Oral Relugolix for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Changes in body composition and lipid profile in prostate cancer patients without bone metastases given Degarelix treatment: the BLADE prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-agonists in prostate cancer (PCa) patients induce sarcopenic obesity. The effect of LHRH-antagonist on body composition has never been explored. We evaluated changes in fat (FBM) and lean body mass (LBM) in PCa patients undergoing Degarelix.

METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study, enrolling 29 non-metastatic PCa patients eligible to LHRH-antagonist from 2017 to 2019. All patients received monthly subcutaneous injection of Degarelix for 12 months. Changes in FBM and LBM between baseline and 12-month Degarelix, as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, were the co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were changes in serum lipids, glucose profile and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Appendicular lean mass index (ALMI) and ALMI/FBM ratio were assessed as post-hoc analyses. Linear mixed models with random intercept tested for estimated least squared means differences (EMD).

RESULTS

FBM significantly increased after 12 months (EMD +2920.7, +13.8%, p < 0.001), whereas LBM remained stable (EMD -187.1, -0.3%, p = 0.8). No differences occurred in lipid profile. Glycated hemoglobin significantly increased and serum FSH significantly decreased. A significant inverse relationship was found between serum FSH and ALMI/FBM ratio after 12 month (r = -0.44, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The BLADE study prospectively evaluated changes in body composition after LHRH-antagonist. LHRH-antagonist therapy is associated to an increased risk of obesity and diabetes, but lean body mass and serum lipids are not affected. This may represent an additional evidence supporting the reduced cardiovascular risk associated with LHRH-antagonist. The role of FSH in influencing sarcopenic obesity in PCa after androgen deprivation deserves to be further explored.

Cardiovascular Toxicities of Androgen Deprivation Therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men, and cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death in patients with prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation therapy, the cornerstone of prostate cancer treatment, has been associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Emerging data supports decreased cardiovascular risk of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists compared to agonists. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing the relative safety of different modalities of androgen deprivation therapy. Racial disparities in cardiovascular outcomes in prostate cancer patients are starting to be explored. An intriguing inquiry connects androgen deprivation therapy with reduced risk of COVID-19 infection susceptibility and severity. Recognition of the cardiotoxicity of androgen deprivation therapy and aggressive risk factor modification are crucial for optimal patient care.

Cardiovascular Complications of Prostate Cancer Treatment

Treatment of prostate cancer (PC) is a rapidly evolving field of pharmacology research. In recent years, numerous novel therapeutics that improve survival and ameliorate disease control have been approved. Currently, the systemic treatment for prostate neoplasm consists of hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals, targeted therapy, and supportive agents (e.g., related to bone health). Unfortunately, many of them carry a risk of cardiovascular complications, which occasionally pose a higher mortality threat than cancer itself. This article provides a unique and comprehensive overview of the prevalence and possible mechanisms of cardiovascular toxicities of all PC therapies, including state-of-the-art antineoplastic agents. Additionally, this article summarizes available recommendations regarding screening and prevention of the most common cardiac complications among patients with advanced cancer disease.

Effect of androgen deprivation therapy on cardiovascular function in Chinese patients with advanced prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer, but its effect on cardiovascular and metabolic function in Asian patients is still inconclusive. We prospectively assess the effects of ADT on 36 patients with advanced prostate cancer, with reference to another 24 prostate cancer patients not requiring ADT, for 2 years. Patients’ anthropometric, metabolic and vascular parameters were assessed every six-monthly. The baseline parameters of the two groups were comparable. There was a significant negative effect of the usage of ADT on the changes in BMI (p = 0.020), waist to hip ratio (p = 0.005), body fat percentage (p = 0.012), and high-density-lipoprotein (p = 0.012). ADT-patients were 4.9 times more likely to have metabolic syndrome at 24 months. (CI 0.889–27.193, p = 0.068). The Framingham risk score (p = 0.018) and pulse-wave-velocity (p = 0.024) for ADT-group were also significantly higher than controls, which signified increase in cardiovascular risk. Although there was no statistically significant difference in ischemic cardiovascular events between two groups, a trend for more events in ADT-group was observed. Therefore, Asian patients have increased cardiovascular and metabolic risks after being treated with ADT for two years. Appropriate counselling and monitoring of associated complications with ADT are essential.

Cardiovascular risk profiles of GnRH agonists and antagonists: real-world analysis from UK general practice

PURPOSE

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay for the management of metastatic prostate cancer. Available pharmaceutical ADTs include gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists. Here, real-world data are presented from the UK general practitioner Optimum Patient Care Research Database. The study investigated the hypothesis that GnRH antagonists have lower cardiac event rates than GnRH agonists.

METHODS

The incidence of cardiac events following initiation of GnRH antagonist or agonist therapy was investigated in a population-based cohort study conducted in UK primary care between 2010 and 2017.

RESULTS

Analysis of real-world data from the UK primary care setting showed that relative risk of experiencing cardiac events was significantly lower with degarelix, a GnRH antagonist, compared with GnRH agonists (risk ratio: 0.39 [95% confidence interval 0.191, 0.799]; p = 0.01). Patients that received degarelix as first-line treatment switched treatment more frequently (33.7%), often to a GnRH agonist, than those who initiated treatment with a GnRH agonist (6.7-18.6%).

CONCLUSION

Screening for known or underlying vascular disease and identifying those at high risk of a cardiac event is important for risk mitigation in patients with prostate cancer receiving hormone therapy. The GnRH antagonist degarelix conferred a significantly lower risk of cardiac events than GnRH agonists. Prior to treatment, patients should be stratified based on level of cardiovascular (CV) risk, and appropriate lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions to mitigate CV risk should be recommended. CV risk factors and patient response to the intervention should be monitored at regular intervals.

Androgen receptor inhibitor treatments: Cardiovascular adverse events and comorbidity considerations in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer and cardiovascular (CV) disease share several risk factors, with the incidence of both rising with increasing age. Systemic prostate cancer therapies may increase CV risk. For example, gonadotropic releasing hormone agonists have been associated with increased development of CV risk factors, and potentially with CV disease. For men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), the opportunity to mitigate CV risk by appropriate selection of therapy (i.e., use of newer agents such as androgen receptor inhibitors) may be possible. The phase 3 PROSPER, SPARTAN, and ARAMIS trials for enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, the 3 approved androgen receptor inhibitors for men with nmCRPC, were all associated with increased metastasis-free survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our objective in writing this review is to improve awareness of the relationship between long-term androgen deprivation and increased risk for CV disease and inform treatment decision making for patients with mCRPC who also have CV comorbidities.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched from 2010 to November 5, 2019 for articles pertaining to androgen receptor inhibitors, androgen inhibition, apalutamide, darolutamide, enzalutamide, CV, and CaP.

RESULTS

We found literature describing the relationship between androgen inhibition and CV disease and risks. Given the increased risk of CV disease due to exposure to gonadotropic releasing hormone agonist therapy alone, understanding the potential for additional CV risks is important for patients with CV comorbidities when an androgen receptor inhibitor is added to their treatment. Another important consideration is the possibility of drug-drug interactions with comedications.

CONCLUSION

Management strategies for patients with mCRPC also treated for comorbidities including CV disease require appropriate selection of therapy, diet, and exercise to meet the needs of the individual patient profile.

Senescence and castration resistance in prostate cancer: A review of experimental evidence and clinical implications

The development of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) remains a major challenge in the treatment of this disease. While Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) can result in tumor shrinkage, a primary response of Prostate Cancer (PCa) cells to ADT is a senescent growth arrest. As a response to cancer therapies, senescence has often been considered as a beneficial outcome due to its association with stable growth abrogation, as well as the potential for immune system activation via the Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP). However, there is increasing evidence that not only can senescent cells regain proliferative capacity, but that senescence contributes to deleterious effects of cancer chemotherapy, including disease recurrence. Notably, the preponderance of work investigating the consequences of therapy-induced senescence on tumor progression has been performed in non-PCa models. Here, we summarize the evidence that ADT promotes a senescent response in PCa and postulate mechanisms by which senescence may contribute to the development of castration-resistance. Primarily, we suggest that ADT-induced senescence may support CRPC development via escape from senescence, by cell autonomous-reprogramming, and by the formation of a pro-tumorigenic SASP. However, due to the scarcity of direct evidence from PCa models, the consequences of ADT-induced senescence outlined here remain speculative until the relationship between senescence and CRPC can be experimentally defined.

Update on cardiovascular and metabolic risk profiles of hormonal agents used in managing advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a mainstay of therapy for advanced prostate cancer (CaP), may raise patients' risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related adverse events. The new androgen receptor (AR)-targeted agents are associated with hypertension and cardiovascular events. The most common non-CaP cause of death in men with CaP is CVD. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness of the metabolic and CV risks of ADT and to encourage proper monitoring of patients treated with hormonal agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To review the cardiovascular and metabolic risk profiles of hormonal agents in managing patients with advanced CaP, the author searched PubMed, meeting abstracts, and clinicaltrials.gov from 1941 through early 2020 using search terms such as locally advanced CaP guidelines, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist/antagonist, ADT, CaP, CVD, abdominal obesity metabolic syndrome, and cerebrovascular disorder. The author ultimately selected 42 of the most relevant publications for inclusion in this paper.

RESULTS

Data regarding cardiovascular risk in patients with CaP on ADT are inconsistent, though there may be evidence of less risk in GnRH antagonists than GnRH agonists in men with pre-existing CVD. Observational post hoc studies generally show higher risks for GnRH agonists than GnRH antagonists. A review of 6 phase 3 trials found that patients treated with GnRH antagonists had lower cardiovascular risk than those treated with agonists during the first year of ADT, and these differences were especially significant among men with pre-existing CVD. Additionally, a small prospective randomized phase 2 study, as well as a large phase 3 trial, showed that there were significantly more major adverse cardiovascular events in patients treated with a GnRH agonist compared to a GnRH antagonist. In addition, the AR-targeted agents in conjunction with ADT have been shown to have more hypertension and/or cardiovascular risk than ADT plus placebo in numerous phase 3 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether there is a difference in CVD risk between GnRH agonists and antagonists is the subject of an ongoing phase 3 trial with cardiovascular endpoints. Addition of newer AR-targeted agents may confer additional risk over ADT alone. Clinicians treating advanced CaP should be aware of underlying comorbidities of their patients before choosing either conventional ADT or adding AR-targeted agents. Physicians should monitor patients for hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular side effects that may require intervention in order to minimize downstream adverse events and should communicate with other colleagues on the patient's health care team to ensure the best outcomes.

Emerging cancer therapies and cardiovascular risk

The cardiovascular (CV) toxicity profiles of traditional cancer therapies such as anthracyclines and radiation therapy are familiar to many cardiologists. With the development and widespread use of additional cancer therapeutics, CV toxicities related to these agents are becoming more common. Cardiovascular specialists are often integrated into the care team for individuals with cancer and knowledge of the CV toxicities of cancer therapeutics has become essential. In this review, we provide a clinically focused summary of the current data regarding CV toxicities of common cancer therapies and identify potential management strategies for the CV specialist.

Resetting the Bar of Castration Resistance - Understanding Androgen Dynamics in Therapy Resistance and Treatment Choice in Prostate Cancer

This review discusses impact of advancements in biologic understanding of prostate cancer (PCa) on definition and diagnosis of castration-resistant PCa (CRPC), predictive factors for progression to CRPC and treatment strategies. More sensitive assays confirm that bilateral orchiectomy reduces serum testosterone (T) closer to < 20 ng/dL than < 50 ng/dL, and evidence suggests that achieving T < 20 ng/dL improves outcomes and delays CRPC emergence. Regular T assessments will evaluate whether T is adequately suppressed in the setting of potential progression to CRPC, given that late dosing may result in T escape. More advanced imaging modalities and biomarker assays allow earlier detection of disease progression. Predictive factors for progression to CRPC include Gleason grade, extent of metastatic spread, germline hereditary factors such as gene mutations affecting androgen receptor amplification or DNA repair deficiency mutations, prostate-specific antigen kinetics, and biomarker analyses. Treatment options for CRPC have expanded beyond androgen deprivation therapy to include therapies that suppress T or inhibit its activity through varying mechanisms. Future directions include therapies with novel biological targets, drug combinations and personalized treatments. Advanced PCa management aims to delay progression to CRPC and prolong survival. With redefinition of castration and advancements in understanding of the biology of disease progression, diagnosis and treatment strategies should be re-evaluated. Definition of CRPC could be updated to reflect the T < 20 ng/dL requirement as this is a 'true' castrate level and may improve outcomes. It is important that androgen deprivation therapy as foundational therapy is continued even as new CRPC therapies are introduced.

Abiraterone and enzalutamide had different adverse effects on the cardiovascular system: a systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Abiraterone and enzalutamide may increase the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using a combination of keywords related to "abiraterone," "enzalutamide," "prostate cancer," and "adverse events." Phase II-IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on abiraterone or enzalutamide for patients with nonmetastatic or metastatic CRPC were included. Outcome measures included (1) any grade cardiac disorder, (2) severe grade cardiac disorder, (3) any grade hypertension, and (4) severe grade hypertension, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to investigate the risk ratios (RRs) of abiraterone and enzalutamide. Surface under cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) and cumulative ranking probability plots based on the probability of developing cardiac disorders or hypertension were presented.

RESULTS

A total of 7103 patients from seven RCTs were included. Upon pairwise meta-analysis, abiraterone was associated with increased risks of any grade (RR = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.73) and severe grade cardiac disorders (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.16-2.53); enzalutamide was associated with increased risks of any grade (RR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.93-3.66) and severe grade hypertension (RR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.86-4.18). Based on the SUCRA rankings, abiraterone had a higher probability of cardiac disorders (84.84% for any grade and 85.12% for severe grade) than enzalutamide (62.83% for any grade and 50.76% for severe grade); whereas enzalutamide had a higher probability of hypertension (99.43% for any grade and 89.71% for severe grade) than abiraterone (49.08% for any grade and 49.37% for severe grade).

CONCLUSIONS

Abiraterone and enzalutamide had different adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. We should take this into consideration when we are deciding on the choice of novel hormonal agents for patients with CRPC.

Cardiovascular risks and toxicity - The Achilles heel of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the primary systemic therapy for treating locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Despite its positive effect on PCa patient survival, ADT causes various adverse effects, including increased cardiovascular risk factors and cardiotoxicity. Lifespans extension, early use of ADT, and second-line treatment with next-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors would further extend the duration of ADT and possibly increase the risk of ADT-induced cardiotoxicity. Meanwhile, information on the molecular mechanisms underlying ADT-induced cardiotoxicity and measures to prevent it is limited, mainly due to the lack of specifically designed preclinical studies and clinical trials. This review article compiles up-to-date evidence obtained from observational studies and clinical trials, in order to gain new insights for deciphering the association between ADT use and cardiotoxicity. In addition, potential cardioprotective strategies involving GnRH receptors and second messenger cGMP are discussed.

Cardiac biomarkers in patients with prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease receiving gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist vs antagonist

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists reduce testosterone levels for the treatment of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and CV disease (CVD), especially in patients with preexisting CVD treated with GnRH agonists. Here, we investigated the potential relationship between serum levels of the cardiac biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), and high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) and the risk of new CV events in prostate cancer patients with a history of CVD receiving a GnRH agonist or antagonist.

METHODS

Post-hoc analyses were performed of a phase II randomized study that prospectively assessed CV events in patients with prostate cancer and preexisting CVD, receiving GnRH agonist or antagonist. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether the selected biomarkers had any predictive effect on CV events at baseline and across a 12-month treatment period.

RESULTS

Baseline and disease characteristics of the 80 patients who took part in the study were well balanced between treatment arms. Ischemic heart disease (66%) and myocardial infarction (37%) were the most common prior CVD and the majority (92%) of patients received CV medication. We found that high levels of NTproBNP (p = 0.008), and hsTn (p = 0.004) at baseline were associated with the development of new CV events in the GnRH agonist group but not in the antagonist. In addition, a nonsignificant trend was observed between higher levels of NTproBNP over time and the development of new CV events in the GnRH agonist group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cardiac biomarkers may be worthy of further study as tools in the prediction of CV risk in prostate cancer patients receiving ADT. Analysis was limited by the small sample size; larger studies are required to validate biomarker use to predict CV events among patients receiving ADT.

Prostate Cancer 2020: "The Times They Are a'Changing"

Prostate cancer (PC) care is rapidly evolving, with improved treatment options and outcomes. Trials recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine report on an oral lutenizing-hormone-releasing hormone antagonist with superior endocrine and tolerability profiles and positive outcomes for non-metastatic PC with androgen receptor antagonists, respectively.