Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus

Gastroesophageal reflux after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Is it just related to technical details?

Although it is uncommon, gastroesophageal reflux disease can present after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and it is usually related to technical errors. Hiatal hernia, a narrow calibrated gastrojejunostomy and a long gastric pouch are all factors associated with the development of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux. Techniques are available to treat this condition, such as fundoplications with the gastric remnant, gastropexy to the arcuate ligament, teres ligament repair, or sphincter augmentation with the LINX device. Despite the growing number of reports of gastroesophageal reflux after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, it should be still considered the best surgical option for patients with obesity and a large hiatal hernia or complications secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Study of gastroesophageal reflux. Interpretation of functional tests in the obese patient

Overweight and obesity are a public health problem and in 1997 obesity was recognized as a global epidemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). Overweight and obesity affect almost 60% of adults and one in three children in Europe according to the most recent WHO report. Objectively, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as the presence of characteristic esophageal mucosal damage assessed by endoscopy and/or the demonstra-tion of pathological acid exposure by reflux monitoring studies. The prevalence of GERD is increased in obese patients In overweight and obese patients, the clinical symptoms of GERD are especially present in the supine position and this correlates with more frequent episodes of nocturnal reflux in the 24-h pH monitoring, there is also an increase in the number of refluxes with content acid. In the population with symptoms, digestive endoscopy detects data of erosive esophagitis in 50% of patients, while 24-h pH-impedanciometry diagnoses 92% of patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) The presence of persistent GERD in the mucosa affects esophageal motility and patients may develop ineffective esophageal motility-type disorders, so we will review the interpre-tation of the functional tests that determine motility, which is esophageal manometry, and those that determine reflux gastroesophageal, acid and non-acid, which is the pH measure-ment with or without 24-h impedanciometry.

The clinical effect of benesco™ on reflux symptoms: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases in the western world. Lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) form the basis of the management of GERD. A subset of patients seeks for (natural) alternative therapies besides PPIs. benesco™ is an over-the-counter nutrition based on quercetin which has a presumed positive effect on esophageal barrier function. Therefore we aim to assess the effect of benesco™ on reflux symptoms.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial in participants with reflux symptoms. Participants were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive 6 weeks of benesco™ (three times daily one lozenge containing 200 mg of quercetin) or placebo. The primary outcome was treatment success (≥50% reduction in Reflux Disease Questionnaire Score). Secondary outcomes included GERD-related quality of life, reflux-free days and nights, and participant-reported treatment success.

KEY RESULTS

One hundred participants were randomized. Treatment success was seen in 18 (39%) of 46 participants in the intervention group versus 21 (47%) of 45 in the placebo group (p = 0.468). In the intervention group 10 (1-21) reflux-free days were reported compared to 10 (2-25) in the placebo group (p = 0.673). In addition, 38 (34-41) versus 39 (35-42) reflux-free nights were reported (p = 0.409).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In our trial benesco™ showed no significant benefit over placebo at group level.

Longer-term outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation

Surgical intervention for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has historically been limited to fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a less invasive alternative that was introduced 15 years ago, and it may have a superior side-effect profile. To date, however, there has been just a single published study reporting outcomes in a UK population. This study reports quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and antacid use in patients undergoing MSA, with a particular focus on postoperative symptoms and those with severe reflux. A single-center cohort study was carried out to assess the QOL outcomes and report long-term safety outcomes in patients undergoing MSA. GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scores were collected preoperatively, and immediately postoperatively, at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up time points. All patients underwent preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy, impedance, and manometry. Two hundred and two patients underwent laparoscopic MSA over 9 years. The median preoperative GERD-HRQL score was 31, and the median RSI score was 17. There was a reduction in all scores from preoperative values to each time point, which was sustained at 5-year follow-up; 13% of patients had a preoperative DeMeester score of >50, and their median preoperative GERD-HRQL and RSI scores were 32 and 15.5, respectively. These were reduced to 0 at the most recent follow-up. There was a significant reduction in antacid use at all postoperative time points. Postoperative dilatation was necessary in 7.4% of patients, and the device was removed in 1.4%. Erosion occurred in no patients. MSA is safe and effective at reducing symptom burden and improving QOL scores in patients with both esophageal and laryngopharyngeal symptoms, including those with severe reflux.

Results of the ARROW survey of anti-reflux practice in the United Kingdom

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common, significant health burden. United Kingdom guidance states that surgery should be considered for patients with a diagnosis of GERD not suitable for long-term acid suppression. There is no consensus on many aspects of patient pathways and optimal surgical technique, and an absence of information on how patients are currently selected for surgery. Further detail on the delivery of anti-reflux surgery (ARS) is required. A United Kingdom-wide survey was designed to gather surgeon opinion regarding pre-, peri- and post-operative practice of ARS. Responses were received from 155 surgeons at 57 institutions. Most agreed that endoscopy (99%), 24-hour pH monitoring (83%) and esophageal manometry (83%) were essential investigations prior to surgery. Of 57 units, 30 (53%) had access to a multidisciplinary team to discuss cases; case-loads were higher in those units (median 50 vs. 30, P < 0.024). The most popular form of fundoplication was a Nissen posterior 360° (75% of surgeons), followed by a posterior 270° Toupet (48%). Only seven surgeons stated they had no upper limit of body mass index prior to surgery. A total of 46% of respondents maintain a database of their practice and less than a fifth routinely record quality of life scores before (19%) or after (14%) surgery. While there are areas of consensus, a lack of evidence to support workup, intervention and outcome evaluation is reflected in the variability of practice. ARS patients are not receiving the same level of evidence-based care as other patient groups.

Developments in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease over the Last 40 Years

BACKGROUND

The last 40 years have seen a remarkable change in our understanding of reflux disease.

SUMMARY

These changes encompass disease definition and impact, pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, regulatory oversight of clinical trials, pharmacotherapy, endoscopic, and surgical treatment. We have also seen a number of promising therapies fail.

KEY MESSAGES

The future holds the promise of further advances. Adaptive artificial intelligence will take over diagnostics in manometry and pH impedance testing and patient-driven outcomes may be changed by interactions with artificial intelligence rather than humans. Changes in chip technology will allow higher resolution chips to be carried on smaller devices making extra-esophageal areas where reflux may play a role more accessible to prolonged observation and testing.

Mechanism of spirometry associated gastro-esophageal reflux in individuals undergoing esophageal assessment

Persistent variability observed during spirometry, even when technical and personal factors are controlled, has prompted interest in uncovering its underlying mechanisms. Notably, our prior investigations have unveiled that spirometry has the potential to trigger gastro-esophageal reflux in a susceptible population. This current study embarks on elucidating the intricate mechanisms orchestrating reflux induced by spirometry. To achieve this, we enlisted twenty-four (24) participants exhibiting reflux symptoms for esophageal assessment. These participants underwent two sets of spirometry sessions, interspersed with a 10-minute intermission, during which we closely scrutinized fluid flow dynamics and esophageal function through high-resolution impedance esophageal manometry. Our comprehensive evaluation juxtaposed baseline manometric parameters against their equivalents during the initial spirometry session, the intervening rest period, and the subsequent spirometry session. Remarkably, impedance values, serving as a metric for fluid quantity, exhibited a substantial elevation during each spirometry session and the ensuing recovery interval in the pan-esophageal and hypopharyngeal regions when compared to baseline levels. Additionally, the resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter experienced a noteworthy reduction subsequent to the first bout of spirometry (13.6 ± 8.8 mmHg) in comparison to the baseline pressure (22.5 ± 13.3 mmHg). Furthermore, our observations unveiled a decline in spirometric parameters-FEV1 (0.14 ± 0.24 L, P = 0.042) and PEFR (0.67 L/s, P = 0.34)-during the second spirometry session when contrasted with the first session. Collectively, our study underscores the compelling evidence that spirometry maneuvers can elicit gastro-esophageal reflux by eliciting intra-esophageal pressure differentials and inducing temporary relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Clinical relevance of salivary pepsin detection in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease subtypes

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is heterogeneous with a varied symptom spectrum and reflux profiles. Its definite diagnosis often requires invasive tools including endoscopy or reflux monitoring. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of salivary pepsin detection as a non-invasive screening tool to diagnose GERD of different subtypes.

Methods

A total of 77 patients with suspected GERD symptoms and 12 asymptomatic controls were analysed. All participants performed symptom evaluation, upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-dual pH probe monitoring. Saliva was self-collected across three different time points: at early fasting, postprandially, and at symptom occurrence. Salivary pepsin levels were measured via Peptest. The optimal threshold of salivary pepsin for diagnosing distal or proximal reflux was determined according to a receiver-operating characteristic curve.

Results

The average salivary pepsin concentration of suspected GERD patients was significantly higher than that of controls (100.63 [68.46, 141.38] vs 67.90 [31.60, 115.06] ng/mL, P = 0.044), although no difference was found among patients with different symptom spectrums. The distal reflux group had a higher average pepsin concentration than non-reflux patients (170.54 [106.31, 262.76] vs 91.13 [63.35, 127.63] ng/mL, P = 0.043), while no difference was observed between the distal reflux group and the proximal reflux group. The optimal cut-off value of salivary pepsin concentration for diagnosing pathological distal reflux was 157.10 ng/mL, which was higher than that for diagnosing pathological proximal reflux (122.65 ng/mL). The salivary pepsin concentration was significantly correlated with distal and proximal reflux parameters.

Conclusions

Salivary pepsin measurement can help in identifying true GERD with pathological distal reflux or proximal reflux, regardless of different symptom spectrums. A higher threshold should be applied for diagnosing distal reflux than for proximal reflux.

Is empiric proton pump inhibition in patients with symptoms of extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux justified?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has had a marked increase in Western countries with a paralleling interest in extraesophageal (EE) manifestations of GERD, including laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). There are considerable differences in clinical practice between gastroenterologists, otolaryngologists and pulmonologists.

METHODS

In this narrative review we address some of these controversies concerning EE manifestations of GERD and LPR.

RESULTS

It is disputed whether there is causal relationship between reflux and the numerous symptoms and conditions suggested to be EE manifestations of GERD. Similarly, the pathophysiology is uncertain and there are disagreements concerning diagnostic criteria. Consequently, it is challenging to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations. A significant number of patients are given a trial course with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for several months before symptoms are evaluated. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs PPI treatment does not seem to be advantageous over placebo, and the evidence supporting that patients without verified GERD have any benefit of PPI treatment is negligible. There is a large increase in both over the counter and prescribed PPI use in several countries and a significant proportion of this use is without any symptomatic benefit for the patients. Whereas short-term treatment has few side effects, there is concern about side-effects after long-term use. Although empiric PPI treatment for suspected EE manifestations of GERD instead of prior esophageal 24-hour pH and impedance monitoring is included in several guidelines by various societies, this practice contributes to overtreatment with PPI.

CONCLUSION

We argue that the current knowledge suggests that diagnostic testing with pH and impedance monitoring rather than empiric PPI treatment should be chosen in a higher proportion of patients presenting with symptoms possibly attributable to EE reflux.

Correlation between Psychosomatic Assessment, Heart Rate Variability, and Refractory GERD: A Prospective Study in Patients with Acid Reflux Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects a significant proportion of individuals, with life stress being a contributing factor. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between psychosomatic evaluations, heart rate variability (HRV), and GERD in a cohort of individuals. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the sequencing changes following proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment and identify predictive factors associated with refractory GERD.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 105 individuals with reflux esophagitis and a control group of 50 participants without acid reflux symptoms were enrolled. Psychosomatic evaluations, including GERDQ, GERDQLQ, RSI, BAI, BDI, and SSS-8, were assessed at baseline and during treatment. HRV parameters were also evaluated. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictive factors for refractory GERD. PPIs were administered regularly for the initial 2 months and then used on-demand. Refractory GERD was defined as less than 50% improvement in symptom relief or GERDQLQ score ≥ 20 after 8 weeks of PPI treatment.

RESULTS

The GERD group had higher scores in all psychosomatic evaluations compared to the control group (all p-values < 0.001). There were no significant changes in any parameters of HRV before and after treatment in the GERD group. Strong and consistent correlations were observed between GERD symptoms and psychological scores (BAI, BDI, and SSS-8) across all time points (W0, W4, and W8). Sequential reductions in GERD symptom scores and psychosomatic evaluations were observed during the initial eight weeks of treatment. Higher GERDQ (≥10) and SSS-8 (≥12) scores were predictive of refractory GERD (p = 0.004 and p = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the importance of considering physiological and psychological factors in the management of GERD. Psychosomatic evaluations provide valuable insights for assessing and treating GERD patients. Integrating stress management and comprehensive assessments into personalized treatment strategies is crucial.

The Utility of Symptom Association Probability (SAP) in Predicting Outcome After Laparoscopic Fundoplication in Patients with Abnormal Esophageal Acid Exposure

INTRODUCTION

Abnormal DeMeester score on pH monitoring is a well-established predictor of favorable outcome after antireflux surgery (ARS). Esophageal pH monitoring also facilitates analysis of the temporal association between symptoms and reflux episodes. This association can be expressed with several symptom-reflux association indices with symptom association probability (SAP) being the most reliable. SAP is often used as an adjunct to DeMeester score during preoperative assessment of patients seeking ARS. However, data on the utility of SAP in predicting ARS outcome is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of SAP as an adjunct to DeMeester score in predicting outcomes after fundoplication.

METHODS

Records of patients who underwent primary fundoplication from 2015 to 2021 were reviewed. Patients with a preoperative DeMeester score >14.7 on Bravo pH monitoring were included. A SAP >95% was considered SAP-positive. Favorable outcome was defined as freedom from proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and patient satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. Outcomes were compared based on the presence and number of SAP-positive symptoms, individual typical and atypical SAP-positive symptoms, and within demographic, clinical, and reflux severity subgroups.

RESULTS

The final study population consisted of 597 patients (71.4% female) with a median (IQR) age of 59.0 (49-67). At a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.5 (8) months, 82.0% patients achieved favorable outcome (satisfaction and freedom from PPI), freedom from PPI was 91.7%, and satisfaction was 87.4%. SAP was positive in 430 (72.0%) patients, of which 221 (37.0%) had one SAP-positive symptom, 164 (27.5%) had two SAP-positive symptoms, and 45 (7.5%) had all three SAP-positive symptoms. There was no association between having at least one SAP-positive symptom and favorable outcome (p=0.767). There was no difference in favorable outcome between patients with one, two, or all SAP-positive symptoms (0.785). Outcomes were comparable for SAP-positive typical (p=0.873) and atypical symptoms (p=1.000) and all individual symptoms (p>0.05). Outcomes were also comparable within all subgroups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Symptom association probability with an abnormal DeMeester score did not enhance the prediction of antireflux surgery outcome. These findings suggest that SAP should not be used in surgical decision-making in patients with objective evidence of reflux.

Effect of aging and obesity on esophageal mucosal integrity as measured by baseline impedance

AIM

Low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) values support gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis. Recent data denote that age and obesity may affect MNBI. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic MNBI cutoffs as also the effect of aging and body mass index (BMI) on MNBI.

METHODS

In total 311 patients (M/F: 139/172, mean age: 47 ± 13) referred for typical GERD symptoms that have undertaken both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and pH-Impedance studies off PPI were evaluated. MNBI at 3, 5, and 17 cm over lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were evaluated. GERD was diagnosed if acid exposure time (AET) >6%.

RESULTS

Mean BMI was 26.6 ± 5.9 kg/cm2 . GERD was diagnosed in 39.2% and 13.5% had inconclusive GERD. MNBI was correlated to patients' age, BMI, AET, and the length of LES-CD separation and at 3 cm also to the total number of reflux and LES hypotension. In the multivariate analysis MNBI at 3 and 5 cm was independently correlated only to age, BMI, and AET. Patients with definite GERD showed lower MNBI at 3 cm compared with inconclusive GERD though both showed lower values when compared with GERD absence. At 3 cm MNBI ability for diagnosing GERD was good (0.815, p < 0.001 95% CI: 0.766-0.863) with an optimal cutoff point of 1281 Ohm.

CONCLUSION

According to our study findings age and BMI affect independently lower esophageal MNBI values in patients evaluated for GERD. MNBI significantly aids toward GERD diagnosis though in a real-life setting MNBI values much lower than the one previously proposed should be used.

Can esophageal symptoms be associated with sleep disorders in esophageal rare diseases? A prospective case-control study across achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The association between sleep disorders and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been the subject of several studies; however, quality of sleep has been under investigated in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and achalasia (Ach). This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of sleep disturbances in patients with EoE and Ach compared to GERD patients and their associations with esophageal symptoms.

METHODS

Thirty Ach patients and 20 EoE patients were consecutively enrolled and compared to a control group of 46 GERD patients. All patients underwent a standardized questionnaire investigating the intensity-frequency scores (from 0 to 6) of esophageal symptoms, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire to assess sleep quality, a SF-36 survey to investigate health-related quality of life (both physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scales), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) to assess the presence of depression and anxiety.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sleep disturbances was 66.7% in Ach, 50% in EoE, and 60% in GERD patients (P=0.5). PCS and MCS significantly correlated with depression and anxiety levels. Ach patients showed significantly higher intensity-frequency scores of dysphagia for solids (Scheffè P<0.001) and liquids (Scheffè P<0.001) than EoE and GERD patients. No differences were found in the intensity-frequency scores of the esophageal symptoms among the three groups. There was a significant association between worst quality of sleep and higher intensity-frequency scores of regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep disturbances are common with Ach and EoE, similar to GERD patients. Moreover, there is a significant association between regurgitation, a typical GERD symptom, and poor quality of sleep, independent from diagnosis.

Non-acid reflux and esophageal dysmotility is associated with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated that non-acid reflux (NAR) is associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Esophageal dysmotility is associated with NAR but few studies have focused on the esophageal motility of ESCC patients. We explored the relationship between ESCC, NAR and esophageal dysmotility with the aid of multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) and high-resolution manometry (HRM).

METHODS

From Jan 2021 to Oct 2022, 20 patients with superficial ESCC were enrolled as the ESCC group, while 20 age and gender matched individuals without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and 20 age and gender matched patients with GERD symptoms were recruited as the control groups. Patients received 24 h MII-pH and HRM procedure before endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and the data were then collected to identify the type of reflux and esophageal dysmotility.

RESULTS

Prevalence of esophageal dysmotility was significantly different among the three groups, 75.0% in the ESCC group, 35.0% in the non-GERD group and 70.0% in the GERD group (P = 0.029). NAR episodes at 15 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in the ESCC group were significantly higher than that in the non-GERD group (6.5 (3.5-9.3) vs 1.0 (0.8-4.0), P = 0.001) and were similar with that in the GERD group (6.5 (3.5-9.3) vs 5.5 (3.0-10.5), P > 0.05). NAR episodes at 5 cm above LES was significantly higher in the ESCC group than that in the non-GERD group (38.0 (27.0-60.0) vs 18.0 (11.8-25.8), P = 0.001) and was significantly higher than that in the GERD group (38.0 (27.0-60.0) vs 20.0 (9.8-30.5)), P = 0.010). Prevalence of pathologic non-acid reflux was significantly different among the three groups, 30.0% in the ESCC group, 0.0% in the non-GERD group and 10.0% in the GERD group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study found NAR and esophageal dysfunction frequently occur in ESCC patients. NAR and esophageal dysmotility may be associated with ESCC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200061456.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Symptoms potentially attributable to gastroesophageal reflux disease are among those most commonly reported to primary care providers in the outpatient setting. In this review, we discuss clinical approaches to the evaluation and management of these symptoms, including proton pump inhibitor trials as well as specific indications or clinical settings that warrant referral to Gastroenterology specialists.

The clinical application value of salivary pepsin in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux diseases

BACKGROUND

Peptest is a noninvasive and convenient diagnostic kit for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to explore the application value of Peptest in the diagnosis of GERD.

METHODS

Patients suspected of GERD all completed 24 h pH-impedance monitoring (24 h MII-pH) and then took proton pump inhibitor (PPI) 2 weeks. The postprandial, post-symptom and random salivary samples were taken. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to identify the best cutoff value of Peptest, to differentiate GERD patients from non-GERD patients and the optimal sampling time of Peptest was analyzed. Reflux characteristics and esophageal motility between Peptest (+) group and Peptest (-) group were compared in negative 24 h MII-pH patients. Peptest concentration were compared among non-reflux, distal reflux, and proximal reflux groups according to 24 h MII-pH curve.

RESULTS

The area under the curve of post-symptom Peptest was highest in three time points and the diagnostic specificity was 81.0% and sensitivity was 53.3% with the diagnostic value of 86 ng/mL. Compared with negative Peptest group, distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance was significantly lower, gastroesophageal junction contractile integral was substantially lower in positive Peptest group in negative 24 h MII-pH patients. The concentration of post-symptom and postprandial Peptest increased gradually in the non-reflux, distal reflux, and proximal reflux groups.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Peptest has a relatively low diagnostic value for GERD. Post-symptom Peptset is the best sampling time with the optimal value of 86 ng/mL and may have auxiliary diagnostic value for negative 24 h MII-pH patients. Peptest may assist 24 h MII-pH in monitoring proximal reflux.

A novel modified endoscopic method for treating patients with refractory gastro-esophageal disease and moderate hiatus hernia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) with small hiatus hernia. However, evidence of its applicability in patients with larger hernia sac is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ARMS for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia (3-5 cm) and determine the appropriate resection range.

METHODS

thirty-six patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia were enrolled. They were divided into 2/3 and 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection groups. The patients received modified ARMS. The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) and DeMeester scores, endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring results and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure were compared pre- and post-procedure. Therapeutic effects and complications of the two mucosal resection ranges were analyzed.

RESULTS

thirty-six patients were enrolled in this study, all of whom had undergone ARMS surgery with at least six-month follow-up. In the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, acid exposure time (AET) and DeMeester score improved significantly compared with those before surgery (p < 0.001). In the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, AET and DeMeeter score worsened after six months (p < 0.001), but there was no difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, there was no significant improvement in the ratio of esophagitis grade C/D and LES resting pressure after treatment compared with the baseline values (p > 0.05), and no postoperative bleeding or perforation was observed. The incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis in the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group was lower than that in the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

modified ARMS is effective for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia, but it cannot significantly increase the postoperative resting pressure of the LES. The 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection can reduce the incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis.

Feasibility and Outcomes of Simultaneous Gastric Bypass with Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

BACKGROUND

Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) have a higher incidence in patients with obesity. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with concomitant PEH repair is established as a valid surgical option for PEH management in patients with obesity. The safety and feasibility of this approach in the elderly population are not well elucidated.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65 years and older who underwent simultaneous PEH repair and RYGB from 2008 to 2022. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, postoperative complications, and weight loss data were collected. Obesity-related medical conditions' resolution rates were evaluated at the last follow-up. A matched paired t-test and Pearson's test were used to assess continuous and categorical parameters, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (82.5% female; age, 69.2 ± 3.6 years; BMI, 39.4 ± 4.7 kg/m2) with a mean follow-up of 32.3 months were included. The average hernia size was 5.8 cm. Most cases did not require mesh use during surgery (92.5%) with only 3 (7.5%) hernial recurrences. Postoperative complications (17.5%) and mortality rates (2.5%), as well as readmission (2.5%), reoperation (2.5%), and reintervention (0%) rates at 30-day follow-up were reported. There was a statistically significant resolution in gastroesophageal reflux disease (p < 0.001), hypertension (p = 0.019), and sleep apnea (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of simultaneous PEH repair and RYGB are adequate for the elderly population. Patient selection is crucial to reduce postoperative complications. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to fully assess the impact of this surgery on elderly patients with obesity.

American Foregut Society White Paper on Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease on a spectrum that has an array of management options ranging from lifestyle changes, acid suppressive therapy to laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS). Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is an endoscopic procedure in the management of GERD that re-establishes and augments the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV). TIF is appropriate for patients that do not have a hiatal hernia greater than 2 cm. Patients with a hiatal hernia greater than 2 cm have the option to have either a conventional LARS (laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with complete or partial fundoplication) or a concomitant laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with TIF, known as concomitant TIF (cTIF). This white paper summarizes the published outcome data for TIF 2.0 and cTIF to date and outline the best practice approaches including patient assessment, selection, and management for TIF and cTIF.

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass as a primary and revisional procedure: a single-centre experience

Introduction

To achieve effective weight loss and remission of comorbidities, various surgical methods are used in the treatment of obesity. The most common procedures performed worldwide are followed by the newest ones.

Aim

To present the results of the first group of patients from a high-volume bariatric centre in central Europe and to compare single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) as a primary and revisional procedure.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent SASI for obesity from December 2018 to June 2022 by the same team of surgeons. There were 2 groups of patients. The first group consisted of patients who underwent SASI as their first bariatric procedure (primary group - PG). The second group consisted of patients who underwent SASI after previous SG procedure due to weight regain and/or symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (revisional group - RG).

Results

There were 15 patients (80% female) in the PG, and 14 patients (88% female) in the RG. In the PG, %TWL 12 and 36 months after surgery was 37.8% and 43.9% respectively. In the RG, %TWL 12 and 24 months after surgery was 13.8% and 20.9%, respectively. Most patients had complete remission of T2D and HT after surgery. In the RG, 9 (81.8%) patients had remission of GERD. The worsening of GERD was reported in 4 (40%) patients in the PG.

Conclusions

SASI may be an effective and safe method of treatment of obesity. SASI may be an effective method of revisional bariatric surgery performed for GERD, but not for weight regain.

JCT, Soder RB, Fornari F. The brain-esophagus axis in subjects with and without obesity assessed by esophageal acid perfusion and functional brain imaging

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a complex pathophysiology and a heterogeneous symptom profile. The brain-esophageal axis in GERD has been studied with functional brain imaging during the last decades, but data from obese patients was just recently reported. A comparison of such a group with non-obese subjects is lacking in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate heartburn perception and brain connectivity responses during esophageal acid stimulation in subjects with and without obesity, controlling for the presence of typical reflux symptoms.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 25 patients with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and 46 subjects without obesity underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain with esophageal water and acid perfusion. The fMRI paradigm and connectivity were assessed.

Results

About two-thirds of the participants had reflux symptoms. Heartburn perception during fMRI did not differ between subjects with and without obesity. The presence of reflux symptoms was associated with lower activation in frontal brain regions during acid perfusion compared to water perfusion. Compared to subjects without obesity, patients with obesity presented significantly lower connectivity within the anterior salience network. Corrected clusters included left caudate, left putamen and left anterior cingulate gyrus.

Conclusions

The brain-esophagus axis showed differences between subjects with and without obesity. Even without symptomatic differences following esophageal acid perfusion, patients with reflux symptoms showed less brain activation in frontal areas, while obese individuals presented lower connectivity within the anterior salience network.

Effect of Body Weight and Obesity on Esophageal Function

The incidence of obesity in the population is gradually increasing. Obesity can cause a variety of complications in the digestive system such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, and impacts the integrity of the esophageal mucosal barrier and esophageal motility. However, not many studies have focused on the effect of varying degrees of obesity on the esophagus. A total of 611 participants were included in this study. We divided them into three groups according to their body mass index (BMI): the normal weight group, the overweight group, and the obesity group. We performed a retrospective comparison between groups based on indicators from high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-hour pH impedance monitoring, and did a correlation analysis on multiple indicators such as esophageal mucosal barrier, esophageal motility, and acid reflux. The mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) in the overweight and obesity groups was lower than that in the normal group. The MNBI of the subjects in Z5-Z6 channels in the overweight group was significantly lower than that in the normal group. With respect to Z3-Z6 channels, MNBI values in the obesity group were significantly lower than those in the normal group. 'The acid exposure time (AET), the DeMeester scores (DMS) and 24-hour total reflux episodes was significantly higher in the obesity group than those in the normal and overweight groups. The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) residual pressure, and intrabolus pressure (IBP) in the overweight and obesity groups were significantly higher than those in the normal group. In addition, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, and esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) in the obesity group were significantly higher than those in the normal group. We found that increase in body weight affected the integrity of esophageal mucosa, and different degrees of increase associated with different degrees and different aspects of changes in esophageal motility.

Quality of life and severity of symptoms among patients with various degrees of reflux esophagitis: a prospective study

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause erosive esophagitis (EE) and compromise the quality of life (QoL). We examined differences in symptom severity and QoL according to EE severity grade. A follow-up study was conducted among GERD patients at the Nazareth Hospital in Israel. Patients underwent a baseline gastroscopy in 2014-2020 during which the EE grade was determined using the Los Angeles classification. Follow-up telephone interviews were conducted during 2019-2020 with a mean time interval of 18.9 months (SD = 14.9) after the baseline gastroscopy to assess GERD symptoms using the Reflux disease questionnaire (RDQ) and QoL using the GERD QoL questionnaire. The patients were interviewed in their native language (Arabic or Hebrew). Overall, 149 (66.4% males) patients were included; 50 had EE grades C/D and 99 had grades A/B. The mean age at baseline and follow-up was 44.6 years (SD = 15.1) and 46.2 years (SD = 14.9), respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.928 and 0.855 for the RDQ and QoL questionnaires, respectively. Patients with EE C/D grades had more severe symptoms than patients with EE A/B grades (P = 0.05), especially in regurgitation scores (P = 0.03). Females had more severe symptoms (overall) than males (adjusted OR = 2.34; 95% CI 1.12-4.90). Patients with the more severe esophagitis EE C/D group (adjusted OR = 1.98; 95% CI 0.93-4.24) and those who used PPIs treatment (adjusted OR = 2.19; 95% CI 0.95-5.01) reported more severe GERD symptoms. The number of schooling years was significantly associated with better QoL score (beta coefficient 1.33, P = 0.005) but not EE grade or GERD symptoms. Follow-up endoscopy conducted among 22 patients with EE grades C/D showed that 13 (59.1%) of these patients had normal endoscopic findings, 6 patients (27.3%) had a grade A EE, 1 patient (4.5%) had grade B, and 2 (9.1%) remained with grade C EE. The Arabic and Hebrew versions of the RDQ and QoL questionnaires were highly reliable. GERD symptoms severity was more profound among patients with more severe esophagitis. No significant association between EE grade and QoL; this negative result might be due to the improvement in esophagitis endoscopic findings among patients with C/D grade.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Metrics across Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Dysphagia: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have evaluated the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) with high-resolution manometry (HRM) in some esophageal diseases, but not eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The aim of our study was to evaluate the function of the UES across EoE, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), functional dysphagia (FD), and the relationship with esophageal symptoms, esophageal body contraction, and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics.

METHODS

HRM was performed on 30 EoE, 18 GERD, and 29 FD patients according to the Chicago Classification 3.0. The study data were exported to the online analysis platform Swallow Gateway. The UES was assessed in terms of UES Resting Pressure (UES-RP), UES Basal Pressure (UES-BP), UES Integrated Relaxation Pressure (UES-IRP), UES Relaxation Time (UES-RT), Basal UES Contractile Integral (Basal UES-CI), Post-Deglutitive UES Contractile Integral (Post-Deglutitive UES-CI), and Proximal Contractile Integral (PCI).

RESULTS

ANOVA analysis showed significantly higher values of Post-Deglutitive UES-CI in EoE patients compared with FD patients (p = 0.001). Basal UES-CI and UES-RP showed significantly higher values in EoE (p = 0.002, p = 0.038) and GERD (p < 0.001, p = 0.001) patients compared with FD patients. Correlations between LES-CI and Post-Deglutitive UES-CI, Basal UES-CI, and UES-RP (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.017, respectively), and between LES-BP and Post-Deglutitive UES-CI (p = 0.019), independent of diagnosis, were shown. No correlations have been demonstrated between the UES, EGJ metrics, and esophageal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Some differences in UES metrics in the three different diseases were found. Further studies are needed to confirm the results of our pilot study and possible applications in clinical practice.

Comparison of RDQ and GERDQ for Predicting Erosive Esophagitis in Patients with Typical GERD Symptoms

Background/Aims

The management decisions regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may differ according to the presence of erosive esophagitis. On the other hand, the availability of upper endoscopy in Indonesia is relatively limited. This study compared the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and the GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) performance in predicting the presence of clinically significant erosive esophagitis and determined the validity and reliability of the Indonesian-translated version of RDQ.

Methods

Ninety-two adults with GERD suspicion were recruited. All patients completed RDQ and GERDQ. Receiver operating curve analysis was conducted on RDQ and GERDQ to evaluate their performance in discriminating LA GERD B or higher esophagitis from others. The translated RDQ preserved its main structure and was culturally adapted.

Results

The patients were 66.3% female and 73.9% Javanese. Only 22 (23.9%) patients presented with LA grade B or higher erosive esophagitis. The RDQ showed a higher AUC than the GERDQ (0.602 vs. 0.589). A cutoff point of 20 was selected for the RDQ with sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 50%, respectively, whereas the optimal cutoff point of GERDQ was 8, with a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 43%, respectively. The r-value greater than the critical value table (r>0.205, p<0.01) confirmed the construct validity of our translated RDQ. The questionnaire also demonstrated excellent reliability (α=0.900) and moderate similarity with the Indonesian version of GERDQ (κ=0.459, p<0.01).

Conclusions

The RDQ is slightly superior to GERDQ in predicting the presence of clinically significant erosive esophagitis (LA grade B or higher). The Indonesian-translated RDQ is valid and reliable.

Diagnostic Value of Pepsin Measurements in Dysphonia Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic value of pepsin test in detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with suspected LPR-induced dysphonia.

METHODS

Dysphonic and non-dysphonic patients with LPR at the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) were recruited from January 2019 to November 2022. Patients collected saliva/sputum samples to measure pepsin concentrations. Symptoms and findings were studied through reflux symptom score (RSS) and reflux sign assessment (RSA). Voice quality was assessed with maximum phonation time, GRBAS, voice handicap index (VHI), and acoustic parameters at baseline and 3-month post-treatment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of pepsin tests for dysphonia-related to LPR were calculated at ≥16 ng/mL cutoff. The relationship between HEMII-pH, clinical features, voice quality outcomes, and pepsin measurement was investigated.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with LPR at the HEMII-pH completed the evaluations accounting for 30 patients consulting for dysphonia. Dysphonic patients reported higher RSS than non-dysphonic patients. RSS, RSA, laryngeal findings, VHI, and grade of dysphonia significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment. Pepsin test detected LPR in 73% of dysphonic cases. The pepsin test was 73.3 sensitive and 18.9 specific when considering the highest pepsin level of morning, postlunch, and postdinner sputum collections. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV varied regarding the time of sputum collections. There was a strong significant association between the concentration of the morning pepsin test and the severity of laryngeal RSA score (P = 0.018). The morning pepsin saliva test concentration was predictive of the 3-month otolaryngological RSS (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Pepsin test is a sensitive but poorly specific diagnostic approach for patients with dysphonia attributed to LPR. Multiple pepsin measurements may increase the sensitivity and predictive value of pepsin test. Future large-cohort studies are needed to investigate the accuracy of pepsin test in this population.

Dental evaluation is helpful in the differentiation of functional heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Heartburn is identically the key symptom of both, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and functional heartburn (FHB), making the differential diagnosis resource-intensive. Oral manifestations of GERD can be easily examined; therefore, their exploration might be a cheap, widely available, and useful tool in the differentiation of GERD and FHB.

AIM

To evaluate the prevalence of dental erosions (DE) and periodontal diseases (PD) in patients with heartburn and their association with GERD and FHB.

METHODS

A total of 116 [M/F: 51/65, mean age: 54 (17-80) years] consecutive patients with heartburn were enrolled for detailed esophageal function and orodental examinations.

RESULTS

Dental disorders were detected in 89% (103/116). Patients with PD + DE had significantly more often pathologic reflux (90.0% vs 27.8%; P < 0.05), higher esophagitis scores (1.8 vs 0.9; P < 0.05), and a significantly different mean impedance curve (P = 0.04) than those without any dental diseases. The opposite approach established that patients with GERD had significantly higher prevalence of DE and PD, especially if both were present (28.9% vs 2.0%; P < 0.01), more severe PD (1.5 vs 1.0; P < 0.01), and longer history of heartburn (15 years vs 9 years; P < 0.01) than those with FHB.

CONCLUSION

The dental evaluation of patients with heartburn seems to be useful in the differential diagnosis of GERD and FHB. Among the studied parameters, the co-appearance of DE and PD seems to be the best predictor of GERD, whereas the absence of dental disorders was mostly observed in FHB.

Esophageal Mucosal Resistance in Reflux Esophagitis: What We Have Learned So Far and What Remains to Be Learned

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has the highest prevalence among diseases of the digestive system and is characterized by a significant decrease in patients' quality of life, comparable to arterial hypertension and coronary heart disease. One in every ten cases of reflux esophagitis leads to the formation of Barrett's esophagus, which is associated with a high risk of esophagus adenocarcinoma. The key factors determining the progression of the disease are the frequency and duration of the reflux of the stomach's contents. As a result, refluxate, which includes hydrochloric acid, pepsin, and, in the case of concomitant duodeno-gastric reflux, bile acids and lysolecithin, is thrown into the overlying sections of the digestive tract. At the same time, in addition to aggression factors, it is necessary to take into account the state of resistance in the esophageal mucosa to the effects of aggressive refluxate molecules. This review was prepared using systematized data on the protective properties of the esophageal mucosa and modern methods to assess the mucosal barrier in reflux esophagitis. Lesions of the epithelial barrier structure in the esophagus are recognized as the main pathogenetic factor in the development of reflux esophagitis and are a potentially significant therapeutic target in the treatment of GERD and Barrett's esophagus. This article presents the characteristics of the esophageal mucosal barrier and the protective mechanisms of the esophagus's mucous membrane in conditions of gastroesophageal reflux. Diagnostic approaches for assessing the course of reflux esophagitis are described for both histological criteria and the possibility of a comprehensive assessment of the state of mucins, tight-junction proteins, and the proliferative activity of the mucosa, including under the conditions of ongoing therapy.

GERD as a Complication of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of obesity is increasing in developed societies, and surgical treatment is one treatment option. The most common surgical treatment for obesity is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a complication of both obesity and the surgical treatment of obesity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, the PubMed database was searched using the keywords "GERD" and "bariatric surgery", and 987 papers published between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2022 were retrieved.

RESULTS

Nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The articles were analyzed for the de novo occurrence of GERD after the treatment of its symptoms, the occurrence of erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. In addition, interesting conclusions are presented from the papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria but shed light on the pathophysiology of GERD in obese patients undergoing LSG.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the authors draw attention to the need for endoscopic surveillance in patients undergoing LSG, even in the absence of clinical signs of GERD.

The potential of a polyglycolic acid sheet for preventing intrathoracic sleeve migration

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be a consequence of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Intrathoracic sleeve migration (ITSM) is a factor contributing to its development. This study aimed to investigate whether the occurrence of ITSM can be prevented by applying a polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet around the His angle.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 46 consecutive patients who underwent LSG were divided into two groups: Group A - our standard LSG in the first half (n = 23) and Group B - our standard LSG with PGA sheet covering the angle of His in the second half (n = 23). We compared the two groups for one-year postoperative GERD and the incidence of ITSM.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of patient background, operation time, and one-year postoperative total body weight loss, and no adverse effects related to the PGA sheet were observed. Group B had a significantly lower incidence of ITSM than Group A, and the rate of acid-reducing medicine usage was less pronounced in Group B during follow-up (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that applying a PGA sheet can be safe and effective in reducing postoperative ITSM and preventing exacerbations of postoperative GERD.

Endoscopic measurement of hiatal hernias: is it reliable and does it have a clinical impact? Results from a large prospective database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to compare the results of endoscopy and manometry with regard to the presence and longitudinal size of hiatal hernias using a cohort of patients with PPI-refractory reflux symptoms. In addition, we aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of hiatal hernias and their size in relation to the occurrence of GERD.

METHODS

Five hundred patients with suspected GERD due to typical reflux symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) and inadequate response to PPI therapy underwent standardized screening at a reflux center. After 2 weeks of PPI withdrawal, all patients underwent endoscopy, 24-h pH impedance measurement, and high-resolution manometry (HRM). Both endoscopy and HRM results were available for 487 patients.

RESULTS

There was a high correlation between the endoscopic and manometric measured longitudinal size of hernias (rho = .768 (p < .001)). Absolute differences differ on a small effect basis (Cohen's d = 0.23). The presence of hernias increases significantly with the severity of GERD, regardless of whether the hernia was diagnosed by endoscopy or manometry.

CONCLUSION

In summary, endoscopically and manometrically measured hiatal hernia size are highly significantly correlated. Patients with refractory reflux symptoms and a hernia size of 4 cm are very likely to have GERD. In the future, this finding could greatly simplify the diagnosis of GERD.

Saliva pepsin measurements in the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To study the diagnostic value of salivary pepsin measurement (Peptest) for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients.

METHODS

Patients with reflux symptoms were consecutively recruited from January 2020 to November 2022. Patients benefited from hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH), fasting and bedtime saliva collections to measure pepsin. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were evaluated for GERD and LPR patients considering the highest values of pepsin tests at ≥ 16, ≥ 75, and ≥ 216 ng/mL cutoffs. The relationship between HEMII-pH, endoscopic and clinical findings, and pepsin measurements was studied.

RESULTS

Saliva was collected in 109 LPR patients and 30 individuals with both LPR and GERD. The total number of pharyngeal reflux events was significantly higher in GERD-LPR patients compared with LPR patients (p = 0.008). The mean fasting and bedtime pepsin saliva concentrations were similar between groups. The sensitivity of Peptest in LPR patients was 30.5%, 70.2%, and 84.0% at cutoffs ≥ 16, ≥ 75 and ≥ 216 ng/mL. In GERD-LPR group, Peptest was 80.0%, 70.0%, and 30.0% sensitive. At cutoff 16 ng/mL, Peptest reported PPV of 20.7% and 94.8% in LPR-GERD and LPR groups, respectively. NPV were 73.9% and 8.7% in GERD-LPR and LPR groups, respectively. The consistency analysis between Peptest and HEMII-pH was not significant. Peptest was significantly associated with the number of acid pharyngeal reflux events (rs = 0.182; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Pepsin saliva measurements appear to be not a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of GERD in LPR patients. Future studies are needed to determine the place of Peptest in laryngopharyngeal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux diseases.

Long versus short peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: results of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become standard treatment for achalasia with comparable efficacy to surgery. In most of published series, the length of myotomy is 12-13 cm. Shorter cuts could have the advantage of shorter procedure time and possibly reduced gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) rate.

DESIGN

This single-centre, patient-blinded, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trial included 200 patients, who were randomly allocated, to receive either a long-POEM (13 cm; 101 patients) or a short-POEM (8 cm; 99 patients). Primary outcome was defined as an Eckardt symptom score of ≤3 at 24 months after the procedure; a non-inferiority design was chosen with an accepted success range of 6% between the two treatments. Secondary outcomes included operating time, complication rate, postoperative manometry, GORD rate and quality of life.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, clinical success rates were 89.1% in the long-POEM and 98.0% in the short-POEM group, resulting in an absolute between-group difference of -8.9% (90% CI -14.5 to -3.3).Procedure time was significantly reduced in the short-POEM as compared with the long-POEM group (40 vs 50 min, p<0.0001). Severe adverse events occurred in one patient in both groups.No differences were observed in postoperative GORD: acid exposure >6% on pH monitoring study at 6 months was seen in 34.3% (long-POEM) vs 31.1% (short-POEM), while endoscopic oesophagitis was diagnosed in 37.6% vs 51.5% at 6 months and in 21% vs 24.5% at 24 months. Regular proton pump inhibitor use was not different either (36.8% vs 37.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates non-inferiority of a shorter cut length of POEM as compared with the standard treatment, which saved some procedural time. GORD rate was not reduced by reducing cutting length.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03450928.

Proximal esophageal impedance baseline increases the yield of impedance-pH monitoring for GERD diagnosis and is associated with heartburn response to PPI

BACKGROUND

Impairment of esophageal mucosal integrity as assessed by low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) measured in the distal esophagus increases the diagnostic yield of impedance-pH in patients with inconclusive GERD diagnosis as defined by Lyon criteria.

AIM

To assess the diagnostic yield of MNBI measurement in the proximal esophagus, and its relationship with PPI response.

METHODS

Expert review of off-therapy impedance-pH tracings from consecutive patients with heartburn, 80 responders and 80 non-responders to label-dose PPI. Data were compared to those from 36 healthy controls using ROC analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to measure the strength of association of MNBI with PPI response.

RESULTS

A threshold value of 2665 Ω was defined for proximal MNBI by ROC analysis, affording 91.7% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity. Proximal and distal MNBI were significantly lower in non-responder cases as compared to responders. Adding proximal MNBI positivity to pathologic (>6%) acid exposure time (AET) and positive symptom-reflux association, the proportion of patients with abnormal impedance-pH findings increased from 74/160 (46%) to 106/160 (66.3%) (p = 0.0016). Among the 12 patients with pathologic proximal MNBI as the only positive impedance-pH finding, 9 cases (75%) were PPI responders. According to multivariate analysis, AET and pathological distal and proximal MNBI were significantly associated with PPI response, the strongest association observed for proximal MNBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Impedance baseline assessment in the proximal esophagus may increase the diagnostic yield of impedance-pH monitoring. Heartburn response to PPI is directly related to ultrastructural mucosal damage in the distal and in the proximal esophagus as well.

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a randomized sham-controlled study

BACKGROUND : Endoscopic full-thickness plication (EFTP) has shown promising results in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but its efficacy in GERD after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is unclear. METHODS : In a prospective, randomized trial of post-POEM patients dependent on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for documented GERD, patients underwent EFTP (plication to remodel the gastroesophageal flap valve) or an endoscopic sham procedure (positioning of the EFTP device, but no stapling). The primary end point was improvement in acid exposure time (AET) < 6 % (3 months). Secondary end points included improvement in esophagitis (3 months), GERD Questionnaire (GERDQ) score (3 and 6 months), and PPI usage (6 months). RESULTS : 60 patients were randomized (30 in each group). At 3 months, a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved improvement in AET < 6 % in the EFTP group compared with the sham group (69.0 % [95 %CI 52.1-85.8] vs. 10.3 % [95 %CI 0-21.4], respectively). EFTP was statistically superior to sham (within-group analysis) in improving esophageal AET, DeMeester Score, and all reflux episodes (P < 0.001). A nonsignificant improvement in esophagitis was noted in the EFTP group (P = 0.14). Median GERDQ scores (3 months) were significantly better (P < 0.001) in the EFTP group, and the same trend continued at 6 months. A higher proportion of patients in the sham group continued to use PPIs (72.4 % [95 %CI 56.1-88.7] vs. 27.6 % [95 %CI 11.3-43.8]). There were no major adverse events in either group. CONCLUSION : EFTP improved post-POEM GERD symptoms, 24-hour pH impedance findings with normalization in one-third, and reduced PPI usage at 6 months.

Risk factors for functional dyspepsia, erosive and non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Conflicting data exists regarding risk factors associated with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Functional Dyspepsia (FD). Few studies examine anxiety/depression in relation to GERD phenotypes (Esophagitis/EE, and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease/NERD), FD, and Rome-IV syndromes. Our aim was to evaluate the association between epidemiological factors and comorbidities with GERD phenotypes, FD, and Rome-IV syndromes, as well as their relationship with anxiety/depression.

METHODS

338 subjects were selected from 357 patients referred to three tertiary-centers for endoscopic evaluation. Every subject was interviewed individually to administer three validated questionnaires: GERD-Q, Rome-IV and HADS.

RESULTS

45/338 patients were controls, 198/58.6% classified as GERD, 81/24.0% EE (49/14.5% symptomatic, and 32/9.5% asymptomatic), 117/34.6% NERD, 176/52.1% FD (43/12.7% epigastric pain syndrome, 36/10.7% postprandial distress syndrome, and 97/28.7% overlapping syndrome). 81 patients were mixed GERD-FD. Multivariate analysis found significant independent associations: age in NERD and FD; sex in EE, asymptomatic EE and FD; body mass index in NERD and FD; alcohol in EE; anxiety/depression in FD; use of calcium channel antagonists in EE; and inhalers in FD. We compared controls vs different groups/subgroups finding significantly more anxiety in NERD, FD, all Rome-IV syndromes, and mixed GERD-FD; more depression in FD, overlapping syndrome, and mixed GERD-FD; and higher levels of anxiety+depression in NERD, FD, overlapping syndrome, and mixed GERD-FD.

CONCLUSIONS

NERD and FD share demographic and psychopathological risk factors which suggests that they may form part of the same pathophysiological spectrum. Regarding NERD anxiety was predominant, and in FD anxiety+depression, suggesting that both processes may require complementary psychological therapy.

Proton Pump Inhibitor-unresponsive Laryngeal Symptoms Are Associated With Psychological Comorbidities and Sleep Disturbance: A Manometry and Impedance-pH Monitoring Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Laryngeal symptoms are largely treated with empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy if no apparent pathology shown on ear, nose, and throat evaluation and reflux-related etiologies are suspected. However, treatment response remains unsatisfactory. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and physiological characteristics of patients with PPI-refractory laryngeal symptoms.

METHODS

Patients with persistent laryngeal symptoms despite PPI treatment for ≥ 8 weeks were recruited. A multidisciplinary evaluation comprising validated questionnaires for laryngeal symptoms (reflux symptom index [RSI]), gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, psychological comorbidity (5-item brief symptom rating scale [BSRS-5]) and sleep disturbance (Pittsburgh sleep quality index [PSQI]), esophagogastroduodenoscopy, ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring, and high-resolution impedance manometry were performed. Healthy asymptomatic individuals were also recruited for comparison of psychological morbidity and sleep disturbances.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven adult patients and 48 healthy volunteers were analyzed. The patients had markedly higher prevalence of psychological distress (52.6% vs 2.1%, P < 0.001) and sleep disturbance (82.5% vs 37.5%, P < 0.001) than the healthy volunteers. There were significant correlations between RSI and BSRS-5 scores, and between RSI and PSQI scores (r = 0.26, P = 0.010, and r = 0.29, P = 0.004, respectively). Fifty-eight patients had concurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. They had more prominent sleep disturbances (89.7% vs 71.8%, P < 0.001) than those with laryngeal symptoms alone but similar reflux profiles and esophageal motility.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI-refractory laryngeal symptoms are mostly associated with psychological comorbidities and sleep disturbances. Recognition of these psychosocial comorbidities may help optimize management in these patients.

Acid exposure time is sensitive for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease and is associated with long-term survival after lung transplant

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients who have undergone lung transplantation and is associated with poorer outcomes, but guidelines are lacking to direct management strategies in this population. We assessed the diagnostic yield of impedance metrics compared to pH-metry alone for detecting GERD among lung transplant recipients and evaluated their association with clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation. Demographic data, acid exposure time (AET), number of reflux episodes, mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), post-reflux swallowing-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI), and clinical outcomes including mortality were collected. The relationship between GERD metrics and clinical outcomes was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Of the 76 patients studied, 29 (38%) had GERD based on abnormal AET after lung transplantation. One (1.3%) patient had GERD based on elevated number of reflux episodes and abnormal distal MNBI detected GERD in 19 (26%) patients, resulting in 62% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Two (2.6%) patients had normal PSPWI. Patients with low distal MNBI had significantly decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 3-year posttransplant compared to those without low distal MNBI (P = 0.03). Three-year survival was significantly worse among patients with elevated AET (66.7% vs. 89.1%, P = 0.03) but not with low distal MNBI (68.4% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.18). Abnormal AET is more sensitive for detecting GERD than other reflux metrics studied and is associated with survival, suggesting pH-metry alone may be sufficient to guide GERD management after lung transplant.

Lemborexant Attenuates Regurgitation without Worsening Objective Parameters on Reflux Monitoring in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Insomnia: A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Study

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal hypersensitivity is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Since sleep disturbance causes esophageal hypersensitivity, hypnotics may ameliorate GERD. However, zolpidem prolongs esophageal acid clearance. Lemborexant is a new hypnotic with higher efficacy and fewer adverse events than zolpidem. Therefore, the present study investigated the effects of lemborexant on GERD.

METHODS

Patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation and insomnia who did not take acid suppressants or hypnotics in the last month were recruited. Symptom assessments using GerdQ and reflux monitoring were performed before and after a 28-day treatment with 5 mg lemborexant at bedtime. The primary outcome was a change in the total GerdQ score, excluding the score for insomnia. Secondary outcomes were changes in each GerdQ score and the following parameters on reflux monitoring: the acid exposure time (AET), number of reflux events (RE), acid clearance time (ACT), and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (age 45.0 [33.3-56.0], 11 females [68.8%]) completed the intervention (1 patient did not tolerate the second reflux monitoring). The total GerdQ score, excluding the score for insomnia, did not significantly change (8.0 [6.0-9.0] before vs. 7.0 [6.3-9.0] after p = 0.16). GerdQ showed the significant attenuation of regurgitation (2.0 [2.0-3.0] vs. 1.0 [0-2.8] p = 0.0054) but not heartburn (2.5 [1.0-3.0] vs. 1.0 [0.3-2.0] p = 0.175). No significant differences were observed in AET, RE, ACT, or PSPW index before and after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Lemborexant attenuated regurgitation without the worsening of objective reflux parameters. A randomized placebo-controlled study is warranted in the future.

Proximal reflux frequency not correlated with atypical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms

Though most known for heartburn and regurgitation, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is attributed to countless atypical, extra-esophageal (EE) manifestations like cough and throat clearing. While GERD has been studied extensively, the relationship between reflux character and symptom manifestation remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine proximal reflux frequency and its relationship with typical or atypical symptoms. 540 (75.1% female, 24.9% male) pH-impedance monitoring studies from the last 3-years were divided by symptom indication and retrospectively reviewed for proximal reflux frequency, total acid exposure time, mean nocturnal baseline impedance, and total reflux episodes in both abnormal and normal, and borderline studies. Baseline characteristics were also collected. Both total reflux events and mean proximal reflux frequency were found to differ significantly between those with typical versus atypical symptoms. Total reflux events [median (IQR)] were 43.5 (24.0-74.0) in typical patients and 35.0 (20.0-57.0) in atypical patients (P-value 0.0369). Proximal reflux frequency [median (IQR)] was 12.0 (4.0-19.0) typical and 7.0 (3.0-17.0) atypical (P-value 0.0348). Results for exclusively abnormal studies also favored typical patients but not significantly. Baseline characteristics and use of gastric acid control did not differ significantly. Proximal reflux frequency was observed to increase among those with typical GERD symptoms. Total acid reflux events were also significantly higher on average with typical patients. Our findings that proximal reflux frequency is reduced in patients with atypical symptoms compared with patients with typical symptoms suggest that proximal reflux exposure may play a significant role in the symptom presentation of typical classic heartburn and regurgitation symptoms. The differential diagnosis for atypical EE symptoms is vast and can be multifactorial. Our results indicate proximal reflux events may contribute to atypical EE symptoms less than previously reported.

The Effect of Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Compared with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Symptoms and Quality of Life Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). We aimed to evaluate the effect of revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on GERD, compared with revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) METHODS: A retrospective single-center study of a prospectively maintained patient registry (2018-2022). All patients with GERD undergoing OAGB and RYGB after SG were retrieved and included in the study.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight SG patients had conversion to OAGB (n=31) and RYGB (n=47). Baseline characteristics were similar except age (43.8±11.5 vs. 50.3±13.4 years; p=0.03), body mass index (39.9±8.8 vs. 30.6±6 kg/m2; p<0.001), time interval (8±2.7 vs. 6.4±3.4 years; p=0.01), and sleep apnea (29% vs 8.5%; p=0.01), respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in number of patients consuming proton pump inhibitors (70.1% vs. 72.3%; p=0.66), GERD-health-related quality of life (HRQL) score (9.6±7.2 vs. 13.1±8; p=0.06), and pathological endoscopic findings (48.4% vs. 46.8%; p=0.89). Major complication rates were 0% vs. 8.5% (p=0.09). At 32.4 months follow-up, total weight loss was 22%±12.9 and 4.4%±14.6 (p<0.001), GERD resolution 77.4% and 91.9% (p=0.03), HRQL scoring improved to 1.7±4.5 and 1.7±2.7; p=0.94 for OAGB and RYGB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SG conversion to RYGB provides better chances for definitive treatment of GERD. OAGB results in good symptom resolution and improved quality of life and may be considered for post-SG GERD treatment. The most appropriate solution should be individualized to each patient.

Encouraging appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors: existing initiatives and proposals for the future

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have revolutionized the management of acid-related disorders, representing today the mainstay treatment of these conditions. However, despite their large range of indications and usefulness, the remarkable expansion of their use in the last two decades cannot be explained by the increasing prevalence of acid-related diseases only. An inappropriate prescription for clinical conditions in which the pathogenetic role of acid has not been documented has been described, with the natural consequence of increasing the costs and the potential risk of iatrogenic harm due to adverse events and complications recently emerged.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize current indications of PPIs administration, potential adverse events associated with their chronic utilization, and misuse of PPIs. Moreover, we describe existing and possible initiatives for improving the use of PPIs, and some proposals for the future.

EXPERT OPINION

PPI deprescribing is the preferred and most effective approach to reduce the use of PPIs, rather than adopting sharp discontinuation, probably due to fewer withdrawal symptoms. Nonetheless, large knowledge gaps still exist in clinical practice regarding the optimal approach of PPI deprescribing in various clinical scenarios. Further prospective well-designed international studies are eagerly warranted to improve our perspectives on controlling global PPI inappropriate use.

Predicting reflux symptom recurrence: The impact of gastroesophageal junction indicators and body mass index among outpatients

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the prediction model in predicting reflux symptom recurrence among outpatients with reflux esophagitis (RE). A total of 261 outpatients diagnosed with RE complicated by anatomical alterations at the gastroesophageal junction and reflux symptoms were included in the study. Through follow-up, patients were divided into a General group (149 cases) and a Recurrent group (112 cases). Receiver operating characteristic curves of the related factors and prediction model were analyzed to compare the efficacy of each element in predicting reflux recurrence. A prediction model was constructed for predicting reflux recurrence using the axial length of the hiatal hernia (HH), the diameter of the esophageal hiatus, Hill classification, and body mass index (BMI) as risk factors. The cutoff values of the aforementioned factors for predicting reflux recurrence were: an axial length of HH >2 cm, esophageal hiatus diameter ≥3 cm, Hill grade >III, and BMI >25.1 kg/m². The multivariate prediction model constructed using the aforementioned four indicators together with chronic atrophic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection had the area under the curve of 0.801 (95% confidence interval: 0.748-0.854), and the cutoff value of 46.8 had a sensitivity and specificity of 71.4% and 75.8%, respectively. The predictive model in the present study can be used for the primary assessment of reflux recurrence in patients with RE.

Anxiety correlates with excessive air swallowing and PPI refractoriness in patients with concomitant symptoms of GERD and functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Anxiety may exacerbate GERD and FD symptoms perception and reduce quality of life. As many as 50% of patients with GERD symptoms have incomplete relief with PPI therapy, and psychological factors may influence PPI responsiveness.

AIM

The potential relationship between anxiety, excessive air swallowing, and PPI responsiveness was evaluated.

METHODS

GERD patients with concomitant FD were prospectively evaluated. Validated structured questionnaires were used to evaluate anxiety, GERD, and FD symptoms. All patients were treated, within the previous year, with at least 8 weeks of standard dose PPI therapy.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one patients were included. Frequency of non-responders in patients with moderate/severe anxiety was significantly higher compared to patients with mild anxiety (62.7% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.01). Patients with moderate/severe anxiety displayed a significantly higher mean FD symptoms score value compared to patients with mild anxiety. A significantly higher mean number of air swallows were observed in patients with moderate/severe anxiety. At ROC analysis, air swallows and mixed reflux episodes were significantly associated with the presence of PPI refractoriness (AUC: 0.725, 95% CI: 0.645-0.805 and 0.768, 0.692-0.843). According to univariate analysis, an abnormal number of air swallows, mixed reflux episodes and presence of moderate/severe anxiety was significantly associated with PPI refractoriness.

CONCLUSION

Our results, if confirmed in in a larger, prospective clinical and therapeutic study, demonstrate the usefulness of an up-front evaluation with anxiety questionnaire and esophageal testing in patients with a broad spectrum of upper gastrointestinal symptoms who fail to respond to PPI treatment, supporting the option of alternative treatment modalities.

Prospective clinical cohort study: low incidence of Barrett esophagus but high rate of reflux disease at 5-year follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease seems more frequent after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Retrospective case series have raised concerns about a high incidence of Barrett esophagus (BE) after LSG.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective clinical cohort study compared the incidence of BE ≥5 years after LSG and LRYGB.

SETTING

St. Clara Hospital, Basel, and University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from 2 bariatric centers where preoperative gastroscopy is standard practice and LRYGB is preferred for patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease. At follow-up ≥5 years after surgery, patients underwent gastroscopy with quadrantic biopsies from the squamocolumnar junction and metaplastic segment. Symptoms were assessed using validated questionnaires. Wireless pH measurement assessed esophageal acid exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients were included, with a median 7.0 ± 1.5 years after surgery. In the LSG group (n = 83), 3 patients had endoscopically and histologically confirmed de novo BE; in the LRYGB group (n = 86), there were 2 patients with BE, 1 de novo and 1 preexisting (de novo BE, 3.6% versus 1.2%; P = .362). At follow-up, reflux symptoms were reported more frequently by the LSG group than by the LRYGB group (51.9% versus 10.5%). Similarly, moderate-to-severe reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles grade B-D) was more common (27.7% versus 5.8%) despite greater use of proton pump inhibitors (49.4% versus 19.7%), and pathologic acid exposure was more frequent in patients who underwent LSG than in patients who underwent LRYGB.

CONCLUSIONS

After at least 5 years of follow-up, a higher incidence of reflux symptoms, reflux esophagitis, and pathologic esophageal acid exposure was found in patients who underwent LSG compared with patients who underwent LRYGB. However, the incidence of BE after LSG was low and not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Gastroesophageal Junction and Pylorus Distensibility Before and After Sleeve Gastrectomy-pilot Study with EndoFlipTM

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric surgical intervention worldwide. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequently observed after SG and is a relevant clinical problem. This prospective study investigated the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and pyloric sphincter by impedance planimetry (EndoFlipTM) and their association with GERD at a tertiary university hospital center. Between January and December 2018, patients undergoing routine laparoscopic SG had pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments of the GEJ and pyloric sphincter by EndoFlipTM. The distensibility index (DI) was measured at different volumes and correlated with GERD (in accordance with the Lyon consensus guidelines). Nine patients were included (median age 48 years, preoperative BMI 45.1 kg/m2, 55.6% female). GERD (de novo or stable) was observed in 44.4% of patients one year postoperatively. At a 40-ml filling volume, DI increased significantly pre- vs. post-SG of the GEJ (1.4 mm2/mmHg [IQR 1.1-2.6] vs. 2.9 mm2/mmHg [2.6-5.3], p VALUE=0.046) and of the pylorus (6.0 mm2/mmHg [4.1-10.7] vs. 13.1 mm2/mmHg [7.6-19.2], p VALUE=0.046). Patients with postoperative de novo or stable GERD had a significantly increased preoperative DI at 40 ml of the GEJ (2.6 mm2/mmHg [1.9-3.5] vs. 0.5 mm2/mmHg [0.5-1.1], p VALUE=0.031). There was no significant difference in DI at 40 mL filling in the preoperative pylorus and postoperative GEJ or pylorus. In this prospective study, the DI of the GEJ and the pylorus significantly increased after SG. Postoperative GERD was associated with a significantly higher preoperative DI of the GEJ but not of the pylorus.

Inflammatory map of the gastroduodenal mucosa in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The role of H. pylori infection

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

The gastric mucosa has been studied since the pre-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) era, but the complete descriptions of the stomach and duodenum have been anecdotal, and those of the distal duodenum, exceptional. Our aim was to evaluate the different epidemiologic characteristics and the gastroduodenal inflammatory status in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 138 patients divided into: the non-ulcer group (functional dyspepsia [n = 77] and GERD [n = 27]) and the ulcer group (peptic ulcer [n = 13] and duodenal ulcer [n = 21]). Ten biopsy samples (2 from the corpus, 3 from the antrum, 3 from the proximal duodenum, and 2 from the distal duodenum) were taken in each patient for histologic and/or microbiologic study.

RESULTS

The prevalence of dyspepsia, functional dyspepsia, and H. pylori was 80.4%, 69.4%, and 82.6%, respectively. The frequency of superficial chronic gastritis in the corpus was significantly higher in the ulcer group vs. the non-ulcer group, whereas there was more chronic atrophic gastritis in the antrum in the ulcer group (P < 0.05). Duodenitis was significantly more frequent in the ulcer group vs. the non-ulcer group, in both the proximal and distal duodenum. Pangastroduodenitis was a significant finding in the ulcer group. In both groups, chronic gastritis (corpus and antrum) and duodenitis (proximal and distal) were significantly related to the presence of H. pylori. Proximal duodenitis is not an uncommon finding in functional dyspepsia (37.7%) and is twice as frequent as distal duodenitis (16.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ulcer group presented with a gastroduodenal inflammatory map different from that of the non-ulcer group and was characterized by a higher frequency of superficial chronic gastritis in the corpus, chronic atrophic gastritis in the antrum, and a very high frequency of proximal duodenitis.