Emergency stenting for acute occlusion after coronary balloon angioplasty

Salvage from cardiogenic shock by atherectomy after failed emergency coronary artery angioplasty

In this case report of a patient undergoing angioplasty for cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction, recurrent occlusion resulted in recurrence of shock. Atherectomy reestablished lasting patency and reversed the patient's hemodynamic collapse. Atherectomy deserves further investigation as a means to salvage vessel patency during unsuccessful coronary angioplasty.

Percutaneous arterial recanalization

The current status of new techniques for percutaneous arterial recanalization, including laser, thermal and mechanical angioplasty techniques, is described. The reported results, potential advantages and possible future developments are discussed.

Combined percutaneous coronary atherectomy and coronary angioplasty: experience in 19 consecutive patients

Among 82 patients undergoing coronary atherectomy, 19 (23%) underwent this procedure in combination with coronary angioplasty. The most frequently involved vessel was the left anterior descending coronary artery. In 11 patients (58%), attempted atherectomy preceded coronary angioplasty. In 6 of the 11, angioplasty was used after the atherectomy catheter could not be positioned across the lesion; 4 patients underwent "rescue" angioplasty after developing vessel occlusion related to atherectomy and 1 patient had an unsatisfactory result of atherectomy. The success rate of the combined intervention was 82% for these 11 patients. In eight patients (42%), atherectomy was performed after initial angioplasty. In four of the eight, atherectomy was a rescue procedure to manage vessel occlusion by thrombus or intimal dissection and was successful in three. In the other four, angioplasty was performed to establish an easier passage for the atherectomy catheter and was successful in three. Thus, the success rate of the combined intervention was 75% for these eight patients. The overall success rate for all 19 patients was 79%; there was one in-hospital death and one non-Q wave infarction, and one patient required immediate coronary artery surgery. Two other patients underwent coronary artery surgery before hospital discharge. Combined intervention with coronary angioplasty and atherectomy seems to be a relatively safe and effective approach in selected patients when either of these procedures alone is unsuccessful or is accompanied by acute coronary complications.

Restenosis following coronary angioplasty

The last decade has witnessed an enormous increase in the use and success of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. During this time, our knowledge of the mechanisms of angioplasty and of how it relates to the pathophysiology of restenosis has also grown. Despite our better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for it, restenosis remains a significant problem in coronary angioplasty, affecting approximately one third of patients. A variety of factors can affect the measured rate of restenosis, such as the symptomatic status of the patient and the timing of restenosis studies. Certain clinical, anatomic, and procedural factors are associated with increased rates of restenosis. Pharmacologic interventions are ineffective in preventing restenosis. A variety of new mechanical devices are being developed, but their efficacy at this time does not appear to be superior to angioplasty alone. While attempts at preventing restenosis have thus far been unsuccessful, the information gained through the various studies has added tremendously to our knowledge base of angioplasty. Through this better understanding of the mechanisms of angioplasty and restenosis, it is likely that the problem of restenosis will be improved, either through existing technology or by methods yet to be discovered.

Intravascular stenting for stenosis of aortocoronary venous bypass grafts

To test the ability of endoluminal stents to prevent saphenous vein graft restenosis after balloon angioplasty, 13 patients with angina and previous coronary bypass surgery underwent implantation of one or more stents into 14 stenosed grafts. Implantation was technically successful in all cases and there were no major in-hospital complications. During a median follow-up interval of 7 months (range 2 to 26), 10 patients (77%) underwent follow-up angiography. Seven patients remained asymptomatic or in improved condition without further intervention; three patients had further angioplasty with stent implantation for a new stenosis in the same graft. Two patients (20%) developed within-stent restenosis. There was one death from progressive congestive heart failure 7 months after implantation. No patient had a myocardial infarction or needed surgical revascularization during the follow-up period. In selected cases, stent implantation appears to be a promising new technique that may decrease the incidence of restenosis after balloon angioplasty in venous bypass grafts. The rate of complications is low. Further experience and longer follow-up will be needed before definite recommendations can be made about its use.