253
|
Enriquez-Navas PM, Wojtkowiak JW, Gatenby RA. Application of Evolutionary Principles to Cancer Therapy. Cancer Res 2015; 75:4675-80. [PMID: 26527288 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-1337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The dynamic cancer ecosystem, with its rich temporal and spatial diversity in environmental conditions and heritable cell phenotypes, is remarkably robust to therapeutic perturbations. Even when response to therapy is clinically complete, adaptive tumor strategies almost inevitably emerge and the tumor returns. Although evolution of resistance remains the proximate cause of death in most cancer patients, a recent analysis found that evolutionary terms were included in less than 1% of articles on the cancer treatment outcomes, and this has not changed in 30 years. Here, we review treatment methods that attempt to understand and exploit intratumoral evolution to prolong response to therapy. In general, we find that treating metastatic (i.e., noncurable) cancers using the traditional strategy aimed at killing the maximum number of tumor cells is evolutionarily unsound because, by eliminating all treatment-sensitive cells, it enables rapid proliferation of resistant populations-a well-known evolutionary phenomenon termed "competitive release." Alternative strategies, such as adaptive therapy, "ersatzdroges," and double-bind treatments, shift focus from eliminating tumor cells to evolution-based methods that suppress growth of resistant populations to maintain long-term control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert A Gatenby
- Department of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
254
|
Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family in multidrug resistance: A review of the past decade. Cancer Lett 2015; 370:153-64. [PMID: 26499806 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 522] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Revised: 10/09/2015] [Accepted: 10/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a serious phenomenon employed by cancer cells which hampers the success of cancer pharmacotherapy. One of the common mechanisms of MDR is the overexpression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) efflux transporters in cancer cells such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) that limits the prolonged and effective use of chemotherapeutic drugs. Researchers have found that developing inhibitors of ABC efflux transporters as chemosensitizers could overcome MDR. But the clinical trials have shown that most of these chemosensitizers are merely toxic and only show limited or no benefits to cancer patients, thus new inhibitors are being explored. Recent findings also suggest that efflux pumps of the ABC transporter family are subject to epigenetic gene regulation. In this review, we summarize recent findings of the role of ABC efflux transporters in MDR.
Collapse
|
255
|
Willyerd FA, Empey PE, Philbrick A, Ikonomovic MD, Puccio AM, Kochanek PM, Okonkwo DO, Clark RSB. Expression of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters B1 and C1 after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Humans. J Neurotrauma 2015; 33:226-31. [PMID: 25891836 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.3879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transport proteins ABCC1 and ABCB1 (also known as multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 and p-glycoprotein, respectively), are key membrane efflux transporters of drugs and endogenous substrates, including in the brain. The impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on ABCC1 and ABCB1 expression in humans is unknown. We hypothesized that ABCC1 and ABCB1 expression would be altered in brain tissue from patients acutely after severe TBI. Archived TBI samples (n=10) from our Brain Trauma Research Center and control samples (n=7) from our Alzheimer Disease Research Center were obtained under Institutional Review Board approval. Protein was extracted from fresh frozen cortical brain tissue for Western blot analysis and sections were obtained from fixed cortical tissue for immunohistochemistry. Relative abundance of ABCC1 was increased in samples from TBI versus controls (2.8±2.5 fold; p=0.005). ABCC1 immunohistochemistry was consistent with Western blot data, with increased immunoreactivity in cerebral blood vessel walls, as well as cells with the morphological appearance of neurons and glia in TBI versus controls. Relative abundance of ABCB1 was similar between TBI and controls (p=0.76), and ABCB1 immunoreactivity was primarily associated with cerebral blood vessels in both groups. These human data show that TBI increases ABCC1 expression in the brain, consistent with possible implications for both patients receiving pharmacological inhibitors and/or substrates of ABCC1 after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Anthony Willyerd
- 1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,7 Phoenix Children's Children's Hospital, Critical Care, and the University of Arizona , Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Philip E Empey
- 2 Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,6 Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ashley Philbrick
- 2 Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Milos D Ikonomovic
- 3 Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ava M Puccio
- 4 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick M Kochanek
- 1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,5 Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 4 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert S B Clark
- 1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,5 Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,6 Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
256
|
Feng X, Ding L, Qiu F. Potential drug interactions associated with glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhetinic acid. Drug Metab Rev 2015; 47:229-38. [PMID: 25825801 DOI: 10.3109/03602532.2015.1029634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Glycyrrhizin (GZ), the main active component of licorice, is a widely used therapeutic in the clinic. Depending on the disease, the treatment may involve a long course of high dose GZ. Another component of licorice, glycyrrhetinic acid (GA), is the main active metabolite of GZ and is thought to be responsible for the majority of the pharmacological properties of GZ. Therefore, GZ and GA are both used for therapeutic purposes. In addition, GZ and GA are also widely used to sweeten and flavor foods. Due to this widespread, multifaceted use of these substances, potential drug interactions with GZ and GA have recently gained attention. Along these lines, this review covers the known effects of GZ and GA on drug-metabolizing enzymes and efflux transporters. We conclude that both GZ and GA may have an effect on the activity of CYPs. For example, GZ may induce CYP3A activity through activation of PXR. Also, GZ and GA may affect glucuronidation in rats and humans. Furthermore, 18β-GA is a potent inhibitor of P-gp, while GZ and GA are inhibitors of MRP1, MRP2 and BCRP. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many medications may be altered when used concurrently with GZ or GA, which is also covered in this review. Overall, GZ, GA or related products should be taken with caution when taken with additional medications due to the possible drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinchi Feng
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Tianjin , China and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|