Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel-carboplatin versus paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin as first line therapy for patients with suboptimally debulked, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. A phase II trial of sequential doublets. The GO-First Study

OBJECTIVES

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin are active in epithelial ovarian cancer with minimal overlapping toxicity. We studied the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in patients with advanced ovarian cancer when given prior to carboplatin and paclitaxel.

METHODS

Chemonaive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable disease were eligible for the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days (GO) for 4 cycles. This was followed by carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days (CP) for 4 cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty patients, median age 62 years (range 39-78), FIGO stages III (16) and IV (4) received treatment. The response rate (RR) after 4 cycles of GO was 80% (95%CI 61-99%) (4 complete responses (CR), 12 partial responses (PR)). Interval debulking surgery was performed in 7 patients (35%). After CP chemotherapy, RR increased to 85% (95%CI 68-100%) (CR = 13, PR = 4). Median time to progression was 14.5 months. Estimated median overall survival was 31.5 months. Toxicities of GO were mild; grade 3/4 nausea in 3 patients (15%) and vomiting in 2 patients (10%), grade 3/4 neutropenia in 5 patients (25%). Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 5 patients (25%). After sequential administration of CP, grade 2/3 neuropathy occurred in 13 patients (72%).

CONCLUSION

The sequential doublet regimen of GO followed by CP resulted in unacceptable neurotoxicity and is not recommended for further study; however, the doublet gemcitabine and oxaliplatin has significant activity in the first line treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.

Preoperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor as a prognostic parameter in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels have been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome in patients with ovarian cancer. We studied the clinical value of serum VEGF as an independent prognostic parameter.

METHODS

In the present study, we ascertained preoperative serum VEGF in a series of 314 patients with ovarian cancer: 45 new cases and 269 from four previously published studies. Serum VEGF was evaluated prior to primary surgery, results were correlated with clinical data.

RESULTS

Median serum VEGF was 407 (238-746) pg/mL. In a univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis, FIGO stage, residual tumor mass, tumor grade, patients' age, serum CA 125, and preoperative serum VEGF were associated with overall survival. In a multivariate Cox regression model, higher FIGO stage, presence of residual tumor mass after primary surgery, and higher serum VEGF were independently associated with a shortened overall survival. Planned subgroup analysis was performed for patients with ovarian cancer FIGO stage I. In a multivariate Cox regression model, higher tumor grade and higher serum VEGF were the only independent prognosticators for overall survival. Patients with FIGO stage I ovarian cancer and a serum VEGF > or = 380 pg/mL had an 8-fold increased risk for experiencing cancer-related death.

CONCLUSION

Serum VEGF is an independent prognostic parameter in patients with all stages of ovarian cancer.

Treatment of ovarian cancer using intraperitoneal chemotherapy with taxanes: from laboratory bench to bedside

The combination of a taxane, paclitaxel or docetaxel, and a platinum compound has become the systemic chemotherapy of choice for primary ovarian cancer and has demonstrated high efficacy. However, ultimately most patients will die from this disease. Hence, there is a need for even more effective systemic chemotherapy or different treatment strategies. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy with taxanes is such an alternative treatment option. Ovarian cancer is theoretically an attractive malignancy for this regional treatment, because the disease remains largely confined to the peritoneal cavity. The choice of taxanes for this kind of chemotherapy is rational, because of its high activity against ovarian cancer cells and expected favourable pharmacokinetics because of limited absorption from the peritoneal cavity due to their large molecular weight and first-pass effect in the liver. In animal model and human pharmacokinetic studies, very high intraperitoneal drug concentrations and exposure and high peritoneal tumour concentrations were achieved, while systemic drug levels were low. The combination of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with hyperthermia enhances the penetration and cytotoxic activity of many drugs. Although data concerning thermal enhancement of taxane cytotoxicity are inconsistent, experimental studies show that at high locoregional concentrations there seems to be such an effect. Recently, feasibility and efficacy of this treatment have evidently been demonstrated in various clinical studies. A large randomized trial revealed improvement of outcome by intraperitoneal instillation chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line treatment. Moreover, promising results have been observed after intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with docetaxel for recurrent disease.

Chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

The purpose of this review is to provide readers with guidance concerning treatment of patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in the context of clinical trial data. We discuss issues surrounding the treatment of patients with SCCHN, with an emphasis on recommendations based on results from phase II and III clinical trials published since 1980. Many options exist for the treatment of patients with SCCHN. The most important decisions involve determining which patients are in need of treatment and which are most likely to benefit from treatment. Although many chemotherapy treatments have been shown to induce responses, survival improvement remains an unfulfilled goal. Definitive data do not exist on the effects of chemotherapy on quality of life or progression-free survival as measures of clinical benefit in this setting. Performance status, history of prior treatment, extent of tumor, and need for palliation are the most important factors in the decision to treat a patient with chemotherapy for incurable SCCHN. Single-agent treatment with conventional doses of methotrexate remains a standard for most patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Cisplatin plus fluorouracil, cisplatin plus a taxane, and single-agent taxane are the most widely studied alternatives. There is a need for further trials with end points other than overall survival or tumor response in this patient population. Guidelines for patient selection and treatment options are provided.

The neurokinin1 receptor antagonist aprepitant as an antiemetic for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

The neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist aprepitant has become part of standard antiemetic therapy for high-dose cisplatin. Recent results indicate that chemotherapy for breast cancer that contains an anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide is more emetogenic than has been previously realised. One large randomised trial demonstrated that aprepitant substantially reduces the risk of vomiting or retching when added to a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (HT3) receptor antagonist. The adverse effects of standard antiemetics and chemotherapy do not appear to be increased by the addition of this novel antiemetic agent. Aprepitant should now also be considered to be part of prophylactic antiemetic therapy for women who receive chemotherapy that contains an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide. The role of NK1 receptor antagonists in preventing emesis due to other cytotoxic agents that are deemed to be moderately emetogenic is still unclear.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy with taxanes for ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination

Paclitaxel and docetaxel are currently the two clinically available taxanes. The combination of a taxane and a platinum compound has become the systemic chemotherapy of choice for primary ovarian cancer. Despite the high activity of these drugs in systemic chemotherapy, the majority of patients with advanced ovarian cancer will develop recurrent disease and ultimately decease of this disease. Therefore, more effective systemic chemotherapy regimens or alternative treatment modalities are warranted. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is such an alternative treatment option. Pharmacokinetic studies on intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel and docetaxel demonstrated very high locoregional drug concentrations and exposure. Their activity and response seem to be dose-dependent and hence higher efficacy with limited systemic toxicity is to be expected. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be combined intraoperatively with hyperthermia, which enhances tissue penetration and cytotoxic activity of many drugs. The data concerning thermal enhancement of taxanes are inconsistent, but at the high locoregional concentrations provided by intraperitoneal drug administration such a thermal enhancement seems to exist. Clinical studies have clearly demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation chemotherapy with taxanes in patients with ovarian cancer. Preliminary results of a phase III study demonstrated improved outcome with the addition of intraperitoneal instillation chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy after optimal primary cytoreductive surgery. Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with docetaxel has been performed in a single study, in which promising results were observed. Further clinical investigations with an adequate follow-up period are needed to confirm the promising initial results and to determine the exact efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with these drugs.

The role of maintenance therapy and novel taxanes in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Despite several studies reporting various degrees of success, the role of maintenance chemotherapy in ovarian cancer remains controversial. This article reviews the available data and the controversy surrounding maintenance therapy. In addition, the role of novel taxanes, which may offer an improved therapeutic index and reduced toxicity relative to conventional therapies in this setting, is discussed.

METHODS

The available randomized clinical data on extended or maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer are reviewed.

RESULTS

Available data indicate that patients with ovarian cancer undergoing taxane maintenance chemotherapy exhibit a reduced recurrence rate and a longer progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

While an additional randomized trial is needed to confirm these benefits and establish maintenance therapy as the standard of care, the authors conclude that maintenance therapy is a valuable option that should be discussed with patients until further data are available. The Gynecologic Oncology Group 212 trial is a randomized clinical trial that is designed to answer whether taxane maintenance therapy offers a survival advantage as well as to determine the impact of such a therapeutic regimen on a patient's quality of life. This trial is also designed to address some of the questions regarding the role of a novel taxane in maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer.

Factors influencing p53 expression in ovarian cancer as a biomarker of clinical outcome in multicentre studies

The prognostic impact of p53 immunostaining in a large series of tumours from epithelial ovarian cancer patients in a two-centre study was analysed. The study population (n=476) comprised of a retrospective series of 188 patients (Dutch cohort) and a prospective series of 288 patients (Scottish cohort) enrolled in clinical trials. P53 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analysed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Aberrant p53 overexpression was significantly associated with PFS in the Dutch and Scottish cohorts (P=0.001 and 0.038, respectively), but not with OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, when the two groups were combined and account taken of clinical factors and country of origin of the cohort, p53 expression was not an independent prognostic predictor of PFS or OS. In this well-powered study with minimal methodological variability, p53 immunostaining is not an independent prognostic marker of clinical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer. The data demonstrate the importance of methodological standardisation, particularly defining patient characteristics and survival end-point data, if biomarker data from multicentre studies are to be combined.

Systemic therapy for ovarian cancer: current status and new treatments

Current systemic therapy for ovarian cancer consists of a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel. While the majority of patients achieve clinical complete remission after six cycles of chemotherapy, the relapse rate stands at over 50%. Median survival time for patients after recurrence is approximately 2 years. New treatment approaches for patients with advanced ovarian cancer include consolidation and maintenance therapy, intraperitoneal administration of cytotoxic agents, new combination chemotherapy regimens, the development of new cytotoxic agents, and molecular-targeted therapies. These agents will be evaluated either singularly or with chemotherapy. Currently, the Gynecologic Oncology Group is evaluating a combination of bevacizumab together with paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. This trial is based on phase II data that suggest that bevacizumab as a single agent has significant activity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. In addition, the Gynecologic Oncology Group will be conducting phase II trials of different combinations of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in an effort to decrease toxicity associated with current intraperitoneal regimens that have shown an improvement in survival in patients with small-volume stage III disease. The Gynecologic Oncology Group will also be conducting a trial of maintenance therapy in patients who enter clinical complete remission with paclitaxel plus carboplatin, comparing observation with monthly paclitaxel or monthly paclitaxel poliglumex. Novel new cytotoxic and biologic agents are also being evaluated as single agents in phase II trials in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Paclitaxel versus docetaxel for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase II trial in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil

Taxanes have clearly demonstrated activities against gastric cancer. We compared the combination of paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF) with docetaxel plus 5-FU (DF) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with measurable metastatic gastric cancer. Seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, in combination with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1-5. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Of 314 chemotherapy cycles delivered (median 5 in both groups), dose reduction was required more frequently in the DF group, being 9 and 19%, respectively (P<0.01). PF was associated with, although statistically insignificant, substantially less grade 3 or 4 toxicities than DF (68 versus 85%; P=0.09). Global quality of life was similar in both groups, but substantive differences in many symptom scores including pain, dyspnea, constipation and diarrhea favored PF. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between PF and DF with respect to response rate (42 versus 33%, respectively; P=0.53), and failure-free (3.6 versus 4.2 months; P=0.92) and overall survival (9.9 versus 9.3 months; P=0.42). Both PF and DF appear to have efficacy against metastatic gastric cancer, with different, but acceptable, safety profiles.

Docetaxel in ovarian cancer

Docetaxel, a semisynthetic taxane, is a potent inhibitor of cell replication and, similar to paclitaxel, promotes in vitro assembly of stable microtubules and, therefore, prevents the depolymerisation process. Docetaxel has a higher affinity for the tubulin subunit and is associated with a 100-fold greater phosphorylation of BCL-2 inducing apoptosis. Docetaxel in combination with carboplatin demonstrates similar activity to paclitaxel/carboplatin in the upfront management of advanced ovarian cancer with less neurological, but greater haematological toxicity. This article reviews the rationale and indications for the use of docetaxel in ovarian cancer.

Feasibility study comparing docetaxel–cisplatin versus docetaxel–carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of docetaxel-cisplatin combination therapy compared with docetaxel-carboplatin combination therapy as first-line chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Fifty patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ic-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery were randomly assigned to receive treatment with docetaxel-cisplatin (n = 23) or docetaxel-carboplatin (n = 27). Docetaxel 70 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 or carboplatin to an area under the curve of 5 were administered consecutively on Day 1 of a 3-week cycle, for 3 cycles in patients with stage Ic-II cancer and for over 5 cycles in patients with stage III-IV cancer. Patients were evaluated for treatment-related toxicity in each cycle using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0.

RESULTS

Five patients (2 in the docetaxel-cisplatin arm and 3 in the docetaxel-carboplatin arm) discontinued the treatment at the end of the second course of chemotherapy because of apparent disease progression; however, no patients came off the protocol therapy because of treatment-related toxicity. Overall, 103 cycles of docetaxel-cisplatin treatment and 130 cycles of docetaxel-carboplatin treatment were delivered. The major toxicity was neutropenia in both regimens. The total incidence of grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was 83% (19/23) in the docetaxel-cisplatin arm and 96% (26/27) in the docetaxel-carboplatin arm. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was significantly lower in the docetaxel-cisplatin arm [39% (9/23) versus 74% (20/27)].

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel-cisplatin combination therapy may be feasible as first-line chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer.

Novel therapeutic agents in ovarian cancer

AIMS

Epithelial ovarian cancer is responsible for 4% of all cancer deaths in women, and the five-year overall survival of patients with advanced disease is 30-40%. Treatment currently comprises a combination of surgery and chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The main reason for treatment failure is that the majority of patients present with advanced disease, and current drugs are unable to effect a cure even in chemosensitive patients. This article systematically reviews novel therapeutic strategies that have been evaluated in patients with ovarian cancer in the last 5 years.

METHODS

Pubmed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed) and American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual conference abstracts were searched using the terms "(phase I OR phase II OR phase III OR phase 1 OR phase 2 OR phase 3) AND (ovary OR ovarian) AND (cancer OR carcinoma)" from January 2000 to May 2005 to identify studies for potential inclusion in this review. Reviews of novel therapies in ovarian cancer were also used to identify additional clinical trials.

FINDINGS

A wide range of therapeutic strategies are currently being evaluated in ovarian cancer. These include novel cytotoxics, small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy and immuno-therapy strategies. The rationale for the development of these agents includes enhancement of efficacy by targeting novel biological pathways, re-sensitisation to existing drugs, simplification of drug administration and/or reduction of drug-toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Current developments have the potential to result in substantial improvements in the outlook for women with ovarian cancer.

Emerging drugs for ovarian cancer

Because most patients presenting with advanced ovarian cancer are not curable by surgery alone, chemotherapy represents an essential component of treatment. The disease may be considered as chemosensitive, as in around three-quarters of patients major (complete) responses are seen to initial treatment with the platinum-containing drugs cisplatin and carboplatin either used alone or in combination with the taxane, paclitaxel. However, only 15-20% of patients experience long-term remission as tumours often become resistant. The probability of achieving a second response depends on the duration of remission after first-line therapy: if this is < 6 months (considered as platinum resistant) second responses are uncommon and usually short-lived; if this is > 6, and especially if > 12 months (platinum sensitive), responses may be seen in about a quarter of patients, to the same drugs as used first line or to drugs such as pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan and hexamethylmelamine (all three are approved in this setting by the FDA). Gemcitabine, oral etoposide, docetaxel and oxaliplatin also show some activity either in sequential addition to existing approved of first-line therapy (as with gemcitabine) or as second-line therapy. However, there is an urgent unmet clinical need for new drugs capable of prolonging survival either by increasing long-term remission rates and/or duration as first-line treatment or to improve on outcomes of second-line treatment. Strategies currently being exploited in clinical trials include attempts to deliver more killing selectively to tumours (e.g., intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin or radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies), agents designed to target drug resistance mechanisms (e.g., TLK-286 activated by glutathione transferase), agents targeting proteins/receptors shown to be selectively expressed in the disease (e.g., monoclonal antibodies recognising CA-125 or HER1; small molecules targeting HER1 such as gefitinib) and disrupting established tumour vasculature (e.g., 5,6-dimethyl xanthenone 4-acetic acid). At the pre-clinical level, agents being developed to target the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway, and K-Ras inhibitors, may offer efficacy in the future.

Significance of early changes in the serum CA-125 antigen level on overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The relationship between survival and early changes in the serum level of the CA-125 antigen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer remains poorly defined.

METHODS

To explore this issue, the serum CA-125 values from 101 patients with advanced ovarian cancer who participated in a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 8412), which compared the systemic delivery of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide vs. carboplatin/cyclophosphamide (both delivered every 28 days for 6 cycles) in suboptimal residual stage III and IV ovarian cancer, were evaluated. All patients in this analysis had CA-125 values available for at least 8 weeks following initiation of chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used in multivariate analysis to determine the prognostic significance of the CA-125 concentration.

RESULTS

While pretreatment CA-125 values did not correlate with survival, the concentration of this tumor marker 8 weeks after initiation of therapy was a powerful independent prognostic factor. The median survivals for patients (n = 51) with a CA-125 < 35 U/ml, vs. patients (n = 50) with a CA-125 > 35 U/ml, at this time point, were 26 months and 15 months, respectively (P = 0.0001). Further, women with serum CA-125 values <50% of their pretreatment concentration at 8 weeks experienced a median survival of 21 months, compared to only 10 months for individuals with tumor marker levels >50% of their baseline value (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

Reduction in the serum CA-125 concentration over the initial two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy is a powerful independent predictor of survival for patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer. Patients without significant declines in CA-125 after two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy have a particularly poor prognosis.

Unresolved Issues in the Chemotherapeutic Management of Gynecologic Malignancies

Despite substantial documented progress in the chemotherapeutic management of women with gynecologic malignancies, a number of highly clinically relevant issues remain unresolved. In ovarian cancer, questions asked by practicing oncologists, patients, and their families include the role of maintenance chemotherapy in routine management of the disease, determining which patients with early stage disease do not require cytotoxic therapy, defining the most appropriate management paradigm for both recurrent and resistant cancer, determining which taxane to combine with carboplatin in the first-line regimen, and developing an optimal intraperitoneal primary chemotherapy regimen for small-volume residual advanced disease. In endometrial cancer, important issues include defining first-line chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent disease and mixed mesodermal endometrial cancer, and determining whether there is a role for adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy in the setting of high-risk early stage cancer. Finally, in cervical cancer, there is a critical need to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for metastatic cancer, as well as to find an effective second-line treatment option for platinum-resistant disease. It is reasonable to anticipate that future clinical trials will answer these and other unresolved issues, just as past well-designed studies have resulted in major improvements in both the survival and quality of life of women with this group of malignancies.

Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005: the state of the art

What are standards? The oncology community expends considerable effort to review the results from definitive treatment studies and define recommendations for future studies, as well as standards of care for the community and patients who are not participating in clinical trials. This is a thoughtful and well-intentioned process but subject to considerable bias due to limitations in the data and/or their interpretation. While ovarian cancer is highly responsive to platinum-based therapy after initial cytoreductive surgery, there is a substantial risk of recurrence, which is accompanied by the emergence of drug-resistant disease. Better treatments with improved long-term outcomes are needed. From this perspective, standards can help to provide a baseline for assessing gaps in our current knowledge and defining priorities for future clinical trials. While not an exhaustive review, this study will focus on key clinical concepts that are guiding ovarian cancer research and treatment.

Ovarian cancer: is the news good enough?

Ovarian cancer (OC) is still the fourth cause of death by cancer among women and the most fatal among gynecological tumors. The purpose of the symposium held every 2 years in Valencia is to report and discuss new developments in the treatment of OC patients. It also tries to clarify what is evidence-based and what is not. In this issue, proteomic advances for early diagnosis and new tumor markers are presented. Controversies about the role of conservative surgery or the role of surgery in the recurrent disease are discussed. In addition, the current standard treatment, new tendencies on therapy, as well as important aspects related to the molecular era have been updated. Reaching international consensus is a challenge but offers the opportunity to test multiple regimens more efficiently against a single control population, rather than conducting multiple smaller studies. Most of the studies presented in this Symposium were carried out in Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup. If indeed answers to the relevant questions are to be obtained more quickly, then a network of current national or international groups could potentially facilitate this.

SCOTROC 2A: carboplatin followed by docetaxel or docetaxel-gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

The feasibility of sequential carboplatin followed by docetaxel-based therapy for untreated ovarian cancer was determined. Patients received four q3w cycles of carboplatin AUC 7, then four q3w cycles of either docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) (day 1) (arm A); docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 1250 mg m(-2) (days 1,8) (arm B) or docetaxel 25 mg m(-2) and gemcitabine 800 mg m(-2) (both given weekly (days 1,8,15)) (arm C). A total of 44 patients were randomised to each treatment arm. None of the arms demonstrated an eight cycle completion rate (70.5/72.7/45.5% in arms A/B/C, respectively), which was statistically greater than 60% (P=0.102, P=0.056, P=0.982) which was our formal feasibility criteria, although only the completion rate in arm C was clearly worse than this level. The overall response rate (ORR) after carboplatin was 65.7% in 70 evaluable patients. In evaluable patients, ORRs after docetaxel-based cycles were: arm A 84.0% (21 out of 25); arm B 77.3% (17 out of 22); arm C 69.6% (16 out of 23). At follow-up (median 30 months), median progression-free survival times were: arm A 15.5 months (95% CI: 10.5-20.6); arm B 18.1 months (95% CI: 15.9-20.3); arm C, 13.7 months (95% CI: 12.8-14.6). Neutropenia was the predominant grade 3-4 haematological toxicity: 77.8/85.7/54.4% in arms A/B/C, respectively. Dyspnoea was markedly increased in both gemcitabine-containing arms (P=0.001) but was worse in arm C. Although just failing to rule out eight cycle completion rates less than 60%, within the statistical limitations of these small cohorts, the overall results for arms A and B are encouraging. Larger phase III studies are required to test these combinations.

Docetaxel in the management of ovarian cancer

Standard first-line treatment for Stage IC-IV ovarian cancer is currently a platinum agent or a combination of a platinum agent with a taxane. The use of a taxane compound in addition to single-agent platinum is increasingly preferred to platinum alone. In countries such as the UK, the taxane paclitaxel has been approved by the government for first-line use. However, it has yet to receive US Food and Drug Administration approval in the USA for use in this context. Typically, in countries such as the UK, patients with advanced ovarian cancer receive a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin first line, both drugs given 3-weekly by intravenous infusion. Subsequent trials have demonstrated that the second-generation taxane docetaxel can be used as a substitute for paclitaxel; sharing many of its actions but with a different toxicity profile. However, docetaxel has not yet received approval for standard use. Here, the clinical development of docetaxel and its present and future place in the management of ovarian cancer is discussed.

Taxane pharmacogenetics

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel exert their anticancer activity by stabilizing microtubules during cell division. There is significant interindividual variability in response and toxicity between paclitaxel and docetaxel. Interpatient variability also exists for response and toxicity from each drug. Variability within genes involved in paclitaxel and/or docetaxel metabolism and transport exists. However, to date there is little evidence to suggest useful markers for the selection of individualized therapy. Epigenetic regulation of taxane pathway genes may play a large role in explaining the variability in toxicity and response.

Prolonged topotecan infusion with cisplatin in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: An NYGOG and ECOG study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the toxicity and efficacy of combined therapy with cisplatin and prolonged infusion topotecan as front line therapy in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with previously untreated, measurable and non-measurable epithelial ovarian cancer, stages Ic-IV were eligible. Patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by topotecan 0.3 to 0.4 mg/m(2)/day given as a continuous infusion over 14-21 days, every 28 days. Dose levels and duration of infusion were adjusted for toxicity as appropriate. Patients were evaluated for response to treatment and treatment toxicity by standard NYGOG criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled. Among the 20 patients with post-surgical residual disease >2 cm, 80% [95% CI (56.3%, 94.3%)] demonstrated an objective response to therapy. The median progression-free survival for all 60 patients enrolled was 19.3 months with a median overall survival of 45.6 months given the median follow-up of 55 months (range 6-81 months). Five year survival is estimated to be 41%. Toxicity was observed in the first four patients treated with topotecan (0.4 mg/m(2)/day x 21 days) and dosing was continued at 0.3 mg/m(2)/day x 14 days thereafter. Of the 56 patients treated at the amended dose level, marrow suppression continued to be dose-limiting, with 86% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 55% experiencing grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and 50% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 anemia. Nonetheless, only 11/245 cycles administered were associated with febrile neutropenia and/or infection (8 port-related). Other non-hematologic toxicity was as expected. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

This large, multicenter phase II study of prolonged infusion topotecan in combination with cisplatin demonstrated similar response, time to progression and survival compared with reported results of taxane and platinum combinations. Hematologic toxicity was greater but tolerated. Further studies investigating topotecan in combination with platinum therapy as a first line agent are warranted.

SCOTROC 2B: feasibility of carboplatin followed by docetaxel or docetaxel-irinotecan as first-line therapy for ovarian cancer

The feasibility of combination irinotecan, carboplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma was assessed. One hundred patients were randomised to receive four 3-weekly cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) 7) followed by four 3-weekly cycles of docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) (arm A, n=51) or docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) with irinotecan 200 mg m(-2) (arm B, n=49). Neither arm met the formal feasibility criterion of an eight-cycle treatment completion rate that was statistically greater than 60% (arm A 71% (90% confidence interval (CI) 58-81%; P=0.079; arm B 67% (90% CI 55-78%; P=0.184)). Median-dose intensities were >85% of planned dose for all agents. In arms A and B, 15.6 and 12.2% of patients, respectively, withdrew owing to treatment-related toxicity. Grade 3-4 sensory neurotoxicity was more common in arm A (1.9 vs 0%) and grade 3-4 diarrhoea was more common in arm B (0.6 vs 3.5%). Of patients with radiologically evaluable disease at baseline, 50 and 48% responded to therapy in arms A and B, respectively; at median 17.1 months' follow-up, median progression-free survival was 17.1 and 15.9 months, respectively. Although both arms just failed to meet the formal statistical feasibility criteria, the observed completion rates of around 70% were reasonable. The addition of irinotecan to first-line carboplatin and docetaxel chemotherapy was generally well tolerated although associated with increased gastrointestinal toxicity. Further exploratory studies of topoisomerase-I inhibitors in this setting may be warranted.

Residual neurotoxicity in ovarian cancer patients in clinical remission after first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel: the Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer (MITO-4) retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin/paclitaxel is the chemotherapy of choice for advanced ovarian cancer, both in first line and in platinum-sensitive recurrence. Although a significant proportion of patients have some neurotoxicity during treatment, the long-term outcome of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy has been scantly studied. We retrospectively assessed the prevalence of residual neuropathy in a cohort of patients in clinical remission after first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

120 patients have been included in this study (101 participating in a multicentre phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of consolidation treatment with topotecan, and 19 treated at the National Cancer Institute of Naples after the end of the trial). All patients received carboplatin (AUC 5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, completing treatment between 1998 and 2003. Data were collected between May and September 2004. Residual sensory and motor neurotoxicity were coded according to the National Cancer Institute--Common Toxicity Criteria.

RESULTS

55 patients (46%) did not experience any grade of neurological toxicity during chemotherapy and of these none had signs of neuropathy during follow-up. The other 65 patients (54%) had chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity during treatment and follow-up data are available for 60 of them. Fourteen out of 60 patients (23%) referred residual neuropathy at the most recent follow-up visit, after a median follow up of 18 months (range, 7-58 months): 12 patients had grade 1 and 2 patients grade 2 peripheral sensory neuropathy; 3 patients also had grade 1 motor neuropathy. The remaining 46/60 patients (77%) had no residual neuropathy at the moment of interview: recovery from neurotoxicity had occurred in the first 2 months after the end of chemotherapy in 22 (37%), between 2 and 6 months in 15 (25%), or after more than 6 months in 9 patients (15%). Considering all 120 treated patients, there was a 15% probability of persistent neurological toxicity 6 months after the end of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel suffer long-term residual neuropathy. This issue should be carefully taken into account before considering re-treatment with the same agents in sensitive recurrent disease.

Does Aggressive Surgery Only Benefit Patients With Less Advanced Ovarian Cancer? Results From an International Comparison Within the SCOTROC-1 Trial

Purpose

Studies indicate that ovarian cancer patients who have been optimally debulked survive longer. Although chemotherapy has been variable, they have defined standards of care. Additionally, it is suggested that patients from the United Kingdom (UK) have inferior survival compared with some other countries. We explored this within the context of a large, international, prospective, randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer (docetaxel-carboplatin v paclitaxel-carboplatin; SCOTROC-1). The Scottish Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer surgical study is a prospective observational study examining the impact on progression-free survival (PFS) of cytoreductive surgery and international variations in surgical practice.

Patients and Methods

One thousand seventy-seven patients were recruited (UK, n = 689; Europe, United States, and Australasia, n = 388). Surgical data were available for 889 patients. These data were analyzed within a Cox model.

Results

There were three main observations. First, more extensive surgery was performed in non-UK patients, who were more likely to be optimally debulked (≤ 2 cm residual disease) than UK patients (71.3% v 58.4%, respectively; P < .001). Second, optimal debulking was associated with increased PFS mainly for patients with less extensive disease at the outset (test for interaction, P = .003). Third, UK patients with no visible residual disease had a less favorable PFS compared with patients recruited from non-UK centers who were similarly debulked (hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.97; P = .010). This observation seems to be related to surgical practice, primarily lymphadenectomy.

Conclusion

Increased PFS associated with optimal surgery is limited to patients with less advanced disease, arguing for case selection rather than aggressive debulking in all patients irrespective of disease extent. Lymphadenectomy may have beneficial effects on PFS in optimally debulked patients.

Sequential gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A phase II study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and efficacy of sequential gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, with the response rate as the primary endpoint.

METHODS

After primary laparotomy, 56 patients with FIGO Stages III-IV disease were given 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1,8 and carboplatin AUC5 (44 patients) or AUC6 (12 patients) d1 q3wk followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 d1 and carboplatin AUC5/6 q3wk. Of the tumors, 43 were serous, 6 clear cell, 4 endometrioid, and 3 anaplastic type. Thirty-seven (66.1%) of the patients were suboptimally debulked.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were evaluable for response by CA-125 criteria, and 46 (98%) responded. Thirty patients (after gemcitabine-carboplatin) and 24 (after paclitaxel-carboplatin) were evaluable for response by CT (RECIST criteria), respectively. After the four gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles, the objective response rate was 83% (6 CR, 19 PR). Following completion of the whole sequential regimen, 7 patients showed a CR and 15 a PR, respectively, giving a response rate of 92%. The median progression-free survival was 12.8 months after a median follow-up of 19 months (range 7-35 months). The median overall survival has not been reached yet. The main toxicity was neutropenia as 139/221 (62.9%) of the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles and 92/181 (50.8%) of the paclitaxel-carboplatin cycles, respectively, were associated with Grades 3-4 neutropenia. Neutropenia was reported as a serious adverse event in 5.7% of the cycles, and G-CSF support was needed in 18.4% of the cycles. Only the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles were associated with a marked thrombocytopenia (32.1% Grades 3-4). Of the other side effects, marked allergy occurred in 14/52 (27%) exposed to paclitaxel. A total of 14 patients discontinued the treatment prematurely: 3 due to lack of efficacy, 1 due to protocol violation, and 10 due to toxicity (4 allergic reactions to paclitaxel, 3 complicated neutropenias, 1 fever, and 2 unspecified toxicities). The mean relative dose intensities were: gemcitabine 84.0%, paclitaxel 85.4%, and carboplatin 96.5%. Of the gemcitabine-carboplatin cycles and paclitaxel-carboplatin cycles, 32% and 38% were delayed, respectively. Gemcitabine d8 dose had to be omitted in 8% of the cycles.

CONCLUSION

The sequential regimen of gemcitabine-carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-carboplatin is feasible in chemotherapy-naive ovarian cancer. Although its use is associated with a marked neutropenia, the neutropenia is manageable.

CpG island methylation of DNA damage response genes in advanced ovarian cancer

We have determined the methylation frequencies of 24 CpG islands of genes associated with DNA damage responses or with ovarian cancer in 106 stage III/IV epithelial ovarian tumors. We have analyzed this data for whether there is evidence of a CpG island methylator phenotype or associations of CpG island methylation with response to chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. Frequent methylation was observed for OPCML, DCR1, RASSF1A, HIC1, BRCA1, and MINT25 (33.3%, 30.7%, 26.4%, 17.3%, 12.3%, and 12.0%, respectively), whereas no methylation was observed for APAF-1, DAPK, FANCF, FAS, P14, P21, P73, SOCS-3, and SURVIVIN. The remaining genes showed only a low frequency of methylation, <10%. Unsupervised gene shaving identified a nonrandom pattern of methylation for OPCML, DCR1, RASSF1A, MINT25, HIC1, and SFRP1, supporting the concept of concordant methylation of these genes in ovarian cancer. Methylation of at least one of the group of genes involved in DNA repair/drug detoxification (BRCA1, GSTP1, and MGMT) was associated with improved response to chemotherapy (P = 0.013). We have examined the frequency of a polymorphism in the DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3b6, which has been previously reported to affect gene transcription and cancer risk. The genetic polymorphism in the DNMT3b6 gene promoter (at position -149) is not significantly associated with the concordant methylation observed, but is weakly associated with the overall frequency of methylation at the genes examined (P = 0.04, n = 56). This supports the hypothesis that genetic factors affecting function of DNMT genes may underlie the propensity of tumors to acquire aberrant CpG island methylation.

Management of recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Despite the standardisation of surgical techniques and significant progress in chemotherapeutics over the last 30 years, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the western world. Although the majority of women achieve a remission following primary therapy, most patients with advanced stage disease will eventually relapse and become candidates for 'salvage' therapy. The chances of a further remission depend on factors such as the 'treatment-free interval', and there are now a large number of chemotherapy agents with activity in ovarian cancer available to the oncologist. Recent randomised studies have reported on survival benefits for chemotherapy in recurrent disease, and therefore careful and appropriate selection of treatments has assumed a greater importance. This article reviews the most current data, and discusses the factors involved in making individualised treatment decisions.

The administration of chemotherapy in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth and ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma most commonly consists of a combination of carboplatin with a taxane derivative. However, treatment-related side effects such as peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia can be debilitating and in certain patient populations alterations may need to be considered.

CASE

We describe a case of a patient with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had pre-existing peripheral neuropathy secondary to Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT). She developed a distal sensory and motor neuropathy after her first treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel and was unable to walk, write, or drive. Upon transfer of care to our center, we changed her taxane to docetaxel and her symptoms improved dramatically. We discuss the outcome of her treatment and the effects of paclitaxel on her underlying peripheral neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease who require chemotherapy may not be able to tolerate the neurotoxic side effects of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Consideration of alternative, less neurotoxic treatment regimens containing docetaxel may be considered.

Docetaxel for treatment of solid tumours: a systematic review of clinical data

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane, a class of anticancer agents that bind to beta tubulin, thereby stabilising microtubules and inducing cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Docetaxel was first approved for the treatment of anthracycline-refractory metastatic breast cancer in the mid-1990s. Since then, several randomised trials have reported improved time-to-progression, overall survival, or both in metastatic breast cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel or docetaxel-based combination regimens. Data from two adjuvant trials have shown a survival benefit with the addition of docetaxel to standard anthracycline-based regimens in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. In four randomised studies, docetaxel improved survival in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Moreover, two trials have shown that docetaxel combined with estramustine or corticosteroids improves survival in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. Here, we review major randomised phase III trials with docetaxel in the treatment of solid malignant disease.