267), and to 92% and 89% when all images were considered (p<0.001, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine significantly increases sensitivity and accuracy over unenhanced imaging for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions, and delayed MR imaging contributes to the improved detection of lesions.

Phase II double-blind, dose-ranging clinical evaluation of gadobenate dimeglumine in focal liver lesions: with analysis of liver and kidney signal change on early and delayed imaging

To evaluate the effect of contrast dose using gadobenate dimeglumine, 30 patients with focal liver lesions documented by computed tomography or ultrasound were studied by magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T. Patients received one of four doses of gadobenate dimeglumine (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mmol/kg) or saline. The order of dosage was randomized, with both the physician and patient blinded to the administered dose. Scans were obtained before, immediately following injection, and after 80 minutes of delay. Enhancement effects were quantified by region of interest measurements. Films were also reviewed in a randomized prospective fashion by an abdominal radiologist blinded to contrast dose and diagnosis. Higher doses led to a statistically significant improvement in enhancement of normal liver, both on immediate (P = 0.01 for the comparison of 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg immediately post-contrast) and delayed scans (P = 0.003 for the same comparison). Liver-lesion contrast-to-noise ratio also increased with dose, although results for most comparisons by dose were not statistically significant. Scans following gadobenate dimeglumine injection were judged to provide additional diagnostic confidence sufficient to affect patient management in 10 of 24 cases. In seven cases this information was provided by dynamic scans, in one case by delayed scans, and in two cases by both dynamic and delayed scans. In 2 of the 10 cases the dose was 0.025 mmol/kg, in 2 cases 0.05 mmol/kg, in 3 cases 0.1 mmol/kg, and in 3 cases 0.2 mmol/kg. Gadobenate dimeglumine is effective for imaging of focal liver lesions at a range of doses, with trends toward improved diagnostic information at higher doses.

Contrast agents for MRA: future directions

The purpose of this review is to outline recent developments in contrast agents for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and to give some idea of what the future might hold. Up to now, non-binding gadolinium (Gd) chelates have been the agents used for MRA. Modified paramagnetic Gd-based agents with varying degrees of protein interaction have been developed, and these, together with new superparamagnetic compounds, are currently under clinical evaluation. It is likely that two different types of contrast agent will soon be available: extracellular agents for first-pass MRA and intravascular agents mainly for steady-state MRA. Several agents also exhibit certain tissue specific properties in addition to conventional extracellular properties. This will lead to more comprehensive imaging approaches.

Evaluation of gadobenate dimeglumine in hepatocellular carcinoma: results from phase II and phase III clinical trials in Japan

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we reviewed the results of clinical phase II and III trials in Japan. Gd-BOPTA was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg to 139 patients who were suspected to have HCC. Dynamic phase images [breath-hold T1-weighted gradient echo (GRE)], spin-echo (SE) images obtained within 10 minutes of injection, and delayed breath-hold GRE images obtained 40-120 minutes after injection were evaluated. All post-contrast images were compared with T1- and T2-weighted pre-contrast images. The contrast efficacy for the dynamic study was classified as ( ) or (++) in 92.1% (128/139), in 43.1% (59/137) with SE within 10 minutes of injection, and in 43.2% (60/139) with breath-hold GRE at delayed phase. The increase in lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio was best at the arterial phase of dynamic breath-hold GRE. Liver signal-to-noise ratio showed a mean 52.3% increase in delayed phase. Additional information at delayed phase compared with images acquired within 10 minutes of injection (including the dynamic study) was classified as ( ) or (++) in 28.1% (39/139). With regard to safety, the overall incidence of adverse reactions was 5.0% (7/141) of the patients who were suspected to have HCC, all of whom recovered within 12 hours without any sequelae. No clinically important changes were observed in the blood and urine laboratory tests. It was concluded that Gd-BOPTA was well tolerated and effective in both dynamic study and delayed static imaging for the diagnosis of HCC.

Neurotolerability of gadobenate dimeglumine in a rat model of focal brain ischemia: EEG evaluation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The neurologic pathologies for which contrast-enhanced MRI is indicated are often accompanied by a disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which allows the contrast agent to come into contact with the nervous tissue. Thus, assessment of the neurologic safety for a new contrast agent is of crucial importance. The objective of this study was to assess the neurotolerability of the new MRI contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumine using EEG in the presence of focal lesions of the BBB.

METHODS

Lesions of the BBB were obtained inducing a photochemical ischemia in rats. Gadobenate dimeglumine was intravenously administered at 4.0 mmol/kg. An EEG was recorded during sleep/awake behavior and was analyzed for pathologic tracing and for changes in spectral content in terms of total power and frequency index. The presence of the BBB lesions was verified using high-performance liquid chromatography measurement of the gadobenate ion content in the brain.

RESULTS

Gadobenate dimeglumine did not have any epileptogenic effect in ischemic rats. However, it caused a transitory shift of the EEG power spectrum toward the 0.5 to 9 Hz frequency bands of the lesioned hemisphere during quiet wake. In the lesioned cortex, higher levels of gadobenate ion were found until 3 hours after administration.

CONCLUSIONS

In experimental conditions of focal brain ischemia associated with BBB lesions, gadobenate dimeglumine was well tolerated up to doses even 10 times higher than the maximum clinical dose (0.3 mmol/kg) intended for brain imaging procedures.