Very late stent thrombosis and late target lesion revascularization after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: five-year outcome of the j-Cypher Registry

Very long-term (15 to 23 years) outcomes of successful balloon angioplasty compared with bare metal coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Target lesion revascularization (TLR) continues to occur beyond 4 years after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. However, long-term outcomes after balloon angioplasty (BA) compared with BMS are currently unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 1989 to 1990, 659 patients (748 lesions) underwent successful BA with final balloon ≥3.0 mm excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction and were compared with 405 patients (424 lesions) with BMS implantation from June 1990 to 1993. Cumulative incidences of death and target lesion thrombosis (>1 year) were similar between the BA group and the BMS group (44.4% versus 45.4%, P=0.60; and 1.5% versus 0.7%, P=0.99; respectively). Cumulative incidence of TLR during overall follow-up was significantly higher after BA than after BMS implantation (44.6% versus 36.0%, P<0.001), whereas cumulative incidence of late TLR (>4 years) tended to be lower in the BA group than in the BMS group (16.3% versus 21.4%, P=0.16). Cumulative incidence of late TLR after BA was significantly lower in patients with small percent diameter stenosis (%DS) at early follow-up angiography compared with large %DS (14.5% versus 28.0%, P=0.02). In lesions with serial angiography, late lumen loss from early (6 to 14 months) to long-term (4 to 10 years) follow-up angiography was significantly smaller in the BA group (n=42) than in the BMS group (n=55) (-0.08±0.45 mm versus 0.11±0.46 mm, P=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BMS implantation, BA was associated with a trend for less late TLR beyond 4 years and with significantly smaller late lumen loss from early to long-term follow-up angiography.

Mobilization of CD34+ KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells predicts target lesion revascularization

BACKGROUND

Endothelial lesion and regeneration are critical events in the process leading to in-stent restenosis (ISR) after bare metal stent (BMS) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively investigate the relationship between biomarkers reflecting endothelial turnover and the occurrence of ISR.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter prospective observational study that included 156 patients undergoing elective PCI with BMS. Endothelial lesion was assessed by the enumeration of circulating endothelial cells (CECs). Endothelial regeneration was evaluated by enumeration of circulating CD34+ progenitor cells (CD34+ PCs) and CD34+ KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). Measurements were performed before PCI, and 6 and 24 h after PCI. Dynamic changes were evaluated by calculating the delta value of each marker. The primary and secondary endpoints of the study were clinical target lesion revascularizations (TLRs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 28 MACEs were recorded, including 27 TLRs. PCI induced a significant rise in the numbers of CECs, CD34+ PCs, and CD34+ KDR+ EPCs. Baseline, 6-h and 24-h levels of these markers did not differ between patients with and without TLR. The delta percentage of CD34+ KDR+ EPCs was significantly reduced in patients with TLR as compared with patients without TLR (- 0.56 ± 8.1 vs. 2.91 ± 6.2; P = 0.015). In multivariate analysis, the delta percentage of CD34+ KDR+ EPCs independently predicted the occurrence of TLR and MACEs (P = 0.02 and P = 0.014, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The endothelial regenerative response to injury induced by PCI, assessed by CD34+ KDR+ EPCs mobilized among progenitor cells, determines the risk of TLR and MACEs in stable coronary artery disease patients.

Comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: 1-year outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET)

BACKGROUND

Several recent randomized trials comparing everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) reported similar outcomes. However, only 1 trial was powered for a clinical end point, and no trial was powered for evaluating target-lesion revascularization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial is a prospective multicenter randomized open-label trial comparing EES with SES in Japan. The trial was powered for evaluating noninferiority of EES relative to SES in terms of target-lesion revascularization. From February and July 2010, 3197 patients were randomly assigned to receive either EES (1597 patients) or SES (1600 patients). At 1 year, the primary efficacy end point of target-lesion revascularization occurred in 65 patients (4.3%) in the EES group and in 76 patients (5.0%) in the SES group, demonstrating noninferiority of EES to SES (P(noninferiority)<0.0001, and P(superiority)=0.34). Cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis was low and similar between the 2 groups (0.32% versus 0.38%, P=0.77). An angiographic substudy enrolling 571 patients (EES, 285 patients and SES, 286 patients) demonstrated noninferiority of EES relative to SES regarding the primary angiographic end point of in-segment late loss (0.06±0.37 mm versus 0.02±0.46 mm, P(noninferiority)<0.0001, and P(superiority)=0.24) at 278±63 days after index stent implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year clinical and angiographic outcome after EES implantation was noninferior to and not different from that after SES implantation in a stable coronary artery disease population with relatively less complex coronary anatomy. One-year clinical outcome after both EES and SES use was excellent with a low rate of target-lesion revascularization and a very low rate of stent thrombosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01035450.

Prolonged clopidogrel use after bare metal and drug-eluting stent placement: the Veterans Administration drug-eluting stent study

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend combining clopidogrel with aspirin for up to 1 year after coronary stenting, but the value of clopidogrel beyond this time is uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated all patients in the Veterans Administration healthcare system receiving either drug-eluting or bare metal stents from 2002 to 2006. The Veterans Administration National Patient Care and Pharmacy databases were used to extract patient characteristics, duration of clopidogrel use, and outcomes for up to 4 years after the index procedure. We used Cox proportional hazards to estimate hazard ratios for death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and bleeding from a 12-month landmark after stenting that excluded patients with events within the first 12 months. Of 42,254 patients, 29,175 met the study inclusion criteria. Compared with ≤12 months of clopidogrel, prolonged clopidogrel (>12 months) was associated with a lower adjusted risk of death for both drug-eluting stents (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61, 0.82; P<0.01) and bare metal stents (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76, 0.96; P=0.01) as well as for death and myocardial infarction but was unrelated to stroke or major bleeding. The effect of prolonged clopidogrel on death or myocardial infarction was significantly greater among patients receiving drug-eluting (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64, 0.84) compared with bare metal stents (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.98; interaction P=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving clopidogrel beyond 12 months had a lower risk of death or myocardial infarction compared patients receiving clopidogrel ≤12 months. The risk reduction was greater for drug-eluting stents. These data support longer durations of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients receiving a stent, particularly for those receiving a drug-eluting stent.

Repetitive angioscopic observations of a sirolimus-eluting stent deployed in a patient with silent chronic thrombotic occlusion

In the era of the drug-eluting stent, very late stent thrombosis has been the most serious issue in the field of interventional cardiology. A sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) was implanted in an in-stent restenotic lesion in the left circumflex artery of a 69-year-old man. Repetitive coronary angiography and angioscopy revealed that stent struts were covered with yellow neointima at 2 years after the SES deployment. At 4 years after the deployment, coronary angiography revealed the total occlusion of the SES. Angioscopy showed massive mural thrombi and yellow atherosclerotic plaques. Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT), ticlopidine and aspirin, had been continued since the SES deployment. Interventional cardiologists should heed the risk of silent chronic thrombotic occlusion even if struts of SES are fully covered with neointima under continued DAPT.