The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders

Control radiografico postoperatorio de la instrumentacion con tornillos pediculares toracicos en la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia intraoperatoria y postoperatoria de la radiografía en la colocación del tornillo pedícular dorsal y su relación con la tomografía computada (CT). MÉTODOS: Se evaluaron 36 pacientes con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente (EIA). Tres observadores clasifican colocación de los tornillos con radiografia . Estas respuestas se compararon con la tomografía computada. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron un total de 280 tornillos pediculares. La evaluación interobservador fue de 0,56 (concordancia moderada). La evaluación intraobservador fue 0,79 (concordancia). No se presentaron lesiones vasculares o neurológicas. CONCLUSIONES: Según los resultados intra e interobservador, la reproductibilidad de la radiografía postoperatoria no es muy eficaz para el diagnósticar la mala posición de los tornillos de pedículo dorsales. La tomografía computada fue muy útil para determinar la posición de los tornillos pediculares dorsales.

Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This is a meta-analysis to compare the clinical results between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw (PS) fixation in lumbar interbody fusion.

METHODS

We included published studies with no language and year restrictions. The criteria which Koes et al. designed in 1995 were used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies. All data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.1. The primary outcomes included fusion rate and screw complications, and the secondary outcomes were operative time, blood loss, and hospital time.

RESULTS

A total of five prospective studies with 407 patients were included in the current meta-analysis, and four of them were randomized controlled trials. There was no significant difference between unilateral PS fixation and bilateral PS fixation group in fusion rate and screw complications (fusion rate: OR 0.54, Z = 1.33, P = 0.18, I (2) = 0 %; screw complications: OR 1.45, Z = 0.71, P = 0.48; I (2) = 44 %). In the secondary outcomes, the operative time (Z = 3.35, P = 0.0008; I (2) = 95 %) and blood loss (Z = 4.35, P < 0.0001; I (2) = 98 %) was significantly higher in bilateral PS fixation group than in unilateral PS fixation group. Besides, no significant difference was found in hospital time (Z = 1.19, P = 0.24; I (2) = 99 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In our meta-analysis, we found that unilateral PS fixation in lumbar fusion was as effective as bilateral PS fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases without major instability, no significant difference was found in hospital time, fusion rate and screw complications. In terms of operative time and blood loss, unilateral PS fixation even produced better results.

Utility of dual-energy CT virtual keV monochromatic series for the assessment of spinal transpedicular hardware-bone interface

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the utility of dual-energy CT (DECT) virtual kilo-electron volt (keV) monochromatic images for the visualization of the transpedicular screw-bone interface after spinal fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included postfusion spine CT studies performed from October 2011 through April 2012 on a dual-energy 64-MDCT unit (Discovery CT750 HD). Studies were postprocessed on an Advantage Windows workstation (version 4.4) by two neuroradiologists with creation of monochromatic images from 40 to 140 keV. Each reader graded the screw-bone interfaces on the 70-keV images (used for clinical interpretation) and on the monochromatic series using a 5-point scale (1 [uninterpretable] to 5 [excellent]). The grades of the interfaces were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test to detect differences between the 70-keV image and the monochromatic series.

RESULTS

Ninety-two transpedicular screws in 10 patients were studied. Significant improvement in the visibility of the hardware-bone interface was seen on the monochromatic series compared with the 70-keV images: The median grade for the monochromatic series was 4 (range, 2-5) for both readers, whereas the median grade for the 70-keV images was 3 (range, 2-4) for reader 1 and 2 (range, 2-3) for reader 2 (both, p < 0.001). The interobserver agreement using weighted kappa was 0.51 for grading screw-bone interface visualization. The volume CT dose index was 29.5 mGy in all patients and the mean dose-length product was 805.2 mGy × cm.

CONCLUSION

Monochromatic images generated on gemstone spectral DECT are beneficial in the reduction of metallic streak artifact and enable better visualization of the hardware-bone interface than the 70-keV series in patients treated with spinal transpedicular screw fixation.

A new free-hand pedicle screw placement technique with reference to the supraspinal ligament

We sought to compare the safety and accuracy of a new free-hand pedicle screw placement technique to that of the conventional technique. One hundred fifty-three consecutive adult patients with simple fracture in the thoracic or/and lumbar spine were alternately assigned to either the new free-hand or the conventional group. In the new free-hand technique group, preoperative computerized tomography (CT) images were used to calculate the targeted medial-lateral angle of each pedicle trajectory and the pedicle screw was inserted perpendicular to the correspond-ing supraspinal ligament. In the conventional technique group, the medial-lateral and cranial-caudal angle of each pedicle trajectory was determined by intraoperatively under fluoroscopic guidance. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, the time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the operating time and the amount of blood loss during operation were respectively compared. All screws were analyzed by using intraoperative radiographs, intraoperative triggered electromyography (EMG) monitoring data, postoperative CT data and clinical outcomes. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement in the new free-hand technique group and the conventional technique group was 96.3% and 94.2% (P < 0.05), respectively. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time of the new technique group was less than that of the conventional technique group (5.37 seconds vs. 8.79 seconds, P < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in the operating time and the amount of blood loss during operation (P > 0.05). Pedicle screw placement with the free-hand technique which keeps the screw perpendicular to the supraspinal ligament is an accurate, reliable and safe technique to treat simple fracture in the thoracic or lumbar spine.

Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): a cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaveric laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy (C-ARM) for the placement of pedicle screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Radiation exposure remains a concern with traditional methods of intraoperative imaging in spine surgery. The use of O-ARM has been proposed for more accurate and efficient spinal instrumentation. Understanding radiation imparted to patients and surgeons by O-ARM is important for assessing risks and benefits of this technology, especially in light of evolving indications.

METHODS

Four surgeons placed 160 pedicle screws on 8 cadavers without deformity. Eighty pedicle screws were placed using O-ARM and C-ARM each. Instrumentation was placed bilaterally in the thoracic (T1-T6) spine and lumbosacral junction (L5-S1) using a standard open technique, whereas minimally invasive surgery technique was used at the lumbar 3 to 4 (L3-L4) level. A "postoperative" computed tomography (CT) scan was performed on cadavers where instrumentation was done using the C-ARM. An independent musculoskeletal radiologist assessed final images for screw position. Time required to set up and instrumentation was recorded. Dosimeters were placed on multiple aspects of cadavers and surgeons to record radiation exposure.

RESULTS

There were no differences in breach rate between the O-ARM and C-ARM groups (5 vs. 7, χ= 0.63, P = 0.4). The setup time for the O-ARM group was longer than that for the C-ARM group (592 vs. 297 s, P < 0.05). However, the average total time was statistically the same (1629 vs. 1639 s, P = 0.96). Radiation exposure was higher for surgeons in the C-ARM group and cadavers in the O-ARM group. When a "postoperative" CT scan was included in the estimation of the total radiation exposure, there was less of difference between the groups, but still more for the O-ARM group.

CONCLUSION

In cadavers without deformity, O-ARM use results in similar breach rates as C-ARM for the placement of pedicle screws. Time for instrumentation is shorter with the O-ARM, but requires a longer setup time. The O-ARM exposes less radiation to the surgeon, but higher doses to the cadaver.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

DensiProbe Spine: an intraoperative measurement of bone quality in spinal instrumentation. A clinical feasibility study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A new device, DensiProbe, has been developed to provide surgeons with intraoperative information about bone strength by measuring the peak breakaway torque. In cases of low bone quality, the treatment can be adapted to the patient's condition, for example, by improving screw-anchorage with augmentation techniques.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of DensiProbe Spine in patients undergoing transpedicular fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective feasibility study on consecutive patients.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Fourteen women and 16 men were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Local and general bone quality.

METHODS

These consecutive patients scheduled for transpedicular fixation were evaluated for bone mineral density (BMD), which was measured globally by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and locally via biopsies using quantitative microcomputed tomography. The breakaway torque force within the vertebral body was assessed intraoperatively via the transpedicular approach with the DensiProbe Spine. The results were correlated with the areal BMD at the lumbar spine and the local volumetric BMD (vBMD) and a subjective impression of bone strength. The feasibility of the method was evaluated, and the clinical and radiological performance was evaluated over a 1-year follow-up. This study was funded by an AO Spine research grant; DensiProbe was developed at the AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland; the AO Foundation is owner of the intellectual property rights.

RESULTS

In 30 patients, 69 vertebral levels were examined. The breakaway torque consistently correlated with an experienced surgeon's quantified impression of resistance as well as with vBMD of the same vertebra. Beyond a marginal prolongation of surgery time, no adverse events related to the usage of the device were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The intraoperative transpedicular measurement of the peak breakaway torque was technically feasible, safe, and reliably predictive of local vBMD during dorsal spinal instrumentations in a clinical setting. Larger studies are needed to define specific thresholds that indicate a need for the augmentation or instrumentation of additional levels.

Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There is currently no reliable technique for intraoperative assessment of pedicle screw fixation strength and optimal screw size. Several studies have evaluated pedicle screw insertional torque (IT) and its direct correlation with pullout strength. However, there is limited clinical application with pedicle screw IT as it must be measured during screw placement and rarely causes the spine surgeon to change screw size. To date, no study has evaluated tapping IT, which precedes screw insertion, and its ability to predict pedicle screw pullout strength.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to investigate tapping IT and its ability to predict pedicle screw pullout strength and optimal screw size.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical analysis.

METHODS

Twenty fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebral levels were prepared and dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry scanned for bone mineral density (BMD). All specimens were osteoporotic with a mean BMD of 0.60 ± 0.07 g/cm(2). Five specimens (n=10) were used to perform a pilot study, as there were no previously established values for optimal tapping IT. Each pedicle during the pilot study was measured using a digital caliper as well as computed tomography measurements, and the optimal screw size was determined to be equal to or the first size smaller than the pedicle diameter. The optimal tap size was then selected as the tap diameter 1 mm smaller than the optimal screw size. During optimal tap size insertion, all peak tapping IT values were found to be between 2 in-lbs and 3 in-lbs. Therefore, the threshold tapping IT value for optimal pedicle screw and tap size was determined to be 2.5 in-lbs, and a comparison tapping IT value of 1.5 in-lbs was selected. Next, 15 test specimens (n=30) were measured with digital calipers, probed, tapped, and instrumented using a paired comparison between the two threshold tapping IT values (Group 1: 1.5 in-lbs; Group 2: 2.5 in-lbs), randomly assigned to the left or right pedicle on each specimen. Each pedicle was incrementally tapped to increasing size (3.75, 4.00, 4.50, and 5.50 mm) until the threshold value was reached based on the assigned group. Pedicle screw size was determined by adding 1 mm to the tap size that crossed the threshold torque value. Torque measurements were recorded with each revolution during tap and pedicle screw insertion. Each specimen was then individually potted and pedicle screws pulled out "in-line" with the screw axis at a rate of 0.25 mm/sec. Peak pullout strength (POS) was measured in Newtons (N).

RESULTS

The peak tapping IT was significantly increased (50%) in Group 2 (3.23 ± 0.65 in-lbs) compared with Group 1 (2.15 ± 0.56 in-lbs) (p=.0005). The peak screw IT was also significantly increased (19%) in Group 2 (8.99 ± 2.27 in-lbs) compared with Group 1 (7.52 ± 2.96 in-lbs) (p=.02). The pedicle screw pullout strength was also significantly increased (23%) in Group 2 (877.9 ± 235.2 N) compared with Group 1 (712.3 ± 223.1 N) (p=.017). The mean pedicle screw diameter was significantly increased in Group 2 (5.70 ± 1.05 mm) compared with Group 1 (5.00 ± 0.80 mm) (p=.0002). There was also an increased rate of optimal pedicle screw size selection in Group 2 with 9 of 15 (60%) pedicle screws compared with Group 1 with 4 of 15 (26.7%) pedicle screws within 1 mm of the measured pedicle width. There was a moderate correlation for tapping IT with both screw IT (r=0.54; p=.002) and pedicle screw POS (r=0.55; p=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that tapping IT directly correlates with pedicle screw IT, pedicle screw pullout strength, and optimal pedicle screw size. Therefore, tapping IT may be used during thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation as an adjunct to preoperative imaging and clinical experience to maximize fixation strength and optimize pedicle "fit and fill" with the largest screw possible. However, further prospective, in vivo studies are necessary to evaluate the intraoperative use of tapping IT to predict screw loosening/complications.

Brachial plexus reconstruction following resection of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: case report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

The main therapeutic approach for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) of the brachial plexus is wide local excision. Sacrifice of some--occasionally all--elements of the brachial plexus often is required to obtain complete resection, and therefore can be associated with significant morbidity. While peripheral nerve repair is commonly used in the setting of traumatic nerve injury, little is known about its potential use in the treatment of MPNST.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We present a patient with an enlarging right neck mass who was diagnosed with MPNST of the brachial plexus. The patient underwent gross total resection of the tumor, requiring sectioning of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus, as well as associated divisions. Following resection, sural nerve grafts were used to connect the C5 nerve root to the anterior division of the upper trunk and the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve, whereas a triceps branch of the radial nerve was coapted directly to the anterior division of the axillary nerve.

CONCLUSION

By 20 months after surgery, the patient had regained significant strength in her upper trunk distribution and demonstrated no evidence of tumor recurrence. Brachial plexus reconstruction offers a potentially valuable surgical adjunct to MPNST treatment.

Comparative analysis of posterior fusion constructs as treatments for middle and posterior column injuries: an in vitro biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND

Titanium pedicle screw-rod instrumentation is considered a standard treatment for spinal instability; however, the advantages of cobalt-chromium over titanium is generating interest in orthopedic practice. The aim of this study was to compare titanium versus cobalt-chromium rods in posterior fusion through in vitro biomechanical testing.

METHODS

Posterior and middle column injuries were simulated at L3-L5 in six cadaveric L1-S1 human spines and different pedicle screw constructs were implanted. Specimens were subjected to flexibility tests and range of motion, intradiscal pressure and axial rotation energy loss were statistically compared among five conditions: intact, titanium rods (with and without transverse connectors) and cobalt-chromium rods (with and without transverse connectors).

FINDINGS

All fusion constructs significantly (P<0.01) decreased range of motion in flexion-extension and lateral bending with respect to intact, but no significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in axial rotation among all conditions. Intradiscal pressure significantly increased (P≤0.01) after fusion, except for the cobalt-chrome conditions in extension (P≥0.06), and no significant differences (P>0.99) were found among fixation constructs. In terms of energy loss, differences became significant P≤0.05 between the cobalt-chrome with transverse connector condition with respect to the cobalt-chrome and titanium conditions.

INTERPRETATION

There is not enough evidence to support that the cobalt-chrome rods performed biomechanically different than the titanium rods. The inclusion of the transverse connector only increased stability for the cobalt-chromium construct in axial rotation.

Biomechanical analysis of different types of pedicle screw augmentation: a cadaveric and synthetic bone sample study of instrumented vertebral specimens

This study aims to determine the pull-out strength, stiffness and failure pull-out energy of cement-augmented, cannulated-fenestrated pedicle screws in an osteoporotic cadaveric thoracolumbar model, and to determine, using synthetic bone samples, the extraction torques of screws pre-filled with cement and those with cement injected through perforations. Radiographs and bone mineral density measurements from 32 fresh thoracolumbar vertebrae were used to define specimen quality. Axial pull-out strength of screws was determined through mechanical testing. Mechanical pull-out strength, stiffness and energy-to-failure ratio were recorded for cement-augmented and non-cement-augmented screws. Synthetic bone simulating a human spinal bone with severe osteoporosis was used to measure the maximum extraction torque. The pull-out strength and stiffness-to-failure ratio of cement pre-filled and cement-injected screws were significantly higher than the non-cement-augmented control group. However, the cement pre-filled and cement-injected groups did not differ significantly across these values (p=0.07). The cement pre-filled group had the highest failure pull-out energy, approximately 2.8 times greater than that of the cement-injected (p<0.001), and approximately 11.5 times greater than that of the control groups (p<0.001). In the axial pull-out test, the cement-injected group had a greater maximum extraction torque than the cement pre-filled group, but was statistically insignificant (p=0.17). The initial fixation strength of cannulated screws pre-filled with cement is similar to that of cannulated screws injected with cement through perforations. This comparable strength, along with the heightened pull-out energy and reduced extraction torque, indicates that pedicle screws pre-filled with cement are superior for bone fixation over pedicle screws injected with cement.

The influence of anatomy (normal versus scoliosis) on the free-hand placement of pedicle screws: Is misplacement more frequent in patients with anatomical deformity?

Study design: Retrospective prognostic study.

Objective: To evaluate whether patients with anatomical deformity due to scoliosis have a higher frequency of inaccurate pedicle screw insertion and related complications using the free-hand technique compared with those whose normal anatomy had been impacted by trauma.

Methods: Consecutively treated trauma patients with otherwise normal anatomy (48 patients instrumented with 291 screws, group A) and scoliosis patients (24 patients instrumented with 287 screws, group B) were evaluated. Screw position on CT was evaluated using the classification by Gertzbein and Robbins with modification by Karagoz Guzey. (See web appendix at www.aospine.org/ebsj for complete classification description.) Images were examined by two fellows and one junior staff member none of whom participated in patient management. Screw position was determined by consensus.

Results: In group A, five (1.7%) out of 289 screws were severely misplaced and 26 (9%) screws caused either medial (3.8%) or lateral (5.2%) cortical breeches. The other 258 (89.3%) screws were fully contained within the cortical boundaries of the pedicle. In group B, seven (2.8%) out of 256 screws were severely misplaced. Thirty-three (13%) screws caused cortical breeches, either medial (9%), lateral (2%), or anterior (2%), and 216 (84.3%) screws were fully contained within the cortical boundaries of the pedicle and the vertebra. Neurological complications were reported in one patient with scoliosis. No vascular complications were reported in either group.

Conclusions: The percentage of incorrectly placed screws was similar in both groups, trauma and deformity patients. The presence of vertebral anatomical changes related to adult scoliosis was not associated with an increase in the screw-related neurological or vascular complications.

Are Breech Rates for Pedicle Screws Higher in the Upper Thoracic Spine?

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate pedicle screw placement in pediatric patients with various etiologies of scoliosis, and to identify predictors of misplacement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Accuracy of placement of pedicle screws has not been well documented for posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion performed in the non-idiopathic population.

METHODS

A total of 54 patients (29 idiopathic, 16 neuromuscular, and 9 congenital/syndromic scoliosis), ages 5-19 years, were included. Computed tomography scans were obtained on patients postoperatively to assess screw position. Three pediatric orthopedic surgeons evaluated screw placement, and risk factors for misplacement were examined.

RESULTS

Of 1,042 pedicle screws, 8.3% were misplaced. Among all etiologies, screws placed at T1 (28.6%) and T2 (18.2%) had higher misplacement rates. T2 screws and curve correction greater than 75% had higher misplacement rates in congenital/syndromic patients; screws at T3, screws at upper end of construct, and proximal screws had significantly higher misplacement rates in neuromuscular patients; and no variables predicted misplacement in idiopathics. Screws placed at the most proximal end of the screw/rod construct also had a higher misplacement rate (14.1%) compared with all remaining levels (7.8%). Nonidiopathic patients had higher anterior misplacement compared with idiopathic. No screws were removed or revised, and no screw-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicle screw instrumentation in the thoracolumbar spine was safe for pediatric patients. We found that pedicle screws placed at top levels are at higher risk for misplacement among all pediatric scoliosis patients. Nonidiopathic patients are at higher risk for anterior screw misplacement, and the predictive effect of vertebral level is more profound in nonidiopathic patients. Because of these findings, we routinely use fluoroscopic guidance for the placement of T1 and T2 screws, and screws at the proximal end of construct.

Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons' interest in image and/or robotic guidance for spinal implant placement is increasing. This technology is continually improving and may be particularly useful in patients with challenging anatomy. Only through careful clinical evaluation can its successful applications, limitations, and areas for improvement be defined. This study evaluates the outcomes of robotic-assisted screw placement in a consecutive series of 102 patients.

METHODS

Data were recorded from technical notes and operative records created immediately following each surgery case, in which the robotic system was used to guide pedicle screw placement. All cases were performed at the same hospital by a single surgeon. The majority of patients had spinal deformity and/or previous spine surgery. Each planned screw placement was classified as: (1) successful/accurately placed screw using robotic guidance; (2) screw malpositioned using robot; (3) use of robot aborted and screw placed manually; (4) planned screw not placed as screw deemed non essential for construct stability. Data from each case were reviewed by two independent researchers to indentify the diagnosis, number of attempted robotic guided screw placements and the outcome of the attempted placement as well as complications or reasons for non-placement.

RESULTS

Robotic-guided screw placement was successfully used in 95 out of 102 patients. In those 95 patients, 949 screws (87.5 % of 1,085 planned screws) were successfully implanted. Eleven screws (1.0 %) placed using the robotic system were misplaced (all presumably due to "skiving" of the drill bit or trocar off the side of the facet). Robotic guidance was aborted and 110 screws (10.1 %) were manually placed, generally due to poor registration and/or technical trajectory issues. Fifteen screws (1.4 %) were not placed after intraoperative determination that the screw was not essential for construct stability. The robot was not used as planned in seven patients, one due to severe deformity, one due to very high body mass index, one due to extremely poor bone quality, one due to registration difficulty caused by previously placed loosened hardware, one due to difficulty with platform mounting and two due to device technical issues.

CONCLUSION

Of the 960 screws that were implanted using the robot, 949 (98.9 %) were successfully and accurately implanted and 11 (1.1 %) were malpositioned, despite the fact that the majority of patients had significant spinal deformities and/or previous spine surgeries. "Tool skiving" was thought to be the inciting issue with the misplaced screws. Intraoperative anteroposterior and oblique fluoroscopic imaging for registration is critical and was the limiting issue in four of the seven aborted cases.

Efficacy analysis of pedicle screw internal fixation of fractured vertebrae in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures

The present study aimed to discuss the method and effect of posterior internal fixation of thoracolumbar fractures strengthened by the vertical stress pedicle screw fixation of fractured vertebrae. Patients with single thoracolumbar fractures were examined retrospectively. Fourteen patients (group A) had been treated with vertical stress pedicle screw fixation of a fractured vertebra and sixteen patients (group B) received traditional double-plate fixation, as a control. All patients were diagnosed with fresh fractures with a complete unilateral or bilateral pedicle and no explosion of the inferior half of the vertebral body or inferior endplate. In group A, patients received conventional posterior distraction and lumbar lordosis restoration, as well as pedicle screws in the fractured vertebra in a vertical direction to relieve stress to achieve a local stress balance. All patients were followed up postoperatively for 4-18 months (average, 12.6 months). The vertical stress pedicle screw fixation assisted in the reduction of vertebrae fracture, which reduced the postoperative Cobb's angle loss. There was a significant difference in the change of Cobb's angle between the two groups one year after surgery (P<0.01). Conditional application of pedicle screws in a single thoracolumbar fracture enhances the stability of the internal fixation system and is conducive to the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of the corrective effects.

Surgeon's view of pedicle screw implantation for the monitoring neurophysiologist

Pedicle screws have become the gold standard of spinal instrumentation over the past decade owing to their biomechanical superiority. Despite their advantages, pedicle screw instrumentation is potentially dangerous, and surgeons wish to improve accuracy of screw placement to avoid complications associated with screw misplacement. The anatomy of the pedicles is variable throughout the spine, and several landmarks and trajectories have been suggested to aid safe placement of pedicle screws in the spine. Several techniques such as x-ray and computed tomography scan imaging coupled with computer-aided navigation are available to improve accuracy of screw insertion. Intraoperative neuromonitoring with the help of triggered electromyographic recordings has evolved as an objective evidence of assessing pedicle breach and proximity of the screw to neural structures. While all imaging and electrophysiological modalities should be applied on an individualized basis, finally no adjunctive technique can fully replace the need for surgical expertise and experience.

Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Spinal instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) aims to correct spinal deformity and maintain long-term spinal stability until bony healing is ensured. The purpose of this study was to compare the minimum 2-year postoperative radiographic and clinical results of posterior spine correction and fusion with all-hook instrumentation versus hybrid segmental instrumentation versus pedicle screw instrumentation for AIS from a single institution.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients with AIS who underwent a posterior spinal fusion with segmental pedicle screw (35), hook (35), or hybrid (35) instrumentation were sorted and matched according to the following criteria: similar age at surgery, identical Lenke curve types, curve magnitude, and Risser grade. Patients were evaluated before, immediately after, and at 2 years after surgery for radiographic parameters, complications, and outcome, as well as on the basis of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The age and Risser grade, major curve Cobb angle, apical vertebral rotation (AVR), apical vertebral translation (AVT), lowest instrumented vertebral tilt, global coronal and sagittal balance, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis were determined as part of preoperative evaluation. All 3 groups showed significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative major curve Cobb angle, lowest instrumented vertebral tilt, AVT, and AVR. At the latest follow-up, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and global coronal and sagittal balance remained similar among the 3 groups. Major curve Cobb angle, AVT, and AVR were significantly different--the hook group's measurements were significantly higher than the other groups, but there was no difference between the pedicle screw and hybrid groups. Major curve correction rate was significantly different among all groups (screw=71.9%±13.8%, hybrid=61.4%±16.6%, hook=48.1%±19.7%) (P<0.001). The pedicle screw group had the least amount of correction loss but there was no statistically significant difference between groups (screw=2.6±6.7 degrees, hybrid=4.5±7.4 degrees, hook=4.4±6.2 degrees) (P=0.35). The hook group had the least amount of AVT correction, but the screw group and the hybrid groups were similar (pedicle=67.3%±15.5%, hybrid=57.5%±22.4%, hook=39.9%±32.5%) (P<0.001). Surgery time and blood loss were higher in the screw group. No differences in global SRS-22 scores were demonstrated between the patients treated with pedicle screw, hybrid, and hook constructs; however, the satisfaction domain was higher in the screw group at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicle screw and hybrid instrumentations offer significantly better spinal deformity correction than hook constructs in major curve coronal correction, AVT, and AVR. Patients with pedicle screw instrumentation had the greatest curve correction percentage, maintenance of this correction in the coronal and sagittal planes, and higher patient satisfaction by the SRS outcome scores. Global SRS-22 scores were similar at 2-year follow-up in all groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III retrospective comparative study.

Imaging features of postoperative complications after spinal surgery and instrumentation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to illustrate common postoperative complications and their imaging appearances after spinal surgery, including stabilization, fusion, and disk replacement with various techniques and devices.

CONCLUSION

Radiography is the primary modality for routine follow-up, but MDCT has become the standard for optimized assessment of postoperative implants, and MRI plays a major role in the diagnosis of complications such as infection and soft-tissue lesions.

Shape Memory Alloy Expandable Pedicle Screw to Enhance Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone: Primary Design and Finite Element Simulation

The properties of shape memory alloys, specifically the equiatomic intermetallic NiTi, are unique and significant in that they offer simple and effective solutions for some of the biomechanical issues encountered in orthopedics. Pedicle screws, used as an anchoring point for the implantation of spinal instrumentations in the spinal fracture and deformity treatments, entail the major drawback of loosening and backing out in osteoporotic bone. The strength of the screw contact with the surrounding bone diminishes as the bone degrades due to osteoporosis. The SMArtTM pedicle screw design is developed to address the existing issue in degraded bone. It is based on the interaction of bi-stable shape memory-superelastic elements. The bi-stable assembly acts antagonistically and consists of an external superelastic tube that expands the design protrusions when body temperature is attained; also an internal shape memory wire, inserted into the tube, retracts the assembly while locally heated to above the body temperature. This innovative bi-stable solution augments the pull-out resistance while still allowing for screw removal. The antagonistic wire-tube assembly was evaluated and parametrically analyzed as for the interaction of the superelastic tube and shape memory wire using a finite element model developed in COMSOL Multiphysics®. The outcomes of the simulation suggest that shape memory NiTi inserts on the SMArtTM pedicle screw can achieve the desired antagonistic functionality of expansion and retraction. Consequently, a parametric analysis was conducted over the effect of different sizes of wires and tubes. The dimensions for the first sample of this innovative pedicle screw were determined based on the results of this analysis.

Single incision percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) offers some of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. However, an additional skin incision is necessary in order to gain these advantages. The author recently performed a modified PPSF through a single skin incision and it yielded good results. Here, we report the single incision percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (SIPPSF).

METHODS

The medical records of 51 patients who underwent single segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with pedicle screw fixation (PSF) between December 2009 and December 2011 were reviewed. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the PSF technique used; conventional group (Group C), SIPPSF (Group S) and PPSF through multiple skin incisions (Group M). Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL) and pain intensity before and after the operation using a numeric rating scale (NRS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The number of patients in Group S, Group C and Group M was 25, 17 and 9, respectively. The NRS demonstrated a reduction in pain intensity in all the patients, and there were no differences in NRS scoring between the three groups. Group S showed a reduction in the EBL compared to Group C (p=0.001) and a reduction in the operation time compared to Group M(p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

The author supposes that the type of skin incision does not correlate significantly with the clinical results of TLIF with PPSF. However, it can be considered that SIPPSF offers the advantage of avoiding an additional paramedian skin incision.

Comparative analysis of adjacent levels of degeneration and clinical outcomes between conventional pedicle screws and percutaneous pedicle screws in treatment of degenerative disease at l3-5; a preliminary report

Objective

This study was conducted to compare radiologic changes and clinical outcomes in adjacent level of percutaneous pedicle screws with those of conventional (open) pedicle screws.

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2009, 51 patients underwent L3-5 decompression and spinal fusion. Percutaneous pedicle screws were used in 22 patients, and open pedicle screws were used in the remaining patients. For estimation of instability, we performed measurements of change in the lordotic and adjacent segment angles. A retrospective evaluation of the patients' data and several assessment scales was conducted for determination of clinical outcomes.

Results

The radiological examinations revealed no significant differences, except the L2-3 sagittal angle change. The upper adjacent level angle change in the open group was larger than that in the percutaneous group. In the percutaneous group, the sagittal angle changed from 9.7±3.0° to 11.25±3.6° during the follow-up periods, and in the open group, the sagittal angle changed from 10.8±4.1° to 13.6±4.5°. Radiological instability was observed in 5 patients (17%) in the open group and in 2 patients (9%) in the percutaneous group. Both groups showed similar clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

We suggest that open screws have a greater tendency to cause degenerative change in the upper segment than percutaneous screws. This may be because percutaneous screw fixation causes minimal injury to supporting structures and preserves adjacent facet joints.

Screws versus hooks: implant cost and deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costs of two spinal implants-hook and hybrid constructs and pedicle screw constructs-in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) as they relate to intraoperative deformity correction.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD

This retrospective study examined 50 patients with AIS who were treated with posterior spinal fusion using segmental hook-hybrid constructs (23) or pedicle screws (27). Radiographic parameters measured on immediate preoperative and initial standing postoperative scoliosis films were the coronal Cobb angles of the upper thoracic, middle thoracic, lumbar, and instrumented curves; global coronal and sagittal balance; thoracic kyphosis; lumbar lordosis; and type and number of implants used. Current implant cost data were obtained from three major spinal implant manufacturers to determine the total cost of the constructs, cost per degree of correction, cost per level fused, and cost per degree of correction of the major curve.

RESULTS

After surgery, the average percentage of correction for the middle thoracic curve or major curve was 57 % in the hook-hybrid group compared to 73 % in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001). The average amount of correction of the major curve was 31.1° in the hook-hybrid group compared to 42.7° in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001). The average number of fused levels was 10.7 in the hook-hybrid group compared to 12.2 in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001). The average number of implants was 14.8 in the hook-hybrid group compared to 23.3 in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001). The average total cost of implants was $11,248 in the hook-hybrid group compared to $22,826 in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001), and the average cost per fused level was $1,058 in the hook-hybrid group compared to $1,878 in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001). The average cost per degree of correction of the major curve was $415 in the hook-hybrid group compared to $559 in the pedicle screw group (P = 0.0014). The global coronal balance, global sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screw instrumentation was shown to be more expensive overall, per fused level, and per degree of correction. Also, more implants were used and more levels were fused in the pedicle screw group than in the hook-hybrid group. Pedicle screws showed a statistically significantly greater percentage of correction of the major curve. Physicians must evaluate each patient individually and determine if the increased percentage of correction warrants the increased cost for pedicle screw constructs.

Evaluation of thoracic pedicle morphometry in a Chinese population using 3D reformatted CT

The aim of this study was to investigate the detailed three-dimensional morphology of the pedicles from T1 to T12 in 120 Chinese patients using a light-speed Vct CT (General Electric). After reformatting the original images, the following parameters were studied: outer pedicle width (OPW), outer pedicle height (OPH), pedicle chord length (PCL), pedicle cortical thickness (PCT) of the isthmus, and transverse pedicle angle (TPA). The mean outer pedicle width, outer pedicle height, and pedicle chord length were significantly smaller in females than in males at all levels (P < 0.01). The percentage of outer pedicle width ≤ 5.0 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm was high at mid-thoracic pedicles. No significant differences were found in transverse pedicle angle and pedicle cortical thickness in males and females. Pedicle cortical thickness was significantly thinner in patients over 50 years old compared with patients below 50 years old at most levels. The results showed that a screw of larger than 4.5 mm would be too large for mid-thoracic segments in Chinese population, especially for female patients. Considering the amount of variation between individuals and the complicated structure of the thoracic pedicles, the use of the transpedicular screw fixation must be individualized for each patient and based on detailed preoperative assessment. Reformatted CT assessment is essential before this procedure is performed.

Application of intraoperative computed tomography with or without navigation system in surgical correction of spinal deformity: a preliminary result of 59 consecutive human cases

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery by the assistance of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) with or without navigation system.

OBJECTIVE

To share our preliminary experience and analysis of the iCT navigation system applied to spinal deformity surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The iCT navigation system has been shown to improve accuracy and safety in posterior instrumentation. It not only decreased the operation time but also prevented excessive radiation exposure to the medical staff. To date, there are only few reports about the application of the iCT navigation system in spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

From April 2009 to September 2010, 59 patients who had a diagnosis of scoliosis, kyphosis, or scoliokyphosis and underwent iCT-assisted surgical correction were included. Without randomization, 28 patients were operated with the iCT-navigation system, and the other 31 patients were operated with standard procedure under iCT assistance. The detailed procedures, preoperative and intraoperative images were illustrated. The accuracy of screw placement, time for screw insertion, postoperative correction rate, and iCT scanning data were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between 2 groups in (1) the preoperative Cobb angle (76.2° and 62.6° in the navigation and non-navigation groups), (2) the accuracy and the revision rate of thoracic pedicle screws and total pedicle screws, and (3) the average screw insertion time. The breach rate and the revision rate of thoracic pedicle screws and total pedicle screws were significantly lower and the average screw insertion time was significantly lesser in the navigation group than in the non-navigation group. There were no statistically significant difference in (1) the breach rate and the revision rate of lumbar pedicle screws, (2) the mean iCT scanning time and time-out, (3) the mean number of fusion segments, (4) the mean number of iCT scans, and (5) the postoperative correction rate. Complications were encountered in 2 patients in the non-navigation group but none in the navigation group. There was no reoperation due to implant malposition in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The iCT navigation system provides desirable accuracy of posterior spinal instrumentation for patients during surgical correction of spinal deformity without radiation exposure to the medical staff, especially in thoracic spine instrumentation. Meanwhile, the iCT in itself is an effective means of assessing complex instrumentation of the spinal deformity.

Computed tomography-guided navigation of thoracic pedicle screws for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in more accurate placement and less screw removal

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of computed tomography-guided navigation (CTGN) of thoracic pedicle screw placement in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement and frequency of intraoperative removal using CTGN versus conventional freehand technique in AIS.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Even in experienced hands, more than 10% of the thoracic pedicle screws are misplaced. CTGN may improve accuracy and safety, but there is little published data on its efficacy.

METHODS

We reviewed intraoperative computed tomographic images in a consecutive series of AIS cases undergoing posterior fusion during a 1-year period. Three types of screws were identified: an optimal screw--the central axis is in the plane and axis of the pedicle with the tip completely within the vertebral body; an acceptable screw--the majority of its shank is outside the central axis of the pedicle, but not potentially unsafe; and a potentially unsafe screw--(1) the central axis of the screw traversed the canal, (2) left anterior/lateral vertebral body perforation, risking the aorta, or (3) any screw repositioned or removed after the postimplant computed tomography.

RESULTS

In 42 patients, 485 screws were evaluable with a visible pedicle and screw (300 navigated and 185 non-navigated). Screws were classified as follows: optimal screws, 74% CTGN versus 42% non-navigated; acceptable screws, 23% CTGN versus 49% non-navigated; and potentially unsafe, 3% CTGN versus 9% non-navigated (P < 0.001). A potentially unsafe screw was 3.8 times less likely to be inserted with navigation (P = 0.003). The odds of a significant medial breach were 7.6 times higher without navigation (P < 0.001). A screw was 8.3 times more likely to be removed intraoperatively in the non-navigated cohort (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

CTGN resulted in more optimally placed thoracic pedicle screws, fewer potentially unsafe screws, and fewer screw removals.

Short-term clinical observation of the Dynesys neutralization system for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar vertebrae

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and short-term efficacy of the posterior approach of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system for degenerative disease of the lumbar vertebrae.

METHODS

  From March 2008 to March 2010, 32 cases of degenerative lumbar vertebral disease, 19 men and 13 women, (mean age 58 ± 5.2, range, 43-78 years), were treated with posterior laminectomy and Dynesys internal fixation. All patients had a history of over 3 months waist or leg pain that had not been relieved by conservative treatment. There were 10 cases of single lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion, 14 of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, 5 of degenerative lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis, and 3 of recurrent lumbar disc protrusion after surgery. A visual analogue score (VAS) was used for pain assessment, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) for functional evaluation of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 6-23 months (mean, 16.4 ± 5.5 months). Forty-one segments in 32 patients were stabilized; 23 cases (71.9%) underwent single-segmental stabilization, and 9 (28.1%) two-segmental stabilization. VAS of leg pain, root and low back pain was significantly improved postoperatively. The ODI improved from preoperative 69% ± 12.6% to postoperative 28% ± 15.7% (P < 0.001). On the stabilized segment and adjacent segments above and below, the range of movement showed no statistical difference; no loosening of screws, cord and polyester spacer occurred.

CONCLUSION

  The Dynesys dynamic neutralization system combined with decompression can achieve satisfactory short-term clinical results in lumbar degenerative disease. This procedure system not only reduces back and leg pain, but also preserves the mobility of fixed segments, minimizes tissue injury and avoids taking bone for spinal fusion.

The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images for the assessment of pedicle screw postion

STUDY DESIGN

Human cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position using open dissection as the gold standard.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screws are widely used in the treatment of various spinal disorders. Postoperative computed tomographic scans are the imaging gold standard to detect pedicle screw malposition. However, a second procedure is necessary if such malpositioned screws have to be revised. The O-arm is an intraoperative scanner that allows revision of a screw without having to return the patient to the operating room for a separate procedure. No previous studies have looked at the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position.

METHODS

This factorial validation study utilized 9 cadavers in a comparison of intraoperative O-arm images and the dissection gold standard. Four hundred sixteen screws were inserted using 3-dimensional image (O-arm) guidance from C2 to S1. The screw positions were randomized into 3 groups: "IN" (fully contained within the pedicle), "OUT-lateral," or "OUT-medial." After screw insertion, O-arm images were obtained and reviewed in a blinded fashion by 3 independent observers. Dissection identified the true position of the screws. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using dissection results as the gold standard. The interobserver reliability was also determined.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of O-arm images for the thoracic and lumbar spine were 73%, 76%, 71%, 74%, and 72%, respectively. Accuracy of surgeon perception in the cervical spine was significantly less than in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. There was substantial interobserver agreement between the 3 readers.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative O-arm images accurately detect significant pedicle screw violations in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine but are less accurate for the cervical spine.

CT evaluation of upper thoracic spine for surgical application of transarticular screw placement

INTRODUCTION

Although pedicle screw fixation has been increasingly used in the upper thoracic spine in recent years, controversies exist about the safety and complications such as nerve or vascular intrusion associated with the technique. In this study, an alternative method of transarticular screw fixation was validated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Morphometric analysis was performed on computed tomography (CT) scans of the upper thoracic zygapophysial joints of C7, T1, T2 and T3 in 20 male and 20 female patients in the axial and sagittal planes. The degree of screw angulation was recorded in the sagittal and axial planes and the screw length was measured at the spinal level from C7 to T3.

RESULTS

The smallest medial-lateral diameter and anterior-posterior diameter of IAP was found at T3 in the female patients and C7 in the male patients. The screw trajectory length ranged from 14.9 to 20.5 mm in all patients. All the above measurements were significantly different between male and female patients at all levels (P < 0.05). The mean value of screw trajectory angle was 19.3°-20.1° in the axial plane and 44.3°-45.7° in the sagittal plane. There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between male and female patients in the axial and sagittal angles.

CONCLUSION

The morphometric data of C7-T3 zygapophysial joints indicate the suitable screw diameter and screw length for this technique. Transarticular screw fixation proved to be a potentially safe alternative to pedicle screw fixation in this region.

Thoracic pedicle morphometry in different body height population: a three-dimensional study using reformatted computed tomography

STUDY DESIGN

A three-dimensional study of the thoracic pedicle (T1-T12) morphometry in Chinese patients with different body height, using reformatted computed tomography (CT).

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the dimensions of the thoracic pedicles and to analyze the relationship between body height and thoracic pedicle parameters.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The thoracic pedicle morphometry has been studied extensively in different populations using various techniques. Previous studies have shown a significantly smaller size of the thoracic pedicles in women than in men and in Asians than in Caucasians. Some authors postulated that it is the body height that contributes to the variation in the pedicle size. To our knowledge, however, no study has specifically analyzed the relationship between body height and thoracic pedicle parameters in detail.

METHODS

In this study, T1 to T12 vertebrae were imaged in 126 Chinese patients by a Lightspeed Vct CT (General Electric, Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA). After reformatting the original images, the following parameters were calculated: outer pedicle width, outer pedicle height and pedicle cortical thickness of the pedicle isthmus, pedicle length, and transverse pedicle angle. All measured data were statistically analyzed by the independent t test and Pearson correlation test using SPSS software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

The thoracic pedicle parameters were significantly smaller in women than in men except for the transverse pedicle angles and the pedicle cortical thickness. The percentage of outer pedicle widths less than 4.5 mm was extremely high at T3 to T9 in females and T4 to T7 in males. There was a much higher percentage of pedicle width of 4.5 mm or lesser, 4.0 mm or lesser, and 3.5 mm or lesser when body height was less than 160 cm. Body height is probably one of the main factors that contribute to the variation in pedicle size since a significant positive correlation was observed between pedicle size and body height.

CONCLUSION

Body height is probably one of the main factors that contribute to the variation in pedicle size among different ethnic and sex groups. Transpedicular procedures using a 4.5-mm screw may not be applicable to much of the Chinese population at the upper and middle thoracic segments, especially for patients less than 160 cm in height. A reformatted CT evaluation is routinely recommended not only for choosing the proper screw but also for determining the feasibility of a true transpedicular procedure.

Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques

INTRODUCTION

With the advances and improvement of computer-assisted surgery devices, computer-guided pedicle screws insertion has been applied to the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review of all available prospective evidence regarding pedicle screw insertion techniques in the thoracic and lumbar human spine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We considered all prospective in vivo clinical studies in the English literature that assessed the results of different pedicle screw placement techniques (free-hand technique, fluoroscopy guided, computed tomography (CT)-based navigation, fluoro-based navigation). MEDLINE, OVID, and Springer databases were used for the literature search covering the period from January 1950 until May 2010.

RESULTS

26 prospective clinical studies were eventually included in the analysis. These studies included in total 1,105 patients in which 6,617 screws were inserted. In the studies using free-hand technique, the percentage of the screws fully contained in the pedicle ranged from 69 to 94%, with the aid of fluoroscopy from 28 to 85%, using CT navigation from 89 to 100% and using fluoroscopy-based navigation from 81 to 92%. The screws positioned with free-hand technique tended to perforate the cortex medially, whereas the screws placed with CT navigation guidance seemed to perforate more often laterally.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, navigation does indeed exhibit higher accuracy and increased safety in pedicle screw placement than free-hand technique and use of fluoroscopy.

Role of 'low cost Indian implants' in our practice: our experience with 1,572 pedicle screws

PURPOSE

As Indian spine surgeons, we have to choose between 'foreign implants' and 'Indian implants'. An Indian four pedicle screw rod construct costs 330 US dollars (one-third that of a similar foreign construct). About 60% of patients cannot afford expensive foreign implants. There is little written data evaluating how these Indian implants fare. The purpose of our study was to evaluate implant failure rate with Indian implants and compare it to foreign implants.

METHODS

We analysed results of 1,572 titanium pedicle screws used in 239 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients were divided into Indian and foreign implant groups. Radiological failures were classified as (1) surgery and disease failure, (2) bone failure and (3) implant failure. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference between implant failure rate for Indian and foreign implants.

RESULTS

A total of 128 (53.56%) of patients could not afford foreign implants. We used 679 foreign and 893 Indian pedicle screws. In foreign implant group, there was a single incident of implant failure (0.15%). In Indian implant group, there were five such incidents (0.56%).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Rate of failure for 'low cost' Indian implants is very low (approximately 1 implant complication for every 200 screws). (2) There is no statistically significant difference in failure rates for Indian implants and foreign implants (P-value = 0.2438). We recommend that Indian implants are a safe and viable option to make spine surgery cost effective in the Indian scenario.

Computed tomographic evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in idiopathic scoliosis

This retrospective observational study aimed to determine the accuracy of the placement of transpedicular thoracic screws used in idiopathic scoliosis and to evaluate the position and safety of the implants using postoperative computed tomography. Twenty-nine patients who underwent surgery for scoliosis between May 2003 and November 2005 were included in this study. The mean spinal curvature was 67°, and all of the patients had thoracic screws or hooks implanted. The positioning of 78 pedicle screws was evaluated using computed tomography after the free-handed technique was performed. The mean spinal curvature after surgery was 29°. Seventy-six percent of the screws were fully contained within the pedicle. Twenty-one screws breached the pedicle by between 2 and 4 mm (three medially and 18 laterally). Two screws were broken. A neurological deficit was identified in one case after surgery, but the deficit was reversed after the removal of the screws. This screw had a medial breach of greater than 4 mm. Most screws were inserted between the cortical vertebrae. Misplaced screws were most commonly inserted with a lateral cortical perforation.

Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

We retrospectively evaluated 488 percutaneous pedicle screws in 110 consecutive patients that had undergone minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) to determine the incidence of pedicle screw misplacement and its relevant risk factors. Screw placements were classified based on postoperative computed tomographic findings as "correct", "cortical encroachment" or as "frank penetration". Age, gender, body mass index, bone mineral density, diagnosis, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), level of fusion, surgeon's position, spinal alignment, quality/quantity of multifidus muscle, and depth to screw entry point were considered to be demographic and anatomical variables capable of affecting pedicle screw placement. Pedicle dimensions, facet joint arthritis, screw location (ipsilateral or contralateral), screw length, screw diameter, and screw trajectory angle were regarded as screw-related variables. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine relations between these variables and the correctness of screw placement. The incidence of cortical encroachment was 12.5% (61 screws), and frank penetration was found for 54 (11.1%) screws. Two patients (0.4%) with medial penetration underwent revision for unbearable radicular pain and foot drop, respectively. The odds ratios of significant risk factors for pedicle screw misplacement were 3.373 (95% CI 1.095-10.391) for obesity, 1.141 (95% CI 1.024-1.271) for pedicle convergent angle, 1.013 (95% CI 1.006-1.065) for EBL >400 cc, and 1.003 (95% CI 1.000-1.006) for cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle. Although percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws was performed safely during MITLIF, several risk factors should be considered to improve placement accuracy.

Validity of surgeon perception of navigated pedicle screw position: a cadaveric study

STUDY DESIGN

Human Cadaveric Experimental Study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the validity of surgeon perception of pedicle screw position inserted using intraoperative three-dimensional (O-arm) image-guided screw insertion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A surgeon's ability to detect pedicle wall violations intraoperatively is crucial for optimal pedicle screw placement. Accuracy of use of a probe or sound to assess pedicle breach is not optimal and may require experience. Intraoperative navigation has been shown to improve screw placement accuracy. It has not been shown, however, whether navigation in combination with screw tract palpation can further increase the surgeon's ability to detect a pedicle breach in pedicle screw placement in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine.

METHODS

Four hundred eighteen screws were inserted using three-dimensional image guidance transpedicularly from C2 to S1 in 10 fresh frozen cadavers. Screw tracts were created using navigation and then probed. After probing, the surgeon stated whether he perceived that the screw would be in, out laterally, or out medially. After screw insertion for all the levels, open dissection was then performed to determine the actual pedicle screw position. The surgeon's perception of screw position was compared to the dissection results.

RESULTS

The overall specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the surgeon perception of pedicle screw position were 87%, 80%, 78% and 88%, respectively. Accuracy of surgeon perception of pedicle screw position was significantly less than in the cervical spine when compared with thoracic and lumbosacral spine.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon perception of a navigated pedicle screw position is accurate in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Detection of pedicle screw violations by surgeon perception in the cervical spine is less accurate and does not reliably lead to accurate screw placement.

Role of rod diameter in comparison between only screws versus hooks and screws in posterior instrumentation of thoracic curve in idiopathic scoliosis

Since the introduction of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in 1984, the correction techniques in scoliosis surgery have changed from Harrington principles of concave distraction to segmental realignment to a variety of possibilities including the rod rotation manoeuvres, and to segmental approximation via cantilever methods. Additionally, pedicle screw utilization in lumbar curves enhanced correction and stabilization of various deformities, and various studies have strongly supported the clinical advantages of lumbar pedicle screws versus conventional hook instrumentation. Pedicle screw constructs have become increasingly popular in the treatment of patients with spinal deformity. When applied to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients, pedicle screw fixation has demonstrated increased corrective ability compared with traditional hook/hybrid instrumentation. In our study, we do a retrospective review of idiopathic scoliosis patients (King 2-Lenke 1 B/C) treated with a selective thoracic posterior fusion using an all-screw construct versus a hybrid (pedicle screws and hooks) construct and, compare the percentage of correction of the scoliotic curves obtained with screws alone and screws and hooks. Special attention was given to the rod diameter and correction technique. Our results show that the percentage of correction of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis is similar when treating the scoliosis with rods and screws alone or with rods, screws and hooks; therefore, we and the majority of authors in the literature do not consider the rod section. This can be an important parameter in the evaluation of the superiority of treatment with screws only or screws and hooks. In our study, even if not of statistical significance, the better thoracic curve correction obtained with the hybrid group should be ascribed to the fact that in this group mostly 6 mm rods were used.

Minimally invasive percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation: increased accuracy and reduced radiation exposure by means of a novel electromagnetic navigation system

Background

Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation methods may increase the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy, resulting in excessive radiation exposure for the patient, surgeon, and support staff. Electromagnetic field (EMF)-based navigation may aid more accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws while reducing fluoroscopic exposure. We compared the accuracy, time of insertion, and radiation exposure of EMF with traditional fluoroscopic percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Methods

Minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in T8 to S1 pedicles of eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric torsos was guided with EMF or standard fluoroscopy. Set-up, insertion, and fluoroscopic times and radiation exposure and accuracy (measured with post-procedural computed tomography) were analyzed in each group.

Results

Sixty-two pedicle screws were placed under fluoroscopic guidance and 60 under EMF guidance. Ideal trajectories were achieved more frequently with EMF over all segments (62.7% vs. 40%; p = 0.01). Greatest EMF accuracy was achieved in the lumbar spine, with significant improvements in both ideal trajectory and reduction of pedicle breaches over fluoroscopically guided placement (64.9% vs. 40%, p = 0.03, and 16.2% vs. 42.5%, p = 0.01, respectively). Fluoroscopy time was reduced 77% with the use of EMF (22 s vs. 5 s per level; p < 0.0001) over all spinal segments. Radiation exposure at the hand and body was reduced 60% (p = 0.058) and 32% (p = 0.073), respectively. Time for insertion did not vary between the two techniques.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive pedicle screw placement with the aid of EMF image guidance reduces fluoroscopy time and increases placement accuracy when compared with traditional fluoroscopic guidance while adding no additional time to the procedure.

Outcome of single level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion using corticocancellous laminectomy bone chips

BACKGROUND

Interbody fusion surgery has been considered by many to be a treatment of choice for instability in lumbar degenerative disc disease. A posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has the advantages of spinal canal decompression, anterior column reconstruction, and reduction of the sagittal slips from a single posterior approach. The PLIF using double cage was a standard practice till many studies reported comparable results and lesser complications with single cage. Iliac crest was considered as an appropriate source of bone graft until comparable spinal fusion rates using local bone graft and cage emerged. Till date, there has been no report of corticocancellous laminectomy bone chips alone being used for spinal fusion. In this paper, we present radiologic results of single level instrumented PLIF, where in only corticocancellous laminectomy bone chips were used as a fusion device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is a retrospective cohort study of 35 consecutive patients, who underwent single level instrumented PLIF surgery, wherein only locally obtained bone chips was used for spinal fusion. The average follow-up was 26 months. The indications for the surgery were as follows: 19 patients had disc herniations, with back pain of instability type, normal disc height on radiology. Ten patients had grade 1 spondylolisthesis, with significant back pain and translational instability on radiography. Three patients were redo spine surgeries, and three patients had healed spondylodiscitis with significant back pain and instability. All patients were regularly followed up and decision of spinal fusion or no fusion was taken at 2 years using modified criteria of Lee.

RESULTS

Of total 35 patients, there were 24 males and 11 females, with a mean age of 41 years. There were 16 patients with definitive fusion, 15 patients with probable fusion, 04 patients with possible pseudoarthrosis, and no patient had definitive pseudoarthrosis. The mean time for fusion to occur was 18 months. The average loss of disc height, over 2 year follow up, was only 3 mm in 8 patients. Three patients had a localized kyphosis of more than 3° at the fusion level. The average blood loss was 356 ml and average operating time was 150 min.

CONCLUSION

Corticocancellous laminectomy bone chips alone can be used as a means of spinal fusion in patients with single level instrumented PLIF. This has got a good fusion rate.

Estudo de acurácia em cirurgia assistida por navegação na revisão cirúrgica de deformidade vertebral

OBJETIVO: Avaliar as vantagens da cirurgia com navegação na revisão cirúrgica de deformidades vertebrais, verificando a acurácia deste método. MÉTODO: Foram revisados cincos pacientes com deformidades vertebrais que tiveram intercorrências na primeira cirurgia. Esses pacientes foram submetidos a um estudo de tomografia computadorizada (TC) com cortes de 2mm da coluna vertebral antes da segunda cirurgia. Nos cinco pacientes submetidos a reabordagem cirúrgica procedeu-se a instrumentação posterior com auxílio da navegação. Foram 84 parafusos pediculares implantados, sendo que 33 destes parafusos foram assistidos por computação. A navegação foi empregada nos níveis da deformidade vertebral onde a anatomia apresentava-se alterada inviabilizando o correto uso dos parâmetros anatômicos para inserção de parafusos pediculares. Nos demais níveis onde era possível a correta identificação desses parâmetros anatômicos foi utilizada a técnica padrão. A TC pós-operatória foi realizada para aferição do posicionamento dos parafusos pediculares. Avaliamos os resultados obtidos no posicionamento com e sem o uso da navegação. O tempo de fluoroscopia e o tempo da cirurgia também foram comparados com o padrão ouro da literatura. RESULTADOS: Dos 33 parafusos implantados com navegação observou-se uma acurácia de 94%, com uma taxa de violação pedicular de 6%. CONCLUSÕES: O uso da navegação é importante nas revisões cirúrgicas das deformidades vertebrais com anatomia alterada, influenciando no bom resultado final da cirurgia.

Systematic review of cervical pedicle dimensions and projections

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted specifically looking at studies reporting linear dimension and angular projection data on the anatomy of the cervical pedicle (C1-C7) via radiography or direct measurement.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report a more accurate set of dimension data and identify differences based on race and gender, increasing the sample size by aggregating similar data of prior studies measuring the cervical pedicle in Asian, European/American, male, and female populations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A wide variation in the reports of the dimensions and projections of the cervical pedicle exist partly due to the uniqueness of this structure as well as the effects of small sample sizes and variable races and genders of sample populations of previous studies.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was executed, and identified articles were reviewed. A comprehensive database was constructed for synthesis of the identified studies. Subgroups were determined based on the type of population (race, gender, location of study) and radiographic or direct cadaveric measurement. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze and compare these subgroups including: means, standard deviations, and Student t test with the Bonferroni adjustment.

RESULTS

In total, the current study reports on 33 studies with the measurements of 1311 partial and complete cervical spines. At a 95% confidence interval statistically significant differences between races were found only at C3 and C4 levels in the pedicle axis length. Male-to-female significant differences existed only at the pedicle axis length of C5 in the Asian population, while sex differences existed in the outer pedicle width and height of C3, C4, C5, C6, and C7 in the European/American population.

CONCLUSION

The current study has found that there is no statistical difference in measuring the cervical pedicle via radiography (CT) or directly. There are more significant differences comparing the cervical pedicles of males and females in the European/American population than exists in the Asian population (specifically in pedicle width and height). There are also significant differences at C3 and C4 cervical pedicle between the Asian and European/American population (specifically in the pedicle axis length and transverse angle).

Thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asian cadaveric specimen: does radiological pedicle profile affect outcome?

PURPOSE

Pedicle screw instrumentation has superior biomechanical as well as clinical outcome. Thoracic pedicles show great variation in different population groups, particularly in Asians who have been shown to have smaller pedicle dimensions. Although plain radiographs are widely performed prior to spine surgery, no studies have been done so far to investigate whether the thoracic pedicle profile on plain radiographs affect thoracic pedicle screw insertion. Therefore, this is a cadaveric study aimed to determine the relationship between plain radiographic thoracic pedicle profile in Asians and the outcome of pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic spine.

METHODS

A pre-insertion radiograph with an enlargement reference scale was performed and surgeons were blinded to the plain radiographic morphometry of the thoracic pedicles. From the pre-insertion radiograph, the normalized pedicle width and height (which controls for any magnification error) as well as the pedicle width:body width (PWBW) and pedicle width:pedicle height (PWPH) ratio was derived. 240 pedicle screws were inserted in ten Asian cadavers from T1 to T12 using the funnel technique. 5.0 mm screws were used from T1 to T6 while 6.0 mm screws were used from T7 to T12. Perforations were detected by direct visualization via wide laminectomies after pedicle screw insertion. The outcome of thoracic pedicle screw insertion was correlated with the radiological profile using independent t-test. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to investigate the correlation between the ratios and the normalised pedicle width and height.

RESULTS

The narrowest pedicle width is from T3 to T6 determined from normalized measurement of the pedicle width. T5 pedicle width is the smallest measuring 4.1 ± 1.3 mm. The overall perforation rate is 10.4% (25 perforations). There is only one significant perforation. There were twice as many lateral and inferior perforations compared to the medial perforations. 48% of the perforations occurred at T1, T2 and T3. Pedicles <4.0 mm in width and upper thoracic pedicles are risk factors for pedicle perforation. The normalised pedicle width has a high degree of linear correlation with PWBW and a normalised pedicle width of 4.0 mm correlated with a PWBW ratio of 0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Plain radiographic thoracic pedicle morphometry has an influence on the outcome of thoracic pedicle screw insertion in Asian cadavers. Pedicle width <4.0 mm is associated with higher risk of pedicle perforation. This critical value corresponds to a PWBW ratio of 0.3. Identification of such pedicle profile warrants full evaluation of the morphometry of the thoracic pedicles and possibly extra-pedicular techniques should be employed to avert the risk of critical pedicle perforation.

Placement of pedicle screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation in lumbar vertebrae with axial rotation

Despite potential advantages of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation, there still remain a lot of controversies about the indications of this technology, especially whether it is worthy of being used in placement of pedicle screws in lumbar spine. However, according to the inconsistent conclusions reported in the literature and our experiences, the traditional method relying on anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopic views to guide lumbar pedicle screw insertion is unable to meet the requirement of precise screw placement. Based on our observation, screw malposition seems to occur concomitant with vertebral axial rotation which is a ubiquitous phenomenon. Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation can provide the most valuable axial images in real-time, so it may be useful for placement of pedicle screws in lumbar spine. This study was intended to evaluate the effect of axial rotation of lumbar vertebrae on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using the traditional method, as well as assess the value of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation in improving the accuracy. Sixteen lumbar simulation models at different degrees of axial rotation (0°, 5°, 10°, and 20°), with every four assigned the same degree, were equally divided into two groups (traditional method group and three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation group). Random placement of pedicle screws was carried out, followed by CT scan postoperatively. Then the outer pedicle cortex contours were depicted from reconstructed sectional pedicle images using Photoshop. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated by determining the interrelationship between screw trajectory and pedicle cortex (quality), and measuring the shortest distance from pedicle screw axis to outer cortex of the pedicle (quantity). Eighty pedicle screws were implanted, respectively, in each group. In traditional method group, statistical difference existed in the accuracy of pedicle screw placement at different axial rotational degrees (P < 0.05). With degrees increasing, the accuracy declined. The accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation group was higher than traditional method group in vertebrae with axial rotation (P < 0.01). In qualitative evaluation, the accuracy of the two methods had statistical difference when the degree was 20°, and in quantitative evaluation, statistical difference existed in 5°, 10°, and 20° of vertebral axial rotation.