Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: standardized technique of a potential stand-alone bariatric procedure in morbidly obese patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to define a standardized technique for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese patient.

METHODS

There are several surgical options for the morbidy obese patient. In general, there are the restrictive procedures [e.g., laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB)] and the malabsorptive procedures [e.g. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP)]. Those techniques are already standardized. The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) seems to have some advantages over both procedures, but it is not standardized yet, and so there can be no comparison between the different techniques. In our center we have standardized the LSG technique with respect to abdominal access and narrowness of the gastric sleeve. After dissection of the greater omentum and the short gastric vessels, the greater curvature is resected along a 34-Fr gastric tube using the Endo-GIA. The remaining gastric sleeve has a volume of about 100 ml.

RESULTS

The standardized LSG procedure is presented step by step. A comparison of operative data and early outcome with a matched group of patients with adjustable gastric banding showed no difference between the two techniques with respect to operating time, surgical complications, and weight loss 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

With our standardized LSG technique it is possible to evaluate the positive aspects of the LSG compared with other standardized bariatric procedures like LAGB or LRYGBP.

Complications after sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an increasingly used bariatric surgical procedure.

METHODS

We report our complications after LSG and compared to 17 other published LSG series. The individual types of complications for the published series were evaluated, with sample size calculations being performed to determine the number of patients required for a study that would detect halving the odds of the most common complications.

RESULTS

Of 53 patients who underwent LSG, 42 were women. Mean age was 51 years with a mean initial body mass index of 53.5 kg/m2 and mean of eight comorbidities. Mean excess weight loss was 52.2% at 12 months and 59.2% at 18 months. No patients died. Five patients (9.4%) developed complications which included two staple line leaks that required reoperations, one preceded by a salmonella infection associated with vomiting, the other by postoperative pneumonia associated with coughing. Of the three staple line hemorrhages, one required hospitalization. The median complication rate for the 17 articles was 4.5%. With the number of patients for each series taken into account, the current series had a complication rate of 1.24 (95% CI 0.45-2.87) times that of the 17 published series. Published LSG complications were diverse, with the most common being reoperation, occurring after 3.6% of procedures. A study designed to detect halving the odds of reoperation would require more than 3,000 procedures.

CONCLUSION

LSG is a safe procedure with low morbidity. Because leaks and reoperation in this series were preceded by large increments in intraabdominal pressure, attention to staple line reinforcements that increase burst pressure may be warranted.

Plasma ghrelin modulation in gastric band operation and sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Gastric band operation and sleeve gastrectomy are increasingly popular bariatric surgeries for weight loss. The purpose of this study is to investigate the changes in plasma ghrelin levels and hypothalamic ghrelin receptor expression with weight loss achieved through these surgeries.

METHODS

Twenty-four high fat diet-induced obese rats were used to investigate the effects of gastric band and sleeve operation on Body Mass Index, fat mass, plasma ghrelin levels, and hypothalamic growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R 1a) protein expression in hypothalamus. In comparison, data of patients who received laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in our hospital in 2005 were also summarized.

RESULTS

Body weights and fat mass decreased significantly in rats that received operation. Plasma ghrelin concentrations in the sleeve group were 0.4-fold of control rats and about 2-fold of control in the gastric band group. GHS-R1a protein expression in hypothalamus was 1.5-fold in the sleeve group compared with control group, while it was only 0.9-fold in the gastric band group. Clinical data showed that patients in the LSG group lost 60% excess body weights in 2 years follow-up. After operation, fasting plasma ghrelin concentrations in LAGB was significantly higher than the LSG group.

CONCLUSION

Both LAGB and LSG can decrease patients' excess body weights and fat mass. Plasma ghrelin levels are down-regulated with LSG operation but up-regulated with LAGB operation. Hypothalamic GHS-R1a expression is elevated in sleeve gastrectomy.

Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy is a new restrictive bariatric procedure increasingly indicated in the treatment of morbid obesity. The authors report their experience of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), evaluate the efficacy of this procedure on weight loss, and analyze the short-term outcome.

METHODS

The data of 135 consecutive patients undergoing LSG between July 2004 and October 2007 were analyzed prospectively. LSG was indicated only for weight reduction with a body mass index (BMI) > 40 or > 35 kg/m(2) associated with severe comorbidity. Study endpoints included mean BMI, comorbidity, operative data, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative complications, major and minor complication rates, excess weight loss, follow-up, and duration of hospital stay. Possible risk factors for postoperative gastric fistula (PGF) were investigated.

RESULTS

This series comprised 113 females and 22 males with a mean age of 40 years (range, 18-65). Mean weight was 132 kg (range, 94-186), and mean preoperative BMI was 48.8 kg/m(2) (range, 37-72). The mean operating time was 103 minutes (range, 30-550). No patients required conversion to laparotomy, and 96% of patients did not require drainage. The nasogastric tube was removed on postoperative day 1. The postoperative course was uneventful in 94.9% of cases, and the median duration of hospital stay was 3.8 days. The median follow-up was 12.7 months. The mean postoperative BMI decreased to 39.8 kg/m(2) at 6 months (P < .001). Average excess body weight loss was 38.6% and 49.4% at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. There was no mortality, and the major complication rate, corresponding to gastric fistula (PGF) in every case, was 5.1% (n = 7). Management of PGF required reoperation, radiologic and endoscopic procedures, and fibrin glue; the median hospital stay was 47 days. BMI > 60 kg/m(2) appears to be a risk factor for PGF.

CONCLUSION

LSG is a reproducible and seems to be an effective treatment to achieve significant weight loss after 12 months follow-up. LSG can be used as a standalone operation to obtain weight reduction. Management of PGF remains a major issue.

Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an accepted bariatric procedure, with an advantaged by a low complication rate. A feared complication is stapler line leak. Buttressing materials have been suggested as a means of reducing staple line leak rates. We analyzed the leak rates from published series to help in demonstrating a potential cause.

METHODS

The study was institutional review board (IRB) approved retrospectively. A Medline search using the key words sleeve gastrectomy and bariatric surgery obtained 54 articles. Attention was restricted to 11 articles written in English that listed numbers of gastrectomy procedures and leaks. Poisson regression assessed the possibility that patients who received buttressing materials had a reduced rate of leaks.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were evaluated from Greece (15) and the United States (20); two patients developed staple line leaks that appeared to be related to problems associated with buttressing materials. Eleven prior studies and the present series yielded 1,589 procedures, 15 (0.94%) of which were complicated by leaks. The leak rate for patients who were known to have received reinforcement of some sort was 1.45 (95% confidence interval 0.41-3.43) times that for other patients. To detect a difference between 1% and 0.5% as statistically significant in 80% of cases, with a two tailed test and alpha set at 0.05, would require 9,346 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no reason to believe, at this point, that reduction in leak rates occur because reinforcement is used. Because the leak rate is small, the routine reinforcement of the staple line after sleeve gastrectomy is questionable at best, although a decrease in hemorrhage has been reported.

The First International Consensus Summit for Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25-27, 2007

Sleeve gastrectomy is a rapid and less traumatic operation, which thus far is showing good resolution of comorbidities and good weight loss if a narrower channel is constructed than for the duodenal switch. There are potential intraoperative complications, which must be recognized and treated promptly. Like other bariatric operations, there are variations in the technique used. The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is being performed for super-obese and high-risk patients, but its indications have been increasing. A second-stage bariatric operation may be performed if necessary, with increased safety. Long-term results of LSG and further networking are anxiously awaited.

A prospective multicenter study of 163 sleeve gastrectomies: results at 1 and 2 years

BACKGROUND

Good results obtained after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), in terms of weight loss and morbidity, have been reported in few recent studies. Our team has designed a multicenter prospective study for the evaluation of the effectiveness and feasibility of this operation as a restrictive procedure.

METHODS

From January 2003 to September 2006, 163 patients (68% women) with an average age of 41.57 years, were operated on with a LSG. Indications for this procedure were morbid obese [body mass index (BMI)>40 kg/m2] or severe obese patients (BMI>35 kg/m2) with severe comorbidities (diabetes, sleep apnea, hypertension...) with high-volume eating disorders and superobese patients (BMI>50 kg/m2).

RESULTS

The average BMI was 45.9 kg/m2. Forty-four patients (26.99%) were superobese, 84 (51.53%) presented with morbid obesity, and 35 (21.47%) were severe obese patients. Prospective evaluations of excess weight loss, mortality, and morbidity have been analyzed. Laparoscopy was performed in 162 cases (99.39%). No conversion to laparotomy had to be performed. There was no operative mortality. Perioperative complications occurred in 12 cases (7.36%). The reoperation rate was 4.90% and the postoperative morbidity was 6.74% due to six gastric fistulas (3.66%), in which four patients (2.44%) had a previous laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Long-term morbidity was caused by esophageal reflux symptoms (11.80%). The percentage of loss in excessive body weight was 48.97% at 6 months, 59.45% at 1 year (120 patients), 62.02% at 18 months, and 61.52% at 2 years (98 patients). No statistical difference was noticed in weight loss between obese and extreme obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The sleeve gastrectomy seems to be a safe and effective restrictive bariatric procedure to treat morbid obesity in selected patients. LSG may be proposed for volume-eater patients or to prepare superobese patients for laparoscopic gastric bypass or laparoscopic duodenal switch. However, weight regained, quality of life, and evolution ofmorbidities due to obesity need to be evaluated in a long-term follow up.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome following sleeve gastrectomy in severely obese subjects

BACKGROUND

Data on the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy in improving or resolving type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the metabolic syndrome (MS) are scarce.

METHODS

A twelve-month prospective study on the changes in glucose homeostasis and the MS in 91 severely obese T2DM subjects undergoing laparoscopic SG (SG; n = 39) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP; n = 52), matched for DM duration, type of DM treatment, and glycemic control was conducted.

RESULTS

At 12 months after surgery, subjects undergoing SG and GBP lost a similar amount of weight (%EBL: SG: 63.00 +/- 2.89%, BPG: 66.06 +/- 2.34%; p = 0.413). On that evaluation, T2DM had resolved, respectively, in 33 out of 39 (84.6%) and 44 out of 52 (84.6%) subjects after SG and GBP (p = 0.618). The rate of resolution of the MS (SG: 62.2%, BPG: 67.3%; p = 0.392) was also comparable. A shorter DM duration (p < 0.05), a DM treatment not including pharmacological agents (p < 0.05), and a better glycemic control (p < 0.05), were significantly associated with T2DM resolution in both surgical groups. Weight loss was not associated with T2DM resolution after SG or GBP, but was associated with resolution of the MS following the two surgical procedures (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that at 12 months after surgery, SG is as effective as GBP in inducing remission of T2DM and the MS. Furthermore, our data suggest that SG and GBP represent a successful an integrated strategy for the management of the different cardiovascular risk components of the MS in subjects with T2DM.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist healthcare professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Sleeve gastrectomy relieves steatohepatitis in high-fat-diet-induced obese rats

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy is thought to decrease the appetite and body weight of morbid obesity patients in the clinic. The purpose is to investigate the effect of sleeve gastrectomy on preventing steatohepatitis in morbid obesity rats.

METHODS

Thirty rats were randomized into normal chow group (NC), high-fat-diet group (HD), and sleeve group (SG). Rats in the SG group received sleeve gastrectomy operation. After operation, rats in SG and HD group received a high-fat diet, while rats in the NC group received normal chow. Body weight was measured every 10 days. Thirty days later, animals were sacrificed and blood samples were collected to check total cholesterol, HDL, and triglyceride. Fresh liver sections were made and stained with Nile red and observed under a fluorescence microscope.

RESULTS

Rats in the SG group received a moderate body weight decrease (191 +/- 16.2 g) in the first 10 days, while this did not happen in the other two groups (213 +/- 13.7 g and 243 +/- 11.9 g). At the sacrifice date, weight of rats in the SG group was still much lower than those in the HD group. Plasma triglycerol (102.3 +/- 18.6 mg/dL) and cholesterol (84.3 +/- 6.1 mg/dL) of rats in the SG group were much lower than those in the HD group (198.5 +/- 18.5 mg/dL, 133.9 +/- 22.0 mg/dL). Under the fluorescence microscope, adipose infiltration was very obvious in the liver of the HD animals, while adipose infiltration was not serious in the SG group.

CONCLUSION

High-fat diet can result in obvious body weight increase and hepatic adipose infiltration compared with normal chow. Sleeve gastrectomy can decrease body weight even in high-fat-diet models. Body weight control caused by sleeve gastrectomy can relieve high-fat-diet-induced steatohepatitis in rats.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy without an over-sewing of the staple line

BACKGROUND

In the past few years, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) became a widely used bariatric method. Based on results of recent LSG studies, LSG is being increasingly used even as a single bariatric method. On contrary with some other reports, we do not reinforce the LSG staple line with over-sewing. Our pilot study presents treatment outcomes and results 18 months after LSG.

METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive morbidly obese (MO) patients (19 male and 42 female) who underwent LSG from January 2006 to May 2008 were included into the study. The mean age, height, and weight were 37.3 years (29-57), 168 cm (151-187), and 118 kg (97-181), respectively, while mean body mass index (BMI) was 41.8 (36.1-60.4). LSG started at 6 cm from pylorus and ended at the angle of Hiss. For gastric sleeve calibration 38F, intragastric tube was used. All 61 LSG were performed without over-sewing of the staple line. In the last 24 cases, the staple line was covered with Surgiceltrade mark strips, which were however placed without any fixation to the underlying gastric tissue.

RESULTS

Mean operating time was 105 min (80-170) and no conversion to open surgery. An 18-month follow-up was recorded in 39 MO patients. The mean weight loss was 31.3 (range, 21-67 kg) and mean % excess BMI loss reached 72% (range, 64-97%). Neither leak nor disruptions of the staple line and/or sleeve dilatation were recorded.

CONCLUSION

LSG is an effective and safe bariatric procedure with low incidence of complications and mortality in our experience.

Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) in the super-super obese: outcomes in 16 patients

BACKGROUND

The ideal management of the super-super obese patient (SSO) is unclear and controversy exists as to the choice of procedure as well as the risk for increased morbidity and mortality. I present my experience of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) in 16 SSO patients with early follow-up results.

METHODS

Review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. All the patients underwent LMGB by a single surgeon (CP). Data collected included demographics, operative time, length of stay, complications, and weight loss. Follow-up data was obtained at office visits in addition to periodic telephone interviews and e-mails. All office follow-up and review of correspondence from Primary Care Physicians (PCP) was managed by the operating surgeon.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were identified as being SSO and comprise the study group. There were 14 women and two men. Average age was 40 years (27-61). Average weight and BMI were 166 (150-193) and 62.4 (60-73), respectively. All procedures were performed laparoscopically by a single surgeon with no conversion to open. Average operative time was 78 min (41-147 min) and hospital stay was 1.2 days. Intraoperative complications included a liver laceration in one patient and an enterotomy in another. Both were managed laparoscopically. No patients required readmission to the hospital, and there were no major complications or deaths. Weight loss showed a consistent increase over the follow-up period with 2 year results of 72 KG lost or 65% EWL.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a technically simple and safe procedure in SSO patients. LMGB has the advantages of being a single stage procedure, being easily reversible and revisable in a laparoscopic procedure and does not sacrifice portions of the stomach or implant foreign materials. Weight loss appears favorable in the short term; however, information regarding long-term weight loss, durability, and safety profile in this population will require a greater number of patients and longer follow up.

Deciphering the sleeve: technique, indications, efficacy, and safety of sleeve gastrectomy

Some institutions perform sleeve gastrectomy (SG) as the initial operation for high-risk, high body mass index patients planning a definitive weight loss operation in 12-18 months. Other institutions consider SG a viable alternative to other bariatric operations. SG is frequently debated among the bariatric surgeons. Many questions remain about the current state of SG. Should it be performed as a definitive weight loss procedure or as a bridge for another bariatric procedure? Is there a specific BMI at which point SG should be encouraged? Is the weight loss comparable to other bariatric procedures? Is there a higher risk of gastric leak? What is the appropriate sleeve size? What are the hormonal benefits? Does SG predispose to gastroesophageal reflux disease? What is the mechanism of weight loss? Are long-term results available? And what are the complications? We conducted an extensive literature review aiming to resolve these commonly asked questions.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--volume and pressure assessment

BACKGROUND

Aiming to clarify the mechanism of weight loss after the restrictive bariatric procedure of sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), the volumes and pressures of the stomach, of the removed part, and of the remaining sleeve were measured in 20 morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

The technique used consisted of occlusion of the pylorus with a laparoscopic clamp and of the gastroesophageal junction with a special orogastric tube connected to a manometer. Instillation of methylene-blue-colored saline via the tube was continued until the intraluminal pressure increased sharply, or the inflated stomach reached 2,000 cc. After recording of measurements, LSG was performed.

RESULTS

Mean volume of the entire stomach was 1,553 cc (600-2,000 cc) and that of the sleeve 129 cc (90-220 cc), i.e., 10% (4-17%) and that of the removed stomach was 795 cc (400-1,500 cc). The mean basal intragastric pressure of the whole stomach after insufflations of the abdominal cavity with CO(2) to 15 mmHg was 19 mmHg (11-26 mmHg); after occlusion and filling with saline it was 34 mmHg (21-45 mmHg). In the sleeved stomach, mean basal pressure was similar 18 mmHg (6-28 mmHg); when filled with saline, pressure rose to 43 mmHg (32-58 mmHg). The removed stomach had a mean pressure of 26 mmHg (12-47 mmHg). There were no postoperative complications and no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The notably higher pressure in the sleeve, reflecting its markedly lesser distensibility compared to that of the whole stomach and of the removed fundus, indicates that this may be an important element in the mechanism of weight loss.

Efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a stand-alone technique for children with morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is basically unknown as a stand-alone technique for bariatric surgery in children and adolescents. It may be advantageous for this age group though, since it requires neither foreign body placement nor life-long malabsorption. We present the first report about the efficacy of LSG in a small pediatric series.

METHODS

All patients (n = 4, female) had been in a multi-modal weight loss program for several years without long-term success. At referral, the mean age was 14.5 years (range 8-17), mean body mass index (BMI in kg/m(2)) was 48.4 (range 40.6-56.3). All suffered from various features of a metabolic-vascular syndrome like diabetes, dislipidemia, cholecystolithiasis, arterial hypertension. The 8-year-old girl was diagnosed Prader-Willi Syndrome at the age of 2. The decision for bariatric surgery was taken unanimously by the parents, patient, and the obesity team. LSG was performed in a five-trocar technique. With a gastroscope (size 40-F) protecting the lesser curvature, the stomach was resected from the proximal antrum to the angle of His using an ENDO-GIA stapler. The stapler line was secured by a continuous suture 3-0 vicryl.

RESULTS

There were no intra- or postoperative complications. Contrast studies confirmed a J-like gastric remnant (mean volume 76 ml) and ruled out leaks in all cases. After a mean follow-up time of 12 months (range 6-19 months), all the patients had reduced weight (mean BMI to 37.2). The girl with the longest postoperative period went from 121 to 83 kg (BMI from 40.6 to 28.4). Laboratory studies ruled out malnutrition or vitamin deficiency. Monitoring of metabolic parameters showed gradual improvement or even resolution for most features.

CONCLUSION

At a 1-year follow-up, LSG proved a safe and effective option for bariatric surgery in children, achieving moderate weight loss and improvement of comorbidities. Thus, it may be considered as stand-alone technique. Long-term studies however must compare these results with time-tested procedures like gastric banding and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with endoscopic guidance in morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been shown to be an effective first-stage procedure for morbidly obese patients. The SG is presently performed over a bougie of varying sizes, which is useful, but known to produce injuries on insertion. In a retrospective study, we evaluated the effect of the laparoscopic SG (LSG) on excess weight loss during 1 year of follow-up using a 29F endoscope instead of a bougie.

METHODS

During a 1-year period, LSG was performed on 20 (18 women and 2 men) consecutive patients. Gamma regression analysis was used to determine whether the variation in gender, age, initial body mass index, Hispanic ethnicity, and interval after surgery were related to excess weight loss.

RESULTS

No deaths and 1 minor complication of oozing from the staple line occurred. The excess weight loss increased steadily over time, with a median 20% at 3 months, 32% at 6 months, 42% at 9 months, and 53% at 12 months. The median initial body mass index was 44.5 kg/m2, and the median age was 50 years. Of the 20 patients, 2 were men (10%) and 18 women (90%); 5 (25%) were Hispanic and 15 (75%) were non-Hispanic. The patients had a median 11.5 co-morbidities. Nausea was common for about 7 days postoperatively. An increase in the initial body mass index and increased co-morbidities were the only 2 variables directly and statistically connected with the percentage of excess weight loss (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that LSG with endoscopic guidance appears safe and effective and could be tried using a larger set of patients as a single-stage operation.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an isolated bariatric procedure: intermediate-term results from a large series in three Austrian centers

BACKGROUND

Gastric sleeve resection was initially planned as the first step of bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch but it continues to emerge as a restrictive bariatric procedure on its own. We describe intermediate results in a series of 126 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG) compiled from three bariatric centers in eastern Austria.

METHODS

The stomach was laparoscopically reduced to a "sleeve" along the lesser curvature over a 48-Fr bougie. Special attention was placed on complete resection of the gastric fundus.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 19.1 months, patients had lost between 2.3 and 27 kg/m(2) or between 6.7% and 130% of their excessive weight. Sixty four percent of the patients lost >50% of their excess weight within an average of 20 months. Seven percent of the patients had an excess weight loss <25% and were therefore considered as failures. The only major surgical complication was leakage of the staple-line needing revision (three times). There were no operative mortalities.

CONCLUSION

The final place of LSG in bariatric surgery is still unclear, but our results and those of others show that LSG can be a viable alternative to established procedures.

Indications for sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for weight loss in the morbidly obese

BACKGROUND

Single-stage laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) may represent an additional surgical option for morbid obesity.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of LSG performed from November 2004 to April 2007 as a one-stage primary restrictive procedure.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-eight LSGs were performed as primary procedures for weight loss. The mean patient age was 42 years (range, 13-79), mean body mass index of 43.4 kg/m(2) (range, 35-75), mean operative time of 60 min (range, 58-190), and mean blood loss of 60 ml (range, 0-300). One hundred forty-seven procedures (99.3%) were completed laparoscopically, with a mean hospital stay of 2.7 days (range, 2-25). A 2.7% major complication rate was observed with four events in three patients and no deaths. Four patients required readmission; mild dehydration in two, choledocholithiasis in one, and a gastric sleeve stricture in one.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic SG is a safe one-stage restrictive technique as a primary procedure for weight loss in the morbidly obese with an acceptable operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative complication rate.

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery improves candidacy in morbidly obese patients awaiting transplantation

BACKGROUND

To evaluate, at a university tertiary referral center, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with cirrhosis or end-stage lung disease (ESLD); and to determine whether these procedures help patients become better candidates for transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of selected patients with end-stage organ failure who were not eligible for transplantation because of morbid obesity who underwent LRYGB or LSG. The prospectively collected data included demographics, operative details, complications, percentage of excess weight loss, postoperative laboratory data, and status of transplant candidacy.

RESULTS

Of the 15 patients, 7 with ESRD underwent LRYGB and 6 with cirrhosis and 2 with ESLD underwent LSG. Complications developed in 2 patients (both with cirrhosis); no patient died. The mean follow-up was 12.4 months, and the mean percentage of excess weight loss at > or =9 months was 61% (ESRD), 33% (cirrhosis), and 61.5% (ESLD). Obesity-associated co-morbidities improved or resolved in all patients. Serum albumin and other nutritional parameters at > or =9 months after surgery were similar to the preoperative levels in all 3 groups. At the most recent follow-up visit, 14 (93%) of 15 patients had reached our institution's body mass index limit for transplantation and were awaiting transplantation; 1 patient with ESLD underwent successful lung transplant.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study have provided preliminary evidence that LRYGB in patients with ESRD and LSG in patients with cirrhosis or ESLD is safe, well-tolerated, and improves their candidacy for transplantation.

A prospective randomized study comparing two different techniques for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) represents a relatively new restrictive operation for obesity. We report a prospective randomized study comparing two different techniques of performing this procedure.

METHODS

Between January and August 2006, 20 patients (group A) and 20 patients (group B) were prospectively and randomly submitted to LSG. The characteristics of the patients in the two groups were similar for age and sex. The median preoperative weight was of 120 kg (95-180) (A) and 133 kg (83-175) (B) (NS). The median preoperative BMI was of 42.5 kg/m2 (35-58) (A) and 47 kg/m2 (37-58) (B) (NS). The two techniques differ in that in A, stapling is performed after full devascularization and mobilization of the gastric curve, whereas in B stapling is performed as soon as the lesser sac is entered and the greater curve is devascularized after full completion of the sleeve. The staple-line is reinforced at the end of stapling in both techniques.

RESULTS

Median operative time was 34 min (12-54) (A) and 25 min (9-51) (B) (P = 0.06). Median peroperative bleeding was 5 mL (0-450) (A) and 5 mL (0-100) (B) (P = 0.37). Median number of staple cartridges used was 6 (5-7) (A) and 6 (4-7) (B) (P = 0.63). Peroperative complications were a small hiatal hernia requiring repair and a bleeding in two patients of A. Postoperative leak occurred in 1 patient of A, and minor early complications affected 2 patients of A and 1 patient of B. Peroperative and postoperative mortality was 0. Median hospital stay was 3 days (1-10) (A) and 3 days (2-7) (B) (P = 0.59). One stenosis as a late complication appeared in a patient of B. %EWL at 6 months and 1 year was respectively 43.4% (A), 42.2% (B) and 48.3% (A) 49.5% (B) (P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

LSG can be performed by two different techniques. The technique B (section of the stomach followed by its mobilization) appears familiar to surgeons usually performing laparoscopic RYGBP. No observed differences are significant, but the technique B when looking at observed distributions, seems to be better than the technique A (mobilization of the stomach followed by its section) in terms of operative time, peroperative bleeding and hospital stay.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity

The incidence of obesity is steadily rising, and it has been estimated that 40% of the US population will be obese by the year 2025 if the current trend continues. In recent years there has been renewed interest in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity in concomitance with the epidemic of obesity. Bariatric surgery proved effective in providing weight loss of large magnitude, correction of comorbidities and excellent short-term and long-term outcomes, decreasing overall mortality and providing a marked survival advantage. The Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) has increased in popularity and is currently very “trendy” among laparoscopic surgeons involved in bariatric surgery. As LSG proved to be effective in achieving considerable weight loss in the short-term, it has been proposed by some as a sole bariatric procedure. This editorial focuses on the particular advantages of LSG in the treatment of morbid obesity.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume

BACKGROUND

Although the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for morbidly obese patients with a BMI of <50 kg/m2, the incidence of weight gain by change of eating behaviors, and gastric dilatation following LSG have not been investigated thus far, LSG is becoming more common as a single-stage operation for the treatment morbid obesity.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of the initial 120 patients who underwent isolated LSG. Initially, the LSG was performed without a calibration tube and resulted in high sleeve volumes (group 1: n=25). In group 2 (n=32), a calibration tube of 44 Fr and in group 3 (n=63) a calibration tube of 32 Fr were used. The study group consists of 101 patients with high BMI who were scheduled for a two-step LBPD-DS, but rejected the second step after 1 year. Study endpoints include estimated sleeve volume, volume of removed stomach, operative time, complication rates, length of hospital stay, changes in co-morbidity, percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBL) and changes in BMI (kg/m2).

RESULTS

All 3 groups were comparable regarding age, gender, and co-morbidities. There was no hospital mortality, but there was one case of late mortality (0.8%). 2 early leaks (1.7%) were seen. % excess BMI loss was significantly higher for patients who underwent LSG with tube calibrations. LSG with large sleeve volume showed a slight weight gain during 5 years of observation. A total of 16 patients (13.3%) underwent a second stage procedure within a period of 5 years (2 redo-sleeves, 7 LBPD-DS, 3 LRYGBP).

CONCLUSION

Early weight loss results were not different between the groups, but after 2 years the more restrictive LSG (groups 2, 3) results were significantly better than in patients without calibration. A removed gastric volume of <500 cc seems to be a predictor of failure in treatment or early weight regain. A statistically significant improved health status and quality of life were registered for all groups. The general introduction of LSG as a one-stage restrictive procedure in the bariatric field can be considered only if the procedure is standardized and long-term results are available.

[Sleeve gastrectomy: a new approach to bariatric surgery]

Over the last 15 years, obesity surgery has developed tremendously. The two most frequently practiced procedures are the adjustable gastric ring and gastric by-pass. A new intervention has recently appeared: the sleeve gastrectomy, an essentially restrictive intervention consisting of a vertical gastrectomy including the entire greater curvature of the stomach while leaving in place an approximately 100-ml gastric tube along the lesser curvature. This intervention was initially proposed as the first part of a duodenal switch in patients whose body mass index was greater than 60 kg/m2. Since then, these indications have developed and this intervention now enjoys a certain fervor on the part of bariatric surgery teams. The objective of this mini-review is to detail the technical aspects of this procedure, its morbidity and mortality, and the long-term results, although there are currently few teams with more than 3 years of experience.

Short-term effects of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus in severely obese subjects

BACKGROUND

Data on the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in improving or resolving type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are scarce.

METHODS

A 4-month prospective study was conducted on the changes in glucose homeostasis in 35 severely obese T2DM subjects undergoing laparoscopic SG (LSG) and 50 subjects undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP), matched for DM duration, type of DM treatment, and glycemic control.

RESULTS

At 4-months after surgery, LSG and LRYGBP operated subjects lost a similar amount of weight (respectively, 20.6 +/- 0.7% and 21.0 +/- 0.6%). T2DM had resolved respectively in 51.4% and 62.0% of the LSG and LRYGBP operated subjects (P = 0.332). A shorter preoperative DM duration (P < 0.05), a preoperative DM treatment not including pharmacological agents, and a better pre-surgical fasting plasma glucose (P < 0.01) or HbAlc (P < 0.01), were significantly associated with a better type 2 DM outcome in both surgical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that LSG and LRYGBP result in a similar rate of type 2 DM resolution at 4-months after surgery. Moreover, our data suggest that mechanisms beyond weight loss may be implicated in DM resolution following LSG and LRYGBP.

Antireflux sleeve gastroplasty: description of a novel technique

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity is associated with a high incidence of postoperative permanent heartburn as a result of gastroesophageal reflux. In order to avoid this complication, the authors developed a new technique, combining the creation of a very long and narrow vertical gastroplasty with an antireflux procedure.

METHOD

The new operation was performed in 3 patients with BMI 40, 46 and 50 (1 male, 2 females). All the procedures were conducted laparoscopically using 6 trocars. The greater curvature of the stomach was mobilized in the antral region. A primary hole in both walls of the stomach was made in the antrum 5-7 cm proximal to the pylorus. Starting from this hole, the stomach was stapled and divided along a 33-Fr bougie to the angle of His, creating a long (15-20 cm), narrow tube. The divided fundus was then passed behind the mobilized abdominal part of the esophagus and a 360 degrees wrap was made (as in a Nissen procedure).

RESULTS

None of the 3 patients developed complications. Excess BMI loss at 5 to 7 months has been good. No signs of esophagitis have been revealed during postoperative upper GI endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

This operation is technically simple. Preliminary early postoperative results regarding its antireflux and weight-loss effects are encouraging.

Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has recently become a feasible option in the management of morbid obesity. The objective of this study was to examine the morbidity and mortality arising from LSG as a primary procedure for weight loss.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 164 patients who underwent LSG from 2004 to 2007. Patients underwent LSG as a primary procedure or as revisional bariatric surgery. The short-term morbidity and mortality were examined.

RESULTS

One-stage LSG was performed in 148 patients. The major complication rate was 2.9% (4 of 149), including 1 leak (0.7%) and 1 case of hemorrhage (0.7%)-each requiring reoperation-1 case of postoperative abscess (0.7%), and 1 case of sleeve stricture that required endoscopic dilation (0.7%). One late complication of choledocholithiasis and bile duct stricture required a Whipple procedure. LSG was used as revisional surgery in 16 patients (9%); of these, 13 underwent LSG after complications related to laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, 1 underwent LSG after aborted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and 2 underwent LSG after failed jejunoileal bypass. One of these patients developed a leak and an abscess (7.1%) requiring reoperation. One case was aborted, and 2 cases were converted to an open procedure secondary to dense adhesions. No patient died in either group. All but 3 cases were completed laparoscopically (98%).

CONCLUSION

LSG is a relatively safe surgical option for weight loss as a primary procedure and as a primary step before a secondary nonbariatric procedure in high-risk patients.

Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity

The rising prevalence of morbid obesity and the increased incidence of super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m2) seeking surgical treatments has led to the search for surgical techniques that provide adequate EWL with the least possible morbidity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was initially added as a modification to the biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and then combined with a duodenal switch (DS) in 1988. It was first performed laparoscopically in 1999 as part of a DS and subsequently done alone as a staged procedure in 2000. With the revelation that patients experienced weight loss after SG, interest in using this procedure as a bridge to more definitive surgical treatment has risen. Benefits of SG include the low rate of complications, the avoidance of foreign material, the maintenance of normal gastro-intestinal continuity, the absence of malabsorption and the ability to convert to multiple other operations. Reduction of the ghrelin-producing stomach mass may account for its superiority to other gastric restrictive procedures. SG should be in the armamentarium of all bariatric surgeons. Nonetheless, long-term studies are necessary to see if it is a durable procedure in the treatment of morbid obesity.

Staple-line reinforcement with bovine pericardium in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: experimental comparative study in pigs

BACKGROUND

We studied the usefulness of Bovine Pericardial strips (BPS) as a buttress in the prevention of complications from the gastric staple-line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

LSG was carried out in 18 pigs. Resection of the stomach was performed with 4.8-mm/30-mm linear stapler either without (Control Group--n = 9) or with BPS (Buttress Group--n = 9). Intra- and postoperative blood losses were assessed. Leaks were evaluated with methylene blue test intra-operatively and then clinically. The animals were sacrificed 2 weeks after surgery and the abdominal cavity was evaluated for fluid collections and adhesions, and the burst pressure of the stomach was measured and histopathological study of the staple-line was performed. Student t-test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

No leaks were detected except for one small subclinical leak in the buttress group. Internal ulcers at the staple-line were seen more frequently in the Buttress group (6 vs 3, not significant). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to operative time (65.3 +/- 14.2 min, 69.7 +/- 12.8 min), intra-operative bleeding (9.6 +/- 2.2 ml, 8.2 +/- 1.5 ml), postoperative hemoglobin levels (11.3 +/- 1.9 g%, 11.8 +/- 2.2 g%), and burst pressure (152.6 +/- 23.5 mmHg, 161.2 +/- 15.8 mmHg) for the Control and Buttress groups respectively. More intense adhesions and inflammatory response were observed in the Buttress Group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental model, the use of bovine pericardium as a staple-line buttress in LSG was easy and safe; however, it did not decrease the occurrence of complications.

Technical aspects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 25 morbidly obese patients

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has recently come to be performed as a sole bariatric operation. The postoperative morbidity and mortality are cause for concern, and possibly are related to non-standardized surgical technique.

METHODS

The following is the surgical LSG technique used in 25 morbidly obese patients. Five trocars are used. Division of the vascular supply of the greater gastric curvature is begun at 6-7 cm proximal to the pylorus, proceeding to the angle of His. A 50-Fr calibrating bougie is positioned against the lesser curvature. The LSG is created using a linear stapler-cutter device with one 4.1-mm green load for the antrum, followed by five to seven sequential 3.5-mm blue loads for the remaining gastric corpus and fundus. The staple-line is inverted by placing a sero-serosal continuous absorbable suture over the bougie from the angle of His. The resected stomach is removed through the 12-mm trocar, and a Jackson-Pratt drain is left along the suture-line.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 120 minutes, and length of hospital stay was 4 +/- 2 days. There were no conversions to open procedures. There were no postoperative complications (no hemorrhage from the staple-line, no anastomotic leakage, no stricture) and no mortality. In 1 patient, cholecystectomy was also done, and in 4, a gastric band was removed. During a median follow-up of 4 months, BMI decreased from 43 +/- 5 kg/m2 to 34 +/- 6 kg/m2, and the % excess BMI loss was 49 +/- 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective procedure for morbid obesity.

Management of the challenging bariatric surgical patient

Despite the continued increase in surgical procedures for weight loss, the dramatic increase in the prevalence of morbid obesity far outpaces the treatments to correct it. As a result, the primary care physician is increasingly more likely to be evaluating patients who are either candidates for weight loss surgery or who have already undergone a weight loss procedure. Unique medical and social situations must be considered when evaluating these patients, and it is anticipated that all physicians will be seeing a greater number of complex or challenging patients.

Bariatric surgery primer for the internist: keys to the surgical consultation

The increasing prevalence of morbid obesity in North America combined with the refinement of laparoscopic techniques for the performing these operations has contributed to the exponential growth of bariatric surgery over the last 10 years. There are many important considerations for the internist who is referring a patient for bariatric surgery.

Sleeve gastrectomy: a restrictive procedure?

BACKGROUND

Diet and surgically-induced weight loss have been shown to lead to alterations in motor and sensory function of the stomach. We investigated the clinical outcome and gastric emptying of solid foods in morbidly obese (MO) patients following sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

METHODS

We studied 23 MO patients [(7 males, 16 females), mean age 38.9 +/- 11.0 years (range 20-64 years), mean weight 135.1 +/- 19.0 kg (range 97-167 kg), mean BMI 47.2 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2) (range 39.6-56.0 kg/m(2))] who each underwent a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for weight reduction. At the monthly follow-up visits, variations in weight and BMI changes, postoperative meal size and frequency, and presence of gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded. 11 patients underwent scintigraphic measurement of the gastric emptying of a solid meal pre- and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in patients' weight was evidenced at 6 and 12 months postoperatively [98.6 +/- 11.8 kg and 87.0 +/- 10.7 kg respectively (P=0.001)]. BMI decreased to 35.2 +/- 4.3 kg/m(2) at 6 months and to 31.1 +/- 4.5 kg/m(2) at 12 months, respectively (P=0.001). Although meal size was drastically reduced, meal frequency increased postoperatively in 12 patients (52.2%). Only 5 patients (21.8 %) reported occasional vomiting after meals following SG. The gastric emptying half-time (T1/2) accelerated (47.6 +/- 23.2 vs 94.3 +/- 15.4, P<0.01) and the T-lag phase duration decreased (9.5 +/- 2 min vs 19.2 +/- 2 min, P<0.05) post-operatively. The percentage of the meal emptied from the stomach 90 min after consumption increased significantly after SG (75.4 +/- 14.9% vs 49.2 +/- 8.7%, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that following SG, the stomach empties its contents rapidly into the small intestine and symptoms of vomiting after eating (characteristic of restrictive procedures) are either absent or very mild. Therefore, the term 'restrictive' is possibly ill-advised for this new bariatric operation. It remains for other mechanisms of energy intake reduction, such as intestinal distension and satiety signals through gut hormones to be investigated, to comprehensively explain precisely how this 'food limiting' procedure results in weight loss.

Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity. The Future Procedure of Choice?

I report the general experience of performing sleeve gastrectomy defined as "a partial gastrectomy that results in removal of most of the stomach," as a first-stage procedure for morbidly and super-obese people. I also explore its potential as a single procedure evaluating its advantages and disadvantages. This procedure is designed to reduce the size of the stomach and its distention, whereby the patient feels full sooner and their appetite is decreased. Some posit-increased satiety results from the decreased ghrelin, secreted by the fundus, which is resected during this procedure. The advantages of sleeve gastrectomy are as follows: the stomach is reduced without loss of function, pyloric preservation prevents dumping, it requires only 1 day in the hospital, it provides an effective first-stage procedure for super-obese patients, it is useful in patients with disorders such as anemia or Crohn's disease, which preclude intestinal bypass, it can be performed laparoscopically, even in patients who weigh over 500 lbs, no band adjustment is required, it does not result in malabsorption, and it provides a good educational teaching base for doctors lacking experience in the treatment of gastric ulcers. The disadvantages include the risk of stapling complications and its irreversibility.

Complications of antiobesity surgery

Bariatric surgery is an effective long-term treatment for patients who suffer from morbid obesity, the incidence of which is increasing in North America. Laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement are the two commonly performed bariatric procedures. This article discusses the indications for bariatric surgery and the early and late complications associated with these two procedures. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy are also briefly discussed.