2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

Predictors of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) is a predictor of ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. We conducted a prospective cohort study to identify variables related to HPR in acute coronary syndrome patients who are at high thrombotic risk. We enrolled 463 patients undergoing urgent coronary angiography. Platelet reactivity was measured 12-36 hours after 600 mg clopidogrel loading with multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate® analyzer, Roche, Basel, Switzerland, 6.4 µM ADP). HPR was defined by the consensus cut-off area under the curve >46 U. The rate of HPR was 16.0%. We analyzed simple clinical and laboratory parameters with backward multivariate logistic regression and identified the following predictors of HPR: platelet count (per G/L, OR: 1.0073, 95% CI: 1.0035-1.0112, p = 0.0002), CRP level (per mg/L, OR: 1.0077, 95% CI: 1.0016-1.01372, p = 0.01), and active smoking (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, p = 0.02). We developed and internally validated a risk prediction model demonstrating moderate discriminative capacity (area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.67). In conclusion, we found a relatively low rate of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (16.0%) even in an acute patient cohort. HPR measured by Multiplate was associated with high platelet count and CRP level on admission and was inversely related to active smoking. The model with rapidly available simple parameters might help to identify individuals at risk for HPR in the acute setting.

Surgical Revascularization versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Optimal Medical Therapy in Diabetic Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with DM and CAD undergoing revascularization with either a surgical or a percutaneous approach are at higher risk of adverse outcomes and mortality compared with non-DM patients. It is within this background that the optimal choice of revascularization is of critical importance in this high-risk population. The large FREEDOM trial randomized 1900 patients with DM and multivessel CAD to either revascularization with coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Compared with PCI, CABG significantly reduced the rates of death and myocardial infarction but was associated with a higher risk of stroke. In a real-world setting the decision-making process for the optimal revascularization strategy in these patients is challenging as many clinical factors may influence the decision to either pursue a surgical or a percutaneous revascularization. However, the current consensus is that CABG should be the preferred revascularization strategy in diabetic patients with extensive multivessel CAD.

Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study

AIMS

ILUMIEN I is the largest prospective, non-randomized, observational study of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedural practice in patients undergoing intra-procedural pre- and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We report on the impact of OCT on physician decision-making and the association with post-PCI FFR values and early clinical events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Optical coherence tomography and documentary FFR were performed pre- and post-PCI in 418 patients (with 467 stenoses) with stable or unstable angina or NSTEMI. Based on pre-PCI OCT, the procedure was altered in 55% of patients (57% of all stenoses) by selecting different stent lengths (shorter in 25%, longer in 43%). After clinically satisfactory stent implantation using angiographic guidance, post-PCI FFR and OCT were repeated. Optical coherence tomography abnormalities deemed unsatisfactory by the implanting physician were identified: 14.5% malapposition, 7.6% under-expansion, 2.7% edge dissection and prompted further stent optimization based on OCT in 25% of patients (27% of all stenoses) using additional in-stent post-dilatation (81%, 101/124) or placement of 20 new stents (12%). Optimization subgroups were identified post hoc: stent placement without reaction to OCT findings (n = 137), change in PCI planning by pre-PCI OCT (n = 165), post-PCI optimization based on post-PCI OCT (n = 41), change in PCI planning, and post-PCI optimization based on OCT (n = 65). Post-PCI FFR values were significantly different (P = 0.003) between optimization groups (lower in cases with pre- and post-PCI reaction to OCT) but no longer different after post-PCI stent optimization. MACE events at 30 days were low: death 0.25%, MI 7.7%, repeat PCI 1.7%, and stent thrombosis 0.25%.

CONCLUSION

Physician decision-making was affected by OCT imaging prior to PCI in 57% and post-PCI in 27% of all cases. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01663896, Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ILUMIEN I).

Clinical potential of vorapaxar in cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with atherosclerosis

Vorapaxar (ZONTIVITY™, formerly known as SCH 530348) is a specific, orally active antagonist of the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) on platelets. It inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation by binding to the ectodomain of PAR-1. After animal studies and Phase II studies showed that vorapaxar sufficiently inhibits platelet activation without significantly increasing bleeding complications, safety and efficacy of vorapaxar were assessed in two large multicenter trials in patients with coronary artery disease and atherosclerosis. The Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRACER) trial investigated safety and efficacy of vorapaxar in patients with an acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. The Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 50 (TRA 2°P-TIMI 50) investigated atherothrombotic events in patients with stable atherosclerosis. Results of both studies suggested that vorapaxar given in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy can reduce atherothrombotic events, but increases the risk of mild and moderate bleeding complications. This review article summarizes the main results of TRACER and TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 and suggests patient cohorts that might benefit from treatment with vorapaxar in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy.

Coming safely to a stop: a review of platelet activity after cessation of antiplatelet drugs

The platelet P2Y12 antagonists are widely used, usually in combination with aspirin, to prevent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes during percutaneous coronary intervention and after placement of arterial stents. Inhibition by clopidogrel or prasugrel lasts for the lifetime of the affected platelets and platelet haemostatic function gradually recovers after stopping the drug, as new unaffected platelets are formed. The optimal durations for dual antiplatelet therapy are prescribed by clinical guidelines. Continuation beyond the recommended duration is associated with an increased mortality, mainly associated with major bleeding. Fear of a 'rebound' of prothrombotic platelet activity on stopping the drug has provoked much discussion and many studies. However, review of the available literature reveals no evidence for production of hyper-reactive platelets after cessation of clopidogrel in patients who are stable. Any increase in acute coronary and other vascular events after stopping seems most likely therefore to be due to premature discontinuation or disruption of treatment while thrombotic risk is still high. No difference in rebound was found with the newer P2Y12 inhibitors, although ticagrelor and prasugrel are more potent platelet inhibitors than clopidogrel. Recent randomized controlled trials confirm it is safe to stop the thienopyridine and continue with aspirin alone in most patients after the duration of treatment recommended by the guidelines. Decisions on when to stop therapy in individuals, however, remain challenging and there is a growing rationale for platelet testing to assist clinical judgement in certain situations such as patients stopping dual antiplatelet therapy before surgery or in individuals at highest bleeding or thrombotic risk.

Practical experience with ticagrelor: an Australian and New Zealand perspective

OBJECTIVE

Ticagrelor is recommended in local and international guidelines as first-line therapy in combination with aspirin in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance regarding the use of ticagrelor in this setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ticagrelor, a direct-acting, reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist, has a faster onset, and a more potent and predictable antiplatelet effect compared with clopidogrel. The authors recommend considering the use of ticagrelor in moderate-to-high risk ACS patients treated with an invasive approach and those managed non-invasively who have elevated troponin levels. Consistent with outcomes observed in the PLATO trial overall, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease, a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, the elderly, and patients requiring surgical revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

When switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor, patients established on clopidogrel therapy can be switched directly without loading; patients not loaded with clopidogrel and not taking maintenance dose clopidogrel for at least 5 days should first be loaded with ticagrelor. Guidelines recommend discontinuing ticagrelor 5 days before surgery if antiplatelet effects are not desired and recommencing therapy as soon as safe following surgery. Ticagrelor should be avoided in individuals with a history of intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment, high bleeding risk, within 24 hours of thrombolytic therapy, and in those treated with oral anticoagulants. Local, real-world experience suggests low bleeding rates with ticagrelor therapy. Dyspnoea is a common symptom in patients with ACS and is also a side-effect of ticagrelor therapy. Discontinuation of ticagrelor due to dyspnoea has been uncommon in clinical trials. However, local registry data suggest higher discontinuation rates (2-9%) related to dyspnoea in the real-world setting, indicating that clinicians may need to consider other potential causes of dyspnoea before discontinuing ticagrelor.

Comparison of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel to Prevent Periprocedural Myonecrosis in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Guidelines recommend a ticagrelor loading dose (LD) before PCI or a prasugrel LD at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in intermediate and high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, achieving an optimal PR inhibition at the time of PCI is critical to prevent adverse events and depends on the timing of LD intake in relation to PCI. We aimed to compare the rate of myonecrosis related to PCI in patients with NSTE-ACS receiving ticagrelor pretreatment versus prasugrel at the time of intervention. We prospectively randomized 213 patients with NSTE-ACS to a 180 mg of ticagrelor LD given as soon as possible after admission and before PCI or to a 60 mg LD of prasugrel given at the time of PCI. The primary end point was the rate of periprocedural myonecrosis as defined by an increase of >5 times the ninety-ninth percentiles in troponin-negative patients or a 20% increase in troponin-positive patients. The 2 groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics including clinical setting (p = 0.2). Procedural characteristics were also identical including the number of treated vessels and stenting procedures. Patients in the prasugrel group more often required emergent PCI (p = 0.001). Patients in the ticagrelor group had less periprocedural myonecrosis compared with those in the prasugrel group (19.8% vs 38.3%; p = 0.03). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥2 at 1-month follow-up was low and similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, a ticagrelor LD as soon as possible before PCI is superior to prasugrel at the time of PCI to prevent periprocedural myonecrosis in NSTE-ACS.

Complex Disease, Partial Revascularization, and Adverse Outcomes in Patients Treated With Long-Term Warfarin Therapy Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Patients treated with warfarin who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) present a difficult therapeutic problem. Their baseline demographics, procedural characteristics, and 12-month outcomes are poorly defined. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PCI at a major UK Cardiac Center from 2012 to 2013. Of the 2,675 patients who underwent PCI, 155 were on long-term warfarin treatment (5.8%). Patients on warfarin were older and more likely to have significant co-morbidity than those not on warfarin. The modified Mehran bleed score was higher in patients treated with warfarin versus those not treated (19.0 ± 5.8 vs 15.4 ± 8.0, p = 0.004). Baseline SYNTAX scores were higher in the patients treated with warfarin (18.5 ± 9.1 vs 12.4 ± 3.8, p = 0.0006) as were residual SYNTAX scores (8.3 ± 1.1 vs 3.8 ± 5.9, p = 0.001). Bare metal stents were more frequently used in warfarin-treated patients than those not treated (44.8% vs 26.3%, p <0.0001). Antiplatelet monotherapy was prescribed after PCI in 14.4% of patients treated with warfarin and 0.7% of non-warfarin (p <0.0001), whereas average dual anti-platelet therapy duration was also significantly shorter (4.3 vs 10.7 months, p <0.0001). At 1-year follow-up, target-vessel revascularization (6.5% vs 3.3%, p <0.05), stent thrombosis (5.0% vs 2.6%, p = 0.14), death (10.1% vs 4.6%, p <0.01), and target-vessel revascularization/stent thrombosis/death (21.6% vs 10.5%, p = 0.004) were all more common in the warfarin cohort. In conclusion, patients treated with warfarin who need PCI are a complex cohort, more likely to receive incomplete revascularization, less intense, and shorter durations of antiplatelet therapy, and have adverse 1-year outcomes. More trials of both current DES and newer DES technologies in warfarin-treated patients are needed.

Stent Fracture After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Background—

Stent fracture (SF) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is reported to be associated with target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis. We aimed to assess the clinical impact of SF at 8 years.

Methods and Results—

Between 2002 and 2005, 972 patients (1795 lesions) underwent sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and follow-up angiography within 1 year after index procedure. SF, defined as the complete separation of stent segments or stent struts at follow-up angiography, was observed in 105 lesions (5.8%). The study sample comprised 954 patients (1630 lesions), excluding 147 lesions undergoing TLR and 18 patients (18 lesions) who died or in whom stent thrombosis developed within 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. The median follow-up duration was 9.1 years (the first and third quarters, 8.7 and 9.4 years). The primary end point was defined as any TLR. The 8-year cumulative rates of adverse events were estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods with P values from log-rank tests. Between patients with and without SF, there were no significant differences in the cumulative rates of all-cause death (23.5% versus 27.6%, P =0.35) and cardiac death (4.7% versus 9.1%, P =0.14), whereas patients with SF had significantly higher cumulative rates in myocardial infarction (10.1% versus 3.3%, P =0.001), very late stent thrombosis (6.8% versus 0.7%, P <0.001), any TLR (38.1% versus 10.8%, P <0.001), and clinically driven TLR (26.2% versus 6.6%, P <0.001).

Conclusions—

SF after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was consistently associated with higher rates of adverse cardiac events during the 8-year follow-up.

Ticagrelor, prasugrel, or clopidogrel in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: which one to choose?

INTRODUCTION

Clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor are the currently available oral P2Y12 inhibitors for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in association with aspirin. These agents bind the P2Y12 platelet receptor and thus inhibit platelet aggregation. Large randomized clinical trials have provided efficacy and safety data on P2Y12 inhibitors in STEMI patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on key pharmacologic and clinical aspects of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, highlighting their differences. Results from the main clinical trials are discussed, as well as the current STEMI guideline recommendations, to help inform agent selection for patients presenting with STEMI.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials studying newer P2Y12 inhibitors with increased potency have shown further reduction of cardiovascular events compared with clopidogrel, therefore suggesting the use of ticagrelor or prasugrel as a first-line agent for STEMI treatment. There are still clinical situations - such as fibrinolysis, high risk of bleeding, use of oral anticoagulant, and financial hurdles - in which clopidogrel maintains a role in the treatment of STEMI.

Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve

BACKGROUND

Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become a standard diagnostic tool in the catheterization laboratory. FFR evaluation studies were based on pressure recordings during steady-state maximum hyperemia. Commercially available computer systems detect the lowest Pd/Pa ratio automatically, which might not always be measured during steady-state hyperemia. We sought to compare the automatically detected FFR and true steady-state FFR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pressure measurement traces of 105 coronary lesions from 77 patients with intermediate coronary lesions or multivessel disease were reviewed. In all patients, hyperemia had been achieved by intravenous adenosine administration using a dosage of 140 µg/kg/min. In 42 lesions (40%) automatically detected FFR was lower than true steady-state FFR. Mean bias was 0.009 (standard deviation 0.015, limits of agreement -0.02, 0.037). In 4 lesions (3.8%) both methods lead to different treatment recommendations, in all 4 cases instantaneous wave-free ratio confirmed steady-state FFR.

CONCLUSIONS

Automatically detected FFR was slightly lower than steady-state FFR in more than one-third of cases. Consequently, interpretation of automatically detected FFR values closely below the cutoff value requires special attention.

Management of adjunctive antithrombotic therapy in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolysis undergoing rescue or delayed PCI

Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended method of reperfusion in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), fibrinolysis remains a beneficial alternative in patients who cannot be reperfused timely with primary PCI, and is still the preferred revascularisation strategy in many parts of the world where PCI facilities are unavailable. Because fibrinolysis is known to activate platelets and promote thrombin activity, concomitant administration of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies is needed to lower the risk for re-occlusion and to support mechanical interventions in patients undergoing rescue or delayed PCI. However, the addition of oral antiplatelet and parenteral anticoagulant drugs on top of fibrinolysis may come at the price of an increased risk of bleeding. The current availability of several antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies often leads to questions about the optimal selection in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytics. This article appraises current evidences for the management of adjunctive antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies in patients with STEMI undergoing fibrinolysis followed by rescue or delayed PCI.

Everolimus-eluting stent platforms in percutaneous coronary intervention: comparative effectiveness and outcomes

Despite the remarkable benefits obtained following the introduction of the first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES), concerns were raised over its long-term safety, particularly with regard to very late (beyond 1 year) stent thrombosis. Newer-generation DESs have been developed to overcome this limitation using novel stent platforms, new drugs, more biocompatible durable polymers, and bioabsorbable polymers or backbones. To date, new-generation DESs have virtually replaced the use of first-generation DESs worldwide. In this review article, we discuss in detail the design, pharmacology, and mechanism of action of the newer-generation permanent and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting platforms. Furthermore, we present and evaluate the current evidence on the performance and safety of these devices compared to those of other available stent platforms.

Antiplatelet Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Context:

Coronary artery disease is highly prevalent among patients with end stage renal disease/hemodialysis (ESRD/HD) and coronary percutaneous interventions (PCI) has been increased by nearly 50% over the past decade. After PCI with stent placement, guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), but no specifically tailored pharmacotherapy approach is outlined for this frail population, mostly excluded from large randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Evidence Acquisition:

We reviewed current evidences on the use of antiplatelet therapy in patients with ESRD/HD undergoing PCI, focusing on the efficacy and safety of specific agents and their indications for detailed clinical settings.

Results:

Clinical setting in HD patients is the principal determinant of the type, onset, combination and duration of the DAPT. However, irrespective clinical setting, in addition to aspirin, clopidogrel is currently the most used antiplatelet agent even if no information derived from RCTs are available in ESRD. Due to the large experience acquired in routine clinical practice, the awareness of safety is higher for clopidogrel than newer antiplatelet agents. Because of lack of data, the use of prasugrel and ticagrelor is actually not recommended. However, in case of high ischemic and acceptable bleeding risk, they may be selectively used in ESRD/HD.

Conclusions:

This investigation might contribute to delineate the best treatment options for this high risk population.

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Shorter (Less or Equal Than 6 Months) and Longer (More or Equal Than 12 Months) Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy Following Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents

CONTEXT

The optimal duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) after the implantation of drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) is still the subject of ongoing debate. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the optimal duration between ≤ 6 months and ≥ 12 months for DAPT after implantation of DES.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This study was conducted at the department of cardiology, the first college of clinical medical sciences, institute of cardiovascular diseases of Three Gorges university during December 2014. Pub-med, Cochrane, Scopus and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for papers published until December 2014. Searches of the above databases included terms "dual anti-platelet therapy" and "myocardial infarction (MI)" and "drug-eluting stents (DES)". All the searched literatures were limited to Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Quality assessments were evaluated with the Jadad quality scale. Data were extracted by two independent observers (FZ and YC). For all analyses, the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated and heterogeneity of the studies was analyzed using I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 9979 participants satisfying the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed. Overall, there were 4993 patients with shorter duration of DAPT and 4986 patients with a longer treatment. Clopidogrel was the used P2Y12 receptor inhibitor in all five RCTs. On one hand compared to shorter duration (≤ 12 months) DAPT, longer duration (≥ 12 months) did not reduce risk of mortality, cardiac death, cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis (pooled OR 1.03, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.80 - 1.32, P = 0.85, I(2) = 0%; pooled OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.64 - 1.29, P = 0.60, I(2) = 0%; pooled OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.50 - 1.42, P = 0.51, I(2) = 0%; pooled OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.87 - 1.58, P = 0.29, I(2) = 0%; pooled OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.81 - 2.29, P = 0.24, I(2) = 0%). On the other hand, longer duration (≥ 12 months) could also increase the risk of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding (pooled OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29 - 0.85, P = 0.01, I(2) = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the efficacy outcomes of the patients after DES implantation, no differences were found between shorter (≤ 6 months) and longer (≥ 12 months) duration of DAPT. What is worse is that longer duration (≥ 12 months) was associated with increased risk of bleeding complications.

Longer- Versus Shorter-Duration Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The appropriate duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement remains controversial.

PURPOSE

To summarize data on clinical outcomes with longer- versus shorter-duration DAPT after DES placement in adults with coronary artery disease.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE, 1996 to 27 March 2015, and manual screening of references.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials comparing longer- versus shorter-duration DAPT after DES placement.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers screened potentially eligible articles; extracted data on populations, interventions, and outcomes; assessed risk of bias; and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines to rate overall confidence in effect estimates.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among 1010 articles identified, 9 trials including 29,531 patients were eligible; data were complete for 28,808 patients. Moderate-quality evidence showed that longer-duration DAPT decreased risk for myocardial infarction (risk ratio [RR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.92]) and increased mortality (RR, 1.19 [CI, 1.04 to 1.36]). High-quality evidence showed that DAPT increased risk for major bleeding (RR, 1.63 [CI, 1.34 to 1.99]).

LIMITATION

Confidence in estimates were decreased owing to imprecision for most outcomes (particularly myocardial infarction), risk of bias from limited blinding in 7 of 9 studies, indirectness due to variability in use of first- and second-generation stents, and off-protocol use of DAPT in some studies.

CONCLUSION

Extended DAPT is associated with approximately 8 fewer myocardial infarctions per 1000 treated patients per year but 6 more major bleeding events than shorter-duration DAPT. Because absolute effects are very small and closely balanced, decisions regarding the duration of DAPT therapy must take into account patients' values and preference.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Treatment in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Comparison of the Updated North American and European Guidelines

In 2014, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) published their guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), whereas the European Society of Cardiology published their latest guideline for the management of patients with NSTE-ACS in 2011. In this article, we review the main updates in antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy in the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline and compare them with the 2011 European guidelines. Key recommendations in the AHA/ACC guidelines include the addition of ticagrelor to a broad spectrum of patients with NSTE-ACS, narrowing of the role of prasugrel to patients who undergo coronary stenting, and limiting the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors mainly to high-risk patients during percutaneous coronary intervention. These modifications bring the North American and the European guidelines closer together. The recommendations regarding anticoagulants still differ between the 2 guidelines, although all 4 parenteral agents (unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux) are now considered acceptable by both guidelines. We also review new data from clinical trials that became available after the 2014 guidelines were finalized, including studies with cangrelor, rivaroxaban, vorapaxar, ticagrelor, and long-term use of dual antiplatelets that will be considered in future guidelines. As the 2014 guidelines represent the most comprehensive and authoritative document for the management of patients with NSTE-ACS, clinicians who manage these patients should be familiar with their recommendations to ensure optimal patient care.

Oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current status, special situations, and unmet needs

In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists reduces the risk of stroke by more than 60%. But vitamin K antagonists have limitations, including causing serious bleeding such as intracranial haemorrhage and the need for anticoagulation monitoring. In part related to these limitations, they are used in only about half of patients who should be treated according to guideline recommendations. In the past decade, oral agents have been developed that directly block the activity of thrombin (factor IIa), as well as drugs that directly inhibit activated factor X (Xa), which is the first protein in the final common pathway to the activation of thrombin. These novel non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown to be at least as good as warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and they have proved to have better safety profiles. Their net advantage is underscored by significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with warfarin in large clinical trials. Because of these features and their ease of use, they are recommended for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. They have also a fast onset and offset of action, but they currently lack specific antidotes. This paper addresses the role of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in the era of NOACs, with a focus on special situations including management in the event of bleeding and around the time of procedures including cardioversion, catheter ablation, and device implantation. Also their use in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease, with advanced age, with chronic kidney disease, or with valvular heart disease will be discussed as well as the interaction of NOACs with other cardiac medication, and switching between anticoagulants.

Early occlusion of the non-infarct-related coronary artery following successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

We present a clinical case of early occlusion of the non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA) in a patient with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Several hours after successful percutaneous treatment of the occluded right coronary artery the patient developed a second myocardial infarction, which was caused by acute occlusion of the left anterior descending artery, which had a significant lesion in the proximal segment. The lesion was diagnosed during the first catheterization, but was left untreated. We discuss the potential advantages and risks associated with the ad-hoc multivessel PCI strategy in STEMI.

Update on percutaneous intervention for left main coronary artery stenosis

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) is currently considered as a viable alternative to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for selected patients with left main coronary artery disease. The updated results of the landmark randomized trials comparing CABG versus PCI demonstrated comparable 5-year outcomes and are in line with the current guidelines that designate PCI as a reasonable treatment in this disease subset. Given that the completed randomized trials did not include contemporary DESs, the upcoming results of the ongoing trials evaluating the performance of new-generation DES compared with CABG (such as the EXCEL trial), may further help to clarify the current role and future recommendations of PCI for left main coronary artery disease. Apart from the recent stent technology, further improvements in outcomes after PCI may be possible when it is used with an integrated approach that combines functional concepts for decision-making, adjunctive imaging support and optimal pharmacotherapies.

Update: Acute Heart Failure (VII): Nonpharmacological Management of Acute Heart Failure

Acute heart failure is a major and growing public health problem worldwide with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Despite recent advances in pharmacological management, the prognosis of patients with acute decompensated heart failure remains poor. Consequently, nonpharmacological approaches are being developed and increasingly used. Such techniques may include several modalities of ventilation, ultrafiltration, mechanical circulatory support, myocardial revascularization, and surgical treatment, among others. This document reviews the nonpharmacological approach in acute heart failure, indications, and prognostic implications.

Modifying angiographic syntax score according to PCI strategy: lessons learnt from ERACI IV Study

In recent years an angiographic score was introduced in clinical practice to stratified different levels of risk after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with drug eluting stents. The SYNTAX score (SS) classified patients in three different risk levels and was included in revascularization guidelines that patients allocated with low SS could be equally treated with either PCI or CABG, whereas those with intermediate or high SS were better off with CABG. However, using original SS each coronary lesion with a diameter stenosis ≥50% in vessels ≥1.5 mm was scored. In ERACI IV registry we used a revascularization strategy during PCI where operators were advised to only treat lesions≥than 70% in a≥2.0 mm reference vessel; therefore, no intermediate lesions should be treated, and severe stenosis in vessels<2.0 mm was discouraged as well. If we recalculated SS using the above-mentioned operators' advices all intermediate lesions were not scored, and severe stenosis in vessels<2.0 mm were excluded for the analysis, including bifurcations, trifurcations and chronic total occlusions; after this new scoring, the original SS dropped significantly which is in accordance with the goal of complete functional revascularization strategy of the ERACI IV study and the low one year adverse events of such study. In conclusion, if we performed an SS scoring, only severe stenosis in vessels with a reference diameter ≥2.0 mm would allow a more rational assessment of coronary anatomy, and the use of a more conservative PCI strategy.

Duration of Triple Therapy in Patients Requiring Oral Anticoagulation After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ISAR-TRIPLE Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving oral anticoagulation (OAC) who undergo drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation require additional dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Such triple therapy confers an elevated bleeding risk, and its optimal duration is not known.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate whether shortening the duration of clopidogrel therapy from 6 months to 6 weeks after DES implantation was associated with a superior net clinical outcome in patients receiving concomitant aspirin and OAC.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label trial, we enrolled patients receiving OAC who underwent DES implantation at 3 European centers between September 2008 and December 2013. A total of 614 patients receiving concomitant aspirin and OAC were randomized to either 6-week clopidogrel therapy (n=307) or 6-month clopidogrel therapy (n=307). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding at 9 months.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint occurred in 30 patients (9.8%) in the 6-week group compared with 27 patients (8.8%) in the 6-month group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.91; p=0.63). There were no significant differences for the secondary combined ischemic endpoint of cardiac death, MI, definite stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke (12 [4.0%] vs. 13 [4.3%]; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.05; p=0.87) or the secondary bleeding endpoint of TIMI major bleeding (16 [5.3%] vs. 12 [4.0%]; HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 0.64 to 2.84; p=0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Six weeks of triple therapy was not superior to 6 months with respect to net clinical outcomes. These results suggest that physicians should weigh the trade-off between ischemic and bleeding risk when choosing the shorter or longer duration of triple therapy. (Triple Therapy in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation After Drug Eluting Stent Implantation [ISAR-TRIPLE]; NCT00776633).

[Antithrombotic treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Which drugs and for how long?]

Stable chronic coronary artery disease (SCAD) encompasses several groups of patients including those with stable angina pectoris or other symptoms thought to be linked to CAD as well as patients with known prior acute coronary syndrome or prior coronary interventions, who have become asymptomatic with treatment and need regular follow-up. Patients with SCAD have an elevated risk for subsequent ischemic events and significantly benefit not only from lipid-lowering therapy with statins but also in particular from long-term antithrombotic treatment. These patients therefore need lifelong antithrombotic treatment with 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) daily whereby clopidogrel 75 mg daily is indicated as an alternative in cases of aspirin intolerance. As chronic CAD may present with very different developmental phases spanning from chronic stable phases to acute coronary syndromes, antithrombotic treatment in SCAD patients needs continuous evaluation and adaptation. In addition, new concomitant diseases, such as atrial fibrillation may necessitate further adaptation of antithrombotic therapy. The current overview focuses on the description of the long-term antithrombotic treatment of SCAD as well as on the need for adaptation in the setting of elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Left main reconstruction as an alternative method to CABG after primary PCI complication

Left main coronary artery disease is rare, accounting for 1% of all coronary artery disease and traditionally, is treated by coronary artery bypass grafting. We report our experience and five years follow up, after a coronary osteal surgical plasty in a young man who referred to our center with an anterior myocardial infarction.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly

Our population dynamics are changing. The number of octogenarians and older people in the general population is increasing and therefore the number of older patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome or stable angina is increasing. This group has a larger burden of coronary disease and also a greater number of concomitant comorbidities when compared to younger patients. Many of the studies assessing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to date have actively excluded octogenarians. However, a number of studies, both retrospective and prospective, are now being undertaken to reflect the, "real" population. Despite being a higher risk group for both elective and emergency PCIs, octogenarians have the greatest to gain in terms of prognosis, symptomatic relief, and arguably more importantly, quality of life. Important future development will include assessment of patient frailty, encouraging early presentation, addressing gender differences on treatment strategies, identification of culprit lesion(s) and vascular access to minimise vascular complications. We are now appreciating that the new frontier is perhaps recognising and risk stratifying those elderly patients who have the most to gain from PCI. This review article summarises the most relevant trials and studies.

Impact of Dabigatran versus Phenprocoumon on ADP Induced Platelet Aggregation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with or without Concomitant Clopidogrel Therapy (the Dabi-ADP-1 and Dabi-ADP-2 Trials)

Background. A relevant number of patients receive triple therapy with clopidogrel, aspirin, and oral anticoagulation. Clopidogrel's efficacy on ADP induced platelet function may be influenced by concomitant antithrombotic therapies. Data regarding the effect of dabigatran on platelet function is limited to in vitro studies and healthy individuals. Methods. The “Dabi-ADP-1” and “Dabi-ADP-2” trials randomized patients with atrial fibrillation to either dabigatran or phenprocoumon for a 2-week period. In Dabi-ADP-1 (n = 70) patients with clopidogrel therapy were excluded and in Dabi-ADP-2 (n = 46) patients had to be treated concomitantly with clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was ADP-induced platelet aggregation between dabigatran and phenprocoumon at 14 days. Secondary endpoints were ADPtest HS-, TRAP-, and COL-induced platelet aggregation. Results. There was no significant difference regarding the primary endpoint between both groups in either trial (Dabi-ADP-1: Dabigatran: 846 [650–983] AU × min versus phenprocoumon: 839 [666–1039] AU × min, P = 0.90 and Dabi-ADP-2: 326 [268–462] versus 350 [214–535], P = 0.70) or regarding the secondary endpoints, ADPtest HS-, TRAP-, and COL-induced platelet aggregation. Conclusion. Dabigatran as compared to phenprocoumon has no impact on ADP-induced platelet aggregation in atrial fibrillation patients neither with nor without concomitant clopidogrel therapy.

Clinical development of rivaroxaban: emerging new clinical evidences?

Rivaroxaban has proven efficacious in a variety of conditions. In fact, rivaroxaban has been approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee replacement surgery, for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and for the prevention of atherothrombotic events after acute coronary syndrome with elevated cardiac biomarkers. However, clinical development of rivaroxaban is ongoing. Considering published and on-going randomized clinical trials, noninterventional studies and registries, over 275,000 patients are being analyzed. The aim of this review was to update the clinical development of rivaroxaban, including completed and ongoing studies not only randomized clinical trials, but also clinical practice studies.

Antiplatelet Therapy During PCI for Patients with Stable Angina and Atrial Fibrillation

The pharmacological treatment options for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib) have increased with the introduction of novel oral anticoagulants, compared with earlier times, when vitamin K antagonist was the drug of choice. As they age, many Afib patients require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), necessitating antiplatelet medication in addition to anticoagulation therapy. Choosing the appropriate combination and duration of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies may be challenging in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and even more complicated during and after coronary intervention with the introduction of additional antithrombotic drugs. In this article, we review the scientific basis for the recent guidelines for anticoagulation and antithrombotic therapy in patients with Afib and stable CAD before, during, and after elective PCI.