Valsartan for prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation

Mechanisms of atrial structural changes caused by stretch occurring before and during early atrial fibrillation

Structural remodelling occurring before, due to the underlying heart disease, and during atrial fibrillation (AF) sets the stage for permanent AF. Current therapy in AF aims to maintain sinus rhythm in symptomatic patients, but outcome is unfortunately poor. Stretch of the atria is a main contributor to atrial remodelling. In this review, we describe different aspects of structural remodelling as seen in animal models and in patients with AF, including atrial enlargement, cellular hypertrophy, dedifferentiation, fibrosis, apoptosis, and loss of contractile elements. In the second part, we describe downstream signals of mechanical stretch and their contribution to AF and structural remodelling. Ultimately, knowledge of mechanisms underlying structural remodelling may help to identify new pharmacological targets for AF prevention.

n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for the prevention of arrhythmia recurrence after electrical cardioversion of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study

AIMS

Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) often recurs after direct current electrical cardioversion (ECV). As several experimental and clinical studies suggest that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may have antiarrhythmic properties even at the atrial level, we aimed to evaluate whether oral supplementation with PUFAs, in addition to conventional antiarrhythmic drugs, could reduce the recurrence rate of the arrhythmia after ECV of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and four patients (mean age 69.3 years, 33% females) with persistent AF were randomly assigned to receive 3 g/day of PUFAs until ECV and 2 g/day thereafter (104 patients) or placebo (100 patients) for 6 months, beginning at least 1 week before ECV. Selection of conventional antiarrhythmic prophylaxis was left to local medical advice. The cardiac rhythm was assessed by both trans-telephonic monitoring and clinical visits. Primary end-point was the recurrence rate of AF. Sinus rhythm was restored, either spontaneously or after ECV, in 187 patients (91.7%); 95 patients (91.4%) on PUFAs and 92 patients (92.0%) on placebo (P=not significant). AF relapsed in 56 (58.9%) of the PUFAs patients and in 47 (51.1%) of the placebo patients (P=0.28). The mean time to AF recurrence was 83±8 days in the PUFAs group and 106±9 days in the placebo group (P=0.29).

CONCLUSION

Our results do not support the hypothesis that, in patients undergoing ECV of chronic persistent AF, supplementation with PUFAs in addition to the usual antiarrhythmic treatment reduces recurrent AF.

Upstream effect for atrial fibrillation: still a dilemma?

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Ion channel blocking agents are often characterized by limited long-term efficacy and several side effects. In addition, ablative invasive procedures are neither easily accessible nor always efficacious. The "upstream therapy," which includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone receptor antagonists, statins, glucocorticoids, and ω-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids, targets arrhythmia substrate, influencing atrial structural and electrical remodeling that play an essential role in atrial fibrillation induction and maintenance. The mechanisms involved and the most important clinical evidence regarding the upstream therapy influence on atrial fibrillation are presented in this review. Some open questions are also proposed.

Relationship between the long-term preventive effect of combined treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs plus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and circadian variation in the onset of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

We examined the relationship between the efficacy of combined treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) plus enalapril for maintaining sinus rhythm and circadian variation in the onset of paroxysmal AF.Three hundred and forty-four patients with paroxysmal AF (239 men, mean age, 69 ± 11 years) who could be followed up ≥ 12 months were divided into 3 groups on the basis of circadian variation in the onset of AF: a diurnal group (7:00 AM-5:00 PM, n = 57), a nocturnal group (5:00 PM-7:00 AM, n = 108), and a mixed group (onset during both periods, n = 169). The maintenance rate of sinus rhythm during the follow-up period was compared between combined therapy (AAD plus enalapril) and AAD alone.In the diurnal group, the maintenance rates of sinus rhythm at 12, 36, 60, and 90 months were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, for patients treated with AAD plus enalapril (n = 22) versus 97%, 91%, 89%, and 80% for patients treated with AAD alone (n = 35, P < 0.05). In the nocturnal group, the maintenance rates of sinus rhythm at 12, 36, 60, and 90 months were 96%, 96%, 96%, and 92%, respectively, in patients treated with AAD plus enalapril (n = 24) versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% in patients treated with AAD alone (n = 84, P = NS). In the mixed group, maintenance rates of sinus rhythm at 12, 36, 60, and 90 months were 90%, 71%, 61%, and 57%, respectively, in patients treated with AAD plus enalapril (n = 49) versus 88%, 78%, 68%, and 61% in patients treated with AAD alone (n = 120, P = NS). Our findings suggest that the preventive efficacy of combined therapy with AAD plus enalapril is dependent on the timing of onset of paroxysmal AF, and this regimen seems to be most beneficial for the diurnal type of paroxysmal AF.

Effect of High-dose Telmisartan on the Prevention of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertensive Patients

Background: Telmisartan has been shown to exert an equivalent action as ramipril on the prevention of cardiovascular events, but the dose-dependent actions of telmisartan on the prevention of events remain unknown. Objective: We investigated the dose-dependent effects of telmisartan on the prevention of AF in patients associated with risk factors. Methods: One hundred hypertensive patients were randomized to take 40 mg (low-dose group: n=57) or 80 mg (high-dose group: n=43) of telmisartan for 24 months. The primary endpoints were defined as a new development and/or recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Results: The mean values of the blood pressure in both groups decreased significantly and to similar degrees after 24 months, in the low-dose (p < 0.01) and high-dose (p < 0.01) groups. At the end of the follow-up, the incidence of AF was lower in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the proportion of AF recurrences in the patients with a past history of paroxysmal AF was lower in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group (p < 0.05). Further, using a logistic regression model, there were no risk factors associated with the incidence of AF. Conclusion: The results indicated that telmisartan in low doses was as effective in controlling the blood pressure as in high doses, but high doses of telmisartan had beneficial effects on preventing the recurrence of AF in hypertensive patients.

Statin therapy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation trial (SToP AF trial)

BACKGROUND

Inflammation and oxidative stress are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Statins have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. We tested if atorvastatin reduced AF recurrence after DC cardioversion (CV) by modifying systemic oxidative stress and inflammation (NCT00252967).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 80 mg (n = 33) or placebo (n = 31) before CV. Treatment was continued for 12 months or until AF recurred. Serum oxidative stress markers (ratios of oxidized to reduced glutathione and cysteine, derivatives of reactive oxygen species, isoprostanes) and inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C- reactive protein [hs-CRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-1β[IL-1β], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNFα]) were measured at baseline and on follow-up. AF recurred in 22 (66.7%) of atorvastatin and 26 (83.9%) of placebo group (P = 0.2). The adjusted hazard ratio of having recurrence on atorvastatin versus on placebo was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.01, P = 0.3). There was no significant difference in the time to recurrence using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (median [IR]: 29 [2-145] days versus 22 [7-70] days, P = 0.9). Although no significant effect was seen on oxidative stress, 2 of 4 inflammatory markers, IL-6 (adjusted OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-0.97, P = 0.04) and hs-CRP (adjusted OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.95, P = 0.03) were significantly lowered with atorvastatin. Cholesterol levels significantly decreased with atorvastatin (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose atorvastatin did not reduce the recurrence of AF after CV. It reduced selective markers of inflammation without affecting systemic oxidative stress. Failure of atorvastatin to prevent AF recurrence may be due to its failure to affect oxidative stress.

Atrial fibrillation-the final frontier

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and represents a significant health care issue. The diagnosis and management of AF uses a significant proportion of the health care budget and is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is still an important treatment option for symptomatic AF. Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) have had inconsistent results for the prevention of recurrent AF and have been hampered by significant adverse effects. Catheter ablation has rapidly evolved and is fast becoming an alternative for AF prevention. Although multiple treatment options exist, no single modality is effective for all patients. This review outlines best current practice for AF prevention and future perspectives, focusing on new and promising developments in antiarrhythmic drug therapy, strategies for ablation therapy, and forms of hybrid therapy that may offer improved outcomes in selected patients.

Candesartan decreases type III procollagen-N-peptide levels and inflammatory marker levels and maintains sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation

This study has evaluated whether candesartans prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and decrease type III procollagen-N-peptide (PIIINP) levels. A total of 153 patients with AF were enrolled in this study. Three groups of patients were compared; candesartan group was treated with candesartan plus bepridil (n = 52); and carvedilol group with carvedilol plus bepridil (n = 51); and bepridil group with bepridil alone (n = 50). The primary end point was length of time to the recurrence of AF and all patients were ultimately followed-up for 730 days. Serum levels of the biomarkers were measured at baseline and after 24 months. Maintenance of sinus rhythm was achieved in 25 (50%) patients in bepridil group, 37 (73%) in candesartan group, and 34 (67%) in carvedilol group, giving a bepridil group/candesartan group hazard ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.21-0.63; P = 0.03). Candesartan significantly decreased PIIINP levels at 24 months than at baseline in sinus rhythm group (0.57 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.64 +/- 0.05 U/mL, P = 0.04) and did not decrease PIIINP levels in the recurrence group. In conclusions, PIIINP might be related to the possibility of the atrial fibrosis for AF. However, further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between PIIINP and AF.

Non-antiarrhythmic drugs to prevent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia found in clinical practice. The majority of patients with AF are still candidates for antiarrhythmic drug treatment, not only for acute reversion to sinus rhythm but also for long-term treatment to prevent recurrences of AF. Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs, however, are unable to provide complete efficacy in all patients, and present problematic risks of proarrhythmia. The progressively increasing prevalence of AF supports the need to develop improved therapeutic approaches for the clinical management of arrhythmia. Accordingly, new treatment techniques aimed at suppressing the origin of the arrhythmogenic foci have been developed in the last decade. However, ablative treatments are only available for selected patients. Because of these factors, and also because primary prevention of AF should be our goal, the introduction of non-antiarrhythmic agents that could prevent both new-onset AF and recurrences of AF may eventually improve patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of this epidemic disease. The potential clinical value of these non-antiarrhythmic options is currently under active investigation. There is now clinical and experimental evidence that many drugs may have beneficial effects in preventing AF through several possible mechanisms. Non-antiarrhythmic drugs, such as ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), corticosteroids, and N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may have a positive effect in patients with AF or in preventing AF in patients at risk.

Challenges in the classification of atrial fibrillation

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasing worldwide. AF is of public health importance because it accounts for substantial morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. AF may be transient initially, but many patients have progressive disease marked by increasing frequency and duration of episodes. Various classification schemes for AF have been proposed, although current guidelines are based on temporal rhythm-based patterns. We discuss existing schemes for the classification of AF, focusing on the advantages and limitations of the pattern-based scheme, in the context of new knowledge about AF pathophysiology, AF patterns, and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we address gaps in knowledge that present opportunities to re-examine the current pattern-based classification of AF. A future classification scheme should ideally combine elements such as the risk of stroke, an assessment of symptoms, and the degree of impairment of the atrial substrate.

Prevention of atrial fibrillation by Renin-Angiotensin system inhibition a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The authors reviewed published clinical trial data on the effects of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF), aiming to define when RAS inhibition is most effective.

BACKGROUND

Individual studies examining the effects of RAS inhibition on AF prevention have reported controversial results.

METHODS

All published randomized controlled trials reporting the effects of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in the primary or secondary prevention of AF were included.

RESULTS

A total of 23 randomized controlled trials with 87,048 patients were analyzed. In primary prevention, 6 trials in hypertension, 2 trials in myocardial infarction, and 3 trials in heart failure were included (some being post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials). In secondary prevention, 8 trials after cardioversion and 4 trials assessing the medical prevention of recurrence were included. Overall, RAS inhibition reduced the odds ratio for AF by 33% (p < 0.00001), but there was substantial heterogeneity among trials. In primary prevention, RAS inhibition was effective in patients with heart failure and those with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy but not in post-myocardial infarction patients overall. In secondary prevention, RAS inhibition was often administered in addition to antiarrhythmic drugs, including amiodarone, further reducing the odds for AF recurrence after cardioversion by 45% (p = 0.01) and in patients on medical therapy by 63% (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis supports the concept of RAS inhibition as an emerging treatment for the primary and secondary prevention of AF but acknowledges the fact that some of the primary prevention trials were post-hoc analyses. Further areas of uncertainty include potential differences among specific RAS inhibitors and possible interactions or synergistic effects with antiarrhythmic drugs.

Maximizing scientific knowledge from randomized clinical trials

Trialists have an ethical and financial responsibility to plan and conduct clinical trials in a manner that will maximize the scientific knowledge gained from the trial. However, the amount of scientific information generated by randomized clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine is highly variable. Generation of trial databases and/or biobanks originating in large randomized clinical trials has successfully increased the knowledge obtained from those trials. At the 10th Cardiovascular Trialist Workshop, possibilities and pitfalls in designing and accessing clinical trial databases were discussed by a group of trialists. This review focuses on the arguments for conducting posttrial database studies and presents examples of studies in which posttrial knowledge generation has been substantial. Possible strategies to ensure successful trial database or biobank generation are discussed, in particular with respect to collaboration with the trial sponsor and to analytic pitfalls. The advantages of creating screening databases in conjunction with a given clinical trial are described; and finally, the potential for posttrial database studies to become a platform for training young scientists is outlined.

New pharmacological targets and treatments for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an arrhythmia of growing clinical concern that is increasing in prevalence and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pharmacological agents remain the first-line therapy for the AF patient, and the potential advantages of sinus rhythm maintenance motivate continued efforts to identify novel pharmacological means to restore and maintain sinus rhythm. Traditional antiarrhythmic agents only moderately suppress AF and present problematic concerns of proarrhythmia and extracardiac toxicity. Current investigational or recently approved strategies for improving efficacy and safety of anti-AF agents include (i) specific or predominant blockade of atrial ion channels; (ii) "upstream therapies" affecting non-ion channel targets that influence electrical and structural remodeling, inflammation and oxidative stress; (iii) amiodarone derivatives with an improved safety profile; (iv) intracellular calcium handling; and (v) therapies aiming at alleviating conduction disturbances (gap junction coupling enhancers). This review provides a succinct overview of some of these strategies.

Effects of angiotensin receptor blockade on atrial electrical remodelling and the ‘second factor’ in a goat burst-paced model of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is self-perpetuating, via mechanisms of acute electrical remodelling and ‘second factors’ acting over a longer time course. Renin—angiotensin system (RAS) blockade may inhibit AF self-perpetuation. We evaluated the effects of RAS blockade with candesartan in a burst-paced goat model of lone AF in which both mechanisms are known to operate. Bioactivity of oral candesartan was demonstrated in 10 goats by inhibition of the pressor effect of angiotensin II. The effects of candesartan on electrical remodelling were assessed in 12 placebo and 12 candesartan-treated goats in a 28-day burst pacing protocol. To assess the effects of candesartan on second factors (structural remodelling), 16 goats underwent further 28-day periods of burst pacing (two periods in 16 goats, three periods in eight goats) each separated by periods of sinus rhythm sufficient for electrical remodelling to reverse. There was a progressive rise in angiotensin levels in both groups. Candesartan (0.5 mg/kg/day) achieved a 76% blunting of the pressor effect of angiotensin II and had no effect on electrical remodelling; the half time for fall of atrial effective refractory period (AERP) was 22.3 ± 4.9 h (placebo) and 22.0 ± 3.2 h (candesartan) ( p = ns). Candesartan had no effect on AF stability, which progressively increased over successive 28-day periods (ANOVA p < 0.05). Candesartan had no effect on atrial electrical remodelling or the operation of ‘second factors’ in a goat model of lone AF. These findings suggest that any benefits of RAS blockade in patients with AF are unlikely to be due to direct effects on atrial remodelling.

New developments in atrial antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing clinical problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), although highly effective in acute cardioversion of paroxysmal AF, are generally only moderately successful in long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The use of AADs is often associated with an increased risk of ventricular proarrhythmia, extracardiac toxicity, and exacerbation of concomitant diseases such as heart failure. AF is commonly associated with intracardiac and extracardiac disease, which can modulate the efficacy and safety of AAD therapy. In light of the multifactorial intracardiac and extracardiac causes of AF generation, current development of anti-AF agents is focused on modulation of ion channel activity as well as on upstream therapies that reduce structural substrates. The available data indicate that multiple ion channel blockers exhibiting potent inhibition of peak I(Na) with relatively rapid unbinding kinetics, as well as inhibition of late I(Na) and I(Kr), may be preferable for the management of AF when considering both safety and efficacy.

Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is one of the main regulators of blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and volume homeostasis in normal physiology, and contributes to the development of renal and cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Therefore, pharmacologic blockade of RAAS constitutes an attractive strategy in preventing the progression of renal and CV diseases. This concept has been supported by clinical trials involving patients with hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, and heart failure, and those after myocardial infarction. The use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in clinical practice has increased over the last decade. Since their introduction in 1995, seven ARBs have been made available, with approved indications for hypertension and some with additional indications beyond blood pressure reduction. Considering that ARBs share a similar mechanism of action and exhibit similar tolerability profiles, it is assumed that a class effect exists and that they can be used interchangeably. However, pharmacologic and dosing differences exist among the various ARBs, and these differences can potentially influence their individual effectiveness. Understanding these differences has important implications when choosing an ARB for any particular condition in an individual patient, such as heart failure, stroke, and CV risk reduction (prevention of myocardial infarction). A review of the literature for existing randomized controlled trials across various ARBs clearly indicates differences within this class of agents. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of ARBs in the prevention and reduction of CV rates of morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients.

Clinical predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence in the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico-Atrial Fibrillation (GISSI-AF) trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that frequently recurs after restoration of sinus rhythm (SR). Identifying risk factors for recurrence may help define the best strategy for secondary prevention.

METHODS

The GISSI-AF trial enrolled 1,442 patients in SR with at least 2 documented AF episodes in the previous 6 months or after cardioversion in the last 2 weeks. Patients were randomized to valsartan or placebo; all other treatments for AF or underlying heart diseases were allowed. Primary end points were time to first recurrence of AF and proportion of patients with >1 AF episode during 1-year follow-up. We evaluated clinical and electrocardiographic baseline characteristics of all patients to identify independent predictors for AF recurrence using a Cox multivariable model.

RESULTS

Risk factors for AF recurrence were a history of 2 or more AF episodes in the previous 6 months, independent of the modality of SR restoration, spontaneous (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.77, P = .002), or by cardioversion (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40, P = .038), and a lower heart rate during SR (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, P = .052). The risk factors were the same for >1 AF recurrence. Patients treated with amiodarone had a lower risk for both end points (P < .0001 and P = .017), whereas those on diuretics had a greater risk (P = .009 and P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In the GISSI-AF study population, AF history had significant prognostic value independent of the modality of SR restoration. Amiodarone and diuretic treatment affected the rate of AF recurrence.

Early management of atrial fibrillation: from imaging to drugs to ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and is responsible for the highest number of rhythm-related disorders and cardioembolic strokes worldwide. Early management of this condition will lower the risk of AF-associated morbidity and mortality. Targeted drug therapy has an important role in preventing the progression of AF through modification of the substrate. Discovery of the role of pulmonary veins as a trigger has been an important breakthrough, leading to the development of pulmonary vein ablation-an established curative therapy for drug-resistant AF. Identifying the underlying reasons for the abnormal firing of venous cardiomyocytes and the widespread progressive alterations of atrial tissue found in persistent AF are challenges for the future. Novel imaging techniques may help to determine the right time for intervention, provide specific targets for ablation, and judge the efficacy of treatment. If new developments can successfully address these issues, the knowledge acquired as a result will have a vital role in preclinical and early management of AF.

Valsartan: more than a decade of experience

Valsartan is a nonpeptide angiotensin receptor antagonist that selectively blocks the binding of angiotensin II to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. The efficacy, tolerability and safety of valsartan have been demonstrated in large-scale studies in hypertension, heart failure (HF) and post-myocardial infarction (MI). This review focuses on what was learned from the valsartan clinical research programme and other comparative trials published from 1997 to the present. Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of valsartan in lowering blood pressure (BP) in a variety of patient populations (including elderly, women, children, obese patients, patients with diabetes mellitus, patients with chronic kidney disease [CKD], patients at high risk of cardiovascular [CV] disease, African Americans, Hispanic Americans and Asians) and in improving outcomes in CV disease and CKD. In hypertension, valsartan exhibits dose-dependent efficacy in reducing both systolic and diastolic BP over the once-daily dose range of 80-320 mg; doses as high as 640 mg/day have been studied and found to be efficacious and safe. BP control can be enhanced with a more consistent 24-hour BP-lowering profile by using single-pill, fixed-dose combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). The cardioprotective benefits of valsartan have been demonstrated in large-scale outcome trials and include significant reductions in CV morbidity and mortality in HF, following MI, and in patients with co-morbid hypertension and coronary artery disease and/or HF; reductions in HF hospitalizations; and reductions in the incidence of stroke. The magnitude of these effects is comparable with that demonstrated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; however, valsartan has a more favourable tolerability profile, with a significantly lower incidence of cough and only rare reports of angio-oedema, both class effects of ACE inhibitor use. Consistent with its angiotensin receptor-blocking effects, valsartan also reduces circulating levels of biochemical markers that are associated with angiotensin II-mediated endothelial dysfunction and CV risk (e.g. high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or oxidized low-density lipoprotein). Improvements in CKD with valsartan include statistically and clinically meaningful reductions in urinary albumin and protein excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic patients with CKD. In short-term studies, valsartan has improved or stabilized various indices of metabolic function in at-risk patients, including those with co-morbid hypertension, obesity and/or metabolic syndrome. Because of this, valsartan is being prospectively investigated for its ability to reduce the incidence of new-onset diabetes and provide cardioprotection in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Valsartan and valsartan/HCTZ are well tolerated. In clinical trials, adverse events during valsartan treatment were similar to those occurring with placebo. The combination of valsartan/HCTZ was better tolerated than HCTZ alone. Valsartan is administered once daily for hypertension; doses are usually taken upon awakening. In patients with HF or MI, valsartan is administered twice daily.

New antiarrhythmic drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation

Inadequacies in current therapies for atrial fibrillation have made new drug development crucial. Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs increase the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia. In drug development, the focus has been on favourable multichannel-blocking profiles, atrial-specific ion-channels, and novel non-channel targets (upstream therapy). Molecular modification of the highly effective multichannel blocker, amiodarone, to improve safety and tolerability has produced promising analogues such as dronedarone, although this drug seems less effective than does amiodarone. Vernakalant, an atrial-selective drug with reduced proarrhythmic risk, might be useful for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Ranolazine, another atrial-selective agent initially developed as an antianginal, has efficacy for atrial fibrillation and is being tested in prospective clinical trials. So-called upstream therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin-receptor inhibitors, statins, or omega-3 fatty acids and fish oil that target atrial remodelling could be effective, but need further clinical validation. We focus on the basic and clinical pharmacology of newly emerging antiarrhythmic drugs and non-traditional approaches such as upstream therapy for atrial fibrillation.

[Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias]

This article contains a review of some of the most important studies in the field of arrhythmias and cardiac electrophysiology that have been reported in publications during the last year. They were selected because of their clinical relevance and because they made a positive contribution to the continuing technological development of the invasive procedures used in cardiac electrophysiology.

Adjuvant therapy for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder, with increasing prevalence in the aging US population and affecting more than 2.3 million people. Current approaches for managing AF are rate- or rhythm-control strategies, both using anti-thrombotic therapy to prevent thromboembolism. While great advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of AF, few new strategies have shown promise in prevention or treatment of AF. Recent data suggest that non-antiarrhythmic medication may be useful in modifying the substrate that allows AF precipitation and perpetuation. This article reviews the data on the role of these agents in the prevention and management of AF as an adjunct to standard therapy.

Hypertension and atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an emerging public health problem. The most important risk factor for developing chronic AF is uncontrolled hypertension. Uncontrolled hypertension promotes the initiation and perpetuation of AF through atrial remodeling. Experimental evidence has demonstrated the important role of the renin-angiotensin system in atrial remodeling. Retrospective analysis of several large clinical trials and small prospective trials suggests the beneficial role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in preventing the onset and recurrence of AF in different populations. Several large prospective trials with longer follow-up periods are in progress. These trials may provide definitive evidence for the use of these agents in the prevention of AF.

Demographic determinants and effect of pre-operative angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after CABG surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in about 27% to 40% of post cardiac surgery patients. AF following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is associated with a two-fold increase in morbidity and mortality. Various demographic risk factors and medications have been studied to predict the occurrence of this arrhythmia. The role of angiotensin related medications on the occurrence of AF in CABG patients is not determined.

METHODS

Retrospective clinical and statistical analysis was made of all the patients who had undergone CABG surgery at Lehigh Valley Hospital during the years 2005 and 2006. Patients with chronic AF and those undergoing valvular surgery with CABG were excluded. Statistic analysis included chi-square test for categorical and student t-test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

757 patients (560 males and 197 females) were studied. AF occurred in 19% of the patients. Age (70.5 vs. 65.1, p < 0.005. OR per year of age: 1.02, 95%CI: 1.018-1.023) and presence of hypertension (OR: 1.92, 95%CI: 1.086-3.140, p = 0.025) were significantly associated with occurrence of AF. Neither ARBs (OR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.431-1.410, p = 0.41) nor ACE inhibitors (OR: 1.01, 95%CI: 0.753-1.608, p = 0.63) reduced the occurrence of post operative AF. Patients with post operative AF had a significantly longer hospital stay (9.5 +/- 5.4 days vs. 6.9 +/- 4.3 days, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age and presence of hypertension were independent predictors of post-CABG AF. Patients with post operative AF had significantly longer hospital stay. Neither ARBs nor ACE inhibitors were associated with reduction of post-surgical AF. Further studies are needed to better delineate the role of angiotensin related medications on reduction of post-surgical AF.

Relation of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion to renal function

Angiotensin II exerts proinflammatory effects leading to atrial fibrosis that is associated with persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Renal function plays a major role in activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. We examined whether the level of impaired renal function, defined by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), would influence the maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful external electric cardioversion (ECV). One hundred two consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent successful ECV. Patients were prospectively followed for recurrence of AF by telephone interviews, Holter electrocardiograms, and electrocardiograms sent by primary care providers. Repeated GFR assays were performed before and 1 month after ECV. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to baseline GFR (I >90 ml/min, II 60 to 90 ml/min, III 30 to 59 ml/min, IV <30 ml/min). AF recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with moderately or severely decreased renal function (GFR <60 ml/min, p = 0.003). Patients with moderately (GFR 30 to 59 ml/min, p = 0.02) or only mildly (GFR 60 to 90 ml/min, p = 0.01) decreased renal function showed an increase in GFR if sinus rhythm was maintained at 1 month follow-up. In conclusion, impaired renal function was associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence after successful ECV.

[Pathophysiopathology of atrial fibrillation: applications to treatment]

The origin and persistence of AF result from a complex interaction between triggers, autonomic nervous system, substrate, and factors involved in atrial remodelling. The pathophysiology of AF differs from one patient to another, but recent advances have helped us to understand more about involved mechanisms and to translate this knowledge into improvements in AF therapy. An illustration is the elimination of triggers within pulmonary veins by means of catheter ablation. Dealing with structural atrial remodelling and atrial fibrosis remains still a great challenge. Solving these problems could help us to develop new approaches to AF prevention and treatment.

The effect and safety of the antithrombotic therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHADS score 1

BACKGROUND

The revised ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guideline recommends either aspirin or warfarin for the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in CHADS(2) score 1. We hypothesized that warfarin is superior to aspirin therapy for the prevention of stroke without increasing bleeding complication in AF patients with CHADS(2) score 1.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 1,502 patients (mean 62.4 +/- 13.8 years old, male 65.4%) who were treated for nonvalvular AF without previous stroke, the number of patients with CHADS(2) score 1 was 422 (62.9 +/- 10.7 years old, male 290 [68.7%]) and their antithrombotic therapies were as follows: warfarin (n = 143), aspirin (n = 124), other antiplatelet (n = 45), and no antithrombosis (none: n = 110). We reviewed the incidences of ischemic stroke, mortality, and bleeding complications during the follow-up period. Results were: (1) during 22.3 +/- 17.8 months of follow-up, the incidence of ischemic stroke was significantly lower in warfarin (6 patients, 4.2%, mean international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0 +/- 0.5 IU) than in aspirin (16 patients, 12.9%, P = 0.008) than none (23 patients, 20.9%, P < 0.001) without differences in all-cause mortality. (2) The incidence of major bleeding (decrease in hemoglobin >or=2 g/dL, requiring hospitalization or red blood cell transfusion >or=2 pints) was not different between warfarin (2.1%) and aspirin (0.8%, P = NS), but minor bleeding was more common in warfarin (10.5%) than in aspirin (2.4%, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

In AF patients with CHADS(2) score 1, warfarin was better to prevent ischemic stroke than aspirin without increasing the incidence of major bleeding complications. However, the incidence of minor bleeding was higher in the warfarin group than the aspirin group.

Clinical and serological predictors for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion

AIMS

Although electrical cardioversion (CV) is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), AF frequently recurs in spite of antiarrhythmic medications. We investigated the predictors of failed CV and AF recurrence after successful CV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 81 patients (M:F = 63:18, 59.1 +/- 10.5 years old) with AF who underwent CV, clinical, image, and CV findings (energy requirement, immediate recurrence of AF < 15 min), and pre-CV serological markers were evaluated.

RESULTS

(i) During 13.1 +/- 10.6 months of follow-up, 8.6% (7/81) showed failed CV, 59.26% (48/81) showed AF recurrence, and 32.1% (26/81) remained in sinus rhythm (no recurrence). (ii) Failed CV showed higher plasma levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta (P = 0.0260) than those with successful CV. (iii) Patients with AF recurrence were older (60.4 +/- 9.0 years old vs. 55.3 +/- 12.5 years old, P = 0.0220), had a higher incidence of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC; 68.1 vs. 40.0%, P = 0.0106), a lower prescription rate of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB; 27.0 vs. 50.0%, P = 0.0248) or spironolactone (0.0 vs. 19.2%, P = 0.0007), and lower plasma levels of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1alpha (P = 0.0105).

CONCLUSION

Post-CV recurrence commonly occurs in patients with age >60 years, SEC, under-utilization of ACE-I/ARB or spironolactone, and low plasma levels of SDF-1alpha. High plasma level of TGF-beta predicts failed CV.

Upstream therapy of atrial fibrillation

Failure of current pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation in maintaining sinus rhythm may be due to structural atrial remodeling caused by inflammation and fibrosis. Upstream therapy that interferes in the structural remodeling process may be effective in maintaining sinus rhythm. This article reviews upstream therapy in atrial fibrillation. Various prospective and retrospective studies demonstrate that upstream therapy, consisting of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, fish oils, glucocorticoids, or moderate physical activity, is associated with a reduced incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (i.e., primary prevention) and with a reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (i.e., secondary prevention). Larger clinical trials are required to further elucidate the position of upstream therapy in the primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation.