Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest

A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes

In budding yeast, meiotic recombination occurs at about 200 sites per cell and involves DNA double-strand break (DSB) intermediates. Here we provide evidence that a checkpoint control requiring the mitotic DNA-damage checkpoint genes RAD17, RAD24 and MEC1 ensures that meiotic recombination is complete before the first meiotic division (MI). First, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC1 are required for the meiotic arrest caused by blocking the repair of DSBs with a mutation in the recA homologue DMC1. Second, mec1 and rad24 single mutants (DMC1+) appear to undergo MI before all recombination events are complete. Curiously, the mitosis-specific checkpoint gene RAD9 is not required for meiotic arrest of dmc1 mutants. This shows that although mitotic and meiotic control mechanisms are related, they differ significantly. Rad17 and Rad24 proteins may contribute directly to formation of an arrest signal by association with single-strand DNA in mitosis and meiosis.

RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, yeast cells arrest at distinct points in the cell cycle and induce the transcription of genes whose products facilitate DNA repair. Examination of the inducibility of RNR3 in response to UV damage has revealed that the various checkpoint genes can be arranged in a pathway consistent with their requirement to arrest cells at different stages of the cell cycle. While RAD9, RAD24, and MEC3 are required to activate the DNA damage checkpoint when cells are in G1 or G2, POL2 is required to sense UV damage and replication blocks when cells are in S phase. The phosphorylation of the essential central transducer, Rad53p, is dependent on POL2 and RAD9 in response to UV damage, indicating that RAD53 functions downstream of both these genes. Mutants defective for both pathways are severely deficient in Rad53p phosphorylation and RNR3 induction and are significantly more sensitive to DNA damage and replication blocks than single mutants alone. These results show that POL2 and RAD9 function in parallel branches for sensing and transducing the UV DNA damage signal. Each of these pathways subsequently activates the central transducers Mec1p/Esr1p/Sad3p and Rad53p/Mec2p/Sad1p, which are required for both cell-cycle arrest and transcriptional responses.

Cdc13p: a single-strand telomeric DNA-binding protein with a dual role in yeast telomere maintenance

The CDC13 gene has previously been implicated in the maintenance of telomere integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. With the use of two classes of mutations, here it is shown that CDC13 has two discrete roles at the telomere. The cdc13-2est mutation perturbs a function required in vivo for telomerase regulation but not in vitro for enzyme activity, whereas cdc13-1ts defines a separate essential role at the telomere. In vitro, purified Cdc13p binds to single-strand yeast telomeric DNA. Therefore, Cdc13p is a telomere-binding protein required to protect the telomere and mediate access of telomerase to the chromosomal terminus.

The 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A is required for the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints in budding yeast

The rfa1-M2 and rfa1-M4 Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants, which are altered in the 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA) and sensitive to UV and methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), have been analyzed for possible checkpoint defects. The G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints are defective in the rfa1-M2 mutant, since rfa1-M2 cells fail to properly delay cell cycle progression in response to UV irradiation in G1 and MMS treatment during S phase. Conversely, the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint and the S/M checkpoint are proficient in rfa1-M2 cells and all the checkpoints tested are functional in the rfa1-M4 mutant. Preventing S phase entry by alpha-factor treatment after UV irradiation in G1 does not change rfa1-M4 cell lethality, while it allows partial recovery of rfa1-M2 cell viability. Therefore, the hypersensitivity to UV and MMS treatments observed in the rfa1-M4 mutant might only be due to impairment of RPA function in DNA repair, while the rfa1-M2 mutation seems to affect both the DNA repair and checkpoint functions of Rpa70.

Cell cycle, DNA damage and heat shock regulate suc22+ expression in fission yeast

The suc22+ gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe encodes the small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase. Two transcripts that hybridise to suc22+ have previously been described: a constitutive transcript of 1.5 kb, and a transcript of approximately 1.9 kb that is induced when DNA replication is blocked by hydroxyurea. In this paper we show that both transcripts derive from the suc22+ gene, are polyadenylated, and have transcription initiation sites separated by approximately 550 nucleotides. The absence of translation initiation codons and predicted intron splice sites within this 550 nucleotide region suggests strongly that both transcripts encode the same protein. Under normal growth conditions, the larger suc22+ transcript is present at a very low level. This low level expression is periodic during the cell cycle, showing a pattern similar to that of other genes under regulation by MCB elements with a maximum in G1/S phase. Consistent with this, there are MCB elements upstream of the initiation site of the transcript. This pattern of expression contrasts with the continuous expression, at a much higher level, of the smaller suc22+ transcript. The larger suc22+ transcript is induced by exposure of cells to 4-nitroquinoline oxide (4-NQO),a UV-mimetic agent that causes DNA damage. The transcriptional response to 4-NQO is observed in cells previously arrested in G2 by a cdc2ts mutation, demonstrating that induction can occur outside S phase. We show that the rad1+ gene, part of the mitotic checkpoint, is required for induction of the large transcript. Exposure of cells to heat shock also induces the suc22+ large transcript: a consensus heat shock element has been identified upstream of the large transcript start site.

Ataxia-telangiectasia and the ATM gene: linking neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency, and cancer to cell cycle checkpoints

Defects in regulation of the cellular life cycle may lead to premature cellular death or malignant transformation. Most of the proteins known to be involved in these processes are mediators of mitogenic signals or components of the cell cycle machinery. It has recently become evident, however, that systems responsible for ensuring genome stability and integrity are no less important in maintaining the normal life cycle of the cell. These systems include DNA repair enzymes and a recently emerging group of proteins that alert growth regulating mechanisms to the presence of DNA damage. These signals slow down the cell cycle while DNA repair ensues. Ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) is a genetic disorder whose clinical and cellular phenotype points to a defect in such a signaling system. A-T is characterized by neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity, cancer predisposition, and defective cell cycle checkpoints. The responsible gene, ATM, was recently cloned and sequenced. ATM encodes a large protein with a region highly similar to the catalytic domain of PI 3-kinases. The ATM protein is similar to a group of proteins in various organisms which are directly involved in the cell cycle response to DNA damage. It is expected to be part of a protein complex that responds to a specific type of DNA strand break by conveying a regulatory signal to other proteins. Interestingly, the immune and nervous systems, which differ markedly in their proliferation rates, are particularly sensitive to the absence of ATM function. The identification of the ATM gene highlights the growing importance of signal transduction initiated in the nucleus rather than in the external environment, for normal cellular growth.

Abnormal kinetochore structure activates the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast

Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells containing one or more abnormal kinetochores delay anaphase entry. The delay can be produced by using centromere DNA mutations present in single-copy or kinetochore protein mutations. This observation is strikingly similar to the preanaphase delay or arrest exhibited in animal cells that experience spontaneous or induced failures in bipolar attachment of one or more chromosomes and may reveal the existence of a conserved surveillance pathway that monitors the state of chromosome attachment to the spindle before anaphase. We find that three genes (MAD2, BUB1, and BUB2) that are required for the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast (defined by antimicrotubule drug-induced arrest or delay) are also required in the establishment and/or maintenance of kinetochore-induced delays. This was tested in strains in which the delays were generated by limited function of a mutant kinetochore protein (ctf13-30) or by the presence of a single-copy centromere DNA mutation (CDEII delta 31). Whereas the MAD2 and BUB1 genes were absolutely required for delay, loss of BUB2 function resulted in a partial delay defect, and we suggest that BUB2 is required for delay maintenance. The inability of mad2-1 and bub1 delta mutants to execute kinetochore-induced delay is correlated with striking increases in chromosome missegregation, indicating that the delay does indeed have a role in chromosome transmission fidelity. Our results also indicated that the yeast RAD9 gene, necessary for DNA damage-induced arrest, had no role in the kinetochore-induced delays. We conclude that abnormal kinetochore structures induce preanaphase delay by activating the same functions that have defined the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast.

Interindividual variations in susceptibility and sensitivity: linking risk assessment and risk management

In the past few years, our knowledge of mammalian genomes has increased enormously. Our understanding of the molecular basis of the normal cellular processes of DNA replication and repair and cell cycle control, together with how their fidelity malfunctions as part of tumor development, has increased in parallel. This has led to a clearer appreciation that there are subpopulations that have been generically described as being genetically or otherwise susceptible to the induction of cancer or birth defects. The term susceptibility is a default option, since there clearly will be a very broad range of sensitivities among the so-called susceptible populations, dependent upon the specific underlying mechanism. This could lead to the conduct of risk assessments for each specific situation, involving both genotypes of individuals and agents of concern. This would ideally take into account the effects on response of various modifying factors, genetic and other. One advantage to be gained from this approach is the ability to determine if a particular susceptibility places subpopulations at extreme risk as compared to the overall normal distribution of risk in the population, or whether such a susceptible population presents a slight extension of the upper bound of the risk distribution or lies within the normal distribution. In addition, the specific mechanism of the susceptibility as related to exposure scenarios and the magnitude and demographics of the susceptible populations need to be taken into account. Thus, the management of risk has to be linked to the specific risk assessment. For many of the so-called susceptible populations an uncertainty factor of less than 10, even including 1, would be predicted to bring the risk within the normal distribution. It is hoped that as more mechanistic information on susceptibility becomes available and a specific risk can be defined, the practice of risk management will be considerably improved.

Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase

The catalytic DNA primase subunit of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex is encoded by the essential PRI1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To identify factors that functionally interact with yeast DNA primase in living cells, we developed a genetic screen for mutants that are lethal at the permissive temperature in a cold-sensitive pril-2 genetic background. Twenty-four recessive mutations belonging to seven complementation groups were identified. Some mutants showed additional phenotypes, such as increased sensitivity to UV irradiation, methyl methanesulfonate, and hydroxyurea, that were suggestive of defects in DNA repair and/or checkpoint mechanisms. We have cloned and characterized the gene of one complementation group, PIP3, whose product is necessary both for delaying entry into S phase or mitosis when cells are UV irradiated in G1 or G2 phase and for lowering the rate of ongoing DNA synthesis in the presence of methyl methanesulfonate. PIP3 turned out to be the MEC3 gene, previously identified as a component of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. The finding that Mec3 is also required for the G1- and S-phase DNA damage checkpoints, together with the analysis of genetic interactions between a mec3 null allele and several conditional DNA replication mutations at the permissive temperature, suggests that Mec3 could be part of a mechanism coupling DNA replication with repair of DNA damage, and DNA primase might be involved in this process.

Effect of B-type cyclin over-expression on radiation-induced mitotic delay in the fission yeast

Exposure to ionizing radiation temporarily blocks eukaryotic cell cycle progression at the G2/M boundary (G2 delay). The delay probably provides time for repair of DNA damage before chromosome segregation and is thus an active response, indicative of a checkpoint control function. Transition from G2 into mitosis is normally controlled by the activity of a cyclin-dependent kinase, cdc2 in the fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe). Genetic and cell kinetic evidence suggest that irradiation may impose mitotic delay by inactivation of the cdc2 product, p34cdc2. The activity of p34cdc2 in G2 is regulated by phosphorylation and association with a B-type cyclin, the product of the cdc13 gene, p56cdc13. Previous work does not support a major role for changes in phosphorylation of p34cdc2 in the induction of mitotic delay. Alternatively the kinase may be regulated by changes in the activity/availability of p56cdc13. We have therefore tested the effect of high level, episomal expression of the cdc13 gene on the induction of mitotic delay. No influence of this procedure on the duration of delay was detected, either in a wild-type cell cycle background, or the mutants wee1-50 and cdc2-3w, which show abnormal phosphorylation of p34cdc2.

Cloning and characterization of RAD17, a gene controlling cell cycle responses to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in the RAD17 gene are sensitive to ultraviolet (UV) and gamma radiation and manifest a defect in G2 arrest following radiation treatment. We have cloned the RAD17 gene by complementation of the UV sensitivity of a rad17-1 mutant and identified an ORF of 1.2 kb encoding a predicted gene product of 45.4 kDa with homology to the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad1+ gene product and to Ustilago maydis Rec1, a known 3'->5'exonuclease. The RAD17 transcript is cell cycle regulated, with maximum steady-state levels during late G1. The rad17-1 mutation represents a missense mutation that maps to a conserved region of the gene. A rad17 disruption mutant grows normally and manifests levels of UV sensitivity similar that of the rad17-1 strain. As previously observed with other genes involved in G2 arrest (such as RAD9 and RAD24), RAD17 regulates radiation-induced G1 checkpoints at at least two possible arrest stages. One is equivalent to or upstream of START, the other at or downstream of the Cdc4 execution point. However, the temperature sensitivity of the cell cycle mutant dna1-1 (a G1 arrest mutant) is not influenced by inactivation of RAD17.

Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function

In eukaryotic cells, checkpoint genes cause arrest of cell division when DNA is damaged or when DNA replication is blocked. In this study of budding yeast checkpoint genes, we identify and characterize another role for these checkpoint genes after DNA damage-transcriptional induction of genes. We found that three checkpoint genes (of six genes tested) have strong and distinct roles in transcriptional induction in four distinct pathways of regulation (each defined by induction of specific genes). MEC1 mediates the response in three transcriptional pathways, RAD53 mediates two of these pathways, and RAD17 mediates but a single pathway. The three other checkpoint genes (including RAD9) have small (twofold) but significant roles in transcriptional induction in all pathways. One of the pathways that we identify here leads to induction of MEC1 and RAD53 checkpoint genes themselves. This suggests a positive feedback circuit that may increase the cell's ability to respond to DNA damage. We make two primary conclusions from these studies. First, MEC1 appears to be the key regulator because it is required for all responses (both transcriptional and cell cycle arrest), while other genes serve only a subset of these responses. Second, the two types of responses, transcriptional induction and cell cycle arrest, appear distinct because both require MEC1 yet only cell cycle arrest requires RAD9. These and other results were used to formulate a working model of checkpoint gene function that accounts for roles of different checkpoint genes in different responses and after different types of damage. The conclusion that the yeast MEC1 gene is a key regulator also has implications for the role of a putative human homologue, the ATM gene.

From DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and suicide: a budding yeast perspective

Eukaryotic checkpoint control genes are important for cell cycle delay, DNA repair and cell suicide after DNA is damaged. Recent studies in budding yeast show how the participation of checkpoint control proteins in DNA metabolism could lead to all three of these outcomes.